Consumer Perception of Global vs. Local Brands:The Indian Car Industry

Consumer Perception of Global vs. Local Brands: The Indian Car Industry

1

Consumer Perception of Global vs. Local Brands:

The Indian Car Industry

By

Shyamala Mathan Sankar

2006

A Dissertation presented in part consideration for the degree of MA Marketing.


I

Abstract

Key words: Consumer Perception, Global brands, Local brands, consumer

preference, Country-of-origin, foreign brand, globalness, Consumer ethnocentrism.

This study examines consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands in the

Indian car industry. Consumer brand perceptions have substantial implications in

Marketing. The study explores and understands consumer perceptions of global and

local car brands in India by accomplishing the secondary objectives. The secondary

objectives were achieved by highlighting the factors that effect consumer preference

for global brands; by examining the effects of country of origin on consumer

perceptions of global brands and local brands; and by studying the effects of

consumer ethnocentrism towards global brands.

For creating a deep understanding of consumers’ insights of global car brands against

local car brands, qualitative approach was adopted with an in-depth and semi-

structured interview process. Interviews as a qualitative tool helped the researcher to

uncover individual’s covert feelings and emotions towards perception of global

brands vs. local brands.

The findings of the study advised that the consumers who possessed global car

brands, preferred their car brands due to factors such as global presence, worldwide

reputation, and quality of being a foreign make. Prestige or status had a very little or

no influence in their preference for global car brands. Consumers made favorable


II

perceptions of the country, wherein they tend to associate factors such as superior

quality, technical advancements, modernization, etc…to the country from which the

brand had taken its origin. Consumers who owned a local car brand evaluated the

local brand in a favorable manner, wherein they tend to associate the brand to India’s

strong automobile sector that makes quality and technically efficient cars. The study

found to have both non-ethnocentric consumers and consumers who were low on

CET. Most of the respondents perceive local brands to be good in India, but not as

good as the global ones in quality, technical expertise and designs of the cars.


III

Table of Contents

Abstract……………………………………………………………………………… I

List of Figures……………..………………………………………………………..VI

List of Tables………………………………………..………………………………VI

Dedication………………………………………………………………………….VII

Acknowledgement…………...……………………………………………………VIII

Chapter One – Introduction………………………………………………………...1

1.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………....1

1.2 Objectives of the study…………………………………………………..2

1.3 Synopsis of Chapters…………………………………………………….2

Chapter Two - Literature Review…………………………………………………..5

2.1 Introduction………………………………………………………………5

2.2 Brands and Branding…………………………………………………......5

2.3 Local Brands and Global Brands…………………………………………8

2.4 Pros and Cons of Local brands and global brands……………………......9

2.5 Shifts from Local Brands to Global Brands……………………………..12

2.6 Basic factors that effect consumer preference for Global Brands….......13

2.7 Consumer Ethnocentrism and evaluation of global brands and

local brands by consumers…………………………………………….....17

2.8 Consumer Brand Knowledge………………………………………….....20

2.9 Effects of Country-of-Origin (COO), Culture-of-Brand Origin

(COBO) and consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands…...21

2.10 Conclusion………………………………………………………………28


IV

Chapter Three -Industry Overview……………..………………………………….30

3.1 Introduction…………………………………………………………….30

3.2 Indian automobile industry – an Overview……………………………..30

3.3 Advent of cars in India………………………………………………….34

3.4 Local Car Brands in India………………………………………………35

3.5 Global Car Brands in India……………………………………………..36

Chapter Four - Research Methodology…………………………………………...40

4.1. Introduction………………………………………………………….....40

4.2 Research purpose…………………………………………………….....41

4.3 Qualitative Research…………………………………………………....42

4.4 Why Qualitative Research?.......................................................................43

4.5. Interviews………………………………………………………………44

4.6. Sampling…………………………………………………………….....46

4.7. Telephone interview……………………………………………………46

4.8. Summary…………………………………………………………….....49

Chapter Five - Analysis and Findings…………………………………………......50

5.1 Introduction……………………………………………………………..50

5.2 Background of the respondents………………………………………....50

5.3 Analysis and Discussion of the interviews…………………………......51

5.4 Accomplishing objectives of the study………………………………....52

5.4.1. Objective one: Highlighting the factors that effect

consumer preference for global brands……………………………..52

5.4.2. Objective two: Examining the effects of country-of-origin on

consumer perceptions of global brands and local brands…………..57

5.4.3. Objective three: To study the effects of consumer ethnocentrism


V

over global brands………………………………………………….62

5.4.4. Key Objective: To understand consumer perception of

Global brands vs. local brands……………………………………..66

5.5. Review of key Findings and Conclusion………………………………72

Chapter Six – Conclusion………………………………………………………….77

6.1 Conclusions of the study………………………………………………..77

6.2. Limitations of the study and recommendations

for future research……………………………………………………...82

References

Appendix One – Interview template

Appendix Two - Interview Transcripts


VI

TABLE OF FIGURES

Figure 1: Conceptual model of Perceived brand

Globalness................................................................................................ 14

Figure 2: Strong growing automotive sector in both domestic and global

markets.................................................................................................... .32

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: A background of the respondents......................................... ……………51


VII

Dedication

I dedicate this work to my dearest grandpa with fond and everlasting memories of

him.


VIII

Acknowledgements

I would like to convey my heartiest appreciation to Dr Heidi Winklhofer for intensifying my

learning curve. Without her guidance and persistent help, this dissertation would not have

been possible.

I also extended my gratitude to my Mom, Dad, and my Brothers for their unconditional love

and support throughout my work. Their steadfast support and encouragement accompanied

me throughout this journey.

Shyamala Mathan Sankar


1

Chapter One

1.1 Introduction

Brands are at the heart of marketing and business strategy (Doyle, 2002)

Advances in communications and information systems technology have shrunk

distances, thereby linking markets through flows of information across markets. These

trends enhance the management of global operations and drives up the need to deal

effectively with global competition. As firms enter international markets, branding

plays an important role in its marketing strategy. Many consumers use brands as clues

to indicate product performances, instead of engaging themselves in search for

information when deciding between competing brands. Consumers use brands as cues

to make decisions to purchase or try products (Ger et al., 1993). During the recent

years, there has been a great shift from local brands to global brands due to the

display of similar needs and preferences by the consumers.

As the world is shrinking in to a global marketplace, it is increasingly significant to

understand the consumers’ perception of global brands to local brands. Studying

consumer perceptions towards global vs. local brands have substantial implications in

marketing and will also serve as a citation for future research. There would also be

several reasons for consumers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the brand. Thus

there is also a need to uncover the reasons for consumers’ preference for global

brands over local brands.

This study aims in understanding consumer perception of global brands vs. local

brands in the Indian car industry. The car industry in India is undertaken for the study


2

for the simple reason being the strong growth of the automobile sector in India. The

car segment is specifically chosen as it is highly competitive with well established and

flourishing global and local brands. Moreover, consumers in India are now more

informed, sophisticated and demanding. Urban consumers have been especially

exposed to western lifestyles through overseas travel (IBEF, 2006). This served the

purpose for studying the Indian car industry.

1.2 Objectives of the study

The key objective of the study was to understand consumer perception of global

brands vs. local brands in the Indian car industry. The research explores and

comprehends consumers’ perceptions of global brand vs. local brands. The secondary

objectives of the study are to highlight the factors that effect consumer preference for

global brands; to examine the effects of country of origin on consumer perceptions of

global brands and local brands; and to study the effects of consumer ethnocentrism

towards global brands. The study originally achieves the secondary objectives in order

to accomplish the primary objective.

1.3 Synopsis of chapters

The outline of the chapters that are included in the study is depicted as follows;

Second chapter of the study reviews the literature which discusses, what is already

known of the main themes and issues. It covers past research and studies and articles

from relevant journals, books, newspapers, etc. It is a summary of what other people

have written and published around the theme of this particular research. The literature

review is of course critical. The chapter starts by explaining the basics of the study,


3

being brands. Local brands and global brands are brought to light. The reasons for the

shift from local to global brands are then discussed. The factors that are believed to

effect consumer preference of global brands are also discussed. In order to examine

country-of- origin and culture of brand origin effects on consumer perception of

global brands and local brands, the literature regarding it is critically discussed. The

chapter then reviews effects of consumer ethnocentrism with regard to the evaluation

of global brands and local brands by consumers.

Third chapter of the study presents an overview of the chosen industry. The industry

overview starts with the purpose of choosing the Indian car industry for the study and

an overview of the respective industry is presented. This chapter also discusses the

advent of cars in India along with a brief description of the local and global car brands

on Indian roads. This would facilitate the reader to comprehend the study in an

enhanced way.

Fourth chapter of the study describes and evaluates the methods, techniques and

procedures used in the investigation. In this chapter, the methods used are also

justified for the reason it has been used. In order to create a deep understanding of

consumers’ insights of global brands against local brands, qualitative approach was

adopted with an in-depth and semi-structured interview process.

Fifth chapter of the study discusses and critically analyses the findings of the

qualitative data by tentatively examining the interviewees’ responses and beliefs. The

gathered qualitative data are analysed accordingly to accomplish the objectives of the

study. This was done by meticulously comparing the most relevant distinct responses


4

by the interviewees. These distinct responses were also critically analysed with the

support of the past literature and also the researchers’ own personal view and

experience during the interviews. Thus the unique personal quotes of the respondents

remained as the rationale for the analysis of the study. This chapter begins with the

background information of the respondents who possess a car in India. The chapter is

then pursued to analysis and discussion of the findings from the interviews made,

wherein the responses are analysed and discussed with regard to the research

objectives of the study.

Lastly, the Sixth chapter of the study sketches out the conclusion of the study. The

chapter also presents the limitations of the study and provides recommendations for

future research.


5

Chapter Two

2. Literature Review

2.1. Introduction

This chapter reviews concepts and theories by researchers that are highly related to

the area of study. The chapter provides a critical analysis of the views and insights of

various researchers on the subject area. The chapter starts by explaining the basics of

the study, being brands. Local brands and global brands are brought to light. The

reasons for the shift from local to global brands are then discussed. The factors that

are believed to effect consumer preference of global brands are also discussed. In

order to examine country-of- origin and culture of brand origin effects on consumer

perception of global brands and local brands, the literature regarding it is critically

discussed. The chapter then reviews effects of consumer ethnocentrism with regard to

the evaluation of global brands and local brands by consumers.

2.2. Brands and Branding

Branding is the art and cornerstone of marketing (Kotler, 2003).

A brand is defined as a specific name, symbol or design- or, more usually some

combination of these- that is used to distinguish a particular seller’s product (Doyle,

2002). Branding exists from the very early times to distinguish the goods of one

producer from those of another. The word ‘brand’ derives from the Old Norse word

‘brandr’ which means to burn and brands were, and still are, the means by which

owners of livestock marked their animals. From branding his livestock, early man

moved on to branding his wares- where a potter for example would identify his pots


6

by putting a mark like a thumbprint into the wet clay on the bottom of the pot and the

potter would expect customers to seek out those products which carried his mark

(Interbrand,1990). Today with a considerable change over time, there is an increase in

modern and sophisticated branding of both tangibles and intangibles.

Aaker (1997) asserts that brand is a complex symbol and presents six levels of

meaning that convey it: Attributes: A brand brings to mind certain attributes; Benefits:

Attributes being translated into functional and emotional benefits; Values: The brand

also says something about the producer’s values; Culture: The brand may represent a

certain culture; Personality: The brand can project a certain personality; User: The

brand suggests the kind of consumer who buys or uses the product.

Brand names have become increasingly valuable assets for many multinational

companies. In a cluttered marketplace, brands stand up as the source of differentiation

for providers of products and services that can be quickly tracked with easy access to

technology and information (Lim and O’Cass, 2001). Many consumers use brands as

clues to indicate product performances, instead of engaging themselves in search for

information when deciding between competing brands. Consumers use brands as cues

to make decisions to purchase or try products (Ger et al., 1993). Monroe and Krishnan

(1985) define cue as all informational stimuli available to the consumer before

consumption, and can be intrinsic or extrinsic. Few examples of intrinsic cues are

taste and design, while extrinsic cues include COO, brand, and price (Rao and

Monroe, 1989). It is said that consumers tend to rely more on extrinsic cues (Jacoby et

al., 1977). Moreover, Han and Terpstra (1988) assert that consumers utilize extrinsic

cues in evaluating a brand because they often are unable to detect its true intrinsic


7

quality. It is also said that country-of-origin is also found to be one of these extrinsic

cues to a greater extent as consumers tend to be less familiar with products of foreign

origin.

To a large extent, the brands also speak of familiarity and credibility (Fatt, 1997)

about the product. In developing economies, consumer choice is significantly

increasing. However, in the early stages of economic transformation, there is little

information available to the consumer. Thus, consumers in transitioning economies

rely on cues from brands by default (Reardon et al, 2005). In less-developed

countries, many brands are still desired and trusted for their functional values and in

these markets, for many people, it is often enough that a brand has a guaranteed origin

and a guaranteed consistency of quality (Interbrand, 1998). Brands are used as a

surrogate to inform the consumer about the product, including relative product quality

since direct experience with a product is not available (Rao, 1972).

Forty years ago, a British or American housewife might have performed all her

domestic cleaning chores with only three or four branded products, but now she may

have twenty or thirty specialist products for floors, baths, windows, stubborn stains,

tiles, fabrics, toilet bowls, even chandeliers. Brands provide consumers with a means

of shopping with confidence, even when faced with bewildering choice (Interbrand,

1990).

Doyle (2002) asserts that brands are bought by consumers for emotional as well as

functional reasons. It is also said that people use brands to show off their lifestyles,


8

interests, values or wealth. Not only customers choose brands that they perceive as

meeting their ‘needs’, but also for gaining a sense of belonging, esteem, etc..

Brand attitudes are a central construct of marketing and have received wide attention

(Gardner and Houston, 1986). Both the short- and long-term health of a business are

dependent upon the brand image of a firm’s products, as brand equity can lead to

higher market share, increasing brand loyalty, and being able to charge premium

prices (Chaudhuri and Holbrook, 2001). It is increasingly significant to know what

local and global brands are and how they differ from each other before reviewing the

core concepts regarding the study.

2.3. Local Brands and Global Brands

Local brands are defined by Wolfe (1991) as brands that exist in one country or in a

limited geographical area. It is also noted by Schuiling et al (2004) that local brands

belong to a local, international, or global firm. Local brands provide a link between

the national economy and individual well-being. Levitt (1983) defines global brands

as brands that use the same marketing strategy and mix in all target markets.

Johansson and Ronkainen (2004) assert that global brands benefit from the scale and

scope of having presence in multiple markets. The researchers define global brand as

“a brand that is marketed under the same name in multiple countries with similar and

centrally coordinated marketing strategies.” However there are some selected global

brands that don’t have the same name but share some marketing program elements.

For example, “Mr. Clean” also sells under the “Mr. Proper” and “Maestro Limpio”

names, among others. Although global brands play a dominant role in today’s world,


9

the advantages of the local brands are still stronger and this is reviewed in the

following part.

2.4. Pros and Cons of Local brands and global brands

An exploratory research on the Y&R (Young & Rubicam’s) database was conducted

by Schuiling et al (2004) across four largest European countries: the United Kingdom,

Germany, France, and Italy. The study affirms that local brands benefit from strong

brand equity and specifically, local brands benefit from higher consumer awareness

than international brands do, and they enjoy a strong brand image. Local brands

benefit not only from a good quality image but also from a better value and trust

perception than international brands do (Holt et al, 2003). Value is linked with the fact

that prices of local brands are usually lower than those of international brands,

providing consumers a sense of better value for the money (Schuiling et al, 2004).

According to the research by Schuiling et al, (2004), local brands are also perceived

as more “down to earth” than international brands, meaning that local brands offer a

more basic/no frills brand proposition. The study also indicates that local brands are

perceived as more traditional than international brands, because local brands are

linked more to local traditions and local cultures than international brands are. It was

also found that trust is an important advantage for local brands, because it provides a

unique relationship with consumers that take years to develop. It also indicated that

there is no significant difference between the perception of prestige for international

brands and that for local brands. Another significant finding was that consumers are

attracted to international brands but in reality, they prefer to purchase local brands

(Schuiling et al., 2004). In the words of Johansson and Ronkainen (2004), although


10

global brands may have more success in high-profile, high-involvement categories,

consumers may still give local brands preference in purchasing every day products.

The advantages cherished by local brands can be dominated by the enormous

advantages enjoyed by global brands. Eckhardt (2005) avows that local brands are not

more flexible than global brands in terms of their marketing activities when they

compete in a foreign product category due to cultural categories being associated with

the product category. Just as global brands need to conform to international marketing

dictums, local brands sometimes need to conform to deeply held preconceptions about

the product category in which they operate.

Johansson and Ronkainen (2004) assessed brand realities on the global - local

continuum using data from Young & Rubicam’s Brand Asset Valuator (BAV). This

database is considered to be the most exhaustive of its kind, covering 20,000 brands

across 40 countries. Data have been collected since 1993 across a wide range of

industry sectors to measure brand perceptions of more than 100,000 consumers. It was

noted that local brands exhibit higher familiarity among consumers, but when

familiarity levels are similar, global brands enjoy higher levels of esteem. Also that

Global brands were known for their perceived quality. The researchers asserted that

global branding will arguably face different challenges by product category. Certain

categories, such as automobiles and computers, are deemed more global in terms of

the similarity in consumer preferences. Apart from discussing the pros and cons of

local and global brands, it is necessary to comprehend the shifts that occurred due to

increased consumer preference from local brands to global brands.


11

2.5. Shifts from Local Brands to Global Brands

During the recent years, a number of multinational companies are reducing their

brand portfolios to manageable sizes in favor of global brands. For example, both

Procter and Gamble (P&G) and Unilever have greatly pruned the number of brands

they market around the world, often disposing of those with limited global potential

(Pitcher, 1999). Massive presence of Global brands is fuelled by the increasing

similarity that consumers display in their consumption habits and preferences. It has

also been argued that Global brands, are perceived to be more value-added for the

consumer, either through better quality (as a function of worldwide acceptance) or by

enhancing the consumer’s self perception as being cosmopolitan, sophisticated and

modern (Johansson and Ronkainen, 2004). Consumers throughout the world are

becoming increasingly sophisticated and international brands offer a measure of

exclusivity or even eccentricity that are increasingly sought after and valued because

such appeals are universal (Interbrand, 1990). According to Schuiling et al (2004),

this trend has been occurring not only in fast moving consumer goods sector but also

in other industrial sector including services. Although global brands are becoming

more significant, it is asserted that there are many local brands than international

brands in Europe. As examples, in Germany’s oil industry, British Petroleum acquired

the local leader Aral and decided to retain the local brand name due to its strong brand

equity; In Belgium, Spa being the local leader in mineral water, has shares above

international leader Evian (Schuiling et al, 2004).

A number of reasons have been presented by various researchers for the moves

toward global brands. Out of which, the main reason would be the one given by

Hassan and Katsanis (1994), being meaningful segments of consumers around the


12

world develop similar needs and tastes. According to Neff (1999), globalization

speeds up a brand’s time to market by reducing time- consuming local modifications.

Another important reason given by Shocker et al. (1994) for moves toward global

brands would be consumer preference for brands with ‘global image’ over local

competitors, even when quality and value are not ‘objectively’ superior. Conversely,

in the view of Terpstra (1987), consumer preference has not has not been the primary

reason for companies to decide to move to international and global brands. As an

example, P&G accelerated its development of global brands since the early 1990s and

its aim being to achieve competitive advantage in markets (Schuiling et al 2004).

As the world is shrinking in to a global marketplace, it is increasingly significant to

understand the consumers’ perception of global brands to local brands. There is also

need to uncover the reasons for consumers’ preference for global brands over local

brands.

Consumers become perceptive to global brands when consumers believe the brand is

marketed in multiple countries and is recognized as global in these countries

(Steenkamp, 2003). This perception occurs in two forms; consumers realize that the

same brand is found in other countries through media exposure, word of mouth, or

during travel overseas. Secondly, as studied by Alden et al., (1999) that a brand may

assert or imply its ‘globalness’ through marketing communications that use brand

names, endorsers, advertising themes, etc.. Consumers prefer brands that they

perceive as originating from a non-local country, especially from Western countries,

more than they do local brands and that preference is linked not only to perceived

quality but also to social status (Alden et al., 1999). In the words of Peterson and


13

Jolibert (1995), consumers in developing countries generally seek to emulate western

consumption practices and lifestyles and purchase foreign brands. It is asserted that

considerable similarities exist in the needs of consumers around the world (Domzal

and Unger, 1987) And this convergence in consumer needs is largely attributed to

increased cross border population mobility and electronic mobility facilitated by

telecommunications technology (Quelch, 1999). On the other hand, there exists

differences between the markets of different countries due to factors such as culture,

history, and geography; and also there exists difference between many regions of the

world in the way consumers perceive products and brands (Lim and O’Cass, 2001).

This shift from local brands to global brands can be reinforced by the following basic

factors that effect consumer preference for global brands.

2.6. Basic factors that effect consumer preference for Global Brands

Research shows that perceived brand globalness for global brands could create

consumer perceptions of brand superiority (Shocker et al., 1994). International and

global brands have been associated with high prestige or status, in addition to quality

(Batra et al., 2000). Empirical study conducted by Steenkamp et al (2003) has

revealed that prestige is the second factor driving global brand preference. Foreign

brands of most consumer durables and non-durable categories were given

significantly higher mean attribute ratings on “status and esteem” except where “cold

drinks” and “ice creams” were concerned. A study conducted by Kinra (2006) held

that COO credibility of foreign brands was a significant factor influencing consumer

attitudes and preferences as it was correlated highly with “quality” and “status and

esteem”.


14

Steenkamp et al (2003) made a study on consumer preference for global brands to

local brands. The researchers framed three pathways through which perceived brand

globalness (PBG) influences consumers’ purchase likelihood were hypothesized. The

pathways were higher perceived quality, higher prestige, and the psychological

benefits of PBG. The hypotheses were tested in Korea and the United states, across

different product categories and brands.

Fig 1. Conceptual model of Perceived brand Globalness (Steenkamp et al., 2003)

The result of the study being PBG positively associated with both brand quality and

prestige. The researchers found that both in Korea and the U.S.A., PBG exerted its

strongest effect on purchase likelihood through perceptions of superior quality.

Although global brands were found to communicate higher prestige and status, quality

appears to be more heavily weighted by consumers. According to Han (1990), higher

perceived quality, higher prestige, and the psychological benefits of PBG are the


15

pathways through which PBG can directly affect purchase likelihood and indirectly

affect through brand quality and brand prestige.

Bearden and Etzel (1982) state that, if global brands have higher prestige, it would

because of their relative scarcity and higher price compared with local brands.

Consumers develop prestige meanings for brands based upon interactions with people

(e.g., aspired and/or peer reference group), object properties (e.g., best features), and

hedonic values (e.g., sensory beauty) (Vigneron and Johnson 1999). Kapferer (1997)

suggests that consumers may prefer foreign brands because of associations of higher

prestige. Steenkamp et al. (2002) argue that the influence of perceived prestige on

purchase intention is stronger when the product category is more conspicuous and its

ownership or consumption is more publicly visible. Furthermore Veblen (1899)

asserts that conspicuous consumption was used by consumers to signal wealth, power,

and status.

Despite exceptions (like Coca-Cola, Nestlé, etc...), evidence indicates that global

brands are typically more scarce and more expensive than local brands (Batra et al.,

2000). Global brands may also connote cosmopolitanism (Thompson and Tambyah,

1999). In the words of Friedman (1990), consumers are said to buy global brands to

enhance their self-image as being cosmopolitan, sophisticated, and modern.

The worldwide scale of global brands allows people to associate themselves with

globally recognized events (World Soccer Cup, Formula one, etc…) and celebrities

(Steffi Graf, Michael Schumacher, David Beckham, etc… for example). Through a


16

process of meaning transfer, the prestige attached to these events and celebrities may

be transferred to the sponsoring global brand (McCracken, 1986).

Brand name is a key indicator to quality (Rao and Monroe, 1989), and a global image

can arguably enhance the brand’s perceived quality (Steenkamp et al, 2003).

According to Kapferer (1997), if a brand is viewable as globally available, consumers

may attribute higher quality to the brand because such quality is likely to be thought

of as critical to global acceptance. According to Kirmani and Baumgartner (2000),

perceived quality is defined as a consumer’s evaluation of a brand’s overall

excellence based on intrinsic (e.g., performance, durability) and extrinsic cues (e.g.,

brand name, warranty).

Global brands often advertise their worldwide availability and acceptance (Alden et

al., 1999). There has been an enhanced appeal of global brands among certain

segments, such as teenagers and business people (Walker, 1996).

One of the other reasons for a global brand preference may be the globalness per se of

such brands, independent of any effects through prestige and quality. Perceived Brand

Globalness (PBG) by itself may also be an added value for consumers (Steenkamp et

al, 2003). Dawar and Parker (1994) asserted that global brands often appeal to human

universals and are purchased to signal membership in worldwide consumer segments.

This signifies that global brands are often seen by consumers as brands that convey

worldwide citizenship, when consumed. A number of authors (Appadurai, 1990;

Hannerz, 1990) note that media flows, increased travel, and other factors are creating

widely understood symbols and meanings reflected in global brands that, in turn,


17

communicate membership in the global consumer community with all its positive

connotations (McCracken, 1986). Although this was being said some twenty years

back, this condition has grown eventually stronger.

Although there are numerous factors for consumer preference for global brands,

consumer ethnocentrism (CET) is considered to have moderating influence in

consumer perception of global brands.

2.7. Consumer Ethnocentrism and evaluation of global brands and local brands

by consumers

Although some consumers prefer global brands to local brands, Shimp and Sharma

(1987) have said that the phenomenon of consumer ethnocentrism (CET), wherein a

well- established bias exists among consumers in favor of home- grown products.

Zambuni (1993) believes that there is evidence that many consumers prefer brands

with strong local connections.

Consumer Ethnocentrism (CET) is defined as ‘the beliefs held by consumers about

the appropriateness, indeed morality, of purchasing foreign made products’ (Shimp

and Sharma, 1987). As defined by Kinra (2006), Consumer ethnocentrism is a

psychological construct representing how consumers view products made in their own

country markets as objects of pride and identity versus those from other country

markets. Ethnocentricity has substantial implications for consumer attitude formation

towards foreign products/brands, their purchase intentions and choice between

domestic versus foreign-made products (Reardon et al, 2005).


18

According to Steenkamp et al (2003) ethnocentric consumers take pride in their

country’s brands, symbols, and culture. They are less open to foreign cultures, and are

less cosmopolitan. Purchasing foreign made products may be seen as immoral and

unpatriotic because it has an adverse impact on the domestic economy; hence,

consumers tend to purchase local products even if the quality is lower than that of

imports (Wall and Heslop, 1986).

CET is closely linked to economic nationalism (Baughn and Yapark, 1996).

According to Shimp and Sharma (1987), consumer characteristics such as nationalism

and domestic country preference have been known to have a moderating influence on

foreign brands. Kinra (2006), asserts that this moderating influence on foreign brands

is consistent with the fact that consumer ethnocentrism is contingent not only on the

domestic country culture that espouses it, but also the quality of domestic products

coming from it. According to Baughn and Yapark (1996), ethnocentric consumers

may even be willing to sacrifice ‘objective’ gain (higher quality, prestige, etc.) to

enjoy the psychological benefit of avoiding contact with the out-group (i.e., the global

culture) by purchasing local brands.

According to Vida and Fairhurst (1999), Consumer ethnocentric attitudes can be rated

on a continuum from highly ethnocentric to non-ethnocentric, whereby a consumer at

the high end of the spectrum believes that purchasing foreign-made products is

morally wrong. In contrast, highly non ethnocentric consumers may judge foreign

products based on their attributes and/or view them as better because they are not

produced in their own country. Consumers who are low on CET are more

cosmopolitan in outlook and have a higher degree of cultural openness. Supphellen


19

and Gronhaug (2003) state that, in transitional economies, low ethnocentric

consumers may have positive stereotypes of foreign brands, whereas high

ethnocentric viewers tend to reject brands merely because they are foreign. Batra et

al., (2000) asserts that ethnocentrism is unlikely to affect brand attitudes in the least

developed transitional economies due to the fact that foreign brands are perceived to

be measurably better than most locally produced brands.

Wang and Lamb (1980) found that consumers in developed countries tend to prefer

their own locally-produced goods first, followed by products from other developed

countries, and then products from less developed countries. In a detailed telephone

survey of 1,000 consumers across the region of United States, conducted just prior to

the war, the aim was to compare American brands to local brands and looking across

a whole host of categories. It was found that, the most established American brands in

the survey were in fact regarded as more global than American. They were more

likely to be better assimilated into the culture of the country and to be seen to have

that country's interests at heart than even some local brands. And they were more

likely to enjoy increased purchase intent in the future (Richard, 2003).

On the other hand, Baker and Michie (1995) examined British car drivers' perceptions

of, and attitudes towards, four makes of foreign cars: Honda, Hyundai, Proton, and

Toyota. A British car (Rover) was also added to the study in order to establish the

possible effects of ethnocentrism on intention to buy. A detailed description for each

model was provided in the exhibit; however, no reference was made to price or

country of origin. The study revealed that respondents preferred the most expensive

cars (Toyota and Rover) but some of them changed their decision when informed that


20

the prices of these two makes were 50 per cent higher than an available alternative.

The results also indicated that product country images and ethnocentrism had a

significant impact (both positive and negative) on the consumers' intention to buy.

Furthermore it was revealed ethnocentrism can be a strong source of competitive

advantage, especially when domestic products are equal to imported products on a

price-performance basis.

Previous studies on Eastern European countries namely, Russian (Johansson et al.,

1994), and Hungarian consumers (Papadoupoulos et al, 1993), has been found to

show that consumers prefer Western products because of superior quality, despite

consumer ethnocentric tendencies (Kinra, 2006). In a cross-cultural study by Vida and

Fairhurst (1999), in Central Europe, the study revealed significant differences in

consumer ethnocentrism across the four countries investigated. In studying

antecedents of consumer ethnocentrism, the researchers established a positive

relationship between consumer familiarity with and knowledge of international brands

and their ethnocentric attitudes across the four countries.

In order to study consumer perception, it is significant to review concepts of

consumer brand knowledge.

2.8. Consumer Brand Knowledge

There has been a plenty of research about consumer brand knowledge and its impacts

on consumer behavior. According to Keller (1993), consumer brand knowledge

determines how a consumer thinks about a brand. It also determines how the

consumer responds to different stimuli regarding a brand (Lim and O’Cass, 2001).


21

Rossiter and Percy (1987) assert that brand awareness is a major component of brand

knowledge that is reflected by a consumer’s ability to identify a brand under different

conditions and is related to the strength of the brand node or trace in memory.

Consumers tend to generalize their attitudes and opinions across products from a

given country, based on their familiarity and background with the country, and their

own personal experiences of product attributes such as “technological superiority”,

“product quality”, “design”, “value for money”, “status and esteem”, and “credibility

of country-of-origin” of a brand (Kinra, 2006). Country of Origin (COO) effects plays

a vital role in studying consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands.

2.9. Effects of Country-of-Origin (COO), Culture-of-Brand Origin (COBO) and

consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands

According to Al-Sulaiti and Baker (1998), among the many factors that are believed

to influence consumer perceptions of products in an age of international competition,

country-of-origin (COO) effects, remains the most researched. Kinra (2006) asserts

that COO is considered an important differentiating factor in consumer attitudes to

foreign and local brand names. COO has been defined as the country where the

corporate headquarters of the company marketing the product or brand is situated

(Johansson, J.K. et al, 1985). Lee and Schaninger (1996) define COO as the country-

of-manufacture or assembly. Research works have documented the importance of

country-of-origin (COO) image in consumer evaluation of foreign products and

brands and also favorable country perceptions are known to lead to favorable

perceptions of associated attributes such as product quality indicating thereby, that

consumer evaluations are governed by influences other than the quality of the product


22

(Peterson and Jolibert, 1995). According to Samiee (1994), one key drawback of

COO studies is the priori assumption that “customers were typically knowledgeable

or sought to acquire CO/M (country origin/manufacturing) information, and that CO

is a salient attribute in their decisions and that this assumption clearly biased the effect

size because all consumers are not the same with regard to the influence of COO. The

literature has clearly paid insufficient attention to this customer difference in their

awareness and perceived salience of COO”.

Ghauri and Cateora (2006) defines COO effect as any influence that the country of

manufacture has on consumer’s positive or negative perception of a product. The

researchers also assert that when the consumer is aware of the country of origin, there

is the possibility that the place of manufacture will affect product/ brand image. Iyer

and Kalita (1997) revealed from a study that COO has been found to reflect

consumers’ general perceptions about the quality of products made in a foreign

country, along with the nature of people from that country. In a study by Eroglu and

Machleit (1989) in the case with consumer durables, a product’s technical complexity

affects the importance given to consumer evaluations and that, the more complex the

product, the more relevant the COO cue.

Many brands use cues that are either implied in the brand name or in promotional

appeals in order to elicit perceived country of origin associations (Agarwal and

Kamakura, 1999). According to Thakor and Lavack (2003), these perceived origin

associations are a powerful source of brand appeal, as marketers have revealed

through focusing advertising on origin associations in many product categories. As

examples asserted by the researchers, Porsche ads often show a German test track, to


23

reinforce its German origin; Christian Dior uses the French word, “Parfum”, in its

advertising to reinforce its French origin association. Brand has been considered as a

purely extrinsic variable in country-of-origin effects and consumer perceptions of

origin have been manipulated almost solely through the “made in” label information

(Mohamad et al., 2000). Papadopoulos (1993) asserts that there are a variety of ways

in which origin information can be communicated, specifically through brand name.

According to Kinra (2006), foreign brand names are frequently associated with the

country-of-origin (COO) of the brand. Papadoupoulos et al. (1993) asserts that

consumer perceptions of a product’s COO are based on three components associated

with the standard attitude model, namely their “cognitions” which include knowledge

about specific products and brands, consumer “affect” or favorable/unfavorable

attitude towards the COO, and their “conative” behavior which is related to actual

purchase of a foreign brand. Leclerc et al. (1994) uses the term “foreign branding” to

describe the approach of spelling or pronouncing a brand name in a foreign language,

using brands such as Egoiste fragrance, Frusen Gladje ice cream, as examples.

Conversely, in the words of Kinra (2006), there are product categories not

distinctively associated with any COO image as in the case of the car industry, where

it has been less easy to market global brands such as “Mercedes”, “Audi”, “Toyota”,

“Jaguar” for which brand images have developed quite apart from their COO, and

which do not use their national COO association in their promotion and marketing

strategies. A study by Leclerc et al. (1994) revealed that perceptions of brand

nationality were manipulated through French/ English pronunciation. It was also

found that for hedonic products, the brand name was preferred when the French

pronunciation was used. Furthermore, the French pronunciation resulted in more


24

favorable brand attitudes. In another study made by Harris et al. (1994), it was

revealed that English brand names were preferred to French and German brand

names. Thakor and Lavack (2003) states that the studies conducted by Leclerc et al.

(1994) and Harris et al. (1994) suggest that brand origin associations play a

potentially powerful role in the formation of brand attitudes. Erickson, et al. (1984)

analysed the country of origin effects on the evaluation of automobile brands. Data

were collected from 96 MBA students at the University of Washington. Subjects were

asked about their beliefs and attitudes towards ten automobile models (e.g. four US,

two German and four Japanese models). The study revealed that country of origin

affects beliefs but not attitudes. It also indicated that the effect of image variables on

attitude was not direct; any influence they have appeared to be a secondary one acting

through beliefs.

According to Kinra (2006), previous studies on foreign brands reveal that foreign

brands serve as symbolic acquisitions communicative of social distinctions in

negotiating status and prestige and this incidence exists in country markets where

economic transition and income disparities are high and, social mobility magnifies the

tendency to claim differential status through the brands one consumes. Consumers

perceive foreign brand that it might have superior quality because of its developed

nation origin is certainly likely (Batra et al., 2000; Leclerc and Schmitt, 1994).

Conversely, Gaedeke (1973) found that CO information did not significantly affect

opinions regarding the quality of branded products.

According to Thakor and Lavack (2003), though COO studies rely heavily on the

“made in” information, such information is not expected to be the only factor in


25

determining brand origin perceptions. The researcher asserts that there are multiple

antecedents of brand origin (such as location of ownership, location of manufacture,

location of assembly, etc…) and from which consumers draw brand origin cues. And

these cues help consumers to formulate perceived brand origins, which they use to

devise more general perceptions, attitudes, expectations and intentions about the

brand.

Conversely, it is said that the view of COO effects is increasingly becoming

misleading or confusing in the modern marketplace as products are typically designed

in one country, manufactured in another, and assembled in another and this has

resulted in a hybrid of products (Chao, 1993). In the words of Lim and O’Cass (2001),

Country-of-origin research has revealed two crucial facts about how the origin of a

product influences consumer behaviour – people tend to prefer products from their

home country and have a more negative perception of brands from “emerging

economies”. In a study by Nes and Bilkey (1993), it was found that products from

developing and less developed countries were rated lower on quality and higher in

risk regardless of brand name.

Level of education is considered to be significant demographic variable (Al-Sulaiti

and Baker, 1998) influencing country of origin effect (Paswan and Sharma, 2004). As

education levels increase, consumers are likely to become more knowledgeable of

other countries and cultures, and more tolerant of things that are different. It has also

been posited to result in more favorable opinion towards foreign products (Good and

Huddleston, 1995; Sharma et al., 1995) and a reduction in consumer ethnocentrism

(Bailey and Pineres, 1997). Paswan and Sharma (2004) suggest that as a consumer’s


26

education level increases their awareness of brand and hence brand’s COO should

also increase.

Lim and O’Cass (2001) assert that The COO effects have been shifted from the

product level to the brand level in consumers’ product evaluations. It is also said that

specific country-of-origin information is becoming less relevant for the fact that it is

becoming increasingly difficult for consumers to extract the multiplicity of country

information. The researchers also state that in place of country-of-origin is the

culture-of-brand-origin (COBO), which is more readily available to the consumer as a

result of exposure to the marketing activities of the brand. It is also stated that COBO

is argued here to provide the next wave of understanding in how consumers perceive

and evaluate brands. Thakor and Kohli (1996) define brand origin as “the place,

region or country to which a brand is perceived to belong by its target consumers”.

They also advise that the origin of manufacture (country-of-origin) is no longer

significant to buying behaviour in the age of corporate globalisation, and that the

perceived origin of the brand is more suggestive as a demographic variable. For

example, many perfume labels bear the names of major cities: 'Paris Milan New York

Rome London' ... No one assumes that the perfume is actually made in any of the

cities, but their names carry the suggestion of quality and tradition. A bottle labelled

'Prague Helsinki Melbourne Moscow' would not carry the same sense of gravitas or

mystique, regardless of whether it might be of a better quality (Lindstrom, 2005). As

asserted by Lim and O’Cass (2001), consumers judge products by referring to the

brand and it is the national or cultural associations of that brand that matter rather than

the precise details of product manufacture and no consumer doubts that a Coca Cola is

an American brand but the bottling of the product takes place locally. Thus it is


27

asserted that the cultural associations of the brand that matters. Culture-of-brand-

origin could be the reason why consumers still attach certain cultural characteristics to

a brand when specific information about the foreign country is not available. For

example, consumers evaluated Volkswagon Fox favourably in a study because of its

image as a brand of exceptional engineering based on its German origins and only 8

percent of the respondents knew it was manufactured in Brazil (Ratliff, 1989). As

examples given by Thakor and Lavack (2003), Guinness does not become less Irish

for the average UK consumer by being made in London and those same consumers

still see Toyota as a Japanese car despite it being manufactured at Derby; BMW is by

itself a German brand regardless of whether the cars are made in Munich or

Manchester.

In a study made by Lim and O’Cass (2001), the researchers examined consumer’s

perception of brands as influenced by their origins and the differences in classification

ability between consumers’ knowledge levels. The results of the study indicate that

consumers can more easily identify the cultural origin of brands over the country-of-

origin. In the view of the researchers, the issue of consumer brand knowledge is

important in order to understand how consumers perceive information about origins

of a brand and ultimately perceive and evaluate brands and also that consumers are

believed to be able to classify culture-of-brand-origin better than country-of-brand-

origin.

There are few studies that have shown that consumers may prefer brands with local

connections, and few researchers have argued that there is no intrinsic preference for

global brands (De Mooij, 1998). Higher levels of domestic country bias have been


28

found in research on Western consumers where domestic products were found to

enjoy a generally more favourable evaluation than foreign made products (Bannister

and Saunders, 1978; Cattin et al., 1982). Han (1989) had asserted that consumers tend

to evaluate local products more highly than foreign products. Balabanis and

Diamantopoulos (2004) studied eight product categories with regard to consumer

preferences for domestic versus foreign brands and found that ethnocentrism was also

dependent to a large extent, on the nature of the product category.

2.10. Conclusion

The literature review has discussed concepts and theories regarding the basics of

global brands and local brands, the shifts from local brands to global brands and also

the factors leading to the shift. Country-of-Origin effects are reviewed in order to

examine its influence on consumer perception of global brands to local brands. It is

highly significant to highlight that studies on foreign brands by researchers (such as

Kinra, 2006) foreign brands serve as symbolic acquisitions communicative of social

distinctions in negotiating status and prestige and this incidence exists in country

markets where economic transition and income disparities are high and, social

mobility magnifies the tendency to claim differential status through the brands one

consumes. Consumers perceive foreign brand that it might have superior quality

because of its developed nation origin is certainly likely (Batra et al., 2000; Leclerc

and Schmitt, 1994). The literature review also appraises the effects of consumer

ethnocentrism in the purchase of global brands and local brands.

To proceed this study further, the next chapter talks about the car industry in India.

The reason for explaining the car industry in India is because this specific sector in


29

India is tremendously growing with both global players and local players in the

market. Further more, another reason for choosing the car industry is because people

(consumers) in the country like cars and they are more concerned about carefully

deciding and buying a car. They are considered to be among the high involvement

products. Thus, this would enforce the study as it is to study the consumer perception

on global brands vs. local brands.


30

Chapter Three

3. Industry Overview

3.1. Introduction

The car industry in India is chosen for studying consumer perception of global brands

vs. local brands for the simple reason being the strong growth of the automobile

sector in India. The car segment is specifically chosen as it is highly competitive with

well established and flourishing global and local brands.

3.2. Indian automobile industry – an Overview

India is emerging as one of the most attractive automotive markets in the world, and is

poised to become a key sourcing base for auto components. The Indian automotive

sector has a presence across all vehicle segments and key components. In terms of

volume, two wheelers dominate the sector, with nearly 80 per cent share, followed by

passenger vehicles with 13 per cent. Passenger vehicles consist of passenger cars and

utility vehicles. The industry had few players and was protected from global

competition till the 1990s. After government lifted licensing in 1993, 17 new ventures

have come up. At present, there are 12 manufacturers of passenger cars, 5

manufacturers of multi utility vehicles (MUVs), 9 manufacturers of commercial

vehicles, 12 of two wheelers and 4 of three wheelers, besides 5 manufacturers of

engines. With the arrival of global players, the sector has become highly competitive

(Automotive, 2006).

The growth curve of Indian automobile industry has been on an upswing for the past

few years. It is the 4th largest passenger vehicle market in Asia and has become the


31

fastest growing car market in the world in 2004, with a growth rate of 20 per cent.

Continuing the upswing, the sector posted an impressive 8.9 per cent growth in 2005-

06, says the Economic Survey 2005-06. The latest announcement by the Government

to cut excise duty on small cars will soon see India emerging as the world's largest

manufacturing hub for small or compact cars (IBEF, 2006).

Indian automobile companies are moving aggressively into foreign markets. As a

good example, Tata Motors Ltd., which is one of the largest private sector

commenced its distribution of Fiat cars across India as part of the new Tata-Fiat

dealer network, is also looking at tapping overseas markets through the partnership.

The company is gearing up to re-launch its best selling passenger car, Indica, in the

United Kingdom under its own brand. Indica had made its debut on the British roads

about two years ago as City Rover under Tata Motors' tie-up with the Birmingham-

based MG Rover (IBEF, 2006). With few such movements happening tremendously,

it wouldn’t be too long for India to have its brands on the international roads.

Apart from the automobile brands moving aggressively into the foreign markets, there

are huge foreign brands rolling on the roads of India. The year 2006 will see the entry

of many high-end brands into the country. The Indian automobile market will see at

least 30 new launches, spanning everything from affordable hatchbacks to mid-size

models to super luxury high-end cars and Sports Utility Vehicles (SUVs) (IBEF,

2006).


32

Fig 2. Strong growing automotive sector in both domestic and global markets

(IBEF, 2006)

Thus the Indian automobile industry has been performing well both in the domestic

and the international markets.

According to IBEF (India Brand Equity Foundation), India has several competitive

advantages in the automobile sector and they can be explained as following; India has

a growing workforce that is English-speaking, highly skilled and trained in designing

and machining skills required by the automotive and engineering industries. Many

Indian and global players are leveraging this advantage by increasingly outsourcing

activities like design and R&D to their Indian arms.


33

India offers a huge growth opportunity for the automobile sector – the domestic

market is large and has the potential to grow further in the future due to positive

demographic trends and the current low penetration levels. India has nearly 23 per

cent of the global population and is one of the most attractive consumer markets in the

world today. Income levels across population segments have been growing in India.

According to National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) data, the

consuming class, with an annual income of US$ 980 or above, is growing and is

expected to constitute over 80 per cent of the population by 2009-10 (IBEF, 2006).

In addition, a large proportion of the Indian population is relatively young - in the age

group of 20-59 years. This is expected to further boost the automotive domestic

market as a younger population has a higher consumption index. The rise in income

levels of the Indians and the emergence of the consuming class that has higher

propensity to spend offers great opportunities for growth to companies across various

sectors. Furthermore, Consumers in India are now more informed, sophisticated and

demanding. Urban consumers have been especially exposed to western lifestyles

through overseas travel. For example, more than 5 million Indians traveled overseas

last year and this number is expected to increase by 15 per cent to 20 per cent per

annum. An increase in the number of working women and the prevalence of nuclear

double-income families, especially in urban areas, are other trends shaping lifestyles

(IBEF, 2006).

According to IBEF, large infrastructure development projects underway in India

combined with favorable government policies will also drive automotive growth in


34

the next few years. Easy availability of finance and moderate cost of financing

facilitated by double income families will also increase consumption.

3.3. Advent of cars in India

The advent of cars in India dates back to 1898 when the first motorcar rode down

India’s roads. From then till the First World War, about 4,000 cars were directly

imported to India from foreign manufacturers. During 1948, the first car was

manufactured in India. In 1993, with the winds of liberalization sweeping the Indian

car market, many multinationals like Daewoo, Peugeot, general Motors, Mercedes-

Benz and Fiat came into the Indian car market. Since the 80s, the Indian car Industry

has seen a major resurgence with the opening up of Indian shores to foreign

manufacturers and collaborators. The 90s became the melting point for the car

industry in India. The consumer being the king, was constantly wooed by both the

Indian and foreign manufacturers. Though sales had taken a dip in the first few

months of 1999, it is back to boom time (http://auto.indiamart.com/cars/birth-

car.html). High- end models are being launched rapidly and are flourishing.

As already said, Indian automobile industry is highly competitive with a large number

of players in each industry segment. Most of the global majors are present in the

passenger vehicle and two wheeler segments. The key players in passenger vehicles

segment in India are Tata Motors, Maruti Udyog, Honda Motors, Hyundai Motors,

Toyota, Skoda, Daimler Chrysler, and Hindustan Motors. Mercedes, BMW, Porsche,

Audi, Bentley and Rolls Royce are already here (IBEF, 2006).


35

Brief descriptions of both local and global car brands in India are presented below to

enhance the comprehension of the study. Local car brands in India are initially

described before pursuing to global car brands.

3.4. Local Car Brands in India

The local car brands found in India are;

Maruti Udyog Limited is the premier car company in India. Maruti Udyog Limited

(MUL) was established in Feb 1981. The company entered into collaboration with

Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan to manufacture cars. Maruti is the highest volume

car manufacturer in Asia, outside Japan and Korea. Despite there being 11 companies

now in the passenger car market in India, Maruti holds about 60% of the total market

share. Maruti Udyog Limited has many unique Service advantages for the customers.

It has bagged the First Position in JD Power Customer Satisfaction Index for the

consecutive two years. The company has also ranked highest in the India Sales

Satisfaction Study. The models of Maruti Udyog Limited cars are Maruti 800, Maruti

Alto, Maruti Zen, Maruti Zen Classic, Maruti Esteem, Maruti Gypsy, Omni, Wagon

R, Versa, Baleno, Swift and Grand Vitara (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Hindustan Motors Limited (HML) is India's renowned automobile manufacturing

company. In 1942 this company was introduced in India by Mr. B.M. Birla of Birla

family (India's largest business groups). Since then, it has become a vast company,

manufacturing cars like Ambassador, Contessa, and in collaboration with Mitsubishi

of Japan now manufactures the new Mitsubishi Lancer (www.auto.indiamart.com).


36

Tata Motors Limited is India's largest automobile company, with large revenues. Its

name comes first in the category of commercial vehicles and the second largest in the

passenger vehicles, mid size car and utility vehicle segments. The company is the

world's fifth largest medium and heavy commercial vehicle manufacturer. Over 3.5

million Tata vehicles are moving on Indian roads, since 1954. The models of the

company are Tata Indigo, Tata Indica, Tata Sumo, Tata Safari and Tata Indigo Marina

(www.auto.indiamart.com).

3.5. Global Car Brands in India

Apart from local car brands, the global car brands present in India are;

Hyundai Motor India Limited (HMIL) was established in 1996 and is a wholly owned

subsidiary of South Korean multi national, Hyundai Motor Company. HMIL is the

fastest growing and the second largest car manufacturer in India and presently selling

30 variants of passenger cars in six segments. The Company has set up more than 70

dealer workshops that are equipped with the latest technology, machinery, and

international quality press, body and paint shops, across the country, thereby

providing a one-stop shop for a Hyundai customer. Hyundai also has a fleet of 78

emergency road service cars that can provide emergency service to all its customers

anytime, anywhere. The models of Hyundai are Santro, Getz, Accent, Elantra, Sonata,

Tucson, Terracan. The awaited models of Hyundai Motors are Verna, Getz next

generation and Santa Fe (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Honda Siel Cars India Ltd., (HSCI) was set up in December 1995 as a joint venture

between Honda Motor Co. Ltd., Japan and Siel Limited to manufacture passenger cars

in India. The company has brought about three models in India - Honda City, Honda


37

Accord, and Honda CR-V. Its first model was launched in 1997. Very recently Honda

Siel Cars has launched one more market friendly model, Honda Civic on 9th July

2006 in India (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Toyota Motor Corporation is the premium vehicle manufacturer in the world. Based

in Japan, the company manufactured its first vehicle in 1936. Toyota exported its first

Japanese-made passenger car to the United States in 1957. Today Toyota has global

presence and Toyota branded vehicles rank among the world's highest quality cars. In

India Toyota Motor Corporation has entered into a joint venture with Kirloskar Group

and the new entity is called Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited (TKM). The

company aims to play a major role in the development of Indian automotive industry

(www.iloveindia.com).

Daewoo Motors is a South Korean company. General Motors took decision to take up

Daewoo Motors to form GM Daewoo. This brand entered the Indian market during

the year 2002 with its models such as Daewoo Matiz, Daewoo Cielo, and Daewoo

Nexia (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Ford Motor Company is the world's second largest automaker. The company's world

headquarters is in Dearborn, Michigan. Its automotive brands include Aston Martin,

Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, Lincoln, Mazda, Mercury and Volvo. The brands on Indian

roads include Ford Icon, Ford Mondeo, Ford Fiesta, Ford Fusion, Ford Escort and

Ford Endeavor. The company is also waiting for Ford Focus to be launched in India

shortly (www.auto.indiamart.com).


38

Fiat, a make from Italy stepped in India during the year 1905 and later on joined

hands with Premium Automobiles which was a private company in India

(www.auto.indiamart.com).

General Motors Corporation was founded in 1908 and is the world's largest vehicle

manufacturer (www.iloveindia.com). General Motors enlisted its name for making

outstanding future performance in the field of automobile industry in India from the

year 1994. The models of General motors in India are Chevrolet Aveo, Chevrolet

Optra and Chevrolet Tavera, Opel Astra and Opel Corsa (www.auto.indiamart.com).

German based company Audi has spreaded its wings of success in the field of

automobile industry for its technical expertise and creativity. Audi has already started

leaving its footprint in India from July 2004. Audi has launched its bigger models A6

and A8 in the Indian market (www.auto.indiamart.com).

BMW (Bayerische Motoren Werke) was founded on March 7, 1916 and is now one of

the major automobile manufacturers in the international market. Its major brands

include BMW, MINI and Rolls-Royce Motor Cars. Although its cars are on Indian

roads, it has been announced that 2007 will be the year when BMW will start

manufacturing and selling cars in India (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Czech Republic based Skoda Auto Company is one of the popular brand name in the

field of automobile industry. It is a part of the international Volkswagen Group.

Skoda Auto introduced itself in Indian market in November 2001. The models of


39

Skoda cars on Indian roads are Skoda Octavia, Skoda Superb and Skoda Laura. The

awaited models are Skoda Fabia and Roomster (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Daimler Chrysler entered the Indian market and set up Mercedes-Benz India Ltd.

during 1994 with the aim to serve the customers in India with the latest products and

technological excellence from the Mercedes-Benz (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Rolls-Royce Motor Cars was introduced by Frederick Henry Royce and Charles

Stewart Rolls on May 4, 1904. Rolls-Royce model, Phantom is already in the roads of

India (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Porsche was established by Ferdinand Porsche. In 1931, Ferdinand Porsche founded

the Porsche Engineering Office in Stuttgart. Porsche started leaving its footprint in the

market of luxury and utility vehicle in India from 2003 (www.auto.indiamart.com).

Thus, these descriptions of the global and local car brands would enhance the reading

in a better manner. This also depicts India’s richness in automobiles and particularly

in cars. The study is prolonged by presenting the research methodology that has been

adopted for the study, in the next chapter.


40

Chapter Four 4. Research Methodology

4.1. Introduction

This chapter talks about the methods and techniques of data collection and selects the

most appropriate method for the study based on the strengths and weaknesses of each

method.

The data collection methods used in this research involves the search for both primary

and secondary data. According to Malhotra (2005), Primary data are originated by the

researcher for the specific purpose of addressing the problem at hand. Also that

obtaining primary data can be expensive and time consuming. Primary data, being the

most significant is gathered through depth interviews, focus groups, observations and

surveys. This particular study has used depth interviews as a means for obtaining

primary data.

Secondary data are data that are collected for some purpose other than the problem at

hand (Malhotra, 2005). Secondary data are usually collected from journals, existing

reports, and statistics by public and private authorities. The secondary data for this

particular study were collected through marketing journals and other existing reports

that were based on the topic. Secondary data helped the researcher to create better

comprehension of consumer perceptions. As a general rule stated by Malhotra (2005),

“Examination of available secondary data is a prerequisite to the collection of primary

data. Start with secondary data. Proceed to primary data only when the secondary data


41

sources have been exhausted or yield managerial returns.” Thus the study conducted

and analysed primary data with the rationale of the secondary data.

Since the aim of the study was to understand consumers’ view of global brands vs.

local brands, qualitative research was preferred to quantitative research. In order to

create a deep understanding of consumers’ insights of global brand against local

brands, qualitative approach was adopted with an in-depth and semi- structured

interview process. Interviews as a qualitative tool helped the researcher to uncover

individual’s covert feelings and emotions towards perception of global brands vs.

local brands. As it was rightly said by Bate (1997) that qualitative research is about

digging into the everyday life of people. It is also that qualitative research produces a

quality in a research that no other method gives, and provides a unique way of

illustrating and explaining theoretical issues in everyday, experimental terms.

4.2. Research purpose

The purpose of this study is to understand consumers’ perception of global brands vs.

local brands in the Indian car industry. The secondary objectives of the study are to

highlight the factors that effect consumer preference for global brands; to examine the

effects of country of origin on consumer perceptions of global brands and local

brands; and to study the effects of consumer ethnocentrism towards global brands.

The study originally achieves the secondary objectives in order to accomplish the

primary objective.

The research explores consumers’ perceptions of global brand vs. local brands in the

Indian car industry. The study is conducted among the adult consumers in the age

group of 30-60 years old.


42

The study undertakes exploratory research in order create a better understanding of

the consumers. According to Malhotra (2005), the objective of exploratory research is

to explore or search through a problem or situation to provide insights and

understanding. The research process of an exploratory research is flexible and

unstructured and the sample size is small and non-representative. The analysis of the

exploratory research is qualitative and the results are tentative in nature (Malhotra,

2005).

4.3. Qualitative Research

Qualitative research methodologies are oriented towards developing understanding

of the meaning and experience dimensions of human lives and their social worlds

(Fossey et al, 2002).

Qualitative research is chosen as the tool for research in order to explore the chosen

topic of the study. In the words of Denzin and Lincoln (1994) Qualitative research is

multi-method in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic approach to its subject

matter. This conveys that qualitative researchers study things in their natural settings,

attempting to make sense of or interpret phenomena in terms of the meanings that

people bring to them. Qualitative research involves the studied use and collection of a

variety of empirical materials; case study, personal experience, introspective, life

story interview, observational, historical, interactional, and visual texts that describe

routine and problematic moments and meaning in individuals' lives. “A qualitative

study is defined as an inquiry process of understanding a social or human problem,

based on building a complex, holistic picture, formed with words, reporting detailed

views of informants, and conducted in a natural setting” (Cresswell, 1994).


43

Denzin and Lincoln (1994) assert that qualitative research tool is “the art of asking

questions and listening”. Qualitative research is unstructured, exploratory in nature,

based on small samples, and may utilize popular qualitative techniques such as focus

groups (group interviews), word association (asking respondents to indicate their first

responses to stimulus words), and in-depth interviews (one-on-one interviews that

probe the respondents’ thoughts in detail) (Malhotra, 2005). Qualitative research

interviews vary in methodological features such as length, style of questioning, and

participant numbers (group or individual), while most of them are carried out face-to-

face, and can also be carried out by telephone, or via the internet (Cassell and Symon,

2004). This study uses the mode of telephonic interviews as a qualitative research

tool.

4.4. Why Qualitative Research?

The reason for choosing qualitative research tool instead of quantitative research tool

can be justified in the words of Van Mannen (1991) as he asserted that “Unlike

quantitative data, raw qualitative data cannot be analysed statistically and hence

qualitative research is always concerned with questions that begin with, why? How?

In what way? Etc... Qualitative research is preferred because it is very difficult to

explain human behaviour in simply measurable terms like quantitative research

method. Measurements essentially tell us how many people behave in a certain way

but they do not adequately answer the question ‘why’? (Denzin and Lincoln, 1994).

Since the study focuses around consumers’ beliefs, opinions, and views, qualitative

approach is adopted. This can be inferred from the words of Silverman (1999) that

qualitative approach is favoured as it helps the researcher to gain insight into people’s


44

motivation, emotions and behaviours. Holliday (2002) asserts that qualitative research

is interpretative. Qualitative research carries deep insights into behaviour of people

within specific social setting rather than a broad population. According to baker

(1991), qualitative research is appropriate particularly to ‘elicit attitudinal and

motivational factors which influence behaviour’ and ‘to understand why people

behave the way they do’. Kaplan (1964) suggested that there is only one thing that

distinguishes human from natural world; it is our ability to talk, interact. This

‘interactive nature’ of qualitative research makes it possible to measure the reactions

of a great many people to a limited set of questions thus facilitating comparison and

statistical aggregation of data.

The qualitative research adopted in this study is flexible in nature. As said by Patton

(2000), In-depth interviews are flexible as it does not follow the rigid method to carry

out the interview. Semi-structured interviews are more suitable when the research area

is sensitive and requires the respondents to talk more personally of their experiences.

4.5. Interviews

In-depth interviews were carried out as a qualitative research tool for pursuing the

study. An interview has been defined as ‘a conversation directed to a definite purpose

other than satisfaction in the conversation itself’ (Chisnall, 1997). According to

Drever (1995), interviewing people is one of the commonest methods used in small-

scale educational research work. An interview is a purposeful conversation “used to

gather descriptive data in the subjects own words so that the researcher can develop

insights on how subjects interpret some piece of the world” (Bogdan & Biklen, 1998).


45

In-depth interviews were carried out for the study in order to uncover the beliefs,

attitudes, feelings and emotions of the respondents. In the words of (Cooper and

Schindler, 1999), in-depth interview encourages respondents to share as much

information as possible in an unconstrained environment.

Interview styles differ in structure. According to Seidman’s (1998) in-depth

interviewing utilizes open-ended questions that build upon and direct the probing of

participants’ responses and the goal of in-depth interviewing is “to have participants

reconstruct his or her experience within the topic under study”.

In the words of Drever (1995) semi-structured interviews are ‘that the interviewer sets

up a general structure by deciding in advance what ground is to be covered and what

questions are to be asked. This leaves the detailed structure to be worked out during

the interview. The person interviewed can answer at some length in his or her own

words, and the interviewer responds using prompts, probes, and follow-up questions

to get the interviewee to clarify or expand on the answers’.

One of the most significant techniques in good interviewing is the use of probes.

Probes were used in the study, during the interviews to obtain detailed substantiated

answers. The technique of stimulating respondents to answer more fully and

relevantly is termed probing (Cooper and Schindler, 1999). Patton (1990) identifies

three types of probes: detail-oriented probes, elaboration probes, and clarification

probes. This study uses the elaboration probes and according to Patton (1990)

elaboration probes is designed to encourage the interviewee to tell the researcher

more. Furthermore the researcher indicates his/her desire to know more by such


46

things as gently nodding his/her head as the respondent talks, softly voicing 'un-huh'

every so often, and sometimes by just remaining silent but attentive. The interview

used few questions such as ‘Could you tell me more about this?’, ‘Why do you think

so?’, ‘What else can you think about it?’, ‘What is the reason for your reason?’ etc…

4.6. Sampling

Qualitative researchers work with small samples of people, bound by specific

contexts, and studied in depth (Miles and Huberman, 1994). Nonprobability sampling

which is non-random and subjective (Cooper and Schindler, 1999) is applied in the

study to carry out the interviews. Nonprobability sampling allows interviewers to

choose sample members ‘at random’ (meaning ‘as they wish’ or ‘wherever they find

them’) which is not random sampling. Judgement sampling, a kind of nonprobability

sampling, was used in order to select the interviewees. Judgement sampling occurs

when a researcher selects sample members to conform to some criterion (Cooper and

Schindler, 1999). With the application of Judgement sampling, people who possess a

car in India were alone picked up as per the researcher’s choice from the general

public for the study. Thus the sampling frame for this study was the public in general

who own a car brand in India. As asserted by Malhotra (2005) “Qualitative research is

unstructured, exploratory in nature, based on small samples…”, the sample size for

this study is 10.

4.7. Telephone interview

Cooper and Schindler (1999) assert that telephone makes its greatest contribution in

survey work as a unique mode of communication to collect information from

respondents. Also that telephone can be helpful in arranging personal interviews and


47

screening large populations for unusual types of respondents. Despite telephonic

interviews being expensive than other modes of interviews, they helped the researcher

to converse with the respondents who are far beyond the reach. Telephonic interviews

are also less time consuming when the interviews are well scheduled through emails

before the interview is carried out.

The study consisted of 10 adult customers in the age group of 30-60 years old. All the

ten respondents were interviewed through telephone. The respondents were already

informed of the interviews and were scheduled through emails according to their

convenience. This helped the researcher to avoid lapse of time that results from

making repeated calls in order to check the availability of respondents. The

respondents were well informed of the purpose of the interview before the start of

each and every interview. Furthermore, the respondents were explained the subject

oriented terms such as ‘COO’, ‘COBO’, ‘globalness of the brand’, etc… The reason

for explaining these terms were to make the respondents feel more comfortable with

the topic to be interviewed. Each interview lasted for about 30-40 minutes.

The interviews were started with questions that were easy to answer such as ‘what

brand is you car?’, which made the respondents to feel free by answering the

questions. The respondents were then gradually asked questions that took a little time

for the respondents to answer such as ‘How do you perceive global brands (such as

Ford, BMW, Mercedes, Toyota, etc...)?’, ‘If in case the price of the local brand was

cheaper than the global brand, which brand would you choose? Why’, etc…The

interviews were thus started with easy questions and once the conversations got


48

smoother and friendly, it was then moved to questions where the respondents took

time to answer.

The main purpose of the interview was to understand consumer perception of global

brands vs. local brands of cars in India. The questions were framed in such a way that

the objectives of the study were addressed accordingly. For example, questions such

as ‘Do you know the brand origin of your car?’, ‘What makes you attached to the

country (of the brand origin)?’, ‘Do you think that Country of Origin of your brand

has a direct influence in your purchase?’ etc…facilitated the researcher to examine the

effects of country of origin on consumer perceptions of global and local car brands.

Furthermore questions such as ‘How do you perceive local brands (such as Tata,

Maruti etc...)?’, ‘How do you perceive global brands (such as Ford, BMW, Mercedes,

Toyota, etc...)?’, ‘What factors (such as quality, value, esteem, status, globalness per

se) influenced you to buy this brand?’ etc… facilitated the researcher to highlight the

factors that effect consumer preference for global car brands and also to understand

consumer perceptions of global vs. local car brands.

A pilot interview was conducted before interviewing the actual recruited respondents.

The purpose of the pilot interview was to test the framed questions for flaws. The

pilot interview helped the researcher to a great extent wherein a major error was

rectified. The initial idea of the study was to understand customers’ perception of

global vs. local car brands in UK. Thus the pilot study was conducted with a

respondent in UK. During the pilot interview, it was discovered by the researcher that

the UK car industry was very rich only in its global brands and hardly had any local

brands. Thus, in order to create a balance in the study and also to create a more


49

meaningful insight, the researcher had to pursue the same study in the Indian car

industry, which has a good mixture of global and local car brands.

4.8. Summary

The chapter has explained and substantiated the methods used for conducting the

study. With the application of qualitative research, the researcher was able to explain

things in a more descriptive manner. In order to create a deep understanding of

consumers’ insights of global brands against local brands, qualitative approach was

adopted with an in-depth and semi-structured interview process. Interviews as a

qualitative tool helped the researcher to uncover individual’s covert feelings and

emotions towards the perception of global and local car brands. Telephonic interviews

were adopted in order to reach the far-off customers. Although telephonic interviews

seem to be a little expensive, it was tremendously helpful when the interviews were

well scheduled through emails before the interview was carried out, thereby

consuming less time. The use of pilot study before the actual interviews, were of

enormous help to the researcher.

The next chapter will prolong the study to analysis and findings of the gathered data.

The data gathered through interviews are analysed and findings are divulged in the

chapter with the espousal of the literature review.


50

Chapter Five

5. Analysis and Findings

5.1. Introduction

This chapter discusses and critically analyses the findings of the qualitative data by

tentatively examining the interviewees’ responses and beliefs. The gathered

qualitative data are analysed accordingly to accomplish the objectives of the study.

This was done by meticulously comparing the most relevant distinct responses by the

interviewees. These distinct responses were also critically analysed with the support

of the past literature and also the researchers’ own personal view and experience

during the interviews. Thus the unique personal quotes of the respondents remained as

the rationale for the analysis of the study.

This chapter begins with the background information of the respondents who possess

a car in India. The study is then pursued to analysis and discussion of the findings

from the interviews made, wherein the responses are analysed and discussed with

regard to the research objectives of the study.

5.2. Background of the respondents

The researcher interviewed 10 respondents in the age group of 30-60 who owned a car

in India.


51

Table 1 – A background of the respondents

Name of the Respondent Age Global / Local car

brand

Name of the car

brand

Mr. Arun 32 Local Brand Maruti Zen

Mr. Sathish 35 Global brand Ford Ikon

Mr. Sudharson 42 Local Brand Tata Indica

Mr. Napoleon 51 Local Brand Tata Safari

Mr. Arumugasamy 60 Global Brand Hyundai Santro

Mr.Chakravarthi

Thavamani

56 Local Brand Maruti Zen

Mr. Surendhran 33 Global Brand Skoda Octavia

Mr. Rajendhran 59 Global Brand Mercedes Benz

Mr. Ashok 49 Global Brand Hyundai Accent

Mr. Lambodharan 38 Global Brand Honda City

Among the 10 respondents interviewed, 4 individuals possessed a local brand and 6

individuals possessed a global brand. Most of the respondents who were interviewed

had a good knowledge about the cars in general, so it was expedient for the researcher

to obtain pragmatic and valuable answers in order to pursue the study.

5.3. Analysis and Discussion of the interviews

Qualitative analysis is a process of reviewing, synthesizing and interpreting data to

describe and explain the phenomena or social worlds being studied (Fossey et al,

2002). Thus the analysis part of this study provides insights into the understanding of


52

the beliefs and attitudes of the respondents and the perceptions they hold towards the

global and local car brands. Fossey et al (2002) assert that developing an

understanding of qualitative data requires conceptual level processes of exploring the

meanings, patterns or connections among data that involve the researcher’s own

thought, reflection and intuition.

The interview questions were framed in such a way that the respondents’ answers

could be interpreted meticulously in order to accomplish the desired objectives of the

study. The responses are analysed and discussed with regard to the research objectives

of the study. To begin with the analysis, the secondary objectives of the study are first

accomplished in order to achieve the key objective of the study.

5.4. Accomplishing objectives of the study

5.4.1. Objective one: Highlighting the factors that effect consumer preference for

global brands

Emphasizing the factors that effect consumer preference for global car brands assisted

the researcher to relate these factors to understand consumer perception of global vs.

local car brands. Under this category of discussion, it was convenient for the

researcher to analyze the responses from the individuals who possessed a global car

brand.

A respondent who had a Ford Ikon could immediately think of; “Its reputation as a

brand that has a world wide presence and its quality….I said reputation because;

many people all over the world fancy the brand….As a worldwide brand, Ford stands

for its quality.” And he bought the brand as he asserted that; “I would first tell its


53

word wide presence….ya its globalness as you said…then comes status and

quality…Ford brand is really good. All these factors add value to the car and

eventually made me to buy this brand.”- Sathish, 35.

As Steenkamp (2003) had asserted that Consumers become perceptive to global

brands when consumers believe the brand is marketed in multiple countries and is

recognized as global in these countries, the brand, Ford Ikon having a worldwide

presence has influenced the respondent to possess it. Also the respondent is

influenced by the brands’ world wide reputation and its quality and status of

possessing the brand.

Similarly, the factors that influenced a respondent to buy a Mercedes Benz asserted

that “worldwide presence was the foremost factor….this made me to trust the brand

and made me safe in possessing the brand…the quality of cars of the brand,

‘Mercedes Benz’ was also one of the reasons…and also its powerful engines and its

well-built cars make me admire the brand….and lastly, ‘esteem’ in possessing the

car…” and when he thinks of the brand he says, ‘Its poshness and its luxury…are the

ones that I think about the car brand….another important feature of the brand is its

comfortableness…But generally, “Mercedes” often conveys “poshness”….and also

its worldwide presence” – Rajendhran, 59.

Skoda Octavia was possessed by a respondent as he justified it as “I would just tell

esteem and globalness, which made me buy the brand... also because of the foreign

make and international presence that would boost up the reason…Skoda is good in

quality as well….but ‘esteem’ in possessing the car and ‘foreignness’ of the brand


54

were the major influencers that backed up my purchase…”and when the respondent

thinks of Skoda, he talks of “Its elegance…..and comfortness are the initial ones that

come to my mind immediately… Skoda cars also stand for their powerful engines and

luxury interiors….” – Surendhran, 33.

Apart from the respondents’ preference of the brand being present worldwide, they

also added factors such as trust, luxury, comfortness, esteem, quality of cars made by

the brand. One respondent (Rajendhran, 59) mentioned that he felt safe of possessing

Mercedes Benz as the brand is trusted worldwide. Another respondent who owns a

Skoda, revealed the ‘foreignness’ and esteem in possessing the brand (Surendhran,

33). The technological superiority of the global brand makes the respondents to

admire the brand. The technological superiority of the brand here is referred to the

powerful engines and the luxury interiors mentioned by the respondents. Mercedes,

being a global brand conveys poshness and worldwide presence to the respondents.

This anecdotes from the words of Batra et al (2000), who asserted that international

and global brands have been associated with prestige or status, in addition to quality.

Besides this, there are research works that have documented the importance of

country-of-origin (COO) image in consumer evaluation of foreign products and

brands and also favorable country perceptions are known to lead to favorable

perceptions of associated attributes such as product quality indicating thereby, that

consumer evaluations are governed by influences other than the quality of the product

(Peterson and Jolibert, 1995).


55

This can be inferred from a respondent who could immediately think about Hyundai

Santro as; “It is a Korean make….a brand from Korea that has world wide reputation

and has got good fame….. The brand that is well known for its technical expertise…”

and the factors that he associated with the brand were as he asserted; “Factors such as

quality and good reputation have influenced me to buy this brand….It is also the

brand name, ‘Hyundai’ that influenced my purchase…because it is a very good

make….” – Arumugasamy, 60

Likewise in the words of another respondent, “Quality and globalness of the brand

has a major influence for my purchase. Good reputation also has its part, as it has a

large presence all over the world….people around the world can recognize the brand

name…due to the Korean make and the quality in it…” and also “comfortness would

be the first thing that comes to my mind….I just can imagine the comfortness of the

car while I drive and also the pleasure by driving it…the brand conveys quality and

comfortness…” – Ashok, 49.

Thus the respondents were influenced by the Korean make. As the brand has its origin

from Korea, it made the respondents trust the brand due to its quality and reputation.

The quality of being a Korean make has influenced the respondents’ purchase. The

respondents have associated the brand name, ‘Hyundai’ to quality, worldwide

presence, fame and technical expertise.

“I was first influenced by its foreign make…..and then the brand being from Japan,

made me to trust its quality…It is trusted and preferred by a large number of people

in India itself….People who possessed the brand were satisfied with the brand and


56

this increased my trust….ya…globalness can also be one of the reasons….as it has

presence and being trusted all over the world ”…and when the respondent thinks of

Honda, he could think of “Its quality and sturdiness….By sturdiness, I mean its

ruggedness on the roads due to its quality make… I can also think of the reputation of

the brand ‘Honda’….and nothing else other than this…a very strong brand in

India...” – Lambodharan, 38.

Here, the respondent conversed about the foreign make. And also the brand being

Japanese make, has made him trust the brand due to its quality, globalness and

reputation of the brand. This can be inferred from Batra et al., (2000) and Leclerc and

Schmitt (1994) that Consumers perceive foreign brand that it might have superior

quality because of its developed nation origin is certainly likely.

Therefore, the respondents who possessed global brands preferred them due to its

global presence, worldwide reputation, quality of being a foreign make. Good quality

and reputation of being a global brand were the major influencers for their preferences

of global brands. It was also found during the interview that the respondents

mentioned the terms ‘foreign make’, ‘foreignness’, ‘foreign car’, etc…and their liking

towards it during the conversations. This indicated their interest in possessing foreign

made products. It was also inferred from the respondents’ conversations that they

trusted foreign made cars that had worldwide presence. They also tried associating the

brands to the country from where it took its origin from and also attaching values such

as technological expertise, superior quality, etc... Thus, it was found that one of the

significant reasons for customer preference for global brands was considered to be the


57

country-of- origin effects, which will be discussed in detail in the next part of this

chapter.

5.4.2. Objective two: Examining the effects of country-of-origin on consumer

perceptions of global brands and local brands

COO has been defined as the country where the corporate headquarters of the

company marketing the product or brand is situated (Johansson, J.K. et al, 1985).

Country-of-origin plays a vital role in the formation of consumer perceptions towards

global and local brands, as Kinra (2006) asserts that COO is considered as an

important differentiating factor in consumer attitudes to foreign and local brand

names. Examining the effects of country-of-origin will assist the researcher to study

its influence on consumer perceptions towards global brands and local brands.

It was surprising to note that every respondent who were interviewed, were aware of

the brand origins of their cars. Thus it was convenient for the researcher to probe the

interviewees in-depth and gain valuable insights of their beliefs and perceptions

towards their brands. The questions such as ‘Do you know the brand origin of your

car?’, ‘what makes you attached to the country (of the brand origin)?’, and ‘Do you

think that Country of Origin of your brand has a direct influence in your purchase?’

assisted the researcher to examine the effects of country-of-origin on consumer

perceptions of global brands and local brands.

A respondent who possesses a Maruti, which is a local brand, converses the reason for

being attached to the country of origin that “I trust because it is made in India….It is

from India!! Although it is purely because of trust….some times I get the feel of our


58

own Nationality. And moreover, India is getting rich and stronger in its automobile

sector and I also trust the cars made in our country….India manufactures and sell

quality cars and are also technically efficient. So I can easily relate car brands from

India to quality and technically efficient ones.”- Arun, 32

The respondent evaluated the local brand in a favorable manner, wherein he

associated the brand to India’s strong automobile sector that makes quality and

technically efficient cars. He also mentioned the feel of nationality towards the

country by possessing a local brand. This shows his positive attitude towards the

country of manufacture, although there are numerous global brands on Indian roads.

A respondent who possesses a Hyundai Santro, a global brand said that “I feel that

Korean products in general are good for it quality technical expertise…they are very

tough and sturdy….Korea is always famous for its technical products and

equipments….. They are technically good, durable and best in quality…”–

Arumugasamy, 60

Similarly, another respondent who possessed a Hyundai Accent asserted that “the

place of origin of my brand has a direct influence with my purchase...largely because

it is a Korean brand. Before I bought my car, I felt that a Korean car would be highly

good in quality and technically advanced in its make…and this made me attached to

my purchase…”- Ashok, 49

Both the respondents here related ‘Hyundai’ as a brand from Korea and they believed

that Korean made products are known for their best quality and technical expertise.


59

Moreover, it was found that the country-of-origin of Hyundai had a direct influence in

the respondents’ purchase. Thus the Korean car makes are related by the respondents

to best quality, durability, and technical advancements and these makes the

respondents attached to Korea. These backs up the words of Harris et al. (1994) who

suggested that brand origin associations play a potentially powerful role in the

formation of brand attitudes.

This can again be illustrated wherein a respondent who owns a global brand, Honda

said that “Only because the brand was a Japanese make, I bought the brand…Japan’s

advanced engineering works and technological advancements in making cars had a

direct influence in my purchase…” and also that “Japan is known for its technological

advancements and advanced engineering manufactures. Japan is especially best for

making very very high quality cars…” - Lambodharan, 38. Thus the respondent was

influenced by the Japanese make due to the country’s advanced engineering works

and technological advancements. Also when the respondent was asked if he was

directly influenced by the country-of-origin of Honda, it was found that Japan had a

direct influence in the respondent’s purchase.

Likewise, it was found from a respondent who owns a Mercedes Benz that he was

influenced by the German and American make of cars due to its technical

advancements, powerful in nature, modernization and also trust. He also stressed the

word ‘make’ which was an important deciding factor for him to decide between

brands. A brief of his words were “Of course, the ‘make’ that is the place of origin

matters a lot to me and also has a direct influence in my purchase…Only because

Mercedes Benz was a German and an American make…it made me trust the brand


60

and led to my purchase…just because German and American cars are strong and

powerful in nature and technically advanced…..German made vehicles are especially

good for its modernization of cars….Both the countries are ahead in their technical

advancements…and this makes me attached to the countries...”- Rajendhran, 59

A respondent who owns a Skoda, which is based from Czech Republic responded that

“I just know that it is a European make….It is known for its well built cars with

powerful engines….Europe is generally superior in manufacturing cars that are

robust…”. Although the brand was from Czech Republic, the respondent generalized

his statement by saying that the brand was from Europe. He also said that “Yes I do

feel that country of origin of the brand has a direct influence in my purchase, just

because I felt that the European cars are best for their powerful engines, for its

ruggedness and quality…I just relate European countries with its richness in making

cars…..”- Surendhran, 33. The respondent associated the brand ‘Skoda’ to Europe

which is rich in making cars that are best known for their powerful engines,

ruggedness and quality.

Despite the presence of respondents who felt that the country of their brand origin had

a direct influence in their purchase, there were also few respondents who felt that their

brand origin had an indirect influence in their purchase. This can be perceived when a

respondent who possessed a local brand, was asked if his purchase of the local brand

was directly influenced by the country-of-origin, as he asserted that “No, I don’t think

that the origin of the brand has a direct influence in buying. The first thing I

considered was the brand name, ‘Tata’ because of its good reputation….place of

origin of the brand would have had an indirectly influence in my purchase because


61

‘Tata’, a well reputed brand from India……”- Sudharson, 42. Thus the respondent

was not influenced by the country-of-origin, but merely trusted the brand name itself.

Similarly, a respondent who possesses a ‘Ford’ said that “I do know the country from

which the brand came into. But I don’t tend to relate it to the country…I just see it as

a global brand. So, there is nothing that I feel attached to the country.” “I don’t feel

that it is American and I didn’t buy because its origin is America. But when I think of

Ford…it is just the foreign make” - Sathish, 35. In this context, the respondent was

not influenced by the country-of-origin, but was just influenced by the brand as being

a foreign make.

All the consumers who were interviewed were aware of their car’s brand origin and

this made the study even more interesting. It was found that 7 out of 10 consumers

being interviewed were directly influenced by the country-of-origin of their brand to

purchase. It was also found that the respondents made favorable perceptions of the

country, wherein they tend to associate factors such as superior quality, technical

advancements, modernization, etc…to the country from which the brand had taken its

origin. There were also respondents who were attached to the country-of-origin due to

these factors. Despite this, there were also very few respondents who weren’t directly

influenced by the country of brand origin. These respondents were merely influenced

by the brand just as a ‘foreign make’ or as a trust towards the brand name that made

them purchase the brand.

It is considerable to note that Country-of-origin of the brand has a substantial effect

on consumers’ perception of global and local car brands. The respondents who owned


62

a local brand evaluated the local brand in a favorable manner, wherein they tend to

associate the brand to India’s strong automobile sector that makes quality and

technically efficient cars. Moreover, these respondents also had a sense of nationality

and trusted the local brands and felt safe in possessing them. Besides this, most of the

respondents who owned a global car brand had a positive perception towards the

country-of-origin, thereby appealing the brand by associating with its origin. It was

also found that these respondents had a fascination towards their brands as a ‘foreign

make’.

Although country-of-origin has a substantial effect on consumer perception of global

and local car brands, it is significant to discuss the effects of consumer ethnocentrism

towards global brands. This is discussed in objective three.

5.4.3. Objective three: To study the effects of consumer ethnocentrism over global

brands

Consumer ethnocentrism is a psychological construct representing how consumers

view products made in their own country markets as objects of pride and identity

versus those from other country markets (Kinra, 2006). It is also stated by Reardon et

al (2005) that ethnocentricity has substantial implications for consumer attitude

formation towards foreign products/brands, their purchase intentions and choice

between domestic versus foreign-made products. Thus studying the effects of

consumer ethnocentrism over global brands helped the researcher to better understand

the respondents’ beliefs and perceptions towards global and local car brands. The

effects of consumer ethnocentrism over global brands can be well comprehended by

summarizing and discussing the responses from the interviewees.


63

A respondent who owned Maruti, a local brand said that “Maruti being an Indian

brand…makes me to trust my country owned brand. India manufactures and sells

quality cars and is also technically efficient. So I can easily relate car brands from

India to quality and technically efficient ones” (Arun, 32). He also said that “I feel

local brands in India can be trusted although there is a presence of numerous global

brands on the roads. Local brands are equally good in quality. Local brands are to be

trusted” (Arun, 32). This shows the respondents’ positive attitude and liking towards

the local brand amongst the global car brands.

Simultaneously, the same respondent perceives global brands as “Global

brands….well I don’t fancy global brands much….but I have seen people fancy global

brands due its ‘globalness’ itself…And being in India, I feel that local brands compete

equally with global brands in all means…..I mean the quality and technical

aspects….I don’t mean that I neglect global brands…but just feel safe with local

brands…..”(Arun, 32). This shows his sense of feeling towards local brands in India.

Likewise a respondent who owns a local car brand had a positive thought and felt

content of possessing the brand as he said that “I am already using a Maruti 800 car

for the past five years. I am happy with the performance, low maintenance cost, a

dependable car and last but not the least, good resale value.” And also uttered that

“Good and longest reputation in the Indian market.”- Chakravarthi Thavamani, 56.

Alternatively a respondent who had a positive thought of local brands, also felt that

global brands are still better than the local car brands. This can be revealed when a

respondent who owns a Tata, a local brand said that “It is a good brand and Tata is a


64

well known brand in the whole of India….I trust the brand…because it is efficient in

quality…” (Napoleon, 51). Despite this, he also mentioned that “Global brands are

actually better than local brands in quality….these brands are known for its luxury

and are posh on Indian roads...but most of these brands don’t have presence all over

the country….they are just present in the metropolitan cities…..they are also

expensive than local brands…” - Napoleon, 51.

Similarly a respondent, who had a positive thought of local brands, chose a global

brand when he was given a choice to decide between local and global car brands. This

was evidenced when a respondent uttered that “Local brands are fine in quality. They

are less expensive and have good value for money….Indian brands are not bad….they

are good in all means…also operate technically well” - Sudharson, 42.

But when the respondent was given a choice between local and global car brands, and

was also given a situation where the local brand was expensive than the global car

brand, he responded as “I would go for the global brand…as it is going to be less

expensive than the local one…although I have said to you that quality is important for

me in choosing a car brand, global brands would surely be good in quality as they

serve worldwide people…if the global brands are going to be less expensive, then they

are going to give good value too..…so would choose the global brand”- Sudharson,

42.

Although local car brands are well established in India owing to the rapid growth of

the automobile sector, most of the respondents perceived global brands to be better off


65

than local brands. This can be exemplified when the respondents uttered in a unique

manner.

“Although local brands are good in both quality and trust, global brands are still

better than that…”- Arumugasamy, 60.

Likewise a respondent perceived local brands as ‘They are good brands….” (In what

way is it good?) “Good in quality and less expensive than foreign brands….but I feel

that with the presence of large global brands, local brands seldom stand out of the

crowd…….” – Sathish, 35.

Similarly another respondent utters that “Local brands are not bad in India….as India

is getting well established in its automobile sector, the Indian brands are reaching

beyond boundaries…they provide good value for money….and good in quality too but

technologically, they are not as advanced as the global brands do…”- Ashok, 49.

Furthermore a respondent said that “Global car brands are the best to me…their

foreign make would speak its quality…And I feel that foreign brands are majestic on

Indian roads…they stand out among the local brands….” - Lambodharan, 38

Although all the respondents who were interviewed had a positive perception towards

local brands in India, most of the respondents felt that global car brands were better

than Indian brands. Even the respondents, who owned a local brand, had a positive

insight towards global brands. The respondents who own a local brand had a feel of

contentment, being safe with the home brand and also trust towards the brand.


66

Furthermore, they also felt that global car brands were expensive than the local

brands.

Vida and Fairhurst (1999) have asserted that ‘Consumer ethnocentric attitudes can be

rated on a continuum from highly ethnocentric to non-ethnocentric, whereby a

consumer at the high end of the spectrum believes that purchasing foreign-made

products is morally wrong. In contrast, highly non ethnocentric consumers may judge

foreign products based on their attributes and/or view them as better because they are

not produced in their own country. Consumers who are low on CET are more

cosmopolitan in outlook and have a higher degree of cultural openness.’ This specific

study resulted with the consumers who were non ethnocentric wherein they judged

foreign products based on their attributes and/or viewed them as better because they

were not produced in their own country. Furthermore, there were also consumers who

were low on CET and were found to be more cosmopolitan in outlook along with a

high degree of cultural openness.

5.4.4. Key Objective: To understand consumer perception of Global brands vs.

local brands

Consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands can be better understood by

summarizing and discussing the pertinent responses from the interviewees. Apart

from comprehending the responses, the findings of the secondary objectives that have

already been discussed backs up in accomplishing the primary objective of the study.

A respondent who owns a local brand conferred about it as “Maruti cars are generally

good…good in quality…in fact provides good value for money. Gives full


67

satisfaction!! A satisfaction derived from making a right choice among other cars…It

is a friendly car for my family…Its size (small) also matters…..it is user friendly…I

usually don’t go for the big size vehicles like Ford, Opel, and others…Maruti is

always good!!” And also when given choice of global and local brand and was told a

situation wherein the local brand was expensive than the global brand, the respondent

responded that “….if the local brands are slightly expensive than global brands, then I

would definitely buy only the local brand….just because of trust…” (Arun, 32). This

exhibits that local brands provide satisfaction and good value for money to the

respondent. Furthermore, trust plays a significant role in his choice of local brand.

Similarly, another respondent favors a local brand merely because of trust and quality.

“I would choose the local brand….in my view; local brands are good in India’ ‘The

main reason for choosing it is because of its quality and the trust I have on Indian

brands…..today, India is performing well in automobile sector and the local brands

have country wide presence and this makes me easily trust the local brands in

India…the cars are also technically good and lasts longer….very durable….they are

worth buying and are reasonable in price.”(Napoleon, 51). He also emphasizes that

“….I will not think of prestige or status in choosing a car brand….just to add one

more point to the answer, I would tell that local brands in India are also

prestigious…..the new models being introduced by Indian companies itself shows

this…they are good in luxury and convey status and prestige…Although, prestige and

status are not important to me…”- Napoleon, 51. This shows that the respondent feels

that the local brands are equally good in prestige and also that prestige or status is not

an important factor to him.


68

Likewise, in the words of another respondent who owns a Maruti, a local brand, “I

would always vote for quality and trust. Never will I be mislead by prestige .I think

cars add only to false prestige. I think it is better to relay on ones good and long

reputation than imaginary false prestige.”- Chakravarthi Thavamani, 56.

On the other side, a respondent who owns a local brand perceives the global car

brands in a positive approach. As he utters that “Global brands are too good….The

quality is better than the local brands in terms of technical aspects and the

design...they are seen as luxury vehicles by most of them in my family….and also

dream cars that are of foreign make….these brands are excellent in quality…mainly

because they are global…”- Sudharson, 42.

A respondent who owns a global brand, converses about the local brand that “They

are good brands….Good in quality and less expensive than foreign brands….but I feel

that with the presence of large global brands, local brands seldom stand out of the

crowd…….”. But when the respondent was given a choice of a global and local brands

to buy a second car, in no moment he said that “I will choose the global brand.....as I

have already said that I really admire and also they are appealing than local

brands….I wouldn’t mind to spend extra cost for buying a global brand….even if they

are going to be really higher than the local brands…because they would give me the

extra benefits for which I am going to spend….the extra benefits are the quality,

worthiness, attractive….”- Sathish, 35.


69

Thus it can be derived that global car brands appeal more than local car brands to the

respondent and also that global car brands could be consumed in order to gain extra

benefits such as quality, worthiness and attractiveness.

A respondent who owns a global car brand confers that “Global brands convey its

presence everywhere in the world…people all over the world can recognize the brand

name…foreign makes that have worldwide presence are best in quality but expensive

to afford it……it is luxurious to possess a global brand in a country like India…”

“Although local brands are good in both, global brands are still better than that….” -

Arumugasamy, 60. This serves as an anecdote to the words of Shocker et al., (1994)

as it was said that ‘Research shows that perceived brand globalness for global brands

could create consumer perceptions of brand superiority’. The respondent also

associates best quality to his global car brand.

Not only did the respondents associate global brands with best quality, but also they

tend to associate it with trust. This was evidenced when a respondent said that

“Global car brands are always better for me….not only they would be good in

prestige, but also good in quality and trust…..although I don’t believe in prestige, I

perceive global brands to be well-off in quality and trust...” - Lambodharan, 38.

This can be still substantiated wherein a respondent who owns a global brand uttered

that “I will not mind to pay the additional value in order to get the global brand

unless I get financially weak… just for the simple reason because global car brands

are the best in quality and can be widely trusted… They are very much

technologically advanced in manufacturing cars…” (Ashok, 49). This shows that the


70

global brands are not only good in quality and trust but are technologically advanced

too. These words also serve as an anecdote to Kapferer (1997) who said that ‘if a

brand is viewable as globally available, consumers may attribute higher quality to the

brand because such quality is likely to be thought of as critical to global acceptance.’

Although the global car brands are more expensive than the local brands, most of the

respondents who were interviewed felt that it was worth buying global brands due its

superior quality, technological advancements and reputation as being global.

Furthermore, this can be again evidenced when a respondent uttered that “I feel that

foreign brands are majestic on Indian roads…they stand out among the local

brands….”; “Even an expensive global car brand is worth buying because of its value

and long lasting durability. They are reliable in quality and admirable in design and

make…Especially Honda gives me stress-free drives….and extremely well in its

quality make….”- Lambodharan, 38

A respondent perceives global brands as “Global brands are fabulous…Skoda, BMW,

Mercedes, etc…are excellent in their quality and are very much technically

advanced….foreign branded cars are inspiring in their models and designs…and very

very sturdy on Indian roads….” . Furthermore, when the respondent was given a

choice of a global and a local car brand to purchase a second car, the respondent said

that “A ‘global brand’, because of its foreignness and worldwide reputation… I would

choose a local brand in India, but with the presence of a global brand, I will choose

the global brand for sure….as local brands are also good in India, but not as good as

the global ones in quality, technical expertise and designs” “I will 100% buy a global


71

brand…probably Toyota, which is a well reputed Japanese brand…” - Surendhran,

33.

Similarly, another respondent responded that “I would of course choose the global

brand….and probably my dream car ‘Ferrari’, which is really expensive to

possess….Driving a Ferrari, would make me feel in heaven….it is such a good

car….” The respondent also substantiated this by describing that “global brands are

always better than local brands in India…Global brands are luxurious and

prestigious too…Although they are expensive, they are worth buying….the global

brands can be highly trusted due to its large presence…I just fancy brands like

Mercedes, Opel, and Ferrari…due to its foreign make and popularity as a global

brand…”- Rajendhran, 59.

Therefore it could be elucidated that the respondents perceive local brands to be good

in India, but not as good as the global ones in quality, technical expertise and designs.

They also found global car brands to be luxurious in nature.

Local brands were found to provide satisfaction and good value for money. The

respondents, who possessed local brands, trusted the brands and felt safe with it. This

can also be understood from Schuiling et al (2004), who asserted that “value is linked

with the fact that prices of local brands are usually lower than those of international

brands, providing consumers a sense of better value for the money”. Quality and trust

were the major influencers for possessing local brands. Prestige or status had only a

passive role in the respondents’ perception, who owned a local car brand. As an


72

ethnocentric effect, it was revealed by a respondent that local car brands in India were

also equally good in prestige.

Although it has been suggested by Kapferer (1997) that consumers may prefer foreign

brands because of associations of higher prestige, it was surprising to note that very

few respondents believed in status or prestige as a factor that effected in their

perception towards local and global brands. It was only 3 out of 10 respondents who

were interviewed, believed in status or prestige of possessing a global car brand. It

was also derived that global car brands appeal more than local car brands to the

respondents and also that global car brands could be consumed in order to gain extra

benefits such as quality, worthiness and attractiveness. Although the global car brands

are more expensive than the local brands, most of the respondents who were

interviewed felt that it was worth buying global brands due its superior quality,

technological advancements and reputation as being global. Apart from these, Global

car brands were often associated by the respondents to ‘luxury’, ‘comfortness’ and as

a ‘foreign make’.

Last but not the least, it was revealed that most of the respondents perceive local

brands to be good in India, but not as good as the global ones in quality, technical

expertise and designs.

5.5. Review of key Findings and Conclusion

This chapter assisted the researcher to critically analyse the findings of the qualitative

data by tentatively examining the interviewees’ responses and beliefs. The gathered

qualitative data were analysed accordingly to accomplish the objectives of the study.


73

This was done by meticulously comparing the most relevant distinct responses by the

interviewees. Among the 10 respondents interviewed, 4 individuals possessed a local

brand and 6 individuals possessed a global brand. Most of the respondents who were

interviewed had a good knowledge about the cars in general. The secondary

objectives of the study were first accomplished in order to achieve the key objective

of the study.

Highlighting the factors that effect consumer preference for global car brands assisted


local car brands. By accomplishing this objective, it was found that the respondents

who possessed global brands preferred them due to its global presence, worldwide

reputation, and quality of being a foreign make. The technological superiority of the

global brand makes the respondents to admire the brand. It was also found during the

interview that the respondents mentioned the terms ‘foreign make’, ‘foreignness’,

‘foreign car’, etc…and their liking towards it during the conversations. This indicated

their interest in possessing foreign made products. It was also inferred from the

respondents’ conversations that they trusted foreign made cars that had worldwide

presence. Moreover, country-of-origin of the brand had a substantial influence in the

respondents’ preference for global car brands, wherein they also tried associating the

brands to the country from where it took its origin from and also attaching values such

as technological expertise, superior quality, etc... Good quality and reputation of being

a global brand were the major influencers for their preferences of global brands.

Prestige or status had a very little or no influence in their preference for global car

brands.


74

Examining the effects of country-of-origin assisted to study its influence on consumer

perceptions towards global brands and local brands. All the consumers who were

interviewed were aware of their car’s brand origin. It was found that 7 out of 10

consumers being interviewed were directly influenced by the country-of-origin of

their brand to purchase. Country-of-origin of the brand has a substantial effect on

consumers’ perception of both global and local car brands. It was also found that the

respondents made favorable perceptions of the country, wherein they tend to associate

factors such as superior quality, technical advancements, modernization, etc…to the

country from which the brand had taken its origin. Despite this, there were also very

few respondents who weren’t directly influenced by the country of brand origin.

The respondents who owned a local car brand evaluated the local brand in a favorable

manner, wherein they tend to associate the brand to India’s strong automobile sector

that makes quality and technically efficient cars. Moreover, these respondents also

had a sense of nationality and trust towards the local brands and felt safe in possessing

them. Besides this, most of the respondents who owned a global car brand had a

positive perception towards the country-of-origin, thereby appealing the brand by

associating with its origin. It was also found that these respondents had a fascination

towards their brands as a ‘foreign make’.

Studying the effects of consumer ethnocentrism over global brands assisted to better

understand the respondents’ beliefs and perceptions towards global and local car

brands. Although all the respondents who were interviewed had a positive perception

towards local brands in India, most of the respondents felt that global car brands were

better than Indian brands. Even the respondents, who owned a local brand, had a


75

positive insight towards global brands. The respondents who own a local brand had a

feel of contentment, being safe with the home brand and also trust towards the brand.

Furthermore, they also felt that global car brands were expensive than the local

brands.

It was found that there were consumers who were non-ethnocentric, wherein they

judged foreign products based on their attributes and/or viewed them as better because

they were not produced in their own country. Furthermore, there were also consumers

who were low on CET and were found to be more cosmopolitan in outlook along with

a high degree of cultural openness.


respondents, who possessed local brands, trusted the brands and felt safe with it.

Quality and trust were the major influencers for possessing local brands. Prestige or

status had only a passive role in the respondents’ perception, who owned a local car

brand.

It was revealed that only 3 out of 10 respondents, who were interviewed, believed in

status or prestige of possessing a global car brand. It was also derived that global car

brands appeal more than local car brands to the respondents and also that global car

brands could be consumed in order to gain extra benefits such as quality, worthiness

and attractiveness. Although the global car brands are more expensive than the local

brands, most of the respondents who were interviewed felt that it was worth buying

global brands due its superior quality, technological advancements and reputation as

being global. Apart from these, Global car brands were often associated by the


76

respondents to ‘luxury’, ‘comfortness’ and as a ‘foreign make’. It was significant to

note that most of the respondents perceive local brands to be good in India, but not as

good as the global ones in quality, technical expertise and designs.


77

Chapter Six

6. Conclusions

6.1 Conclusions of the study

This chapter concludes the study by summarising the entire study and also by

highlighting the key findings of the study. The chapter then pursues to the limitations

of the study and presents the recommendations for future research.

The aim of the study was to understand consumer perception of global brands vs.

local brands in the Indian car industry. The car industry in India was undertaken for

the study due to the strong growth of the automobile sector in India. The secondary

objectives of the study highlighted the factors that effect consumer preference for

global brands; examined the effects of country of origin on consumer perceptions of

global brands and local brands; and studied the effects of consumer ethnocentrism

towards global brands. The study initially accomplished the secondary objectives in

order to accomplish the primary objective.

The literature review provided a critical analysis of the views and insights of various

researchers on the subject area and served as a source of secondary data, which were

collected through marketing journals and other existing reports that were based on the

topic. Furthermore, an overview of the Indian car industry was presented in the study

in order to facilitate the reader to comprehend the study in an enhanced way.

Since the aim of the study was to understand consumers’ view of global brands vs.

local brands, qualitative research was preferred to quantitative research. In order to

create a deep understanding of consumers’ insights of global car brands against local


78

car brands, qualitative approach was adopted with an in-depth and semi- structured

interview process. Interviews as a qualitative tool helped the researcher to uncover

individual’s covert feelings and emotions towards perception of global brands vs.

local brands. The study consisted of 10 adult Indian customers in the age group of 30-

60 years old. Telephonic interviews were adopted to study all the 10 customers. The

respondents were already informed of the interviews and were scheduled through

emails according to their convenience. Furthermore, the respondents were explained

the subject oriented terms such as ‘COO’, ‘COBO’, ‘globalness of the brand’, etc…

The reason for explaining these terms were to make the respondents feel more

comfortable with the topic to be interviewed. Each interview lasted for about 30-40

minutes. The main purpose of the interview was to understand consumer perception

of global brands vs. local brands of cars in India. The questions were framed in such a

way that the objectives of the study were addressed accordingly. A pilot interview

was conducted before interviewing the actual recruited respondents, the aim of it

being to test the framed questions for flaws.

The analysis and findings part of the study initiated with the background information

of the respondents who possess a car in India and was then pursued to analysis and

discussion of the findings from the interviews made, wherein the responses were

analysed and discussed with regard to the research objectives of the study. The

distinct responses of the interviewees were critically analysed with the support of the

past literature and also the researchers’ own personal view and experience during the

interviews. Most of the respondents who were interviewed had a good knowledge

about the cars in general, so it was expedient for the researcher thereby obtaining

pragmatic and valuable answers in order to pursue the study. Among the 10


79

respondents interviewed, 4 individuals possessed a local brand and 6 individuals

possessed a global brand. The secondary objectives of the study were first

accomplished in order to achieve the key objective of the study.

Highlighting the factors that effect consumer preference for global car brands assisted


local car brands. By attaining this objective, it was found that the respondents, who

possessed global car brands, preferred their car brands due to factors such as global

presence, worldwide reputation, and quality of being a foreign make. Prestige or

status had a very little or no influence in their preference for global car brands. It was

also inferred from the respondents’ conversations that they trusted foreign made cars

that had worldwide presence. Moreover, country-of-origin of the brand had a

substantial influence in the respondents’ preference for global car brands, wherein

they also tried associating the brands to the country from where it took its origin from

and also attaching values such as technological expertise, superior quality, etc... These

can be inferred from the study conducted by Kinra (2006) that COO credibility of

foreign brands was a significant factor influencing consumer attitudes and preferences

as it was correlated highly with “quality” and “status and esteem”. Above and beyond

all these factors, good quality and reputation of being a global brand were the major

influencers for their preferences of global brands. This could be supported by a

finding from a study by Johansson and Ronkainen (2004), wherein it was told that

global brands enjoy higher levels of esteem and also that global brands were known

for their perceived quality. This was substantiated by Kapferer (1997) that “if a brand

is viewable as globally available, consumers may attribute higher quality to the brand

because such quality is likely to be thought of as critical to global acceptance.”


80

Examining the effects of country-of-origin assisted to study its influence on consumer

perceptions towards global and local car brands. All the consumers who were

interviewed were aware of their car’s brand origin. It was found that 7 out of 10

consumers being interviewed were directly influenced by the country-of-origin of

their brand to purchase. Furthermore the respondents made favourable perceptions of

the country, wherein they tend to associate factors such as superior quality, technical

advancements, modernization, etc…to the country from which the brand had taken its

origin. There were very few respondents who weren’t directly influenced by the

country of brand origin. The respondents who owned a local car brand evaluated the

local brand in a favourable manner, wherein they tend to associate the brand to India’s

strong automobile sector that makes quality and technically efficient cars. These

respondents also had a sense of nationality and trust towards the local brands and felt

safe in possessing them. This backs up the words of Holt et al (2003), who asserted

that “Local brands benefit not only from a good quality image but also from a better

value and trust perception than international brands do”.

Studying the effects of consumer ethnocentrism over global brands assisted to better

understand the respondents’ beliefs and perceptions towards global and local car

brands. This can be justified from the words of Reardon et al (2005), who asserted

that ethnocentricity has substantial implications for consumer attitude formation

towards foreign products/brands, their purchase intentions and choice between

domestic versus foreign-made products.

Although all the respondents who were interviewed had a positive perception towards

local brands in India, most of the respondents felt that global car brands were better


81

than Indian brands. Surprisingly, the respondents, who owned a local brand, also had

a positive insight towards global brands. But the respondents felt that the global car

brands were expensive than the local brands. The study found to have both non-

ethnocentric consumers and consumers who were low on CET. The non-ethnocentric

consumers judged foreign products based on their attributes and/or viewed them as

better because they were not produced in their own country. Consumers, who were

low on CET, were found to be more cosmopolitan in outlook along with a high degree

of cultural openness. This could be inferred to Supphellen and Groundhog (2003) who

states that, in transitional economies, low ethnocentric consumers may have positive

stereotypes of foreign brands.


respondents, who possessed local brands, trusted the brands and felt safe with it.

Quality and trust were the major influencers for possessing local brands. Moreover,

Prestige or status had only a passive role in the respondents’ perception, who owned a

local car brand.

It was revealed that only 3 out of 10 respondents, who were interviewed, believed in

status or prestige of possessing a global car brand. It was also derived that global car

brands appeal more than local car brands to the respondents. Global car brands were

consumed by the respondents in order to gain extra benefits such as quality,

worthiness and attractiveness. The respondents who possess global car brands felt that

it was worth buying global brands due its superior quality, technological

advancements and reputation as being global. Apart from these, Global car brands


82

were often associated by the respondents to ‘luxury’, ‘comfortness’ and as a ‘foreign

make’.

Last but not the least, it was significant to note from the study that most of the

respondents perceive local brands to be good in India, but not as good as the global

ones in quality, technical expertise and designs of the cars.

6.2. Limitations of the study and recommendations for future research

Time was a major constraint for the study. Time being a constraint, limited the study

in certain aspects, as the study was restricted to a period of mere three months.

Additional time would have supported the study by increasing the sample size and

thereby providing more conclusive results.

The interviews limited the researcher to have face-to-face interviews, as the study was

conducted in an Indian Industry. Although telephone interviews helped the researcher

to conduct the study, it wasn’t as effective as face-to-face interviews, as substantial

information was difficult to obtain.

As said by Malhotra (2005) “The research process of an exploratory research is

flexible and unstructured and the sample size is small and non-representative. The

analysis of the exploratory research is qualitative and the results are tentative in

nature”, the sample size undertaken for the study did not represent the whole

population of India. Although care was taken in cautiously interpreting the findings,

the results obtained from the study were tentative in nature, and were generalized.


83

As recommendation for future research works, replications and extension of the same

study could be made by comparing consumer perceptions between a developing

country like India and a developed country. This would serve the study to be more

productive. Furthermore, as this study studied consumers only in the age group of 30-

60, future studies could be undertaken among different age groups as the degree of

their thoughts varies accordingly. Apart from the conducting semi-structured

interviews for understanding the consumers’ thoughts and beliefs, conduct of focus

groups could enhance the study by obtaining views of consumers from different

angles.

Moreover, as time was a constraint, car industry was alone chosen for the study. As a

suggestion for future research, the whole automobile industry could be taken for the

research work. Thus, these recommendations would assist the marketers and

researchers in undertaking future research works.

.


84

References

Aaker, L.J. (1997), “Dimensions of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing

Research, August, pp. 347- 356.

Agarwal, J. and Kamakura, W.A. (1999), “Country of origin: a competitive

advantage?”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 16 (4), pp. 255-

267.

Alden, D.L., Steenkamp, J.E.M. and Batra, R. (1999), “Brand positioning through

advertising in Asia, North America, and Europe: the role of global consumer culture”,

Journal of Marketing, vol. 63, pp. 75- 87.

Al-Sulaiti, K.I. and Baker, M.J. (1998), “Country of origin effects: a literature

review”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 16(3), pp. 39-52.

Bailey, W. and Pineres, S. (1997), “Country of origin attitudes in Mexico: the

Malinchismo effect”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 9 (3), pp.

25-41.

Baker, M.J. (1991), Research for Marketing, Mcmillan education Ltd., London.

Baker, M.J. and Michie, J. (1995), “Product country images: perceptions of Asian

cars”, University of Strathclyde, Department of Marketing, Working Paper, Series

No. 95 (3).

Balabanis, G. and Diamantopoulos, A. (2004), “Domestic country bias, country-of

origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: a multidimensional unfolding approach”,

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 (1), pp. 80-95.

Bannister, J.P. and Saunders, J.A. (1978), “UK consumers’ attitudes towards imports:

the measurement of national stereotype image”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol.

12, pp. 562-70.


85

Batra, R., Ramaswamy, V., Alden, D.L., Steenkamp, J.E.M. and Ramachandran, S.

(2000), “Effects of brand local and non-local origin on consumer attitudes in

developing countries”, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 9 (2), pp.83-95.

Bate, S.P. (1997), “Whatever happened to organizational anthropology? A review of

the field of organisational ethnography and anthropological studies”, Human

Relations, 50 (9), pp. 1147- 1175.

Baughn, C.C. and Yapark, A. (1996) “Economic nationalism: conceptual and

empirical development”, Political Psychology, Vol. 17(4), pp. 759- 778.

Bearden, W.O. and Etzel, M.J. (1982), “Reference group influence on product and

brand purchase decisions”, Journal of Consumer Research, vol.9, pp.183-194.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, K. B. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education, Boston:

Allyn and Bacon.

Catherine Cassell and Gillian Symon (2004), Essential guide to Qualitative Methods

in Organizational Research, 1st edn, ThousandOaks,CA:Sage

Cattin, P., Jolibert, A. and Lohnes, C. (1982), “A cross cultural study of ‘made-in’

concepts”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 13 (3), pp. 131-41.

Chao, P. (1993), “Partitioning country of origin effects: Consumer evaluations of a

hybrid product”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 24(2), pp. 291-306.

Chaudhuri, A. and Holbrook, M. (2001), “The chain of effects from brand trust and

brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty”, Journal of Marketing,

Vol. 65 (2), pp. 81-94.

Chisnall,P.M. (1997), Marketing research, Mc Graw-hill, Bershire.


86

Cresswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.

ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.

Dawar, N. and Parker, P. (1994) “Marketing universals: consumers’ use of brand

name, price, physical appearance, and retailer reputation as signals of product

quality”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, pp. 81- 95.

De Mooij, Marieke (1998), Global Marketing and Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA:

Sage Publications.

Denzin, N. and Lincolnc, Y.S. (1994), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, CA.

Domzal, T. and Unger, L.S. (1987), “Emerging positioning strategies in global

marketing”, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 4 (4), fall, pp. 23-40.

Donald R. Cooper and Pamela S. Schindler (1999), Business Research Methods, 6th

edn, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, India.

Doyle, P. (2002), Marketing Management and Strategy, 3rd edn, Pearson education

Ltd.

Drever, E. (1995), Using semi-structured interviews in small- scale research: a

teachers guide, The Scottish council for research in education: Glasgow.

Ellie Fossey, Carol Harvey, Fiona McDermott and Larry Davidson (2002),

Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research, Australian and New Zealand

Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 36, pp. 717–732.

Eroglu, S.A. and Machleit, K.A. (1989), “Effects of individual and product specific

variables on utilizing country-of-origin as a product cue”, International Marketing

Review, Vol. 6 (6), pp. 27-41.


87

Erickson, G.M., Johansson, J.K. and Chao, P. (1984), “Image variables in

multiattitude product evaluations: country-of-origin effects”, Journal of Consumer

Research, Vol. 11, September, pp. 694-699.

Fatt, J.P.T. (1997), “Communicating a winning image”, Industrial and Commercial

Training, Vol. 29 (5), pp.158-65.

Friedman, J. (1990), “being in the world: globalization and localization”, Theory,

culture, and society, Vol. 7, pp. 311- 328.

Gaedeke, Ralph (1973), “Consumer attitudes towards products ‘made in’ developing

countries”, Journal of Retailing, 49 (Summer), pp.13-24.

Gardner, M. and Houston, M. (1986), “The effects of verbal and visual components of

retail communications”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 62 (1), pp. 64-78.

Ghauri, P. and Cateora, P. (2006), International Marketing, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill

Companies, Berkshire.

Ger, G., Belk, R. and Lascu, D. (1993), “The development of consumer desire in

marketing and developing economies: the cases of Romania and Turkey”, Advances

in Consumer Research, Vol. 20, pp. 102-7.

Good, L.K. and Huddleston, P. (1995), “Ethnocentrism of Polish and Russian

consumers: are feelings and intentions related?”, International Marketing Review,

Vol. 12 (5), pp. 35-48.

Giana M. Eckhardt (2005), “Local Branding in a Foreign Product Category in an

Emerging Market”s, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 13 (4), pp. 57-79.

Han, C. M. and Terpstra. V. (1988), “Country-of-Origin effects for uni-national and

bi-national products” Journal of International Business Studies, (summer), Vol. 19

(2), pp. 235–255.


88

Han, C. M. (1989), “Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct?” Journal of

Marketing Research, 26 (May), 222–29.

Han, C.M. (1990) ‘Testing the role of country image in consumer choice behavior’,

European Journal of Marketing, vol. 26 (6), pg. 24-40.

Harris, R.J., Garner-Earl, B., Sprick, S.J. and Carroll, C. (1994), “Effects of foreign

product names and country-of-origin attributions on advertisement evaluations”,

Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 11 (2), pp. 129-144.

Hassan, S.S. and Katsanis, L.P. (1994), “Global market segmentation strategies and

trends’ in Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E.M., Rajeev Batra, and Dana Alden (2003),

“How Perceived Brand Globalness Creates Brand Value,” Journal of International

Business Studies, Vol. 34 (1),pp. 53–65.

Holliday, A. (2002), Doing and writing qualitative research, Sage, London.

Holt, Douglas, John Quelch, and Earl Taylor (2003), “Managing the Transnational

Brand: How Global Perceptions Drive Value,” working paper, Harvard Business

School.

Interbrand (1990), Brands, Interbrand Group plc, Mercury Business Books, London.

Iyer, G.R. and Kalita, J.K. (1997), “The impact of country-of-origin and country of

manufacture cues on consumer perceptions of quality and value”, Journal of Global

Marketing, Vol. 11 (1), pp. 7-28.

Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G.J. and Busato-Schach, J. (1977), “Information acquisition

behavior in brand choice situations”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 3 (3), pp.

209-16.


89

Johansson, J.K., Douglas, S.P. and Nonaka, I. (1985), “Asssessing the impact of

country of origin on product evaluations: a new methodological perspective”, Journal

of Marketing Research, Vol. 22, pp. 388-396.

Johansson, J.K., Ronkainnen, I.A. and Czinkota, M.R. (1994), “Negative country-of

origin effects: the case of Russia”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25,

pp. 157-76.

Johansson, J.K. and Ilkka A. Ronkainen (2004), “Consider Implications of Local

Brands in a Global Arena”, Marketing News, May 15, pp. 46- 48.

Kapferer, J.N. (1997) Strategic Brand Management, 2nd edn, Kogan Page: Dover, NH.

Kaplan, A. (1964), The conduct of enquiry, Chandler, Scranton.

Kinra, N. (2006), “The effect of country-of-origin on foreign brand names in the

Indian market”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 24 (1), pp.15-30.

Kirmani, A. and Baumgartner, H. (2000), “Reference Points Used in Quality and

Value Judgements”, Marketing Letters, Vol. 11 (4), pp. 299-310.

Kotler, P. (2003), Marketing Management, 11th edn, Pearson education, India.

Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B.H. and Dube, L. (1994), “Foreign branding and its effect on

product perceptions and attitudes”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31 (2), pp.

263-270.

Lee, D. and Schaninger, C. (1996), “Country of production/ assembly as a new

country image construct: a conceptual application to global transplant decision”,

Advances in International Marketing, vol. 7, pp. 233-254.

Levitt, Theodore (1983), “The Globalization of Markets,” Harvard Business Review,

61 (May–June), 92–108.


90

Lim K. and O’ Cass, A (2001), “Consumer brand classifications: an assessment of

culture-of-origin versus country-of-origin”, Journal of Product and Brand

Management, Vol. 10 (2), pp. 120-136.

Lindstrom M (2005), Ensure country of origin is right for your brand, Media: Hong

Kong, June 3, pp. 21.

Malhotra, Naresh K. (2005), Marketing Research: An applied orientation, 4th edn,

Pearson education, India.

McCracken, G. (1986) “Culture and consumption: a theoretical account of the

structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods”, Journal of

Consumer Research, Vol. 13, pp. 71- 84.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks,

CA: Sage.

Mohamad, O., Ahmed, Z.U., Honeycutt,E.D. and Tyebkhan, T.H. (2000), “Does

‘made in….’ matter to consumers? A Malaysian study of country of origin”,

Multinational Business Review, Vol. 8(2), pp.69-73.

Monroe, K. and Krishnan, R. (1985), “The effect of price on subjective product

evaluations”, in Jacoby, J. and Olson, J. (Eds), Perceived Quality: How Consumers

View Stores and Merchandise, Lexington Books, Boston, MA, pp. 209-32.

Papadopoulos, N. (1993), “What product and country images are and are not”, in

Papadopoulos, N. and Heslop, L. (Eds.), Product and Country images, Haworth Press,

New York, NY.

Papadoupoulos, N., Heslop, L.A. and Baossy, G. (eds)., (1993), “Product Country

Images: Impact and Role in International Marketing”, International Business Press,

Binghampton, NY.


91

Paswan, A.K. and Sharma, D. (2004), “Brand-country of origin (COO) knowledge

and COO image: investigation in an emerging franchise market”, Journal of Product

& Brand Management, Vol. 13 (3), pp.144-155.

Patton,M.Q. (1990) 'Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods' Second Edition,

Sage, 1990

Peterson, R.A. and Jolibert, A.J.P. (1995), “A meta-analysis of country-of-origin

effects”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 26 (4), pp. 883-900.

Pitcher, G. (1999) “Consumer brands cull makes room to grow”, Marketing Week,

Vol. 22(40), pp. 23.

Quelch, J. (1999), “Global brands: taking stock”, Business Strategy Review, Vol. 10

(1), pp. 1- 14.

Rao, A. and Monroe, K. (1989), “The effect of price, brand, name and store name on

buyers’ perceptions of product quality: an integrative review”, Journal of Marketing

Research, Vol. 26 (3), pp. 351-8.

Rao, V. (1972), “Changes in explicit information and brand perceptions”, Journal of

Marketing Research, Vol. 9 (9), pp. 209-13.

Ratliff, R. (1989), “Where’s the new car made? Many Americans don’t know” in Lim

K. and O’ Cass, A (2001), “Consumer brand classifications: an assessment of culture

of-origin versus country-of-origin”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol.

10 (2), pp. 120-136.

Reardon, J., Miller, C., Vida, I., Kim, I. (2005), “The effects of ethnocentrism and

economic development on the formation of brand and ad attitudes in transitional

economies”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 (7/8), pp. 737-754.


92

Richard Pinder (2003), “BRANDING: Comment - How thinking global and acting

local can help in trying times”, Media Asia, May, 16, Database: Business Source

Premier.

Rossiter, J.R. and Percy, L. (1987) Advertising and Promotion Management, New

York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Samiee, S. (1994), “Customer evaluation of products in a global market”, Journal of

International Business Studies, Vol. 25 (3), pp. 579-604.

Schuiling, Isabelle and Jean-Noel Kapferer (2004), “Real Differences between Local

and International Brands: Strategic Implications for International Marketers,” Journal

of International Marketing, Vol. 12 (4), 97–112.

Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College

Press.

Sharma, S., Shimp, T. and Shin, J. (1995), “Consumer ethnocentrism: a test of

antecedents and moderators”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 23(1),

pp. 26-37.

Shimp, T.A. and Sharma, S. (1987), “Consumer ethnocentrism: construction and

validation of the CETSCALE”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 24 (3), pp. 280-

289.

Shocker, A.D., Srivastava, R. and Ruekert, R.W. (1994), “Challenges and

opportunities facing brand management: an introduction to the special issue”, Journal

of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, pp. 149- 58.

Shocker, Allan D., Rajendra K. Srivastava, and Robert W. Ruekert (1994),

“Challenges and Opportunities Facing Brand Management: An Introduction to the

Special Issue,” Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (May), 149–58.


93

Silverman, D. (2001), Interpreting qualitative data, Sage, London.

Steenkamp, J.E.M., Batra, R. and Alden, D.L. (2003), “How perceived brand

globalness creates brand value”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 34

(1), pp. 53- 65.

Supphellen, M. and Gronhaug, K. (2003), “Building foreign brand personalities in

Russia: the moderating effect of consumer ethnocentrism”, International Journal of

Advertising, Vol. 22 (2), pp. 203-26.

Susannah Hart, Interbrand (1998), Brands: The New Wealth Creators, Macmillan

Press Ltd, London.

Terpstra, Vern (1987), “The Evolution of International Marketing,” International

Marketing Review, Vol. 4 (summer), 47–59.

Thakor, M.V. and Kohli, C.S. (1996), “Brand origin: conceptualisation and review”,

Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 13 (3), pp. 540-544.

Thakor, M.V. and Lavack, A.M. (2003), “Effect of perceived brand origin

associations on consumer perceptions of quality”, Journal of Product and Brand

Management, Vol. 12(6), pp.394-407.

Thompson, C.J. and Tambyah, S.K. (1999), “Trying to be cosmopolitan”, Journal of

consumer Research, Vol. 26, pp.214- 241.

Van Mannen, J. (1991), “The smile factory: work at Disneyland” in P.J. Frost et al.,

Reframing organizational culture, pp. 58-76.

Veblen, T. B. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.


94

Vida, I. and Fairhurst, A. (1999), “Factors underlying the phenomenon of consumer

ethnocentricity: evidence from four central European countries”, International Review

of Retail and Consumer Research, Vol. 9 (4), pp. 321-37.

Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. W. (1999), “A Review and a Conceptual Framework of

Prestige- Seeking Consumer Behaviour”, Academy of Marketing Science Review, Vol.

1, pp. 1-17.

Wall, M. and Heslop, L.A. (1986), “Consumer attitudes toward Canadian-made

versus imported products”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 14 (2),

pp. 27-36.

Walker, C. (1996) “Can TV save the planet?” American Demographics, vol. 18(May),

pp. 42- 49.

Wang, C.K. and Lamb, C. (1980), “Foreign environmental factors influencing

American consumers’ predisposition towards European products”, Journal of the

Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 8 (4), pp. 345-67.

Wolfe, Alan (1991), “The Single European Market: National of Euro-Brands,”

International Journal of Advertising, 10 (1), 49– 58.

Zambuni, R. (1993), ‘Developing brands across borders’, Journal of Brand

Management’, vol. (1), pp. 22- 29.

Websites

Automotive, IBEF Davos, Jan 25-29 (2006) in

http://ibef.org/download/Automotive_sectoral.pdf, accessed on 10th August 2006.

IBEF (2006) in http://ibef.org/industry/automobiles.aspx, accessed on 10th August

2006.


95

http://auto.indiamart.com/cars, accessed on 15th August 2006.

www.iloveindia.com, accessed on 9th September 2006.


96

Appendix 1

Interview

This interview is conducted as a part of my MA dissertation. The aim of the research

being to understand consumer perception of global brands vs. local brands. The

interview will assist me to examine your perception towards global brands and local

brands in the Indian car industry. I would be really grateful if you assist me in my

research by answering the following questions.

Name

Age

1. What brand is your car?

2. What is the reason for buying this brand?

3. Do you know the brand origin of your car? (the country from which the brand

took its origin from)

Yes No

a. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand origin)?

4. What comes to your mind immediately, the moment you think of your car

brand?

5. What factors (such as quality, value, esteem, status, globalness itself)

influenced you to buy this brand?


97

6. What basic factors are significant to you, in generally choosing a car brand?

7. Do you think that Country of Origin of your brand has a direct influence in

your purchase? (the country from which the brand came from)

8. How do you perceive local brands (such as Tata, Maruthi, etc...)?

9. How do you perceive global brands (such as Ford, BMW, Mercedes, Toyota,

etc...)?

10. If you were about to buy a second car, and were given a choice of a local band

and a global brand, which would you choose?

11. What would be the main reason behind choosing it?

12. If in case the local brand was perceived to be good in terms of “quality” and

“trust” and the global brand being perceived to be good in “prestige”, which

brand would you choose? Why?

13. If in case the price of the local brand was cheaper than the global brand, which


Thank you for your time!!


98

Appendix 2.1

Interview






Name: Arun

Age: 32

What brand is your car?

Maruti Zen

What is the reason for buying this brand?

Well, Maruti cars are generally good…good in quality…in fact provides good

value for money. Gives full satisfaction!! A satisfaction derived from making a right

choice among other cars…It is a friendly car for my family…Its size (small) also

matters….it is user friendly…I usually don’t go for the big size vehicles like Ford,

Opel, and others…Maruti is always good!!

Do you know the brand origin of your car?

Yes No

a. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand

origin)?

Yes, TRUST!!!! I trust the brand, ‘Maruti’. I trust because it is made in

India….It is from India!! Although it is purely because of trust….some

times I get the feel of our own Nationality. And moreover, India is getting


99

rich and stronger in its automobile sector and I also trust the cars made in

our country….

What comes to your mind immediately, the moment you think of your car

brand?

A renowned brand in India…..The largest selling brand in India…I can as well think

of its reputation and quality that the brand offers. A good Indian brand above all and

cant think of anything else…..

What factors (such as quality, value, esteem, status, globalness per se) influenced

you to buy this brand?

Hmmm…it is just quality and value. The quality in car as well its service. I normally

don’t look for esteem or status….but just go for quality and trust…and I am being

satisfied with quality and trust by buying ‘Maruti’ brand. Indeed, it gives me good

value for money….. Thus I can’t think of any other factors apart from these.

What basic factors are significant to you, in generally choosing a car brand?

Not only in buying ‘Maruti’, but also in buying any other car brand, I just seek trust,

quality and value for money and nothing else. And these are the factors that would

help me in selecting a car brand… (Why not status?) I would not buy a car brand for

prestige or status!! Just because, it is not going to add any extra value to me or to the

car.

Do you think that Country of Origin of your brand has a direct influence in your

purchase?

Off course, ‘Maruti’ being an Indian brand…makes me to trust my country owned

brand. India manufactures and sells quality cars and is also technically efficient. So I

can easily relate car brands from India to quality and technically efficient ones.


100

How do you perceive local brands (such as Tata, Maruti etc...)?

I feel local brands in India can be trusted although there is a presence of numerous

global brands on the roads. Local brands are equally good in quality. Local brands are

to be trusted.

How do you perceive global brands (such as Ford, BMW, Mercedes, Toyota,

etc...)?

Global brands….well I don’t fancy global brands much….but I have seen people

fancy global brands due its ‘globalness’ itself…And being in India, I feel that local

brands compete equally with global brands in all means…..I mean the quality and

technical aspects….I don’t mean that I neglect global brands…but just feel safe with

local brands…..

If you were about to buy a second car, and were given a choice of a local band


Ha ha ha…a good question……but my answer is simple…I would just choose local

brand…..

What would be the main reason behind choosing it?

A local brand mainly because I feel safe and I trust them…I also have the feel that it

is my own country brand, saying an ‘Indian car brand’.

If in case the local brand was perceived to be good in terms of “quality” and



Again my answer would be local brands….good in quality, trust and above all a sense

of nationality. Even though prestige is needed in life…..global car brands wouldn’t

make any difference…possessing a good local car brand also signifies status to me....


101

If in case the price of the global brand was cheaper than the local brand, which


Seems a bit tricky to answer…I would first compare the prices….if the local brands

are slightly expensive than global brands, then I would definitely buy only the local

brand….just because of trust…But if the price of the local brand is going to be very

expensive….then I would consider in buying global brand…..despite this, I always

feel local brands are better due to the factors that I have already mentioned…..

Thank you!!


102

Appendix 2.2 Interview






Name: Sathish

Age: 35


Ford Ikon


Simply because it’s Ford…a good brand with good reputation.

Do you know the brand origin of your car?

Yes No

b. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand

origin)?

Ya….I do know the country from which the brand came into. But I don’t

tend to relate it to the country…I just see it as a global brand. So, there is

nothing that I feel attached to the country.


103


brand?

Its reputation as a brand that has a world wide presence and its quality….I said

reputation because; many people all over the world fancy the brand….As a worldwide

brand, Ford stands for its quality.

What factors (such as quality, value, esteem, status, globalness per se) influenced


I would first tell its word wide presence….ya its globalness as you said…then comes

status and quality…Ford brand is really good. All these factors add value to the car

and eventually made me to buy this brand.


Quality and then reputation…..both are important to me when choosing a car brand.

Well, I should also add foreign make….I like them a lot. Foreign brands give me full

satisfaction……


purchase?

No not at all….because, I don’t feel that it is American and I didn’t buy because its

origin is America. But when I think of Ford…it is just the foreign make. So I think it

is a kind of indirect influence that has made me buy the brand….

How do you perceive local brands (such as Tata, Maruti, etc...)?

They are good brands…. (In what way is it good?) Good in quality and less expensive

than foreign brands….but I feel that with the presence of large global brands, local

brands seldom stand out of the crowd…….


etc...)? They are excellent in quality, and the designs of these cars are too good…also


104

technically efficient. People always give a second look on foreign cars (global ones).

Thus it is of great prestige in possessing global brands. I feel privileged when I travel

in Ford…..feel good having Ford, a foreign brand.



I would choose global brand... I have a craze for global brands... and especially

cars…..local brands are also good but with the choice of global brands, I would

definitely select global brands…


The reason for choosing global brands is because of its exhaustive quality and the

prestige of having a global brand and nothing else. I feel that a foreign brand gives

extra value in the purchase of a car brand…




I would definitely go for global brand…although quality and trust are important for

choosing a car brand, I perceive global brands to be equally good…and off course,

prestige is also important for me…..I think a global brand that is perceived to be good

in prestige, would also be good in quality.

If in case the price of the local brand was cheaper than the global brand, which


I will choose the global brand.....as I have already said that I really admire and also

they are appealing than local brands….I wouldn’t mind to spend extra cost for buying

a global brand….even if they are going to be really higher than the local


105

brands…because they would give me the extra benefits for which I am going to

spend….the extra benefits are the quality, worthiness, attractive….

Thank you!!


106

Appendix 2.3 Interview






Name: Napoleon

Age: 51


Tata Safari


It is a good brand and Tata is a well known brand in the whole of India….I trust the

brand…because it is efficient in quality…

Do you know the brand origin of your car? (the country from which the brand


Yes No

c. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand origin)?

Yes, it is an Indian make…but, there is nothing that makes me attached to

the country. It is only the brand’s reputation in India.


107


brand?

Trust and quality are the ones that come to my mind, when I think of my car

brand…Most of the people in India are aware that ‘Tata’ brand stands for trust…..and

even I can think of trust when I see my car brand…the trust that the company creates

and the brand also…

What factors (such as quality, value, esteem, status, globalness itself) influenced


I would first tell, quality…the quality lasts longer…it is also good value for

money…and not to forget the trust, that the brand creates. The ‘Tata’ branded cars are

worth buying…..theses were the factors that led me to buy this brand.


I would look into the brand name and the quality of the brand. The reputation of the

brand is also important to me…..i.e., the brand should be well established so that it

can be trusted. These are the basic factors that I would look in to.


purchase? (the country from which the brand came from)

No, I don’t think that country from which the brand came from, has a direct influence

in my purchase…because I only see the brand name as being ‘Tata’ and its reputation

in India….Might have an indirect influence, being an Indian brand…


The local brands in India are very good in terms of value and quality…they are

technically good and also have good models of cars….lots of new models are also

being rapidly launched…local brands have cars that meets the low-end consumers and

the high end consumers in terms of income. Local brands are really good.


108


etc...)?

Global brands are actually better than local brands in quality….these brands are

known for its luxury and are posh on Indian roads...but most of these brands don’t

have presence all over the country….they are just present in the metropolitan

cities…..they are also expensive than local brands…



I would choose the local brand….in my view; local brands are good in India


The main reason for choosing it is because of its quality and the trust I have on Indian

brands…..today, India is performing well in automobile sector and the local brands

have country wide presence and this makes me easily trust the local brands in

India…the cars are also technically good and lasts longer….very durable….they are

worth buying and are reasonable in price.




I would again choose local brand…if the local brand is going to be perceived good in

quality and in trust….I wouldn’t give me an alternative to choose from…prestige is

not important for me….I will not think of prestige or status in choosing a car

brand….just to add one more point to the answer, I would tell that local brands in

India are also prestigious…..the new models being introduced by Indian companies


109

itself shows this…they are good in luxury and convey status and prestige…Although,

prestige and status are not important to me…

If in case the price of the global brand was cheaper than the local brand, which


I will choose local brand…it is just the trust and quality.



110

Appendix 2.4

Interview






Name: Arumugasamy

Age: 60


Hyundai Santro


The brand ‘Hyundai’ is a very well established brand….and especially Hyundai

Santro…..the brand has good fame...it is also a foreign brand!! Above all, the brand is

well known….



Yes No

d. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand origin)?

Yes, it is a Korean make…Generally, Korean makes are excellent…They

are technically good and they are durable in best in quality…


111


brand?

It is a Korean make….a brand from Korea that has world wide reputation and has got

good fame….. The brand that is well known for its technical expertise…



Hmmm...Factors such as quality and good reputation have influenced me to buy this

brand….It is also the brand name, ‘Hyundai’ that influenced my purchase…because it

is a very good make….


Quality would be the major factor…The brand name and its make would also be

significant to me….Brand name and the make are very important because this would

help in judging the quality.



Yes, the place from where the brand came into existence has a direct influence in my

purchase…. I feel that Korean products in general are good for it quality technical

expertise…they are very tough and sturdy….Korea is always famous for its technical

products and equipments…..


Local brands in India have good reputation and can always be trusted… as the brands

are well established for years, they can be trusted easily without giving a second

thought….and a brand such as ‘Tata’ can be trusted as the brand stands for its

trust….Local brands in India are good… and are also affordable than the foreign

brands…


112


etc...)?

Global brands convey its presence everywhere in the world…people all over the

world can recognize the brand name…foreign makes that have worldwide presence

are best in quality but expensive to afford it……it is luxurious to possess a global

brand in a country like India…



I would buy a global brand….such as Hyundai….or a Ford…..because of its fame as

global brand and its presence all over the world…


Global brands has good reputation all over the world…It makes me trust the brand,

just because it is a Korean make or a American make….and the quality that comes to

my mind because of being a foreign make…I will have a feel of satisfaction that I

have foreign brand….a ‘worldwide’ brand….




If the local brand is to be very good in quality and trust, then I would go for

it…..Even if it is going to be the global brand, I would just seek quality, trust, and

its reputation and not prestige…..even if I am about to select a global brand, I

wouldn’t go for it due to its prestige….but due to its world wide presence and

reputation….




113

I will choose the global bland even if the price is going to be significantly higher than

the local brand….I wouldn’t mind spending extra costs in getting the global

brand….as it is going to give me extra quality and the trust due to its worldwide

presence… Money doesn’t really matter, only quality and trust that matters in

selecting a car brand. Although local brands are good in both, global brands are still

better than that….



114

Appendix 2.5

Interview






Name: Surendhran

Age: 33


Skoda Octavia


Skoda was my dream car that I wished to buy from a very long time…the foreign

make is also one of the reasons for buying it….also because it is a luxury car in the

car industry.



Yes No

e. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand

origin)?

Yes, I just know that it is a European make….It is known for its well built

cars with powerful engines….Europe is generally superior in

manufacturing cars that are robust…


115


brand?

Its elegance…..and comfortness are the initial ones that come to my mind

immediately… Skoda cars also stand for their powerful engines and luxury

interiors….



I would just tell esteem and globalness, which made me buy the brand... also because

of the foreign make and international presence that would boost up the reason…Skoda

is good in quality as well….but ‘esteem’ in possessing the car and ‘foreignness’ of the

brand were the major influencers that backed up my purchase……


Durability of cars of the brand and also the reputation it has among public are

important for me in choosing a brand…If it is a global brand, my perception of quality

would be higher…it is because most of the global brands like Ford, Mercedes in India

have very good reputation…..



Yes I do feel that country of origin of the brand has a direct influence in my purchase,

just because I felt that the European cars are best for their powerful engines, for its

ruggedness and quality…I just relate European countries with its richness in making

cars…..


Local brand are good too….especially in India…the Indian automobile brands are all-

over the country….and they are also rapidly moving in to foreign countries…and this


116

increases the trust towards the brands among the people…..Although the brands are

good and can be trusted….I would still feel global brands are better …in terms of

quality and fame of the brands…


etc...)?

Global brands are fabulous…Skoda, BMW, Mercedes, etc…are excellent in their

quality and are very much technically advanced….foreign branded cars are

inspiring in their models and designs…and very very sturdy on Indian roads….



I will 100% buy a global brand…probably Toyota, which is well reputed Japanese

brand…


A ‘global brand’, because of its foreignness and worldwide reputation… I would

choose a local brand in India, but with the presence of a global brand, I will

choose the global brand for sure….as local brands are also good in India, but not

as good as the global ones in quality, technical expertise and designs




My answer would always be global, yeah…prestige is also significant for me

apart from quality and trust…..I feel that it adds value to my personal life….and I

am quite sure that if the global brand is to be perceived good in terms of

‘prestige’, then it should be good in its ‘quality’ and ‘trust’.


117



Despite the price of the global brand being higher than the local brand, I would

still go for the global brand and will not bother to spend the higher cost in order to

possess the foreign brand…the reasons would be due to the features that I have

already said above....



118

Appendix 2.6

Interview






Name: Lambodharan

Age: 38


Honda City


It is a reputed brand in the automobile industry…It is a Japanese brand…being

always best in its quality….



Yes No

f. If yes, what makes you attached to the country (of the brand origin)?

Ya, as I said, it is from Japan. Japan is known for its technological

advancements and advanced engineering manufactures. Japan is especially

best for making very very high quality cars…


119


brand?

Its quality and sturdiness….By sturdiness, I mean its ruggedness on the roads due to

its quality make… I can also think of the reputation of the brand ‘Honda’….and

nothing else other than this…a very strong brand in India...



I was first influenced by its foreign make…..and then the brand being from Japan,

made me to trust its quality…It is trusted and preferred by a large number of

people in India itself….People who possessed the brand were satisfied with

the brand and this increased my trust….ya…globalness can also be one of the

reasons….as it has presence and being trusted all over the world….


Quality of the make and reputation of the brand among people are most important

ones that I rely on before choosing a brand…the reputation of the brand would

tell me if the brand is good or bad in making cars…



Yes… Only because the brand was a Japanese make, I bought the brand…Japan’s

advanced engineering works and technological advancements in making cars had a

direct influence in my purchase…


According to me, local brands in India are good….they can be trusted. They can be

trusted because of well-established brands like Maruti and Tata…They have strong


120

reputation in the Indian market…As the brands are made in India, most of the people

trust the brands and they feel safe buying it…..


etc...)?

Global car brands are the best to me…their foreign make would speak its

quality…And I feel that foreign brands are majestic on Indian roads…they stand out

among the local brands….although global car brands don’t suit the Indian roads that

are uneven and rough, they are very comfortable to drive and gives a stress-free

drive…



My choice would definitely be a global car brand….I really fancy them a lot…


I trust them for their quality and for the service they provide… As global brands, their

presence across the globe makes me trust the brand even more… their quality of make

is better than the local brands




I would still prefer the global car brand….although prestige is not a necessity for

me…I wouldn’t mind buying a global brand that would bring status to me. Because,

global car brands are always better than local car brands to me…better in quality and

are very comfortable….




121

Even an expensive global car brand is worth buying because of its value and long

lasting durability. They are reliable in quality and admirable in design and

make…Especially Honda gives me stress-free drives….and extremely well in its

quality make….


Consumer Perception of Global vs. Local Brands:The Indian Car Industry

Documents

Transcript of Consumer Perception of Global vs. Local Brands:The Indian Car Industry