Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu
-
Upload
alfonso-cleveland -
Category
Documents
-
view
38 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP 6 December 2011, Tartu
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP
6 December 2011, Tartu
Consultation seminar on the preparation of full Application Form for LSP
6 December 2011, Tartu
LogframeLogframe
1
Logical Framework:
• In most of cases needs the improvement!!!
• Work with the Applicant on it – to make it consistent with the Description of the Action
• Ideally a contract to be signed with a proper Logical framework:
• It will help to the Applicant and partners in Action’s implementation
• Will serve to the monitoring purposes
• But keeping it aside the contract and still using for monitoring purpose could also be an option
Adjustments - LogframeAdjustments - Logframe
Logframe – project design logicLogframe – project design logic
Intervention logic
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement
Sources and means of verification Assumptions
Overall objectives1
Specific objective
2
Expected results
3
Activities
4 Means Costs
Logframe – adjustments logicLogframe – adjustments logic
Intervention logic
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement
Sources and means of verification Assumptions
Overall objectives
4
Specific objective
3
Expected results 1
Activities
2 Means Costs
Logframe – verification logicLogframe – verification logic
Intervention logic
Objectively verifiable indicators of achievement
Sources and means of verification Assumptions
Overall objectives
Specific objective
Expected results
Activities Means Costs
A different, ”third” logic of working!
• Identify which parts of the AForm corresponds to each level of the Logframe
• Start from Results and Outputs
• The most important part, usually more or less well formulated
• To be checked against AForm, formulations adjusted if needed
• Normally shouldn’t change during the project implementation, whereas Activities could be adjusted
• How do you reflect Outputs, which are not in the Logframe but are undispensable to formulate the Results?
LogframeLogframe
• When the results are formulated, check the Activities, which contribute to them (passing by Outputs)
• Make sure that all the activities are attributed to a Result
• The Activities are sufficient to achieve the results
• Check that indicators are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound)
• Realistic indicators
• Check sources of verification...
• Risks/assumptions very important!
• Ex: reducing polution of the river by 20%, but it’s poluted upstream
LogframeLogframe
• Is the vertical logic complete and accurate?
• Are the indicators and sources of verification available and reliable?
• Are assumptions and preconditions realistic?
• Are risks acceptable?
• Is the probability of achieving the objectives high?
• Are programme principles taken into account? (cross-border impact, equal opportunities, etc.)
• Are the expenses justified by the expected benefits?
Logframe - verificationLogframe - verification
Further InformationFurther Information
JOINT TECHNICAL SECRETARIATPhone: +371 6750 9520
Fax: +371 6750 9523E-mail: [email protected]
Ausekļa Street 14 – 3rd Floor, Riga, LV-1010, Latvia