Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

23
Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation

Transcript of Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

Page 1: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

Construction Defect Litigation

CAS Ratemaking Seminar

2005

Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation

Page 2: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION

• Background

• Legal Developments

• Emerging Issues

1

Page 3: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

BACKGROUND

• California Population Growth between 1980 – 1996

– United States Population grew by 16.7%

– California Population grew by 36%

– 2.8 Million New Housing Units Built (1 for each 3 new residents)

– Demand For Housing Exceeded Supply By Over 600,000 Units

2

Page 4: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

WHEN HOUSING DEMAND OUTPACES SUPPLY

• Builders Rush to Meet Demand

• Unskilled Construction Labor Enters the Market

• Laborers Are Unsupervised

• Short-Cuts are Taken

• Construction of Multi-Family Units

• Construction on Difficult Sites

3

Page 5: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

IN MATHEMATICAL TERMS

Unskilled Labor

+ Poor / No Supervision

+ Unrealistic Deadlines

____________________________________

= Substandard Housing

4

Page 6: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN SUBSTANDARD HOUSING IS SOLD?

• Got Litigation?

5

Page 7: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

HERE COME THE SUITS

• Owners Paid a lot of Money for the Homes

• Lots of Lawyers

• Early Suits Were Successful

• Suits Brought in the Name of HOA

• You Better Sue or Get Sued

• Plaintiff Only needs to Sue the Developer

6

Page 8: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SUITS

• Fact and Documents Intensive

• Long Statutes of Limitations (Latent & Patent)

• Expert Driven

• Numerous Site Inspections

• Destructive Testing

• Many Cross-Complaints

7

Page 9: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS (Continued)

• Extremely High Defense Costs

• Numerous Coverage Issues & Disputes

• Strict Liability for the Developer

• Difficult to Settle

8

Page 10: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

WHAT ARE THESE CONSTRUCTION DEFECTS?

9

Page 11: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

CATEGORIES OF DEFECTS

• DEFECT

• Framing

• Roofing

• Poor Soil Prep

• Window Install

• Electrical

• Masonry

• Plumbing

• EFFECT

• Structural Failure

• Water Intrusion

• Cracked Foundations

• Water Intrusion

• Fires

• Retaining Wall Failures

• Water Damage

10

Page 12: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

ARE THESE DEFECTS INSURABLE?

• Per Policy Holder – “I bought insurance to cover me for everything”

• Per Insurance Company – Yes & No. Resultant Damage is Covered but Work Product is Not

• Courts – We Will Do Everything We Can to Find Coverage

11

Page 13: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS

• Montrose I (1993)

• Montrose II (1995)

• Calderon Act (1997)

• Presley V. American States (2001)

• Chapter 40 - Nevada

12

Page 14: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

MONTROSE CHEMICAL vs. SUPERIOR COURT

• Issue – Is an Insurer Obligated to Defend With Respect to a Proceeding Related to a Discharge of Hazardous Substances

• Ruling – Complaint Only Needs to Allege that Damages May Have Occurred to Trigger a Defense Obligation

• Impact – Leads to the Defense of More Claims, More Frequency

13

Page 15: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

MONTROSE CHEMICAL vs. ADMIRAL INSURANCE

• Issue – Is There a Continuous Injury Trigger for the Duty to Defend Hazardous Waste Actions

• Ruling – All Insurers “From Shovel to Gavel” Have Potential Liability. Many Policies for Each Party May Apply

• Impact – Increases Claims Frequency & Makes Them More Complicated

14

Page 16: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

CALDERON ACT

• Legislative Effort to Reduce CD Litigation

• Required Communication Between Owner & Builder as Pre-Requisite to a Suit

• Encourages Mediation Efforts

• Plaintiff Used as Tool to Get Information

• Generally Ineffective In Resolving Claims Without Litigation

15

Page 17: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

PRESLEY HOMES vs. AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE

• Issue – Does an Additional Insured Endorsement on a Sub-Contractors Policy in Favor of the Developer Require that the Issuing Carrier Defend Developer?

• Ruling – A Duty to Defend the Entire Action Applies if there is a Mere Potential for Coverage

• Impact – Shifts Much of the Defense Costs to Subs, Some Peripheral

16

Page 18: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

CHAPTER 40 – NEVADA LAW

• Cumbersome Rules & Deadlines

• Puts Onerous Duties on Builder

• Right to Repair but Owner Must Approve Repair

• Allows Plaintiff to Recover Attorney’s Fees, Costs and Interest if Successful in Trial

17

Page 19: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

EMERGING ISSUES

18

Page 20: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

MITIGATION EFFORTS

• Settlement Efforts

• Coverage Restrictions

19

Page 21: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

SETTLEMENT PRIOR TO TRIAL

• Specialized Mediators Appointed by the Court

• Creative Approaches Such As CPR

• Extremely Expensive to Try

• Jury’s Biased Towards Homeowners

• Be Prepared to Try a Case that is Winable

20

Page 22: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

COVERAGE RESTRICTIONS

• Montrose Exclusions – Many Variations

• Wasting Limits Policies – Expense in Limits

• SIR’s, Deductables

• Prior Defects Exclusions

• COE Requirements

• Subsidence Exclusions

• Mold Exclusions

• BE SURE TO MAKE IT CLEAR!!

21

Page 23: Construction Defect Litigation CAS Ratemaking Seminar 2005 Peter S. Mack, Markel Corporation.

OH… THOSE CREATIVE LAWYERS!!

• So Much Money at Stake

• Mold BI and PD Claims

• Sulfate Claims

• WHO KNOWS WHAT ELSE!!

22