Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data:...

11
Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D. Moroni (JPL) IOVWST Meeting, Annapolis, Maryland, 9-11 May 2011 = ? QuikSCAT Jason ARGO AMSR-E

Transcript of Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data:...

Page 1: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice modelwith level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results

D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D. Moroni (JPL)IOVWST Meeting, Annapolis, Maryland, 9-11 May 2011

=?QuikSCAT

Jason

ARGO

AMSR-E

Page 2: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

RMS QSCAT 2004 wind stress (Bourassa 2006)

RMS( baseline – QSCAT stress )

RMS baseline simulation 2004 wind stress (ECMWF)

Pa

Pa

Page 3: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Cost function reduction

Forward/adjoint iteration

ARGO S cost reduction

ARGO T cost reduction

Dep

th (m

)D

epth

(m)

normalized cost

baseline

baseline

baseline cost

optimized

optimized cost

optimized

Adjoint-method optimization of an eddying global-oceanand sea ice MITgcm configuration.• Control variables are initial T/S and atmospheric boundary conditions.• Data constraints currently include JASON SLA, AMSR-E SST, ARGO T/S profiles, and OCCA T/S climatology.

Page 4: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

RMS( optimized – Jason SLA ) – RMS( baseline – Jason SLA )

RMS( optimized – AMSRE SST ) – RMS( baseline – AMSRE SST )

∘C

m

Page 5: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Adjustment of initial temperature at the 154-m depth

Adjustment of initial temperature at the 634-m depth

∘C

∘C

Page 6: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Adjustment of initial salinity at the 154-m depth

Adjustment of initial salinity at the 634-m depth

Page 7: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

m/s

m/s

Standard deviation of zonal wind adjustment

Time-mean of zonal wind adjustment

Page 8: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Is optimized solution closer to QSCAT stress than baseline solution?

=?QuikSCAT

Jason

ARGO

AMSR-E

Page 9: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Is optimized solution closer to QSCAT stress than baseline solution?

RMS( baseline – QSCAT stress )

Pa

Page 10: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Is optimized solution closer to QSCAT stress than baseline solution?

RMS( baseline – QSCAT stress )

RMS( optimized – QSCAT stress ) – RMS( baseline – QSCAT stress )

Pa

Pa

Page 11: Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.

Summary and concluding remarks• A global, eddying ocean and sea ice simulation has been constrained by altimeter, SST, and in situ data using the adjoint method.• The optimized solution, however, is NOT closer to QSCAT wind stress retrievals obtained using the Bourassa (2006) drag coefficient.• Possible causes include problems with ocean model, with bulk formulae, with optimization, with QSCAT wind stress retrievals, etc.• State estimation provides a rigorous test of consistency of ocean observations and models.

Next steps• Repeat analysis with improved QSCAT wind stress retrievals, as they become available.• Incorporate a sea-state dependent surface flux parameterization in the model.• Incorporate QSCAT constraints in the optimization.

QSCAT cost reduction after one forward/adjoint iteration that includes QSCAT data constraints