Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site ...
Transcript of Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site ...
Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotidebinding site–leucine rich repeat protein encoded at the Rxlocus of potato
Abdelhafid Bendahmaney Garry Farnham, Peter Moffett and David C. Baulcombe�
The Sainsbury Laboratory, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
Received 25 April 2002; revised 13 June 2002; accepted 14 June 2002.�For correspondence (fax þ44 1603 250024; e-mail [email protected]).yPresent address: INRA-URGV, 2 Rue Gaston Cremieux CP 5708, 91057 Evry Cedex, France.
Summary
Rx in potato encodes a protein with a nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeats (LRR) that
confers resistance against Potato virus X. The NBS and LRR domains in Rx are present in many disease
resistance proteins in plants and in regulators of apoptosis in animals. To investigate structure-function
relationships of NBS-LRR proteins we exploited the potential of Rx to mediate a cell death response. With
wild-type Rx cell death is elicited only in the presence of the viral coat protein. However, following random
mutagenesis of Rx, we identified mutants in which cell death is activated in the absence of viral coat
protein. Out of 2500 Rx clones tested there were seven constitutive gain-of-function mutants carrying eight
independent mutations. The mutations encoded changes in the LRR or in conserved RNBS-D and MHD
motifs of the NBS. Based on these findings we propose that there are inhibitory domains in the NBS and
LRR. The constitutive gain-of-function phenotypes would be due to deletion or modification of these
inhibitory domains. However activation of Rx is not simply release of negative regulation by the LRR and
adjacent sequence because deleted forms of Rx that lack constitutive gain of function mutations are not
active unless the protein is overexpressed.
Keywords: potato virus X; coat protein; hypersensitive response; cell death.
Introduction
Many disease resistance (R) genes in plants encode pro-
teins with nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine rich
repeat (LRR) domains (Ellis et al., 2000; Hammond-Kosack
and Jones, 1997). Genetic evidence indicates that these
NBS-LRR proteins are receptors that interact, directly or
indirectly, with elicitors produced by the pathogen. Follow-
ing recognition there is activation of downstream signalling
pathways leading to disease resistance and a hypersensi-
tive response (HR) that is manifested as cell death (Shirasu
and Schulze-Lefert, 2000).
In common with other receptors it is generally considered
that NBS-LRR proteins have a modular structure with sepa-
rate recognition and signalling domains. The LRR is a
candidate recognition domain because it is the most vari-
able region in closely related NBS-LRR proteins and is
under selection to diverge (Meyers et al., 1998; Noel et al.,
1999). Functional analysis of recombinant R proteins also
indicates that recognition specificity resides in the LRR (Ellis
et al., 1999). However, there is indirect evidence that the
LRR can contribute to signalling as well as recognition.
(Banerjee et al., 2001; Warren et al., 1998)
The amino terminal region in NBS-LRR R proteins is
thought to be the major signalling domain. In most NBS-
LRR proteins this region includes either a Toll-interleukin
receptor (TIR)-like domain or a putative coiled-coil (CC)
structure (Ellis et al., 2000). In Arabidopsis, TIR-NBS-LRR
proteins apparently signal through the EDS1 lipase-like
protein, whereas CC-NBS-LRR proteins require pathways
involving NDR1 (Aarts et al., 1998). RPS7 and RPP8 are NBS-
LRR proteins but do not have absolute dependency on
EDS1 or NDR1 and it is thought that they signal through
a novel, as yet uncharacterized, pathway (McDowell et al.,
2000). In some NBS-LRR proteins the amino terminal
domain may be involved in recognition as well as signal-
ling. For example, from the novel resistance specificity of
recombinant L6, L2 and LH flax rust R genes, it seems likely
The Plant Journal (2002) 32, 195–204
� 2002 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 195
that recognition can be influenced by a TIR domain (Ellis
et al., 1999; Luck et al., 2000).
The NBS is positioned between the putative signalling
domain and the LRR. Its precise function is not known but
there are clues from sequence motifs that are also present
in the NBS of CED-4 (C. elegans) and APAF-1 (human)
regulators of apoptosis (Aravind et al., 1999; van der Biezen
and Jones, 1998). The common sequences include the P
loop (kinase 1), kinase 2 and kinase 3a and other motifs
found in ATPase proteins from both prokaryotes and eukar-
yotes (Aravind et al., 1999). Mutation analysis indicates that
at least some of these motifs are required for the function of
R proteins (Axtell et al., 2001; Dinesh-Kumar et al., 2000; Tao
et al., 2000; Tornero et al., 2002). By analogy to APAF-1 and
similar proteins, it seems likely that ATPase activity in NBS-
LRR proteins mediates conformational changes necessary
for downstream signalling and disease resistance (Hu et al.,
1999).
Indirect evidence from the nematode resistance gene Mi
indicates how the activity of NBS-LRR proteins could be
controlled (Hwang et al., 2000). Recombinant Mi proteins
containing elements of a non-functional Mi homologue
activate an HR in the absence of elicitor. To explain this
result it was proposed that there are intra-molecular inter-
actions between domains of Mi. In the wild-type protein in
the absence of elicitor these interactions would prevent
signalling of disease resistance and cell death. Modifica-
tion of the interaction, either following elicitor recognition
or by mismatch of interacting residues in the recombinant
proteins, would allow the signalling domains of Mi to
activate the response pathways. The lesion mimic pheno-
type of a natural recombinant of the Rp1 resistance gene in
maize (Sun et al., 2001) is also consistent with this inter-
pretation.
Here we investigate structure-function relationships in
the CC-NBS-LRR protein encoded by Rx. Rx confers
resistance against Potato virus X (PVX) in potato (Cocker-
ham, 1970) and the elicitor is the viral coat protein (CP)
(Bendahmane et al., 1995). Rx-mediated resistance is unu-
sual in that it is not normally associated with an HR either in
potato or as a transgene in Nicotiana species (Bendahmane
et al., 1999). However transgenic expression of the CP elicits
an Rx-dependent HR in potato and in Nicotiana species
(Bendahmane et al., 1999). Our approach to the analysis of
Rx involved screening for Rx mutants that mediate an HR in
the absence of the elicitor CP. We also tested the over-
expression of wild type and deleted forms of Rx for an
elicitor-independent HR. Our results imply that conserved
motifs in the NBS and LRR regions of Rx regulate a signal-
ling domain in the amino terminal region. As deletion or
mutation of these motifs leads to gain of Rx function it is
likely that they have an inhibitory role in the wild-type
protein. Presumably this inhibitory function is abrogated
in the presence of the coat protein elicitor.
Results
Random mutagenesis of Rx
To address the possible role of the NBS and other domains
in Rx we screened for Rx mutants in which an HR was
activated in the absence of the elicitor PVX CP. The mutants
were generated by PCR of Rx cDNA under conditions
leading to misincorporation of nucleotides. The PCR
products were then inserted between the promoter and
transcriptional terminator of Rx (Figure 1a, pR-AT) and
the constructs were assembled in the T-DNA region of an
Agrobacterium binary plasmid vector. A library of Rx
mutants was generated and individual clones were assayed
for HR induction by infiltration of liquid Agrobacterium
cultures into leaves of Nicotiana tabacum. All experiments
were repeated at least three times with several replicates in
each experiment and the data, as presented here, were
consistent and reproducible in all instances.
Agrobacterium cultures carrying a wild-type Rx cDNA
construct (pR-Rx; Figure 1a) did not induce an HR when
infiltrated into non-transformed N. tabacum leaves. How-
ever, when this construct was infiltrated into transgenic N.
tabacum producing the CP of PVX (Spillane et al., 1997),
there was necrosis after 48 h and death of the infiltrated
region by 72 h (Figure 1b). Presumably the transiently
expressed Rx had recognized the elicitor CP and activated
signalling leading to cell death.
Out of 2500 mutant Rx clones tested there were seven that
induced an HR in the leaves of non-transformed N. tabacum.
Figure 1(b) illustrates the HR phenotype of one of these con-
stitutive gain-of-function mutants (AT25). Four of the
mutants (AT39, AT193, AT25, and AT7) induced an HR within
48 h of Agrobacterium infiltration. The others (AT32, AT72
and AT28) induced an HR that was delayed until 48–72 h post
infiltration.Thesegain-of-functionmutantsallshowedanHR
in the presence of the coat protein (Figure 1b).
Constitutive gain-of-function mutants are modified in the
NBS and LRR domains
DNA sequence analysis revealed that each of the constitu-
tive gain-of-function forms of Rx carries between three and
11 amino acid substitutions relative to the wild type. To
identify the amino acid substitutions implicated in the
activation of Rx we constructed a series of recombinant
molecules incorporating elements of the wild type and
constitutive gain-of-function mutants. For each of the
gain-of-function mutants we identified recombinant mole-
cules with a single amino acid mutation that induced an
elicitor-independent HR on non-transformed N. tabacum
using the Agrobacterium infiltration assay.
In each of the pR-AT39, pR-AT193, pR-AT25, pR-AT32,
pR-AT72 and pR-AT28 clones a single mutation was
196 Abdelhafid Bendahmane et al.
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
responsible for the HR (Figure 2a). In each instance the
timing of the HR was the same with the single amino acid
mutant and the corresponding progenitor clone. The pR-
AT7 clone carried two mutations that were independently
responsible for activation of an HR (Figure 2a). The pR-AT7-
derived recombinants with single amino acid mutations
caused an HR that was slower than with the progenitor
pR-AT7. Presumably the faster HR of the progenitor pR-AT7
was due to an additive effect of the two mutations.
Three out of these eight mutations (F393I, D399V, E400K)
are in an eight amino acid interval close to the RNBS-D
(CFLY) motif that is conserved in R proteins (Hammond-
Kosack and Jones, 1997; Meyers et al., 1999). Two other
mutations led to the same amino acid change (D460V) in the
conserved MHD motif (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1997)
(Figure 2a,b) but are derived independently because, in the
Figure 1. Induction of HR by a constitutive gain-of-function mutant of Rx.(a) Schematic representation of T-DNA constructs for expression of RxcDNA. The cDNA inserts of wild-type or mutant forms of Rx were insertedbetween Rx promoter (pR) and transcriptional terminator (ter). The blackbox indicates the cDNA or either wild-type (wt) Rx cDNA or the cDNA ofmutant (AT) forms of Rx. LB and RB indicate the left and right border of the T-DNA.(b) Expression of wild type Rx and the constitutive gain-of-function mutantpR-AT25 in N. tabacum. The Rx constructs were the wild type Rx (pR-Rx)or the constitutive gain-of-function mutant (pR-AT25). Agrobacterium cul-tures carrying pR-Rx or pR-AT25 was infiltrated into leaves of either-non-transformed (NT) or transgenic N. tabacum (CP) expressing the PVXCP from the 35S promoter. The leaves were photographed 4 days afterinfiltration.
Figure 2. The sequence of the Rx constitutive gain-of-function mutants.(a) Sequence changes responsible for constitutive gain-of-function pheno-types. The diagram shows the changes at the nucleotide and protein levelthat are responsible for the constitutive gain-of-function phenotype.(b) The predicted protein sequence of Rx. The sequence is divided into threedomains corresponding to the amino terminal CC domain, the NBS domainand the LRR. The NBS domain includes the P loop, kinase2 and kinase 3amotifs of the NBS (Aravind et al., 1999) and the RNBS-C, GLPL, RNBS-D andMHD motifs that are conserved in NBS-LRR proteins (Meyers et al., 1999; vander Biezen and Jones, 1998). The residues modified in the constitutive gain-of-function mutants are shown with a black background and the mutantresidues are in bold above the main sequence. The LRR and C terminusregion includes the LRR and the amide rich and acidic tail regions at thecarboxy terminus of Rx (Bendahmane et al., 1999). The LRR consensusmotifs are shown in blue and are aligned. The conserved VLDL motif in LRR3is underlined.
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
Gain of Rx function by mutation and overexpression 197
pR-AT39 and pR-AT193 progenitors, they were associated
with different mutations that did not affect the Rx response
(AB, data not shown). The remaining three constitutive
gain-of-function mutations were in LRR2 (H519R), LRR3
(D543E) and LRR11 (H738R) (Figure 2a,b). The LRR3 muta-
tion is in a motif, VLDL, that is present in LRR3 of many NBS-
LRR R proteins (Axtell et al., 2001; Banerjee et al., 2001) (G.
Farnham, unpublished data).
The Rx gain-of-function phenotype is dependent on a
wild-type P loop motif and on SGT1
In principle the constitutive gain-of-function mutants could
elicit an HR because the encoded proteins are toxic in the
Agrobacterium-infiltrated leaves.Alternatively thesemutant
proteins could have activated the downstream pathway
that is involved in the Rx-mediated response to the PVX
CP. To test these possibilities we introduced alanine sub-
stitutions (G175aþK176A) in the P loop (K1) motif of the
NBS (Aravind et al., 1999) (Figure 2) and assayed the HR
phenotype with the Agrobacterium infiltration assay in non-
transgenic and CP transgenic plants. We predicted that an
HR related to Rx-mediated resistance would depend on in-
tegrity of the conserved P loop, whereas an HR due to toxic
effectsof protein over-expression in the Agrobacterium infil-
tration assay would be unaffected by disruption of the NBS.
As predicted the P loop Rx mutants failed to show an HR
in the infiltrated region of the CP transgenic plants (Figure
3a) indicating that activation of downstream signalling
requires integrity of the NBS. Similarly, when the P loop
mutation was introduced into Rx gain-of-function mutants,
there was no HR in non-transformed N. tabacum leaves.
Identical results were obtained with HA epitope tagged
versions of Rx and the constitutive gain-of-function
mutants. Thus, Rx(HA) was fully functional in an Agrobac-
terium infiltration HR assay in the CP transgenic N. tabacum
and was readily detected by Western blot analysis with HA
antibody in non-transgenic plants (Figure 3b). The P loop
mutants of Rx(HA), D543E(HA) and D460V(HA) were also
non-functional in the HR assay although the encoded pro-
teins were detected by Western analysis (Figure 3b). From
these results we can rule out that the lack of an HR with the P
loop mutants was due to protein destabilization. A more
likely explanation is that the P loop has the same function in
wild type and gain-of-function mutants of Rx. This inter-
pretation is reinforced by our finding (AB, data not shown)
that mutations in residues D244AþD245A (kinase 2) or
G330AþP332A (GLPL) abrogated the ability of both wild-
type and constitutive gain-of-function mutants to produce
an HR in the infiltration assay.
Further indication that the gain-of-function phenotype is
relevant to Rx mediated resistance was based on an HR
assay in N. benthamiana following virus induced gene
silencing (VIGS) of SGT1 loci. SGT1 proteins are required
for many types of disease resistance responses (Austin
et al., 2002; Azevedo et al., 2002) including the HR asso-
ciated with Rx (Figure 3c)(Peart et al., 2002). However
expression of SGT1 loci is not required for cell death
induced by ethanol, sodium azide or sodium chloride (Peart
et al., 2002). Based on these findings we predicted that the
constitutive gain-of-function HR would only be compro-
mised by silencing of SGT1 if it were a bona fide resistance
response. A toxic response would not be compromised by
SGT1 silencing. The HR tests in SGT1 silenced plants were
carried out with D460V and H519RþD543EþH738R in
which three LRR gain-of-function mutations were com-
bined in one construct. The SGT1 silencing was induced
by infection of N. benthamiana with a tobacco rattle virus
vector (Ratcliff et al., 2001) construct carrying an SGT1
cDNA insert.
The results shown in Figure 3(c) show that SGT1 expres-
sion is required for an HR induced by the mutant Rx
proteins. This requirement is not because SGT1 silencing
causes reduced levels of Rx (P. Moffett, unpublished data).
It is likely therefore that the constitutive gain-of-function
phenotype represents Rx-mediated resistance rather than a
toxic response. The SGT1 requirement for other gain-of-
function mutants could not be tested because, for reasons
that we do not understand, they did not produce an elicitor-
independent HR in N. benthamiana unless they accumulate
at very high levels due to co-expression in the presence of a
suppressor of gene silencing (A. Bendahmane, G. Farnham
and P. Moffett unpublished observations). In our hands
virus-induced silencing is much more effective in N.
benthamiana than in N. tabacum (Ana Montserrat Martin
Hernandez, unpublished observations).
Overexpression of Rx
As a second approach to structure-function analysis of Rx
we used the Agrobacterium infiltration assay to over-
express full length and deleted Rx constructs in the absence
of elicitor (Figure 4a). We predicted that overexpression of
the full length Rx in N. tabacum would activate resistance in
the absence of elicitor, as with other NBS-LRR proteins
(Oldroyd and Staskawicz, 1998; Tao et al., 2000). We also
predicted that deletion of domains required for down-
stream signalling would prevent the overexpression phe-
notype. However, deletions in inhibitory domains would
either have no effect or would enhance the overexpression
phenotype. The overexpression constructs all included a
carboxy terminal HA tag so that the level of the Rx proteins
could be monitored by immuno-blotting with HA antibody.
As predicted, expression of full length Rx(HA) under the
strong constitutive 35S RNA promoter of CaMV (Figure 4a)
induced an HR that developed by 72 h post infiltration in the
absence of PVX coat protein. The same protein, either with
or without the HA tag did not induce an HR when expressed
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
198 Abdelhafid Bendahmane et al.
from the genomic Rx promoter (Figure 1b). The level of
Rx(HA) was higher from the 35S construct than with the Rx
promoter (Figure 4b) and we conclude that the HR is caused
by overexpression of Rx.
Overexpression of three deleted versions of Rx(HA)
(382D, 318D and 293D) resulted in an HR that developed
more rapidly (< 48 h) than with the full length protein (72 h).
The 282D protein induced a very slow HR (> 96 h) and the
1D138 amino terminal deletant was inactive. These deleted
proteins were HA tagged but we could not detect the 382D,
318D and 293D proteins in N. tabacum because rapid HR
occurred before they had accumulated to detectable levels.
Figure 3. Constitutive gain-of-function phenotypes require P loop-dependent signalling and SGT1.(a) Rx constructs were infiltrated into N. tabacum that was either non-transgenic or that expressed the PVX CP. Production of an HR was monitored over a periodof 4 days. The Rx constructs were either in a wild-type background or with constitutive gain-of-function mutations E440K, D460V or H519RþD543EþH738R. TheP loop motif in these constructs was either wild type or had GK residues at position 175 and 176 modified to AA (K1). HR indicates an HR within 48 h of infiltrationand ‘-’indicates no HR.(b) Western blot analysis of HA tagged versions of Rx and constitutive gain-of-function mutants with P loop (K1) mutations. The constructs were either the wild-type Rx with an HA tag (RxHA), K1 mutant Rx with an HA tag (RxHAK1) and RxHA constructs with double constitutive gain-of-function and K1 mutations((D543E)K1 and (D460V)K1). The constructs were transiently expressed using Agrobacterium infiltration (O.D.600¼0.2). Samples were taken at 3 days postinfiltration, fractionated by SDS-PAGE and the HA tagged proteins were detected with anti-HA antibody. The HR or ‘-’symbols indicate whether the proteins wereable to mediate an HR within 48 h either in the presence or absence of CP.(c) N. benthamiana plants were infected with TRV:00 or TRV:SGT to silence SGT1 expression. After 21d Agrobacterium infiltration was used to introduce Rxconstructs into the upper infected leaves of the plants either individually or in combination with constructs carrying a 35S CP construct. The PVX constructs wereeither wild type Rx in the presence (1) or absence (2) of CP, D460V (3) or H519RþD543EþH738R (4). The images show that Rx mediated an HR in TRV:00-infectedplants either as a wild-type Rx in the presence of the CP construct or as a constitutive gain-of-function mutant (right leaf) but that SGT1 silencing compromisedthe resistance-associated HR (left leaf).
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
Gain of Rx function by mutation and overexpression 199
However in N. benthamiana none of these proteins induced
an HR and they could be detected at 48 h post infiltration by
western analysis (Figure 4c). All of the deleted forms of Rx
were substantially less abundant than full length Rx.
Based on the assumption that accumulation in N.
benthamiana is indicative of levels in N. tabacum these
results show that HR-inducing activity is enhanced if the
carboxy terminal part of the protein is removed. Thus 382D,
318D and 293D elicited a rapid HR in N. tabacum, despite
their accumulation at a lower level than the full length
protein. This interpretation is consistent with the proposal,
based on the gain-of-function mutant phenotype described
above, that there are negative regulatory functions in Rx
between residues 382 and the carboxy terminus.
The removal of sequence on the amino terminal side of
residue 293 either reduced (282D) or abolished (1D138) HR-
inducing activity, even though these proteins were at least
as abundant as those with a rapid HR phenotype (Figure 4c).
The 282D construct differs from the 293D construct that
elicited a more rapid HR in that it lacks a complete kinase 3
motif and the completely inactive 1D138 is deleted in the CC
domain. It is likely therefore that the CC domain and the
kinase 3 motif of the NBS are essential for downstream
signaling capability of Rx.
Figure 4. Over expression of Rx deletion mu-tants.(a) A scale diagram of Rx showing the CC andLRR regions, as in Figure 2. In the NBS domainthe locations are shown of the P loop(K1), kinase2 kinase 3a and other motifs that are conservedin NBS-LRR proteins including APAF-1 andCED4. The lines indicate the extent of deletionsin HA tagged constructs relative to these con-served motifs. The figures in the right hand sidecolumn indicate the timing of an HR with theseconstructs when transiently expressed from a35S promoter in the absence of CP (NR¼noresponse).(b) Western analysis of RxHA expressed in N.tabacum in an Agrobacterium transient assay(O.D.600 ¼0.2) either from the Rx promoter(pB1)or from the 35S promoter (35S). The Rxconstructs encoded either the wild-type proteinof the P loop (K1) mutants. Protein extracts wereprepared 40 h post-infiltration, prior to the onsetof HR, separated by SDS-PAGE and detected byanti-HA immuno-blotting. An asterisk denotesthat in these samples, five-fold less proteinextract was loaded.(c) Western analysis of RxHA and deletion con-structs expressed in an Agrobacterium transientassay (O.D. 600¼ 0.5)from the 35S promoter ofCaMV in N. benthamiana. Protein extracts fromduplicate experiments were prepared 48 h post-infiltration, separated by SDS-PAGE and de-tected by anti-HA immuno-blotting.
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
200 Abdelhafid Bendahmane et al.
Discussion
Regulatory domains in Rx and other NBS-LRR proteins
In this paper we report two findings related to the function
of Rx and, presumably, other NBS-LRR proteins. First we
describe constitutive gain-of-function mutations in the cen-
tral and carboxy terminal regions of the Rx protein and,
second, we show that an HR induced by overexpression of
Rx can be accelerated by deletion of conserved sequence
motifs in the NBS. We conclude that these Rx phenotypes
are related to signalling rather than recognition because
they involve an elicitor-independent HR.
In one scenario a constitutive gain-of-function mutation
would have fortuitously generated specific structures of Rx
that normally exist only in the presence of elicitor. Alter-
natively, the gain-of-function mutations could have an
indirect effect by, for example, disruption of inhibitory
domains in Rx that prevent signalling in the absence of
elicitor. Formally, from the data presented here, neither
interpretation can be ruled out. However it is unlikely that
random mutagenesis would repeatedly generate new spe-
cific structures involved in downstream signalling. A more
likely scenario is that the mutation has a disruptive effect
and that the constitutive gain-of-function mutations affect
inhibitory domains in Rx. A similar interpretation, invoking
inactivation of inhibitory domains, was used to explain a
constitutive gain-of-function phenotype in a mutant Pto
protein (Rathjen et al., 1999).
Other NBS-LRR proteins that, like Rx, may be subject to
negative regulation include Nod1 in humans. This protein
exhibits enhanced signalling activity when over-expressed
with a deletion in the LRR (Inohara et al., 1999) and it was
concluded that the LRR prevents signalling by amino term-
inal domains. The analysis of the nematode resistance
protein Mi is also consistent with negative regulatory
domains in NBS-LRR proteins. Recombinants of Mi and
an inactive homologue induced an elicitor-independent HR
(Hwang et al., 2000) like the constitutive gain of function Rx
mutants described here. To explain this phenotype, it was
proposed that there are intramolecular interactions in Mi
(Hwang et al., 2000). In the recombinants or, presumably in
the presence of the Mi elicitor, these inhibitory interactions
would be disrupted so that signalling domains would
become exposed and available for interaction with compo-
nents of the downstream pathway.
Conserved sequence motifs in NBS-LRR proteins
Most of the constitutive gain-of-function mutations in Rx
are in or close to sequence motifs that are common to many
NBS-LRR proteins. For example the D543E (Figure 2) muta-
tion is in the VLDL motif that is present in the third LRR of
many NBS-LRR proteins (Axtell et al., 2001) (G. Farnham,
unpublished data) including RPS5 in Arabidopsis. RPS5
encodes an NBS-LRR protein and confers resistance
against Pseudomonas syringae. However a VLDL motif
mutant allele, rps5-1, has a complex phenotype involving
loss of RPS5-mediated resistance and suppression of resis-
tance conferred by other NBS-LRR proteins (Warren et al.,
1998).
To reconcile the interference phenotype of rps5-1 and the
constitutive gain-of-function of D543E we propose that
these mutations both disrupt a negative regulatory domain
in the respective NBS-LRR proteins. Complete inactivation
of this domain, as in D543E, would release the negative
regulation so that the Rx protein could interact with down-
stream components of the signalling pathway and activate
an HR in the absence of elicitor. Partial inactivation of this
domain could allow the NBS-LRR protein to interact with
downstream signalling components but, as may be the
case with rps5-1, without activation of signalling. In that
scenario, if the downstream signalling components are
required by other NBS-LRR proteins, a partial loss-of-func-
tion would interfere with the respective signalling path-
ways.
Other NBS-LRR motifs, including RNBS-D (Meyers et al.,
1999) and MHD (van der Biezen and Jones, 1998) are
implicated in Rx inhibitory domains by constitutive gain-
of-function mutant phenotypes of D399V, E400K and D460V
(Figure 2). The MHD motif had not been targeted previously
in mutational analysis of NBS-LRR proteins (Axtell et al.,
2001; Dinesh-Kumar et al., 2000; Tao et al., 2000; Tornero
et al., 2002) and so the data presented here provide the first
direct analysis of its function.
Other than Rx, the most extensively mutagenised NBS-
LRR protein is RPM1 (Tornero et al., 2002). A total of 53
missense loss-of-function alleles were identified at this
locus of which only one is at or adjacent to the conserved
motifs that were modified in the Rx gain-of-function alleles.
The one exception (rpm1-12) affected the RNBS-D motif
that was modified in the AT72 and AT25 alleles of Rx (Figure
2). However the mutated amino acid in rpm1-12 is not
conserved in Rx and therefore is not directly comparable
with our constitutive gain-of-function alleles. The other
RPM1 mutants, like the gain-of-function mutants of Rx,
were predominantly either within or on the carboxy term-
inal side of the NBS. However, it is not possible to draw
additional conclusions by cross referencing between the
two sets of data because the gain- or loss-of-function
screens would identify different functional domains.
Amino terminal domains
Our constitutive gain-of-function mutants are not directly
informative about signalling domains in Rx. However, since
the HR would require signalling, the phenotypes of the Rx
deletion mutants (1D138, 382D, 318D and 293D; Figure 4) are
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
Gain of Rx function by mutation and overexpression 201
indirectly informative. They indicate, consistent with pre-
vious suggestions (Aarts et al., 1998), that signalling
involves the amino terminal domain in combination with
the P loop, kinase 2 and kinase 3a motifs. It is striking that
none of the constitutive gain-of-function mutations was
within this region of the Rx protein. Perhaps, as suggested
above, random mutagenesis leads primarily to disruption
of functional domains rather than the generation of specific
structures that are required for interaction with compo-
nents of the signalling pathway.
A gain of function analysis of the nematode resistance
gene Mi led to the conclusion that the amino terminal
domain was a regulator of signalling mediated by the
LRR. This interpretation differs from that made here about
Rx and it may be that activation of Mi- and Rx-mediated
resistance involves different mechanisms. However, if as
seems likely, the NBS-LRR domains have multiple functions
in recognition, activation and response signalling these two
sets of data are not necessarily incompatible. The artificial
Mi recombinants would have been informative about some
but not all of these functions. Similarly the Rx point mutants
would have provided information about a different set of
functions. For more complete understanding of recognition
and response in disease resistance, it will be necessary to
generate high resolution secondary and tertiary structures
of Rx and other NBS-LRR proteins and their elicitors.
Experimental procedures
Rx constructs
pB1 is a modified pBIN19 plasmid (Bevan, 1984) that carries atranscription cassette comprising 3 kb of the Rx promoter and a1.5-kb Rx terminator separated by an XbaI and a SacI cloning sites(Bendahmane et al., 2000). All Rx derivative mutants were clonedbetween the XbaI and the SacI cloning sites. All constructs weresequenced to confirm the absence of PCR-derived mutations.To construct pR-Rx, Rx cDNA was PCR amplified and the PCRproduct was cloned into the XbaI and SacI sites of pB1 to createpR-Rx.
The 35S promoter constructs were all in the pBIN61 binaryvector. pBIN61 is a modified pBIN19 binary vector that carries atranscription cassette comprising the CaMV 35S promoter andterminator. To construct the pBIN61 binary vector, the transcrip-tion cassette containing the CaMV 35S promoter and terminatorwas released by digestion with KpnI and XhoI from the plasmidpJIT61 (kindly provided by P. Mullineaux, JIC, Norwich, UK). Thetranscription cassette was then ligated to the pBIN19 plasmidvector digested with KpnI and SalI to create pBIN61. To construct35S-Rx, Rx cDNA was PCR amplified and cloned into the XbaI andSmaI sites of pBIN61.
RxHA was constructed via PCR, using a primer that introduced aBamHI site at the extreme carboxyl terminus of the Rx openreading frame followed by the HA epitope tag. Similarly thetruncated constructs were generated by PCR from the Rx cDNAwith 30 primers introducing a BamHI site. The PCR products werecloned into the Xba1/BamH1 sites of PBin61-RxHA and subse-quently tranferred to pB1.
Full details of all constructs are available on request and bio-materials are available through our website (http://www.sains-bury-laboratory.ac.uk).
PCR mutagenesis
Random mutagenesis of the Rx gene was performed under con-ditions similar to those previously described (Shafikhani et al.,1997). The PCR was carried out using the primers RxP1 and Rxac4,which flank the Rx ORF. The PCR reaction contained (100 ml finalvolume) 10 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 0.05% Nonidet P-40, 7 mM
MgCl2, 0.15 mM MnCl2, 0.2 mM dGTP, 0.2 mM dATP, 1 mM dCTP,1 mM dTTP, 0.3 mM of both primers, 50 ng of template and 5 U TaqDNApolymerase(Gibco-BRL).PCRwasperformedfor35cycles:15 sat 948C, 15 s at 558C, and 2 min at 728C. The PCR products weredigested with XbaI and SacI, gel purified and cloned in the binaryvector pB1 in E. coli. Plasmid DNA was purified from 10000 coloniesand electroporated into A. tumefaciens strain C58C1 carrying thevirulence helper plasmid pCH32 (Hamilton et al., 1996).
Site-directed mutagenesis
Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis was used to introduce spe-cific mutations into the Rx cDNA or into the mutants E400K, D460Vand D543EþH738R. The site directed mutations were confirmedby sequence analysis. The mutations of the P loop were at Rxcodon 175 from GGG(G) to GCG(A) and at codon 176 from AAA(K)to GCA(A). The mutations of the kinase Za motif were at Rx codon244 from GAT(D) to GCT(A) and at codon 245 from GAC(D) toGCC(A). The mutations of the GLPL motif were at codons 330 fromGGA(G) to GCA(A) and 332 from CCT(P) to GCT(A).
Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression
Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression was performedunder conditions similar to those described previously (Bendah-mane et al., 1999). The binary Ti-plasmid vector constructs weretransformed into A. tumefaciens strain C58C1 carrying the viru-lence helper plasmid pCH32 (Hamilton et al., 1996). The transfor-mants were inoculated into 5 ml L-broth medium supplementedwith 50 mg ml-1 kanamycin and 5 mg ml-1 tetracycline and grown at288C overnight. Cells were precipitated and resuspended to the ODof 0.5 in solution containing 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES pH 5.6 and150 mM acetosyringone. The cells were left at room temperature onthe bench for 2 h before infiltration into N. tabacum leaves. Theinfiltrations were either into-non-transformed N. tabacum or intotransgenic N. tabacum expressing the PVX CP (Spillane et al.,1997). The transient expression was more efficient in the first trueleaf of young N. tabacum seedlings.
DNA sequencing and analysis
The sequencing reactions were performed using a dye terminatorcycle sequencing reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer, Cambridge, UK).Sequence reactions were resolved on ABI377 automated sequen-cer (Applied Biosystems ABI, La Jolla, CA, USA). Sequence contigswere assembled using UNIX versions of the Staden programspackage (Staden, 1996).
Immunodetection
To prepare protein samples, two leaf discs (approximately 35 mg)were ground in 150 ml of 8 M urea, followed by addition of 75 ml of
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
202 Abdelhafid Bendahmane et al.
3X SDS loading buffer and boiling for 10 min Fifty ml of proteinextract was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE followed by transfer toImmun-blot PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, Hemel Hempstead, UK).Membranes were incubated successively in 5% skim milk powderin TBST (25 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20),0.1 ng ml�1 of 3F10 anti-HA antibody (Roche, Lewes, UK) andfinally with goat anti rat HRP conjugate (Sigma, Poole, UK). Pro-teins were visualised using the chemiluminesence kit ECL Plus(Pharmacia, Little Chalfont, UK).
Virus induced gene silencing (VIGS)
VIGS of the N. benthamiana homologue of SGT1 using a tobaccorattle virus vector (Ratcliff et al., 2001) has been described else-where (Peart et al., 2002). The procedures involved inoculation of14-day-old N. benthamiana plants with TRV vectors either withoutan insert (TRV:00) or carrying an N. benthamiana SGT1 insert(TRV:SGT). The ability of these infected plants to support an Rx-mediated HR was then tested after a further 14–21 days in theleaves that were systemically infected with TRV.
Acknowledgements
We thank Erik Van der Biezen for comments on the manuscript.The work was supported by the Gatsby Charitable Foundation andthe Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. P.Moffett is supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship. Recombi-nant viruses and transgenic plants were contained in greenhousesunder DEFRA license PHL 161/4080.
References
Aarts, N., Metz, M., Holub, E., Staskawicz, B.J., Daniels, M.J. andParker, J.E. (1998) Different requirements for EDS1 and NDR1 bydisease resistance genes define at least two R. gene-mediatedsignaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA,95, 10306–10311.
Aravind, L., Dixit, V.M. and Koonin, E.V. (1999) The domains ofdeath: evolution of the apoptosis machinery. Trends Biochem.Sci. 24, 47–53.
Austin, M.J., Muskett, P., Kahn, K., Feys, B.J., Jones, J.D.G. andParker, J.E. (2002) Regulatory role of SGT1. early R. gene-mediated plant defenses. Science, 295, 2077–2080.
Axtell, M.J., McNellis, T.W., Mudgett, M.B., Hsu, C.S. and Staska-wicz, B.J. (2001) Mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis RPS2disease resistance gene and the corresponding Pseudomonassyringae avrRpt2 avirulence gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.14, 181–188.
Azevedo, C., Sadanandom, A., Kitagawa, K., Freialdenhoven, A.,Shirasu, K. and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2002) The RAR1 interactorSGT1, an essential component of R. gene-triggered diseaseresistance. Science, 295, 2073–2076.
Banerjee, D., Zhang, X.C. and Bent, A.F. (2001) The leucine-richrepeat domain can determine effective interaction betweenRPS2 and other host factors in Arabidopsis RPS2-mediateddisease resistance. Genetics, 158, 439–450.
Bendahmane, A., Kanyuka, K. and Baulcombe, D.C. (1999) The Rxgene from potato controls separate virus resistance and celldeath responses. Plant Cell, 11, 781–791.
Bendahmane, A., Kohm, B.A., Dedi, C. and Baulcombe, D.C. (1995)The coat protein of potato virus X is a strain-specific elicitor ofRx1-mediated virus resistance in potato. Plant J. 8, 933–941.
Bendahmane, A., Querci, M., Kanyuka, K. and Baulcombe, D.C.(2000) Agrobacterium transient expression system as a tool forisolation of disease resistance genes: application to the Rx2locus in potato. Plant J. 21, 73–81.
Bevan, M.W. (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant trans-formation. Nucl Acids Res. 12, 8711–8721.
van der Biezen, E.A. and Jones, J.D.G. (1998) The NB-ARC domain:a novel signalling motif shared by plant resistance geneproducts and regulators of cell death in animals. Curr. Biol. 8,226–227.
Cockerham, G. (1970) Genetical studies on resistance to potatoviruses X and Y. Heredity, 25, 309–348.
Dinesh-Kumar, S.P., Tham, W.H. and Baker, B.J. (2000) Structure-function analysis of the tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 14789–14794.
Ellis, J., Dodds, P. and Pryor, T. (2000) Structure, function andevolution of plant disease resistance genes. Curr. Opin. Plant.Biol. 3, 278–284.
Ellis, J.G., Lawrence, G.J., Luck, J.E. and Dodds, P.N. (1999)Identification of regions in alleles of the flax rust resistance geneL that determine differences in gene-for-gene specificity. PlantCell, 11, 495–506.
Hamilton, C.M., Frary, A., Lewis, C. and Tanksley, S.D. (1996)Stable transfer of intact high molecular weight DNA into plantchromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 9975–9979.
Hammond-Kosack, K.E. and Jones, J.D.G. (1997) Plant diseaseresistance genes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48, 575–607.
Hu, Y., Benedict, M., Ding, L. and Nunez, G. (1999) Role of cyto-chrome c and dATP/ATP hydrolysis in Apaf-1-mediated caspase-9 activation and apoptosis. EMBO J. 18, 3586–3595.
Hwang, C.-F., Bhakta, A.V., Truesdell, G.M., Waclawa, M.P. andWilliamson, V.M. (2000) Evidence for a role of the N terminusand leucine-rich repeat region of the Mi gene product in regula-tion of localized cell death. Plant Cell, 12, 1319–1329.
Inohara, N., Koseki, T., del Peso, L., Hu, Y.M., Yee, C., Chen, S.,Carrio, R., Merino, J., Liu, D., Ni, J. and Nunez, G. (1999) Nod1, anApaf-1-like activator of caspase-9 and nuclear factor- kappa B. J.Biol. Chem. 274, 14560–14567.
Luck, J.E., Lawrence, G.J., Dodds, P., Shepherd, K.W. and Ellis,J.G. (2000) Regions outside of the leucine-rich repeats of flaxrust resistance proteins play a role in specificity determination.Plant Cell, 12, 1367–1377.
McDowell, J.M., Cuzick, A., Can, C., Beynon, J., Dangl, J.L. andHolub, E.B. (2000) Downy mildew (Perenospora prasitica) resis-tance genes in Arabidopsis vary in functional requirements forNDR1, EDS1, NPR1 and salicylic acid accumulation. Plant J. 22,523–529.
Meyers, B.C., Dickerman, A.W., Michelmore, R.W., Sivaramakrish-nan, S., Sobral, B.W. and Young, N.D. (1999) Plant diseaseresistance genes encode members of an ancient and diverseprotein family within the nucleotide-binding superfamily. PlantJ. 20, 317–332.
Meyers, B.C., Shen, K.A., Rohani, P., Gaut, B.S. and Michelmore,R.W. (1998) Receptor-like genes in the major resistance locusof lettuce are subject to divergent selection. Plant Cell, 10,1833–1846.
Noel, L., Moores, T.L., van der Biezen, E.A., Parniske, M., Daniels,M.J., Parker, J.E. and Jones, J.D.G. (1999) Pronounced intras-pecific haplotype divergence at the RPP5 complex disease resis-tance locus of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 11, 2099–2111.
Oldroyd, G.E.D. and Staskawicz, B.J. (1998) Genetically engi-neered broad-spectrum disease resistance in tomato. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA, 95, 10300–10305.
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
Gain of Rx function by mutation and overexpression 203
Peart, J.R., Lui, R., Sadanandom, A. et al. (2002) The ubiquitinligase-associated protein SGT1 is required for host and nonhostdisease resistance in plants. Proceedings of the Natl Acad. Sci.USA, 99, 10865–10869.
Ratcliff, F., Martin-Hernandez, A.M. and Baulcombe, D.C. (2001)Tobacco rattle virus as a vector for analysis of gene function bysilencing. Plant J. 25, 237–245.
Rathjen, J.P., Chang, J.H., Staskawicz, B.J. and Michelmore, R.W.(1999) Constitutively active Pto induces a Prf-dependent hyper-sensitive response in the absence of avrPto. EMBO J. 18, 3232–3240.
Shafikhani, S., Siegel, R.A., Ferrari, E. and Schellenberger, V.(1997) Generation of large libraries of random mutants in Bacil-lus subtilis by PCR-based plasmid multimerization. Biotechni-ques, 23, 304–310.
Shirasu, K. and Schulze-Lefert, P. (2000) Regulators of cell death indisease resistance. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 371–385.
Spillane, C., Verchot, J., Kavanagh, T.A. and Baulcombe, D.C.(1997) Concurrent suppression of virus replication and rescue
of movement-defective virus in transgenic plants expressing thecoat protein of potato virus X. Virology, 236, 76–84.
Staden, R. (1996) The Staden sequence analysis package. MolBiotechnol. 5, 233–241.
Sun, Q., Collins, N.C., Ayliffe, M., Smith, S.M., Drake, J., Pryor, T.and Hulbert, S.H. (2001) Recombination between paralogues atthe rp1 rust resistance locus in maize. Genetics, 158, 423–438.
Tao, Y., Yuan, F.H., Leister, R.T., Ausubel, F.M. and Katagiri, F.(2000) Mutational analysis of the Arabidopsis nucleotide bindingsite- leucine-rich repeat resistance gene RPS2. Plant Cell, 12,2541–2554.
Tornero, P., Chao, R.A., Luthin, W.N., Goff, S.A. and Dangl, J.(2002) Large-scale structure-function analysis of the ArabidopsisRPM1 disease resistance protein. Plant Cell, 14, 435–450.
Warren, R.F., Henk, A., Mowery, P., Holub, E. and Innes, R.W.(1998) A mutation within the leucine-rich repeat domain ofthe arabidopsis disease resistance gene RPS5 partially sup-presses multiple bacterial and downy mildew resistance genes.Plant Cell, 10, 1439–1452.
� Blackwell Publishing Ltd, The Plant Journal, (2002), 32, 195–204
204 Abdelhafid Bendahmane et al.