Consolidation Trends in Government A Review of Current ...
Transcript of Consolidation Trends in Government A Review of Current ...
Consolidation Trends in GovernmentA Review of Current Initiatives
Robert L. WomackDirector, State and Local Government
April 26, 2005
Why Consolidate?Selected Case Studies
3 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Why Consider Consolidation?“Texas state government currently offers an insufficient level of shared IT infrastructure for agencies to leverage. When a business need arises, agencies fill the gap with independent solutions, resulting in overlapping and redundant technology assets. The potential for multi-agency solutions that effectively respond to those business needs is lost.Through targeted and realistic consolidation of commodity IT services and resources, the state can develop a shared technology infrastructure that maximizes its investment in three distinct areas:
- Increased Cost Effectiveness – The state can spread the cost of service over multiple agencies, fully leveraging the state’s purchasing power.
- Improved Service Delivery – A shared IT infrastructure allows for development of deeper IT skills and provides better services and lower cost to the end user
- Greater Focus on Core Missions – When agencies are relieved of the burden of managing tactical IT issues, they will be better positioned to quickly act on opportunities that directly accelerate the agency mission and service to citizens.”
Source: A Foundation for Change: Leveraging a Statewide Technology Infrastructure, Texas Department of Information Resources (DIR), May 28, 2004, p. 1.
4 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Cross-Sector TrendsBusiness decision makers demanding IT transparency
- Spending accountability- Mapping IT initiatives to business initiatives- A better way of allocating IT costs to Business Units
Insource/outsource analysis for all IT services- Service cost benchmarking
Changing industry regulations- Business Software Alliance (BSA)- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Increased recognition of IT’s criticality to the business- Increased responsiveness- Consistent service-level delivery
Increased utility computing offerings from vendorsAdoption of IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) best practices
5 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Federal Consolidation InitiativesIn June 1998, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) awarded seat management contracts to seven prime contractors under its Outsourcing Desktop Initiative for NASA (ODIN) government wide contract. In July of that same year, the GeneralServices Administration (GSA) awarded contracts to eight prime vendors under its own government wide seat management contract.As reported in a 2002 General Accounting Office (GAO) report [4] on desktop outsourcing, the six agencies that had implemented seat management under these contracts reported that the use of seat management contracts allowed them to:
- Improve information technology management by standardizing hardware and software;
- Improve end user support;- Enhance mission support by freeing up staff time that was previously
dedicated to desktop management functions; and- Upgrade their desktop technology on a more timely basis.
6 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
California’s IT Consolidation - Goals
More efficient, standardized systems capable of supporting multiple agencies;Reduced redundancy and variation within the state’s technology infrastructure;Reduction in cost for common infrastructure services;Enhanced ability for data sharing;Improved ability to successfully leveraged IT procurements;Enhanced security and privacy measures for the storage and distribution of electronic data;Improved core technology support for all state agencies and departments; andMore effective utilization and management of technology personnel.
7 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
California’s IT Consolidation - Specifics
Proposed (March, 2005) creation of a Department of Technology Services (DTS) to manage:
- the state’s consolidated general purpose data center- consolidated voice and data network operations.
Proposed DTS Organization- Division of Engineering- Division of Operations- Division of Business Development- Division of Administration- Division of Security- Office of Network Services
8 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Other California Consolidation Initiatives
The California Performance Review (CPR) that was completed in August 2004 includes recommendations for several initiatives related to consolidation of IT support services. In recommendation SO31 the CPR recommends that state agencies move to “virtual desktops” as a means of saving money on PC client hardware and support services. The virtual desktop solution would provide Internet browser-based access to applications that run on server computers, thus reducing the total cost of ownership for each virtual seat managed desktop from about $5,000/year to $1,000/year.
9 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Other Consolidation Initiatives
In addition to the recommendation to move to a virtual desktop, the CPR recommended in SO/30 that a statewide information technology Help Desk be created. Other states like New York, Florida and Wisconsin have used statewide help desks as a means of consolidating some IT services. In June 2001 the New York Office of Technology created a help desk to provide services to 4 state agencies and a number of local government agencies, educational institutions and not-for-profit organizations.
10 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Texas’ “Foundation” VisionInfrastructure components under consideration for
consolidation under Texas’ “Foundation” Vision
3. Enterprise Applications
A. Messaging and
Collaboration
B. Financial Systems
1. Data Center Consolidation
A. Facilities
B. Mainframes
C. Servers
D. Storage
2. Statewide Network
A. Network Systems
B. Network Circuits and Equipment
C. New Network Technologies
4. IT Support Services
A. User Support
B. Processes and
Procedures
Source: A Foundation for Change: Leveraging a State Technology Infrastructure, State of Texas DIR, May 28, 2004.
11 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Foundation Savings Areas
Initiative Initiative Name Savings Results Savings Potential Complexity Timeframe
1A DCC - Facilities $74 Excellent Average Medium
1B DCC - Mainframes $32 Good Difficult Long
1C DCC - Servers $196 Excellent Difficult Medium
1D DCC - Storage $37 Superior Average Short
2A Network $29 Good Basic Short
2B Network Circuits and Equipment $29 Good Basic Medium
2C New Network Technologies $235 Good Average Medium
3A Messaging and Collaboration Systems $7 Good Basic Short
3B Financial Systems $38 Good Difficult Long
4A User Support $85 Excellent Difficult Long
4B Processes and Procedures ?? Good Basic Short
12 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
The Transformation in IT
HIGH
Remove Waste, Reclaim Capacity, Manage Demand
Consolidation / Standardization
Capacity Dynamically Sourced
Virtualization and Provisioning
Management as a discipline
Asset optimization
Service-oriented architectures
Tran
sfor
mat
ion
Tran
sfor
mat
ion
LOW
Today 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Today 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
13 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Today’s Challenges with IT
Too much complexityLots of laborUnder-utilized capitalVulnerable infrastructureHard to set service levelsUn-gated demand
Inefficient, Unresponsive, Unaligned
Consolidation Value Proposition
14 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Reduce cost- Asset optimization- Operating costs- Capital expense
Manage risk- Security- Data - Corporate compliance and IT governance
Ensure infrastructure is always on, never seen
Cost
Risk
Availability
50%
.001%
99.999%
15 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Reduce Cost: Operating CostsCustomer Results
JPMorgan Retirement Plan Services
Save $3M annually due to business process automation
Intelligent Finance (Halifax plc)Save over $3M annually due to application life cycle change management
Sallie MaeOver 300% increase in PC admin productivity in 2 years
81% of IT Spending is Non-Discretionary
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
IT Budget Allocation
Source: Gartner, “Management Update: Enterprises Should Assess How Their IT Spending Stacks Up,” Barbara Gomolski, Aug 2003.
Maintenance and AdminStrategic Projects
Shift investment towards strategic projects
16 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Industry
Avg. IT Capital
Budget % of Revenue
Avg. IT Capital Budget
Communications 2.67 48,300,054
1,902,155
6,894,688
242,470
16,952,752
31,510,743
8,792,565
5,624,114
Petroleum 0.86 63,493,014
Services 1.23 4,165,879
Transportation 0.7 1,618,624
Utilities 0.81 9,338,984
All Industries 1.25 19,453,198
Retail 0.63
Wholesale 0.93
Education 0.96
Financial Services 1.65
Government 1.65
Healthcare 1.61
Manufacturing (Discrete) 0.68
Reduce Cost: Capital ExpenseCustomer Results
AliantReclaimed 73% of storage capacity
Fortune 50 Global Financial Services Firm
Saved $6.7M in 2 years due to better IT asset management
Source: Gartner 2003 IT Spending and Staffing Survey Results, Oct 2003.
Reducing capital expense by 10% saves $6 million over 3 years
17 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Manage Risk: SecuritySecurity Incidents Have
Reached an All-Time High(number of security incidents
as reported to CERT/CC)
Source: Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute / CERT Coordination Center 2004 (website).
Customer Results
MSFT TechEd 2004Zero viruses, zero successful intrusions, and 99.92% network up-time despite over 98,000 intrusion attempts
Walter ReedSaved $1.8M over 3 years by automatically identifying vulnerable IT assets and deploying security patches
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
18 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Manage Risk: DataData Growth Exceeds Management Capacity
Customer Results
Arizona ElectricCut backup time by 50% while volume of data under management grew by 100%
Southern WineZero storage-related downtime in past year
Data grows 50-70% annuallyStorage admin capabilities improve 20-30% annually
Backup/Recovery Failures Common
5-20% B/R jobs fail nightlyAddressing B/R failures consumes 2/3 of storage management resources
Source: META Group, “Proactive Data Protection: The Best Defense Is a Good Offense,” Phil Goodwin, Apr 2004. The Storage Manifesto, Fred Moore, 2002.
Ensure Infrastructure Availability
19 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Industry Sector Revenue/Hour
Energy $2,817,846
Telecommunications $2,066,245
Manufacturing $1,610,645
Financial Institutions $1,495,134
Information Technology $1,344,461
Insurance $1,202,444
Retail $1,107,274
Pharmaceuticals $1,082,252
Banking $996,802
Food/Beverage Processing $804,192
Consumer Products $785,719
Chemicals $704,101
Transportation $668,586
Utilities $643,250
Healthcare $636,030
Electronics $477,366
Multi-Industry Average $1,010,536Source: META Group, “How Safe Is the Business? Perception/Reality Disconnect,” Rob Schafer, Feb 02.
Potential Revenue Loss Due to DowntimeCustomer Results
Sol Meliá (world’s largest resort chain)
200% increase in online sales due to highly available web-based system
Dexia-Banque International de Luxembourg
250% performance increase with 99.8% uptime
Large Global Mining / Manufacturing Company
Saved $3.7M in one year due to avoided system downtime
One day of down time costs $24 million
A Theoretical Basis for Shared Services
IT “On-Demand”
21 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
The ITIL Process Model
Business, Customers, Users
IncidentManagement
ProblemManagement
ChangeManagement
ServiceDesk
ReleaseManagement
ConfigurationManagement
SecurityManagement
Service LevelManagement
AvailabilityManagement
CapacityManagement
FinancialManagement
IT ServiceContinuity
ManagementService DeliveryService Support
22 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
“On-Demand” Computing Maturity Model
Manual and fragmented management across infrastructure components
Manual and fragmented management across infrastructure components
4 - Business-Driven
1 - Active2 - Efficient
3 - Responsive
Automated but fragmented management systems
Integrated management systems; ability to manage by fact
IT managed as a business; capacity sourced dynamically
- Monitor- Self-Service
- Measure Usage- Financial Mgmt.- Chargeback
- Define- Commit- Monitor
- Deliver - Support
23 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Level One — Active Management
In level one, IT management is largely piecemeal and manual across various applications and infrastructure components. IT reacts to problems, but is largely unable to proactively prevent them. Organizations in level one should focus on the following capabilities to advance their maturity:
- Standardize IT management processes- Integrate management functionality across silos- Automate system monitoring and management.
24 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Level Two — Efficient ManagementIn level two, data capture and analysis capabilities reach across the enterprise. Root cause analysis enables fast problem identification. However, automated system responses are not enabled and workflows are not defined — thus, problem fixes and changes must still be executed manually.Organizations in level two should focus on the following capabilities to advance their maturity:
- Automate problem resolution and define workflows for automated system actions- Implement technologies to automatically map IT to the business- Implement virtualization and provisioning functionality to enable resource-sharing- Automate metering and measurement of IT usage to support chargeback.
25 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Level Three — Responsive ManagementIn level three, system actions are automated. Workflows for problem fixes and changes are defined throughout the IT infrastructure. However, administrative approval is required to initiate any action.Organizations in level three should focus on the following capabilities to advance their maturity:
- Fully automate all IT processes based on business policies- Address organizational alignment supporting IT automation- Financially and strategically optimize use of IT for business advantage.
26 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Level Four — Business-Driven ManagementIn level four, automated actions and problem fixes are initiated without human intervention, based on business policies and SLAs. Infrastructure management is fully automated, self-healing and self-managing. Reporting tracks system responses for informational and analytical purposes, and people are involved only at the policy setting level.Level four is characterized by several organizational and technological changes:
- Policies impacting management of the IT infrastructure are set by the business staff, not the IT staff
- Costs of the IT services required by all business processes are fully understood and transparent
- The IT infrastructure has complete self-monitoring capabilities, including policy auditing
- Resources are shared automatically among all areas of the organization (IT silos now extinct)
- Integrated management of all aspects of the IT infrastructure is achieved through standards-based, open solutions.
IT Service Management and Shared Services
28 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Asset Repository: Job 1
Centrally manage all management information- Discover and inventory all hardware, all
software- Administer people (users, rights,
privileges)- Define and manage policies- Map assets to business processes- … and a whole lot more
29 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Asset Optimization – Solving Business Problems
The benefits of asset optimization are large:- Ensuring software license compliance- Contract and lease management- Procurement optimization- Asset retirement- Vendor auditing and risk management- Correct allocation of assets
And once you know what you own, you can manage it by:- Improving operational efficiencies- Proving data protection- Securing it- Understanding its life cycle- Setting service levels and financial controls
30 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
IT Service ManagementManage IT Like a BusinessService support and delivery
- Help desks and knowledge bases- Service catalogs
Manage by business process- Auto discovery and correlation- Service-level management
Define, monitor, measure
Financial administration of IT- Budget and planning- Cost allocation and reconciliation- Billing and chargeback- Integrated into ERP
31 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
IT Service Management – The Result
IT Service Management lets you manage IT like a business
Companies today take cost divided by employees!!!
32 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Intelligence
Do you know?How many assets you have?License exposure / audit risk?What databases are not backed up?Underutilized storage?Consolidation opportunity?What assets are vulnerable?Risks based on a business process?Machines that have the most incidents?And a whole lot more …
Intelligence ProductsAsset IntelligenceService IntelligenceStorage IntelligenceLife Cycle IntelligenceNetwork IntelligenceMainframe Systems Intelligence
33 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Asset Intelligence
34 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Summary
Consolidation initiatives a response to both IT costs and perceived lack of alignment with enterprise goals.IT planners benefit greatly by considering the ITIL framework inthinking through the “how” of IT consolidation.Given continuing demands for driving efficiencies in government through both use of IT and reduction in IT costs, consolidation and similar initiatives will be a continuing theme across the states.
35 © 2004 Computer Associates International, Inc. (CA). All trademarks, trade names, services marks and logos referenced herein belong to their respective companies.
Contacts
Contacts for more information:- Erin Sullivan
VP, State and Local Government – 908-531-0128
- Matt MullinixAccount Director, Comm. of Kentucky – 317-705-9291
- Bob WomackBusiness Development Director – HLS – 617-733-5741