Consolidated Local Govt

download Consolidated Local Govt

of 46

Transcript of Consolidated Local Govt

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    1/46

    Review:Local Government Law

    AlbertoC.Agra

    ProfessorofLaws,AteneoLawSchool

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    2/46

    Flow

    1. Nature of Local Governments2. Local Autonomy3. Powers of LGUs (Police Power; EminentDomain)4. Fiscal Autonomy (Power to Tax; IRA;

    Other Sources)5. Local Legislation6. Public Accountability

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    3/46

    1. Nature of LGUs

    Ours is still a unitary form ofgovernment, not a federal state.

    LGUs are Territorial and PoliticalSubdivisions

    Not Imperium in Imperio, NotIndependent Sub-National Units

    5 Levels/ Kinds (Autonomous Regions,Provinces, Cities, Municipalities andBarangays)

    LGUs are Municipal Corporation Proper;Administrative Agencies

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    4/46

    1. Nature of LGUs

    LGU Dual Capacities: Governmental/Public and Proprietary/ Private

    Dual Agency: LGUs as Agentsof theState and People

    Sources of Powers: Constitution Lawand Charter (No Inherent Powers)

    Legislative Separation of Powers Corporate Succession (Contractual

    Obligations)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    5/46

    1. Nature of LGUs

    Creation Legislative Act: Charter (Not by Executive unless

    State Recognition and No Judicial Dissolution);Authority to set requirements for certain local

    governments Criteria: Population, Land Area and (or) Income

    (internal or external) Distinct Personality: Municipality to a City

    Failure to identify Seat of Government not fatal Plebiscite (directly affected; upgrade anddowngrade; boundary disputes prejudicial question;plebiscite protest cases Comelec)

    Assail Existence: Quo Warranto (5 years)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    6/46

    1. Nature of LGUs

    P/C/M/B ARMM CAR MMDA

    LGU LGU Admin Agency Admin Agency

    AdminAutonomy

    PoliticalAutonomy

    Not EnjoyAutonomy

    Not EnjoyAutonomy

    Police &Legislative

    Power

    Police &Legislative

    Power

    No PolicePower; No

    Legislative

    No PolicePower; No

    LegislativePresidential

    Supervision

    Presidential

    Supervision

    Presidential

    Control

    Presidential

    Control

    Amend by Law Amend by Law

    + Plebiscite

    Amend by

    Pres./ Law

    Amend by Law

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    7/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    means a more responsive and accountable localgovernment structure instituted through a system ofdecentralization

    does not contemplate making mini-states out ofLGUs

    LGUs xxx form part of the whole. Regional autonomy is the degree of self-

    determination exercised by the LGU vis--vis the centralgovernment.

    Autonomy is either decentralization of administrationor decentralization of power.

    Decentralization comes in two forms:deconcentration and devolution.

    Decentralization simply means the devolution ofnational administration, not power, to LGUs.

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    8/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    AdministrativeDecentralization

    PoliticalDecentralization

    Deconcentration Devolution

    Transfer of Functions:National to Regional

    Transfer of Powers:Central to Local

    Administrative Powers, Responsibilitiesand Resources

    LGC: Section 528 LGC: Section 17

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    9/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Decentralization ofAdministration

    Decentralization of Power

    Delegation of AdministrativePowers Regulatory Powers

    and Basic Services

    Abdication of Political Power

    Relieves State from Burden ofManaging Local Affairs

    Free to Chart own Destiny

    Executive Supervision Executive Supervision Minimal

    State InterventionAccountability to

    Central GovernmentAccountability to the

    Constituency; Self-Immolation

    Provinces, Cities,

    Municipalities and Barangays

    Autonomous Regions

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    10/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Areas Delegation Devolution

    What istransferred?

    State Powers Power of NGA

    Basis ofTransfer

    Law; Congress Congress (orPresident)

    Effectivity of

    Transfer

    Immediate; law

    effectivity

    NGA facilitates

    actual transferExamples 3 Fundamental

    PowersDSWD; DENR;HLURB; LTFRB

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    11/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Congress retains control of the localgovernment units although in significantly reduceddegree xxx

    The Constitution confines the President's powerover the LGUs to one ofgeneral supervision.This provision has been interpreted to exclude thepower of control.

    The President can only interfere in the affairs andactivities of a local government unit if he or she

    finds that the latter has acted contrary to law.

    The matter being peculiarly local in nature, themunicipal council alone is in a better positionxxx (Principle of Subsidiarity; Municipal DimensionRule)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    12/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Executive Supervision: Overseeing Ensure that supervised unit

    follows law/ rules Allows interference if

    supervised unit actedcontrary to law

    Over actor and act There must be a law (Yes -

    DOJ, DBM; None - DILG,

    DENR) Only involves questions of

    law (declare legal or illegal)

    Control: Lays down rules in doing of

    an act Impose limitations when

    there is none imposed by

    law Decide for subordinate or

    change decision Alter wisdom, law-

    conforming judgment or

    exercise of discretion Discretion to order actundone or re-done

    Prescribe manner by whichact is done

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    13/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Executive Supervision

    1. Review of Orders andOrdinances

    2. Disciplinary Action3. Integration of Plans/

    Zoning

    4. Boundary Disputes5.

    Leaves/ Resignation/Vacancies

    6. Augmentation of BasicServices

    Legislative Control

    1. Structure2. Elective and

    Appointive Officials

    3. Powers4. Qualifications5. Manner of Selection6. Taxes7. IRA/ National Wealth8. Creation

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    14/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    Paradoxically, local governments are still subject toregulation, however limited, for the purpose ofenhancing self-government.

    National concern cannot be subjected tofragmented concepts of management policieswhere xxx local government units exercise exclusivedominion over specific portions xxx (NationalDimension Rule; Integration/ Centralization)

    The Local Government Code xxx directs executiveofficials and employees of the municipality tofaithfully discharge their duties and functions asprovided by law.

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    15/46

    2. Local Autonomy(Conflict Resolution)

    LGU Triumphed vs. DENR (ordinance) DBM (allowance, budget

    officer) COA (RATA) DENR (oil depots)

    DOJ (tax ordinance) Higher LGU (review) DAR (reclassify, expropriation) DILG (barangay liga) OP (IRA) DOF (RPC/ LGC) BOI (6-year exemption) MMDA (subdivision, driverslicenses, natl dumpsite;

    terminals; review ordinances) NAPOCOR (voltage cables) DSWD (devolved personnel) Congress (IRA, amend Organic

    Act)

    National Victorious vs. LGUs DENR (forestry laws) LTO/ LTFRB (licensing) HLURB (national projects) COA (additional allowance)

    NTC (cable TV franchise) DAR (conversion) GAB (jai alai frontons) LLDA (fishpens, dumpsite) BCDA (creation of Zone) PAGCOR (casinos)

    PCSO (lotto outlets) PRC (profession) LWUA (water districts) DPWH (city engineer) CSC (dismissal) OP (discipline) Congress (jai alai franchise)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    16/46

    2. Local Autonomy

    In favor of NGA/ GOCC if: Integration Centralization Avoid fragmentation

    Mandate exclusive underCharter/ law Implied repeals not favored Instrumentalities of the

    State National or cross-boundary

    concerns are bestaddressed by NGAs/ GOCCs

    National Dimension Rule

    In favor of LGU if: Local autonomy Local concern/ issue Isolated issue

    No law will be violated Amounted to control Beyond powers of NGA/

    GOCC Local concerns are best

    addressed by LGUs(Principles of Subsidiarityand Stewardship)

    Local/ MunicipalDimension Rule

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    17/46

    3. Powers of LGUs

    LGUs not possess inherent powers LGUs have constitutional and statutory

    powers

    Powers interpreted in favor of LGUs (localautonomy; fiscal autonomy; National vs.Local)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    18/46

    3.1 Police Power

    Delegated to all LGUs Basis of Police Power: General Welfare

    Clause

    Reason for Delegation: Dual Agency 2 Requisites: Lawful Subject (equalprotection; public interest requiresinterference) andLawful Method (due process;reasonable means = purpose)

    2 Branches: General Legislative and PolicePower Proper

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    19/46

    3.1 Police Power

    Can or Cannot be Done?

    1. Prohibit establishment of PAGCOR casinos2. Prohibit setting up of PCSO lotto outlets3.

    Regulate Jai Alai frontons

    4. Regulate professions regulated by PRC5. Operate dumpsites in violation of environmental

    standards

    6. Issue drivers licenses7. Register motor vehicles8. Regulate or Tax jueteng

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    20/46

    3.1 Police Power

    9. Prohibit the operation or establishment of massageparlors, beerhouses, motels, etc. in a certain area/road or conversion to other businesses without justcompensation

    10.Order the closure of a bank not performing illegalactivities for non-payment of taxes

    11. Padlocking of an establishment without accordingowner due process

    12.Allow 3 cockpits13. Declare a bus terminal a nuisance per se and orderits closure14. Demolition of a building without court order15. Declare a gas station as nuisance per se

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    21/46

    3.1 Police Power

    16. Ban Rallies17. Lease of public plaza18. Wanton denial of issuance of mayors permit19. Mayor not remove oil terminals per ordinance20. Mayor not release funds when appropriations

    approved

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    22/46

    3.2 Eminent Domain

    Definition: Taking, Private Property, PublicPurpose, Just Compensation

    Compared to Police Power: Taking (transfer ofbusiness; portion for indigent - ED; zoning - PP)

    Not Inherent; Delegated; Inferior Domain Limitations: Observance of due process and

    Payment of just compensation (strict construction)

    Foundation: genuine public necessity (otherswilling to sell; other facilities available)

    Enabling Measure: Ordinance (Not Resolution)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    23/46

    3.2 Eminent Domain

    LGU Branch: Legislative and Executive Reason stated in Ordinance Ordinance before Expropriation case

    RTC has jurisdiction Valid and definite offer Comply with Constitution and Statutes (e.g.

    UDHA)

    Immediate Entry: Sufficiency in Form &Substance and Provisional Deposit;Determination of public purpose not required

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    24/46

    3.2 Eminent Domain

    Role of Higher-Reviewing LGU: Question ofLaw - Within Scope, Followed Procedure, NotChoice of Property

    Role of Courts (RTC): Necessity, Choice ofProperty, Just Compensation, Requirements,Compel Execution/ Payment

    Role of NGAs: DA/ DAR approval not required(agricultural land)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    25/46

    3.2 Eminent Domain

    EminentDomain

    Zoning Reclassify Conversion

    Taking Police Power Administrativ Administrativ

    Change ofOwner

    No Change No Change No Change

    Any Land Any Land Agri toNon-Agri

    Agri toNon-Agri

    Change inUse of Land

    No ActualChange

    No ActualChange

    Change inUse of Land

    All LGUs (P)/C/M C/M DAR

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    26/46

    4.1 Fiscal Autonomy

    Local autonomy includes both administrative andfiscal autonomy. Fiscal autonomy means that local governments

    have the power to create their own sourcesofrevenue in addition to their equitable share in the

    national taxes released by the national government,as well as the power to allocatetheir resources inaccordance with their own priorities.

    It extends to the preparation of their budgets,and local officials in turn have to work within the

    constraints thereof. They are not formulated at thenational level and imposed on local governments,whether they are relevant to local needs andresources or not.

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    27/46

    4.1 Fiscal Autonomy

    The only way to shatter this culture of dependenceis to give the LGUs a wider role in the delivery ofbasic services, and confer them sufficient powersto generate their own sources for thepurpose. (no local autonomy without fiscalautonomy and vice-versa)

    The important legal effect of Section 5 (of Article Xof the 1987 Constitution) is that henceforth, ininterpreting statutory provisions on municipal

    fiscal powers, doubts will have to be resolved infavor of municipal corporations. NGA cannot impose limitation when law imposes

    none. (allowance of judges, RATA)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    28/46

    4.2 Power to Tax

    Nature of Grant: Constitutional (not merelystatutory); Not Inherent (subject to congressionalcontrol)

    Object:Widen tax base of LGUs Tax Exemption:limited and restrictive nature ofthe tax exemption privileges under the Local

    Government Code is consistent with the State policyto ensure autonomy of local governments; One ofthe most significant provisions of the LGC is the

    removal of the blanket exclusion of instrumentalitiesand agencies of the national government from thecoverage of local taxation. (pre and post-LGC)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    29/46

    4.3 Internal Revenue Allotment

    Alvarez 1996:IRA part ofincome Pimentel 2000:Withholding of IRA amounted to control

    and infringed on fiscal autonomy; Requirements underLGC not followed (executive withholding)

    Batangas 2004:Placement of IRA in Local GovernmentSpecial Equalization Fund violative of fiscal autonomyand automatic release provision (legislativewithholding)

    ACORD 2005:Earmarking of IRA in UnprogrammedFunds does not conform with automatic releaseprovision; GAA cannot amend LGC (legislativewithholding)

    CSC 2005:No Report, No Release policy runscounter to automatic release provision (executive

    withholding)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    30/46

    4.4 Other Sources of Funds

    Constitutional Equitable Share in Utilization and Development of

    National Wealth Fees and Charges Other SourcesStatutory Loans Grants Private Sector Participation Bonds and Debentures

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    31/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Characterization

    Delegated Authority Subordinate Legislation

    Denominated Legislation Derivative LegislationPresumptions

    Presumed Valid and Constitutional (substance) Sanggunian presumed to have acted with regularity

    (procedure)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    32/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Local Legislative Bodies Collegial Body (in a session; verbal concurrence) Quorum (all elected and qualified) Voting Requirement (Majority, exception) Integrity of Procedure (parole evidence, oral

    testimony, burden of proof) 1st day of Session (IRP; Other Matters) Readings (3 readings in 1 day) No Coercive Powers Tax Ordinances: Notice and Public Hearing On Contracts: Prior authorization (ratification)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    33/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Ordinances Resolutions

    Equivalent to Law Expression of Sentimentor Opinion

    Public or Governmental Private or Proprietary

    More or Less Permanent Temporary

    GR: undergo 3 readings GR: undergo 2 readingsAll subject to Veto

    and Review

    Only Some subject toVeto and Review

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    34/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Why Distinguish?

    Legality (expropriation; reclassification)Applicable Procedure (veto and review)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    35/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Tests of Valid Ordinance: Ordinances must NOT: contravene Constitution be inconsistent with Statutes discriminate be unreasonable be contrary to public policy prohibit trade[void legislative act xxxdoesnot confer any right

    nor vest any privilege to xxx]

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    36/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Veto Review

    Intra-LGU Inter-LGU

    Local Chief Executive Higher Sanggunian

    Ultra Vires or Prejudicial toPublic Welfare

    Ultra ViresQuestion of Law

    Province: 15 daysCity/ Municipality: 10 30 days

    Reversal by Override Reversal by Judicial Action

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    37/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Local Chief Executive Vice-Local Chief Executive/Sanggunian

    Executive; Ministerial toImplement; Veto or Approve

    LegislativeEnact, Amend or Repeal

    Appoint Employees ofExecutive Branch

    Appoint Employees of Sanggunian/Office provided Appropriation of

    Sanggunian

    Approves Disbursement Vouchers,Payments, Sign Warrants,

    Purchase Orders for Operation ofExecutive Departments

    Approves Disbursement Vouchers,Payments, Sign Warrants,

    Purchase Orders for Operation ofSanggunian

    Appropriations: Veto; If Approved,release of Public Funds authorized

    Passage of AppropriationsOrdinance

    Cockpits: Business Permit Enabling Ordinance: License

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    38/46

    5. Local Legislation

    Role of NGAs: When there is a Law andonly on Questions of Law (i.e. DOJ, DBM,not DENR)

    Role of Courts: Declare Invalid, Illegaland Unconstitutional (declaratory relief)

    Contracts: Prior authorization(unenforceable; may be ratified acquiescence and benefit e.g. recognition;specific and current appropriation)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    39/46

    6. Public Accountability

    2 Levels: Corporate and Personal 2 Capacities: Governmental and Proprietary faithfully discharge their duties and functions as

    provided by law

    Accountable Public Officers Real Party in Interest (dismissal and

    appointment)

    Loyalty/ 1-Office Rule Performance ofConstitutional and StatutoryDuties (i.e. midnight appointments, termination ofbarangay treasurer)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    40/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Subject to Disciplinary Action (part ofSupervision; Types of Offenses administrativeand penal)

    2 Authorities: Disciplining and Investigation

    Enjoys Fixed Term; Has Term-Limit Subject to Several Jurisdictions Effect ofRe-Election on cases Rule on Succession (Acting Capacity,

    Ranking, Last Vacancy, 2nd placer)

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    41/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Term of Office

    Municipality converted to a City (or barangay inmunicipality later converted to a city)

    6 Conditions:

    Elected to the PositionFully Served the TermNo Actual BreakImmediate ReelectionRegular ElectionsInvoluntary

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    42/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Disciplinary Action:Violation of

    1. 1991 Local Government Code2.

    Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act3. Revised Penal Code and other Penal Laws

    4. Omnibus Election Code5. Other Special Laws

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    43/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Offenses:Examples1. Usurpation of Authority (mayor under preventive

    suspension)2. Reliance on Subordinates (exception)3. Technical Malversation (use diverted)4. Unwarranted Benefits (salary to dismissed employee)5. Financial or Pecuniary Interest (license to cockpits)6. Moral Turpitude (fencing)7. Bad Faith (signing of voucher)8. Illegal Dismissal (corporate vs. personal liability)9. Grossly disadvantageous contract10. COA-approved Disbursements11. Partial Restitution of Cash Shortage (misappropriation)12. Onion-skinned Officials

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    44/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Procedure in Administrative Cases Constitutional Rights of Accused Procedural Due Process Form of Complaint Substantial Evidence Notice of Session not required Decisions when final and executory Stay of Execution Rule on Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies When appeal Effect of filing of Motion for Reconsideration

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    45/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Penalty

    Removal by Courts only(exception)

    Each administrativeoffense, 6 months

    Preventive Suspension

    Prerequisites (andexceptions)

    Grounds supported byevidence

    Period (Higher LGU/Sandiganbayan: 60 days;Ombudsman: 6 months

    MR with Higher LGUbefore Courts

    Authority of President/Ombudsman

  • 7/30/2019 Consolidated Local Govt

    46/46

    6. Public Accountability

    Recall

    No PRA, only Popular Petition (RA 9244)

    Loss of Confidence a political questionAnother Petition if Official succeeds to

    another office

    1-Year Ban refers to Recall Election

    Meaning ofRegular Recall Election