Considerations for Implementing Combined Heat and Power in Highrise Residential Buildings: Lessons...
-
Upload
sherman-mccoy -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of Considerations for Implementing Combined Heat and Power in Highrise Residential Buildings: Lessons...
Considerations for Implementing Combined Heat and Power in Highrise Residential Buildings:
Lessons Learned
February 4th 2010
Accelerating the adoption of green building technologies and contributing to the transformation of the built environment.
Objectives:
• Evaluate new green building technologies & equipment through in-situ testing and monitoring in new and existing high rise buildings;
• Leverage knowledge and experience of leading developer and building owner(s) to strengthen the cleantech product development and commercialization value chain.
Sewage Treatment
What is Combined Heat & Power
• CHP, or Cogeneration, utilitizes the waste heat from electricity generation to produce simultaneous hot water (thermal energy)
Primary types of equipment:• Microturbines• Reciprocating Engines
Fuel Choices:• Natural Gas (common)• Biofuels (eventually)
Source: www.powerecosystems.com
Sewage Treatment
Equipment Choices
Advantages Disadvantages
Reciprocating Engines •High power efficiency•Lower $/kw•Wide range of sizes•Part load operation•Fast start-up time•Multi-fuel capability•Maintenance well understood•Can operate with low pressure gas
•Must be cooled•Low power:weight ratio•Out-of-balance forces require substantial foundations and anti-vibration isolation•High levels of low frequency noise•High maintenance costs
Micro Turbines •High reliability due to small number of moving parts•Simplified installation•Low maintenance required•Compact size & Light weight•Acceptable noise levels•Some fuel flexibility•Low emissions•High temperature heat exhaust for heat recovery•Acceptable power quality
• Higher Cost/kwh• More specialized expert/qualified service personnel•Extended downtime potential
Sewage Treatment
Potential Benefits: CHP + DG
• Energy Efficiency and Potential Emissions Reductions• Reduction in building electricity demand• Uninterrupted emergency power generation• Distributed generation:
• Enables self reliance & fuel switching flexibility• Reduces efficiency losses from distribution networks• Reduces investment requirements in upstream capacity
(smaller centralized power plants)
Sewage Treatment
Tridel’s Combined Heat & Power Feasibility Studies
1. Single Condominium Building• Tridel, TAF, TRCA, OPA, Enbridge, Provident Energy Management
2. Tandem Towers in New Development Complex• Tridel, Enbridge, Private 3rd Party Utility
Grand Triomphe II540 KW CHP
Solaris I & II @ Metrogate1.2 MW CHP
INPUTS / ASSUMPTIONS$0.035$0.075$0.105
9.87$
1222.19382.18
0.55
539
0.3530.506
$0.012$0.450
SH MMBtuTotal MMBtu Requirement
Co Gen kWhNet kWh from LDC Supply
Co Gen MM BTU InputCo Gen MM BTU Output AvailableCo Gen MM BTU Output Utilized
Co Gen MM BTU Output Not Utilized
Co Gen Gas Input m3Building Gas m3 displaced
Net Gas m3 increasekWh Energy costs Avoided
kWh Regulated Costs AvoidedTotal kWh avoided costs
Increased Gas CostCo Gen Mtce Cost
Net $ Benefit
Net $ Benefit incl. GST
Reduced kW Demand Benefit incl. GST
Total $ Benefit incl GST
Indices% of Total kWh supplied by Co-Gen
% of COGen MMBTU utilized% of Building MMBTU load met by CoGen
% net increase in gas usage
Peak Ann. kW Building - Base CasePeak Ann. kW Building - Co Gen Operation
Building kWh provided by Go-Gen
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
7X24
Mid + On Peak
On Peak
% of CoGen MMBTU Utilized
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
7X24
Mid + On Peak
On Peak
% of Building MMBTU provided by CoGen
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
7X24
Mid + On Peak
On Peak
Size system to deliver less
than base Power load
But you will still have too much
heat in summer
• To optimize system performance, thermal storage is necessary on larger systems
• Then• THen
• To optimize system performance, thermal storage is necessary on larger systems
• Then• THen
Off-PeakTotal54%Mid-Peak
26%
20%Peak
Typical Time of Use for power in
MURBs
Design Considerations
Sewage Treatment
Key Factors in Designing a System
1. Scale• Do not exceed the building’s base load. Stay behind the meter. Too
complicated to grid connect.• Do not exceed the summer thermal (DHW) load. You’ll be dumping hot
water and eroding the environmental benefits.• Size for emergency back-up generator• (Check economics on smaller systems)
2. Operating Schedule• Plan to run the equipment during Peak Periods mainly - and maybe Mid-
Peak.• Do not operate during off-peak, or you’ll erode environmental benefits.• System will mostly likely not be thermal load following for economic
reasons.
3. Thermal Storage• Probably required on residential installations• Adds cost but preserves environmental benefit and system efficiency
Sewage Treatment
Key Factors in Designing a System
4. Location• Installing near the ground may require special exhaust venting• Installing on the roof may require additional sound and vibration
attenuation
5. Cost• Approximately $1000/kw for equipment• $2500/kw installed
6. Maintenance• Use a reliable operator. These systems can be too complex for a condo
board.
7. Design-Build/Own-Operate • A third party can design-build-own-operate, but be mindful of above
considerations
Sewage Treatment
Illustrative Economics of a 540 KW CHP in a New Building
Assuming Time of Use Rates apply
Operating Schedule: 8 hrs/day @ Peak + 6 hrs/day @ Mid (7 months) = 3,036 hrs/year
Avoided Costs from Operation: $277,000/yr
Operating Costs (at $0.38/m3): $186,000/yr
Operating Margin (before interest): $91,000
Install Costs: $1,361,000 - $250,000 (Generator)- $86,400 (Incentive*)- $X (boiler reduction) = $1,024,600
Sensitivity
• $/kwh + 20% improves Operating Margin to $131,500
• + $/m3 + 20% drops Operating Margin to $80,500
Sewage Treatment
Enabling Conditions
1. CSA-282 rule change for emergency back-up systems
2. Retiring old appliances
3. Low input fuel prices
4. Time of Use Rates
5. Coincident Power/Thermal demand
6. Provincial price support mechanism
7. FIT for Biogas ($ $.16/kwh)
1. Equipment start-up times must meet other code requirements
2. Install costs higher for retrofit
3. NG price volatility risk
4. Existing regulated price plan
5. Non-alignment in summer
6. No viable Clean Energy Standard Offer for NG
7. Availability & Price
Constraints