conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

24
Ben Bond Joseph Bishop Department of Geography, Masters in Geographic Information Systems (MGIS), The Pennsylvania audience State University, University Park, PA 16802

Transcript of conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Page 1: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Ben Bond Joseph Bishop

Department of Geography, Masters in Geographic Information Systems

(MGIS), The Pennsylvania audience State University, University Park, PA 16802

Page 2: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

β€’ Introduction β€’ Background About Lake Erie

β€’ Study Area

β€’ Watershed Assessment

β€’ Goals and Objectives

β€’ Methods β€’ IBI Calculation

β€’ Sample Regions

β€’ Workflow

β€’ Analysis

β€’ Results

β€’ Discussion

Page 3: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Western Basin of Lake Erie Historic Problems with

Algal Blooms

Increased Blooms in Recent History

Ecological Shift

Water Processing

Page 4: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Study Area Maumee River Basin

Largest Watershed in Great Lakes

Major Contributor to Lake Erie

Page 5: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Land Cover Dominantly Agriculture

Fertile land from Great Black Swamp

Limited Riparian Vegetation

Page 6: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Watershed Assessment Health Metrics

Chemistry Short Term

Biological Long Term

Page 7: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Ohio Bioassessment Very well supported

Large Database, records since 1974

Ohio Credible data program

Page 8: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Goals and Objectives Goal

to support management efforts and to preserve freshwater in the Western Basin of Lake Erie

Objectives

Quantifying watershed health

Analyzing land use within sample site zones

Performing multiple regression analysis to determine impact of land use on IBI ratings

Page 9: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Methods Delineate Catchment Basins, Riparian buffer zones

and local (1 km circle buffer)

Calculate IBI values

Summarize land use according to each sample point extraction zones

Perform stepwise multiple regression to determine significant factors

Page 10: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Sample Points 20 Years 10 Years

Page 11: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

IBI Calculation Calculated according to

12 Ohio EPA metrics

Ranked on a score of 5-60

Attainment classes

Page 12: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Catchment Basins and Buffer zones 3 Zones examined

Catchment

Riparian Buffer

Local 1km Buffer

All water flowing into sample point across landscape

Calculated based on DEM processing

Page 13: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

NHDplus DEM FDR & FAC

Page 14: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Workflow

Page 15: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Analysis Determine impact of land use within catchment basins

compared to IBI

Exploratory ANOVA to examine variance

Correlation Assessment

Stepwise Multiple Regression

Page 16: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Results Min 1st Quartile Mean 2nd Quartile Max

IBI 0 26 31.16 38 58

Water % 0 0.10 0.51 0.71 25.00

Dev % 0 7.12 14.24 12.40 100.00

Barren % 0 0.00 0.27 0.11 100.00

Forest % 0 4.20 6.76 8.30 58.00

Shrub % 0 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.53

Herb % 0 0.57 1.10 1.58 9.02

Ag % 0 70.92 74.51 84.54 100.00

Wetld % 0 0.06 2.07 2.35 100.00

20% 0 94.66 92.69 98.07 100.00

40% 0 1.18 3.13 2.60 100.00

60% 0 0.33 2.34 1.53 100.00

80% 0 0.10 0.69 0.64 15.32

100% 0 0.06 0.65 0.51 13.60

Page 17: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

ANOVA Exploratory

ANOVA to examine variance.

Performed on catchment basins and riparian buffer zones.

Catchment Riparian Buffer

F Value P Value F Value P Value

Water% -- -- 10.717 0.01

Dev % 104.159 0.001 66.138 0.001

Herb % 5.196 0.05 10.126 0.01

Ag % 18.232 0.001 -- --

Wetld % 3.061 0.1 46.433 0.001

20% 84.531 0.001 50.283 0.001

40% -- -- 3.475 0.1

60% 3.780 0.1 5.349 0.05

Page 18: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Correlation Assessment

Page 19: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Stepwise Multiple Regression Catchment Basins

𝐼𝐡𝐼~ π·π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘’π‘‘πΏπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ + 40%πΌπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘’π‘  +π»π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘œπ‘’π‘  + π‘Šπ‘’π‘‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ + 80%πΌπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘’π‘ 

Riparian Buffer Zone

𝐼𝐡𝐼~ π·π‘’π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘’π‘‘πΏπ‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ + π‘Šπ‘’π‘‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ + π»π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘π‘Žπ‘π‘’π‘œπ‘’π‘  +π‘†β„Žπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘ + 20% πΌπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘’π‘  + 40%πΌπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘’π‘ 

Local Buffer Zone

𝐼𝐡𝐼~ 100%πΌπ‘šπ‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘œπ‘’π‘  + π‘Šπ‘’π‘‘π‘™π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ + π΅π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘› +π΄π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘–π‘π‘’π‘™π‘‘π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™

Page 20: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Discussion Developed land within catchment basin strongest negative

influence on IBI scores

For both catchment and riparian buffer

Unlikely in local buffer

Wetland strongest positive influence on IBI scores

Highly significant at all levels

Possibly less disturbance

Agriculture not identified as significantly impacting IBI

Possibly hidden due to overwhelming majority

Additional stream interactions may be hidden.

Page 21: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Further Studies Further Research

Addition elements

Stronger Predictive Models

Preservation of Lake Erie

Page 22: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

Acknowledgements Joe Bishop

Richard Boulder

Leanne Greenlee

Nate Tessler

Molly Morris and the Morris Lab

Kristina Bond

Page 24: conservation GIS, Geonet, conservation geography, ESRI ...

References Anselin, Luc, Ibnu Syabri and Youngihn Kho (2006). GeoDa: An Introduction to Spatial Data Analysis. Geographical Analysis 38 (1), 5-22. Associated Press (2015, October). Toledo: Millions needed to keep drinking water safe. Detroit Free Press. Retrieved from http://www.freep.com/story/news/health/2015/10/07/toledo-needs-money-

safe-drinking-water-algae/73520616/ Brooks, R., Carline, R., Shortle, J., Bishop, J., Yetter, S., Weller, D., Boomer, K., Stedman, R., Armstrong, A., Mielcarek, K., Constantz, G., Goslee, S., Veith, T., & Piechnik, D. (2011). Conservation Effects

Assessment Project (CEAP) Spring Creek Watershed Study. Brooks, R., McKenney-Easterling, M., Brinson, M., Rheinhardt, R., Havens, K., O’Brien, D., Bishop, J., Rubbo, J., Armstrong. B., & Hite, J. (2008). A stream-wetland-riparian (swr) index for assessing

condition of aquatic ecosystems in small watersheds along the Atlantic slope of the eastern U.S. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 150, 101-117. Comber, J., Wadsworth, R., & Fisher, P. (2008). Using semantics to clarify the conceptual confusion between land cover and land use: the example of β€˜forest’. Journal of Land Use Science, 3(2-3), 185-198. Einheuser, M., Nejadhashemi, A., Wang, L., Sowa, S., & Woznicki, S. (2013). Linking biological integrity and watershed models to assess the impacts of historical land use and climate changes on stream

health. Environmental Management, 51(6), 1147-63. Erol, A., & Randhir, T. (2013). Watershed ecosystem modeling of land-use impacts on water quality. Ecological modelling, 270, 54-63. ESRI (2015). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.3. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute. Ficklin, D., Lou, Y., Luedeling, E., & Zhang, M. (2009). Climate change sensitivity assessment of a highly agricultural watershed using SWAT. Journal of Hydrology, 374, 16-29. Gilliland, W., & Baxter-Potter, W. (1987). A geographic information system to predict non-point source pollution potential. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 23(2), 281-291. Homer, C., Dewitz, J., Yang, L., Jin, S., Danielson, P., Xian, G., Coulston, J., Herold, N., Wickham, J., & Megown, K. (2015). Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous

United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, v. 81, no. 5, p. 345-354 Mack, J. (2006). Developing a wetland IBI with statewide application after multiple testing iterations. Ecological Indicators, 7, 864-881. Merem, E., Yerramilli, S., Twumasi, Y., Wesley, J., Robinson, B., & Richardson, C. (2011). The applications of GIS in the analysis of the impacts of human activities on south texas watersheds. International

Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(6), 2418-2446 Myers, W., McKenney-Easterling, M., Hychka, K., Griscom, B., Bishop, J., Bayard, A., Rocco, G., Brooks, R., Constantz, G., Patil, G., & Taillie, C. (2005). Contextual clustering for configuring collaborative

conservation of watersheds in the mid-Atlantic highlands. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 13, 391-407 Nielsen, J., Trolle, D., Sondergaard, M., Lauridsen, T., Bjerring, R., Olesen, J., & Jeppesen, E. (2012). Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark. Ecological applications, 22(4), 1187-1200. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (1986). Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life: volume I: the role of biological data in water quality assessment (Ohio EPA Publication No.

0055e/0015e). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (2014). State of Ohio water quality standards (Chapter 345-1 of the Administrative Code). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Ohio EPA Monitoring (OEPA). (2015). Bioassessment database. Available from: http://edocpub.epa.ohio.gov/publicportal/ Orr, P., & Jones, G. (1998). Relationship between microcystin production and cell division rates in nitrogen-limited Microcystis aeruginosa cultures. Limnology and Oceanography, 43(7), 1604-1614. R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/ Richards, R., Baker, D., Crumrine, J., & Stearns, A. (2010). Unusually large loads in 2007 from the Maumee and Sandusky rivers, tributaries to Lake Erie. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 65(6), 450-

462. Stow, C., Cha, Y., Johnson, L., Confesor, R., & Richards, R. (2015). Long-term and seasonal trend decomposition of Maumee river nutrient inputs into western Lake Erie. Environmental Science and

Technology, 49(6), 3392-3400. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2012) National Hydrography Dataset Plus – NHDPlus. Available from: http://www.horizon-

systems.com/nhdplus/ U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program, 20151216, USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Best Resolution for HU4-0410 20151216 HU-4 Subregion FileGDB 10.1: U.S. Geological Survey:

ftp://nhdftp.usgs.gov/DataSets/Staged/SubRegions/FileGDB/HighResolution/NHDH0410_931v220.zip U.S. Geological Survey, The National Map, 2015, NED products and services: The National Map, Elevation Program Web page, accessed September 19, 2915 at http://nationalmap.gov/elevation.html United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2008). An introduction to freshwater fishes as biological indicators (EPA Publication No. EPA-260-R-08-016). Washington, DC: U.S.

Government Printing Office. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2013). The importance of water to the US economy, synthesis report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. United States Geological Survey (USGS). (2000). Water quality in the Lake Erie-Lake St Clair drainages: Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, New York, and Pennsylvania, 1996-98 (USGS Circular No. 1203). Unwin, D. (1996). GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 540-551. Wardrop, D., Bishop, J., Easterling, M., Hychka, K., Myers, W., Patil, G., & Taillie, C. (2005), Use of landscape and land use parameters for classification and characterization of watersheds in the mid-

Atlantic across five physiographic provinces. Environment and Ecological Statistics, 12, 209-223. Wynne, T., & Richard, S. (2015). Spatial and temporal patterns in the seasonal distribution of toxic cyanobacteria in western Lake Erie from 2002-2014. Toxins, 7, 1649-1663. Yoder, C., Rankin, E. (1995). Biological criteria program development and implementation in Ohio. In: Davis, W.S., Simon, T.P. (Eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria, Tools for Water Resource

Planning and Decision Making. CRC Press, Boca Rotan, FL.