Conservation Challenges “Habitat” Effects –Land cover change Urbanization Agriculture –Land...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Conservation Challenges “Habitat” Effects –Land cover change Urbanization Agriculture –Land...
Conservation Challenges
• “Habitat” Effects– Land cover change
• Urbanization• Agriculture
– Land use• Natural resources
– Forestry– Fishing– Energy
• Recreation• Communication
– Cell towers
• “Habitat”-Independent Effects– Stewarding, Reserving, and
Restoring Habitat are necessary, but NOT SUFFICIENT
• Exotic Species• Disease• Overharvest• Climate Change• Pollution
Conservation Challenges
• “Habitat” Effects– Land cover change
• Urbanization• Agriculture
– Land use• Natural resources
– Forestry– Fishing– Energy
• Recreation• Communication
– Cell towers
• “Habitat”-Independent Effects– Stewarding, Reserving, and
Restoring Habitat are necessary, but NOT SUFFICIENT
• Exotic Species• Disease• Overharvest• Climate Change• Pollution
√
√√√
√
√
Agriculture
• Global changes:1700-1990 (Meyer and Turner 1992)
– Cropland +392 - 466%
– Irrigated Cropland +2400%
– Closed Forest -15.1%
– Forest and woodland -14.9%
– Grassland/pasture -1%
– Lands drained 1.6 x 106 km2
– Urban settlement 2.5 x 106 km2
– Rural settlement 2.1 x 106 km2
(Lambin et al. 2001)
An Example
From Czech
Republic
All Species
Farmland Specialists
GeneralistsBird Declines continued despite reduction in Agricultural Intensity after fall of communism
(Reif et al. 2008)
Continued decline could be due to: 1. Factors other than Ag 2. Lag effect 3. Cumulative effect of loss of farm area 4. Abandonment of farms
Improving Agriculture for Birds
• Intensification generally reduces bird diversity
• Set asides help (CRP lands, field borders, no till)
• Herkert 2009
Fishing and Seabirds• Eiders and cockles• We hypothesize that the population of common eiders
collapsed as a result of a combination of factors: heavy fishing pressure on high density cockle banks and rather low stocks in mussel cultures over the past 10 years (Camphuysen et al. 2002)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Quillayute (Pacific Coast)
Seattle Washington StateMean
Win
ter
pre
cip
itat
ion
(cm
)
Pre-La Niña (1996-1998)La Niña (1998-1999)Post-La Niña (1999-2000)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Quillayute (PacificCoast)
Seattle Washington StateMean
Weather Station
Mea
n s
pri
ng
tem
per
atu
re (
°C)
Cold Water
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Douglas' Squirrel Gray Jay Steller's Jay
Me
an n
um
ber
det
ect
ed
per
10 m
inu
te p
oin
t co
un
t (5
0m
ra
diu
s)
Pre La Niña (1995-98 average)Post La Niña (1999)
Local Effects on Goshawk Prey
(Bloxton et al.)
95%
Fix
ed K
erne
l (H
a)0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Pre La Niña Post La Niña
When prey decline, hawks have to move more
Lack of prey and increased movement lead to lower
reproduction and survivorship
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
Pre La Niña Post La Niña
Mea
n n
um
ber
yo
un
g f
led
ged
per
occ
up
ied
te
rrit
ory
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Su
rviv
al
Upper 95% CI
Survival
Lower 95% CI
Climate Change
European Migrants
1970 – 1990: big birds and those not in ag areas had best population trends
1990 – 2000: change in migration date most important, habitat specialization also associated with declining populations
(Møller et al. 2008)
What to Do?
• Birds are smart• Birds are mobile• Birds can evolve
rapidly• But when
population size is greatly reduced, extinction happens
• Keep population size (effective population size) large, so innovation and adaptation can continue to occur
Conservation Manifesto
• Active Management to Reduce Limiting Factors• Reservation• Restoration• Reconciliation• Sustainable Concern
– Engage people to adopt a land ethic generally and bird ethic specifically
• Conservation is getting nowhere because it is incompatible with our Abrahamic concept of land. We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. That land is a community is the basic concept of ecology, but that land is to be loved and respected is an extension of ethics.
(Leopold 1948)
A Bird Friendly Morality1. Thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s lawn.
2. Thou shall not allow thy cat to roam.
3. Thou shall make thy windows visible.
4. Thou shall not light the night sky.
5. Thou shall provide food and nest boxes.
6. Thou shall not kill native predators.
7. Thou shall abhor uniformity.
8. Thou shall provide safe passage across thy roadways.
9. Thou shall provide functional connections between terrestrial and aquatic worlds.
10. Thou shall nurture the human bond with nearby nature.
References• Camphuysen, C. J., et al. 2002. Mass mortality of common eiders in
the Dutch Wadden Sea, winter 1999/2000: starvation in a commercially exploited wetland of international importance. Biological Conservation 106:303-317.
• Herkert, J. R. 2009. Response of bird populations to farmland set-aside programs. Conservation Biology 23:1036-1040.
• Livezey, K. B. 2009a. Range expansion of barred owls, part I: Chronology and distribution. Am. Midl. Nat 161:49-56.
• Livezey, K. B. 2009b. Range expansion of barred owls, Part II: Facilitating ecological changes. Am. Midl. Nat. 161:323-349.
• Reif, J. et al. 2008. Agricultural intensification and farmland birds: new insights from a central European country. Ibis 150:596-605.
• Wheeler, S. S. et al. 2009. Differential impact of West Nile virus on California birds. The Condor 111:1-20.