Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the...
Transcript of Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the...
![Page 1: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Scientific The Scientific Consensus on Consensus on Climate Change: Climate Change: How Do We Know How Do We Know WeWe’’re Not re Not Wrong?Wrong?
Naomi OreskesHistory Department &
Program in Science StudiesUniversity of California, San Diego
![Page 2: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
June 2, 2005, SAN FRANCISCO
"I say the debate is over. We know the science. We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now.”
--Arnold SchwarzeneggerSan Francisco, June 2, 2005
![Page 3: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
There is a scientific consensus over the
reality of anthropogenic global warming
![Page 4: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“…most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the
increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.”
IPCC 3rd Assessment (2001)
![Page 5: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
IPCC: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
• Established in 1988 by United Nations Environment Programme and World Meteorological Organization
• Response to scientific predictions of 1970s: global warming due to greenhouse gas emissions likely to become problem.
• Today: scientific experts from > 130 countries.
– Most recent report > 800 authors, >1000 peer reviewers
• Historically unprecedented: scale, scope, ambition.
– Not to do research, but to synthesize and assess it.
![Page 6: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
February 2007: Fourth Assessment Report
February 2007: Fourth Assessment
Report
![Page 7: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
“…most of the observed warming over the last
50 years is very likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.”
IPCC 4th Assessment (2007)
![Page 8: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Scientific position has not really changed
since 2001.
Hardly changed since 1979…
![Page 9: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
"If carbon dioxide continues to increase, [we] find no reason to doubt that climate changes will result, and no reason to believe that these changes will be negligible."
U.S. National Academy of Sciences“Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific
Assessment,” (Charney report), 1979
![Page 10: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“A plethora of studies from diverse sources indicates a
consensus that climate changes will result from man’s
combustion of fossil fuels and changes in land use.”
National Academy of Sciences Archives, An Evaluation of the Evidence for CO2-Induced Climate Change, Assembly of
Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Climate Research Board, Study Group on Carbon Dioxide, 1979, Film Label: CO2 and
Climate Change: Ad Hoc: General
![Page 11: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What’s new since 1979?
Climate change no longer a prediction, now
an observed fact.
![Page 12: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Since the mid 1980s, there has been a steady stream of claims challenging climate science…
![Page 13: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
These claims include…
• No ‘proof’ (science is uncertain)
• No ‘consensus’ (scientists are divided).
• If warming is happening, it’s not anthropogenic (natural variability).
• If it is anthropogenic, it isn’t necessarily bad. Warnings are “alarmist,” “catastrophist.” Changes may be beneficial. (NASA administrator Griffin)
• We can readily adapt to any changes that occur.
• Controlling GHG emissions would destroy the US economy
![Page 14: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Not just “lunatic fringe” or talk radio…
• Leading screenwriter and novelist of our day (Crichton)
• Leaders of U.S. Congress (Senator Inhofe, Congressman Barton)
• Major U.S media outlets (Wall Street Journal, Forbes, Fortune, Financial Times)
• Influential think-tanks (American Enterprise Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Heritage Foundation)
• President and Vice President of the United States
![Page 15: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Last February…
• “I think there’s an emerging consensus that we do have global warming. …Where there does not appear to be a consensus…is the extent to which that’s part of a normal cycle versus the extent to which it’s caused by man, greenhouse gases, etc.”
![Page 16: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Misleading in two ways
![Page 17: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
I. Consensus is not “emerging”(1992)
Called on world leaders to translate the written document into "concrete action to protect the planet."
![Page 18: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
IPCC Second Assessment Report (1995)
“The balance of evidence…suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.…”
![Page 19: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
• Broad consensus of major scientific organizations: IPCC, NAS, AMS, AGU, AAAS
• Supported by data base analysis of the published scientific literature: No disagreement about fact of GW and its mostly human causes
• Consensus established by 1993.
![Page 20: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
II. The consensus includes the question of cause
“…most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is very likely to have been due to the increase
in greenhouse gas concentrations.”
IPCC 4th Assessment (2007)
![Page 21: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
IPCC explicitly rejects the claim that observed changes are natural
variation
“The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice
mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past fifty years can be explained without external forcing….”
![Page 22: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Naysaying has clearly had an effect, because despite the
overwhelming scientific evidence, many Americans are still doubtful
or confused
![Page 23: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pew Research Center for The People and the Press, July 2006
“Little consensus on global warming”…
•70% do believe there is “solid evidence of global warming” but…
•Only 41% believe warming is caused by human activities.
![Page 24: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ABC News Poll, March 2006--64% perceive “a lot of disagreement among scientists” on the question
--Only 1/3 think scientists agree that global warming has begun
--Only 1/3 think rise in world temperatures is “mainly caused by things people do”
Abcnews.go.com/technology/GlobalWarming/Story?id-1750492
![Page 25: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Doubts matter
• Views on scientific consensus predict levels of concern, and willingness to act.
• Those who think scientists mainly agree are much more likely to say the federal government should do something about it.
Abcnews.go.com/technology/GlobalWarming/Story?id-1750492
![Page 26: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Americans are much less concerned about global warming than others…
When asked how “personally concerned”
Only 19% Americans said “a great deal”
– 46% in France
– 51% in Spain
– 66% in Japan–Even Chinese were more concerned: 20%
Pew Research Center for The People and the Press, July 2006
![Page 27: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
But we should be more concerned, because we are the number 1 producer of GHG (and have been for a long time)
![Page 28: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
There is a scientific consensus, but…
How do we know that the consensus is correct?
![Page 29: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
How do we know we’re not wrong?
![Page 30: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Given what we know about history of science, isn’t it
quite possible that the climate consensus is
wrong?
![Page 31: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Yes, it is possible.
![Page 32: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Science is fallible.
![Page 33: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Numerous examples from history of science of consensus, overturned
• Geocentric Universe
• Fixity of species
• Absolute nature of time and space, pervaded by luminiferous aether
• Deterministic character of atomic interactions
• Fixity of continents
![Page 34: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Fair to ask, how do we know our current science won’t be
similarly overturned?
![Page 35: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
How can we justify using science to inform policy, if
the science might be wrong?
![Page 36: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Historians and philosophers have extensively analyzed the
processes that contribute to the reliability of scientific knowledge
We can use this to evaluate any current
science.
![Page 37: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Ideal world:
Did scientists follow the scientific method?
If they did, all is well.If they didn’t, there’s a
problem.
![Page 38: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Real world:There is no scientific
method(singular).
![Page 39: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
However, there are scientific methods.
Accepted scientific standards for evaluating claims.
Many have been around for a long time.
![Page 40: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Five main candidates for scientific methods
and standards
![Page 41: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
1. Methodological standards: Science is reliable by virtue of
using correct method
• Induction: generalization from observations.
• Deduction: hypothetico-deductive method.
• Falsification: science must be disprovable.
• (Cf. appeals to authority or articles of faith.)
![Page 42: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
2. Evidential standards: Science is reliable by virtue of
how it evaluates evidence
Tests of reliability
--Replication, witnessing, and peer review
Tests of consistency
--Consilience of Evidence
![Page 43: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
3. Performance standards: How well does knowledge
hold up in action?•Does it stand up to predictive
tests?•Has it held up over time?•Can we use it to do things in
world?
![Page 44: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
4. Inference to the best explanation
![Page 45: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
5. Community standards (Kuhn)
![Page 46: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Scientists sometimes defend their work (and attack their colleagues) by reference to
their preferred standard.
We can ask:How does a particular
scientific claim stand up to allthese standards?
![Page 47: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
1. Methodological standards
• Is there inductive evidence backing the scientific claims?
•Has climate science passed any deductive tests?
• Is it falsifiable?
![Page 48: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
1.1. Induction: Generalization from evidence
150 years of temperature record, from weather stations around the globe,
for reasons entirely independent of concern about global warming.
![Page 49: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Independent corroboration…
![Page 50: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
1.2 Deduction: If carbon dioxide rises, 1.2 Deduction: If carbon dioxide rises, then we expect increases in temperaturethen we expect increases in temperature
![Page 51: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
1930: 1930: Guy Stewart Guy Stewart
CallendarCallendar
![Page 52: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
1958: Has carbon dioxide risen? Yes.
![Page 53: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Has temperature rising along with it?http://www.climateaudit.org/wp-content/1000yearsco2small.jpg
![Page 54: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Climate science passes the deductive test
Not just a “correlation”It’s a confirmation of a
prediction
(“The scientific method”)
![Page 55: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
1.3 Falsification: Is there some way the consensus could be
proved wrong?
How do we know that the CO2comes from human activities?
Maybe it comes from volcanoes….
![Page 56: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Clear evidence that this CO2 has been produced by burning fossil fuels (Ghosh and
Brand, 2003)
• Clear correlation of falling 13C values with rising CO2
• Absolute values indicate organic carbon source (not volcanoes…)
![Page 57: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Calculations of fossil fuel use since 1850s…
• Rise in CO2 is temporally coincident with massive increases in fossil fuel burning since industrial revolution.
• If this were not so, it would falsify the theory.
![Page 58: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
2. Evidential standards
![Page 59: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
2.1 Has the evidence been subject to replication,
witnessing, and peer review?
![Page 60: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Temperature data has now been extensively replicated using independent methods, such as tree rings and coral reefs. Northern hemisphere data compared with southern.
• Esper et al, 2002, Science
![Page 61: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Peer review? The contrarian claims are the ones that fail peer review.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
methods impacts yes historical mitigation no
![Page 62: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
2.2 2.2 ConsilienceConsilience of evidenceof evidence
OerlemansOerlemans, 2002, Utrecht.Analysis of 169 glacial records, 2002, Utrecht.Analysis of 169 glacial records
![Page 63: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
3. Performance
![Page 64: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Climate models attacked as ”unreliable.”Many model-based predictions have come true.
• Melting of polar ice sheets & continental glaciers
• Polar amplification• Rising sea level • Earlier spring onset• More warming at night than in day• More precipitation in some regions• Intensification of extreme weather events
(Katrina, record-breaking season of 2005)
![Page 65: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
2005: Most intense hurricane season in history
• Most tropical and subtropical storms (28)• Record number (15) became hurricanes• Record number (4) became category 5
– Most “retired” names• Katrina: Costliest ($100 billion damages)
• Wilma: Lowest pressure ever recorded in an Atlantic hurricane
• Hurricane season continued long past “official end”– Official end is Nov. 30, storms continued into January
![Page 66: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Climate models predicted
intensification of hurricanes, caused in
increase in sea surface temperature, well
before 2005
![Page 67: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Two papers in summer 2005 (before Katrina) documented increasing hurricane intensity
Webster et al. (2005) Science 309 Emanuel (2005) Science 436
![Page 68: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Can we prove that the hurricane season of 2005 was caused by global
warming?
No. In principle, other causes could have produced the same effect
![Page 69: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
But if we make a prediction and it comes true, then it is strong evidence, especially…
• … if there are no other plausible causes.
• …if there is no evidence of any alternative cause.
• …if there is independent evidence that the proposed cause (global warming) exists.
![Page 70: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
4. Inference to the best explanation
The goal of science is not merely to develop a possible explanation,
you have to develop the bestexplanation….
That explanation must be based on a cause that you know is actually
occuring in the world (“veracausa”)
![Page 71: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Isaac Newton, Principia Mathematica(1687)
“In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions inferred by general induction from phenomena as accurately or very nearly true not withstanding any contrary hypothesis that may be imagined….…This rule we must follow, [and] may not be evaded by [speculative] hypotheses.”
![Page 72: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
“Evasion by speculative hypothesis” is precisely what contrarians have done
• Proposed speculative hypotheses (about natural variation) without providing evidence of their actual role.
• Speculative reassurances about human capacity for adaptation.
• Alarmist claims about collapse of US economy, largely without evidence
![Page 73: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
5. Community standards
• Despite Newton’s endorsement, many philosophers uncomfortable with idea of inference to best explanation.
• What constitutes best?
• Who decides?
• Using what criteria?
![Page 74: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Answer: Community of scientific
experts
![Page 75: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Thomas Kuhn“Structure of Scientific Revolutions”
Paradigm is not just a particular theory about natural world.
Also a set of standards.
Include things like peer review, and rejection of speculative
hypothesis
![Page 76: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Recently some have asserted “science is not about consensus”
Opposite is true: Science is precisely about
consensus, because consensus is the result of the
application of community standards.
![Page 77: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Answer to issue of scientists “believing in cooling” in 1970s: There was no consensus
Two major groups of scientists studying climate issues
• Ice ages (CLIMAP), time scale of 103-104 yr, vs. early work on anthropogenic climate change, 101-102 yr.
• Hindsight: scientists in Newsweek over-interpreted a short-term signal.
• No general agreement.
![Page 78: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
The claim that there was just 30 years ago there a consensus that the world was cooling
issimply wrong, factually.
![Page 79: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Take home:Climate science satisfies a diversity of evaluative
criteria.
![Page 80: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Methodological: Both inductive, deductive, and falsifiable.
Evidentiary : Strong consilience of evidence through instrumental and proxy records.
Performance: Predicted effects now observed.
Inference to best explanation. All available evidence points towards role of human effects.
Community standards
![Page 81: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
And there is no other “contrary hypothesis”for which there is any substantial evidence that can explain the observed effects.
![Page 82: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Serious evaluation of any science for policy
needs to look at science from diverse
angles
Isn’t there a simpler test?
![Page 83: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
“Consilience of evidence”(William Whewell)
Multiple, independent lines of evidence converging on a single
coherent account.
![Page 84: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
The Rejection of Continental Drift
![Page 85: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
A A consilienceconsilience of of evidenceevidence
Drawn from well-established scientific traditions: stratigraphy, paleontology, structural geology, paleo-climatology.
Collected by respected scientists over decades.
All added up
Du Toit (1927)
![Page 86: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Why did rejecters reject it?
![Page 87: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
BowieBowie’’s rejection was s rejection was based on geodetic based on geodetic
evidence, collected by evidence, collected by his mentor, John his mentor, John
HayfordHayford, at US Coast , at US Coast and Geodetic Surveyand Geodetic Survey
![Page 88: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Bowie’s objection
Continental drift was incompatible with the model of the Earth’s crust accepted by
American geophysicists.
![Page 89: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
The HayfordSpheroid
• Early 1900s, American geodesist John Hayford, Chief of Geodesy at the U.S.C.G.S., developed a model to interpret surface gravity measurements.
• Produced a new value for the figure of the Earth
![Page 90: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
In 1924, Hayford spheroid adopted as international standard by IUGG.
![Page 91: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Bowie, became one of America’s most active and vocal opponents of drift.
Persuaded many others.
Major factor in American rejection of theory.
The Hayford model was incompatible with drift.
![Page 92: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
In drawing this conclusion, he ignored all the other data (from stratigraphy, paleontology, paleo-climatology, etc…)
![Page 93: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
He violated principle of consilience of evidence:
How does all the evidence stack up?
![Page 94: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Made his choice wholly on the basis of geodeticevidence (from his own
speciality)…
![Page 95: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
……and ignored and ignored the large body of data the large body of data from various geological from various geological
specialties that specialties that independently argued in independently argued in favor of continental favor of continental
drift.drift.
![Page 96: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
A common pattern:
Prejudice…Intellectual chauvinism…
![Page 97: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Epistemological affinities
We all gravitate towards certain kinds of evidence and
arguments, and they tend to be the ones with which we are
most familiar (either intellectually or sociologically)
![Page 98: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Charles Richter (1958):“We are all best impressed by evidence of the type with which
we are most familiar.”
Bill Menard (1986):Some…scientists believe in
God and some in Country, but all believe that their own …data
are without equal, and they adjust other data to fit them.”
![Page 99: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
No one had to make a huge policy decision in the 1920s that
hinged on whether or not continental drift
was true
![Page 100: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
We do have to make decisions about global warming
Doing nothing is a decision.
![Page 101: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Why the scale and scope IPCC are so important
ItIt’’s all about s all about consilienceconsilience of of evidence. evidence.
ItIt’’s about looking at the big s about looking at the big picture.picture.
![Page 102: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
In early 1980s, officials in the Reagan
administration argued that the situation was not urgent, we had time
to wait and see.
We have waited and we have seen.
![Page 103: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Earth scientists been studying the role of carbon dioxide in climate change for longer than it took
them to come to consensus on continental drift.
![Page 104: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Thousands of scientists have assessed and reviewed the
evidence, and assessed and reviewed it again, and again,
and again.
![Page 105: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
In four reports, over nearly 20 years,
leading experts around globe have affirmed
the reality of anthropogenic warming--now no longer as a prediction, but as an observational reality.
![Page 106: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Conclusion they have come to is one that we actually already
knew in 1965…
![Page 107: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
“This generation has altered the composition of the atmosphere on a global scale through…a steady increase in carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.”
--Lyndon JohnsonSpecial Message to Congress, 1965
![Page 108: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
The effect of that alteration is now clear.
Muir Glacier, Ak: August, 1941 (photo by William Field) August, 2004 (photo by Bruce Molnia)
![Page 109: Consensus in Science: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong ... · We see the threat, and we know the time for action is now. ... that we do have global warming. …Where there does not](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022042309/5ed5ed2438044f6a1120ca03/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
The End.