Conole thinktank

17
Accreditation of informal and non-formal learning Gráinne Conole, Project Evaluator 10 th November 2014 National Think Tank Sydney National Teaching Fellow 2012 Ascilite fellow 2012 EDEN fellow 2013

Transcript of Conole thinktank

Page 1: Conole thinktank

Accreditation of informal and non-formal learning

Gráinne Conole, Project Evaluator10th November 2014National Think Tank

Sydney

National Teaching

Fellow 2012 Ascilite fellow 2012EDEN fellow 2013

Page 2: Conole thinktank

• External evaluator• Focus on:– Vision– Process– Outputs – Impact– Dissemination

Page 3: Conole thinktank

Outline

• Issues• Projects– The OPAL initiative– POERUP – VMPass– OpenEd

• Mapping informal and formal learning

Page 4: Conole thinktank

• Emergence of OER and MOOCs challenging formal education

• New business models emerging• How to accredit informal and non-formal

learning

Page 5: Conole thinktank

The OPAL metromap

http://www.oer-quality.org/

Evaluation shows lack of uptake by teachers and learnersShift from development to community building and articulation of OER practice

Page 6: Conole thinktank

POERUP Achievements

• Inventory of more than 500 OER initiatives worldwide

• 33 country reports - most being updated

• 7 case studies including Wikiwijs, ALISON (Ireland), OER U (global) and FutureLearn (UK mostly)

• 3 EU-level policy documents for universities, VET and schools

• 8 policy documents for UK (x3), Ireland, France, Netherlands, Poland – and Canada

KA3 ICT

Page 7: Conole thinktank

Themes for policy recommendations• Communication and awareness raising• Funding• Copyright / licensing • Reducing regulatory barriers• Quality • Teacher training and continuous professional development• Certification and accreditation• Infrastructure • Further research

7

Page 8: Conole thinktank

Many learners wish to have formal, transferable recognition of their knowledge & skillsChallenges:•New players (private sector, non-profit) in unbundled learning provision•Open learning recognition is a recent topic, lack of guidelines for interested actors

Page 9: Conole thinktank

Many learners wish to have formal, transferable recognition of their knowledge & skills!Potential•Recognition would –create a link between traditional and open and flexible learning–Create trust in OER, MOOCs, OCW, Virtual Mobility

•Assessment and recognition might become a business model for OER, MOOCs, OCW…

Page 10: Conole thinktank

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Learning Passport for accreditation

Page 11: Conole thinktank

•Applied Quality Procedures•Estimated Hours of Workload•Learning Outcomes described (Knowledge, Skills, Competences)•Learning activities required by the learner•Certification options

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 12: Conole thinktank

•General personal information•Period in which study occurred•Information about the learning activities + evidence source (e.g. PORTFOLIO)

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 13: Conole thinktank

•Assessment Components (form)•Which LO were verified?•Quality Control Procedures for Assessment

•Equivalence of certification within institution•Position of certification within qualification framework•Grading scheme (pass/fail, numerical)

Information from OER provider (HEI) Information from

learner

Information from assessing/certifying

institution

Page 14: Conole thinktank
Page 15: Conole thinktank

Accrediting open learning

Page 16: Conole thinktank

Formal

Informal

Individual Social

Blended courses

DL+ social media

Trad. campus courses

DL courses

OER

xMOOCs

OER + Social media

cMOOCs

APELePortforliosOERuBadges

Formal/informal landscape

Page 17: Conole thinktank

http://www.slideshare.net/GrainneConoleEmail: [email protected]

Blog: http://e4innovation.comTwitter: @gconole