Connecting the Dots: Linking Tier 2/3 Systems Data and Practices … PBIS 2014... · 2017. 12....
Transcript of Connecting the Dots: Linking Tier 2/3 Systems Data and Practices … PBIS 2014... · 2017. 12....
CONNECTING THE DOTS:
LINKING TIER 2/3 SYSTEMS
DATA AND PRACTICES TO THE
CORE BEHAVIOR CURRICULUM
Lucille Eber, Director Midwest PBIS Network
10th Annual New England Positive Behavior Support Forum PBIS: Research to Practice
May Institute and National TA Center for PBS
THIS SESSION WILL DESCRIBE:
• How all Tiers in MTSS need to be linked and layered with a specific focus on Tier 2/3 development.
• Examples of how tools and interventions can be applied to ensure higher tiered interventions are can be more rapidly and effectively delivered by building on a solid Tier 1 foundation will be provided.
QUESTION #1
• Behavior support is the redesign of environments, not the redesign of individuals.
• Positive behavior support plans define changes in the behavior of those who will implement the plan. A behavior support plan describes what we will do differently.
What steps can be taken to ensure ALL staff understand the
context for SW-PBS?
What steps can be taken to ensure students in need of Tier 3 supports are
accessing and benefitting from Tier 1 and Tier 2 supports?
Tier 3 supports are most efficient, effective and ‘doable” when scaled up from a ‘core curriculum” of behavior (i.e. Tier 1 and tier 2 supports)
QUESTION #2
School-wide PBS systems must be adapted for the specific population of each school.
Tier 1 may need to be adapted so that what happens Routinely everyday is ‘enough’ for 85% of all students, regardless of your setting. All teachers should expect that 10-15% of kids in every class every day will need a ‘scaled up’ version of Tier 1 (e.g. scheduled, higher frequency of positive contact via CICO)
How can your system be ‘tweaked’ to ensure that 85% of students every day do well with only Tier 1 &
10% are successfully accessing Tier 2?
QUESTION #3
QUESTION #1
What steps can be taken to ensure ALL staff understand the context for SW-PBS?
QUESTION #2
What steps can be taken to ensure students in need of Tier 3 supports are accessing and benefitting from Tier 1 and Tier 2
supports?
QUESTION #3
How can your system be ‘tweaked’ to ensure that 85% of students every day do well with only Tier 1
& that 10% are successfully accessing Tier 2?
MORE STUDENTS ACCESS TIER 2/3
INTERVENTIONS WHEN TIER 1/UNIVERSAL
IS IN PLACE
7.94%
4.95%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Partially Implementing
(n=26)
Fully Implementing
(n=125)
% s
tud
en
ts
FY09 School Profile Tool: Students Accessing Tier 2/Tier 3 Interventions
© Dean Fixsen, Karen Blase, Robert Horner, George Sugai, 2008
PROBLEM
• Innovative practices do not fare well in old organizational structures and systems
• Organizational and system changes are essential to successful use of innovations
Expect it
Plan for it
• Exploration-Adoption
• Installation
• Initial Implementation
• Full Implementation
• Innovation
• Sustainability
IMPLEMENTATION OCCURS
IN STAGES:
Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005
2 – 4 Years
IT TAKES A SYSTEM…
District Level Structures are Critical…
TIER 2/TIER 3 READINESS
• District-level support is necessary for successful building-level Tier 2 & 3 implementation
– District commitments should be in place before Tier 2/Tier 3 training occurs
• Building-level leaders should be aware and supportive of what Tier 2/Tier 3 requires
TERTIARY LEVEL SYSTEM
COMPONENTS INSTALLATION STAGE
1. District Planning Team to address the system challenges and address the data trends to be changed.
2. Building level tertiary systems planning team to monitor progress of tertiary plans and address challenges at building level.
3. Tertiary Coaching (District level).
4. Facilitators identified and “positioned” to facilitate Tier 3 teams and plans for 1-5% of students.
5. Comprehensive training and technical assistance plan.
6. Data system/tools to be integrated into tertiary practices.
LET’S DO THE MATH
1) What is your total building population? 2) What would 5% of your building population be? What would 15% be?
Consider these two numbers for a range of students who should be receiving Secondary Interventions
3) What would 1% of your building population be? 3%? Consider these two
numbers for a range of students who should be receiving Tertiary Interventions.
4) Using these calculations, what are the potential number of students your
building could be serving at each Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention?
5) What are some steps can your building take to prepare to serve these students?
COMPONENTS OF TIER 2/3
MODEL
• Differentiated Teaming Structures – Across all 3 Tiers – Assigned roles for Coordination/Facilitation
• A Full Continuum of Interventions – Scaling up and down the continuum
• Universal Screening – Beyond ODRs
• Ongoing Use of More Specified Data – Tools for Monitoring Systems and Outcomes
Tier 1/Universal
School-Wide Assessment
School-Wide Prevention Systems
SIMEO Tools: HSC-T, SD-T, EI-T
Check-in
Check-out (CICO)
Group Intervention with
Individualized Feature
(e.g., CICO with ind. features
and Mentoring)
Brief Functional Behavior Assessment/
Behavior Intervention Planning (FBA/BIP)
Complex or Multiple-domain FBA/BIP
Person Centered Planning:
Wraparound/RENEW
Family Focus
ODRs,Credits,
Attendance,
Tardies, Grades,
DIBELS, etc.
Daily Progress
Report (DPR)
(Behavior and Academic Goals)
Competing Behavior
Pathway, Functional
Assessment Interview,
Scatter Plots, etc.
Social/Academic
Instructional Groups (SAIG)
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS & SUPPORTS: A MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT MODEL (MTSS)
Adapted from T. Scott, 2004
Tier 2/
Secondary
Tier 3/
Tertiary
Individual Student
Information System (ISIS)
3-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT
NECESSARY CONVERSATIONS (TEAM MEETINGS)
Check-In
Check-Out
Skills
Groups
Group w.
individual
feature
Complex
FBA/BIP
Problem Solving
Team Meeting
Tertiary Systems
Team Meeting
Brief
FBA/BIP
Brief
FBA/BIP
Wraparound
Secondary
Systems Team
Meeting
Plans
schoolwide &
classroom
supports
Uses process data;
determines overall
intervention
effectiveness
Standing team; uses
FBA/BIP process for
one student at a time
Uses process data;
determines overall
intervention
effectiveness
Rev. 11.19.2012
Universal
Team
Meeting
Universal
Support
Illinois PBIS Network
DAILY PROGRESS REPORT (DPR) SAMPLE
NAME:______________________ DATE:__________________
Teachers please indicate YES (2), SO-SO (1), or NO (0) regarding the student’s achievement in relation to the following sets of expectations/behaviors.
EXPECTATIONS
1 st block 2 nd block 3 rd block 4 th block
Be Safe 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Respectful 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Responsible 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Total Points
Teacher Initials
Adapted from Grant Middle School STAR CLUB
Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken
DAILY PROGRESS REPORT (DPR) SAMPLE
NAME:______________________ DATE:__________________
Teachers please indicate YES (2), SO-SO (1), or NO (0) regarding the student’s achievement in relation to the following sets of expectations/behaviors.
EXPECTATIONS
1 st block 2 nd block 3 rd block 4 th block
Be Safe 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Respectful 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Responsible 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Total Points
Teacher Initials
Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken
“Social &
Academic
Instructional
Groups”
Walk to class
Keep hands to self
Use appropriate
language
Raise hand to speak
Bring materials
Fill out assignment
notebook
Adapted from Grant Middle School STAR CLUB
DAILY PROGRESS REPORT (DPR) SAMPLE
NAME:______________________ DATE:__________________
Teachers please indicate YES (2), SO-SO (1), or NO (0) regarding the student’s achievement in relation to the following sets of expectations/behaviors.
EXPECTATIONS
1 st block 2 nd block 3 rd block 4 th block
Be Safe 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Respectful 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Be Responsible 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0
Total Points
Teacher Initials
Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken
Use your words
Use deep breathing
Keep arm’s distance
Use #2 voice level
when upset
Ask for breaks
Self-monitor with
DPR
“Individualized Student Card
After FBA/BIP"
Adapted from Grant Middle School STAR CLUB
QUICK REFLECTION
• Where is your state/district/school(s) with regards to development or use of Tier 3 readiness criteria?
EXPONENTIAL GROWTH IN
TIER 3 TRAINING
• Over 300 people from 80 LEAs. • 25 Tier 3 events during the Fall 2013. • 30 more LEAs (+60%) and 87 more people than all of last year
combined.
COACHING BUILDS FLUENCY
• Important component for implementing
interventions with fidelity (Rodriguez, Loman, & Horner,
2009).
Tier 2/ 3 interventions require more specific support for coaches.
Dosage to match complexity of interventions.
• Ongoing coaching provides strategies to: Stay “at-the-table” over time. Keep team, student, and family equally engaged. Emphasize student and family strengths.
COORDINATOR VS. FACILITATOR
Facilitator
• Directly provides intervention support services to youth/families
• Roles include: meeting with students for CICO, running groups
Coordinator
• Organizes and/or oversees the specific interventions such as CICO, S/AIG & Group with Individual Features
• Roles include: scheduling meetings, review & collect data to share during team meetings, etc…
REDEFINING THE ROLE OF THE
BEHAVIOR SPECIALIST
District Behavior
Specialist
Support
Teams
building
behavior
support
plans from
Assessment
information
Train 2-3
people per
school to
conduct
“Basic”
FBA/BSP
Train and
coach use of
EBP at the
school-wide
and
individual
student level
REFLECTION
• How would this model of rethinking District Behavior Specialist work within your district/state?
COACHING TIER 3
IMPLEMENTATION
Complex FBA/BIP
Wraparound
Wrap-based RENEW
TERTIARY INTERVENTIONS
PHASES OF TIER 3 COACHING
• Phase 1: Modeling - Coach models the desired skills and competencies
• Phase 2: Support and Feedback - Coach provides support and feedback
• Phase 3: Monitoring – Coach monitors to ensure fidelity
DO FOR – DO WITH – CHEER ON
IL COACHING PLAN FOR TIER 3
INTERVENTIONS
• Coaches & Facilitators participate in intervention specific training Facilitator/s begin implementing intervention immediately (i.e. identify youth within week or two of training)
• Coaches connect with Tier 3 Facilitators to answer questions, ensure youth are identified & Tier 3 processes are starting, and ensure Facilitators are signed up for Adobe Connect Tier 3 TA
• Within several weeks of training, Facilitators and Coaches participate in an Adobe Connect Tier 3 TA group call – Facilitators continue to participate in Adobe Connect Tier 3 TA group calls
monthly until fluent with the intervention – ECs continue to participate in Adobe Connect Tier 3 TA group calls monthly
until fluent with providing Tier 3 TA themselves
• ECs sustain process of providing intensive Tier 3 TA for their district/s • Facilitators & coaches may be invited to participate in a Tertiary Learning
Community (TLC)
LOGISTICS FOR TIER 3 TA
PROCESS/CALLS
• Trainers connect with Coaches • Coaches gather Tier 3 plans from Tier 3 Facilitators and forwards to
Trainers • Trainer uses track changes to highlight positive notes,
comments/questions, and corrections to each plan submitted and sends back to Coaches to give back to Facilitators – Coaches should review edited to plans to learn how to replicate this
process in future • Trainer selects 2-3 plans to review on each call
– Facilitators of those plans are on the call to receive the TA – Other Facilitators listen/observe to make or understand edits to their
own plans – Coaches listen/observe to learn how to replicate this process in future
• Process repeats for as many rounds as Coaches & Facilitators need
SAMPLE ?’S FOR WRAPAROUND
TA
• Have you chosen your first child/family, describe
• How did you engage the family? Where did you meet? What questions did they have? How did you describe wraparound?
• What tools have you used to gather information ? (i.e. EI-T, HSC-T,) Describe your experience with the tools
• Describe the strengths inventory process.
• Share the big need, how did you determine the big need?
ADDITIONAL TIER 3 SUPPORT
• Tier 2/3 External Coaches Network meetings
– ECs may bring Tier 3 Facilitators & Internal Coaches
• External Coaches facilitating Network meetings in district for their Internal Coaches & Facilitators
• Participate in follow-up days of trainings, forums, and conferences
REFLECTION:
Does Implementation Strength of Tier 1/2 Impact a District/School’s Capacity to Effectively Implement Tier 3?
TEACHING & LEARNING EXAMPLE
Berwyn District 100 moves toward sustainability with increased coaching,
district-wide FBA/BIP and Wrap training, and district support of “new” FBA/BIP
process.
BERWYN D100 • District 100 (Berwyn) -District administrators attended the Tier 3
readiness webinar in 2012-13 and made necessary steps for Tier 3 training and implementation.
• The district increased external coaching capacity for 2013-14. • During 2013/14 they had 28 district staff trained in FBA/BIP
(includes 4 building admins and 1 district admin) and are currently training 24 district staff in Wraparound.
• During the FBA/BIP training series, the external coach ensured that everyone participated by attending trainings and monitoring the webinars.
• As a result of the FBA/BIP trainings series they have begun to change their FBA/BIP process to align it with the research-based training model (Strickland & Lohman).
• During the course of the training, they began using the team process and competing pathway templates with several students.
BOB
• 1st Grade student • Was in the district for Kindergarten and did not
present with any behavioral problems • During the fall of first grade, Bob, would run out
of the classroom and hide in the school. 911 had to be called on one occasion. The district also called MH Crisis Team (SASS-IL DMH) and the student was out of school for 10 days via SASS program
• Parents refused a partial day program. A referral for special education testing was made.
• Since staff was attending the FBA/BIP training series, they decided to begin a brief FBA/BIP process for this student while the case study was occurring.
• The district coach stated that the reasons for beginning this process was because the district was “ready to outplace the student”.
BOB SMITH’S FBA
BOB
• IEP was finalized in December – OHI for ADHD
• Parents refused medication
• Bob was moved to a co-taught classroom to start his day.
• He is in regular education 80% of his day.
PROGRESS DATA
• CICO DPR data – 80% of points except on 2 days
• Prior to the intervention and IEP – Out of school for 10 full days. Post – left early for 1 day due to behavior
• Academic information: Bob did not progress academically during the fall. After January he has started to make progress and complete assignments.
IMPACT OF PBIS ON STUDENTS
WITH DISABILITIES
• Nationally, students with disabilities suspended from school at TWICE the rate of non-disabled peers (Losen & Gillespie, 2012).
• At greater risk of academic failure and drop out of school.
MONITORING EQUITY
• To improve outcomes for ALL students, important to track the most vulnerable to determine effectiveness of multi-tiered systems of behavior support.
Ethnicity
Disability
Ethnicity & Disability
REDUCING SUSPENSIONS FOR
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
• Data were analyzed from 166 IL
elementary schools over 3 years. Students with disabilities had a 72% reduction in OSSs ,
and
Students without disabilities also had substantial 59% reduction.
• Go to www.pbisillinois.org/publications/reports
REDUCED SUSPENSIONS FOR
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
• A 72 % decrease in OSSs for students without disabilities, on par with a 68% decrease for students with disabilities .
Steadily reduced risk of suspensions for students with disabilities.
2 DANVILLE CCSD 118 MIDDLE
SCHOOLS SUCCESS FOR STUDENTS
WITH DISABILITIES
• OSSs declined by 56% for students with disabilities, and 27% for students without disabilities.
• Students with disabilities were less likely to be suspended than students without disabilities.
STUDENTS WITH IEPS
SUCCEED AS SCHOOLS BUILD
TIER 2 CAPACITY
QUESTION #1
What steps can be taken to ensure ALL staff understand the context for SW-PBS?
QUESTION #2
What steps can be taken to ensure students in need of Tier 3 supports are accessing and benefitting from Tier 1 and Tier 2
supports?
QUESTION #3
How can your system be ‘tweaked’ to ensure that 85% of students every day do well with only Tier 1
& that 10% are successfully accessing Tier 2?