Conformity

27
CONFORMITY Chapter 7

description

Conformity. Chapter 7. Types of Social Influence. Social Influence as “Automatic”. Chartrand & Bargh The Chameleon Effect : nonconscious form of imitation. Conformity. The tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behavior in ways that are consistent with group norms. Sherif (1936) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Conformity

Page 1: Conformity

CONFORMITY

Chapter 7

Page 2: Conformity

Types of Social Influence

Page 3: Conformity

Social Influence as “Automatic”

Chartrand & Bargh

The Chameleon Effect: nonconscious form of imitation

Page 4: Conformity

Conformity

The tendency to change our perceptions, opinions, or behavior in ways that are consistent with group norms.

Sherif (1936) Autokinetic

effect

Page 5: Conformity

Asch

Page 6: Conformity

Two Types of Conformity

Page 7: Conformity

Majority Influence

What situational factors make us more or less likely to conform? Group size Awareness of the norms A fellow dissenter Difficulty of the task

Page 8: Conformity

Majority Influence

What personal factors make us more or less likely to conform? Age differences Gender differences Cultural influences Self-esteem

Page 9: Conformity

Minority Influence

The process by which dissenters produce change in a group. Moscovici: Consistency strategy Hollander: Idiosyncrasy credits

Do majorities and minorities exert influence in different ways?

Page 10: Conformity

Compliance

Changes in behavior that are elicited by direct requests.

0102030405060708090100

Percentage

That Complied

No Reason Reason Given Irrelevant

Reason

May I Use the Xerox Machine?

Page 11: Conformity

Compliance

How do we get trapped into compliance?

The Norm of Reciprocity Treat others as they have treated you Feeling obligated to return a favor

Page 12: Conformity

Cialdini (2001)

Principles of Influence Reciprocation Scarcity Authority Commitment Liking/friendship Consensus/social validation

Page 13: Conformity

Sequential Request Strategies

The foot-in-the-door: Get someone to comply with a small request first. Request shift: small

large

Page 14: Conformity

Sequential Request Strategies

Low-balling: Increase the size of the request by revealing hidden costs. Request shift: small large

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Percent That

Volunteered

Told 7 a.m. First Told 7 a.m. Later

Page 15: Conformity

Sequential Request Strategies Door-in-the-face: Start with a request

that is so large that it is rejected. Request shift: large small

0

10

20

30

40

50

Percent That Agreed

Real Request Only After Declining InitialRequest

Willing to Take Delinquents to the Zoo?

Page 16: Conformity

Sequential Request StrategiesRequest shift: large small That’s-not-all: Start with inflated request,

then decrease its size by offering a discount.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Sales

75 Cents Reduced to 75 cents

Price of Cupcakes

Page 17: Conformity

Sequential Request Strategies

Page 18: Conformity

Assertiveness

When do

people say NO?

Page 19: Conformity

Is there an unintended message?

Just Say No Training

Page 20: Conformity
Page 21: Conformity

“Your heritage is being vandalized every day by theft losses of petrified wood of 14 tons a year, mostly a small piece at a time.”

Petrified Forest National Park

Page 22: Conformity

Obedience

Behavior change produced by the commands of authority

Milgram’s research The basic procedure 65 percent of participants

delivered the ultimate punishment of 450 volts.

Page 23: Conformity

The Learner’s Protests in the Milgram Experiment

From Experiment 5: New Base-Line Condition, The Learner's Schedule of Protests from Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram, 1974, pp. 56-57.

Page 24: Conformity

Factors that Influence Obedience

Page 25: Conformity

Would you have obeyed?

Page 26: Conformity

Meeus & Raaijmakers (1986)Burger (2009)

Replicating Milgram

Page 27: Conformity

Social Impact Theory (Latane) Social influence depends on:

Strength of a source (status, ability, relationship to target)

Immediacy (source’s proximity in time and space to target)

Number of source persons relative to target persons