Confirmation Bias Rabin and Schrag

2
First impressions matter Rabin and Schrag Model Two states of the world A and B; x 2fA; Bg exhaustive and mutually exclusive. The agent has prior beliefs about x by P[x = A]= P[x = B]=1=2: In evey period t 2f1; 2; 3; :::g the agent receives a signal s t 2fa; bg that is correlated with the true state of the world. Signals received in di/erent times are independent and identically distributed. P[s t = ajx = A]= P[s t = bjx = B]= for some 2 (0:5; 1) : This implies that P[s t = bjx = A]= P[s t = ajx = B]=1 We suppose that the agent may misintrepret signals. In every t 2f1; 2; 3; :::g the agent perceives a signal t 2f; g : If the agent perceives a signal t = he believes that he actually received a signal s t = a and if the perceives t = he believes he has received s t = b: In probabilistic notation these mean that P[ t = js t = a; P[x = A] 1=2] = P[ t = js t = b; P[x = A] 1=2] = 1: But he has some bias P[ t = js t = b; P[x = A] > 1=2] = P[ t = js t = a; P[x = A] < 1=2] = q; with q 2 [0; 1] : If q =0 the conrmation bias is absent and s = a and s = b are always converted to = and = respectively. If q =1 he always misreads signals. The higher is q the more extreme is the conrmatory bias. If agents are not aware of their conrmation bias, then Suppose that the agent has received n signals and n signals, where n >n : His updated posterior belies are given by: P[ t = js t = a]= P [ t = js t = b]=1: and P[ t = js t = b]= P [ t = js t = a]=0: Now P[x = Ajs 1 = a; s 2 = a; s 3 = b]= P[s 1 = a; s 2 = a; s 3 = bjx = A]P[x = A] P[s 1 = a; s 2 = a; s 3 = bjx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 1 = a; s 2 = a; s 3 = bjx = B]P[x = B] = P[s 1 = ajx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 2 = ajx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 3 = bjx P[s 1 = ajx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 2 = ajx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 3 = bjx = A]P[x = A]+ P[s 1 = ajx = B]P[x = B]+ P = 2 (1 )P[x = A] 2 (1 )P[x = A] + (1 ) 2 P[x = B] Suppose that the agent has received n signals and n signals, where n >n : His updated posterior belies are given by: P[x = Ajn ;n ]= n (1 ) n P[x = A] n (1 ) n P[x = A] + (1 ) n n P[x = B] 1

Transcript of Confirmation Bias Rabin and Schrag

  • First impressions matterRabin and Schrag

    Model

    Two states of the world A and B; x 2 fA;Bg exhaustive and mutually exclusive. The agent has prior beliefsabout x by P[x = A] = P[x = B] = 1=2: In evey period t 2 f1; 2; 3; :::g the agent receives a signal st 2 fa; bgthat is correlated with the true state of the world. Signals received in dierent times are independent andidentically distributed.

    P[st = ajx = A] = P[st = bjx = B] = for some 2 (0:5; 1) : This implies that

    P[st = bjx = A] = P[st = ajx = B] = 1 We suppose that the agent may misintrepret signals. In every t 2 f1; 2; 3; :::g the agent perceives a signalt 2 f; g : If the agent perceives a signal t = he believes that he actually received a signal st = a andif the perceives t = he believes he has received st = b: In probabilistic notation these mean that

    P[t = jst = a;P[x = A] 1=2] = P[t = jst = b;P[x = A] 1=2] = 1:But he has some bias

    P[t = jst = b;P[x = A] > 1=2] = P[t = jst = a;P[x = A] < 1=2] = q;with q 2 [0; 1] :

    If q = 0 the conrmation bias is absent and s = a and s = b are always converted to = and = respectively.

    If q = 1 he always misreads signals. The higher is q the more extreme is the conrmatory bias. If agents are not aware of their conrmation bias, then

    Suppose that the agent has received n signals and n signals, where n > n : His updated posteriorbelies are given by:

    P[t = jst = a] = P [t = jst = b] = 1:and

    P[t = jst = b] = P [t = jst = a] = 0:Now

    P[x = Ajs1 = a; s2 = a; s3 = b] = P[s1 = a; s2 = a; s3 = bjx = A]P[x = A]P[s1 = a; s2 = a; s3 = bjx = A]P[x = A] +P[s1 = a; s2 = a; s3 = bjx = B]P[x = B]

    =P[s1 = ajx = A]P[x = A] +P[s2 = ajx = A]P[x = A] +P[s3 = bjx = A]

    P[s1 = ajx = A]P[x = A] +P[s2 = ajx = A]P[x = A] +P[s3 = bjx = A]P[x = A] +P[s1 = ajx = B]P[x = B] +P[s2 = ajx = B]P[x = B] +P[s3 = bjx = B]P[x = B]]

    =2(1 )P[x = A]

    2(1 )P[x = A] + (1 )2 P[x = B]Suppose that the agent has received n signals and n signals, where n > n : His updated posteriorbelies are given by:

    P[x = Ajn; n ] = n(1 )nP[x = A]

    n(1 )nP[x = A] + (1 )n nP[x = B]

    1

  • If P[x = A] = P[x = B] = 1=2; then it reduces to

    P[x = Ajn; n ] = n(1 )n

    n(1 )n + (1 )n n

    =nn

    nn + (1 )nn :

    2