CONFINEMENT WITHOUT A CENTER: THE EXCEPTIONAL GAUGE GROUP G(2) M I C H E L E P E P E U n i v e r s i...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of CONFINEMENT WITHOUT A CENTER: THE EXCEPTIONAL GAUGE GROUP G(2) M I C H E L E P E P E U n i v e r s i...
CONFINEMENT WITHOUT A CENTER:
THE EXCEPTIONAL GAUGE GROUP G(2)
M I C H E L E P E P EU n i v e r s i t y o f B e r n
(S w i t z e r l a n d)
O U T L I N E• Overview of the deconfinement transition in YM
theory with a general gauge group and motivations
• The group G(2): generalities
• G(2) gauge theories
• Numerical results
• Conclusions
YM
YM + Higgs
• What is the role of the center of the gauge group in the deconfinement transition of Yang-Mills theory?
SU(N) (N)
gauge theory scalar theorySvetitsky-Yaffeconjecture
complicated, local, effective action for the Polyakov looporder of the deconfinement
phase transitionpotential mechanism of
confinement in YM theory
SO(N)(2)(4)(2) (2)
N odd
N=4k+2
N=4k
Spin(N)
K.Holland, M.P., U.J. WieseNucl.Phys.B694 (2004) 35
M.P., Nucl.Phys.B PS141 (2005) 238
E(7)
E(6)exceptionalgroups
G(2), F(4), E(8)
(2)
(3)
trivial center
Sp(N) (2)
Otah and Wingate
Lucini, Wenger, and Teper
Greensite and Lautrup
Tomboulis
Datta, Gavai et al.
De Forcrand and Jahn
Burgio, Muller-Preussker et al.
• Sp(N): increase the size of the group keeping the center (2) fixed generalization of SU(2)=Sp(1); pseudo-real representation
• (3+1)-d: only Sp(1)=SU(2) YM theory has a 2nd order deconfinement p.t.
What about confinement in YM theory with a gauge group with trivial center?
center: no information about the order of the deconfinement transition
conjectureconfined phase deconfined phase(colorless states) (gluon plasma)
size of the group determinesthe order of the p.t.
Sp(2)10 Sp(3) 21
K.Holland, P. Minkowski, M.P., U.J. Wiese Nucl.Phys.B668 (2003) 207
K.Holland, M.P., U.J. Wiese
Nucl.Phys.B694 (2004) 35
• Potential relevance of topological objects in the mechanism of confinement in non-Abelian gauge theories. Possible candidates: ’t Hooft flux vortices.
1( G / center(G) ) {}
• Gauge theories without ’t Hooft flux vortices: study how confinement shows up.
G(2) SU(3)
What about confinement in YM theory with a gauge group with trivial center?
• G(2): simplest group such that
1( G(2) / {} ) = {}
G(2): generalities
• G(2) SO(7) [ rank = 3; generators = 21]
det = 1 ; ab = a´b´ a a´ b b´
Ta b c = Ta´ b´ c´ a a´ b b´ c c´ ; T is antisymmetric
14 generators; real representations (fundamental 77)
G(2)-"quarks" ~ G(2)-"antiquarks"
a 0 0
0 -a* 0
0 0 0
a =
• G(2) SU(3) in a real rep.• G(2) has rank 2
a = Gell-Mann matrices
SU(3){7} {3}{3}{1}
• 14 generators: adjoint representation is {14}
•
{14} {8}{3}{3}SU(3)
14 G(2)-"gluons" 8 gluons + "vector quark" + "vector antiquark"
SU(3)
G(2): its own universalcovering group
rank 2
G(2) SU(3)center(G(2)) = {}
1( G(2) / {} ) = {}
string breaking without dynamical G(2)-"quark"
{7}{14}{14}{14} = {1} …
• Interesting homotopy groups
"3-ality" : all reps mix together in the tensor product decomp.
3( G(2) ) =
2( G(2)/U(1)2) =
1( G(2) / {} ) = {}
instantons
monopoles
no ’t Hooft flux vortices
like SU(3)
unlike SU(3)
G(2) Yang-Mills• Pure gauge: 14 G(2)-"gluons"
6 G(2)-"gluons" explicitly break (3) center(G(2)) = {} quarks for SU(3)• G(2)-YM is asymptotically free
at low energies: - confinement - string breaking: =0 (QCD)
• G(2)-"laboratory": confinement similar to QCD without complications related to fermions.
• Wilson loop perimeter law
{14} {8}{3}{3}SU(3)
V(r)
r
~ 6 G(2)-"gluons"
• Fredenhagen-Marcu order parameter: confining/Higgs or Coulomb phase
(R,T) = 1/2
0 Confining/Higgs
= 0 Coulomb
In strong coupling we are in the confining/Higgs phase
R,T
= (Ux Tabc) Uxy
(Uy Tdef)
ab cd ef
R
R
T/2
T
no counterpart when the gauge group has a non-trivial center
U =
• Finite temperature: different behaviour than SU(3)-YM
(3) unbroken (3) broken
P e-Fq/T P = 0, 0 P 0, = 0• In SU(3)-YM there is a global symmetry that breaks down. In G(2)-YM no symmetry no 2nd order phase transition
1st order or crossover ?
Conjecture: Sp(2) has 10 generators and it has 1st deconfinement p.t.We expect G(2) YM to have also a 1st deconfinement p.t.
dynamical issue: numerical simulations
P z P
P0 P*r P 2
r
Tr U/7
2436
High temperature effective potential • 1-loop expansion of the effective potential for the Polyakov loop
~
1
G(2)
P (1, 2) = ( P, P*,1)
2
1
2
SU(3)
P = diag(ei(1+2), ei(-1+2), e-2i2)
N. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D24 (1981) 475
G(2) Yang-Mills + Higgs {7}• Higgs {7}: G(2) SU(3) = v
6 G(2)-"gluons" pick up a mass MG v
• For MG QCD the 6 massive G(2)-"gluons" participate in the dynamics; for MG QCD they decouple SU(3)
Higgs {7}: handle for G(2) SU(3)
• confinement G(2) SU(3). 6 massive G(2)-"gluons" are {3} and {3} quarks string breaking
{14} {8}{3}{3}SU(3)
V(r) V(r)
rr
MG
0 = 0
SHYM = SYM - +(x) U(x) (x+)x,
^
1/(7g2)
Nt=6SU(3)-YM
G(2)-YM
=1.3
=1.3
=1.3
SU(3)-YM
G(2)-YM
Nt=6
1/(7g2)
=1.3
=1.3
=1.3
=1.5
=1.5
=1.5
SU(3)-YM
G(2)-YM
Nt=6
1/(7g2)
=1.3
=1.3
=1.3
=1.5
=1.5
=2.5
=2.5
=1.5 =2.5
Conclusions• Confinement is difficult problem: not only SU(N) but all Lie groups!
• Conjecture: the size of the group determines the order of the deconfinement p.t.
The center is relevant only if the transition is 2nd order: G(2)14 YM 1st order
(3+1)-d only Sp(1)=SU(2)3 YM has a 2nd order deconfinement p.t.
SU(3)8 YM weak 1st order, no known universality class available
YM with all other gauge groups have 1st order
(2+1)-d SU(2)3, SU(3)8, Sp(2)10 YM has a 2nd order deconfinement p.t.,
SU(4)15 YM: weak 1st or 2nd ?, G(2)14 YM: not known
YM with all other gauge groups have 1st order
Outlook
• Finite temperature behaviour of G(2) YM in (2+1)-d
• Static quark-quark potential and string breaking
• Study of the Fredenhagen-Marcu order parameter