CONFIDENTIAL New York, May 2008 This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it...
-
Upload
eleanore-houston -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
1
Transcript of CONFIDENTIAL New York, May 2008 This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it...
CONFIDENTIAL
New York, May 2008
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company. This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
New York’s future competitiveness as a global financial center
Presentation to the Council on Foreign Relations
Charles Roxburgh
McKinsey & Company | 2
New York vs London – the view in 2006
Recent developments
Priorities to retain competitiveness
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 3
In 2006 there was growing pessimism about the prospects for New York City as a financial center relative to LondonDo you believe this city will become more or less attractive over the next 3 years?
More attractive
About the same
Less attractive
New York City
44
15
41
London
38
8
54
Ranking by responsePercent
Source: McKinsey Financial Services CEO Survey
McKinsey & Company | 4
Regulation was an area of particular concern
Source:McKinsey Financial Services CEO Survey
Which regulatory environment is more business-friendly?
U.S. is much better
U.S. is somewhat better
About the same
U.K. is somewhat better
U.K. is much better
Rules InspireInvestorConfidence
Clarity of Rules
Fairnessof Rules
Uniformityof RegulatoryEnforcement
Simplicity ofRegulatorySystem
Cost ofOngoingCompliance
45
23
2
26
4
31
35
19
13
2
42
32
12
131
45
32
8
13
2
43
31
7
14
5
Ranking by responsePercent
33
34
14
16
3
McKinsey & Company | 5
Several reports helped created a consensus on the diagnosis….
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 6
. . . and a consensus has emerged on necessary actions….. Supports
Drafting+
Principles-based regulations
Better regulatory coordination
Prudential supervision
Securities litigation reform
Accounting reforms/IFRS
SOX reforms
CCMRBloomberg-Schumer Chamber Roundtable Treasury
+
+
+
Source: McKinsey
?
McKinsey & Company | 7
. . . and a consensus has emerged on necessary actions….. Supports
Drafting+
CCMRBloomberg-Schumer Chamber Roundtable Treasury
New & modernized charters
National Commission to study further
+
Regulatory structure rationalization/ consolidation
Immigration reforms for skilled talent, business travellers
Source: McKinsey
National Commission to study further
?
McKinsey & Company | 8
New York vs London – the view in 2006
Recent developments Impact of the Crisis Developments in London
Priorities to retain competitiveness
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 9
Industry revenues pools 2006 – or, where was the money being made?
19
12
17
46
7
5
2112
1926
5
12
Commodities 3
Credit
120123
DCM
ECM
M&A
US
FX
Rates
21
6
10
Europe
12
5
9
5Prop Trading 7
Sec Lending
Equity Derivatives
Cash Equities
Primary
Secondary Fixed Income
Secondary Equities
McKinsey & Company | 10
Where has the crisis hit……
19
12
17
46
7
5
2112
1926
5
12
Commodities 3
Credit
120123
DCM
ECM
M&A
US
FX
Rates
21
6
10
Europe
12
5
9
5Prop Trading 7
Sec Lending
Equity Derivatives
Cash Equities
Primary
Secondary Fixed Income
Secondary Equities
Revenues from primary and secondary credit34% of US 20% of Europe
McKinsey & Company | 11
Three scenarios
SteadySteadyrecoveryrecovery
US & UK recessions short and mild; Europe escapes slow-down and Asia remains decoupled
Credit markets recover in H2 2008; low prices attract sophisticated buyers; liquidity and confidence returns
Limited additional credit losses in Q2 2008 and beyond (~$400-500 bn) Securitization volumes pick up in H2 2008; full recovery by 2010 Investment bank earnings bounce back in 2009
LongLongchillchill
US & UK experience moderate 2 – 3 quarter recessions; Europe and Asia slow but avoid full recession
Credit markets remain depressed throughout 2008 and first half 2009 Total US credit losses in mid range (~$800-$900 bn) Securitization recovers in 2009, but largely “vanilla” structures Further capital raising by banks to repair balance sheets Some minor banks require rescue/bail-out
Protractedworkout
US & UK experience prolonged recessions; Europe and Asia become coupled given slow down in world trade
Credit markets remain depressed throughout 2008 and 2009 Total US credit losses toward top of range (>$1 trillion) Securitization doesn’t recover and banks unable to expand lending to fill gap;
shortage of credit exacerbates economic slowdown Large scale capital raising by banks; further government interventions
McKinsey & Company | 12
Industry revenues under "The Long Chill" scenario
20
24
22
2631
22
32
34
4448
16
15
12
13
13
3813
96
107
51
11
2007
123
369
63
2006
315
126
122
2005
244
96
2008
+0%
Western Europe
North America
Lat.Am., CEEMEA
Non-Japan Asia
Japan
299*
316
132
93
2009
299
125
91
2010
255
Note:2007 and 2008 results include estimated write-downs
Source: McKinsey Global Capital Markets Revenue Pool, team estimate
Projected revenue from 2006 - 10Global, $ Billions
Pre-write-down result
229
McKinsey & Company | 13
REGIONAL MIX OF GLOBAL REVENUES BY SCENARIO IN 2010, PERCENT OF GLOBAL TOTAL$ Billions "Steady
Recovery""The Long
Chill"
5
18
10
29
39
430
2010
4
20
10
28
38
305
2010
A shift towards emerging markets is observed under all scenarios
5 6 7
6 5 5
10 12 14
39
39
248
2005
38
39
321
2006
35
40
373
2007
Japan
Non-Japan Asia
Lat.Am,CEEMEA
North America
Western Europe
Source: McKinsey Global Capital Markets Revenue Pool, team estimate
McKinsey & Company | 14
Developments in London
Weaknesses exposed in UK regulatory structure▢ Lack of clarity in ‘Tri-partite structure’▢ Northern Rock crisis
Proposed tax reforms undermine ‘pro-business’ image▢ CGT▢ ‘Non-dom’ status▢ Corporation Tax
Growing concern about competition from other centers▢ Asia▢ Middle East▢ Europe
McKinsey & Company | 15
New York vs London – the view in 2006
Recent developments
Priorities to retain US competitiveness
Three topics
McKinsey & Company | 16
U.S. now faces a clear choice – bold reforms
Clarify financial market objectives
Move to principles-based and prudential regulation
Enhance regulatory coordination
Reform securities litigation
Modernize charters
Streamline and consolidate agencies
Continue accounting and auditing reforms
Improve immigration policies to ensure needed skills
Source: McKinsey
McKinsey & Company | 17
U.S. now faces a clear choice – bold reforms . . . or just muddle through
Clarify financial market objectives
Move to principles-based regulation & prudential supervision
Enhance regulatory coordination
Reform securities litigation
Modernize charters
Streamline and consolidate agencies
Continue accounting and auditing reforms
Improve immigration policies to ensure needed skills
No clear national objectives
Continue rules-based regulation with emphasis on enforcement
Rely on ad hoc, reactive coordination among agencies
Keep litigious legal environment
Leave charters unchanged
Maintain current complexity and overlap at national and state level
No further accounting or auditing reforms
Leave immigration unchanged
Source: McKinsey
CONFIDENTIAL
New York, May 2008
This report is solely for the use of client personnel. No part of it may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution outside the client organization without prior written approval from McKinsey & Company. This material was used by McKinsey & Company during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion.
New York’s future competitiveness as a global financial center
Presentation to the Council on Foreign Relations