Conference on Research in Mathematics Education...
Transcript of Conference on Research in Mathematics Education...
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate
Mathematics Education presents its nineteenth
Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics
Education
Program Marriott City Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania February 25-27, 2016
!!!!
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America
on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education presents its Eighteenth
Conference on Research in Undergraduate
Mathematics Education Program
!!!
!Marriott City Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania February 19-21, 2015
!!
!
!!!!
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America
on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education presents its Eighteenth
Conference on Research in Undergraduate
Mathematics Education Program
!!!
!Marriott City Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania February 19-21, 2015
!!
!
Conference Planning Committee
Timothy Fukawa-Connelly (Program Chair) Temple University
Nicole Engelke (Local Organizer)
West Virginia University
Jason Belnap (Working Group Coordinator) University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh
Christine Andrews-Larson
Florida State University
Stacy Brown California State Polytechnic
University, Pomona
Paul Dawkins Northern Illinois University
Jessica Ellis
Colorado State University
Estrella Johnson Virginia Polytechnic Institute and
State University
Karen Keene North Carolina State University
Elise Lockwood
Oregon State University
Ami Mamolo University of Ontario Institute of
Technology
Jason Martin University of Central Arkansas --???
Pablo Mejia-Ramos Rutgers University
Kevin Moore
The University of Georgia
Annie Selden New Mexico State University
Megan Wawro
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Keith Weber
Rutgers University
Aaron Weinberg Ithaca College
Michelle Zandieh
Arizona State University
SIGMAA on
RUME
On behalf of the Mathematical Association of America, West Virginia University’s Department of Mathematics, and the RUME Conference Planning Committee, we welcome you to the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education! We have assembled an outstanding program of talks and events for this year’s conference. We hope that you find the conference intellectually stimulating, productive in making connections with colleagues, and socially rewarding. All talks in this year’s program have online links to their accompanying short papers, which we refer to as the RUME Conference Reports. Authors who present at the conference also have the option of submitting a 15-page paper for peer-review consideration for publication in the RUME Conference Proceedings, to be published online later this spring. Guidelines for the RUME Conference Proceedings long papers are available on the conference webpage. Submissions to the RUME Conference Proceedings are eligible for the Best Paper Award. On behalf of the RUME Executive Committee, we would like to thank the RUME Conference Planning Committee for their efforts towards making this a successful conference. Our sincere thanks goes to Christine Andrews-Larson, Jason Belnap, Stacy Brown, Paul Dawkins, Jessica Ellis, Estrella Johnson, Karen Allen Keene, Elise Lockwood, Ami Mamolo, Jason Martin, Pablo Mejia-Ramos, Kevin Moore, Annie Selden, Keith Weber, Megan Wawro, Aaron Weinberg, and Michelle Zandieh. We want to give special thanks to Jason Belnap for organizing the working group process. We also wish to thank the WVU group for their work in making this conference successful. This year we received and reviewed 169 preliminary, poster, contributed, and theoretical report proposals. This work required the time and energy of over 90 reviewers, who prepared evaluations and feedback for authors. We could not carry out the conference without their contribution. Thank you to the 2016 reviewers! If you have comments and suggestions about the submission or review process, please feel free to share them with members of the planning committee (wearing blue nametags) during the conference or send them to Tim at [email protected]. Local organizers will be wearing gold “host committee” name badges, and feel free to ask any of them questions you may have about the conference or Pittsburgh. Should you have any questions, concerns, or compliments about the conference, please do not hesitate to talk to any of us. You will receive an online Conference Evaluation form after the conference and be sure to share your suggestions with us, as we’re always looking for ways to improve. Enjoy and have a wonderful conference! Sincerely,
Nicole Engelke Tim Fukawa-Connelly Local Organizer Program Committee Chairperson
! 1 !
On behalf of the Mathematical Association of America, West Virginia University’s Department of Mathematics, and the RUME Conference Planning Committee, we welcome you to the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education! We have assembled an outstanding program of talks and events for this year’s conference. We hope that you find the conference intellectually stimulating, productive in making connections with colleagues, and socially rewarding.
All talks in this year’s program have online links to their accompanying short papers, which we refer to as the RUME Conference Reports. Authors who present at the conference also have the option of submitting a 15-page paper for peer-review consideration for publication in the RUME Conference Proceedings, to be published online later this spring. Guidelines for the RUME Conference Proceedings long papers are available on the conference webpage. Submissions to the RUME Conference Proceedings are eligible for the Best Paper Award.
On behalf of the RUME Executive Committee, we would like to thank the RUME Conference Planning Committee for their efforts towards making this a successful conference. Our sincere thanks goes to, Jason Belnap, Stacy Brown, Nicole Engelke, Estrella Johnson, Karen Allen Keene, Elise Lockwood, Mike Oehrtman, Kyeong Hah Roh, Ami Mamolo, Jason Martin, Vicki Sealey, Allison Toney, Keith Weber, Megan Wawro, Aaron Weinberg, and Michelle Zandieh. We want to give special thanks to Jason Belnap for organizing the working group process. We also wish to thank the WVU group for their work in making this conference successful.
This year we received and reviewed over 171 preliminary, poster, contributed, and theoretical report proposals. This work required the time and energy of over 90 reviewers, who prepared evaluations and feedback for authors. We could not carry out the conference without their contribution. Thank you to the 2015 reviewers!
If you have comments and suggestions about the submission or review process, please feel free to share them with members of the planning committee (wearing blue nametags) during the conference or send them to Tim at [email protected].
Local organizers will be wearing gold “host committee” name badges, and feel free to ask any of them questions you may have about the conference or Pittsburgh. Should you have any questions, concerns, or compliments about the conference, please do not hesitate to talk to any of us. You will receive an online Conference Evaluation form after the conference and be sure to share your suggestions with us, as we’re always looking for ways to improve. Enjoy and have a wonderful conference!
Sincerely,
Nicole Engelke Tim Fukawa-Connelly Local Organizer Program Committee Chairperson
RUME 2015 Conference Proceedings and Best Paper Award Information
All authors who present at the 2015 conference will have the option of submitting a 15-page paper for publication in the RUME Conference Proceedings. All long papers will be reviewed by 2-3 reviewers and considered for the best paper award.
All long papers must follow the long paper formatting guidelines (available on the conference website under the “Guidelines” link) and will be reviewed according to the proposal review criteria.
LONG PAPER REVIEW CRITERIA
• Does the proposal explore a significant issue/questions relevant to RUME? �
• How does it relate to prior research on related topics/issues? �
• Is the theoretical perspective clearly outlined? �
• Is there an appropriate choice of research methodology? �
• Is it clear what the conclusions/main claims are? �
• Are those supported by data? �
• Does the research contribute to teaching practice/theory development? �Submission of a long paper is not required of participants but is strongly encouraged. Acceptance to the RUME Conference Proceedings is dependent upon reviewers’ recommendations. All long papers are due Sunday, March 22, 2015. �To submit a long paper, check the conference website under the “Guidelines” link: �
• Go to: https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=rume18 �
• Log into EasyChair. Note: You will need to use the login name and password you used �before to submit your proposal. �
• Click “New Submission” in the header �
• Enter the title and other information for the paper �
• Select “Proceedings Long Paper” for the paper category �
• Upload either a .doc or .docx version of your paper (do not upload a .pdf file) �Questions regarding long papers should be emailed to Tim Fukawa-Connelly, the Chair of the Program Committee, at [email protected]. �
Thursday
Friday Breakfast from 7-8:30
Saturday Breakfast from 7-8:30
8:00 AM – 12:00 PM RUME Working Group Meetings
8:35 AM – 9:05 AM Session 8 – Contributed Reports
8:35 AM – 9:05 AM Session 19 – Contributed Reports
9:15 AM – 9:45 AM Session 9 – Preliminary Reports
9:15 AM – 9:45 AM Session 20 – Preliminary Reports
9:45 AM – 10:15 AM Coffee Break
9:45 AM – 10:15 AM Coffee Break
10:15AM – 10:45 AM Session 10 – Preliminary Reports
10:15AM – 10:45 AM Session 21 – Contributed Reports
10:55 AM – 11:25 AM Session 11 – Contributed Reports
10:55 AM – 11:25 AM Session 22 – Preliminary Reports
1:00 PM – 1:15 PM Opening Session Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
11:35 AM – 12:05 PM Session 12 – Mixed Reports –4
11:35 AM – 12:05 PM Session 23 – Mixed Reports
1:25 PM – 1:55 PM Session 1 – Contributed Reports --4
12:05 – 1:05 PM Lunch Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
12:05 PM – 1:10 PM Lunch Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
2:05 PM – 2:35 PM Session 2 – Contributed Reports --4
1:05 PM – 1:35 PM Session 13 – Contributed Reports
1:10 PM – 1:40 PM Session 24 – Contributed Reports
2:35 PM – 3:05 PM Coffee Break 1:45 PM – 2:15 PM Session 14 – Contributed Reports
1:50 PM – 2:20 PM Session 25 – Contributed Reports
3:05 PM – 3:35 PM Session 3 – Contributed Reports --4
2:25 PM – 2:55 PM Session 15 – Contributed Reports
2:30 PM – 3:00 PM Session 26 – Contributed Reports
3:45 PM – 4:15 PM Session 4 – Contributed Reports 2:55 PM – 3:25 PM Coffee Break 3:00 PM – 3:30 PM Coffee Break
4:20 PM – 4:50 PM Session 5 – Preliminary Reports
3:25 PM – 3:55 PM Session 16 – Preliminary Reports
3:30 PM – 4:00 PM Session 27 – Preliminary Reports
5:00 PM – 5:30 PM Session 6 – Contributed Reports
4:05 PM – 4:35 PM Session 17 – Contributed Reports
4:10 PM – 4:40 PM Session 28 – Contributed Reports
5:40 PM – 6:10 PM Session 7 – Contributed Reports
4:45 PM – 5:15 PM Session 18 – Preliminary Reports
4:50 PM – 5:20 PM Session 29 – Contributed Reports
5:30 PM – 6:30 PM Plenary Session Dr. David Stinson Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
5:25 PM – 6:20 PM Poster Session 2 & Cash Bar Grand Foyer
6:10 PM – 7:00 PM Poster Session 1 & Reception Grand Foyer
7:00 PM – 9:30 PM Dinner & Plenary Session Dr. Peg Smith Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
6:30 PM Dinner On Your Own
6:30 PM – 9:15 PM Dinner, Awards Banquet & Plenary Session Dr. Sean Larsen Grand Ballroom Salons 2O4
THURSDAY,FEBRUARY25,20161:00-1:15pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
OPENINGSESSION
1:25-1:55pm
SESSION1–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Prospectiveteachers’evaluationsofstudents’proofsbymathematicalinduction
HyejinPark
Thisstudyexamineshowprospectivesecondaryteachersvalidateseveralproofsbymathematicalinduction(MI)fromhypotheticalstudentsandhowtheirworkwithproofvalidationsrelatestohowtheygradetheirstudents’proofs.Whenaskedtogivecriteriaforevaluatingastudent’sargument,participantswishedtoseeacorrectbasestep,inductivestep,andalgebra.However,participantsprioritizedthebasestepandinductivestepoverassessingthecorrectnessofthealgebrawhenvalidatingandgradingstudents’arguments.Alloftheparticipantsgavemorepointstoanargumentthatpresentedonlytheinductivestepthantoanargumentthatpresentedonlythebasestep.Twooftheparticipantsacceptedthestudents’argumentaddressingonlytheinductivestepasavalidproof.Furtherstudiesareneededtodeterminehowprospectiveteachersevaluatetheirstudents’argumentsbyMIifmanyalgebraicerrorsarepresent,especiallyintheinductivestep.
1Paper
MarquisB Analyzingstudents’interpretationsofthedefiniteintegralasconceptprojections
JosephF.Wagner
Thisstudyofbeginningandupper-levelundergraduatephysicsstudentsextendsearlierresearchonstudents’interpretationsofthedefiniteintegral.UsingWagner’s(2006)transfer-in-piecesframeworkandthenotionofaconceptprojection,fine-grainedanalysesofstudents’understandingsofthedefiniteintegralrevealagreatervarietyandsophisticationinsomestudents’useofintegrationthanpreviousresearchershavereported.Thedualpurposeofthisworkistodemonstrateanddeveloptheutilityofconceptprojectionsasameansofinvestigatingknowledgetransfer,andtocritiqueandbuildontheexistingliteratureonstudents’conceptionsofintegration.
9
PaperMarquisC Organizationalfeaturesthatinfluencedepartments’uptakeof
student-centeredinstruction:Casestudiesfrominquiry-basedlearningincollegemathematics
SandraLaursen
ActivelearningapproachestoteachingmathematicsandscienceareknowntoincreasestudentlearningandpersistenceinSTEMdisciplines,butdonotyetreachmostundergraduates.Tobroadlyengagecollegeinstructorsinusingtheseresearch-supportedmethodswillrequirenotonlyprofessionaldevelopmentandsupportforindividuals,buttheengagementofdepartmentsandinstitutionsasorganizations.Thisstudyexaminesfourdepartmentsthatimplementedinquiry-basedlearning(IBL)incollegemathematics,focusingonthequestion,“WhatexplicitstrategiesandimplicitdepartmentalcontextshelporhindertheuptakeofIBL?”Basedoninterviewdataanddocuments,thefourdepartmentalcasestudiesrevealstrategiesusedtosupportIBLinstructorsandengagecolleaguesnotactivelyinvolved.Comparativeanalysishighlightshowcontextualfeaturessupported(ornot)thespreadandsustainabilityoftheseteachingreforms.WeuseBolmanandDeal’s(1991)frameworktoanalyzethestructural,political,humanresourceandsymbolicelementsoftheseorganizationalstrategiesandcontexts.
Paper
62
GrandBallroom5
Aninterconnectedframeworkforcharacterizingsymbolsense
MargaretKinzel
Algebraicnotationcanbeapowerfulmathematicaltool,butnotallseemtodevelop“symbolsense,”theabilitytousethattooleffectivelyacrosssituations.Analysisofinterviewdataidentifiedthreeinterconnectedviewpoints:lookingat,with,andthroughthenotation.Theframeworkandimplicationsforinstructionwillbepresented.
Paper27
2:05-2:35pm
SESSION2–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Students’explicit,unwarrantedassumptionsin“proofs”offalseconjectures
KellyBubp
Althoughevaluating,refining,proving,andrefutingconjecturesareimportantaspectsofdoingmathematics,manystudentshavelimitedexperienceswiththeseactivities.Inthisstudy,undergraduatestudentscompletedprove-or-disprovetasksduringtask-basedinterviews.Thispaperexplorestheexplicit,unwarrantedassumptionsmadebysixstudentsontasksinvolvingfalsestatements.Ineachcase,thestudentexplicitlyassumedanexactconditionnecessaryforthestatementinthetasktobetruealthoughitwasnotagivenhypothesis.Theneedforanungivenassumptiondidnotpromptanyofthesestudentstothinkthestatementmaybefalse.Throughpromptingfromtheinterviewer,twostudentsovercametheirassumptionandcorrectlysolvedthetaskandtwostudentspartiallyovercameitbyconstructingasolutionofcases.However,twootherstudentswereunabletoovercometheirassumptions.Studentsmakingexplicit,unwarrantedassumptionsseemstoberelatedtotheirlimitedexperiencewithconjectures.
Paper
11
MarquisB Physics:Bridgingthesymbolicandembodiedworldsofmathematicalthinking
ClarissaThompson,SepidehStewartandBruceMason
Physicsspansunderstandinginthreedomains–theEmbodied(Real)World,theFormal(Laws)World,andtheSymbolic(Math)World.Expertphysicistsfluidlymoveamongthesedomains.Deep,conceptualunderstandingandproblemsolvingthriveinfluencyinallthreeworldsandthefacilitytomakeconnectionsamongthem.However,novicestudentsstruggletoembodythesymbolsorsymbolicallyexpresstheembodiments.Thecurrentresearchfocusedonhowaphysicsinstructoruseddrawingsandmodelstohelphisstudentsdevelopmoreexpert-likethinkingandmoveamongtheworlds.
Paper
41MarquisC Inquiry-basedlearninginmathematics:Negotiatingthe
definitionofapedagogy
ZacharyHaberlerandSandraLaursen
Inquiry-basedlearningisoneofthepedagogiesthathasemergedinmathematicsasanalternativetotraditionallecturinginthelasttwodecades.Thereisagrowingbodyofresearchandscholarshiponinquiry-basedlearninginSTEMcourses,aswellasagrowingcommunityofpractitionersofIBLinmathematics.However,despitethegrowthofIBLresearchandpracticeinmathematics,wideuptakeofIBLremainshamstrunginpartbythelackofasophisticateddiscussionofitsdefinition.ThispaperoffersafirststeptowardaddressingthisproblembydescribinghowagroupofIBLpractitionersdefineIBL,howtheyadoptIBLtofittheirspecificteachingneeds,andhowdifferencesindefinitionsandperceptionsofIBLhaveconstrainedandenableditsdiffusiontonewinstructors.Paper
55
GrandBallroom5
Studentresourcespertainingtofunctionandrateofchangeindifferentialequations
GeorgeKuster
Whiletheimportanceofstudentunderstandingoffunctionandrateofchangearethemesacrosstheresearchliteratureindifferentialequations,fewstudieshaveexplicitlyfocusedonhowstudentunderstandingofthesetwotopicsgrowandinterfacewitheachotherwhilestudentslearndifferentialequations.ExtendingtheperspectiveofKnowledgeinPieces(diSessa,1993)tostudentlearningindifferentialequations,thisresearchexplorestheresourcesrelatingtofunctionandrateofchangethatstudentsusetosolvedifferentialequationstasks.Thefindingsreportedhereinarepartofalargerstudyinwhichmultiplestudentsenrolledindifferentialequationswereinterviewedperiodicallythroughoutthesemester.Theresultsculminatewithtwosetsofresourcesastudentusedrelatingtofunctionandrateofchangeandimplicationsforhowtheseconceptsmaycometogethertoaffordanunderstandingofdifferentialequations.
Paper124
2:35–3:05pm
COFFEEBREAK
3:05–3:35pm
SESSION3–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Anewperspectivetoanalyzeargumentationandknowledgeconstructioninundergraduateclassrooms
KarenKeene,DerekWilliamsandCelethiaMcNeil
Usingargumentationtohelpunderstandhowlearninginaclassroomoccursisacompellingandcomplextask.Weshowhoweducationresearcherscanuseanargumentationknowledgeconstructionframework(Weinberger&Fischer,2006)fromresearchinonlineinstructiontomakesenseofthelearninginaninquiryorienteddifferentialequationsclassroom.Thelongtermgoalisseeiftherearerelationshipsamongclassroomparticipationandstudentoutcomes.Theresearchreportedhereisthefirststep:analyzingthediscourseintermsofepistemic,social,andargumentativedimensions.Theresultsshowthattheepistemicdimensioncanbebetterunderstoodbyidentifyinghowstudentsverbalizeunderstandingaboutaproblem,theconceptualspacearoundtheproblem,theconnectionsbetweenthetwoandtheconnectionstopriorknowledge.Inthesocialdimension,wecanidentifyifstudentsarebuildingontheirlearningpartners’ideas,orusingtheirownideas,andorboth.Paper
42MarquisB Prototypeimagesofthedefiniteintegral
StevenJones
Researchonstudentunderstandingofdefiniteintegralshasrevealedanapparentpreferenceamongstudentsforgraphicalrepresentationsofthedefiniteintegral.Sincegraphicalrepresentationscanpotentiallybebothbeneficialandproblematic,itisimportanttounderstandthekindsofgraphicalimagesstudentsuseinthinkingaboutdefiniteintegrals.Thisreportusestheconstructof“prototypes”toinvestigatehowalargesampleofstudentsdepicteddefiniteintegralsthroughthegraphicalrepresentation.Aclear“prototype”groupofimagesappearedinthedata,aswellasrelated“almostprototype”imagegroups.
15Paper
MarquisC Thegraphicalrepresentationofanoptimizingfunction
ReneeLarueandNicoleInfante
Optimizationproblemsinfirstsemestercalculuspresentmanychallengesforstudents.Inparticular,studentsarerequiredtodrawonpreviouslylearnedcontentandintegrateitwithnewcalculusconceptsandtechniques.Whilethiscanbedonecorrectlywithoutconsideringthegraphicalrepresentationofsuchanoptimizingfunction,wearguethatconsistentlyconsideringthegraphicalrepresentationprovidesthestudentswithtoolsforbetterunderstandinganddevelopingtheiroptimizationproblem-solvingprocess.Weexaminesevenstudents’conceptimagesoftheoptimizingfunction,specificallyfocusingonthegraphicalrepresentation,andconsiderhowthisinfluencestheirproblem-solvingactivities.Paper
93GrandBallroom5
Supportforproofasaclusterconcept:Anempiricalinvestigationintomathematicians’practice
KeithWeber
InapreviousRUMEpaper,Iarguedthatproofinmathematicalpracticecanprofitablybeviewedasaclusterconceptinmathematicalpractice.IalsooutlinedseveralpredictionsthatwewouldexpecttoholdifproofwereaclusterconceptInthispaper,Iempiricallyinvestigatetheviabilityofsomeofthesepredictions.Theresultsofthestudiesconfirmedthesepredictions.Inparticular,prototypicalproofssatisfyallcriteriaoftheclusterconceptandtheirvalidityisagreeduponbymostmathematicians.Argumentsthatsatisfyonlysomeofthecriteriaoftheclusterconceptgeneratedisagreementamongstmathematicianswithmanybelievingtheirvaliditydependsuponcontext.Finally,mathematiciansdonotagreeonwhattheessenceofproofis.
Paper116
3:45–4:15pm
SESSION4–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA AStudyofCommonStudentPracticesforDeterminingtheDomainandRangeofGraphs
PeterCho,BenjaminNorrisandDeborahMoore-Russo
Thisstudyfocusesonhowstudentsindifferentpostsecondarymathematicscoursesperformondomainandrangetasksregardinggraphsoffunctions.Studentsoftenfocusonnotableaspectsofagraphandfailtoseethegraphinitsentirety.Manystudentsstrugglewithpiecewisefunctions,especiallythoseinvolvinghorizontalsegments.FindingsindicatethatCalculusIstudentsperformedbetterondomaintasksthanstudentsinlowermathcoursestudents;however,theydidnotoutperformstudentsinlowermathcoursesonrangetasks.Ingeneral,studentperformancedidnotprovideevidenceofadeepunderstandingofdomainandrange.
Paper5
MarquisB Onsymbols,reciprocalsandinversefunctions
RinaZazkisandIgorKontorovich
Inmathematicsthesamesymbol–superscript(-1)–isusedtoindicateaninverseofafunctionandareciprocalofarationalnumber.Isthereareasonforusingthesamesymbolinbothcases?Weanalyzetheresponsestothisquestionofprospectivesecondaryschoolteacherspresentedinaformofadialoguebetweenateacherandastudent.Thedatashowthatthemajorityofparticipantstreatthesymbol☐-1asahomonym,thatis,thesymbolisassigneddifferentandunrelatedmeaningsdependingonacontext.Weexemplifyhowknowledgeofadvancedmathematicscanguideinstructionalinteraction
Paper39
MarquisC Interpretingprooffeedback:Doourstudentsknowwhatwe’resaying?
RobertC.Moore,MarthaByrne,TimothyFukawa-ConnellyandSarahHanusch
Instructorsoftenwritefeedbackonstudents’proofsevenifthereisnoexpectationforthestudentstoreviseandresubmitthework.However,itisnotknownwhatstudentsdowiththatfeedbackoriftheyunderstandtheprofessor’sintentions.Tothisend,weaskedeightadvancedmathematicsundergraduatestorespondtoprofessorcommentsonfourwrittenproofsbyinterpretingandimplementingthecomments.Weanalyzedthestudent’sresponsesthroughthelensesofcommunitiesofpracticeandlegitimateperipheralparticipation.Thispaperpresentstheanalysisoftheresponsesfromoneproof.Paper
87GrandBallroom5
Studentresponsestoinstructioninrationaltrigonometry
JamesFanning
Idiscussaninvestigationonstudents’responsestolessonsinWildberger’s(2005a)rationaltrigonometry.FirstIdetailbackgroundinformationonstudents’struggleswithtrigonometryanditsrootsinthehistoryoftrigonometry.AfterdetailingwhatrationaltrigonometryisandwhatothermathematiciansthinkofitIdescribeapre-interview,intervention,postinterviewexperiment.Inthisstudytwostudentsgothroughclinicalinterviewpertainingtosolvingtrianglesbeforeandafterinstructioninrationaltrigonometry.Thefindingsofthisstudyshowpotentialbenefitsofstudentsstudyingrationaltrigonometrybutalsohighlightpotentialdetrimentstothematerial.Paper
64:20–4:50pm
SESSION5–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Useofstrategicknowledgeinamathematicalbridgecourse:Differencesbetweenanundergraduateandgraduate
DarrylChamberlainJr.andDragaVidakovic
Theabilitytoconstructproofshasbecomeoneof,ifnotthe,paramountcognitivegoalofeverymathematicalsciencemajor.However,studentscontinuetostrugglewithproofconstructionand,particularly,withproofbycontradictionconstruction.Thispaperissituatedinalargerresearchprojectonthedevelopmentofanindividual’sunderstandingofproofbycontradictioninatransition-to-proofcourse.Thepurposeofthispaperistocompareproofconstructionbetweentwostudents,onegraduateandoneundergraduate,inthesametransition-to-proofcourse.TheanalysisutilizesKeithWeber’sframeworkforStrategicKnowledgeandshowsthatwhilebothstudentsreadilyusedsymbolicmanipulationtoprovestatements,thegraduatestudentutilizedinternalandflexibleprocedurestobeginproofsasopposedtotheexternalandrigidproceduresutilizedbytheundergraduate.Paper
7MarquisB Classifyingcombinations:Dostudentsdistinguishbetween
differenttypesofcombinationproblems?
EliseLockwood,NicholasWassermanandWilliamMcGuffey
Inthispaperwereportonasurveydesignedtotestwhetherornotstudentsdifferentiatedbetweentwodifferenttypesofproblemsinvolvingcombinations–problemsinwhichcombinationsareusedtocountunorderedsetsofdistinctobjects(anatural,commonwaytousecombinations),andproblemsinwhichcombinationsareusedtocountorderedsequencesoftwo(ormore)indistinguishableobjects(alessobviousapplicationofcombinations).Wehypothesizedthatnovicestudentsmayrecognizecombinationsasappropriateforthefirsttypebutnotforthesecondtype,andourresultssupportthishypothesis.Webrieflydiscussthemathematics,sharetheresults,andofferimplicationsanddirectionsforfutureresearch.
Paper30
MarquisC Acasestudyofdevelopingself-efficacyinwritingproofframeworks
AhmedBenkhalti,AnnieSeldenandJohnSelden
Thiscasestudydocumentstheprogressionofonenon-traditionalindividual’sproof-writingthroughasemester.Weanalyzedthevideotapesofthisindividual’sone-on-onesessionsworkingthroughourcoursenotesforaninquiry-basedtransition-to-proofcourse.Ourtheoreticalperspectiveinformedourworkwiththisindividualandincludedtheviewthatproofconstructionisasequenceof(mental,aswellasphysical)actions.Italsoincludedtheuseofproofframeworksasameansofinitiatingawrittenproof.Thisindividual’searlyreluctancetouseproofframeworks,afteraninitialintroductiontothem,wasdocumented,aswellasherlateracceptanceof,andproficiencywith,them.Bytheendofthefirstsemester,shehaddevelopedconsiderablefacilitywithboththeformal-rhetoricalandproblem-centeredpartsofproofsandasenseofself-efficacy.Paper
44GrandBallroom5
ResultsfromtheGroupConceptInventory:Exploringtheroleofbinaryoperationinintroductorygrouptheorytaskperformance
KathleenMelhuishandJodiFasteen
Binaryoperationsareanessential,butoftenoverlookedtopicinadvancedmathematics.WepresentresultsrelatedtostudentunderstandingofoperationfromtheGroupConceptInventory,aconceptuallyfocused,grouptheorymultiple-choicetest.Wepairresultsfromover400studentresponseswith30follow-upinterviewstoillustratetherolebinaryoperationunderstandingplayedintasksrelatedtoamultitudeofgrouptheoryconcepts.Weconcludebyhypothesizingpotentialdirectionsforthecreationofaholisticbinaryoperationunderstandingframework.Paper
56
CityCenterA Onlinecalculushomework:Thestudentexperience
AndrewKrause
TheMAAadvertisesthattheonlinehomeworksystemWeBWorKisusedsuccessfullyatover700collegesanduniversities,andtheinstitutionselectedformystudyhasimplementedWeBWorKuniversallyacrossallcalculuscourses.Iusedamixedmethodapproachtoexaminehowstudentsexperienceonlinecalculushomeworkinordertoprovideinsightsastohowonlinehomeworkmightbeimproved.Inparticular,Iexaminedthebehaviors,perceptions,andresourcesassociatedwithonlinehomework.Asurveywasadministeredtoallstudentsinthemainstreamcalculuscoursethatprovidesquantitativeinformationaboutgeneraltrendsandinformsfurtherquestioning.Forexample,morethanhalfofstudentsreportedthattheyneverstudycalculuswithclassmatesnorinofficehours.Intandemwiththelargesurvey,Ialsocloselystudiedtheonlinehomeworkexperienceof4studentsthroughscreenrecordingsandinterviews.Paper
68CityCenterB Students’symmetricabilityinrelationtotheiruseand
preferenceforsymmetryheuristicsinproblemsolving
MeredithMullerandEricPandiscio
Advancedmathematicalproblemsolvingismarkedbyefficientandfluiduseofmultiplesolutionstrategies.Symmetricargumentsareaptheuristicsandeminentlyusefulinmathematicsandsciencefields.Researchsuggeststhatmathematicsproficiencyiscorrelatedwithspatialreasoning.Wedefinesymmetricabilityasfluencywithmentallyvisualizing,manipulating,andmakingcomparisonsamong2Dobjectsunderrotationandreflection.Wehypothesizethatsymmetricabilityisadistinctsub-abilityofspatialreasoningwhichismoreaccessibletostudentsduetoinherentculturalbiasesforsymmetricbalance.Dostudentswithvaryinglevelsofsymmetricabilityuseorprefersymmetricargumentsinproblemsolving?Howdoessymmetricabilityrelatetoinsightinproblemsolving?Resultsfromapilotstudyindicatethat,amongundergraduates,thereishighvariationinsymmetricability.Further,studentswithhighersymmetricabilitytendtowardsmorepositiveattitudesaboutmathematics.Methods,futureresearch,andimplicationsarediscussed.
Paper49
5:00–5:30pm
SESSION6–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Waysofunderstandingandwaysofthinkinginusingthederivativeconceptinapplied(non-kinematic)contexts
StevenJones
Muchresearchonstudents’understandingofderivativesinappliedcontextshasbeendoneinkinematics-basedcontexts(i.e.position,velocity,acceleration).However,giventhewiderangeofappliedderivativesinotherfieldsofstudythatarenotbasedonkinematics,thisstudyfocusesonhowstudentsinterpretandreasonaboutappliedderivativesinnon-kinematicscontexts.Threemainwaysofunderstandingorwaysofthinkingaredescribedinthispaper,including(1)invokingtime,(2)overgeneralizationofimplicitdifferentiation,and(3)confusionbetweenderivativeexpressionandoriginalformula.
Paper31
MarquisB Graphsofinequalitiesintwovariables
KyungheeMoon
Inthisstudy,Ianalyzehowpreservicesecondaryteachersrepresentedandexplainedgraphsofthreeinequalities—alinear,acircular,andaparabolic—intwovariables.Ithensuggestnewwaystoexplaingraphsofinequalities,i.e.somealternativestothesolutiontest,basedonthepreserviceteachers’thoughtprocessesandbyincorporatingtheideaofvariation.Thesealternativesexplaingraphsofinequalitiesascollectionsofraysorcurves,whichissimilartographsoffunctionsascollectionsofpointsinonevariablefunctionsandascollectionsofcurvesintwovariablefunctions.Iconcludethestudybyapplyingthealternativestothesolvingofoptimizationproblemsanddiscussingtheimplicationsofthesealternativesforfuturepracticeandresearch.Paper
34
MarquisC Mathematicians’gradingofproofswithgaps
DavidMiller,NicoleEngelke-InfanteandKeithWeber
Inthisstudy,wepresentedninemathematicsprofessorswiththreeproofscontaininggapsandaskedtheprofessorstoassigntheproofsagradeinthecontextofatransition-to-proofcourse.Wefoundthattheparticipantsfrequentlydeductedpointsfromproofsthatwerecorrectandassignedgradesbasedontheirperceptionsofhowwellstudentsunderstoodtheproofs.Theprofessorsalsoindicatedthattheyexpectedlectureproofsinthetransition-to-proofcoursetohavethesamerigorasthosedemandedofstudents,butlectureproofscouldbelessrigorousthantherigordemandedofstudentsinadvancedmathematicscourses.Thispresentationwillfocusonparticipants’rationalesforthesebeliefs.
Paper92
6:10–6:40pm
SESSION7–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Covariationalandparametricreasoning
TeoPaolettiandKevinMoore
Researchershavearguedthatstudentscandevelopfoundationalmeaningsforavarietyofmathematicstopicsviaquantitativeandcovariationalreasoning.Weextendthisresearchbyexaminingtwostudents’reasoningthatweconjecturedcreatedanintellectualneedforparametricfunctions.Wefirstdescribeourtheoreticalbackgroundincludingdifferentconceptionsofcovariationresearchershavefoundusefulwhenanalyzingstudents’activitiesconstructingandrepresentingrelationshipsbetweencovaryingquantities.Wethenpresenttwostudents’activitiesduringateachingexperimentinwhichtheyconstructedandreasonedaboutcovaryingquantitiesandhighlightaspectsofthestudents’reasoningthatweconjecturecreatedanintellectualneedforparametricfunctions.Weconcludewithimplicationsthestudents’activitiesandreasoninghaveforfutureresearchandcurriculumdesign.Paper
20
MarquisB Re-claimingduringproofproduction
DavidPlaxco
Inthisresearch,IsetouttoelucidatetheconstructofRe-Claiming-awayinwhichstudents’conceptualunderstandingrelatestotheirproofactivity.ThisconstructemergedduringabroaderresearchprojectinwhichIanalyzeddatafromindividualinterviewswiththreestudentsfromajunior-levelModernAlgebracourseinordertomodelthestudents’understandingofinverseandidentity,modeltheirproofactivity,andexploreconnectionsbetweenthetwomodels.Eachstageofanalysisconsistedofiterativecoding,drawingongroundedtheorymethodology(Charmaz,2006;Glaser&Strauss,1967).Inordertomodelconceptualunderstanding,Idrawontheform/functionframework(Saxe,etal.,1998).IanalyzeproofactivityusingAberdein’s(2006a,2006b)extensionofToulmin’s(1969)modelofargumentation.ReflectionacrossthesetwoanalysescontributedtothedevelopmentoftheconstructofRe-Claiming,whichIdescribeandexploreinthisarticle.Paper
125MarquisC Limitationsofa"chunky"meaningforslope
CameronByerley,HyunkyoungYoonandPatrickThompson
Thispaperwillinvestigatethequestion“Whatmathematicalmeaningsdohighschoolmathematicsteachersholdforslope?”Itwillalsoinvestigatetowhatextentthesemeaningsbuildonanimageofquotientasameasureofrelativesize.Thedatacomesfromtheadministrationofthediagnosticinstrumentnamed“MeaningsforMathematicsTeachingSecondaryMath”(MMTsm).Paper
956:10–7:00pmGrandFoyer
POSTERSESSION&RECEPTION
Clearingthewayformindsetchangedthroughformativeassessment
RebeccaDibbsandJenniePatterson
OneofthereasonsfortheexodusinSTEMmajorsistheintroductorycalculuscurriculum.AlthoughthereisevidencethatcurriculalikeCLEARcalculuspromotedsignificantgainsinstudents’growthmindset,itisunclearhowthiscurriculumpromotesmindsetchanges.ThepurposeofthiscasestudywastoinvestigatewhichfeaturesofCLEARCalculuspromotedpositivechangesinstudents’mindsets.AfteradministeringthePatternsofAdaptiveLearningScaletoassessstudents’initialmindsetinonesectionofcalculus,fourstudentswereselectedforinterviews.Althoughparticipantswereselectedformaximalvariationintheirmindsetatthebeginningofthecourse,therewerealotofsimilarthemesintheirinterviews.StudentscitedthatCLEARCalculuscurriculumchallengestheminwaysthatfacilitatesdeepercomprehensivelearningthanthatofatraditionalcalculuscourse.
Paper
128 StudentinterestincalculusI
DerekWilliams
ThisreportsonasecondaryanalysisofdatacollectedbytheMathematicalAssociationofAmerica’sCharacteristicsofSuccessfulProgramsinCollegeCalculus(2015).Surveydatawerecollectedfrommorethan700instructors,androughly14,000studentsmakingthesedataidealformultiplelevelanalysistechniques(Raudenbush&Bryk,2002).Here,thesedataareusedtoanalyzestudents’interestinCalculusI.Resultssuggestthatstudentswithhigherfrequenciesofpresentingtotheirclassmates,collaboratingwithpeers,workingindividually,explainingtheirwork,andtakingCalculusIwithanexperiencedinstructortendtobemoreinterestedinclass
Paper
Usingreadingjournalsincalculus
TaraDavisandAnnelieseSpaeth
InparallelstudiesduringtheFall2015semester,weexaminedtheeffectsofassigningreadingjournalsinafirstsemestercalculuscourse.Atthebeginningofthesemester,studentsweregiveninstructionsabouthowtoreadthetextbook.Onalternatingweeks,studentswereaskedtocompletejournalassignments-theseincludedtakingreadingnotes,respondingtoapromptquestion,andreflectinguponanyconfusingportionsofthereading.Acomparisonbetweenstudentquizscoresfromweeksduringwhichjournalswereassignedandquizscoresfromweeksduringwhichnojournalswereassignedwillbegiven,andimplicationsforteachingwillbediscussed.
Paper
Enrichingstudent’sonlinehomeworkexperienceinpre-
calculuscourses:Hintsandcognitivesupports
NathanWakefieldandWendySmith
AspartofreformingourPre-Calculuscourses,werealizedthatreformstoinstructionneededtobeaccompaniedbyreformstothehomework.WeutilizedtheonlinehomeworksystemWeBWorKbutrecognizedourstudentswantedmoresupportonmissedquestions.WebWorK“hints”providedusanavenuetoaskstudentsleadingquestionstopromptthinkingoverprocedures.Preliminarydatashowmanystudentsareusingthesehintsandthehintsareworkingasintended.WeplantoexpandhintsbeyondourPre-Calculuscourses.TheopensourcenatureofWeBWorKprovidesanopportunityforhintstobeimplementedonawidescale.
Paper
134
Calculusstudents’understandingofthevertexofthequadraticfunctioninrelationtotheconceptofderivative
AnnieChildersandDragaVidakovic
ThepurposeofthisstudywastogaininsightintothirtyCalculusIstudents’understandingoftherelationshipbetweentheconceptofvertexofaquadraticfunctionandtheconceptofthederivative.APOS(action-process-object-schema)theory(Asialaetal.,1996)wasusedinanalysisonstudentwrittenwork,think-aloud,andfollowupgroupinterviews.Students’personalmeaningsofthevertex,includingmisconceptions,wereexplored,andhowstudentsrelatethevertextotheunderstandingofthederivative.Resultsgiveevidenceofstudents’lackofconnectionbetweendifferentproblemtypeswhichusethederivativetofindthevertex.Implicationsandsuggestionsforteachingaremadebasedontheresults.Futureresearchissuggestedasacontinuationtoimprovestudentunderstandingofthevertexofquadraticfunctionsandthederivative.Paper
Aninsightfromadevelopmentalmathematicsworkshop
EddieFuller,JessicaDeshler,MarjorieDarrah,XiangmingWuandMarcelaMeraTrujillo
Inthisreport,wepresentdatafrom404studentsinadevelopmentalmathematicscourseatalargeresearchuniversityandtrytobetterunderstandacademicandnon-academicfactorsthatpredicttheirsuccess.Thisworkisthefirststepinalargerprojecttounderstandwhenscience,technology,engineering,andmathematics(STEM)intendingstudentswhobeginindevelopmentalmathematicscoursesaresuccessfulandcontinuetobesuccessfulinhigher-levelmathematicscourses.Togainsomepreliminaryinsight,weanalyzeSATandACTmathematicsscoresforSTEMandnon-STEMmajorswhosucceededinourdevelopmentalmathematicscourseandalsolookatpersonalitytraitsandanxietylevelsinthesestudents.Specifically,wesoughttoanswerthefollowingquestionsforSTEMintendingstudents:(i)whatSATandACTmathematicsscorescorrelatewithsuccessindevelopmentalmathematics?and(ii)whatothernon-academicfactorspredictsuccessindevelopmentalmathematics?
Paper
138
College-educatedadultsontheautismspectrumandmathematicalthinking
JeffreyTruman
Thisstudyexaminesthemathematicallearningofadultsontheautismspectrum,currentlyorformerlyundergraduatestudents.Iaimtoexpandonpreviousresearch,whichoftenfocusesonyoungerstudentsintheK-12schoolsystem.Ihaveconductedvariousinterviewswithcurrentandformerstudents.Theinterviewsinvolvedacombinationofaskingfortheinterviewee'sviewsonlearningmathematics,self-reportsofexperiences(bothdirectlyrelatedtocoursesandnot),andsomeparticularmathematicaltasks.Ipresentsomepreliminaryfindingsfromtheseinterviewsandideasforfurtherresearch.
Paper
Colloquialmathematicsinmathematicslectures
KristenLew,VictoriaKrupnik,JoeOlsen,TimothyFukawa-ConnellyandKeithWeber
Inthisposter,wefocusonmathematicsprofessors’useofcolloquialmathematicswheretheyexpressmathematicalideasusinginformalEnglish.Weanalyzed80-minutelecturesinadvancedmathematicsfrom11differentmathematicsprofessors.Weidentifiedeachinstancewheremathematiciansexpressedamathematicalideausinginformallanguage.Intheposter,weusethisasabasistopresentcategoriesofthemetaphoricalimagesthatprofessorsusetohelpstudentscomprehendthemathematicsthattheyareteaching.
Paper
Talkingaboutteaching:Socialnetworksofinstructorsofundergraduatemathematics
NanehApkarian
TheRUMEcommunityhasfocusedonstudents’understandingsofandexperienceswithmathematics.Thisprojectshedslightonanotherpartofthehighereducationsystem–thedepartmentalculturesurroundingundergraduatemathematicsinstruction.Thispaperreportsontheinteractionsofmembersofasinglemathematicsdepartment,centeredontheirconversationsaboutundergraduatemathematicsinstruction.Socialnetworkanalysisofthisgroupshedsimportantlightontheinformalstructureofthedepartment.
Paper
Preliminarygeneticdecompositionforimplicitdifferentiation
anditsconnectionstomultivariablecalculus
SarahKerrigan
DerivativesareanimportantconceptinundergraduatemathematicsandacrosstheSTEMfields.Therehavebeenmanystudiesonstudentunderstandingofderivatives,fromgraphingderivativestoapplyingthemindifferentscientificareas.However,thereislittleresearchonhowstudentsconstructanunderstandingofmultivariablecalculusfromtheirunderstandingofsinglevariablecalculus.ThisposterusesAPOStheorytohypothesizethementalreflectionsandconstructionsstudentsneedtomakeinordertosolveandinterpretanimplicitdifferentiationproblemandexaminetheconnectionstomultivariablecalculus.Implicitdifferentiationisoftenthefirsttimestudentsareintroducedtothenotionofafunctiondefinedbytwodependentvariables,aconceptvitalinmultivariablecalculus.Investigatinghowstudentsinitiallyreconcilethisnewideaoftwovariablefunctionscanprovideknowledgeofhowstudentsthingaboutmultivariablecalculus.
Paper
PhysicsStudents'ConstructionandUseofDifferentialElementsinMultivariableCoordinateSystems
BenjaminSchermerhornandJohnThompson
Aspartofanefforttoexaminestudents’understandingofnon-Cartesiancoordinatesystemswhenusingvectorcalculusinthephysicstopicsofelectricityandmagnetism,weinterviewedfourpairsofstudents.Inonetask,developedtoforcethemtobeexplicitaboutthecomponentsofspecificcoordinatesystems,studentsconstructdifferentiallengthandvolumeelementsforanunconventionalsphericalcoordinatesystem.Whileallpairseventuallyarrivedatthecorrectelements,someunsuccessfullyattemptedtoreasonthroughsphericalorCartesiancoordinates,butrecognizedtheerrorwhencheckingtheirwork.Thissuggestsstudents’difficultywithdifferentialelementscomesfromanincompleteunderstandingofthesystems.
Paper
Supportingundergraduateteachers’instructionalchange
GeorgeKusterandWilliamHall
TeachingInquiry-orientedMathematics:EstablishingSupports(TIMES)isanNSF-fundedprojectdesignedtostudyhowwecansupportundergraduateinstructorsastheyimplementchangesintheirinstruction.Onefactorinthedisconnectbetweenthedevelopmentanddisseminationofstudent-centeredcurriculaarethechallengesthatinstructorsfaceastheyworktoimplementthesecurricularinnovations.Forinstance,researchersinvestigatingmathematicians’effortstoteachinstudent-centeredwayshaveidentifiedanumberofchallengesincluding:developinganunderstandingofstudentthinking,planningforandleadingwholeclassdiscussions,andbuildingonstudents’solutionstrategiesandcontributions.Thisresearchsuggestsacriticalcomponentneededtotakecurricularinnovationstoscale:supportsforinstructionalchange.Inthisposterweaddressourcurrentresearcheffortstosupportundergraduateteachers’instructionalchange.
Paper
RUME-andNon-RUME-trackstudents’motivationsofenrollinginaRUMEgraduatecourse
AshleyBerger,RebeccaGrider,JulianaBucher,MollieMills-Weis,FatmaBozkurt,andMilosSavic
Thepurposeofthisongoingstudyistoinvestigatestudents’motivationsintakingagraduate-levelRUMEcourse.Sevenindividualsemi-structuredinterviewswereconductedwithgraduatestudentsenrolledinaRUMEcourseatalargeMidwesternuniversitythathasaRUMEPh.D.optioninthemathematicsdepartment.Ouranalysisofthoseinterviewsutilizedtwotheoreticalframeworks:Self-DeterminationTheory(Ryan&Deci,2000)andHannula’s(2006)needsandgoalsstructure.Preliminaryanalysisoftheinterviewsindicatesthatnon-RUME-trackstudentsareextrinsically,need-motivated,whileRUME-trackstudentsareintrinsically,goal-motivatedwhentakingaRUMEcourse.Theresearchersconjecturethatknowingwhatinfluencesnon-RUME-trackstudentsmayaidinclosingthegapbetweenthemathematicalandRUMEcommunities.
Paper
Teachingandlearninglinearalgebraintermsofcommunityof
practice
DenizKardesBirinci,KarenBogardGivvinandJamesW.Stigler
Communitiesofpractice(CoP)aredefinedasgroupsofpeoplewhoshareaconcern,asetofproblems,orapassionaboutatopic,andwhointeractinanongoingbasistodeepentheirknowledgeandexpertise.Thepurposeofthisstudyistoexaminetheprocessofteachingandlearninglinearalgebrawithinthistheoreticalframework.Inthisresearch,weusedanethnographiccasestudydesigntostudythreelinearalgebrainstructorsandtheirstudentsatalargepublicuniversity.Theinstructorshavedifferenteducationalandculturalbackgrounds.Dataincludedobservations,aLinearAlgebraQuestionnaire,andsemi-structuredinterviews.Weobservedsignificantdifferencesinteachingmethodsbetweentheinstructors.
Paper
Usingthechainruletodevelopsecondaryschoolteachers’MathematicalKnowledgeforTeaching,focusedontherateofchange
ZareenRahman,DebasmitaBasu,KarmenYuandAminataAdewumi
Theunitdescribedinthisstudywasdesignedtoconnectsecondaryandadvancedmathematicaltopics.Itfocusedonhowtheknowledgeofchainruleimpactssecondaryteachers’understandingandteachingofrateofchangesothattheycanaddressstudents’misconceptions.ThisprojectisinformedbytheideaofMathematicalKnowledgeforTeaching,whichencompassesbothsubject-matterknowledgeandpedagogicalcontentknowledgeofteachers.Thegoalwastoenhancesecondaryschoolteachers’teachingoftherateofchangeandtheunitfeaturedtasksconnectingrateofchangeproblemsasseeninhighschoolalgebratotheconceptofchainrule.Theunitwasdesignedtoengagemathematicsteachersindiscourseaboutthecontentlearnedatthecollegeleveltocontentthatistaughtatthesecondaryschoollevel.
Paper
Exploringthefactorsthatsupportlearningwithdigitally-
deliveredactivitiesandtestingincommunitycollegealgebra
ShandyHaukandBryanMatlen
Avarietyofcomputerizedinteractivelearningplatformsexist.Mostincludeinstructionalsupportsintheformofproblemsets.Feedbacktousersrangesfrom“Correct!”tooffersofhintsandpartiallytofullyworkedexamples.Behind-the-scenesdesignofsuchsystemsvariesaswell–fromstaticdictionariesofproblemsto“intelligent”andresponsiveprogrammingthatadaptsassignmentstousers’demonstratedskills,timing,andanarrayofotherlearningtheory-informeddatacollectionwithinthecomputerizedenvironment.Thisposterpresentsbackgroundondigitallearningcontextsandinviteslivelyconversationwithattendeesontheresearchdesignofastudyaimedatassessingthefactorsthatinfluenceteachingandlearningwithsuchsystemsincommunitycollegeelementaryalgebraclasses.
Paper
Whatwouldtheresearchlooklike?Knowledgeforteachingmathematicscapstonecoursesforfuturesecondaryteachers
ShandyHauk,EricHsuandNatashaSpeer
MathematicsCapstoneCourseResourcesisa14-monthproof-of-conceptdevelopmentproject.Collaboratorsacrossthreesitesaimto:(1)developandpilottwomulti-mediaactivitiesforadvancedpre-servicesecondarymathematicsteacherlearning,(2)createguidanceforcollegemathematicsfacultyforeffectiveuseofthematerialswithtargetaudiences,and(3)gatherinformationfrominstructorsandstudentstoinformfutureworktodevelopadditionalmodulesandtoguidesubsequentresearchontheimplementationofthematerials.Thegoalofthisposterpresentationistoprovideinformationaboutcapstonemoduledevelopmentandbrainstormresearchdesignsuggestionswiththelongtermaimofdevelopingagrantproposaltoresearchtheknowledgecollegemathematicsfacultyusetoeffectivelyteachmathematicstofutureteachers.
Paper
Students’experiencesandperceptionsofaninquiry-based
modelofsupplementalinstructionforcalculus
KarmenYu
TheInquiry-BasedInstructionalSupport(IBIS)workshopmodelispartofaninnovativedegreeprogramdesignedtoprepareelementarymathematicsteachers.ThereasonbehindIBISworkshopswastosupportstudentsenrolledin“historicallydifficult”mathematicscourses,suchasCalculusIandCalculusII.ThedesignofIBISworkshopwasframedandguidedbyPeer-LedTeamLearning(PLTL)(Gosser&Roth,1998)andComplexInstruction(Cohen,1994).Duringworkshop,studentsworkinsmallgroupsandengagein“groupworthy”mathematicaltasksthatpromotetheirconceptualunderstandingofCalculustopics(Cohen,1994).Apilotstudywasconductedtoevaluatetheworkshopstructureandthesetasks.Inordertoassessstudents’workshopexperiences,follow-upinterviewswereconducted.Students’responsesindicatedthattheirworkshopexperienceshelpedtopromotethedevelopmentoftheirproblemsolvingskillsandhighlightedthecriticalrolesofthinkingandreasoninginlearningCalculuswithunderstanding.
Paper
Anoverviewofresearchonthearithmeticmeaninuniversityintroductorystatisticscourses
SamCook
Thereisadearthofresearchonthearithmeticmeanattheuniversitylevel.Thisposterwillcoveroverlapofseveralstudies(someunpublished)onuniversitystudents’understandingofthemeananduniversitystatisticsinstructors’beliefsabouttheirstudents’understandingsofthemean.
Paper
Reasoningaboutchanges:aframeofreferenceapproach
SuraniJoshua
InaRUME18TheoreticalReportmyco-authorsandIpresentedourcognitivedescriptionofaconceptualizedframeofreference,consistingofmentalcommitmentstounits,referencepoints,anddirectionalityofcomparisonwhenthinkingaboutmeasures.HereIpresentapilotstudyonhowafocusonconceptualizingaframeofreferenceimpactsstudents’abilitytoreasonquantitativelyaboutchanges.Thetwo-partempiricalstudyconsistedofclinicalinterviewswithseveralstudentsfollowedbyteachinginterviewswiththreestudentschosenbecauseoftheirvaryingabilitiestoconceptualizeaframeofreference.Myinitialevidenceshowsthattheabilitytoconceptualizeaframeofreferencegreatlybenefitsstudentsastheyattempttoreasonwithchanges.
Paper
7:00–9:30pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
DINNERANDPLENARY
PegSmith
FRIDAY,FEBRUARY26,20168:35–9:05am
SESSION8–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Developmentalmathematicsstudents’useofrepresentationstodescribetheinterceptsoflinearfunctions.
AnneCawley
Thispaperreportsfindingsfromapilotstudythatinvestigatedthewaythatsixcollegestudentsenrolledinadevelopmentalworkshopworkedthroughataskofnineproblemsonlinearfunctions.Specifically,Iinvestigatedtwoaspects,theorderthatstudentscompletedtheproblemsandwhatsourcesofinformationthestudentsusedtofindtherequestedfeatures,andalsothetypesofrepresentations(symbolic,graphical,ornumerical)studentsusedtodescribetheinterceptsofthefunction.Findingssuggestthatstudentshaveanoverwhelmingrelianceonthegraphofthelinearfunctionandthatthereisvariationinthenumberofrepresentationsusedtodescribetheintercepts(Single,Transitional,andMultiUsers).Becausethegraphicalrepresentationisapreferredrepresentation,itmaybewisetobuildstudentknowledgefromthisrepresentation,makingconnectionstootherrepresentations.Thisstudycontributestounderstandingthemathematicalknowledgethatdevelopmentalmathematicsstudentsbringtotheclassroom.Paper
24MarquisB Acasestudyofamathematicteachereducator’suseof
technology
KevinLaforest
Theuseoftechnologyinmathematicsclassroomsremainsanimportantfocusinmathematicseducationduetotheproliferationoftechnologyinsocietyandalagintheimplementationoftechnologyinclassrooms.Inthispaper,Ipresentdatafromclinicalinterviewswithamathematicsteachereducator(MTE)andobservationsfromthatMTE’sclassinordertodiscusshisuseoftechnology.Specifically,IdescribethreethemesthatemergedfromtheMTE’stechnologyuseandhowtheyrelatetohisepistemologicalstance.Thesethemesare:(a)hisdevelopingaclassroomenvironmentaroundtheuseoftechnology,(b)technologyprovidingapreciseanddynamicenvironment,and(c)hisusingtechnologytohelpengenderstudents’mentalimagery.Finally,Idiscusshowtheideasemergingfromthispapercanbehelpfulforthemathematicseducationcommunity.Paper
72
MarquisC Exampleconstructioninthetransition-to-proofclassroom
SarahHanusch
Accuratelyconstructingexamplesandcounterexamplesisanimportantcomponentoflearninghowtowriteproofs.Thisstudyinvestigateshowoneinstructorofatransition-to-proofcoursetaughtstudentstoconstructexamples,andhowherstudentsreactedtotheinstruction.
Paper
1009:15–9:45am
SESSION9–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Perturbingpractices:Theeffectsofnoveldidacticobjectsoninstruction
KrystenPampel
Theadvancementoftechnologyhassignificantlychangedthepracticesofnumerousprofessions,includingteaching.Whenaschoolfirstadoptsanewtechnology,establishedclassroompracticesareperturbed.Theseperturbationscanhavebothpositiveandnegativeeffectsonteachers’abilitiestoteachmathematicalconceptswiththenewtechnology.Therefore,beforenewtechnologycanbeintroducedintomathematicsclassrooms,weneedtobetterunderstandhowtechnologyeffectsinstruction.Usinginterviewsandclassroomobservations,Iexploredperturbationsinclassroompracticeasaninstructorimplementednoveldidacticobjects.Inparticular,theinstructorwasusingdidacticobjectsdesignedtolaythefoundationfordevelopingaconceptualunderstandingofrationalfunctionsthroughthecoordinationofrelativemagnitudesofthenumeratoranddenominator.Theresultsareorganizedaccordingtoaframeworkthatcapturesleaderactions,communication,expectationsoftechnology,roles,timing,studentengagement,andmathematicalconceptions.
Paper
8
MarquisB Investigatingstudent-learninggainsfromvideolessonsinaflippedcalculuscourse
CassieWilliamsandJohnSiegfried
Theflippedclassroomhasgarneredattentioninpost-secondarymathematicsinthepastfewyears,butmuchoftheresearchonthismodelhasbeenonstudentperceptionsratherthanitseffectontheattainmentoflearninggoals.Insteadofcomparingtoa“traditional”model,inthisstudyweinvestigatedstudent-learninggainsintwoflippedsectionsofCalculusI.Inthissession,wewillfocusonthequestionofdetermininglearninggainsfromdeliveringcontentviavideooutsideoftheclassroom.Inparticular,wewillcomparestudent-learninggainsafterwatchingmoreconceptualvideosversusmoreproceduralones.Wewillsharequalitativeandquantitativedatagatheredfromsurveysandquizzes,aswellasresultsfromin-classassessments.
Paper
17MarquisC Students’formalizationofpre-packagedinformalarguments
MelissaMillsandDovZazkis
Wegavepairsofstudentsenrolledinagraduateanalysisclasstasksinwhichtheywereprovidedwithavideotapedinformalargumentforwhyaresultheldandaskedtoproducearigorousproofofthisresult.Thisprovidedalensintostudents’formalizationprocessandthevariousrolestheseinformalargumentsplayedineachpair’sprovingprocess.Comparingacrossseveralpairsofparticipantsrevealed3distinctrolesinformalargumentscanplayinproving,1)solelyasastartingpoint,2)asareferencethatcanbecontinuallyreturnedtoduringtheprovingprocess,and3)asaconvincingargumentthatdoesnotinformtheprovingprocess.Paper
43
GrandBallroom5
Students’PerceptionsofLearningCollegeAlgebraOnlineusingAdaptiveLearningTechnology
LoriOgden
Adaptivelearningtechnologywasusedintheteachingofanonlinecollegealgebracourse.Asstudentsworkedonthemasterygoalssetforthem,thetechnologyhelpedstudentsidentifycontentthattheyalreadyunderstoodandothercontentthattheyhadyettomaster.Goalorientationtheorysuggeststhatwhenlearningismastery-oriented,astudent’smotivationtolearnmayimprove(Ames&Archer,1988).Qualitativemethodologywasusedtodescribehowstudentsperceivedtheinstructionoftheircollegealgebracourseandtheirlearninginthecourse.Preliminaryfindingssuggestedthatanadaptiveteachingapproachmayhelpbuildstudents’confidencebecausetheycancontrolthepaceofinstructionandchosewheretofocustheireffortwithoutdrawingnegativeattentiontothemselves.
Paper
57CityCenterA Effectofemphasizingadynamicperspectiveontheformal
definitionoflimit
JeremySylvestreandWilliamHackborn
Weattempttodeterminetheefficacyofusinganalternate,equivalentformulationoftheformaldefinitionofthelimitinafirst-yearuniversitycalculuscourseinaidingtheunderstandingofthedefinitionandofalleviatingthedevelopmentofcommonmisconceptionsconcerningthelimit.
Paper
60
CityCenterB Elicitingmathematicians’pedagogicalreasoning
ChristineAndrews-Larson,ValeriePetersonandRachelKeller
GiventheprevalenceofworkintheRUMEcommunitytoexaminestudentthinkinganddevelopinstructionalmaterialsbasedonthisresearch,weargueitisimportanttodocumentthewaysinwhichundergraduatemathematicsinstructorsmakesenseofthisresearchtoinformtheirownteaching.WedrawonHorn’snotionofpedagogicalreasoninginordertoanalyzevideorecordedconversationsofovertwentymathematicianswhoelectedtoattendaworkshoponinquiry-orientedinstructionatalargenationalmathematicsconference.Inthiscontext,weexaminethequestions:(1)Howdoundergraduatemathematicsinstructorsengageineffortstomakesenseofinquiry-orientedinstruction?(2)Howdoesvariationinfacilitationrelatetoinstructors’reasoningabouttheseissues?Preliminaryfindingssuggestthatdifferencesinfacilitationrelatetohowparticipantsengagedinthemathematics,andthatthenatureofparticipants’engagementwiththemathematicswasrelatedtotheirsubsequentpedagogicalreasoning.
Paper85
9:45–10:15am
COFFEEBREAK
10:15–10:45am
SESSION10–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Doesitconverge?Alookatsecondsemestercalculusstudents'strugglesdeterminingconvergenceofseries
DavidEarlsandEyobDemeke
Despitethemultitudeofresearchthatexistsonstudentdifficultyinfirstsemestercalculuscourses,littleisknownaboutstudentdifficultydeterminingconvergenceofsequencesandseriesinsecondsemestercalculuscourses.Inourpreliminaryreport,weattempttoaddressthisgapspecificallybyanalyzingstudentworkfromanexamquestionthatasksstudentstodeterminetheconvergenceofaseries.Wedevelopaframeworkthatcanbeusedtohelpanalyzethemistakesstudentsmakewhendeterminingtheconvergenceofseries.Inaddition,weanalyzehowstudenterrorsrelatetoprerequisitestheyareexpectedtohaveenteringthecourse,andhowtheseerrorsareuniquetoknowledgeaboutseries.
Paper108
MarquisB Anexampleofalinguisticobstacletoproofconstruction:Doriandthehiddendoublenegative
AnnieSeldenandJohnSelden
Thispaperconsidersthedifficultythatuniversitystudents’mayhavewhenunpackinganinformallywordedtheoremstatementintoitsformalequivalentinordertounderstanditslogicalstructure,andhence,constructaproof.ThissituationisillustratedwiththecaseofDoriwhoencounteredjustsuchadifficultywithahiddendoublenegative.Shewastakingatransition-to-proofcoursethatbeganbyhavingstudentsfirstproveformallyworded“if-then”theoremstatementsthatenabledthemtoconstructproofframeworks,andthereby,makeinitialprogressonconstructingproofs.Butlater,studentswerepresentedwithsomeinformallywordedtheoremstatementstoprove.Wegoontoconsiderthequestionofwhen,andhow,toenculturatestudentsintotheofteninformalwaythattheoremstatementsarenormallywritten,whilestillenablingthemtoprogressintheirproofconstructionabilities.Paper
63MarquisC Studentcharacteristicsandonlineretention:Preliminary
investigationoffactorsrelevanttomathematicscourseoutcomes
ClaireWladis,AlyseHacheyandKatherineConway
Thereisevidencethatstudentsdropoutathigherratesfromonlinethanface-to-facecourses,yetitisnotwellunderstoodwhichstudentsareparticularlyatriskonline.Inparticular,onlinemathematics(andotherSTEM)courseshavenotbeenwell-studiedinthecontextoflarger-scaleanalysesofonlinedropout.Thisstudysurveyedonlineandface-to-facestudentsfromalargeU.S.universitysystem.Resultssuggestthatforonlinecoursesgenerally,gradesaresignificantpredictorsofdifferentialonlineversusface-to-faceperformanceandthatstudentparentsmaybeparticularlyvulnerabletopooronlinecourseoutcomes.Native-bornstudentswerealsovulnerableonline.Thenextstageofthisresearchwillbetoanalyzethefactorsthatarerelevanttoonlineversusface-to-faceretentioninmathematics(andotherSTEM)coursesspecifically.
Paper69
GrandBallroom5
Studentinterpretationandjustificationof“backward”definiteintegrals
VickiSealeyandJohnThompson
Thedefiniteintegralisanimportantconceptincalculus,withapplicationsthroughoutmathematicsandscience.Studiesofstudentunderstandingofdefiniteintegralsrevealseveralstudentdifficulties,someofwhicharerelatedtodeterminingthesignofanintegral.Clinicalinterviewsof5studentsgleanedtheirunderstandingof“backward”definiteintegrals,i.e.,integralsforwhichthelowerlimitisgreaterthantheupperlimitandthedifferentialisnegative.StudentsinitiallyinvokedtheFundamentalTheoremofCalculustojustifythenegativesign.SomestudentseventuallyaccessedtheRiemannsumappropriatelybutcouldnotdeterminehowtoobtainanegativequantitythisway.Weseetheprimaryobstaclehereasinterpretingthedifferentialasawidth,andthusanunsignedquantity,ratherthanadifferencebetweentwovalues.
Paper80
CityCenterA Divergentdefinitionsofinquiry-basedlearninginundergraduatemathematics
SamuelCook,SarahMurphyandTimFukawa-Connelly
Inquiry-basedlearningisbecomingmoreimportantandwidelypracticedinundergraduatemathematicseducation.Asaresult,researchaboutinquiry-basedlearningissimilarlybecomingmorecommon,includingquestionsoftheefficacyofsuchmethods.Yet,thusfar,therehasbeenlittleeffortonthepartofpractitionersorresearcherstocometoadescriptionoftherange(s)ofpracticethatcanorshouldbeunderstoodasinquiry-basedlearning.Asaresult,studies,comparisonsandcritiquescanbedismissedasnotusingtheappropriatedefinition,withoutadjudicatingthequalityoftheevidenceorimplicationsforresearchandteaching.Throughalarge-scaleliteraturereviewandsurveyingofexpertsinthecommunity,thisstudybeginstheconversationaboutpossibleareasofagreementthatwouldallowforaconstituentdefinitionofinquiry-basedlearningandallowfordifferentiationwithnon-inquirypedagogicalpractices.
Paper88
CityCenterB IVTasastartingpointformultiplerealanalysistopics
SteveStrand
TheproofoftheIntermediateValueTheorem(IVT)providesarichandapproachablecontextformotivatingmanyconceptscentraltorealanalysis,suchas:sequenceandfunctionconvergence,completenessoftherealnumbers,andcontinuity.Asapartofthedevelopmentoflocalinstructionaltheory,anRME-baseddesignexperimentwasconductedinwhichtwopost-calculusundergraduatestudentsdevelopedtechniquestoapproximatetherootofapolynomial.Theythenadaptedthosetechniquesintoa(rough)proofoftheIVT.
Paper118
10:55–11:25am
SESSION11–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA SymbolizingandBrokeringinanInquiryOrientedLinearAlgebraClassroom
MichelleZandieh,MeganWawroandChrisRasmussen
Thepurposeofthispaperistoexploretheroleofsymbolizingandbrokeringinfosteringclassroominquiry.Wecharacterizeinquirybothasstudentinquiryintothemathematicsandinstructor’sinquiryintothestudents’mathematics.Disciplinarypracticesofmathematicsarethewaysthatmathematiciansgoabouttheirprofessionandincludepracticessuchasconjecturing,defining,symbolizing,andalgorithmatizing.Inthispaperwepresentexamplesofstudentsandtheirinstructorengaginginthepracticeofsymbolizinginfourways.Weintegratethisanalysiswithdetailregardinghowtheinstructorservesasabrokerbetweentheclassroomcommunityandthebroadermathematicalcommunity.
Paper98
MarquisB Mathematicians’ideaswhenformulatingproofinrealanalysis
MelissaTroudt
Thisreportpresentssomefindingsfromastudythatinvestigatedtheideasprofessionalmathematiciansfindusefulindevelopingmathematicalproofsinrealanalysis.Thisresearchsoughttodescribetheideasthemathematiciansdevelopedthattheydeemedusefulinmovingtheirargumentstowardafinalproof,thecontextsurroundingthedevelopmentoftheseideasintermsofDewey’stheoryofinquiry,andtheevolvingstructureofthepersonalargumentutilizingToulmin’sargumentationscheme.Threeresearchmathematicianscompletedtasksinrealanalysisthinkingaloudininterviewandat-homesettingsandtheirworkwascapturedviavideoandLivescribetechnology.TheresultsofopeniterativecodingaswellastheapplicationofDewey’sandToulmin’sframeworkswerethreecategoriesofideasthatemergedthroughthemathematicians’purposefulrecognitionofproblemstobesolvedandtheirreflectiveandevaluativeactionstosolvethem.Paper
114MarquisC Reinventingthemultiplicationprinciple
EliseLockwoodandBranwenSchaub
Countingproblemsofferopportunitiesforrichmathematicalthinking,yetstudentsstruggletosolvesuchproblemscorrectly.Inanefforttobetterunderstandstudents’understandingofafundamentalaspectofcombinatorialenumeration,wehadtwoundergraduatestudentsreinventastatementofthemultiplicationprincipleduringaneight-sessionteachingexperiment.Inthispresentation,wereportonthestudents’progressionfromanascenttoasophisticatedstatementofthemultiplicationprinciple,andwehighlighttwokeymathematicalissuesthatemergedforthestudentsthroughthisprocess.Weadditionallypresentpotentialimplicationsanddirectionsforfurtherresearch.Paper
1611:35–12:05pm
SESSION12–MIXEDREPORTS
MarquisA Resultsfromanationalsurveyofabstractalgebrainstructors:Mathedissolvingproblemstheydon'thave
TimFukawa-Connelly,EstrellaJohnsonandRachelKeller
Thereissignificantinterestfrompolicyboardsandfundingagenciestochangestudents’experiencesinundergraduatemathematicsclasses.Abstractalgebraspecificallyhasbeenthesubjectofreforminitiatives,includingnewcurriculaandpedagogies,sinceatleastthe1960s;yetthereislittleevidenceaboutwhetherthesechangeinitiativeshaveprovensuccessful.Pursuanttoansweringthisquestion,weconductedasurveyofabstractalgebrainstructorstogenerallyinvestigatetypicalpractices,andmorespecifically,theirknowledge,goals,andorientationstowardsteachingandlearning.Onaverage,moderatelevelsofsatisfactionwerereportedwithregardtothecourseitselforstudentoutcomes;moreover,littleinterestin,orknowledgeof,reformpracticesorcurriculawereidentified.Wefoundthat77%ofrespondentsspendthemajorityofclasstimelecturing–notsurprisingwhenconsidering82%reportedthebeliefthatlectureisthemosteffectivewaytoteach.
Paper
122MarquisB Investigatingamathematicsgraduatestudent’sconstructionof
ahypotheticallearningtrajectory
AshleyDuncan
Thisstudyreportsresultsofhowateacher’smathematicalmeaningsandinstructionalplanningdecisionstransformedwhileparticipatinginandthengeneratingahypotheticallearningtrajectoryonangles,anglemeasureandtheradiusasaunitofmeasurement.Usingateachingexperimentmethodology,aninitialclinicalinterviewwasdesignedtorevealtheteacher’smeaningsforanglesandanglemeasureandtogaininformationabouttheteacher’sinstructionalplanningdecisions.TheteacherparticipatedinaresearchergeneratedHLTdesignedtopromotetheconstructionofproductivemeaningsforanglesandanglemeasureandthenconstructedherownHLTforherstudents.TheinitialinterviewrevealedthattheteacherhadseveralunproductivemeaningsforanglesandanglemeasurethatcausedtheteacherperturbationswhileparticipatinginthetasksoftheresearchergeneratedHLT.Thisparticipationallowedhertoconstructdifferentmeaningsforanglesandanglemeasurewhichchangedherinstructionalplanningdecisions.
Paper
117
MarquisC Ontheaxiomaticformalizationofmathematicalunderstanding
DanielCheshire
Thisstudyadoptsaproperty-basedperspectivetoinvestigatetheformsofabstraction,instantiation,andrepresentationusedbyundergraduatetopologystudentswhenactingtounderstandandusetheconceptofacontinuousfunctionasitisdefinedaxiomatically.Basedonaseriesoftask-basedinterviews,profilecasesarebeingdevelopedtocompareandcontrastthedistinctwaysofthinkingandprocessesofunderstandingobservedbystudentsundergoingthistransition.Aframeworkhasbeenestablishedtointerprettheparticipants’interactionswiththeunderlyingmathematicalpropertiesofcontinuousfunctionswhiletheyreconstructedtheirconceptimagestoreflectatopological(axiomatic)structure.Thiswillprovideinsightintohowsuchpropertiescanbesuccessfullyincorporatedintostudents’conceptimagesandaccessed;andwhichobstaclespreventthis.Preliminaryresultsrevealseveralcoherentcategoriesofparticipants’progressionofunderstanding.Thisreportwilloutlinetheseprofilesandseekcriticalfeedbackonthedirectionofthedescribedresearch.Paper
101GrandBallroom5
Strugglingtocomprehendthezero-productproperty
JohnPaulCook
Thezero-productproperty(ZPP),typicallystatedas‘ifab=0thena=0orb=0,’isanimportantpropertyinschoolalgebra(asatechniqueforsolvingequations)andabstractalgebra(asthedefiningcharacteristicofintegraldomains).WhilethestrugglesofsecondarymathematicsstudentstoemploytheZPParewell-documented,itunclearhowundergraduatestudentspreparingtotakeabstractalgebraunderstandtheZPPastheyenterabstractalgebra.Tothisend,thispaperdocumentsstudents’understandingoftheZPPwhilealsoinvestigatinghowstudentsmightbeabletodevelopandharnesstheirownintuitiveunderstandingsoftheproperty.Preliminaryfindings,inadditiontocharacterizinghowstudentsreasonwithandunderstandtheZPP,indicatethattheZPPisnolesstrivialforadvancedundergraduatestudentsthanitisforsecondarymathematicsstudent�
Paper
102
12:05–1:05pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
LUNCH
1:05–1:35pm
SESSION13–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Examiningstudentattitudesandmathematicalknowledgeinsidetheflippedclassroomexperience
MatthewVoigt
Flippedclassroomsorhybridonlinecoursesarebecomingincreasinglyprevalentattheundergraduatelevelasinstitutionsseekcost-savingmeasureswhilealsodesiringtoimplementtechnologicalinnovationstoattract21stcenturylearners.Thisstudyexaminedundergraduatepre-calculusstudents’(N=427)experiences,attitudesandmathematicalknowledgeinaflippedclassroomformatcomparedtostudentsinatraditionallectureformat.Ourinitialresultsindicatestudentsintheflippedformatweremorepositiveabouttheiroverallclassroomexperiences,weremoreconfidentintheirmathematicalabilities,weremorewillingtocollaboratetosolvemathematicalproblems,andachievedslighthighergainsinmathematicalknowledge.Contrarytopriorresearch,thisstudyindicatedthatamajorityofstudentsintheflippedclassroomwouldtaketheclassagaininthesameformat,butofconcernisthegenderdisparity,indicatingthatfemalestudentsaremuchmorelikelytoresisttakingaclassinaflippedformat.
Paper26
MarquisB Students’meaningsofa(potentially)powerfultoolforgeneralizingincombinatorics
EliseLockwoodandZackeryReed
Inthispaperweprovidetwocontrastingcasesofstudentworkonaseriesofcombinatorialtasksthatweredesignedtofacilitategeneralizingactivity.Thesecontrastingcasesoffertwodifferentmeanings(Thompson,2013)thatstudentshadaboutwhatmightexternallyappeartobethesametool–ageneraloutcomestructurethatbothstudentsspontaneouslydeveloped.Byexaminingthestudents’meanings,weseewhatmadethetoolmorepowerfulforonestudentthantheotherandwhataspectsofhiscombinatorialreasoningandhisabilitytogeneralizepriorworkwereefficacious.Weconcludewithimplicationsanddirectionsforfurtherresearch.
Paper66
MarquisC FrameworkforMathematicalUnderstandingforSecondaryTeaching:AMathematicalActivityperspective
M.KathleenHeidandPatriciaWilson
Aframeworkformathematicalunderstandingforsecondaryteachingwasdevelopedfromanalysisofthemathematicsinclassroomevents.TheMathematicalActivityperspectivedescribesthemathematicalactionsthatcharacterizethenatureofthemathematicalunderstandingthatsecondaryteacherscouldproductivelyuse.Paper
781:45–2:15pm
SESSION14–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Integratingoralpresentationsinmathematicscontentcoursesforpre-serviceteachers
SayonitaGhoshHajraandAbeerHasan
Inthispaperwereportonastudyofassessment-basedoralpresentationtasksinamathematicscontentcourseforpre-serviceteachersatapublicuniversityinthewesternUnitedStates.Weusedstatisticalinferencetotestforthesignificanceoftheobservedimprovementinpre-serviceteachers’attitudestowardsusingoralpresentationtasksintheirmathematicallearningandtowardsteacherpreparation.Ourresultssuggestthatuseoforalpresentationimprovespre-serviceteachers’attitudesandbeliefstowardsmathematicslearning.Moreover,responsestothepost-presentationquestionnaireprovideinsightsonthebenefitsofusingoralpresentationtasksinmathematicscoursesforpre-serviceteachers.
Paper4
MarquisB Gender,switching,andstudentperceptionsofCalculusI
JessicaEllisandRebeccaCooper
Weanalyzesurveydatatoexplorehowstudents’reportedperceptionsoftheirCalculusIexperiencesrelatetotheirgenderandpersistenceincalculus.Wedrawfromstudentfree-responsesfromuniversitiesinvolvedinacomprehensiveUSnationalstudyofCalculusI.Weperformathematicanalysisonthedata,identifyingquantitativepatternswithinthemesandanalyzedstudentresponsestobetterunderstandthesepatterns.Ouranalysesindicatethatfemalestudentsreportnegativeaffecttowardsthemselvesmoreoftenthanmales,andthatfemalestudentsdiscusstheirhighschoolpreparationdifferentlythanmales.Wediscusshowthesepotentialfactorsmayinfluencestudentpersistenceincalculus.
Paper76
MarquisC Mary,Mary,isnotquitesocontrary:Unlessshe’swearingHilbert’sshoes
StacyBrown
Researchers(Leron,1985;Harel&Sowder,1998)havearguedthatstudents’lackapreferenceforindirectproofsandhavearguedthatthelackofpreferenceisduetoapreferenceforconstructivearguments.Recentempiricalresearch(author,2015),however,whichemployedacomparativeselectiontaskinvolvingadirectproofandanindirectproofofthecontrapositionform,foundnoevidenceofalackofpreferenceforindirectproof.Recognizingthatindirectproofsofthecontradictionformmaydifferfromthosethatemploythecontraposition,thisstudydocumentsstudents’proofpreferencesandselectionrationaleswhenengaginginacomparativeselectiontaskinvolvingadirectproofandanindirectproofofthecontradictionform.
Paper
812:25–2:55pm
SESSION15–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Graphinghabits:“Ijustdon’tlikethat”
KevinMoore,TeoPaoletti,IrmaStevensandNatalieHobson
Students’waysofthinkingforgraphsremainanimportantfocusinmathematicseducationduetoboththeprevalenceofgraphicalrepresentationsinthestudyofmathematicsandthepersistentdifficultiesstudentsencounterwithgraphs.Inthisreport,wedrawfromclinicalinterviewstoreportwaysofthinking(orhabits)undergraduatestudentsmaintainforassimilatinggraphs.Inparticular,wecharacterizeaspectsintrinsictostudents’waysofthinkingforgraphsthatinhibitedtheirabilitytorepresentcovariationalrelationshipstheyconceivedtoconstitutesomephenomenonorsituation.Asanexample,weillustratethatstudents’waysofthinkingforgraphswerenotproductivefortheirrepresentingarelationshipsuchthatneitherquantity’svalueincreasedordecreasedmonotonically.
Paper
2MarquisB TheEffectofMathematicsHybridCourseonStudents’
MathematicalBeliefs
Kuo-LiangChang,RoxanneBrinkerhoffandEllenBackus
Computer-basedcourses(e.g.,onlineorhybrid)havesignificantlychangedthedesignofpedagogyandcurriculuminthepastdecade,whichincludeonlineteachingandlearningonmathematicseducation.Asbeliefsplayanessentialroleonachievement,theimpactofcomputer-basedcoursesonmathematicalbeliefsisstillunderdeveloped.Inparticular,weareinterestedinwhethermathematicshybridclass(blendofonlineandface-to-face)hasdifferentimpactonstudents’mathematicalbeliefscomparedtoregularface-to-faceclass.Atwo-by-twodesignofinstructionmethod(hybridvs.regular)andmathematicsperformance(highvs.low)wasemployed.Theresultsshowedthatbothhybridandregularclassstudentsbelievedunderstandingandmemorizationwereequallyimportantinmathematicslearning.Hybridclassstudentsshowedmoreflexibilityinselectingsolutionmethodscomparedtoregularclassstudentsontheirbeliefsaboutproblemsolving.Paper
13
MarquisC Usingtheeffectsizesofsubtaskstocompareinstructionalmethods:Anetworkmodel
GarryJohns,ChristopherNakamuraandCurtisGrosse
Networkshavebecomeincreasinglyimportantinstudyingairpollution,energyuse,geneticsandpsychology.Thesedirectedgraphsalsohavefeaturesthatmaybeusefulinmodelingstudentlearningbyansweringquestionssuchasthefollowing:Howcanwedetermineifoneteachingapproachhasbetteroutcomesthanasecondmethod?Inthispaperwepresentaframeworkfordividinganapproachintosubtasks,assigninganumericalvalue(suchasaneffectsize)toeachsubtaskandthencombiningthesevaluestodetermineanoveralleffectivenessratingfortheoriginalapproach.Thisprocessallowsresearcherstoinvestigatepotentialcausesforstudentachievementratherthansimplecorrelations,andcancomparetheeffectivenessofamethodforvarioustypesofstudentsorinstructors.
Paper18
2:55–3:25pm
COFFEEBREAK
3:25–3:55pm
SESSION16–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Effectofteacherpromptsonstudentproofconstruction
MargaretMorrowandMaryShepherd
Manystudentshavedifficultylearningtoconstructmathematicalproofs.Inanupperlevelmathematicscourseusinginquirybasedmethods,whilethisissomeresearchonthetypesofverbaldiscourseinthesecourses,thereislittle,ifany,researchonteachers’writtencommentsonstudents’work.Thispaperpresentssomeverypreliminaryresultsfromongoinganalysisfromoneteacher’swrittenpromptsonstudents’roughdraftsofproofsforanAbstractAlgebracourse.TheteacherpromptswillinitiallybeanalyzedthroughaframeworkproposedbyBlanton&Stylianou(2014)forverbaldiscourseandtheframeworkwillbemodifiedinthecourseoftheanalysis.Canweunderstandifatypeofpromptis“better”insomesenseingettingstudentstoreflectontheirworkandrefinetheirproofs?Itisanticipatedthatteacherpromptsintheformoftransactivequestionsaremoreeffectiveinhelpingstudentsconstructproofs.Paper
64
MarquisB Secondaryteachersconfrontingmathematicaluncertainty:Reactionstoateacherassessmentitemonexponents
HeejooSuh,HeatherHowellandYvonneLai
Teachingisinherentlyuncertain,andteachingsecondarymathematicsisnoexception.Wetaketheviewthatuncertaintycanpresentopportunityforteacherstorefinetheirpractice,andthatundergraduatemathematicalpreparationforsecondaryteachingcanbenefitfromengagingpre-serviceteachersintaskspresentinguncertainty.Weexamined13secondaryteachers’reactionstomathematicaluncertaintywhenengagedwithconceptsaboutextendingthedomainfortheoperationofexponentiation.Thedataaredrawnfromaninterview-basedstudyofitemsdevelopedtoassessmathematicalknowledgeforteachingatthesecondarylevel.Inourfindings,wecharacterizewaysinwhichteacherseitherdeniedormathematicallyinvestigatedtheuncertainty.PotentialimplicationsforinstructorsincludeusingmathematicaluncertaintytoprovideanopportunityforundergraduatestolearnbothcontentandpracticesoftheCommonCoreStateStandards.Theproposalconcludeswithquestionsaddressinghowundergraduatemathematicsinstructorscoulduseuncertaintyasaresourcewhenteachingpreserviceteachers.
Paper70
MarquisC Students’conceptimageoftangentlinecomparedtotheirunderstandingofthedefinitionofthederivative
BrittanyVincentandVickiSealey
Ourresearchexploresfirst-semestercalculusstudents'understandingoftangentlinesandthederivativeconceptthroughaseriesofthreeinterviewsconductedoverthecourseofonesemester.UsingacombinationofZandieh's(2000)derivativeframeworkandTallandVinner's(1981)notionsofconceptimageandconceptdefinition,ouranalysisexaminestherolethatstudents'conceptimageoftangentlinesplaysintheirconceptualunderstandingofthederivativeconcept.Preliminaryresultsseemtoindicatethatstudentsaremoresuccessfulwhentheirconceptimageoftangentincludesthelimitingpositionofsecantlines,asopposedtoatangentlineasthelinethattouchesthecurveatonepoint.Paper
89
GrandBallroom5
Unraveling,synthesizingandreweaving:Approachestoconstructinggeneralstatements.
DuaneGraysay
Learningprogressionsforthedevelopmentoftheabilitytolookforandmakeuseofmathematicalstructurewouldbenefitfromunderstandinghowstudentsinmathematics-focusedmajorsmightconstructsuchstructuresintheformofgeneralstatements.Theauthorrecruitedtenuniversitystudentstointerviewsfocusedontasksthataskedforthereconstructionofageneralstatementtoaccommodateabroaderdomain.Throughcomparativeanalysisofresponses,fourmajorcategoriesofapproachestosuchtaskswereidentified.Thispreliminaryreportdescribesinbriefthosefourcategories.
Paper102
CityCenterA Studentconceptionsofdefiniteintegrationandaccumulationfunctions
BrianFisher,JasonSamuelsandAaronWangberg
Priorresearchhasshownseveralcommonstudentconceptualizationsofintegrationamongundergraduates.Thisreportfocusesondatafromawrittenassessmentofstudents’viewsondefiniteintegrationandaccumulationfunctionstocategorizestudentconceptualizationsandreportontheirprevalenceamongtheundergraduatepopulation.Analysisoftheseresultsfoundfourcategorizationsforstudentdescriptionsofdefiniteintegrals:antiderivative,area,aninfinitesumofonedimensionalpieces,andalimitofapproximations.Whenaskedaboutanaccumulationfunction,studentresponsesweregroupedintothreecategorizations:thosebasedontheprocessofcalculatingasingledefiniteintegral,thosebasedontheresultofcalculatingadefiniteintegral,andthosebasedontherelationshipbetweenchangesintheinputandoutputvariablesoftheaccumulationfunction.Theseresultswerecollectedaspartofalargerstudyonstudentlearninginmultivariablecalculus,andtheimplicationsoftheseresultsonmultivariablecalculuswillbeconsidered.Paper
113
CityCenterB SupportingstudentsinseeingsequenceconvergenceinTaylorseriesconvergence
JasonMartin,MatthewThomasandMichaelOehrtman
VirtualmanipulativesdesignedtoincreasestudentunderstandingoftheconceptsofapproximationbyTaylorpolynomialsandconvergenceofTaylorserieswereusedincalculuscoursesatmultipleinstitutions.225studentsrespondedtotasksrequiringgraphingTaylorpolynomials,graphingTaylorseries,anddescribingrelationshipsbetweendifferentnotionsofconvergence.Wedetailsignificantdifferencesobservedbetweenstudentswhousedvirtualmanipulativesandthosethatdidnot.WeproposethattheuseofthesevirtualmanipulativespromotesanunderstandingofTaylorseriessupportinganunderstandingconsistentwiththeformaldefinitionofpointwiseconvergence.Paper
1154:05–4:35pm
SESSION17–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Ontheuseofdynamicanimationstosupportstudentsinreasoningquantitatively
GrantSander
Thisstudyaddressesthewell-documentedissuethatstudentsstruggletowritemeaningfulexpressionsandformulastorepresentandrelatethevaluesofquantitiesinappliedproblemcontexts.Indevelopinganonlineintervention,wedrewfromresearchthatrevealedtheimportanceofandprocessesinvolvedinconceptualizingquantitativerelationshipstosupportstudentsinconceptualizingandrepresentingquantitativerelationshipsinappliedproblemcontexts.Theresultssuggestthattheuseofdynamicanimationswithpromptsthatfocusstudents’attentiononconceptualizingandrelatingquantitiescanbeeffectiveinsupportingstudentsinconstructingmeaningfulexpressionstorepresentthevalueofonequantityintermsofanother,andformulastodefinehowtwoco-varyingquantitieschangetogether.
Paper12
MarquisB Inquiry-orientedinstruction:Aconceptualizationoftheinstructionalthecomponentsandpractices
GeorgeKusterandEstrellaJohnson
Inthispaperweprovideacharacterizationofinquiry-orientedinstruction.Webeginwithadescriptionoftherolesofthetasks,thestudents,andtheteacherinadvancingthemathematicalagenda.Wethenshiftourfocustofourmaininstructionalcomponentsthatarecentraltocarryingouttheseroles:Generatingstudentwaysofreasoning,Buildingonstudentcontributions,Developingasharedunderstanding,andConnectingtostandardmathematicallanguageandnotation.Eachofthesefourcomponentsisfurtherdelineatedintoatotalofeightpractices.ThesepracticesaredefinedandexemplifiedbydrawingontheK-16researchliterature.Asaresult,thisconceptualizationofinquiry-orientedinstructionmakesconnectionsacrossresearchcommunitiesandprovidesacharacterizationthatisnotlimitedtoundergraduate,secondary,orelementarymathematicseducation.Theultimategoalforthisworkistoserveasatheoreticalfoundationforameasureofinquiry-orientedinstruction.Paper
45MarquisC Designresearchoninquiry-basedmultivariablecalculus:
Focusingonstudents’argumentationandinstructionaldesign
OhNamKwon,YounggonBaeandKukHwanOh
Inthisstudy,researchersdesignandimplementaninquiry-basedmultivariablecalculuscoursetoenhancestudents’argumentationinmathematicaldiscussions.Thisresearchaimstounderstandthestudents’argumentationinproofconstructionsactivities,andtoderivethecharacteristicsofthreesitesofintervention:instructionaldesign,classroominteraction,andtheinstructor’srole.Overthecourseof14weeks,18freshmenmathematicseducationmajorsparticipatedinthisstudy.Multiplesourcesofdatawerecollected,students’reasoningintheclassroomdiscussionswereanalyzedwithintheToulmin’sargumentationstructure,andtheinstructionalinterventionsweregraduallyrevisedaccordingtotheiterativecyclicprocessofthedesignresearch.Thestudents’argumentationstructurespresentedintheclassroomgraduallydevelopedintomorecomplicatedformsasthestudyprogressed,andtheresearchersconcludethattheinterventionswereeffectiveatimprovingstudents’arguments.Paper
674:45–5:15pm
SESSION18–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA ThecaseofanundergraduatemathematicscohortofAfricanAmericanmalesstrivingformathematicalexcellence
ChristopherJett
HistoricallyBlackCollegesandUniversities(HBCUs)provideadifferentmilieuasitpertainstosupportingstudentsacademicallyinalldisciplines,andthisstudychampionsanHBCUeffortwithinthecontextofundergraduatemathematics.Specifically,ithighlightsthecaseofacohortof16AfricanAmericanmalemathematicsmajorsatanall-maleHBCU.Theoverarchingresearchquestionsoughttodelvedeeperintotheseparticipants’educationalexperiences.Usingqualitativeresearchmethodsgroundedincriticalracetheory,preliminarydatashowthattheseAfricanAmericanmalemathematicsmajorswereaffirmedraciallyandmathematicallyintheirundergraduatemathematicsspace.Paper
74MarquisB Developinganopen-endedlinearalgebraassessment:initial
findingsfromclinicalinterviews
MuhammadHaider,KhalidBouhjar,KellyFindley,RubyQueaandChristineAndrews-Larson
Theprimarygoalofthisstudywastodesignandvalidateaconceptualassessmentinundergraduatelinearalgebracourse.Weworktowardthisgoalbyconductingsemi-structuredclinicalinterviewswith8undergraduatestudentswhowerecurrentlyenrolledorhadpreviouslytakenlinearalgebra.Wetrytoidentifythevarietyofwaysstudentsreasonedabouttheitemswiththeintentofidentifyingwaysinwhichtheassessmentmeasuredorfailedtomeasurestudents’understandingoftheintendedtopics.StudentswereinterviewedwhiletheycompletedtheassessmentandinterviewdatawasanalyzedbyusingananalyticaltoolofconceptimageandconceptdefinitionofTallandVinner(1981).Weidentifiedtwothemesinstudents’reasoning:thefirstthemeinvolvesstudentsreasoningaboutspanintermsoflinearcombinationsofvectors,andthesecondoneinvolvesstudentsstrugglingtoresolvethenumberofvectorsgivenwiththenumberofentriesineachvector.
Paper75
MarquisC Exploringtensions:Leanne’sstoryofsupportingpre-servicemathematicsteacherswithlearningdisabilities
RobynRuttenberg-RozenandAmiMamolo
Thispaperpresentsacasestudyofamathematicsteachereducator,Leanne,andherstoryoftryingtosupportthedevelopmentoftwopre-serviceelementaryschoolteacherswithrecognizedlearningdisabilities.Weanalyzedatathroughalensofmathematicalknowledgeforteaching,focusinginparticularonconcernsandtensionsabout(i)maintainingacademicrigorwhilemeetingtheemotional,cognitiveandpedagogicalneedsofherstudents,(ii)seeminglyopposingpedagogiesbetweenspecialeducationandmathematicseducationpractices,and(iii)equitableopportunitiesforteacherswithdisabilitiesandtheconsequencesfortheirpotentialpupils.WeofferananalysisofLeanne’spersonalstruggle,highlightingimplicationsforteachereducationandofferingrecommendationsforfutureresearch.
Paper83
GrandBallroom5
TheComplementofRUME:What'sMissingFromOurResearch?
NatashaSpeerandDaveKung
TheResearchinUndergraduateMathematicsEducation(RUME)communityhasgeneratedasubstantialliteraturebaseonstudentthinkingaboutideasintheundergraduatecurriculum.However,notalltopicsinthecurriculumhavebeentheobjectofresearch.ReasonsforthisincludetherelativelyyoungageofRUMEworkandthefactthatresearchtopicsarenotnecessarilydrivenbythecontentoftheundergraduatecurriculum.Whattopicsremainlargelyuntouched?Wegiveapreliminaryanalysis,withaparticularfocusonconceptsinthestandardcalculussequence.Usesforthiskindofanalysisoftheliteraturebaseintheeducationofnoviceresearchersandpotentialfuturedirectionsforfurtheranalysesarediscussed.
Paper86
CityCenterA Exploringpre-serviceteachers’mentalmodelsofdoingmath
BenWescoatt
Thispreliminarystudyexploresthementalmodelspre-serviceteachersholdofdoingmath.Mentalmodelsarecognitivestructurespeopleusewhilereasoningabouttheworld.Thementalmodelsrelatedtomathematicswouldinfluenceateacher’spedagogicaldecisionsandthusinfluencethementalmodelofmathematicsthattheirstudentswouldconstruct.Inthisstudy,pre-serviceelementaryteachersdrewimagesofmathematiciansdoingmathandofthemselvesdoingmath.Usingcomparativejudgements,theyselectedanimagethatbestrepresentedamathematiciandoingmath.Mostimagesofmathematiciansdoingmathwereofamaninfrontofablackboardfilledwithmathematicalsymbols.Themathematiciansappearedhappy.Incontrast,manyimagesofparticipantsshowedthemtobeunhappyorinconfusedstates.Thepreliminaryresultssuggestthattheirsharedmentalmodelofdoingmathisnaïveandshapedbylimitedexperienceswithmathematicsintheclassroom.Paper
90CityCenterB ‘It’snotanEnglishclass’:Iscorrectgrammaranimportantpart
ofmathematicalproofwritingattheundergraduatelevel?
KristenLewandJuanPabloMejia-Ramos
Westudiedthegenreofmathematicalproofwritingattheundergraduatelevelbyaskingmathematiciansandundergraduatestudentstoreadsevenpartialproofsbasedonstudent-generatedworkandtoidentifyanddiscussusesofmathematicallanguagethatwereoutoftheordinarywithrespecttowhattheyconsideredstandardmathematicalproofwriting.Preliminaryresultsindicatetheuseofcorrectgrammarisnecessaryinproofwriting,butnotalwaysaddressedintransition-to-proofcourses.
Paper
1035:30–6:30pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
PLENARYSESSION
DavidStinson
6:30pm DINNERONYOUROWNSATURDAY,FEBRUARY21,20158:35–9:05am
SESSION19–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA AdaptationsoflearningglasssolutionsinundergraduateSTEMeducation
ShawnFirouzian,ChrisRasmussenandMatthewAnderson
OneofthemainissuesSTEMfacultyfaceispromotingstudentsuccessinlarge-enrollmentclasseswhilesimultaneouslymeetingstudents’andadministrators’demandsfortheflexibilityandeconomyofonlineandhybridclasses.TheLearningGlassisaninnovativenewinstructionaltechnologythatholdsconsiderablepromiseforengagingstudentsandimprovinglearningoutcomes.Inthisreportwesharetheresultsofanefficacystudybetweenanonlinecalculus-basedphysicscourseusingLearningGlasstechnologyandalargeauditorium-stylelecturehalltaughtviadocumentprojector.Bothcoursesweretaughtwiththesameinstructorusingidenticalcontent,includingexamsandhomework.Ourquasi-experimentaldesigninvolvedidenticalpre-andpost-courseassessmentsevaluatingstudents’attitudesandbehaviortowardsscienceandtheirconceptuallearninggains.Resultsarepromising,withequivalentlearninggainsforallstudents,includingminorityandeconomicallydisadvantagedstudents.Paper
65MarquisB Pre-serviceteachers'meaningsofarea
SayonitaGhoshHajra,BetsyMcNealandDavidBowers
Anexploratorystudywasconductedofpre-serviceteachers’understandingofareaatapublicuniversityinthewesternUnitedStates.Forty-threepre-serviceteacherstookpartinthestudy.Theirdefinitionsofareaandtheirresponsestoarea-unitstaskswererecordedthroughoutthesemester.Wefoundawidegapbetweenpre-serviceteachers’meaningofareaandtheiruseofarea-units.Initially,pre-serviceteachershadweakdefinitionsofarea.Overthesemester,thesedefinitionswererefined,butmisconceptionsaboutareaandarea-unitswereilluminatedinactivitiesinvolvingnon-standardunitsandareasofirregularregions.Weconcludethat,despitedetailedmodelsofchildren’sunderstandingofarea,muchworkisneededtounderstandthelearningtrajectoriesofpre-serviceteachers,particularlywhenmisconceptionsexist.
Paper
33
MarquisC Personificationasalensintorelationshipswithmathematics
DovZazkisandAmiMamolo
Personificationistheattributionofhumanqualitiestonon-humanentities(Inagaki&Hatano,1987).Elicitingpersonificationasaresearchmethodtakesadvantageofanaturallyoccurringmeansthroughwhich(some)peoplediscussthenuancedemotionalrelationshipstheyhavewiththoseentities.Inthispaper,weintroducetheelicitingpersonificationmethodforexploringindividuals’imagesofmathematics,aswellasdiscussaninitialsetofapproachesforanalyzingtheresultingdata.Datafrombothpre-serviceteachersandresearchmathematiciansarediscussedinordertoillustratethemethod.Paper
359:15–9:45am
SESSION20–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Calculusstudents'understandingoflogicalimplicationanditsrelationshiptotheirunderstandingofcalculustheorems
JoshuaCaseandNatashaSpeer
Inundergraduatemathematics,deductivereasoningisanimportantskillforlearningtheoreticalideasandisprimarilycharacterizedbytheconceptoflogicalimplication.Thisplaysroleswhenevertheoremsareapplied,i.e.,onemustfirstcheckifatheorem’shypothesesaresatisfiedandthenmakecorrectinferences.Incalculus,studentsmustlearnhowtoapplytheorems.However,mostundergraduateshavenotreceivedinstructioninpropositionallogic.Howdothesestudentscomprehendtheabstractnotionoflogicalimplicationandhowdotheyreasonconditionallywithcalculustheorems?Resultsfromourstudyindicatedthatstudentsstruggledwithnotionsoflogicalimplicationinabstractcontexts,butperformedbetterwhenworkingincalculuscontexts.Strategiesstudentsused(successfullyandunsuccessfully)werecharacterized.Findingsindicatethatsomestudentsuse“examplegenerating”strategiestosuccessfullydeterminethevalidityofcalculusimplications.Backgroundoncurrentliterature,resultsofourstudy,furtheravenuesofinquiry,andinstructionalimplicationsarediscussed.
Paper28
MarquisB Service-learninginaprecalculusclass:Tutoringimprovesthecourseperformanceofthetutor.
EkaterinaYurasovskaya
Wehaveintroducedanexperiment:aspartofaPrecalculusclass,universitystudentshavebeentutoringalgebraprerequisitestostudentsfromthecommunityviaanacademicservice-learningprogram.Thegoaloftheexperimentwastoimproveuniversitystudents’masteryofbasicalgebraandtoquantitativelydescribebenefitsofservice-learningtostudents’performanceinmathematics.Attheendoftheexperiment,weobserved59%decreaseofbasicalgebraicerrorsbetweenexperimentalandcontrolsections.Thesetupandanalysisofthestudyhavebeeninformedbythetheoreticalresearchonservice-learningandpeerlearning,bothgroundedintheconstructivisttheoryofJohnDewey.Paper
46MarquisC Howwellpreparedarepreserviceelementaryteacherstoteach
earlyalgebra?
FundaGonulates,LeslieNaborsOlah,HeejooSuh,XueyingJiandHeatherHowell
Thisstudyaimstoinvestigateundergraduatepreserviceteachers’knowledgeinthedomainofearlyalgebra.Weconducted90-minuteclinicalinterviewswith15preserviceteachersintheirfourthyearofafive-yearteacherpreparationprogram.Theseinterviewsessionscollectedpreserviceteachers’responsestoaseriesofassessmentitemsdesignedtomeasuretheircontentknowledgeforteachingearlyalgebra,withfollowupquestionsprobingtheircontent-basedreasoning.Wealsocollectedself-reportoftheirpreparationinthiscontentarea.Wefoundthattheparticipantshaddifficultyontheitemstargetingthemeaninganduseofoperationalpropertiesandalsoinevaluatingtheappropriateuseoftheequalsignwhenpresentedwithdifferentusesinstudentwork.Theyreportedthattheyhadfewopportunitiestolearnaboutearlyalgebraasmathematicalcontentandasatopictoteach.Thesefindingscaninformthedevelopmentofteacher-educationcurriculaandsupportmaterials.
Paper79
GrandBallroom5
Undergraduatestudentsproof-readingstrategies:Acasestudyatoneresearchinstitution
EyobDemekeandMateuszPacha-Sucharzewski
Weber(2015)identifiedfiveeffectiveproof-readingstrategiesthatundergraduatestudentsinproof-basedcoursescanusetofacilitatetheirproofcomprehension.FollowingWeber’s(2015)study,wedesignedasurveystudytoexaminehowundergraduatestudents’proof-readingstrategiesrelatetowhatproficientlearnersofmathematics(mathematicsprofessorsandgraduatestudentsinmathematics)sayundergraduatesshouldemploywhenreadingproofs.Ourpreliminaryfindingsare:(i)MajorityoftheprofessorsinourstudyclaimedthatundergraduatesshouldusethestrategiesidentifiedinWeber’s(2015)study,(ii)Professors’responsesignificantlydifferedfromundergraduates’inonlytwoofthefiveproof-readingstrategiesdescribedinWeber’s(2015)study(attemptingtoprovetheorembeforereadingitsproofandillustratingconfusingassertionswithexamples),andfinally(iii)Undergraduatestudents,forthemostpart,tendtoagreewiththeirprofessors’preferredproof-readingstrategies.Paper
106CityCenterA Beyondprocedures:Quantitativereasoninginupper-division
MathMethodsinPhysics
MichaelLoverude
Manyupper-divisionphysicscourseshaveasgoalsthatstudentsshould‘thinklikeaphysicist.’Whilethisisnotwell-defined,mostwouldagreethatthinkinglikeaphysicistincludesquantitativereasoningskills:consideringlimitingcases,dimensionalanalysis,andusingapproximations.However,thereisoftenrelativelylittlecurricularsupportforthesepracticesandmanyinstructorsdonotassessthemexplicitly.Aspartofaprojecttoinvestigatestudentlearninginmathmethods,wehavedevelopedanumberofwrittenquestionstestingtheextenttowhichstudentsinanupper-divisioncourseinMathematicalMethodsinPhysicscanemploytheseskills.Althoughtherearelimitationstoassessingtheseskillswithwrittenquestions,theycanprovideinsighttotheextenttowhichstudentscanapplyagivenskillwhenprompted.Paper
112
CityCenterB Acaseforwholeclassdiscussions:Twocasestudiesoftheinteractionbetweeninstructorroleandinstructorexperiencewitharesearch-informedcurriculum
AaronWangberg,ElizabethGire,BrianFisherandJasonSamuels
Thispaperpresentscasestudiesoftwoinstructorsimplementingaresearchinformedmultivariablecalculuscurriculum.Theanalysis,structuredaroundsocialconstructivistconcepts,focusesontheinteractionsbetweentherolesoftheinstructorinfacilitatingstudentdiscussionsandtheinstructors’experienceswiththeactivities.Thisstudyisapartofanefforttoevaluateandimprovetheproject’seffectivenessinsupportinginstructorsinimplementingtheactivitiestopromoterichdiscussionswithandamongstudents.Wefindtheseinstructorstobefocusedontheirrolesasfacilitatorsforstudent-centeredsmall-groupdiscussionandthattheychoosenottohaveofwholeclassdiscussions.Wearguethatinitiatingwholeclassdiscussionswouldaddressconcernsandnegativeexperiencesreportedbytheinstructors.Paper
1099:45–10:15am
COFFEEBREAK
10:15–10:45am
SESSION21–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Aframeworkforexaminingthe2-Dand3-Dspatialskillsneededforcalculus
NicoleEngelke,MarjorieDarrahandKristenMurphy
HavingwelldevelopedspatialskillsiscriticaltosuccessinmanySTEMfieldssuchasengineering,chemistry,andphysics;theseskillsareequallycriticalforsuccessinmathematics.Wepresentaframeworkforexamininghowspatialskillsaremanifestedinmathproblems.Weexamineestablishedspatialskillsdefinitionsandcorrelatethemwiththespatialskillsneededtosuccessfullysolveastandardcalculusproblem–findthevolumeofasolidofrevolution.Thisproblemisdeconstructedintostepsandanalyzedaccordingtowhat2-Dand3-Dspatialskillsarenecessarytovisualizetheproblem.Theresultsofapilotstudyinwhichweexaminethespatialskillsthatfirstsemestercalculusstudentspossessarepresentedalongwiththepotentialimplicationsthestudents’skilllevelcouldbringtobearontheproblem.Weconcludewithsuggestionsforremediationofthesespatialskillsinthecalculusclassroomanddirectionsforfutureresearch.Paper
29
MarquisB Waysinwhichengaginginsomeoneelse’sreasoningisproductive
NanehApkarian,ChrisRasmussen,HayleyMilbourne,TommyDreyfus,XuefenGaoandMatthewVoigt
Typicalgoalsforinquiry-orientedmathematicsclassroomsareforstudentstoexplaintheirreasoningandtomakesenseofothers’reasoning.Inthispaperweofferaframeworkforinterpretingwaysinwhichengaginginthereasoningofsomeoneelseisproductiveforthepersonwhoislistening.Theframeworkistheresultofanalysisof10individualproblem-solvinginterviewswith10mathematicseducationgraduatestudentsenrolledinamathematicscontentcourseonchaosandfractals.Thetheoreticalgroundingforthisworkistheemergentperspective(Cobb&Yackel,1996),whichviewsmathematicalprogressasaprocessofactiveindividualconstructionandaprocessofmathematicalenculturation.Theframeworkcapturestherelationshipbetweenengagingwithanother’sreasoning,decentering,elaboratingjustifications,andrefining/enrichingconceptions.
25
PaperMarquisC Transforminggraduatestudents’meaningsforaveragerateof
change
StacyMusgraveandMarilynCarlson
Thisreportoffersabriefconceptualanalysisofaveragerateofchange(AROC)andsharesevidencethatevenmathematicallysophisticatedmathematicsgraduatestudentsstruggletospeakfluentlyaboutAROC.Weofferdatafromclinicalinterviewswithgraduateteachingassistantswhoparticipatedinatleastonesemesterofaprofessionaldevelopmentinterventiondesignedtosupportmathematicsgraduatestudentsindevelopingdeepandconnectedmeaningsofkeyideasofprecalculuslevelmathematicsaspartofabroaderinterventiontosupportmathematicsgraduatestudentsinteachingideasofprecalculusmathematicsmeaningfullytostudents.Theresultsrevealedthatthepost-interventiongraduatestudentsdescribeAROCmoreconceptuallythantheirpre-interventioncounterparts,butmanystillstruggletoverbalizeameaningforAROCbeyondaveragespeed,ageometricinterpretationbasedontheslopeofasecantline,oracomputation.
Paper
9710:55–11:25am
SESSION22–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Supportinginstitutionalchange:Atwo-prongedapproachrelatedtograduateteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopment
JessicaEllis,JessicaDeshlerandNatashaSpeer
Graduatestudentsteachingassistants(GTAs)areresponsibleforteachingalargepercentageofundergraduatemathematicscoursesandmanyofthemwillgoontocareersaseducators.However,theyoftenreceiveminimaltrainingfortheirteachingresponsibilities,andasaresultoftenarenotsuccessfulasteachers.Inresponse,thereisincreasednationalinterestinimprovingthewaymathematicsdepartmentspreparetheirGTAs.Inthisreport,wesharetheinitialphasesofjointworkaimedatsupportinginstitutionsindevelopingorimprovingaGTAprofessionaldevelopment(PD)program.WereportonfindingsfromanalysesofabaselinesurveydesignedtoprovideinsightsintothecharacteristicsofcurrentGTAPDprogramsintermsoftheircontent,formatandduration.ResultsindicatethattherearemanyinstitutionsseekingimprovementstotheirGTAPDprogram,andthattheirneedsareinlinewiththechangestrategiesthatthejointprojectsareemploying.
Paper37
MarquisB Whystudentscannotsolveproblems:Anexplorationofcollegestudents'problemsolvingprocessesbystudyingtheirorganizationandexecutionbehaviors
KedarNepal
Thisqualitativestudyinvestigatesundergraduatestudents’mathematicalproblemsolvingprocessesbyanalyzingtheirglobalplansforsolvingtheproblems.Thestudentsinthreeundergraduatecourseswereaskedtowritetheirglobalplansbeforetheystartedtosolveproblemsintheirin-classquizzesandexams.Theexecutionbehaviorsoftheirglobalplansandtheirsuccessorfailureinproblemsolvingwereexploredbyanalyzingtheirsolutions.Onlystudentworkthatusedclearandvalidplanswasanalyzed,usingqualitativetechniquestodeterminethesuccess(orfailure)ofstudents’problemsolving,andalsotoidentifythefactorsthatwerehinderingstudents’effortstosolveproblemssuccessfully.Manycategoriesofstudenterrorswereidentified,andhowthoseerrorsaffectedstudents’problemsolvingeffortswillbediscussed.ThisstudyisbasedonGarofaloandLester’s(1985),andalsoSchoenfeld’s(2010)frameworks,whichconsistofsomecategoriesofactivitiesorbehaviorsthatareinvolvedwhileperformingamathematicaltask.Paper
40
MarquisC Supportingpreserviceteachers’useofconnectionsandtechnologyinalgebrateachingandlearning
ErynStehrandHyunyiJung
TheConferenceBoardoftheMathematicalSciencesrecentlyadvocatedformakingconnectionsandincorporatingtechnologyinsecondarymathematicsteachereducationprograms,butprogramsacrosstheUnitedStatesincorporatesuchexperiencestovaryingdegrees.Thisstudyexplorespreservicesecondarymathematicsteachers’opportunitiestoexpandtheirknowledgeofalgebrathroughconnectionsandtheuseoftechnologyandtolearnhowtousebothtosupportteachingandlearningofalgebra.Weexploretheresearchquestion:WhatopportunitiesdosecondarymathematicsteacherpreparationprogramsprovideforPSTstolearnaboutconnectionsandencountertechnologiesinlearningalgebraandlearningtoteachalgebra?WeexaminedatacollectedfromfiveteachereducationprogramschosenfromacrosstheU.S.Ourdatasuggestnotallsecondarymathematicsteacherpreparationprogramsintegrateexperienceswithmakingconnectionsofdifferenttypesandusingtechnologytoenhancelearningacrossmathematicsandmathematicseducationcourses.Wepresentoverallfindingswithexemplars.
Paper59
GrandBallroom5
EquityinDevelopmentalMathematicsStudents’AchievementataLargeMidwesternUniversity
KennethBradfield
Withsomanystudentsenteringcollegeunderpreparedforthemainstreamsequenceofmathematicscourses,mathematicsdepartmentscontinuetoofferdevelopmentalorremedialcourseswithinnovativemethodsofdelivery.Inordertosupportallstudentsintheircollegeeducation,researcherscontinuetoinvestigatetheeffectivenessofundergraduateremediationprogramswithmixedresults.ThispaperprovidesquantitativedatafromanNSF-fundedprojectfromalargeMidwesternuniversityoverthreeyearsofadevelopmentalmathematicscourse.Pre-andpost-measuresshowthatbothurbanandAfrican-Americanstudentsbenefitedthemostfromsupplementalinstructionincontrasttotheonline-onlyformat.Basedontheseresults,Iofferrecommendationsforundergraduatemathematicsdepartmentstosupportequitableopportunitiesforallstudentsensuringasuccessfuldevelopmentalmathematicsprogram.Paper
104
CityCenterB Mathematicians’rationalforpresentingproofs:Acasestudyofintroductoryabstractalgebraandrealanalysiscourses
EyobDemekeandDavidEarls
Proofsareessentialtocommunicatemathematicsinupper-levelundergraduatecourses.Inaninterviewstudywithninemathematicians,Weber(2012)describesfivereasonsforwhymathematicianspresentproofstotheirundergraduatestudents.FollowingWeber’s(2012)study,wedesignedamixedstudytospecificallyexaminewhatmathematicianssayundergraduatesshouldgainfromtheproofstheyreadorseeduringlectureinintroductoryabstractalgebraandrealanalysis.Ourpreliminaryfindingssuggestthat:(i)Asignificantnumberofmathematicianssaidundergraduatesshouldgaintheskillsneededtorecognizevariousprooftypeandprovingtechniques,(ii)consistentwithWeber’s(2012)findings,onlyonemathematiciansaidundergraduatesshouldgainconvictionfromproofs,andfinally(3)somemathematicianspresentedproofforreasonsnotdescribedinWeber’s(2012)studysuchastohelptheirstudentsdevelopappreciationforrigor.Paper
110CityCenterA Studentperformanceonproofcomprehensiontestsin
transition-to-proofcourses
JuanPabloMejiaRamosandKeithWeber
Aspartofaprojectaimedatdesigningandvalidatingthreeproofcomprehensiontestsfortheoremspresentedinatransition-to-proofcourse,weaskedbetween130and200undergraduatestudentsinseveralsectionsofoneofthesecoursestotakelongversions(20to21multiple-choicequestions)ofthesetests.Whileanalysisofthesedataisongoing,wediscusspreliminaryfindingsaboutpsychometricpropertiesofthesetestsandstudentperformanceontheseproofcomprehensionmeasures.Paper
12311:35–12:05pm
SESSION23–MIXEDREPORTS
MarquisA Opportunitytolearnsolvingcontext-basedtasksprovidedbybusinesscalculustextbooks:Anexploratorystudy
ThembinkosiMkhatshwaandHelenDoerr
Thepurposeofthisstudywastoinvestigatetheopportunitiestolearnhowtosolverealisticcontext-basedproblemsthatundergraduatebusinesscalculustextbooksintheUnitedStatesoffertobusinessand/oreconomicsstudents.Todothis,weselectedandanalyzedsixdifferenttextbooksthatarewidelyusedintheteachingofbusinesscalculusnationwide.Therearethreemajorfindingsfromthisstudy:(1)amajorityofthetasksinallthetextbooksusesacamouflagecontext,(2)allthetasksinallthetextbookshavematchinginformation,and(3)onlythreetextbookshadreflectiontasks.Thefindingsofthissuggestthatbusinesscalculustextbooksdonotofferstudentsrichandsufficientopportunitiestolearnhowtosolverealisticproblemsinabusinessand/oreconomiccontext.
Paper
3MarquisB Students’conceptualizationsandrepresentationsofhowtwo
quantities’changetogether
KristinFrank
InthisarticleIdiscussthenatureoftwouniversityprecalculusstudents’meaningsforfunctionsandgraphs.Ifocusonthewaysinwhichthesemeaningsinfluencehowthesestudentsreasonedaboutandrepresentedhowtwoquantitieschangetogether.Myanalysisrevealedthatastudentwhoviewsagraphasastaticshapeanddoesnotseeagraphasarepresentationofhowtwoquantitieschangetogetherwillnotbesuccessfulinconstructingmeaningfulgraphs,evenininstanceswhensheisabletoreasonabouttwoquantitieschangingtogether.Studentsmadeprogressinseeinggraphsasemergentrepresentationsofhowtwoquantitieschangetogetherwhentheyconceptualizedthepoint(x,y)asamultiplicativeobjectthatrepresentedtherelationshipbetweenanxandyvalue.Paper
77
MarquisC Classroomculture,technology,&modeling:Acasestudyofstudents’engagementwithstatisticalideas
DanaKirin,JenniferNollandErinGlover
Advancesintechnologieshavechangedthewaystatisticiansdotheirwork,aswellashowpeoplereceiveandprocessinformation.Thecasestudypresentedherefollowstwogroupsoftwostudentswhoparticipatedinareform-orientedcurriculumthatutilizedtechnologytoengagestudentswithmodelingandsimulationactivitiestodeveloptheirstatisticalliteracy,thinking,andreasoning.Ouranalysisappliesasocialtheoryoflearningandaframeworkforstudentengagementasameansforstudyingstudents’developmentofstatisticalreasoning.Inaddition,weinvestigatetheimpactofacurriculumfocusedonmodelingandsimulationonthedevelopmentofstudents’statisticalreasoningskills.Paper
10512:05–1:05pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
LUNCH
1:10–1:40pm
SESSION24–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Studentproblemsolvinginthecontextofvolumesofrevolution
AnandBernardandStevenJones
Theliteratureonproblemsolvingindicatesthatfocusingonstrategiesforspecifictypesofproblemsmaybemorebeneficialthanseekingtodeterminegrand,generalproblemsolvingstrategiesthatworkacrosslargedomains.Giventhisguideline,weseektounderstandandmapoutdifferentstrategiesstudents’usedinthespecificcontextofvolumesofrevolutionproblemsfromcalculus.Ourstudydemonstratesthecomplexnatureofsolvingvolumesofrevolutionproblemsbasedonthemultitudeofdiversepathsthestudentsinourstudytooktoachievethedesired“epistemicform”ofanintegralexpressionforagivenvolumeproblem.Whilethelarge-grained,overarchingstrategyforthesestudentsdidnotdiffermuch,thecomplexitycameinhowthestudentcarriedouteachstepintheiroverallstrategy.
Paper
14
MarquisB Students’conceptionsoffactorialspriortoandwithincombinatorialcontexts
EliseLockwoodandSarahErickson
Countingproblemsofferrichopportunitiesforstudentstoengageinmathematicalthinking,buttheycanbedifficultforstudentstosolve.Inthispaper,wepresentastudythatexaminesstudentthinkingaboutoneconceptwithincounting,factorials,whichareakeyaspectofmanycombinatorialideas.Inanefforttobetterunderstandstudents’conceptionsoffactorials,weconductedinterviewswith20undergraduatestudents.Wepresentakeydistinctionbetweencomputationalversuscombinatorialconceptions,andweexplorethreeaspectsofdatathatshedlightonstudents’conceptions(theirinitialcharacterizations,theirdefinitionsof0!,andtheirresponsestoLikert-responsequestions).Wepresentimplicationsthismayhaveformathematicseducatorsbothwithinandseparatefromcombinatorics,andwediscusspossibledirectionsforfutureresearch.Paper
32MarquisC Whenshouldresearchonproof-orientedmathematical
behaviorattendtotheroleofparticularmathematicalcontent?
PaulChristianDawkinsandShivKarunakaran
Becauseprovingcharacterizesmuchmathematicalpractice,itcontinuestobeaprominentfocusofmathematicseducationresearch.Aspectsofproving,suchasdefinitionuse,exampleuse,andlogic,actassubdomainsforthisareaofresearch.Toyieldsuchcontent-generalclaims,studiesoftendownplayortrytocontrolfortheinfluenceofparticularmathematicalcontent(analysis,algebra,numbertheoryetc.)andstudents’mathematicalmeaningsforthiscontent.Inthispaper,weconsiderthepossiblenegativeconsequencesformathematicseducationresearchofadoptingsuchadomain-generalcharacterizationofprovingbehavior.Wedosobycomparingcontent-generalandcontent-specificanalysesoftwoprovingepisodestakenfromthepriorresearchofthetwoauthorsrespectively.Weintendtosensitizetheresearchcommunitytotheroleparticularmathematicalcontentcanandshouldplayinresearchonmathematicalproving.Paper
481:50–2:20pm
SESSION25–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Lackingconfidenceandresourcesdespitehavingvalue:Apotentialexplanationforlearninggoalsandinstructionaltasksusedinundergraduatemathematicscoursesforprospectivesecondaryteachers
YvonneLai
Inthispaper,Ireportonaninterview-basedstudyof9mathematicianstoinvestigatetheprocessofchoosingtasksforundergraduatemathematicscoursesforprospectivesecondaryteachers.Participantswereaskedtoprioritizecomplementarylearninggoalsandtasksforanundergraduatemathematicscourseforprospectivesecondaryteachersandtoratetheirconfidenceintheirabilitytoteachwiththosetasksandgoals.Whilethemathematicianslargelyvaluedtasktypesandgoalsthatmathematicseducationresearchershaveproposedtobebeneficialforsuchcourses,themathematiciansalsolargelyexpressedlackofconfidenceintheirabilitytoteachwiththesetasktypesandgoals.Expectancy-valuetheory,incombinationwiththesefindings,isproposedasoneaccountofwhy,despiteconsensusaboutbroadaimsofmathematicalpreparationforsecondaryteaching,theseaimsmaybeinconsistentwithlearningopportunitiesaffordedbyactualtasksandgoalsused.
Paper
94MarquisB Helpinginstructorstoadoptresearch-supportedtechniques:
LessonsfromIBLworkshops
CharlesN.HaywardandSandraL.Laursen
Inquiry-basedlearning(IBL)isaresearch-supportedformofactivelearninginmathematics.Whilestudiescontinuallyshowbenefitsofactivelearning,itisdifficulttogetfacultytoadoptthesemethods.Wepresentresultsfromasetofintensive,one-weekworkshopsdesignedtoteachuniversitymathematicsinstructorstouseIBL.Weusesurveyandinterviewdatatoexplorewhytheseworkshopssuccessfullygotmanyparticipants(atleast58%)toadoptIBL.Resultsareframedthroughathree-stagetheoryofinstructorchangedevelopedbyPaulsenandFeldman(1995).Wefocusspecificallyonthefirststage,‘unfreezing.’Inthisstage,instructorsgainthemotivationtochange,sothesefindingsmayprovidethemostusefullessonsforhelpingmoreinstructorstoadoptresearch-supportedinstructionalstrategies.OneofthekeyfactorsforthehighadoptionofIBLwasportrayingitbroadlyandinclusivelyinavarietyofcontexts,ratherthanasahighlyprescriptivemethod.Paper
36
MarquisC Students’obstaclesandresistancetoRiemannsuminterpretationsofthedefiniteintegral
JosephF.Wagner
Studentsuseavarietyofresourcestomakesenseofintegration,andinterpretingthedefiniteintegralasasumofinfinitesimalproducts(rootedintheconceptofaRiemannsum)isparticularlyusefulinmanyphysicalcontexts.Thisstudyofbeginningandupper-levelundergraduatephysicsstudentsexaminessomeobstaclesstudentsencounterwhentryingtomakesenseofintegration,aswellassomediscomfortsandskepticismsomestudentsmaintainevenafterconstructingusefulconceptionsoftheintegral.Inparticular,manystudentsattempttoexplainwhatintegrationdoesbytryingtointerpretthealgebraicmanipulationsandcomputationsinvolvedinfindingantiderivatives.Thistendency,perhapsarisingfromtheirpastexperienceofmakingsenseofalgebraicexpressionsandequations,suggestsareluctancetousetheirunderstandingof"whataRiemannsumdoes"tointerpret"whatanintegraldoes.”Paper
102:30–3:00pm
SESSION26–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA AnationalinvestigationofPrecalculusthroughCalculus2
ChrisRasmussen,NanehApkarian,DavidBressoud,JessicaEllis,EstrellaJohnsonandSeanLarsen
Wepresentfindingsfromarecentlycompletedcensussurveyofallmathematicsdepartmentsthatofferagraduatedegree(Master’sand/orPhD)inmathematics.Thecensussurveyispartofalargerprojectinvestigatingdepartment-levelfactorsthatinfluencestudentsuccessovertheentireprogressionoftheintroductorymathematicscoursesthatarerequiredofmostSTEMmajors,beginningwithPrecalculusandcontinuingthroughthefullyearofsinglevariablecalculus.Thefindingspaintaportraitofstudents’curricularexperienceswithPrecalculusandsinglevariablecalculus,aswellastheviewpointsheldbydepartmentsofmathematicsaboutthatexperience.Weseethatdepartmentsarenotunawareofthevalueofparticularfeaturescharacteristicofmoresuccessfulcalculusprograms,butthattheyarenotalwayssuccessfulatimplementation.However,ourdataalsosuggesthopeforthefuture.Ourworknotonlyrevealswhatiscurrentlyhappening,butalsowhatischanging,how,andwhy.
Paper23
MarquisB Whennothingleadstoeverything:Novicesandexpertsworkingatthelevelofalogicaltheory
StacyBrown
BuildingonAntoniniandMariotti’s(2008)theorizationofmathematicaltheoremandresearchonstudents’meta-theoreticaldifficultieswithindirectproof,thisstudyexaminesmathematicsmajorsandmathematicians:(1)responsesandapproachestothevalidationtasksrelatedtotheassertionS*→S,whengivenaprimarystatement,S,oftheform∀n,P(n)⇒Q(n))andasecondarystatement,S*oftheformusedinproofsbycontradiction;namely,∄n,P(n)∧~Q(n));and,(2)selectionofastatementtoprovegivenS*andS.Findingsindicatethatnoviceproofwritersresponsesdifferfromadvancedstudentsandmathematiciansbothintheirapproachesandselections,withnovicestendingtobecomeentangledinnaturallanguageantonymsandtoengageinthechunkingof,ratherthanparsingof,quantifiedcompoundstatements.
Paper82
MarquisC Effectsofdynamicvisualizationsoftwareuseonstrugglingstudents’understandingofcalculus:ThecaseofDavid
JulieSuttonandJamesEpperson
Usingdynamicvisualizationsoftware(DVS)mayengageundergraduatestudentsincalculuswhileprovidinginstructorsinsightintostudentlearningandunderstanding.Resultspresentedderivefromaqualitativestudyofninestudents,eachcompletingaseriesoffourindividualinterviews.WediscussthemesarisingfrominterviewswithDavid,astudentexploringmathematicalrelationshipswithDVSwhoearnsaCincalculus.Davidpreferstovisualizewhensolvingmathematicaltasksandpreviousresearchsuggeststhatsuchstudents,whilenotthe‘stars’oftheirmathematicsclassroom,mayhaveadeeperunderstandingofmathematicalconceptsthattheirnon-visualizingpeers.Usingmodifiedgroundedtheorytechniques,weexamineevidenceofuncontrollablementalimagery,theneedtorefocusDavidonsalientaspectsoftheanimations,instanceswhenDavid’sapparentconceptualknowledgeisneitherfullyconnectedtonorsupportedbyproceduralknowledge,andDavid’sfailuretotransferknowledgewhenDVSwasnotofferedduringassessment.
Paper
1203:00–3:30pm
COFFEEBREAK
3:30–4:00pm
SESSION27–PRELIMINARYREPORTS
MarquisA Measuringstudentconceptualunderstanding:ThecaseofEuler’smethod
WilliamHall,KarenKeeneandNicholasFortune
Thispreliminarypaperreportsonearlyworkforadifferentialequationsconceptinventory,whichisbeingdevelopedforanNSF-fundedprojecttosupportmathematicsinstructorsastheyimplementinquiry-orientedcurricula.Thegoalistoassessstudentlearningofdifferentialequations.Preliminaryresultsshowthattheiterativemethodofdevelopingandfieldtestingitems,conductingstudentinterviews,andmodificationmayprovesuccessfultocompleteavalidconceptinventory.ThefieldtestingandpilotingofquestionsconcerningEuler’smethodshowthatstudentsdorespondastheresearchsuggestsbutthatEuler’smethodcanberecreatedbystudentsandthecorrectresponsecanbe“figuredout.”Paper
50MarquisB Developingmathematicalknowledgeforteachingincontent
coursesforpreserviceelementaryteachers
BillyJackson,JustinDimmel,MeredithMuller
Inrecentyears,muchattentionintheteachereducationliteraturehasbeengiventowaysinwhichinserviceteachersdevelopfacilitywiththeconstructknownasmathematicalknowledgeforteaching(MKT).MuchlessisknownabouttheabilityofpreserviceteacherstoconstructMKT.Toaddressthis,thecurrentpreliminaryreportaddstotheresearchbasebyinvestigatingtwoprimaryquestions:(1)CanteachersbuildMKTintheircontentcourses?,and(2)Canteachersengageinmeaningfulmathematicaldiscourseasaresultoftheircontentcourses?ThereportexaminestheeffectsofasemesterlongcourseonnumberandoperationsdesignedtoallowpreserviceelementaryteachersopportunitiestobuilddifferentaspectsofMKT.Verypreliminaryanalysisshowsthatmanystudentslackthisknowledgeuponenteringthecourse,butmostareabletobegintobuildadegreeoffacilityinitbycoursecompletion.
Paper
47
MarquisC Obstaclesindevelopingrobustproportionalreasoningstructures:Astoryofteachers’thinkingabouttheshapetask
MattWeber,AmiePieroneandAprilStrom
Thispaperpresentssomeinitialfindingsofaninvestigationfocusedonmathematicsteachers’waysofthinkingaboutproportionalrelationships,withanemphasisonmultiplicativereasoning.Deficienciesinproportionalreasoningamongteacherscanbeseriousimpedimentstothedevelopmentofrobustreasoningamongtheirstudents.Assuch,thisstudyfocusesonhowmathematicsteachersreasonthroughtasksthatinvolveproportionalreasoningbyaddressingthefollowingtworesearchquestions:(1)Inwhatwaysdoteachersreasonthroughaspecifictaskdesignedtoelicitproportionalreasoning?and(2)Whatdifficultiesdoteachersencounterwhilereasoningthroughsuchtasks?Thispaperdiscussestheconstructionofarobustproportionalreasoningstructureinthecontextofaspecifictaskanddiscussesoneparticularobstacle,whichimpedestheconstructionofsuchastructure.Paper
107GrandBallroom5
Changesinassessmentpracticesofcalculusinstructorswhilepilotingresearch-basedcurricularactivities
MichaelOehrtman,MatthewWilson,MichaelTallmanandJasonMartin
Wereportouranalysisofchangesinassessmentpracticesofintroductorycalculusinstructorspilotingweeklylabsdesignedtoenhancethecoherence,rigor,andaccessibilityofcentralconceptsintheirclassroomactivity.Ouranalysiscomparedallitemsonmidtermandfinalexamscreatedbysixinstructorspriortotheirparticipationintheprogram(355items)withthosetheycreatedduringtheirparticipation(417items).Priorexamsofthesixinstructorsweresimilartothenationalprofile,butduringthepilotprogramincreasedfrom11.3%ofitemsrequiringdemonstrationofunderstandingto31.7%.Theirquestionsinvolvingrepresentationsotherthansymbolicexpressionschangedfrom36.7%to58.5%oftheitems.Thefrequencyofexamquestionsrequiringexplanationsgrewfrom4%to15.1%,andtheyshiftedfrom0.8%to4.1%ofitemsrequiringanopen-endedresponse.Weexaminequalitativedatatoexploreinstructors’attributionsforthesechanges.Paper
111
CityCenterA Acriticallookatundergraduatemathematicsclassrooms:DetailingmathematicssuccessasaracializedandgenderedexperienceforLatin@collegeengineers
LuisLeyva
Latin@sdemonstratedanincreaseofnearly75%inengineeringdegreecompletionoverthelast15years(NationalScienceFoundation,2015).However,Latin@sremainlargelyunderrepresentedacrossSTEMdisciplineswithscholarscallingforanalysesoftheirundergraduateeducationexperiencestoimproveretention(Cole&Espinoza,2008;Crisp,Nora,&Taggart,2009).WithcalculusasagatekeeperintoadvancedSTEMcourses,undergraduatemathematicsmustbeexaminedasasocialexperienceforLatin@engineeringstudents.ThisreportpresentsfindingsfromaphenomenologicalstudyonmathematicssuccessasaracializedandgenderedexperienceamongfiveLatin@collegeengineersatapredominantlywhiteinstitution.Inlightofrecentcallsforequityconsiderationsinundergraduatemathematicseducation(Adiredja,Alexander,&Andrews-Larson,2015;Rasmussen&Wawro,underreview),thisreportfocusesonLatin@collegeengineers’mathematicsclassroomexperienceswithimplicationsforestablishingmorepositiveandmeaningfulmathematicslearningopportunitiesforLatin@sandotherunderrepresentedpopulationsinSTEM.
Paper
121CityCenterB Students’sense-makingpracticesforvideolectures
AaronWeinbergandMatthewThomas
Therehasbeenincreasedinterestintheuseofvideosforteachingtechniquessuchas“flipped”classrooms.However,thereislimitedevidencethatconnectstheuseofthesevideoswithactuallearning.Thus,thereisaneedtostudythewaysstudentsexperienceandlearnfromvideos.Inthispaper,weusesense-makingframesasatooltoanalyzestudent’svideo-watching.Wedescribepreliminaryresultsfrominterviewswith12studentswhowatchedshortvideosonintroductorystatisticsandprobabilityconceptsanddiscussimplicationsforstudentlearning.
Paper126
4:10–4:40pm
SESSION28–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Graduatestudents’pedagogicalchangesusingiterativelessonstudy
SeanYee,KimberlyRogersandSimaSharghi
Researchersattwouniversitiesimplementedaniterativelessonstudyprocesswithtengraduatestudentinstructors(GSIs),fivefromeachuniversity’smathematicsdepartment.Overthespanoftwoweeks,eachgroupofGSIsmetwithafacilitatortocollaborativelyplananundergraduatemathematicslesson,implementthelesson,revisetheirlessonplan,reteachthelessontoanotherclassofstudents,andcompleteafinalreflection.Usingamultiplecasestudyqualitativemethodology,wethematicallycodedGSIconsistenciesandrevisionstolessonplanningduringtheiterativeprocessaccordingtothePrinciplestoActionsnationalmathematicalteachingpractices.AtbothuniversitiestherewerespecificteachingpracticesthatGSIsusedthroughouttheiterativelessonstudyandspecificteachingpracticesthatGSIsrevised.Identifyingtheseteachingpracticesoffersinsightintotheutilityandvalueofiterativelessonstudywithgraduatestudentinstructors.
Paper51
MarquisB Investigatingtheroleofasecondaryteacher’simageofinstructionalconstraintsonhisenactedsubjectmatterknowledge
MichaelTallman
Ipresenttheresultsofastudydesignedtodetermineiftherewereincongruitiesbetweenasecondaryteacher’smathematicalknowledgeandthemathematicalknowledgeheleveragedinthecontextofteaching,andifso,toascertainhowtheteacher’senactedsubjectmatterknowledgewasconditionedbyhisconsciousresponsestothecircumstancesheappraisedasconstraintsonhispractice.Toaddressthisfocus,Iconductedthreesemi-structuredclinicalinterviewsthatelicitedtheteacher’srationaleforinstructionaloccasionsinwhichthemathematicalwaysofunderstandingheconveyedinhisteachingdifferedfromthewaysofunderstandinghedemonstratedduringaseriesoftask-basedclinicalinterviews.Myanalysisrevealedthatthattheoccasionsinwhichtheteacherconveyed/demonstratedinconsistentwaysofunderstandingwerenotoccasionedbyhisreactingtoinstructionalconstraints,butwereinsteadaconsequenceofhisunawarenessofthementalactivityinvolvedinconstructingparticularwaysofunderstandingmathematicalideas.
Paper52
MarquisC Learningtothink,talk,andactlikeaninstructor:Aframeworkfornovicetertiaryinstructorteachingpreparationprograms
JessicaEllis
InthisreportIpresentaframeworktocharacterizenovicetertiaryinstructorteachingpreparationprograms.Thisframeworkwasdevelopedthroughcasestudyanalysesoffourgraduatestudentteachingassistantprofessionaldevelopment(GTAPD)programsatinstitutionsidentifiedashavingmoresuccessfulcalculusprogramscomparedtootherinstitutions.Thecomponentsoftheframeworkarethestructureoftheprogram,thedepartmentalandinstitutionalcultureandcontextthattheprogramissituatedwithin,andthetypesofknowledgeandpracticesemphasizedintheprogram.InthisreportIcharacterizeoneoftheprogramsinvolvedinthedevelopmentoftheframeworkasanexampleofhowitisused.Inadditiontocharacterizingexistingprograms,thisframeworkcanbeusedtoevaluateprogramsandaidinthedevelopmentofnewnovicetertiaryinstructorteachingpreparationprograms.Paper
844:50–5:20pm
SESSION29–CONTRIBUTEDREPORTS
MarquisA Howshouldyouparticipate?Letmecounttheways
RachelKeller,KarenZwanchandStevenDeshong
RetentionofstudentsinSTEMmajorsisanissueofnationalstabilitybecausegovernmentprojectionsindicateournationtoneedonemillionadditionalSTEMmajorsby2022(PCAST,2012);thusly,thecurrenttrendsinattritionarealarming.StudentsleaveSTEMforvariousreasons,butpoorexperiencesinCalculusIseemtobeasignificantcontributingfactorformanyswitchers,especiallyfemalestudents.Usingdatasituatedwithinalargerstudy(CharacteristicsofSuccessfulProgramsinCollegeCalculus),thepresentreportlooksspecificallyatstudentparticipationanditsinfluenceonCalculusIsuccess.Resultsindicatethatwhileparticipationissignificantlycorrelatedwithsuccess,thiseffectisnotuniformlydistributedacrosstypesofparticipationorgendergroups.Interestingly,overallsuccessrateswereequal,butgenderdifferenceswerenotedinfrequencyofparticipatorybehaviorsanddistributionofgrades;specifically,males(whoearnedmoreAgrades)preferredin-classparticipationandfemalespreferredout-of-classparticipatoryactivities.
Paper22
MarquisB ProbabilisticThinking:Aninitiallookatstudents’meaningsforprobability
NeilHatfield
ProbabilityisthecentralcomponentthatallowsStatisticstoprovideausefultoolformanyfields.Thus,themeaningsthatstudentsdevelopforprobabilityhavethepotentialforlastingimpacts.UsingThompson’s(20015)theoryofmeanings,thisreportsharestheresultsofexamining114undergraduatestudents’conveyedmeaningsforprobabilityaftertheyreceivedinstruction.Paper
61MarquisC Fosteringteacherchangethroughincreasednoticing:Creating
authenticopportunitiesforteacherstoreflectonstudentthinking
AlanO'BryanandMarilynCarlson
Thispaperreportsresultsfromacasestudyfocusingonasecondaryteacher’ssense-makingasshewaschallengedtoreinterprethermeaningsforalgebraicsymbolsandprocesses.Buildingfromtheseopportunities,sheredesignedlessonstogatherinformationabouthowherstudentsconceptualizedquantitiesandhowtheythoughtofvariables,terms,andexpressionsasrepresentingthosequantities’values.Shethenusedthisinformationtorespondproductivelytoherunderstandingofindividualstudents’meaningsandreasoningelicitedduringtheselessons.Wearguethatthiscasestudydemonstratesthepotentialforcoordinatingquantitativereasoningwithteachernoticingasalenstosupportteacherlearningandwerecommendspecificmathematicalpracticesthatcanhelpteachersdevelopmorefocusednoticingofstudents’mathematicalmeaningsduringinstruction.Paper
715:25–6:20pmGrandFoyer
POSTERSESSION
Impactofadvancedmathematicalknowledgeontheteachingandlearningofsecondarymathematics
EileenMurray,DebasmitaBasu,MatthewWright
Thisposterpresentspreliminarydatafromanexploratorystudythataimstoadvanceourunderstandingofthenatureofmathematicsofferedtoprospectivemathematicsteachersbylookingatmathematicalconnections.Inthisstudy,weinvestigatehowin-serviceandpre-servicemiddleschoolteachersmakeconnectionsbetweentertiaryandsecondarymathematicsaswellasifandhowtheunderstandingofconnectionsinfluencesteachers’thoughtsaboutteachingandlearningmathematics.
Paper
Analyzingclassroomdevelopmentsoflanguageandnotationforinterpretingmatricesaslineartransformations.
RubyQuea,ChristineAndrews-Larson
Aspartofalargerstudyofstudentsreasoninginlinearalgebra,thisresearchanalyzeshowstudentsmakesenseoflanguageandnotationintroducedbyinstructorswhenlearningmatricesaslineartransformations.Thispaperexaminestheimplementationofaninquiry-orientedinstructionthatconsistsofstudentsgenerating,composing,andinvertingmatricesinthecontextofincreasingtheheightandleaningaletter“N”placedona2-dimensionalCartesiancoordinatesystem(Wawroet.al.,2012).Ianalyzedtwoclassroomimplementationsandnotedhowinstructorsintroducedandformalizedmathematicallanguageandnotationinthecontextofthisparticularinstructionalsequence,andthenrelatedthattothewaysthatlanguageandnotationweresubsequentlytakenupbystudents.Thisworkwasconductedinordertoenablemetobuildtheoryabouttherelationshipbetweenstudentlearningandthewaysinwhichlanguageandnotationareintroduced.
Paper
WhatdostudentsattendtowhenfirstgraphinginR3?
AllisonDorko
ThisposterconsiderswhatstudentsattendtoastheyfirstencounterR3coordinateaxesandareaskedtographfunctionswithfreevariables.Graphsarecriticalrepresentations,yetstudentsstrugglewithgraphingfunctionsofmorethanonevariable.Becausepriorworkhasrevealedthatstudents’conceptionsofmultivariablegraphareoftenrelatedtotheirconceptionsaboutsinglevariablefunctions,weusedanactor-orientedtransferperspectivetoidentifywhatstudentsseeassimilarbetweengraphingfunctionswithfreevariablesinR2andR3.Weconsideredwhatstudentsattendedtomathematically,andfoundthattheyfocusedonequidistance,parallelism,andcoordinatepoints.
Paper
Supportformathematicians'teachingreforminanonlineworkinggroupforinquiryorienteddifferentialequations
NicholasFortune
Thereismoreneedforresearchonhowmathematicianscanaltertheirteachingstyletoareformapproach(Speer,Smith,&Horvath,2010),especiallyiftheyhavealwaysbeenteachingthesameway(Speer&Wagner,2009;Wagner,Speer,&Rossa,2007).Oneparticularareathatneedsmoreworkisinvestigationsofsupportstructuresformathematicianshopingtoreformtheirteachingpractice.ThisposterfocusesonsupportsdesignedtoaidinthereformofteachingpracticeandspecificallydiscussestheTeachingInquiry-orientedMathematics:ExternalSupports(TIMES)projectandoneonlineworkinggroup(OWG)usedasamodeofsupportintheproject.ResultsindicatethatfacetsoftheOWGaresuccessfulsupportstructuresformathematicianswhodesiretoaligntheirpracticetoaninquiryoriented(IO)approachtoundergraduatedifferentialequations(Rasmussen&Kwon,2007;Rasmussen,2003).
Paper
Students’understandingofmathematicsinthecontextofchemicalkinetics
KinseyBain,AlenaMoonandMarcyTowns
Thisworkexploresgeneralchemistrystudents’useofmathematicalreasoningtosolvequantitativechemicalkineticsproblems.Personalconstructs,avariationofconstructivism,providesthetheoreticalunderpinningforthiswork,assertingthatstudentsengageinacontinuousprocessofconstructingandmodifyingtheirmentalmodelsaccordingtonewexperiences.Thestudyaimedtoanswerthefollowingresearchquestion:Howdonon-majorstudentsinasecond-semestergeneralchemistrycourseandaphysicalchemistrycourseusemathematicstosolvekineticsproblemsinvolvingratelaws?Toanswerthisquestion,semi-structuredinterviewsusingathink-aloudprotocolwereconducted.Ablendedprocessingframework,whichtargetshowproblemsolversdrawfromdifferentknowledgedomains,wasusedtointerpretstudents’problemsolving.Preliminaryfindingsdescribeinstancesinwhichstudentsblendtheirknowledgetosolvekineticsproblems.
Paper
AcomparativestudyofcalculusIatalargeresearchuniversity
XiangmingWu,JessicaDeshler,MarcelaMeraTrujillo,EddieFullerandMarjorieDarrah
Inthisreport,wedescribetheresultsofanalyzingdatacollectedfrom502CalculusIstudentsatalargeresearchuniversityintheU.S.StudentswereenrolledinoneoffivedifferentversionsofCalculusIofferedattheuniversity.Weareinterestedin(i)whetherthedifferentcharacteristicsofeachversionofthecourseaffectstudents’attitudestowardmathematicsand(ii)howeachcoursemightaffectstudents’intentionsofpursuingscience,technology,engineeringandmathematics(STEM)degrees.WeexaminedatarelatedtothesetwoissuesgatheredfromstudentsviasurveysduringonesemesterinCalculusI.
Paper
Activelearninginundergraduateprecalculusandsingle-variablecalculus
NanehApakarianandDanaKirin
ThestudypresentedhereexaminestheactivelearningstrategiescurrentlyinplaceinthePrecalculusthroughsinglevariablecalculussequence.Whilemanylamentthelackofactivelearninginundergraduatemathematics,ourworkrevealstherealitybehindthatfeeling.Resultsfromanationalsurveyofmathematicsdepartmentsallowustoreporttheproportionofcoursesinthemainstreamsequenceutilizingactivelearningstrategies,whatthosestrategiesare,andhowthosestrategiesarebeingimplemented.
Paper
AProposedFrameworkforTrackingProfessionalDevelopmentThroughGTA’s
HayleyMilbourneandSusanNickerson
Thereareseveraldifferentmodelsofgraduateteachingassistantprogramsinmathematicsdepartmentsacrossthenation(Ellis,2015).Oneparticularpublicuniversityhasrecentlyreformattedtheircalculusprogramtowardapeer-mentormodelandthisisthefirstyearofimplementation.Inthepeer-mentormodel,thereisaleadTAwhoservesasasupportfortheotherTAsintheprogram.Becauseofthis,theprofessionaldevelopmentinwhichtheTAsareengagedisformallydirectedbybothfacultyandapeer.WeareinterestedindiscussingaframeworkknownastheVygotskySpaceasamethodologyfortrackingtheappropriationandsharingofpedagogicalpracticesamongthoseresponsibleforcalculusinstruction.
Paper
HowCalculusstudentsatsuccessfulprogramstalkabouttheirinstructors
AnnieBergmanandDanaKirin
TheCSPCC(CharacteristicsofSuccessfulProgramsinCollegeCalculus)projectwasa5-yearstudyfocusedonCalculusIinstructionatcollegesanduniversitiesacrosstheUnitedStateswithoverarchinggoalsofidentifyingthefactorsthatcontributetosuccessfulprograms.Inthisposter,wedrawfromstudentfocusgroupinterviewdatacollectedfromschoolsthatwereidentifiedbytheCSPCCprojectasbeingsuccessful.Theanalyseswewillpresentinthisposterwillcharacterizethewaysinwhichcalculusstudentstalkabouttheirinstructorsinanattempttounderstandhowtheirperceptionsshapetheirexperience.
Paper
Investigatinguniversitystudentsdifficultieswithalgebra
SepidehStewartandStacyReeder
Algebraisfrequentlyreferredtoasthe“gateway”courseforhighschoolmathematics.EvenamongthosewhocompletehighschoolAlgebracourses,manystrugglewithmoreadvancedmathematicsandarefrequentlyunderpreparedforcollegelevelmathematics.Formanyyears,collegeinstructorshaveviewedthefinalproblemsolvingstepsintheirrespectivedisciplinesas“justAlgebra”,butinreality,aweakfoundationinAlgebramaybethecauseoffailureformanycollegestudents.Thepurposeofthisprojectistoidentifycommonalgebraicerrorsstudentsmakeincollegelevelmathematicscoursesthatplaguetheirabilitytosucceedinhigherlevelmathematicscourses.Theidentificationofthesecommonerrorswillaidinthecreationofamodelforintervention.Paper
Aqualitativestudyofthewaysstudentsandfacultyinthebiologicalsciencesthinkaboutandusethedefiniteintegral
WilliamHall
Inthisposter,Isharemymethodsandpilotinterviewresultsconcerningaqualitativestudyofthewaysundergraduatestudentsandfacultyfromthebiologicalsciencesthinkaboutandusethedefiniteintegral.Inthisresearch,Iutilizetask-basedinterviewsincludingfiveappliedcalculustasksinordertoexplorehowstudentsandfacultythinkaboutarea,accumulation,andthedefiniteintegral.Earlyresultsfrompilotinterviewshelpedmerevisetheinterviewprotocolsandindicatethatstudentreasoningmaybeaffectedbyexperienceandcontext.Inpresentingthisposter,Ihopetogainfeedbackfromthecommunityonmyresearchmethodologyandpotentialanalyticalstrategies.Paper
RootofMisconceptions–theIncorporationofMathematical
IdeasinHistory
Kuo-LiangChang
Theevolutionofamathematicalconceptinhistoryhasbeentheprocessofmergingdifferentideastoformamorerich,general,andrigorousconcept.Ironically,students,whenlearningsuchwell-developedconcepts,havesimilardifficultiesandmakethesamemisconceptionsagainandagain.Toillustrate,despitethewell-developedanddefinedconceptofrealnumbers,manystudentsstillhavedifficultiesincomparingfractionsordoingbasicoperationsonirrationalnumbers.Inthisposter,theincorporationofdifferentideastoformageneralandrigorousmathematicalconceptinhistoryisexamined.Students’strugglesandmisconceptionsinlearningtheconceptsareinvestigatedfromtheperspectiveoftheincorporationprocess.Finally,amodelfordifferentiatingandvalidatingthevariationsofageneralmathematicalconceptissuggestedforresolvinglearningdifficultiesandmisconceptions.Paper
StudentExperiencesinaProblem-CenteredDevelopmentalMathematicsClass
MarthaMakowski
Giventhelargenumbersofstudentswhoenrolleachyearindevelopmentalmathematicsclasses,communitycollegeshavestartedcreatingdevelopmentalclassesthatbothengagestudentsinmeaningfulmathematicsandprovidethemwithanefficientpathwaytothecollege-levelcurriculum.Thisstudyexamineshowcommunitycollegestudentsenrolledinaproblem-baseddevelopmentalalgebraclassexperiencethecurriculumandinstruction.Eightstudentsfromatargetclassroomwereinterviewedabouttheirexperiencesintheclass,focusingonhowtheyexperiencedgroupwork,problemsolving,andtheroleoftheteacher.Surveyswerealsousedtomeasuretheirattitudestowardsmathematicsalongseveraldimensionsatthebeginningandendofthesemester.Studentswholikedgroupworkwereenergizedbytheopportunitytoworkwithpeoplewhilelearningandvaluedthemultipleopportunitiesgroupworkprovidedforthemtochecktheirwork.Fewstudentssawgroupworkasanopportunitytoexploreconceptualideas.Theresultssuggestthatimplementationsofsuchclassescouldbenefitfromstructureddiscussionaboutgroupworknormsandexplicitdiscussionaboutthepurposeofsolvingproblems.Paper
Acollaborativeeffortforimprovingcalculusthroughbetter
assessmentpractices
JustinHeavilin,HodsonKyleandBrynjaKohler
Likemanyinstitutionsacrossthecountry,UtahStateUniversity’sDepartmentofMathematicsandStatisticshasembarkedonanefforttoimprovethecalculussequencewiththefollowingobjectives:(1)improveourstudents’comprehensionandapplicationofkeytopics,(2)retain/recruitmorestudentsintoSTEMmajors,and(3)providemoreconsistencyacrosssections.Afterinitialplanningandpreparationinthe2014-15academicyear,newpracticeswerereadyforimplementation.Inthefallof2015,teamsofinstructorsworkedfromcommonguidedcoursenotes,andmetweeklytodiscussinstructionanddevelopcommonassessments.ThisposterdisplaysthemethodologyoftestdesignanditemanalysisweemployedintheCalculus2course.Whileourteamisonlyatthebeginningstagesofthiswork,themethodsforcreatingreliableandrelevantmeasuresofstudentlearningholdpromiseforachievingthegoalsofourreform.
Paper
Exploringstudentunderstandingofthenegativesigninintroductoryphysicscontexts
SuzanneBrahmiaandAndrewBoudreaux
Recentstudiesinphysicseducationresearchdemonstratethatalthoughphysicsstudentsaregenerallysuccessfulexecutingmathematicalprocedures,theystrugglewiththeuseofmathematicalconceptsforsensemaking.Inthisposterweinvestigatestudentreasoningaboutnegativenumbersincontextscommonlyencounteredincalculus-basedintroductoryphysics.Wedescribealarge-scalestudy(N>900)involvingtwointroductoryphysicscourses:calculus-basedmechanicsandcalculus-basedelectricityandmagnetism(E&M).Wepresentdatafromsixassessmentitems(3inmechanicsand3inE&M)thatprobestudentunderstandingofnegativenumbersinphysicscontexts.Ourresultsrevealthatevenmathematicallywell-preparedstudentsstrugglewiththewaythatwesymbolizeinphysics,andthatthevariedusesofthenegativesigninphysicscanpresentanobstacletounderstandingthatpersiststhroughouttheintroductorysequence.
Paper
Classroomobservation,instructorinterview,andinstructorself-reportastoolsindeterminingfidelityofimplementationforanintervention
ShandyHauk,KatieSalgueroandJoyceKaser
Aweb-basedactivityandtestingsystem(WATS)hasfeaturessuchasadaptiveproblemsets,instructionalvideos,anddata-driventoolsforinstructorstousetomonitorandscaffoldstudentlearning.CentraltoWATSadoptionandusearequestionsabouttheimplementationprocess:Whatconstitutes“good”implementationandhowfarfrom“good”isgoodenough?Herewereportonastudyaboutimplementationthatispartofastate-widerandomizedcontrolledtrialexaminingstudentlearningincommunitycollegealgebrawhenaparticularWATSsuiteoftoolsisused.Discussionquestionsforconferenceparticipantsdigintothechallengesandopportunitiesinresearchingfidelityofimplementationinthecommunitycollegecontext,particularlytheroleofinstructionalpracticeasacontextualcomponentoftheresearch.
Paper
Separatingissuesinthelearningofalgebrafrommathematicalproblemsolving
R.CavenderCampbell,KathrynRhoadsandJamesA.MendozaEpperson
Students’difficultyinlearningschoolalgebrahasmotivatedaplethoraofresearchonknowledgeandskillsneededforsuccessinalgebraandsubsequentundergraduatemathematicscourses.However,ingatewaymathematicscoursesforscience,technology,engineering,andmathematicsmajors,studentsuccessratesremainlow.Onereasonforthismaybetothelackofunderstandingofthresholdsinstudentmathematicalproblemsolving(MPS)practicesnecessaryforsuccessinlatercourses.BuildingfromoursynthesisoftheliteratureinMPS,wedevelopedLikertscaleitemstoassessundergraduatestudents’MPS.Weusedthisemergingassessmentandindividual,task-basedinterviewstobetterunderstandstudents’MPS.Preliminaryresultssuggestthatstudents’issuesinalgebradonotprohibitthemfromusingtheirtypicalproblemsolvingmethods.Thus,theassessmentitemsreflectstudents’MPS,regardlessofpossiblemisconceptionsinalgebra,andprovideamechanismforexaminingMPScapacityseparatefromproceduralandconceptualissuesinalgebra.
Paper
Communicativeartifactsofproof:Transitionsfromascertaining
topersuading
DavidPlaxcoandMilosSavic
Withthisposter,wewishtohighlightanimportantaspectoftheprovingprocess.Specifically,werevisitHarelandSowder’s(1998,2007)proofschemestoextendtheauthors’constructsofascertainingandpersuading.Withthisdiscussion,wereflectontheoriginaltheoreticalframeworkinlightofmorerecentresearchinthefieldanddrawfocustoacriticalaspectoftheprovingprocessinwhichtheprovergeneratesthecommunicativeartifactsofproof(CAP)criticaltoshiftsbetweenascertainingtopersuading.WealsodiscusspossiblewaysinwhichanattentiontothepsychologicalandsocialactivitiesinvolvedinthedevelopmentoftheCAPmightinformresearchandinstruction.
Paper
Onthevarietyofthemultiplicationprinciple’spresentationincollegetexts
ZackeryReedandEliseLockwood
TheMultiplicationPrincipleisoneofthemostfoundationalprinciplesofcounting.Unlikefoundationalconceptsinotherfields,wherethereisuniformityinpresentationacrosstextandinstruction,wehavefoundthatthereismuchvarietyinthepresentationoftheMultiplicationPrinciple.Thisposterhighlightsthemultipleaspectsofthisvariety,specificallythosewithimplicationsforthecombinatorialresearchandeducationcommunity.Suchtopicsincludethestatementtypes,languageandrepresentationofstatements,andmathematicalimplications.
Paper Assessingstudents’understandingofeigenvectorsand
eigenvaluesinlinearalgebra
KevinWatson,MeganWawro,andMichelleZandieh
ManyconceptswithinLinearAlgebraareextremelyusefulinSTEMfields;inparticulararetheconceptsofeigenvectorandeigenvalue.Throughexaminingthebodyofresearchonstudentreasoninginlinearalgebraandourownunderstandingofeigenvectorsandeigenvalues,wearedevelopingpreliminaryideasaboutaframeworkforeigentheory.Basedonthesepreliminaryideas,wearealsocreatinganassessmenttoolthatwillteststudents’understandingofeigentheory.Thisposterwillpresentourpreliminaryframework,andexamplesofthemultiple-choice-extendedquestionswehavecreatedtoassessstudentunderstanding.
Paper
6:30–9:00pmGrandBallroomSalons2-4
Usingadjacencymatricestoanalyzeaproposedlinearalgebraassessment
HayleyMilbourne,KatherineCzeranko,ChrisRasmussenandMichelleZandieh
Anassessmentofstudentlearningofmajortopicsinlinearalgebraiscurrentlybeingcreatedaspartofalargerstudyoninquiry-orientedlinearalgebra.Thisincludesboththeassessmentinstrumentandawaytounderstandtheresults.TheassessmentinstrumentismodeledoffoftheColoradoUpper-divisionElectrostatics(CUE)diagnostic(Wilcox&Pollock,2013).Therearetwopartstoeachquestion:amultiple-choicepartandanexplanationpart.Intheexplanationpart,thestudentisgivenalistofpossibleexplanationsandisaskedtoselectallthatcouldjustifytheiroriginalchoice.Thistypeofassessmentprovidesinformationontheconnectionsmadebystudents.However,analyzingtheresultsisnotstraightforward.Weproposetheuseofadjacencymatrices,asdevelopedbySelinski,Rasmussen,Wawro,&Zandieh(2014),toanalyzetheconnectionsthatstudentsdemonstrate.
Paper
8:35–9:05am
DINNERANDPLENARYSeanLarsen