Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

25
METHANOL TO GASOLINE (MTG) TECHNOLOGY An Alternative for Liquid Fuel Production Mitch Hindman ExxonMobil Research & Engineering (EMRE) World CTL Conference

description

Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

Transcript of Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

Page 1: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

METHANOL TO GASOLINE (MTG) TECHNOLOGY

An Alternative for Liquid Fuel Production

Mitch Hindman ExxonMobil Research & Engineering (EMRE)

World CTL Conference

Page 2: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

AGENDA

• Coal/Biomass to Liquid Fuels Background

• EMRE Methanol to Gasoline Technology

• MTG and Fischer-Tropsch Comparative Analysis

• EMRE MTG Licensing – The MTG Advantage

2

Page 3: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

Coal/Biomass  TO LIQUID FUELS BACKGROUND

Page 4: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

OPTIONS FOR COAL LIQUEFACTION

DirectLiquefaction

Fischer-Tropsch SynthesisCoal /

Biomass

MethanolSynthesis

“SyntheticCrude”

CH3OH

“F-T Crude”

CO2O2 H2O

Coal GasificationSyngas: H2

CO2O2

Coal GasificationSyngas: CO + 2H2

H2O

H2

Direct

Indirect

4

Page 5: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

OPTIONS FOR COAL TO LIQUID FUELS

H2

DirectLiquefaction

Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

Gasification

Gasification

Coal / Biomass

MeOHSynthesis

Refining

Gasification

MTG

Refining

LiquidFuels

5

Page 6: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

EMRE METHANOL TO GASOLINE TECHNOLOGY

Page 7: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• MTG reactions de-hydrate methanol and convert the available carbon and hydrogen into various hydrocarbons

• The “Shape Selective” MTG catalyst limits the synthesis reactions to 10 carbons

• The result is sulfur free gasoline with a typical 92 Research Octane

• The first MTG plant was operated in New Zealand from 1985 to 1997 converting natural gas to gasoline

EXXONMOBIL MTG TECHNOLOGY

Methanol

Water

Gasoline

7

Page 8: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

MTG REACTION PATH

8

2 CH3OH CH3OCH3 + H20

CH3OH, CH3OCH3 Light Olefins + H20

Light Olefins C5+ Olefins

Paraffins NaphthenesAromatics

C5+ Olefins

Methanol Di-Methyl Ether

Methanol,

Gasoline

Di-Methyl Ether

Page 9: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

MTG YIELDS AND PROPERTIES/COMPOSITION

9

MTG GASOLINE YIELDS

Percent of Feed

Percent of Hydrocarbon

Product

Gas 1% 2%

LPG 5% 11%

Gasoline 38% 87%

H2O 56% -

MTG GASOLINE  PROPERTIES/COMPOSITION

Octane, RON 92Octane, MON 82(R+M)/2 87Paraffins, vol% 53Olefins, vol% 12Naphthenes, vol% 9Aromatics, vol% 26Benzene, vol% 0.3Sulfur nil

Page 10: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• Methanol is fed to a fixed bed reactor system where all of the methanol is converted to hydrocarbon and water

• MTG reactor effluent is separated into gas, raw gasoline and water

• Raw gasoline is separated into LPG, light gasoline & heavy gasoline

• Heavy gasoline is hydro-treated to reduce durene content

• Heavy and light gasoline are re-combined into finished MTG gasoline

EMRE MTG PROCESS

10

Page 11: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

EMRE MTG PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

LPG

Light Gasoline

Treated Gasoline

Heavy Gasoline

MTG Reactor System

(Multiple)

C2-

Stabilized Gasoline

LPG

DeEthanizer

Stabilizer

StabilizerSplitter

HGT Reactor

Methanol

Purge Gas

RawGasoline

FinishedGasolineBlending

H2O

11

Page 12: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

NEW ZEALAND MTG FACILITY: NEW PLYMOUTH NZ

14,500 BPD plant in New Plymouth New Zealand. Plant ownership 75% NZ Government and 25% ExxonMobil.

MTGMTGSynGas and SynGas and MeOH GenerationMeOH Generation

12

Page 13: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• The New Zealand MTG experience demonstrated MTG to be a robust technology

• Daily gasoline yield and octane indicated a very consistent process performance

• After start up the unit ran reliably with an on-stream factor greater than 96%

NEW ZEALAND PLANT OPERATING EXPERIENCE

Initial Startup: October, 1985> 96% Stream Factor over 7 year period

70%75%80%85%

90%95%

100%

0 360 720 1080 1440 1800 2160 2520 2880

Elapsed Time, Days

Rx

Stre

am F

acto

r

GASOLINE OCTANE, RON

90

92

94

96

1st Calendar Year

85

90

95 GASOLINE YIELDWT% OF HC

1st Calendar Year

13

Page 14: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• Operability

– Gas phase conventional fixed bed reactors

– On-stream MTG catalyst regeneration and replacement

– Gasoline production is de-coupled from syngas generation and methanol

synthesis -- Improves on-stream factor vs. direct coupled operation

KEY MTG FEATURES

14

Page 15: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• Second Generation Design based on 10 yearslearning's from New Zealand operation

• Improved heat integration

• Improved process efficiency

2ND GENERATION MTG TECHNOLOGY

Ongoing 2nd Generation MTG Catalyst Research

ExxonMobil is the world leader In catalyst development and manufacture

15

Page 16: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

World’s First Coal to Liquids Plant using MTG

16

• First 2nd generation MTG: JAMG plant in Shanxi Province China

• Start Up; June 2009, 2,500 B/D gasoline

MTG Unit

Page 17: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• DKRW announced in Dec. 2007 the first U.S. CTL plant to utilize MTG in their 15 KBD Medicine Bow, WY Project

• Synthesis Energy Systems in September, 2008 announced their license for MTG Technology for a series of global CTL projects

OTHER MTG LICENSES

17

Page 18: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

MTG AND FISCHER‐TROPSCH COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Page 19: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

FISCHER-TROPSCH

MTG

F-T & MTG COMPARATIVE STOICHIOMETRY

(CO + 2H2) (-C1H2-) + H2O

SYN GAS

Gas & F-T Liquids

(CO + 2H2) CH3OH (-C1H2-) + H2O

SYN GAS METHANOL

Gas & MTG Gasoline

19

Page 20: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• F-T yields depend on catalyst, temperature and specific technology• F-T processes produce a range of hydrocarbons that require refining

processes to convert F-T liquids to conventional fuels• MTG produces a conventional gasoline and an LPG stream

F-T & MTG COMPONENT YIELDS

ComponentsFischer‐Tropsch 

Co Catalyst @ 220 CFischer‐Tropsch 

Fe Catalyst @ 340 C MTGFuel Gas 6 15 1.1

LPG 6 23 10.0

Naphtha 19 36

GASOLINE 88.8

Distillate/Diesel 22 16

Fuel Oil/Wax 46 5

Oxygenates 1 5

Data Sources: Sasol 2004 publication.

20

Page 21: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

0123456789

10

2010 2015 2030

MB

/D

Pet. Gasoline Pet. Diesel

Despite demand shifts to diesel and ethanol substitution, U.S. projected to remain heavily dependent on petroleum gasoline. (Source: U.S. EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2010))

Based on energy content, U.S. & Europe prices have consistently provided gasoline a premium over diesel

(Source: U.S. EIA, http://www.eia.doe.gov/state/state-energy-profiles-more-prices.cfm; http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/prices.html#Gasoline @ 5.25 MBTU/BBL, Diesel @ 5.83 MBTU/BBL: Transportation Energy Data Book)

U.S. PETROLEUM FUEL DEMAND

Gasoline - Diesel Price ($/MBTU)

Gasoline vs. Diesel as Synthesis Product

(3.5)

(3.0)

(2.5)

(2.0)

(1.5)

(1.0)

(0.5)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

$/M

BTU

FRANCE Germany U.S.

Page 22: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• Joint Study by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering as part of the America Energy Future Project

• Study included a comparative analysis of MTG and Fischer-Tropsch as alternatives for coal/biomass to liquid fuels– 50,000 bpd of transportation fuel; i.e. gasoline (no naphtha) and/or diesel

– Light fractions recycled for conversion or electric power

– Study considered impact of Carbon Capture and Sequestration

2009 STUDY:LIQUID TRANSPORTATION FUELS FROM COAL / BIOMASS*

*Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal / Biomass: Technological Status, Costs and Environmental Impact, ISBN: 0-309-13713-6, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12620.html

22

Page 23: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

• The study indicated the MTG based plant had slightly higher overall efficiency and lower construction costs

• CO2 Sequestration lowered efficiency by about 1.5% and raised costs 1.5-2%

Fischer-Tropsch No CO2 Capture

Fischer-Tropsch With CO2 Capture

MTGNo CO2 Capture

MTG With CO2 Capture

INPUT Coal, tpd (as received) 26,700 26,700 22,900 23,200OUTPUTS Diesel, bpd 28,700 28,700

Gasoline, bpd 21,290 21,290 50,000 50,000Total Liquid Fuel, bpd 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000

Electricity, MW e 427 317 145 111THERMAL EFF. (LHV) 49.1% 47.6% 54.2% 52.9%TOTAL PLANT COST ($M) 4,880 4,950 3,940 4,020

TOTAL PLANT COST ($K/bpd) 97.6 98.9 78.8 80.4EST. BREAKEVEN CRUDE PRICE ($/BBL) 56 68 47 51

2009 NRC STUDY:LIQUID TRANSPORTATION FUELS FROM COAL / BIOMASSF-T & MTG ECONOMIC COMPARISON

Data Sources: Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass, © National Academy of Sciences, 2009; http//www.nap.edu/catalog/12620.html

23

Page 24: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

MTG Licensing

Page 25: Conference 2011.1204.MTG World CTL

EMRE/Uhde Partnership Provides Full Range of Project Services

Gasification

GasolineMTG

MethanolCoal/Biomass

• EMRE Licenses Methanol to Gasoline Technology

• EMRE provides basic engineering design package for licensees to perform detailed engineering design and construction.

• EMRE provides catalysts for theMTG process.

• EMRE provides assistance for MTG start-up and troubleshooting.

• Uhde provides feasibility studies for the entire process of clean gasoline production from coal.

• Uhde Licenses PRENFLO Gasification technology

• Uhde can support other CTL/BTL technologies to meet customer’s specific needs

• Uhde can provide a range of engineering, procurement and construction services