Concierge Medicine: An Evolution in Delivery of Primary Care · QA physician who agrees to accept...
Transcript of Concierge Medicine: An Evolution in Delivery of Primary Care · QA physician who agrees to accept...
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP • Attorney Advertising • Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome • Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients • 321 N. Clark Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, IL 60654 • 312.832.4500
Concierge Medicine: An Evolution in Delivery of Primary Care
2
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Introduction
Jordan Busch, M.D. – Why and how some physicians are converting to concierge medicineMichael Blau – Structural, legal and ethical considerationsGerry Zitoli – The payors’ perspectiveJeff Butler – National developments in concierge medicine arrangements
3
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Background: Physician Financial Squeeze
-10%
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Fee Update
MEI-adjusted
RBRVS is implemented
Congress passes “sustainable growth rate” (SGR) measure to limit fee growth
Weak economy causes SGR to trigger large fee cut
Congressional action blocks deep payment cuts; mandates 1.5% increase in ’04-’05
Sources: MedPac, 2006
Annual Update in Medicare Physician FeesUS Market, 1992-2007
Volume growth generates concern and large negative payment updates
4
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Background: Physician Responses to Market Trends
Increased hours/workloadManage to a better case mix – cherry pick patients and payorsPursue revenue enhancement strategiesSeek/demand stipends
– ED call, coverage– Medical directorships– Committee participation
RelocateRetire earlySeek employmentSeek capital/technology partners and joint venturesConsolidateAlign/integrate with hospital or health systemConvert to concierge practice
5
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
5
Background: What Is Concierge Medicine?
Distinguishing features of primary care models– 300-600 patients– 24/7 availability– Same/next day appointments– Annual health/wellness assessment– Plan of care– Amenities/Enhancements– “Retainer” fee
6
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
6
BackgroundApproximately 500+ concierge practices nationally (146 identified by GAO in 2004-5)– Approximately 20 in MA– Most are adult primary care– Approximately 10% medical specialists
Cardiology, infectious disease, pediatrics, gynecology
Location– East/West Coast (MA, FLA, CA, AZ, WA)– 25 states
7
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Figure 1: Location of Concierge Physicians Identified by GAO, 2005
8
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
GAO Report: Concierge Characteristics
GAO Report (GAO-05-929; August, 2005):– Metropolitan areas– Average length of practice = 19 years– Average fee = $1500/year ($60-15,000 range)– On average 326 concierge patients per physician
(down from 2,716 patients before conversion)80% have not met enrollment goal50% met enrollment goal after 3 years
9
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
GAO Report: Concierge Characteristics
– 1/3 include some non-concierge patients– 76% participate with insurers; 21% opt-out of
Medicare
10
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Why and How Physicians Convert To Concierge Medicine
Jordan Busch, M.D.,Founder,
Personal Physicians Healthcare,Chestnut Hill, MA
11
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Premier Primary Care
Why?What?How?The Results?
12
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Premier Primary Care
Why?What?How?Results?
13
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
A Visual Summary of a Typical Primary Care Practice
14
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Disconnect Between Physician Incentives and Patient’s DesiresPhysician compensation based upon “production”Payers pay for units of production (i.e. visits)Patients value care
15
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Trends in Primary Care Trying to Stay Even
OverheadOverhead
Net Payment per Visit
Net Payment per Visit
Number of Visits
Number of Visits
16
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Paying For Experience* Medical Fee schedule payments per procedure; * Medical Fee schedule payments per procedure; all others fee schedule charges per hourall others fee schedule charges per hour
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
$500
Legal Accounting Plumbing Medical *
17
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patient Frustrations - Access to Care
Even People with health insurance– Barriers to choice of doctor and hospital– Barriers to care when and where it is wanted or
needed– Barriers to non-visit care (telephone, e-mail)– Barriers to access to your doctor (call groups,
urgent care, physician extenders)
18
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Volume vs. Quality
At some level of patient volume, different for each physician, quality and service will deteriorate.Controversy has surrounded our choice to see fewer patients.Little attention to the choice to see more?
19
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Making a Change
If… “Every system is perfectly designed to achieve exactly the results it produces”. (Edward Demming)
Then… the solution for us could only be to create a new practice design – the ideal practice
20
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Premier Primary Care
Why?What?How?
21
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Drucker on Quality
Quality in a product or service is not what the supplier puts in. It is what the customer gets out and is willing to pay for. A product is not quality because it is hard to make and costs a lot of money, as manufacturers typically believe. Customers pay only for what is of use to them and gives them value. Nothing else constitutes quality.
22
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Service Standards in Primary Care
Standard Care*– 3000 to 4000 patients
per physician– 4500 patient visits per
year– Large coverage groups– Visits average 8 minutes
of physician patient contact
Premier Care– Maximum 300 patients
per physician– 1000 patient visits per
year– On-call for our own
patients 24/7/365– 90 minute
comprehensive visits w/o overbooking or double booking
* Data Source: Affiliated Physicians Group
23
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Non-visit Care
TelephoneE-mailTeachingLiterature review / information servicesTime
24
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patient Valued Features Our Care Model
Each doctor on-call for their own patients 24/7/365Same day visits at patient’s requestNo overbooking or double bookingHouse calls when neededAccompaniment to important consultations and visits
25
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patient Valued Features Our Care Model
Enhanced communication– Open ended inquiry– Reflective listening
Increased Patient satisfactionIncreased Physician satisfactionA different style of careBetter care ?
26
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
27
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
28
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
29
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
30
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
31
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
32
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
“I’m afraid you’ve had a paradigm shift.”
33
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Premier Primary Care
Why?What?How?Results?
34
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How
It’s never as easy as it looksDetermining your patient base– If I build it, will they come…– Notifying patients in an appropriate way
Legal Issues – May affect your business structure
Developing a Business Plan that can be used to acquire financing– Financial spread sheets– Accountants
35
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How
It’s never as easy as it looksFinancing– Bank, VC, Friends?– Collateral? Your Home?
Designing and Building the SpaceDealing with the 3rd Party payers
36
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How
It’s never as easy as it looksChoosing/Implementing Appropriate Infrastructure– Software needs (EMR, Accounting)– Banking Systems– Communication systems– Staffing needs– HR to help design and administer employee benefits– Billing– Management
37
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
How
It’s never as easy as it looksAppropriate transition of patients– Those joining– Those not joining
Doing all of this while running your current practice– Where you want to dazzle patients enough to believe
that they should join your new practice
38
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Starting Point
$800,000 of debtSalary reductions of 30%3 doctors4 staff and a practice directorApproximately 270 membership patientsAn additional 90 “pro bono” patients
39
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Premier Primary Care
Why?What?HowThe Results
40
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Growth
Predicted– 2002: 520 patients– 2003: 800 patients
Actual– 2002: Approx 600 patients– 2003: Approx 820 patients– 2004: Approx 900 patient– 2005 rate increase– 2007 rate increase– 2008 physician added/1100 patients– 2009 ???
41
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Patient Satisfaction
Enjoy the ease of communication – they can reach their doctor!Ease of appointmentsAssistance with arranging specialty appointmentAppreciate the value of specialists knowing their history in advance of the appointment
42
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Satisfaction
Over 100% Re-enrollment– Less than 1% have chosen not to re-enroll
Searching for a doctor who can “solve” their problemMoved out of state
– Often re-enrollments have been accompanied by requests to have other family member join
43
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Satisfaction
Professional:– Great job in a great environment – I love going to work– Time to spend with patients– Time to follow up with patients – Time to follow up with specialists– Time to read about diseases– Elimination of unnecessary “after hours” calls – Feel that patients respect and value our time– Feel that we are able to effectively partner with patients– I go home feeling that I have done my job to the best of
my ability
44
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Structural, Legal and Ethical Considerations
Michael Blau, Esq.
45
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
45
Business/Ethical ConsiderationsConsumer choicePersonalized health carePreventive medicineResponsiveAmenitiesPatient satisfactionPhysician satisfactionMore community activitiesBetter economicsBetter outcomes?Insurance “wrap-around”?
Impact on accessProliferation concernAbuse potentialVoluntariness?Incentive to overutilize?Two levels of care?Reduction of patient panelSkills erosion?Loss of patient diversity?Adverse selectionImpact on referral sources?Access to specialists?Lack of coordination with health systemPayor risksRegulatory risks
Pros Cons
46
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
46
Ethical ConsiderationsAMA Council on Judicial and Ethical Affairs (Report 3-A-03)– Voluntary participation, no undue pressure– Facilitate continuity of care for terminated patients– Do not claim better quality– No medically unnecessary services to appease
patients– Separate amenities from covered health services to
avoid patient confusion– Seek opportunities to provide services to indigents
47
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
47
Regulatory ConsiderationsBan on balance billing/double billing– Medicaid/Medicare (unless opt-out)
A physician who agrees to accept assignment of Medicare benefits “agrees to accept the Medicare payment as payment in full for the services furnished to the beneficiary and is precluded from charging the beneficiary more than the deductible and coinsurance based on the approved Medicare fee amount. 42 C.F.R. §402 (definition of “assignment”)Breach of terms of assignment agreement by charging for Medicare covered service, violates Civil Monetary Penalty Law (42 U.S.C. §1320a-7a(a)(2)(A) and (B))Penalty is $10,000 per violation; up to 3 times amount charged; potential exclusion
48
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
48
Regulatory Considerations– State insurance and consumer protection statutes
“No participating physician . . . shall charge to or collect from a subscriber or covered dependent any amount in excess of the amount of compensation determined and allowed by an [insurance carrier] pursuant to the applicable method of compensation approved by the commissioner”, other than for deductibles, copayments and coinsurance. G.L. c. 176B, §7; 176G, §21&22, 1760, §6&7, 176I, §1; 211 C.M.R. §52.12(8)
– Terms of participation agreements– Retainer fee must be structured so as not to involve
balance billing/double billing“Retainer” fee must pay for noncovered services and amenitiesNon-covered administrative vs. non-covered healthcare servicesGrey area between what is covered and what is not
49
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Concierge fee cannot cover Medicare co-payments and deductibles– Balance bill (if in excess of applicable copays/
deductibles)– Beneficiary inducement in violation of CMP Law (if
less than applicable copays/deductibles)
50
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
50
Regulatory ConsiderationsCMS Position – No prohibition of properly structured arrangements
– Tommy Thompson “no action” letter (March 26, 2002)– OIG Special Fraud Alert (March 31, 2004)
“Charging extra fees for already covered services abuses the trust of Medicare patients by making them pay again for services already paid for by Medicare”
– 2 OIG SettlementsR. Douglas Thorsen, M.D., Minnesota ($53,400 CMP settlement) - Services offered for $600 fee included coordination of care with other providers, a comprehensive assessment and plan for optimum health and extra time spent on patient care (07-28-2003)
51
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
51
Regulatory Considerations
Lee R. Rocamora, M.D., North Carolina, ($106,600 CMP settlement) – Membership fee in exchange for (1) annual comprehensive physical exam, (2) same day or next day appointments, (3) support personnel dedicated exclusively to members, (4) 24/7 physician availability, (5) prescription facilitation, and (6) coordinating and expediting referrals (05-15-2007)Not clear which services OIG found to be covered by Medicare
52
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
52
Regulatory Considerations– “Neither [the 2003 settlement] nor the OIG
Alert takes a position on concierge-care or boutique-medicine” (Jennifer Leonardo, Senior Counsel, OIG, 4/26/04)
– GAO Report (05-992) finds no adverse impact on Medicare beneficiary access and confirms that concierge practice is permissible under Medicare statutes as long as concierge fee is not for Medicare covered services
53
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Legitimate concierge financial models– Nonparticipation, to extent permitted by state law
Can opt-out of commercial insurance and balance billPhysicians who opt-out of Medicare in Massachusetts cannot charge in excess of the Medicare allowable (G.L. c. 112, §2; BORM Advisory Ruling AR-1998-1)Opting-out of Medicare in MA does not solve the Medicare balance billing problem
– Participate and charge for noncovered amenities only (not for any professional services)
– Participate and charge for noncovered amenities (including noncovered professional services)
54
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Participation/Nonparticipation– Nonparticipation may impair marketability of
concierge practice– Nonparticipating physician cannot serve as PCP
gatekeeper (e.g., cannot authorize in-network referrals)
– Nonparticipating specialist may jeopardize conventional practice
55
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
– Nonparticipating physician will be treated as an out-of-network provider, whose services will be subject to higher copays
– Nonparticipation may jeopardize ability to participate at other locations
– Nonparticipation does not resolve Medicare double billing issue in MA
For these reasons, 76% participate nationally
56
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Participation Model: Structural Considerations
Patient/Member
MD(s)
BusinessEntity
PracticeEntity
MembershipAgreement
Doctor/PatientRelationship
• Professional Services• Accepts insurer payment as payment in full, subject to copay, co-insurance, deductibles
AdministrativeAgreement
Ownershipor ContractOwnership
• Not authorized to practice medicine• Provides amenities• Charges retainer fee
57
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Spending Account (FSA, HRA, MSA, HSA) Reimburseability– Eligible medical expenses– Fee for noncovered medical services may be
reimbursable– Fee for noncovered administrative enhancements
are not reimbursable– Trade-off between balance billing compliance and
spending account reimbursement
58
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
58
Participation Model
LowModerateHighLegal Risk
Type of ServiceCovered Professional Services
NoncoveredProfessional Services
NoncoveredAmenities/Enhancements
Examples of Service
E.g.; Office visits24/7 availabilityER visitsAnnual health
assessment?
E.g.Screening examsTelephone/email
consults
E.g.Communication/Internet
tools“Arranging for” functionNonmedical items (e.g.,
discounted health club membership, nutritious snacks, exercise physiology testing by personal trainer)
Charge/Payment
Accept health insurance as payment in full, subject to copays, deductibles
No health insurance coverage;within or outside concierge fee?
Concierge fee
Spending Account Reimbursement Yes Yes No
59
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Discrimination – Concierge program must not discriminate on a prohibited basis– Concierge practices generally do not violate
nondiscrimination provisions since participation is offered to all who are able and willing to pay
– Concierge practices do not discriminate based on payment source
– Discrimination vs. free enterprise
60
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Regulatory Considerations
Business of Insurance– Service contract for nonmedical services vs.
insurance contract– Should not be a prepaid health plan that assumes
risk of cost of services provided by third parties or spreads actuarial risk among a pool of patients
Consumer protection– Avoid consumer confusion– Avoid misrepresentations and false advertising
61
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
61
Regulatory ConsiderationsHMO licensure and accreditation – All states other than NJ and NY permit payors to contract with concierge practices– Mass. DOI Ruling, March 6, 2002 - HMOs can
contract with concierge practices consistent with G.L. c. 176G
Status with payors – Where permitted, most payors will do business with concierge practices; some will not– Aetna?; CIGNA?; United (NC); Anthem (VA)– Payor contract terms
62
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
62
Current Regulatory Status
AMA Ethical Standards – CJEA Report 3-A-03GAO Report, 05-929 – no adverse impact to date on Medicare access; consistent with Medicare requirements as long as fee is not for any Medicare covered serviceCMS no-action position; but OIG AlertDivisions of Insurance – Regulatory approval by MA DOI; No regulatory disapproval except NJ and NYPhysician Licensing Boards – No regulatory disapproval, but in MA cannot opt-out of Medicare and bill in excess of Medicare allowable
63
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Current Regulatory Status
Payor positions – MA payors generally willing to accommodate, with some possible national payor exceptions
64
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Current Regulatory Status
Legislative responses– 2002: U.S. Senate Bill 1606 (Sen. Kennedy), H.R.
345 – Not enacted – Section 650 of MMA (Dec. 8, 2003): GAO Study by
June 2005– State anti-concierge medicine bills filed in MA
(2003-5), but not enacted; sent to study commission in 2005
65
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
The Payor Perspective
Gerry Zitoli, Esq.Assistant General Counsel,
Tufts Health Plan
66
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
The Payor PerspectiveStatus with payors – Most payors will do business with concierge practices; some national payors will notHMO licensure and accreditation – Mass. DOI Ruling, March 6, 2002 – HMOs can contract with
concierge practices consistent with G.L. c. 176GDisclose contracts to DOIContract must assure that patients are not charges for covered services, other than copays, co-insurance and deductiblesHMO must amend provider directory to designate concierge practices
67
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
The Payor Perspective
HMO must make clear to enrollees that concierge services are not covered by planContract must require advance notice by provider before establishing a concierge practice
– Terms of participation agreementsNo balance billingNo discrimination based on source of paymentNo access fees?Anti-concierge clauses
68
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
National DevelopmentsIn Concierge Medicine
Arrangements
Jeff Butler,Founder and President,
Privia Health
69
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
69
National Concierge Networks
MDVIP – 285 (National)Concierge Choice Physicians – 79 (National)F&L – 40 (Regional/national)PartnerMD – 5 (Virginia)MD2 – 2 (Seattle)SignatureMD
70
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
70
MDVIP
Founded in Nov 2000Headquarters in Boca Raton, FLFounder - Edward Goldman, MD280 physicians in 26 states95,000+ patients2004 investment by Summit Partners (Boston)2007 minority investment by Procter & GamblePatient membership fees - $1500 to $1800 per year
– $1000 to doctor, $500 to MDVIP– $1000 x 400 patients = $400k per year in retainers
71
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
71
MDVIP - Services to MDTransition:
Patient demographic analysisPatient telephone surveyInitial & follow-up direct mailingsHost patient education seminars (local country club/hotel)MDVIP sales rep in officeProcessing membership enrollments (phone, mail)MD staff support (staff model, training, etc)
Ongoing:Membership maintenance - billing & collectionsMDVIP Branding and ongoing marketing for practiceElectronic Medical RecordsAfter hours call center support
72
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
72
MDVIP - SwaTStrengths:
Significant traction and year over year growthScale (95,000 patients x $1500 year = $142M in revenue95%+ patient satisfaction reported95%+ patient retention reportedBy far the most experience doing conversions in the industry
Threats:Value to doctors post conversion?
– Pricing pressure at contract renewal?
$1500+ price point in recession?# physicians with demographics to achieve full practice conversions# physicians who are willing to do full practice conversions
73
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
73
Privia Health
Physician practice development company1. Improve quality & patient experience2. Increase practice income (new revenue sources, cost savings from economies of scale)3. Win back physicians time (rightsize practice, smart technology, midlevels)
Branded network of top physicians– High quality (“best doctors”, Mayo Clinic affiliation)– Service excellence (Ritz Carlton training)
New Revenue: Membership models– Limited participation of existing patients– “Inch deep and mile wide”– Combines concierge benefits with “medical home” coordination
Personal Health Advisors (care coordination, coaching, health advocacy)Nutrition & Fitness AssessmentsWellness PlansOnline access to health records & wellness tools, etc, etc
74
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
74
Trends to Watch
Medical home– Health plans expansion of “covered services” (Kaiser, etc)– Medicare medical home pilots
Impact of economy– Concierge patient retention rates– % of successful conversions
Consumer Driven Plans– Will a tipping point be reached?
75
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Concluding Remarks
76
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
76
What Does the Future Hold?
“It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.”
Yogi Berra
77
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
77
What Does the Future Hold?Other legislative responses?– Obama administration health reform– Priorities are coverage expansion, access,
affordability, quality improvement, HIT adoption and cost control
– Easy political target for liberal Democrats?
Consistent with trend toward consumerism and consumer directed healthcareWild card -- Universal health care?European-style public/private system?
78
©2009 Foley & Lardner LLP
Speakers
Jordan Busch, M.D.Personal Physicians HealthCare,
Michael L. Blau, Esq.Foley & Lardner [email protected]
Gerry Zitoli, Associate General Counsel
Tufts Associated Health Plans, Inc.
Jeff Butler, Chairman & CEOPrivia [email protected]