Concepts Drive Change - Support for the Soldier · Concepts Drive Change 1. ... Maritime, Space,...
Transcript of Concepts Drive Change - Support for the Soldier · Concepts Drive Change 1. ... Maritime, Space,...
Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete
AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018
Concepts Drive Change
1
Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete
AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018
2
Threats Layer “Stand-off”
Combined Arms Armies employ organic long-, mid-, and short-range systems to create
operational and tactical stand-off that requires attacking functions rather than formations
Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete
AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018
Describes three interrelated ways to achieve strategic objectives:
➢Expand the competition space on favorable terms (preferred method)
If necessary:
➢Win a short conflict by denying initial enemy objectives and achieving
an operational position of advantage
➢Win a protracted conflict by regaining the operational initiative and
defeating enemy forces
3
Army forces, as an element of the Joint Force, conduct Multi-Domain
Operations to prevail in competition; when necessary, Army forces
penetrate and dis-integrate enemy anti-access and area denial
systems and exploit the resultant freedom of maneuver to achieve
strategic objectives (win) and force a return to competition on
favorable terms.
Central Idea
Element AirLand Battle Multi-Domain Operations
Operational
Environment
Single Pacing Threat (Soviet Union) Multiple Threats across the OE with similar
operation approaches (near-peers)
Focus Formations (Second Echelon) Systems (Anti-Access and Area Denial
Systems)
Operational Context Forward postured force in prepared
defense
CONUS-based force executing offensive
action through strategic and operational
maneuver
Central Idea Engage throughout the depth of the
battlefield; defeat the Second Echelon
Compete in all domains; when necessary,
penetrate and dis-integrate enemy anti-
access and area denial systems and exploit
the resultant freedom of maneuver to
achieve strategic objectives (win) and force a
return to competition
Domains Land, Air (synchronization) Land, Air, Maritime, Space, Cyber (synergy)
Echelon Corps/Division and below Inter-Agency, Theater and below
Phases Phased operations in armed conflict Across competition continuum
Concept
AirLand Battle and Multi-Domain Operations: What is the Difference?
21
UNCLASSIFIED // FOUO
Multi-Domain OperationsEvolutionary Concept with Revolutionary Impacts
5
Complex, Hyper-Competition, Near-Peer gains.…
Joint Integration
Convergence of Capabilities
Cross-Domain Synergy
Multiple Dilemmas
Innovative Teams
SPACE
AIR
CYBERSPACE
LAND
MARITIME
6UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
UK/US Interoperability RoadmapVision: UK division to operate effectively within a US Corps; UK brigade operating
effectively within a US division; US BCT operating effectively within a UK division; US division
operating effectively within UK-framework NATO Allied Rapid Reaction Corps
Events to enhance interoperability: JWA, WFX, GORT (Strat & Modernisation), ASTs, CRC-A
Timeline
Focus
Area
2020 2019 2018 2021 2022+
CIS/IM
Intel / ISR
Fusion*
Digital Fires
Sustainment
AM&E
S&T
ASCA CD
(WFX 18.4)
FC BISA 4.0
Release 1
UK FMN
(Ex IR)
US MPE
(WFX /
JWA)
FC BISA 4.0
Release 2
DCGS-A
WEB
(WFX 18.4)
DCGS-A
IPS
(WFX 19.4)
Integrated
Intel
(TBC)
UK Data
Repository
(IOC)
* Intel sharing continues in sp of real world ops
UK Data
Repository
(FOC)
Automated
Commodity
Sharing (2023)
Present CGA
methodology
(SCM 18)
CS Standard, Log C4I
& RSOM Validation
(Ex TJ & JWA 19.1)
Commodity
Sharing
StandardRSOM
CONOP
Log C4I CD
(WFX 18.4)
Present
CGAInterop
lessons
exploitation
presn to
GORT
Present
CGA
CRC-A CRC-A CRC-A CRC-A
7UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete
AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018
8
Multi-Domain Operations Solution
Compete Penetrate Dis-Integrate Exploit Re-Compete
AUSA v7, 4 OCT 2018
9
Modernization Framework
Thread of Continuity
Sustain
(Enduring)
Delay/Reduce
(Trade-off)
Invest/
Accelerate
(New)
DivestXNear
(now-2025)
Mid
(2026-2035)
Far
(2036-2050)
POM YEARS
(Publish Annual Mission Guidance – top down- for
FFME that prioritizes and puts into action the
AMS ) OE/ Pacing Threat Russian New Generation Warfare
(RNGW) 2018 202810 Year Plan
Experiments/Exercises
Concept
The Army needs a threat/OE based, operationally
driven framework for modernization
(AMS 1.5, ACP, …a single, nested narrative)
Feedback
Army Mod
Strategy
1.5
*
*Note: AMS 1.5 must address a comprehensive DOTMLPF-P modernization plan; the current AMS is “M” focused while CAC has sought to maintain doctrinal change commensurate with capability.
Ideally, the AMS becomes an Army guidance document driving the entire enterprise across the ACOMs…potentially serving as the modernization chapter to the ACP
D
O
T
M
L
P
F
P
Mod Strategy*
(AMS 1.0 Insufficient
- “M” focused)
April 2019
“The Army of 2028 will be ready to deploy, fight and win decisively against any adversary, anytime and anywhere,
in a joint, multi-domain, high-intensity conflict, while simultaneously deterring others and maintaining its ability to
conduct irregular warfare”
- SEC Mark Esper, GEN Mark Milley
NSS/NDS/
NMS