Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
-
Upload
sarah-burstein -
Category
Documents
-
view
230 -
download
0
Transcript of Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
1/103
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
ORLANDO DIVISION
CONAIR CORPORATION and
BABYLISS FACO SPRL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BARBAR, INC. and DOMINIC BARBAR,
Defendants.
CASE No. 6:14-CV-831-ORL-31-TBS
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
(INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DEMANDED)DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiffs Conair Corporation (Conair) and Babyliss FACO SPRL (Babyliss)
complain of defendants BARBAR, Inc. (BARBAR) and Dominic Barbar (Mr.
Barbar)as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a) because this is anaction for infringement of Conair and Babyliss patent rights and for violation of Section
43(a) of the Lanham Trademark Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). This Court has supplemental
jurisdiction of Plaintiffs claim under Florida law pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(a).
2. Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida and in thisjudicial district and division because they have transacted business here by selling,
offering to sell or distributing hair care products (the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
and/or the BARBAR 2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron) that violate Conairs and Babylisss
intellectual property rights, and regularly attending trade fairs in Orlando, Florida. As
discussed below, this includes BARBARs upcoming attendance at Booth 2451 of the
Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event scheduled for May 31-June 2, 2014.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
2/103
2
3. Venue is proper under the general federal venue statute, 28 U.S.C. 1391(d), and under the specific venue provision relating to patent-infringement cases, 28
U.S.C. 1400(b).
PARTIES
4. Conair is a Delaware corporation headquartered in East Windsor, NewJersey, with sales and marketing offices in Stamford, Connecticut. Conair is the exclusive
licensee and owns all substantial rights in and has standing (without joining the nominal
legal title owner) to sue for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,607,804, entitled
Hair Styling Aid(the 804 patent) and 8,651,118, entitled Hair Styling Device(the
118 patent). Conair holds the exclusive license, including the exclusive right to
manufacture, market and enforce, from TF3 Limited (Birmingham, England). Conair has
complied with all terms of its exclusive license, and that exclusive license is currently in
force.
5. Babyliss is a subsidiary of Conair, and is organized under the laws ofBelgium. It is headquartered and has offices at 25 avenue lindependence 4020, Wandre
(Liege), Belgium. Babyliss is the owner and has standing to sue for infringement of
United States Design Patent D696,456, entitled, Hair Styling Apparatus (the 456
patent).
6. BARBAR is a California corporation with U.S. offices at 9663 SantaMonica Blvd., Suite 600, Beverly Hills, California. BARBAR has previously and is
presently making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the U.S. hair
styling devices that infringe one or more claims of the 804, 118 and 456 patents (the
patents-in-suit). BARBAR has infringed the patents-in-suit either directly or through
acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271.
7. Mr. Barbar is, on information and belief, a resident of California and themanager, chief executive officer, and owner of BARBAR. Mr. Barbar has previously and
is presently making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing into the U.S. hair
styling devices that infringe one or more claims of the 804, 118 and 456 patents (the
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
3/103
3
patents-in-suit), including the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR
2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron. Mr. Barbar has infringed the patents-in-suit either
directly or through acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation of 35
U.S.C. 271.
BACKGROUND
8. Conair acquired the exclusive license to the 804 and 118 patents on June7, 2011, and has worked diligently to commercialize the inventions claimed within them.
The 804 and 118 patents, through the inventions embodied in their claims, permit one -
step hair styling and curling, thus saving consumers substantial time and effort. As part of
Conairs commercialization efforts, Conair designer Pierre L. Julemont (working at
Conairs Belgian Babyliss subsidiary) perfected a sleek, novel and consumer-friendly
ornamental design to enclose embodiments of the 804 and 118 patents. That ornamental
design is embodied in the 456 patent.
9. As a result of Conairs commercialization efforts, Conair and itssubsidiaries have experienced dramatic commercial success worldwide with its
embodiments of those patents the Miracurl (promoted under the Babyliss brand) and
Figure 1 of the '456 Patent
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
4/103
4
the Curl Secret (promoted under the Conair brand). That success has attracted a number
of knock-off efforts and attempts to free ride on Conairs success. Defendants are now
among them.
10. BARBAR sells hair styling devices, including on its websitesbarbarartist.com, globalsalon.com and dominicbarbar.com. Mr. Barbar, as the chief
officer of BARBAR, controls, directs, encourages and induces BARBAR to sell such
devices, including the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR 2008
Digital Auto Curling Iron (the accused devices). BARBAR and Mr. Barbar intend to
sell and/or offer for sale the accused devices at the upcoming May 31 to June 2, 2014
Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event, at Booth 2451. To an ordinary observer,
those accused devices appear substantially and confusingly similar to Conairs
commercial patented products, and to Conairs patented design:
11. Conair owns distinctive, aesthetic, non-functional trade dress in its InfinityPro by Conair Curl Secret (Curl Secret) hair curling product. Conair has used this
Defendants Accused Product
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
5/103
5
trade dress consistently in its marketing, including on its websites located on the internet
at www.curlsecret.com, www.miracurlpro.com and Error! Hyperlink reference not
valid.
12. The trade dress of the Curl Secret is recognizable by its color which is avery deep, dark purple, almost black in appearance. The trade dress is also recognizable
by the positioning of the controls for the Curl Secret which are located on the left side of
the products lower appendage facing left when held in a stylists right hand during
normal use. The trade dress is also recognizable in the unique shape of the Curl Secret,
including its round bulbous clam-shell head and its sleek handle, as well as its swiveling
truncated-cone power cord attachment where the cord trails away from the unit at a
greater-than-90 degree angle, and has flexible ribs at the nearest part to the attachment.
The trade dress for Miracurl is nearly identical, with three buttons instead of two, and
aqua/teal coloring instead of deep purple.
13. The Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress symbolize the quality of theConair products, and have become distinctive to Conair through widespread use and
advertising, which has exposed the Conair Curl Secret and Miracurl to many people,
especially in the hair care industry. Conair has used the Curl Secret and Miracurl trade
dress in a consistent and continuous fashion in commerce though its website, in print
marketing material, and on the websites and marketing material of its authorized dealers
throughout the United States.
14. The Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress is aesthetic and non-functional,and through consistent and continuous use it has come to identify the Conair Curl Secret
and Miracurl products, and the public recognizes the trade dress and associates it with
Conair and its Curl Secret and Miracurl products. The trade dress has become an asset of
substantial value and is strongly associated with a single product line and source, namely
the Conair Curl Secret and Miracurl products.
15. As can be seen in the photographs below, Defendants have copied andused the Curl Secret and Miracurl trade dress in connection with their advertising and
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5
http://www.curlsecret.com/http://www.curlsecret.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.miracurlpro.com/http://www.curlsecret.com/ -
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
6/103
6
marketing of the confusingly similar accused devices in interstate commerce with the
intention of misleading, deceiving or confusing consumers as to the origin of the accused
products while trading on Conairs reputation and good will.
Two views of Conair's Product
Two views of Defendants InfringingProduct
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
7/103
7
16. The infringement by Defendants of the Curl Secret and Miracurl tradedress is likely to cause confusion, deception, and mistake among consumers and potential
consumers of the Conair Curl Secret product.
17. Conair has informed Defendants of its and its subsidiarysrights under thepatents-in-suit, and requested that they immediately cease and desist the infringing
activities. On May 9, 2014, in-house counsel for Conair wrote a letter to Mr. Barbar
naming, among others, the patents-in-suit, identifying the infringement by the accused
products, and demanding that he immediately cease and desist all sales, marketing,
advertising and website listings of the product, and any substantially similar product, and
that you destroy or turn over to us your unsold inventory. On May 28, 2014, Conair
management learned that, rather than cease-and-desist, instead Defendants planned to
display the accused products at the Premiere Orlando International Beauty Event from
May 31 to June 2, 2014, and seek orders that compete directly with Conairs patented
commercial embodiments. Conair will also attend the same show.
18. On information and belief, Defendants intend to sell or offer the accusedproducts for sale for a retail price well below the usual retailprice of Conairs patented
products. Defendants threaten to have their accused products sold at retail for less than
$80 per unit, while Conairs products usually sell at retail for over $140 per unit.
COUNT I
UTILITY PATENT INFRINGEMENT
19. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.
20. Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 804 and 118patents either directly or indirectly through acts of contributory infringement or
inducement in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271, by making, using, selling, importing and/or
offering to sell infringing products, namely the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
8/103
8
the BARBAR 2008 Digital Auto Curling Iron. Additional infringing models may be
identified through discovery.
21. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured Conair and it, therefore, is entitled to recover damages adequate to
compensate it for such infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.
22. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has been willful and deliberate because Defendants have notice of or knew of the
804 and 118 patentsand have nonetheless injured and will continue to injure Conair,
unless and until this Court enters an injunction, which prohibits further infringement and
specifically enjoins further manufacture, use, sale, importation and/or offer for sale of
products or services that come within the scope of the 804 and 118 patents.
COUNT II
DESIGN PATENT INFRINGEMENT
23. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.
24.
Defendants have infringed and continue to infringe the 456 patenteither
directly or indirectly through acts of contributory infringement or inducement in violation
of 35 U.S.C. 271 by making, using, selling, importing and/or offering to sell infringing
products, namely the BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron and/or the BARBAR 2008
Digital Auto Curling Iron. Additional infringing models may be identified through
discovery.
25. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured Babyliss and it, therefore, is entitled to recover damages adequate to
compensate it for such infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty.
26. Defendantsinfringement, contributory infringement and/or inducement toinfringe has injured and will continue to injure Babyliss, unless and until this Court enters
an injunction, which prohibits further infringement and specifically enjoins further
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
9/103
9
manufacture, use, sale, importation and/or offer for sale of products or services that come
within the scope of the 456 patent.
COUNT III
FEDERAL TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT/UNFAIR COMPETITION
27. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.
28. Defendant's activities complained of herein constitute infringement ofConairs trade dress and unfair competition in violation of 15 U.S.C. 1125(a) to the
injury and detriment of Plaintiffs.
29. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants infringement, Conair hassuffered and will continue to suffer loss of income, profits and good will and defendants
will continue to unfairly acquire income, profits, and good will.
COUNT IV
COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION
30. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1through18 of this complaint as if fully set forth herein.
31. Defendants activities complained of herein constitute unfair methods ofcompetition in violation of the common law of the State of Florida.
32. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants competition, Conair hassuffered and will continue to suffer loss of income, profits and good will and defendants
will continue to unfairly acquire income, profits, and good will.
JURY DEMAND
Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Conair requests a
trial by jury on all issues presented that can properly be tried to a jury.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
10/103
10
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Conair and Babyliss ask this Court to enter judgment against
Defendants and against their subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all
persons in active concert or participation with them, granting the following relief:
A. An injunction preliminarily and permanently prohibiting furtherinfringement, inducement and contributory infringement of the patents-in-
suit;
B. An award of damages adequate to compensate Conair and Babyliss for theinfringement that has occurred, together with prejudgment interest from
the date infringement began;
C. All other damages permitted by 35 U.S.C. 284;D. Additional damages as expressly provided for in the case of a design
patent under 35 U.S.C. 289;
E. A finding that this case is exceptional and an award to Conair of itsattorneys fees and costs as providedby 35 U.S.C. 285;
F. An award of costs; andG. Such other and further relief as this Court or a jury may deem proper and
just.
Dated: May 30, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Joel B. Rothman
Joel B. [email protected]
Florida Bar No. 98220
Schneider Rothman IP Law Group
4651 North Federal HighwayBoca Raton, Florida 33431
voice: 561.404.4350fax: 561.404.4353
Of counsel:
Robert P. [email protected]
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
11/103
11
William W. Flachsbart
Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC
333 N. Michigan Ave., 27th
Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone: 312-551-9500Fax: 312-551-9501
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
Conair Corporation and Babyliss FACO
SPRL
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
12/103
!"#$%$& (
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 12
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
13/103
The groundbreaking innovations that made infiniti Pro by Conair
Curl Secretthe first-ever appliance to win the WWD Product of
the Year award did not happen by accident. Conair put millions of
dollars worth of time and resources into the patented technology
and proprietary design that let this revolutionary new retail styler,
and its professional counterpart, automatically create a perfect curl.
Conair Corporation is the sole owner of worldwide patents andtrademarks for Curl Secret.These legal entities protect both Conair
and our retail partners from the dangers and liabilities of poor-quality
imitations that may not follow safety guidelines. Conair cares about
the safety of its consumers and has conducted rigorous testing to
ensure the safety and integrity of these products. Poor quality
imitations and counterfeit electrical hair appliances have exhibited
significant defects and can cause serious harm to consumers and/or
damage to their homes or other property if left undetected.
Conair is actively working with local, state, federal and international
law enforcement, as well as U.S. and foreign customs officials, to stop
the sale of counterfeit goods. All legitimate Conair styling appliances
are protected by granted and/or pending patents.
We are proud to partner with reputable companies that are as
dedicated as we are to ensuring the legitimacy, quality and safety
of products that carry our name.
CONAIR CORPORATION ONE CUMMINGS PO INT ROAD STAMFORD CT 06902 203.351.9000
Conair Granted Patents
for Award-Winning Styler
PATENTS granted and/or pending include U.S. Patents 8,607,804, XXXXXXX,
and XXXXXXX. BABYLISS,BABYLISSPRO,MIRACURL,CURL SECRET,CURL
GENIUS,PERFECT CURL,RUSK MIRACURL,and CURLMATICare trademarks
of Conair Corporation. 2014 Conair Corporation. All rights reserved.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 13
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
14/103
!"#$%$& (
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-2 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 14
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
15/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-2 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 15
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
16/103
!"#$%$& (
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-3 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID 16
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
17/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-3 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 2 PageID 17
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
18/103
!"#$%$& (
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID 18
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
19/103
IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT COUNTERFEIT RUSK MIRACURL STYLERS
RUSK MIRACURL STYLER
The RUSK MiraCurl styler was developed by Conair Corporation and utilizes a significant investment of time, effort and money.
This innovative product is based on patented technology and a proprietary design, which allows professional stylists to automatically
create one perfect curl after another -consistently, effortlessly, safely.
WE CARE ABOUT YOUR SAFETY
Conair Corporation has obtained worldwide patents and trademarks* for the MiraCurl styler and is serious about enforcing its rights
against sellers, importers and makers of counterfeit and imitation goods. Conair and RUSK care deeply about the safety of salon
professionals and their clients. We conduct rigorous testing to ensure the safety and integrity of our products. Poor -quality imitations
and counterfeit electrical hair appliances have exhibited significant defects that can cause serious harm to users and/or damage to their
businesses or other property.
Conair is actively working with local, federal and international law enforcement, as well as Australian and foreign customs officials,
to stop the sale and manufacture of counterfeit and imitation goods. The Companys goal is to protect its brands, products and
customers. All legitimate RUSK MiraCurl stylers are protected by granted and/or pending patents as well as registered trademarks.
Please be sure to purchase the RUSK MiraCurl styler from a trusted retailer or distributor to ensure product performance andsatisfaction as well as your safe use.
*PATENTS include Australian Patents 348730 and 351553 and New Zealand Patent 417455. Additional Australia patent rights are pending. Babyliss, BabylissPro, MiraCurl and
RUSK are trademarks of Conair Corporation. 2014 Conair Corporation. All rights reserved.
If you have seen counterfeit goods or have encountered a counterfeit or product of inferior quality that looks suspicious, please
contact us on:
[email protected] Call 1800 126 806 (Australia) or Call 0800 003 618 (New Zealand).
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 4 PageID 19
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
20/103
HOW TO SPOT A COUNTERFEIT
1. Colour- The professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is only available in the following colours: Black Metallic charcoal finish with purple highlights Pinklimited stock, only sold through Hairhouse Warehouse Bluelimited stock, only sold through Price Attack
2. PlugThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler sold in Australia and New Zealand s has an Australian SAA plug. Any stylersold in Australia or New Zealand containing a non-Australian SAA plug with a separate adaptor is not a genuine product. Any
product advertised as dual voltage, is not genuine.
3. PackagingDamaged, faded or missing packaging are often signs of counterfeit goods. Also, look for misspelled words, oddmarkings, missing manuals and/or warranty documentation.
4. DistributorThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is sold only through reputable RUSK approved wholesalers and salonslisted on our website atwww.rusk.com.au.
5. WebsitesBeware of websites containing domain names using our trademark name, MiraCurl, in combination with wordssuch as cheap, discount, outlet, bargain, buy, 4sale, sold, shop, a country name and any other extraneous wording. These are
all illegal sites that intend to deceive consumers. The official website for the professional RUSK MiraCurl styler iswww.rusk.com.auorwww.rusk.co.nz.
Also beware of eBay stores selling different brands and versions of the MiraCurl.
6. Price If the price looks too good to be true, then it probably is. In Australia, the RUSK MiraCurl is around $199. In NewZealand, the RUSK MiraCurl is around $275.
7. ShippingThe professional RUSK MiraCurl styler is only shipped from within Australia, nowhere else. Items shipped fromAsia, the US and some locations within Australia may also be fake or counterfeit
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 4 PageID 20
http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.co.nz/http://www.rusk.com.au/http://www.rusk.com.au/ -
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
21/103
WHAT TO DO IF YOUVEBOUGHT A COUNTERFEIT OR IMITATION
1. Contact the seller for a complete refund2. Call your credit card company and requesta chargeback to the seller3. Report your purchase to RUSK/Conair Professional.
WHAT WE ARE DOING
Conair and its subsidiaries and affiliates worldwide are actively working with local, federal and international law enforcement, as
well as Australian and foreign customs officials, to stop the sale of counterfeit and imitation goods. We have already removed
hundreds of illegal websites and listings of counterfeit goods from online auction and marketplace sites such as Amazon, eBay,
AliBaba and TaoBao, to name a few. We actively conduct investigations, raids and seizures globally to remove dangerous
counterfeit goods from the market. We want you to be safe and buy only authentic goods. We guarantee the performance of our
professional RUSK MiraCurl styler and are proud to partner with distributors that support our efforts to ensure the legitimacy,
quality and safety of our goods.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-4 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 4 PageID 21
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
22/103
!"#$%$& !
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 37 PageID 22
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
23/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 1 of 27
United States Patent 8,651,118 BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Claim 1
A hair styling device having:
a body defining a chamber adapted toaccommodate a length of hair, the
chamber having a primary openingthrough which the length of hair may
pass into the chamber;
The area between the
outer wall of the
central cylinder andthe inner wall of theouter housing
constitutes thechamber, with hair
passing into thechamber through the
opening shown.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 37 PageID 23
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
24/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 2 of 27
a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the
primary opening;The crescent-shaped
rotating element(bracketed in bottom
picture) rotates adjacentto the primary opening
where hair is drawn in.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 37 PageID 24
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
25/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 3 of 27
an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the
rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;
The crescent-shaped
rotating element
(bracketed in bottompicture) wraps the hairaround the center
cylindrical piece. The endof the cylindrical piece
(bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4 of 37 PageID 25
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
26/103
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
27/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 5 of 27
Claim 2
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the secondary opening
is annular and surrounds the free end ofthe elongate member.
Claim 4
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the secondary opening
is permanently connected to theprimary opening.
The secondary opening is in
a ring shape and is at theend of the central cylinder.
The primary opening (top
arrow) and secondaryopening (bottom arrow) are
both integral with theoverall device.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 6 of 37 PageID 27
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
28/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 6 of 27
Claim 5
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment
is located within one of (i) thesecondary opening and (ii) the primary
opening, and wherein the secondaryopening is connected to the primary
opening by way of a passageway.
The top portion is located within
the primary opening when closed.
The primary opening (top arrow) isconnected to the secondary opening
(bottom arrow) through the central
chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 37 PageID 28
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
29/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 7 of 27
Claim 7
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment
is spring-biased to its open position.
Claim 8
A hair styling device according to
claim 1, having a first handle part and asecond handle part, wherein the
movable abutment is driven to itsclosed position as the second handle
part is moved towards the first handlepart.
The top portion ofthe device closes
down as thesecond handle (top
arrow) is movedtoward the first
handle (lowerarrow).
The device contains a
spring that forces it into an
open position.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 37 PageID 29
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
30/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 8 of 27
Claim 9
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, having a first handle part and a
second handle part, wherein themovable abutment moves from its
closed position to its open position asthe second handle part is moved away
from the first handle part.
Claim 10
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment
in its open position does not obstructany part of the secondary opening.
The device opensup as the second
handle (toparrow) is moved
away from thefirst handle
(lower arrow).
When the device is inthe open position, the
top portion (top arrow)does not obstruct the
secondary opening
(bottom arrow).
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 37 PageID 30
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
31/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 9 of 27
Claim 11
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment
is maintained in its closed positionwhile the rotatable element is rotating.
The crescent-shaped rotating element
(bracketed) is in motion while the deviceis in the closed position (bottom picture).
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 37 PageID 31
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
32/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 10 of 27
Claim 12
A hair styling device according toclaim 1, wherein the movable abutment
is located within the primary opening.
The top portion of the device is locatedwithin the primary opening, where hair
passes through.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 37 PageID 32
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
33/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 11 of 27
Claim 13
A hair styling device having:
a body defining a chamber adapted to
accommodate a length of hair, thechamber having a primary opening
through which the length of hair maypass into the chamber;
The area between the outerwall of the central cylinder
and the inner wall of theouter housing constitutes the
chamber, with hair passing
into the chamber throughthe opening shown.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 12 of 37 PageID 33
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
34/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 12 of 27
a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the
primary opening;The crescent-shaped
element (bracketed,bottom picture) rotates
adjacent to the primaryopening where hair is
drawn in.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 13 of 37 PageID 34
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
35/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 13 of 27
an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the
rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;
The crescent-shaped
rotating element
(bracketed, bottompicture) wraps the hairaround the center
cylindrical piece. The endof the central cylinder
(bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 14 of 37 PageID 35
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
36/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 14 of 27
the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of
hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located
adjacent to the free end; and
The secondary opening is at
the free end of the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 15 of 37 PageID 36
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
37/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 15 of 27
a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable
abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass
through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of
hair is retained within the chamber,wherein the movable abutment is
spring-biased to its open position.
When in the open position
(top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary
opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is
retained within the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 16 of 37 PageID 37
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
38/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 16 of 27
The device contains a spring
that forces it into an openposition.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 17 of 37 PageID 38
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
39/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 17 of 27
Claim 14
A hair styling device having:
a body defining a chamber adapted to
accommodate a length of hair, thechamber having a primary opening
through which the length of hair maypass into the chamber;
The area between theouter wall of the
central cylinder andthe inner wall of the
outer housingconstitutes the
chamber, with hairpassing into the
chamber through theopening shown.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 18 of 37 PageID 39
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
40/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 18 of 27
a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the
primary opening;The crescent-shaped
element (bracketed,bottom picture) rotates
adjacent to the primaryopening where hair is
drawn in.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 19 of 37 PageID 40
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
41/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 19 of 27
an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the
rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;
The crescent-shaped
rotating element(bracketed, bottom
picture) wraps the hair
around the centercylindrical piece. The endof the central cylinder
(bottom arrow) constitutesthe free end.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 20 of 37 PageID 41
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
42/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 20 of 27
the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of
hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located
adjacent to the free end;
The secondary opening is at
the free end of the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 21 of 37 PageID 42
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
43/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 21 of 27
a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable
abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass
through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of
hair is retained within the chamber; and
When in the open position
(top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary
opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is
retained within the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 22 of 37 PageID 43
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
44/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 22 of 27
a first handle part and a second handlepart, wherein the movable abutment is
driven to its closed position as thesecond handle part is moved towards
the first handle part.
Claim 15
A hair styling device having:
a body defining a chamber adapted toaccommodate a length of hair, the
chamber having a primary openingthrough which the length of hair may
pass into the chamber;
The top portion ofthe device closes
down as thesecond handle (top
arrow) is movedtoward the first
handle (lower
arrow).
The area between theouter wall of thecentral cylinder and
the inner wall of the
outer housingconstitutes thechamber, with hair
passing into thechamber through the
opening shown.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 23 of 37 PageID 44
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
45/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 23 of 27
a rotatable element adapted to engagethe length of hair adjacent to the
primary opening;The crescent-shaped
rotating element(bracketed, bottom
picture) rotates adjacentto the primary opening
where hair is drawn in.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 24 of 37 PageID 45
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
46/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 24 of 27
an elongate member around which, inuse, the length of hair is wound by the
rotatable element, the elongate memberhaving a free end;
The crescent-shapedrotating element
(bracketed, bottompicture) wraps the hair
around the centercylindrical piece. The end
of the central cylinder(bottom arrow) constitutes
the free end.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 25 of 37 PageID 46
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
47/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 25 of 27
the chamber having a secondaryopening through which the length of
hair may pass out of the chamber, thesecondary opening being located
adjacent to the free end;
The secondary opening is at
the free end of the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 26 of 37 PageID 47
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
48/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 26 of 27
a movable abutment which can engagethe length of hair in use, the movable
abutment having an open position inwhich the length of hair can pass
through the secondary opening, and aclosed position in which the length of
hair is retained within the chamber; and
When in the open position
(top picture), hair can flowthrough the secondary
opening. When closed(bottom picture), hair is
retained within the chamber.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 27 of 37 PageID 48
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
49/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 27 of 27
a first handle part and a second handlepart, wherein the movable abutment
moves from its closed position to itsopen position as the second handle part
is moved away from the first handlepart.
The device opens
up as the secondhandle (top
arrow) is movedaway from the
first handle(lower arrow).
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 28 of 37 PageID 49
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
50/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 1 of 9
United States Patent 8,607,804 BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Claim 1
A hair styling aid comprising:
a generally cylindrical elongate memberfor receiving a length of hair to be
styled,
guide structure for receiving the length
of hair and for guiding the length of hairtowards the elongate member,
The cylinder in the centerof the device comprises
the elongate member.
The V-shaped guide
structure (emphasized inyellow) guides hair into
the device and toward thecenter cylinder.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 29 of 37 PageID 50
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
51/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 2 of 9
a rotatable element rotatable relative tothe guide structure, the rotatable element
having a part adapted to engage thelength of hair for winding the length of
hair around the elongate member,
The crescent-shaped portion of thedevice displayed within the
brackets (bottom picture) rotatesrelative to the guide structure (top
picture, emphasized in yellow). Thehair is wound around the central
cylinder.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 30 of 37 PageID 51
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
52/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 3 of 9
a housing surrounding a part of theelongate member, the housing having at
least one wall, the at least one wallcomprising a generally cylindrical inner
surface,
an elongate opening in the at least one
wall parallel with the elongate member,
The opening in the wallof the housing runs
parallel with the centralcylinder.
The housing (displayed within
the brackets) has an innercylindrical wall.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 31 of 37 PageID 52
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
53/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 4 of 9
a chamber bordered by the generallycylindrical inner surface and the
generally cylindrical elongate memberfor containing the length of hair,
the rotatable element being rotatablerelative to the generally cylindrical inner
surface,
The chamber constitutes
the space between thecylinder wall and the
cylindrical inner wall ofthe housing.
The rotating element
of the housing rotatesaround the inner
cylindrical wall of thehousing.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 32 of 37 PageID 53
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
54/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 5 of 9
the part adapted to engage the length ofhair passing around the generally
cylindrical elongate member whenwinding the length of hair around the
elongate member,The crescent-shapedrotating part (bracketed
portion of bottom picture)can engage the hair and
wind around the centerstationary piece.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 33 of 37 PageID 54
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
55/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 6 of 9
the length of hair not being clamped inthe chamber during styling thereof,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Nx0-DJRJC0
the guide structure being adjacent the
elongate opening and comprisingopposedly facing converging surfaces
adapted to the length of hair through theelongate opening, towards the elongate
member, and
Hair is drawn in bythe curling iron and
rotated around thecylinder, and is not
clamped down at anystage.
The guide structure(emphasized in
yellow) is V-shapedand is adjacent to the
opening throughwhich hair is drawn
in.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 34 of 37 PageID 55
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
56/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 7 of 9
the housing wall(s) being heated in use.
Claim 4
A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the housing comprises the guide
structure.
The red and white
wires are connectedto the displayed
heating elements.
The guide structured
(emphasized in yellow)is part of the overall
housing of the device.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 35 of 37 PageID 56
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
57/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 8 of 9
Claim 5
A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the housing is integral with a
handle.
The device handle and
housing constitute one
piece.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 36 of 37 PageID 57
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
58/103
U.S. Patent No. 8,607,804 vs. BARBAR 2008 Auto Curling Iron
Page 9 of 9
Claim 6
A hair styling aid according to claim 1,wherein the rotatable element rotates
relative to the generally cylindricalelongate member.
The crescent-shapedrotating portion of the
device (bottom picture,
bracketed) rotates aroundthe central cylinder.
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-5 Filed 05/30/14 Page 37 of 37 PageID 58
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
59/103
!"#$%$& (
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 3 PageID 59
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
60/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 3 PageID 60
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
61/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-6 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 3 PageID 61
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
62/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 20 PageID 62
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
63/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
64/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 3 of 20 PageID 64
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
65/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
66/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 5 of 20 PageID 66
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
67/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
68/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 7 of 20 PageID 68
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
69/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 20 PageID 69
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
70/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
71/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 20 PageID 71
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
72/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
73/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
74/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
75/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 14 of 20 PageID 75
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
76/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 15 of 20 PageID 76
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
77/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 16 of 20 PageID 77
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
78/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 17 of 20 PageID 78
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
79/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 18 of 20 PageID 79
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
80/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 19 of 20 PageID 80
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
81/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-7 Filed 05/30/14 Page 20 of 20 PageID 81
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
82/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID 82
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
83/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 2 of 13 PageID 83
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
84/103
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
85/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 4
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
86/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
87/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
88/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
89/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 8 of 13 PageID 89
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
90/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 9 of 13 PageID 90
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
91/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 10 of 13 PageID 91
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
92/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 11 of 13 PageID 92
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
93/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 12 of 13 PageID 93
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
94/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-8 Filed 05/30/14 Page 13 of 13 PageID 94
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
95/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID 95
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
96/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
97/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
98/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
99/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
100/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
101/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-9 Filed 05/30/14 Page
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
102/103
-
8/12/2019 Conair v. Barbar - Complaint
103/103
Case 6:14-cv-00831-GAP-TBS Document 1-11 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 1 PageID 103