comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

43
1 st Quarter 2012 State of the Internet

description

Raport privind situația internetului în SUA, Q1 2012

Transcript of comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

Page 1: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

1st Quarter 2012

State of the Internet

Page 2: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

2 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 3: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

3 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

In 1996, 2/3 of the world’s Internet population was in the US, yet today Asia Pacific is the largest

region with over 41% of the population.

Many emerging regions are likely to bypass old modes, skipping dial-up to go straight to broadband,

making multimedia, video, and collaborative content immediately accessible.

Early adoption of mobile web in addition to PC web will likely be popular in many of these high-

growth areas.

14.6%

8.9%

8.8%

41.0%

26.6%

Middle East

- Africa

Europe

North

America

Asia Pacific

Latin

America

Distribution of Worldwide Internet Audience

66%

13%

34%

87%

1996 2012

US Internet Population vs. Rest of the World

Rest of the

World

US

The US Is No Longer the Center of the Online Universe

Source: comScore World Metrix, March 2012

Page 4: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

4 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Internet Users Age 15+ (MM)

9% Worldwide Growth Fueled by Country Growth

333.3

190.7

73.5

56.3

56.0

51.5

45.5

43.2

37.6

31.0

28.6

24.0

23.6

22.8

21.6

China

United States

Japan

India

Russian Federation

Germany

Brazil

France

United Kingdom

South Korea

Italy

Canada

Turkey

Mexico

Spain

While US user growth was just 5.3%

over the past year, India, Italy,

Mexico, and the Russian Federation

have experienced impressive growth

rates of 32%, 24%, 22%, and 18%

respectively.

Source: comScore World Metrix, March 2012

Page 5: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

5 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Average Hours Per Visitor Per Month

44.3

38.8

35.1

33.8

33.0

31.8

30.4

30.2

28.7

28.6

28.4

28.2

28.1

26.5

26.5

Canada

United States

United Kingdom

Netherlands

Turkey

Israel

Thailand

Poland

Vietnam

Norway

Brazil

Russian Federation

Finland

Argentina

Hong Kong

Online Engagement by Country

Canada is consistently the

most engaged country. The

average visitor spent more

than 44 hours online in March

2012.

Source: comScore World Metrix, March 2012

Page 6: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

6 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

More Worldwide Unique Visitors Are Spending More Minutes on

Social Networking Sites than Email Sites

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

Mar-2011 May-2011 Jul-2011 Sep-2011 Nov-2011 Jan-2012 Mar-2012Un

iqu

e V

isit

ors

(00

0)

Global Total Unique Visitors (000)

Email Social Networking

+17%

+13%

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

Mar-2011 May-2011 Jul-2011 Sep-2011 Nov-2011 Jan-2012 Mar-2012

Min

ute

s (

MM

)

Global Total Minutes (MM)

Email Social Networking

+37%

+3%

Source: comScore World Metrix, March 2012

Page 7: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

7 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 8: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

8 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Is the US Internet Really Still Growing?

Total US Internet Users

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

200,000

250,000

Total Unique Visitors (000) Average Daily Visitors (000)

+6%

+5% Yes, the US

Internet is still

growing, albeit not

as quickly as it

had been.

The Average

Minutes per Visitor

grew 9% over the

past year.

The average

internet user made

4 more visits to

the internet in

March 2012 than in

March 2011.

Total US Internet Engagement

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Average Minutes per Visitor Average Visits per Visitor

+7%

+9%

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Panel Only Data, March 2012

Page 9: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

9 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

What Online Categories are Driving Web Usage?

The 31+ hours the average user spends online is divided among several key content

categories such as Social Media, Entertainment, and Portals.

Top Categories Reach Top Categories Engagement

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Panel Only Data, March 2012

0

100

200

300

400

Ave

rag

e M

inu

tes

/UV

-7% +16%

+24%

+10% +11% +2%

85%

90%

95%

100%

Re

ac

h

+1% +3% -3%

-1%

Y/Y %

change Y/Y % change

-1%

0%

Page 10: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

10 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Which Categories are Driving Web Growth?

As expected in

an election year,

Political sites

saw terrific

growth year

over year at

132%.

The

Gay/Lesbian

category

continued to

see impressive

growth, growing

93% between

March 2011 and

March 2012.

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Panel Only Data March 2012

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

90,000

100,000

UV

s (

000)

March 2011 UV's March 2012 UV's

+132%

+93%

+54%

+52%

+47%

+46%

+29%

+30%

+28%

Page 11: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

11 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Unique Visitors to social networking sites have increased 6% year

over year

-10,000

5,000

20,000

35,000

50,000

65,000

80,000

95,000

110,000

125,000

140,000

155,000

170,000

Facebook Twitter Tumblr LinkedIn Pinterest

UV

s (

00

0)

+4%

+58%

+168%

+67%

Since reporting began in May 2011, the idea sharing website Pinterest

has seen exponential growth in Unique Visitors.

+4377%

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Panel Only Data, March 2012

Page 12: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

12 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Pinterest is the fastest growing social media site in both Unique

Visitors and Clicks on search engines

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

Searc

h E

ng

ine C

licks (

000)

Un

iqu

e V

isit

ors

(000)

Unique Visitors (000) Search Engine Clicks (000)

Pinterest is a content sharing

website in which users “pin”

images and videos to share in

an online community. Since

reporting began in May, it is

the fastest growing social

media site of the past year.

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Data

Page 13: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

13 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Pinterest buyers spend more, buy more items, and conduct more

transactions than other social media buyers

4.20

4.40

4.60

4.80

5.00

5.20

5.40

5.60

2.70 2.80 2.90 3.00 3.10

Item

s p

er

Bu

ye

r

Transactions per Buyer

Bubble size = Dollars per Buyer

Facebook

Pinterest

Twitter

LinkedIn

Tumblr

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

LinkedIn Pinterest Twitter Facebook Tumblr

Buying Power Index

Pinterest users are second only to

LinkedIn users in the Buying Power

Index of the top 5 social media sites.

However, Pinterest buyers spend more

money, more often, and on more items

than any of the other top 5 social

media sites.

Source: comScore US Media Metrix Data

Page 14: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

14 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 15: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

15 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

The average internet user viewed 243 videos with a viewing time

of 21 hours, 22 minutes

Reach of elusive audiences

Better engagement

However, monetization is still a big

challenge:

User experience

Rights for UGC (User

Generated Content)

Value Drivers of Online Video

Advertising

Source: comScore Video Metrix, March 2012

March 2012

US Video Viewers 187MM

% Of Internet Users Who Viewed

At Least One Video 83%

Total # of Viewed Videos 45.4B

YoY Growth in Video Views 33%

Videos per Viewer 243

Viewing Time per Viewer 21 hr 22 min

Page 16: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

16 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Males Are More Engaged Online Video Viewers than Females

Source: comScore Video Metrix, March 2012

Video Activity By Gender

+120% +66%

+116%

93 172

755

94

313

1,807

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

1400

1500

1600

1700

1800

1900

UVs (MM) Videos per Viewer Minutes per Viewer

Females Males

+82% +139%

Page 17: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

17 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Duration Jumps as Long-Form Content Floods the Web

Total US Streaming Minutes and Video Views

Sites heavy with

long-form content

have continued to

grow over the

past year,

contributing to

the increase in

time spent

streaming.

March 2011 March 2012

Hours per Viewer 14.7 21.4

Videos per Viewer 192.1 242.6

Minutes per Video 4.6 5.3

Source: comScore Video Metrix, March 2012

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Mar '11 Apr '11 May '11 June'11

July '11 August'11

Sept '11 Oct '11 Nov ' 11 Dec '11 Jan '12 Feb '12 Mar '12

Billio

ns

Total US Duration and Video Views

Total Minutes Total Videos+53%

+47%

Page 18: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

18 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 19: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

19 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Global Search Market Growth of 22% Y/Y–More Than 4.1 Million

Searches per Minute

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

UnitedStates

China Japan UnitedKingdom

Germany Brazil RussianFederation

France Turkey India

Top 10 Countries by Number of Searches (MM) Conducted*

Apr-2011

Apr-2012

+56%

+45%

+54% +35% +4% +39% +23% 11%

+21%

+8%

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

120,000

140,000

Top 10 Search Properties by Searches (MM) Conducted

Apr-2011

Apr-2012

+53% +6%

11%

-40% -7% +97% +38% +44% -16%

+21%

*Searches based on “expanded search” definition, which includes searches at the top properties where search activity is observed, not only

the core search engines.

Google sites

account for

over two-

thirds of the

177 billion

searches

conducted

worldwide in

April.

Chinese

based Baidu

(13.8 billion

searches) was

second in

front of

Yahoo! (9.9

billion

searches).

Source: comScore qSearch 2.0, April 2012

Page 20: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

20 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

27.7 billion searches were performed in April 2012, which marked an

8% growth rate over April 2011.

qSearch 2.0: Trends in the U.S. Search Market

Source: comScore qSearch 2.0, April 2012

Total U.S. Searches for all qSearch properties (Billions)

25.6

27.2 26.6

27.4 27.3 27.1

28.3 28.3

29.5

28.5 28.0

29.5

27.7

Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12

Change vs.

April-11

+8%

Page 21: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

21 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

qSearch 2.0: Trends in the U.S. Search Market

Increases in search intensity by Heavy Searchers and Medium Searchers helped drive search

growth.

Source: comScore qSearch 2.0, April 2012

Searches per Searcher

Heavy Searchers (Upper 20%) Moderate Searchers (Middle 30%) Light Searchers (Bottom 50%)

Search Intensity Segment Contribution to

Total Searches

63.8%

27.2%

9.0%

Percentage of Searches

22.5 21.9

108.6 110.5

370.9 389.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12

Change vs.

April-11

+5%

+2%

-3%

Page 22: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

22 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential. Source: comScore qSearch 2.0, April 2012

Leading Search Properties: Searches per Searcher

Google Sites 0%

Yahoo! Sites +2%

Microsoft Sites +19%

AOL, Inc. +9%

Ask Network -2%

Microsoft, Yahoo!, and AOL show intensity growth versus a year ago.

qSearch 2.0: Leading U.S. Search Properties

83.4

27.8 30.4

9.3 7.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12

Change vs.

April-11

Page 23: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

23 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 24: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

24 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Mobile On Track to Eclipse the Desktop

Source: Morgan Stanley Research

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Desktop

Mobile

Number of Global Users (Millions)

Page 25: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

25 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Smartphone 45.6%

Not Smartphone

54.4%

U.S. Smartphone Penetration

How the U.S. Mobile Market Has Changed – Highlights of Q1 2012

The number of Smartphone owners grew by 47% year-over-year in March 2012

In March 2012 there were 106.7 million Smartphone owners.

Product: MobiLens

Data: Three month average ending March 2012

Country: US, N= 30,963

106.7 million

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

100,000

# P

ho

ne O

wn

ers

(000)

Growth of U.S. Smartphone Installed Base

+47% Year on Year Growth

Page 26: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

26 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Product: MobiLens

Data: Three month average ending March 2012

Country: US, N= 30,963

Continuous Decline of Feature Phones as Newly Acquired Devices

In March 2012 62.9% of new phone acquisitions were Smartphones.

Google and Apple accounted for the majority of new device acquisitions in Q1

Google had a share of 58%, while iPhones made up just over 26% of new Smartphones.

47.5% 48.0% 52.5% 59.5% 62.9%

52.5% 52.0% 47.5% 40.5% 37.1%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012

% A

cq

uir

ed

Devic

e i

n M

on

th

New Devices Acquired by Type

Smartphone Not Smartphone

Google 58.3% Apple

26.3%

RIM 9.5%

Microsoft 4.6%

Other OS 1.3%

New Smartphones Acquired by OS

Page 27: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

27 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Android And Apple Devices Dominate U.S. Smartphone Market

Google’s Android platform share

grew rapidly over the past year,

increasing its market share to

51.0%.

Apple’s share increased from

25.0% to over 30%. Android and

Apple combined now account for

over 80% of the Smartphone

market.

RIM has taken 3rd position in the

Smartphone market. In March 2012,

RIM handsets accounted for only

12.3% of all Smartphones

Microsoft based devices also lost

market share and represented 3.9%

in March 2012.

Product: MobiLens

Data: Three month average ending March 2012

Country: US, N= 30,963

5.1% 2.1%

7.5%

3.9%

27.1%

12.3%

25.5%

30.7%

34.8%

51.0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

March 2011 March 2012

% S

mart

ph

on

e I

nsta

lled

Base

Smartphone Operating System Share

Google

Apple

RIM

Microsoft

Other OS

Page 28: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

28 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

15.0% of all U.S. Smartphone Owners Accessed Digital Books or

Magazines on their phones in March 2012

Product: MobiLens

Data: Three month average ending March 2012

Country: US, N= 30,963

16.8% of these 16 million Smartphone owners accessed digital books or

magazines on their devices ‘almost every day’.

Amazon’s app had the highest reach among all Smartphone owners

using eReader apps.

16.8%

29.2%

54.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

Almost everyday

At least onceeach week

Once to threetimes throughout

the month

Frequency of Accessing Digital Books or Magazines

38%

19% 16%

16%

11%

Reach of apps among Smartphone owners with eReader apps

Amazon.com

Google

Barnes & Noble

iBook

eReader.com

Page 29: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

29 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

8.9%

24.9%

March 2011 March 2012

Percentage of Smartphone Audience Also Owning a Tablet

Multi-Device Ownership: The Rise of the Digital Omnivore

Tablets have led to the rise of the “Digital Omnivore” – consumers who

engage seamlessly with multiple online touch points daily.

24.9% of all U.S. Smartphone owners also owned a tablet, up 308% from the

previous year.

Product: MobiLens

Data: One month snapshot, March 2011 / March 2012

Country: US, N= 9,981

Page 30: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

30 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 31: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

31 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Q2 '08 Q3 '08 Q4 '08 Q1 '09 Q2 '09 Q3 '09 Q4 '09 Q1 '10 Q2 '10 Q3 '10 Q4 '10 Q1 '11 Q2 '11 Q3 '11 Q4 '11 Q1 '12

Overall e-Commerce dollar sales have posted double-digit gains in every

quarter since Q4 2010 and are now well ahead of pre-recession levels

Bil

lio

ns

($

)

e-Commerce Dollar Sales ($ Billions) Source: comScore e-Commerce Measurement

+13% +6% -3% 0% -1% -2% +3% +10% +9% +9% +11% +12% +14% +13% +14% +17%

% Chg vs. YA

$30.6 $30.3

$38.1

$31.0 $30.2 $29.6

$39.0

$33.9 $32.9 $32.1

$43.4

$38.0 $37.5 $36.3

$49.7

$44.3

Compared to pre-recession levels

(Q1 2008), total retail in Q1 2012 is

up 10%...

e-Commerce is up +42%

Page 32: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

32 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Led by Amazon’s +29% growth, many retail sites posted double-digit

gains in unique visitors in Q1 vs. a year ago

Avg. Monthly UVs (MM) on Select Retail Sites in Q1 2012 Source: comScore Media Metrix, U.S.

12.9

12.9

13.4

15.7

19.9

24.7

28.2

39.7

48.3

107.4

Macy's Inc.

Hewlett Packard

Sears.com

Ticketmaster

Best Buy Sites

Target Corporation

Netflix.com

Wal-Mart

Apple.com

Amazon Sites +29%

+25%

+18%

+9%

+8%

+12%

+42%

+23%

-21%

+26%

Y/Y Change

Page 33: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

33 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

About 1 in 10 consumers had aided awareness of the term

‘showrooming’

“Showrooming” – verb. Visiting a brick-and-mortar store to see a

product but instead purchasing the product

online. Shoppers may intend from the start to

purchase the product online, or may decide to

purchase online, rather than in-person, after

viewing the item at the store.

12%

16%

8%

% who have heard of'showrooming'

All respondents

Men

Women

Page 34: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

34 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

35% of respondents have engaged in ‘showrooming’. Most intended to

buy at brick-and-mortar but changed their mind at the store

Consumer Usage of Showrooming

Q. Based on this definition, have you ever done this activity? (showrooming) Source: comScore Survey – April 2012

Who’s engaging in

showrooming?

35% of all respondents

50% of respondents ages 25-34,

the highest of any age group

48% of tablet owners and 43% of

smartphone owners

43% of Millenials*

* - defined as ages 18-29

…and did they plan it?

6 in 10 ‘showroomers’ say they

originally planned to purchase at the

store, but changed their mind while

there & instead bought online

32% said they went to the store always

intending to buy online

Page 35: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

35 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

72%

45%

24%

18%

17%

5%

Price was better online

Planned to buy online but wanted to see item(s)in person before ordering

Item was out of stock at store

Would rather have item(s) shipped to home thantake home with me

Was not convenient to buy in-person at the time

Other

% among those who engaged in 'showrooming'

Price was the biggest driver of ‘showrooming,’ while some wanted to

see item in person before deciding to purchase

Why Consumers Are Engaging in ‘Showrooming’

Q. Which of the following describe why you utilized showrooming? (Please select all that apply) Source: comScore Survey – April 2012

Location, Location, Location Respondents living in urban areas were

nearly twice as likely (26%) to choose

this option than those living in suburban

or rural areas (15% for both)

Page 36: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

36 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Consumer Electronics and Apparel were the most popular categories

among consumers who bought via showrooming

Product Categories Most Likely to be Purchased via Showrooming

Q. Which of the following types of item have you bought online after using ‘showrooming?’

(Please select all that apply) Source: comScore Survey – April 2012

63%

43%

29%

22%

22%

16%

10%

Consumer electronics

Apparel, clothing & accessories

Books

Appliances

Toys

Jewelry / watches

Other

% among those who engaged in 'showrooming'

Page 37: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

37 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Agenda

Worldwide Context

US Vital Signs

State of the Internet

– Video

– Search

– Mobile

– eCommerce

Monetization

Page 38: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

38 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

US Online Ad Spend Poised to Grow 18% in 2012

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

$25

$30

$35

$40

$45

$50

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

US Online Ad Spending 2010-2015

$ Billions and % Change

8.8% 14.9%

20.2% 17.6%

12.0% 10.4%

Source: eMarketer: US Online AdSpend Poised to Grow 20% in 2011

Page 39: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

39 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Who are the top advertisers in the online market in March 2012?

0

1,000,000

2,000,000

3,000,000

4,000,000

5,000,000

6,000,000

7,000,000

8,000,000

9,000,000

10,000,000

To

tal D

isp

lay A

d I

mp

res

sio

ns

(00

0)

Top 10 Online Advertisers

Source: comScore US Ad Metrix, March 2012

Telecommunications company AT&T has a large online advertising presences.

Top advertisers also include Microsoft and business/finance companies, Experian and Scottrade.

Page 40: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

40 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Campaign In-view ad rates ranged from:

US 55% to 93% EU 64% to 72% CA 56% to 74%

US 69%

AVERAGE

67% AVERAGE

EU 65%

AVERAGE

CA

Are consumers actually seeing the ads?

Source: comScore vCE Charter Studies

Page 41: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

41 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Large sites within a content category do a better job than

smaller sites at ensuring the ads are actually viewable

Percentage of Ads Served In-View within a Given Site Category

The difference in in-view rates between Top 50 sites

versus the long tail sites in their category

was a full 16-percentage points

Source: comScore vCE Charter Studies

Page 42: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

42 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Digital Ad Economics:

The good guys aren’t necessarily winning

Correlation of In-View Rates & CPM

An equally as weak correlation was also observed between

CPM and ability to hit a primary demographic target

Source: comScore vCE Charter Studies

Page 43: comScore: State of US Internet Q1 2012

43 © comScore, Inc. Proprietary and Confidential.

Thank You!