Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

45
Predicting Secondary Structure of All-Helical Proteins Using Hidden Markov Support Vector Machines Blaise Gassend, Charles W. O'Donnell, William Thies, Andrew Lee, Marten van Dijk, and Srinivas Devadas Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics – August 20, 2006

description

Predicting Secondary Structure of All-Helical Proteins Using Hidden Markov Support Vector Machines Blaise Gassend, Charles W. O'Donnell, William Thies, Andrew Lee, Marten van Dijk, and Srinivas Devadas. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Page 1: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Predicting Secondary Structure of All-Helical Proteins Using

Hidden Markov Support Vector Machines

Blaise Gassend, Charles W. O'Donnell, William Thies, Andrew Lee,

Marten van Dijk, and Srinivas Devadas

Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics – August 20, 2006

Page 2: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Protein Structure Prediction• Classical problem: given sequence, predict structure

• High-level approaches1. Energy-minimization (ab-initio) techniques

- Elegant, but often lack correct parameters

2. Homology-based techniques

- Useful, but hard to predict new proteins

Sequence Structure

Our approach:Use energy minimization, butlearn parameters from existing proteins

Page 3: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Our Framework (Training)

Amino-acidSequence

Prediction Algorithm

Correctstructure

Protein Data Bank

EnergyParameters

Predictedstructure

correct incorrect

Done! Constraints

energy(incorrect) > energy(correct)

LearningAlgorithm

Page 4: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Our Framework (Testing)

EnergyParameters

Predictedstructure

Prediction Algorithm

Amino-acidSequence

Page 5: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Initial Focus: Secondary Structure• Classify each residue as alpha helix, beta strand, coil

– In this paper, restrict to all-alpha proteins

• Applications:– Informing tertiary structure predictors– Identification of homologous proteins– Identification of active sites (coils)

Page 6: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

Page 7: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DSCZvelebil et al.

GOR

Chou/Fasman50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

Statistical Methods

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Page 8: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Chou/Fasman

GOR

Zvelebil et al. DSC

SSPro

PSIPredPorter

SSPro4PetersonPSIPred

Riis/KroughPHD

Qian/Sejnoweski

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Page 9: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Chou/Fasman

GOR

Zvelebil et al. DSC

SSPro

PSIPredPorter

SSPro4PetersonPSIPred

Riis/KroughPHD

Qian/Sejnoweski

HuNguyen

KimWard

Ceroni

CasbonHua/Sun

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

SVMs

Page 10: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DSCZvelebil et al.

GOR

Chou/Fasman

Qian/Sejnoweski

PHD Riis/Krough

PSIPredPeterson

PSIPredPorter

SSPro4

SSPro

Schmidler et al.

HMMSTR

Nguyen

Martin

Won

Martin

Hua/SunCasbon

CeroniWard

Kim

NguyenHu

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

SVMs

Page 11: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DSCZvelebil et al.

GOR

Chou/Fasman

Qian/Sejnoweski

PHD Riis/Krough

PSIPredPeterson

PSIPredPorter

SSPro4

SSPro

Schmidler et al.

HMMSTR

Nguyen

Martin

Won

Martin

Hua/SunCasbon

CeroniWard

Kim

NguyenHu

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

• Exploits biochemical models• Offers biological insight

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

SVMs1400-2900 parameters

680 MB of support vectors

471 parameters

Page 12: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DSCZvelebil et al.

GOR

Chou/Fasman

Qian/Sejnoweski

PHD Riis/Krough

PSIPredPeterson

PSIPredPorter

SSPro4

SSPro

Schmidler et al.

HMMSTR

Nguyen

Martin

THISPAPER

Won

Martin

Hua/SunCasbon

CeroniWard

Kim

NguyenHu

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Year

Pre

dic

tio

n A

cc

ura

cy

(Q

3)

Secondary Structure Predictors

302 paramsStatistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

Statistical Methods

Neural Networks

HMMs

SequenceOnly

Sequence +Alignment

SVMs1400-2900 parameters

471 parameters• Exploits biochemical models• Offers biological insight

680 MB of support vectors

Page 13: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Our Framework Applied to Helix Prediction

Amino-acidSequence

Correctstructure

Protein Data Bank

EnergyParameters

Predictedstructure

correct incorrect

Done! Constraints

energy(incorrect) > energy(correct)

LearningAlgorithm

Prediction Algorithm

HiddenMarkov Model

SupportVector

Machines

Alpha Helices

MNIFEMLRIDEGL HHHHHHHHH

Page 14: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2302 Total

Page 15: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2

• Example:Sequence: MNIFELRIDEGL

Structure: HHHHHH

Energy =

302 Total

Page 16: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2

• Example:Sequence: MNIFELRIDEGL

Structure: HHHHHH

Energy = HF + HE + HL + HR + HI + HD (Helix)

302 Total

Page 17: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2

• Example:Sequence: MNIFELRIDEGL

Structure: HHHHHH

Energy = HF + HE + HL + HR + HI + HD (Helix)

+ NM,-3 + NN,-2 + NI,-1 + NF,0 + NE,1 + NL,2 + NR,3 (N-cap)

302 Total

Page 18: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2

• Example:Sequence: MNIFELRIDEGL

Structure: HHHHHH

Energy = HF + HE + HL + HR + HI + HD (Helix)

+ NM,-3 + NN,-2 + NI,-1 + NF,0 + NE,1 + NL,2 + NR,3 (N-cap)

+ CL,-3 + CR,-2 + CI,-1 + CD,0 + CE,1 + CG,2 + CL,3 (C-cap)

302 Total

Page 19: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Energy Parameters

Description of Energy ParametersNumber of Parameters

Name

Energy of residue R in a helix 20 HR

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from N-cap 140 NR,i

Energy of residue R at offset i (-3…3) from C-cap 140 CR,i

Penalty for coils of length 1 or 2 2

• Example:Sequence: MNIFELRIDEGL

Structure: HHHHHH

Energy = HF + HE + HL + HR + HI + HD (Helix)

+ NM,-3 + NN,-2 + NI,-1 + NF,0 + NE,1 + NL,2 + NR,3 (N-cap)

+ CL,-3 + CR,-2 + CI,-1 + CD,0 + CE,1 + CG,2 + CL,3 (C-cap)

302 Total

Page 20: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structureCorrect structure

Energy ( ) = HA*A + HG*G

= w ¢ [A G]

Highest energy in direction of energy parameters w

Feature Space

where w represents the energy parameters [HA HG]

Page 21: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Feature Space

w

Legal structureCorrect structure

Energy ( ) = HA*A + HG*G

= w ¢ [A G]

Highest energy in direction of energy parameters w

where w represents the energy parameters [HA HG]

Page 22: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture

Page 23: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

1. Predict stucture

Page 24: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

Separating Hyperplane

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters

Page 25: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

Separating Hyperplane

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters

Page 26: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters

Page 27: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure

Page 28: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure

Page 29: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters

Page 30: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters

Page 31: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters

Page 32: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure

Page 33: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure

Page 34: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters

Page 35: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters

Page 36: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters

Page 37: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

Structurealready predicted

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters7. Predict structure

Page 38: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

Structurealready predicted

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters7. Predict structure8. Terminate

Page 39: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning the Parameters

A: # of Alanines in Helices

G:

# o

f G

lyci

nes

in H

elic

es

Legal structure

Feature Space

Correct structurePredicted structure

w

Structurealready predicted

1. Predict stucture2. Refine parameters3. Predict structure4. Refine parameters5. Predict structure6. Refine parameters7. Predict structure8. Terminate

Details in paper: - How to converge faster - Early termination condition - [Tsochantaridis et al., ICML’02]

Page 40: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Experimental Methodology• Data set: 300 non-homologous all-alpha proteins

– From EVA’s sequence-unique subset of the PDB, July 2005– Only consider alpha helices (“H” symbol in DSSP)

• Randomly split into 150 training, 150 test proteins

Page 41: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Results

• Comparison to others– Best HMM method to date that does not utilize alignment info

• Offers 3.5% (Q), 0.2% (SOV) over previous best

– Lags behind neural networks; e.g., Porter overall SOV = 76.6%– However, we could likely gain 6-8% from alignment profiles

• Caveats– Moving beyond all-alpha proteins, we could suffer 3%– By considering 3/10 helices, we could decrease 2%

Metric Value Explanation

Q 77.6% percent of residues correctly predicted

SOV 73.4% segment overlap measure [Zemla’99]

[Nguyen02]

[Rost93]

[Jones99]

Page 42: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Conclusions• Represents first step toward learning biophysical

parameters for energy minimization techniques– Iterative, demand-driven learning process using SVMs

• Promising results on alpha-helix prediction

– 77.6% among best Q for methods without alignment info

• Future work: super-secondary structure– Will predict full “contact maps” rather than 3-state labels– For beta sheets, replace HMMs by multi-tape grammars

http://protein.csail.mit.edu/

Page 43: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Extra Slides

Page 44: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Prediction Algorithm• Parameters represent energetic benefit

of a given feature in a protein structure– Features are fixed, chosen by designer– Example features:

• Number of prolines in an alpha helix• Number of coils shorter than 2 residues

• Energy (structure) = features 2 structure Energy (feature)

• Minimal-energy structure found with dynamic prog.– Idea: consider all structures, exploiting overlapping problems– Implemented as HMM using Viterbi algorithm

Amino-acidSequence

EnergyParameters

Predictedstructure

Prediction Algorithm

Structure withMinimal Energy

Page 45: Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Learning Algorithm• Constraints have form:

For all incorrectly predicted structures Si,

in future selection of the parameters w:

Energyw (Si) > Energyw (correct structure)

Constraints are linear in the energy parameters.

• If feasible, could solve with linear programming

• In general, solve with Support Vector Machines (SVMs)

– Energy(Si) ¸ Energy (correct structure) + 1 - i (i ¸ 0)

– Find parameters w minimizing ½ ||w||2 + C/n i=1 i

EnergyParameters

Constraintsenergy(incorrect) > energy(correct)

LearningAlgorithm

n

Provides general solution using soft-margin criterion