Computer-Chemie-CentrumUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg Local properties on molecular surfaces Tim...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Computer-Chemie-CentrumUniversität Erlangen-Nürnberg Local properties on molecular surfaces Tim...
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local properties on molecular surfacesLocal properties on molecular surfaces
Tim Clark
Computer-Chemie-Centrum
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
Erlangen-Nürnberg
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
N
N
N
NHCl
Descriptions of MoleculesDescriptions of Molecules
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Intermolecular InteractionsIntermolecular Interactions• Physical components are well known
• Coulomb• Donor/acceptor• Dispersion (and repulsion)
• We are accustomed to atom-atom approaches• Force fields• QSAR and QSPR
• Are there alternatives?
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
QM-Based DescriptorsQM-Based Descriptors• “Electronic“
• Molecular Electrostatic Potential (MEP)• Polarizability• Donor/Acceptor Properties• Multipole Moments• Molecular surface
• Local properties at a surface• Isodensity (DFT, Murray and Politzer)• SES (fast)
• Statistics of the local property as descriptors• MEP (Murray and Politzer)
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Surface DescriptorsSurface Descriptors• MEP at the surface has a physical basis.• We should be able to describe intermolecular interactions using only surface properties.• Scaffold-Hopping is more likely if we use only surface-based descriptors.• Surface integral-models provide an interesting alternative to statistical QSPR• Atom-based simulation methods scale badly (because they treat atoms)
...... BUT...... BUT• Surface-based descriptors are expensive to calculate• ... and difficult to interpret.
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
How Many Descriptors do we How Many Descriptors do we need for Physical Properties? need for Physical Properties?
(and what are they?)(and what are they?)
• Choose 26 descriptors that appear again and again in our QSPR-models
• Calculate them for the entire Maybridge database
• Calculate the principal components (factors)• What is the dimensionality of physical
property space, what are the descriptors?
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
PC-Eigenvalues: Scree PlotPC-Eigenvalues: Scree Plot
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24Principal Component Number
0
2
4
6
Eig
enva
lue
s
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Prinvipal ComponentsPrinvipal Components
PC # Main descriptors Interpretation
1 Polarizability, molecular weight, volume, surface area, globularity
Size, shape
2 Maximum MEP, mean positive and negative MEPs, total variance
Complementary electrostatic surface descriptors3 Minimum MEP, mean negative MEP,
balance parameter
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Physical property SpacePhysical property Space
PC # Main descriptors Interpretation
4 Total MEP-derived charges on nitrogens, # H-bond donors
Complementary Hydrogen-bonding descriptors5 Total MEP-derived charges on H and
O, minimum MEP, # aromatic rings
6 Dipole moment, dipolar density Dipolar polarity
7-9 Total MEP charges on different types of atom
Chemical diversity
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
What is Missing?What is Missing?
• Purely electrostatic interactions are described well• Donor/Acceptor, Electronegativity and Hardness
are described by the atom-specific descriptors• Sums of potential-derived charges• Counts of H-bond donors and acceptors• Number of aromatic rings• ...... etc.
• Can we design suitable local properties ?
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local Ionization EnergyLocal Ionization Energy
Sjoberg, P.; Murray, J. S.; Brinck, T.; Politzer, P. A., Can. J. Chem. 1990, 68, 1440;
Murray, J. S.; Abu-Awwad, F.; Politzer, P., THEOCHEM 2000, 501-502, 241;
Hussein, W.; Walker, C. G.; Peralta-Inga, Z.; Murray, J. S., Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2001, 82, 160; Politzer, P.; Murray, J. S.; Concha, M. C., Int. J. Quant. Chem. 2002, 88,19.
1,
1,
i ii HOMO
Li
i HOMO
IE
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local Ionization EnergyLocal Ionization Energy
MEP IEL
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local Ionization EnergyLocal Ionization Energy
N
H3C CH3 O O
CH3
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Other Local PropertiesOther Local Properties
,
,
i ii LUMO norbs
Li
i LUMO norbs
EA
•Local Electron affinity:
•Local Hardness: 2
L LL
IP EA
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local Electron AffinityLocal Electron Affinity
N
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local Electron AffinityLocal Electron AffinityFukui Function
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local HardnessLocal Hardness
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
PolarizabiltyPolarizabiltyVariational method (Rinaldi and Rivail 1974)
• Fast (no need for excited states)• Comparable to a population analysis
AA
Amol
jijiN
ij
mol
QN
xxPxxPQ
QN
orbs
2
2
4
||||2
1||
4
pxsf
pxxpf
sxxsf
isp
iipp
iiss
Variational Method (AM1)Variational Method (AM1)
0 10 20 30 40
Experimental Polarizabilty (Angstrom3)
0
10
20
30
40
AM
1 ca
lcu
late
d P
ola
riza
bii
ty (
An
gst
rom
3) Std. dev. = 2.99 Å3
PM3 : 4.44 Å3
MNDO : 1.94 Å3
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
pxsf
pxxpf
sxxsf
isp
iipp
iiss
Parametrized Method (AM1)Parametrized Method (AM1)Test SetTest Set
Std. dev. = 0.70 Å3
PM3 : 0.74 Å3
MNDO : 0.78 Å30 10 20 30 40
Experimental Polarizabilty (Angstrom3)
0
10
20
30
40
AM
1 ca
lcu
late
d P
ola
riza
bii
ty (
An
gst
rom
3)
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
G. Schürer, P. Gedeck, M. Gottschalk,T. Clark, Int. J.Quant. Chem., 1999, 75, 17-31.
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Atomic and “Orbital-“ Atomic and “Orbital-“ PolarizabilitiesPolarizabilities
didi YYXXQ
AA
Amol NαQα
24
Additivity:
Partitioning:
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Askskkkssspppkk
kppssssij
iji ijjiji PPPPffPfPfPX 22
A
spkssk
jAkssk
iA
jA
iA
AAijd
fPPPxPPPx
xxPP
X
iijj 22
1
2
1
2
1
,
2
pxsf
pxxpf
sxxsf
isp
iipp
iiss
One-Center TermsOne-Center Terms
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
AB
BspAspksskksskkkkkssiji ffPPPPPPPY i
BABjA
jBAB
iA
iB
jA
jB
iABA ,,2
2
1
AB
AspiBk
jBk
Bs
BspjAk
iAk
As
iB
jA
jB
iA
BA
ijd
fxPxPP
fxPxPPxxxxP
YjA
iAA
iB
jBB
,
,2
)(2
)(2)(
2
1
Two-Center TermsTwo-Center Terms
B. Martin, P. Gedeck, T. Clark, Int. J. Quant. Chem., 2000, 77, 473.
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
The Additive Molecular The Additive Molecular Polarizability (AM1)Polarizability (AM1)
Std. dev. = 0.59
PM3 : 0.65
MNDO : 0.60
0 10 20 30 40 50
Experimental PolarizabillityC
0
10
20
30
40
50
Cal
cula
ted
Po
lari
zab
ilit
y C
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Atomic Polarizability Tensors:Atomic Polarizability Tensors:pp-Bromotoluene-Bromotoluene
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local PolarizabilityLocal Polarizability
1
1
1
1
NAOs
j j jj
L NAOs
j jj
q
q
1j Density due to a singly occupied atomic orbital j
jq Coulson population of atomic orbital j
j Mean polarizability calculated for atomic orbital j
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Local PolarizabilityLocal Polarizability
F
Br
Cl
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Correlations Between Local Properties Correlations Between Local Properties on Molecular Surfaceson Molecular Surfaces
MEP IEL EAL L L
MEP 1
IEL 0.15 1
EAL -.12 0.18 1
L 0.21 0.81 -.44 1
L 0.29 0.19 0.51 -.14 1
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
PC-number
0
2
4
6
8
PC
-Eig
enva
lue
10
30
50
70
90
Cu
mla
tive
% v
aria
nce
Eigenvalues% Variance
PC-Eigenvalues (Maybridge)PC-Eigenvalues (Maybridge)
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Principal ComponentsPrincipal Components
Nr. Descriptors % Variance
1 Electrostatic descriptors, local donor/acceptor descriptors. 23.2
2 Local electron affinity descriptors, local polarizability descriptors
15.9
3 Molecular weight, volume, area, globularity 13.7
(23% before)
4 MEP-derived descriptors 8.2
5 Acceptor properties 7.5
6 Polarizability 4.8
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Boiling Points (N = 5453):Boiling Points (N = 5453):Leave 10% out Cross-validation “old“ and “new“ descriptorsLeave 10% out Cross-validation “old“ and “new“ descriptors
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Experimental Boiling Point (°c)
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Cal
cula
ted
Boi
ling
Poi
nt (
°c)
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500
Experimental Boiling Point (°c)
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Cal
cula
ted
Boi
ling
Poi
nt (
°c)
18 Descriptors(18:10:1 = 239 weights)MSE = 0.02MUE = 17.3RMSD = 24.9
10 Descriptors(10:9:1 = 128 weights)MSE = 0.3MUE = 14.6RMSD = 21.0
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Surface-integral modelsSurface-integral models
1
, , , ,ntri
i i i i i iL L L L
i
P f V IE EA A
•P = target property
•Ai = area of triangle i
•ntri = number of triangles
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Surface-integral modelsSurface-integral models•MolFESD:
•Pixner, P.; Heiden, W.; Merx, H.; Möller, A.; Moeckel, G.; Brickmann, J. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1309-1319.
•Jäger, T.; Schmidt, F.; Schilling, B.; Brickmann, J. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2000, 14, 631-646
•Jäger, R.; Kast, S. M.; Brickmann,. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 237-247.
•GB/PSA:
•Best, S. A.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Reynolds, C. H.. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10479-10487.
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Free energies of hydrationFree energies of hydration
0 -20 -40 -60 -80 -100
Experimental Gsolv(H2O) (kcal mol-1)
0
-20
-40
-60
-80
-100C
alcu
late
d
Gso
lv(H
2O)
(kca
l mo
l-1)
MSE = 0.00
MUE = 1.18
RMSD = 1.69
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Free energies of hydrationFree energies of hydration
0
Experimental Gsolv(H2O) (kcal mol-1)
0
Cal
cula
ted
G
solv
(H2O
) (k
cal m
ol-1
)
MSE = 0.00
MUE = 0.79
RMSD = 1.08
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Free energies of solvation: Free energies of solvation: nn-octanol-octanol
-10 -6 -2 2
Experimental Gsolv(C8H18) (kcal mol-1)
-10
-6
-2
2C
alcu
late
d
Gso
lv(C
8H18
) (k
cal m
ol-1
)MSE = 0.00
MUE = 0.76
RMSD = 1.00
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Free energies of solvation: Free energies of solvation: chloroformchloroform
-14 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2
Experimental Gsolv(CHCl3) (kcal mol-1)
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
Cal
cula
ted
G
solv
(CH
Cl 3)
(kc
al m
ol-1
)MSE = 0.00
MUE = 0.48
RMSD = 0.74
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Enthalpies of hydrationEnthalpies of hydration
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0
Experimental Hsolv(H2O) (kcal mol-1)
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
Cal
cula
ted
H
solv
(H2O
) (k
cal m
ol-1
)
MSE = 0.00
MUE = 1.74
RMSD = 2.10
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Partial solvationPartial solvation
Ligand
Water
Receptor
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Sources of dataSources of data• The available data are limited in
• Number• Quality
• Use alternative sources
• e.g. for solvation free energies• Gas phase proton affinites (G3)
• pKas
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Physical-Property MappingPhysical-Property Mapping
• Maybridge used as the “chemistry“ dataset
• Use the top six principal components to train a 100 100 Kohonen net (unsupervised training)
• 2,105 compounds selected from the World Drug Index as real drugs used as the drug dataset
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Physical Property MapPhysical Property Map
“chemistry“
TrainKohonen
Net
“Drugs“
“Drugs“
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Physical Property Map: DrugsPhysical Property Map: Drugs
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Physical Property Map: HormonesPhysical Property Map: Hormones
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Model Applicabilty, Maps as Model Applicabilty, Maps as
Models?Models?
Aqueous solubility
550 (ompounds)
Computer-Chemie-Centrum Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments• Dr. Bernd Beck Dr. Andrew Chalk• Dr. Peter Gedeck Dr. Bill King • Dr. Harry Lanig Dr. Torsten Schindler• Dr. Cenk Selçuki Dr. Paul Winget• Matthias Brüstle Bernd Ehresmann• Matthias Hennemann Anselm Horn • Bodo Martin Gudrun Schürer • Kendall Byler Jr-Hung Lin
• Dr. Tim F. Mitchell (Cambridge Combinatorial) • Prof. Johnny Gasteiger
• Pfizer (Dr. Alexander Alex, Dr. Marcel de Groot)• Bayer Pharma (Dr. Andreas Göller, Dr. Jörg Kenderich)• 4SC Scientific (Dr. Thomas Herz)• Alexander-von-Humboldt Foundation• Hewlett-Packard