Computational Sciences Center High-Speed Flow … · Integrity ! Service ! Excellence Computational...
Transcript of Computational Sciences Center High-Speed Flow … · Integrity ! Service ! Excellence Computational...
Integrity « Service « Excellence
Computational Sciences Center High-Speed Flow Research
2014
Dr. Jonathan Poggie Senior Aerospace Engineer
AFRL/RQHF Air Force Research Laboratory
Hypersonic Technology
High-‐Speed Strike Weapon
Scramjet Mach 5-‐8
Space Access
Rocket Mach 20+
Penetra6ng Regional ISR / Strike
Scramjet Mach ≈5
Tac6cal Boost-‐Glide / Prompt Global Strike
Rocket Mach = 10-‐20
2 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
High-Speed Flow Research Team Computational Sciences Center
• Government Employees – Dr. Nicholas Bisek – Dr. Ryan Gosse – Mr. Eswar Josyula – Dr. Joel Malo-Molina – Dr. Jonathan Poggie
• Basic Research Contractors – Dr. Jon Burt – Dr. Timothy Leger
• Application Support Contactors – Mr. D. Galbraith – Mr. W. Humphrey
• AFRL Partners – Dr. Mark Hagenmaier (scramjet flows) – Dr. Roger Kimmel (transition, SWBLI unsteadiness, flight tests)
• CCAS Partners – Dr. Datta Gaitonde (FDL3DI code, SWBLI unsteadiness, BL trips) – Dr. Graham Candler (US3D code, thermophysics)
3 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Main Research Themes
1. LES and DES as engineering tools 2. Fatigue loading 3. Inlet flows 4. Selected topics in aerothermal prediction
4 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
1. LES and DES as Engineering Tools
• Large-scale computations • Computational methodology • Verification and validation
5 Gosse, US3D, HIFiRE-‐6 Sherer, HIFiRE-‐6
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
DoD HPCMP Frontier Project
6
Year CPU-‐Hrs (millions)
2014 90
2015 150
2016 211
2017 890*
2018 890*
Title: Unsteady Pressure and HeaPng Environment on High-‐Speed Vehicles with Responding Structures PI: Dr. Ryan Gosse, AFRL/RQHV
• MulP-‐disciplinary simulaPons • Disparate space and Pme scales • UPlize significant fracPon of machine
(10k – 100k cores) • Develop procedures for large jobs,
large data
Garnet / ERDC: 150k cores
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Hybrid Parallelism
7
• Exploit fine-‐grained parallelism with vectorizaPon and threads (OpenMP)
• Support domain decomposiPon with MPI
• Minimum block size set by compact difference numerics
• Use threads to scale to more cores at same accuracy
Scaling with Blocks and Threads
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow
8
Density contours, ρ/ρ∞
M = 2.3, 2.9 Reθi = 2000, 2500 106 to 109 cells Up to 32k cores Up to 8 threads Poggie et al., AIAA Paper 2014-‐0423
Poggie, AIAA 2014-‐xxxx
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Comparison to Experiment: Boundary Layer Profiles
9
Mean Profiles Streamwise Fluctua6ons
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Comparison to Experiment: Spatial Correlations
10
Data
Computation
Thus, the pseudo-intermittency can be expressed as:
c ! I1 " I y# $I1 " I2
! "#5$
Figure 7 shows the pseudo-intermittency profile cal-culated in this manner. An intermittency profile (Seliget al. 1989) derived using a VITA-based threshold tech-nique from hotwire data obtained in the same boundarylayer flow is included for comparison. The shape of theprofiles is quite similar, but they are offset by about 0.3d.The offset may well be due to differences in the thresholdfor defining turbulent fluid.
4.1.2CorrelationsA spatial correlation function was calculated over a set ofimages between the scattering intensity recorded at eachpixel in the field of view and the scattering intensity at areference location. The correlation coefficient was definedby the following formula:
R x; r# $ !PN
i!1 Ii x# $ " !I% & Ii x' r# $ " !I% &#########################################################################PNi!1 Ii x# $ " !I% &2
PNi!1 Ii x' r# $ " !I% &2
q #6$
where I is the intensity of scattered light recorded by thevideo camera, x is a reference location, and r is a relativedisplacement vector. This type of correlation mimics thecross-correlation between a pair of point probes at zerotime delay.
Figure 8 shows contour plots of the two-point cross-correlation for several heights in the boundary layer. Thedomain corresponds to the central third of the field of viewin Fig. 4. A set of N=400 images was used to calculate thecorrelation in each case. The correlation contours are seento be approximately elliptical in shape. Large regions ofhigh correlation are seen near the middle of the boundarylayer (Fig. 8b, c). In contrast, lower correlation levels andshorter length scales occur close to the freestream(Fig. 8a), where only the tips of the bulges reach, and nearthe wall (Fig. 8d), where fingers of freestream fluid rarelyreach.
Another feature of the plots is the changing inclinationof the principal axis of the ellipse-like correlation con-tours. This angle (h) was measured graphically from thecorrelation plots like the examples in Fig. 8, and is plottedin Fig. 9 as a function of height in the boundary layer. Theorientation of the principal axis varies from horizontal atthe mean boundary layer edge to about 45! at 0.6d, whereit stays constant until scatter is introduced due to lack ofresolution in the flow visualization near the wall.
Quite similar structure angles were observed (Spinaet al. 1991b) in space–time correlations of hotwire massflux data for small wire separations. For a wire separationof 0.09d, a structure angle of 45!–50! was obtained in therange 0.2 £ y/d £ 0.8 (Fig. 10).
A similar correlation analysis has been done of theplan-view images (Poggie 1991), but is omitted here for thesake of brevity. The results showed elliptical correlationcontours, elongated in the streamwise direction, withprincipal axes on the order of 1.0d and 0.5d at y/d=0.5.These results are also consistent with hotwire space–timecorrelations (Spina et al. 1991b).
Fig. 7. Pseudo-intermittency profiles through the Mach 2.9turbulent boundary layer. Solid line is image data, open circles ishotwire data from Selig et al. (1989)
Fig. 8. Two-point cross-corre-lations of side-view images ofthe turbulent boundary layer.Horizontal line indicates posi-tion of wall
444
D. Smith et al., AIAA 91-0651 Poggie et al., Experiments in Fluids, 2004
Flow
Experiment
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
kz
+
E(k
z)
10-3
10-2
10-1
10-9
10-7
10-5
10-3
10-1
101
Lz/!
0 = 5
Lz/!
0 = 10
Lz/!
0 = 20
Boundary Layer Fluctuations: Effect of Domain Width
Density 20 δ0
10 δ0
5 δ0
Mass Flux (ρu)’ z-‐Wavenumber Spectrum
Increasing Lz
x/δ0 = 100 y/δ = 0.5
Downstream View y-‐z-‐plane, x/δ0 = 100
ResoluPon: Δx+ = 6 Δy+ = 0.5-‐9 Δz+ = 5 Δt+ = 0.05
11 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
2. Fatigue Loading
12
Shock Interaction on Flat Panel
• Fatigue loading from unsteady SWBLI very serious design concern
• Typical for Mach 5 Cruise: 147 dB, 800 K (Zuchowski, AFRL TR, 2012)
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Separation Bubble as Amplifier
13
AAmplifier
Input:Turbulence
!(f)Filter
Output:Shock Motion
• Plotkin (AIAA J, 1975) • Linearly-‐damped Brownian
moPon • Time scales: τu << τR • Predicts spectrum,
autocorrelaPon, fluctuaPon intensity
• Frequency-‐selecPve amplifier
• Cut-‐off frequency set by separaPon bubble characterisPcs
• Input set by TBL t/! R
Rp(t
)
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
2!f" R
Gp(f
)/("
R#
p2)
fGp(f
)/#
p2
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Spectrum AutocorrelaPon Wall Pressure Sta6s6cs
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Flight Test Experiments
HIFiRE-1
• HIFiRE Flight 1: Woomera Range, March 22, 2010 • Documentation: Stanfield, Kimmel, and Adamczak,
AIAA Papers (2012-2013)
14
Kulite Transducer Stations
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
2!f"R
G(f
)/("
R#
p2)
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
x/$0 = 67.0x/$0 = 68.0x/$0 = 69.0Plotkin (1975)
Wall Pressure Spectra
Computational Results Experimental Results
Various configurations, M = 2-5 Compression ramp, M = 2.3, 24 deg
HIFiRE-1 Flight Data Large-Scale
Shock Motion
Boundary Layer Turbulence
15
LES captures large-scale unsteadiness J. Poggie, N. J. Bisek, R. L. Kimmel, and S. A. Stanfield, “Spectral CharacterisPcs of SeparaPon Shock Unsteadiness,” AIAA Journal, in press, 2014.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Effect of Control
Reduced: • Size of separation bubble • Energy in low-frequency wall pressure fluctuations • Fatigue loading
Baseline Case Control Case PSD of TKE
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 1010
!5
10!4
10!3
10!2
10!1
100
PowerSpectralDensityofTKE
Normalized Frequency, f l/U!
baselineperfectpulsedrealBaseline
Control
24° Ramp Mach 2.3 Reθ = 2000
16
Bisek, Rizzetta, and Poggie, AIAA Journal, 2013
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Fluid / Hot Structure Interaction
Pressure
Density
• Non-‐equilibrium LES with moving grid • Non-‐linear structural response
Supersonic Flow over Deflected Panel Large-‐Scale Separa6on Shock Oscilla6on Drives Structural Dynamics
M = 5
Panel Responds
Data: Maestrello and Linden (1970)
R. Gosse US3D
17 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
3. Inlet Flows
• Corner flow interactions • RANS modeling • LES
18
R. Gosse, US3D Code, HIFiRE-‐6
X-‐51
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Corner Interactions in Inlet Flows
19
x=0
x=-‐1/2
x=0
x=-‐1/2
Inviscid flow
incident sho
ck
impingement lin
e
Benek, Suchyta, and Babinsky (2014) RANS SimulaPons (Overflow, non-‐eq. k-‐ω) M = 2.9, α = 13°, W/H = 1, δ/W = 0.07
Mean Flow Streamlines
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Effect of Boundary Layer Blockage on Separation Scale
20
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000
Δx/fδ
δ/gW
Scaled M=2.9 W=13
M=2.9 W=10
M=2.9 W=8
M=2.5 W=13
M=2.5 W=10
M=2.5 W=8
M=2.9 W=13
M=2.9 W=10
M=2.9 W=8
M=2.5 W=13
M=2.5 W=10
M=2.5 W=8
Δx DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
LES for Corner Flows
M = 2.3, Reθ = 2400 HFILES, FDL3DI Code 1.06x109 cells 13240 processors ~2 weeks
N. Bisek, AIAA Paper 2014-‐0558
Mach 2.3 Turbulent Corner Flow
21 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Corner-Ramp Configuration
22
M = 2.3, Reθ = 2400 HFILES, FDL3DI Code 750 Mcells 47040 processors (5880 tasks x 8 threads)
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
4. Selected Topics in Aerothermal Prediction
Pressure Contours RANS for 3D Interac6ons 23° Sharp Fin M = 5.0, Reθ = 7400 DLR Experiments: Schülein et al. (2001)
US3D Code
Streamwise Profile of Wall Heat Flux
23
Leger and Poggie, AIAA 2014-‐0951
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Direct Numerical Simulation of Laminar-Turbulent Transition
24
Wall Heat Flux
Trip
“Pizza-‐Box” Trip
Flight Test ArPcle
Trip
Cost/run: 3200 processors for 120 hours
HIFiRE-‐1 Boundary Layer Trip Experiment
Gronvall, Bisek, and Poggie, AIAA Paper 2014-‐0433 Kimmel and Adamczak, AIAA Paper 2011-‐3413
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
State-to-State Kinetics: Influence on Wall Heat Flux
25
( )[ ] ciciccici VVvt
ωρρ =++•∇+∂
∂ ~
DVEMDTDHC qqqqq +++=
Ø Master equation for V-V/V-T ü 48 quantum levels for nitrogen"ü FHO rates"ü Self-diffusion in vibrational states"
Ø Transport coeffs from Wang-Chang Uhlenbeck eqn (Boltzmann equation with internal energy) Ø Contributions to heat transfer: heat conductivity (HC), thermal diffusion (TD), mass diffusion (MD), and diffusion of vibrational energy (DVE)
Contribution of Heat Conduction to Total Heat Flux
Josyula et al, 2014
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Unsteady Scramjet Flameholder
26 Instantaneous fuel mole fracPon for 56SLPM and 99SLPM cases
Mean fuel mole fracPon for 56SLPM and 99SLPM cases
Streamwise velocity profiles for RANS (red) hybrid RANS and LES (black) and experiment (symbols)
• Mach 2 cavity flameholder simulated using hybrid RANS/LES (US3D)
• Compared to PIV data
• Characterization of turbulence and mixing in cavity for non-reacting cases
Numerical InvesPgaPon of a Supersonic Cavity Flameholder, David M. Peterson, Ezeldin A. Hassan, Steven G. Tuxle, Mark A. Hagenmaier, Campbell D. Carter, AIAA 2014-‐1158.
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
Summary
1. LES and DES as engineering tools 2. Fatigue loading 3. Inlet flows 4. Selected topics in aerothermal prediction
27 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. 88ABW-2014-3059