Comprehensive,State,Energy,Planning:,The,“What”, ·...
Transcript of Comprehensive,State,Energy,Planning:,The,“What”, ·...
+
Comprehensive State Energy Planning: The “What” NASEO Affiliates’ State Energy Planning Taskforce April 1, 2015
+ Agenda
n Welcome Taskforce Co-‐Chairs: Ashley Duckman, American Gas Associa<on and Kristy Manning, Missouri Division of Energy
n Refresher: What is the State Energy Planning Taskforce? Sandy Fazeli, NASEO
n Snapshot of Content in State Plans Melissa Savage and Sandy Fazeli, NASEO
n Q&A and Discussion
2
+ What (and why) is the State Energy Planning Taskforce?
n Established to help create a more direct link between NASEO Affiliates’ knowledge of the energy industry, technologies, and private sector best prac<ces with States’ policy and planning exper<se and mandates.
n Will explore both the “What” and the “How” of State Energy Planning
n Kick-‐off call: January 6, 2015, introduce structure of Taskforce and general principles of State energy Planning. Explored VA and MO plans.
n New website and co-‐chairs: h`p://naseo.org/planning-‐taskforce
n NASEO Staff to contact with ideas and ques<ons: n Sandy Fazeli, NASEO: [email protected] n Melissa Savage, NASEO: [email protected]
3
+ Timeline/Materials n Bi-‐monthly, discussion-‐oriented calls
n Goal: to create an addendum to NASEO’s signature resource: State Energy Planning Guidelines: A Guide to Develop a Comprehensive State Energy Plan plus Supplemental Policy and Program Op=ons, we will use findings from bi-‐monthly calls and case studies elevated to: n Develop a drag outline of the addendum, to be discussed and refined on a Taskforce call;
n Develop a drag version of the addendum, to be discussed on a Taskforce call and reviewed electronically by Taskforce members;
n Finalize and release to NASEO State and Affiliate members the final addendum.
n Report-‐out from Taskforce at September 2015 Annual Mee<ng in San Diego, CA
4
+ Taskforce Approach
Calls (Affiliates and Guest States)
Stakeholder Engagement Strategies
(The “How”)
Plan Content and ConsideraOons (The “What”)
5
What types of state policies and programs work well in your experience? What types of state policies and programs have created roadblocks?
How would you recommend state energy planners engage your company or organiza<on during the planning process?
DraQ development (NASEO) and
review (Affiliates)
Report/PresentaOon at NASEO Annual MeeOng (September 2015)
+ Content in State Energy Plans Trends and State Examples
6
+ Trends n Energy resources (e.g., hydro, coal, oil, natural gas) vary by state
n Customer-‐sited genera<on and demand-‐side management ac<vi<es (in the electricity and transporta<on sectors) that are broadly applicable to all states
n Program/policy op<ons typically addressed include: n Energy Efficiency n Renewable Energy Grid Integra<on n Clean and Efficient Transporta<on n Financing Mechanisms n Evalua<on and Measurement for Con<nuous Improvement n Energy Assurance and Emergency Response
+ Governor Involvement in State Energy Planning: Michigan Example
n March 2015: Snyder creates new agency focused on energy www.freep.com/story/news/poli<cs/2015/03/18/new-‐energy-‐agency-‐created-‐gov-‐rick-‐snyder/24965469/
8
n 2013: Governor Snyder sets goals for “No Regrets” energy future” in media roundtable (see video)
n 2012: Governor Snyder’s Special Message on Ensuring our Future: Energy and the Environment: h`p://www.michigan.gov/documents/snyder/EE_Message_FINAL_pdf_404563_7.pdf
h`ps://youtu.be/YXaHrg2REUg
+ Minnesota Energy Policy and Conserva<on Quadrennial Report (2012)
n Summarizes past policies, programs
n Electricity: building base load; Increasing reliance on natural gas genera<on; Transmission infrastructure construc<on and upgrades; Bulk energy storage
n Renewables: Genera<on through wind, PV, biomass, hydro; policies like RES; Programs such as green pricing, rebates
n Natural Gas: increasing demand; supply availability; price vola<lity; service quality and reliability
n Transporta<on Fuels: petroleum refinery opera<ng prac<ces; commercial drivers’ hours of service; alt fuel and advance vehicle technologies
n Conserva<on: data, M&V, building benchmarking; codes; CHP
n Other priori<es: affordability; community-‐scale EE/RE projects; energy literacy; energy assurance
9
h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/Energy-‐Quad-‐Report2012.pdf
+ 2014 Drag New York State Energy Plan
n Ini<a<ves: n EE policies: refining rate and economic incen<ves; using ratepayer funds for EE projects that
are economic but face addressable barriers; low-‐income and underserved communi<es
n New business models for u<li<es, ESCOs, and consumers: resource diversity; work with wholesale markets; demand-‐side management; distributed resources
n Building codes and standards: training, progressive codes n Financing: public-‐private partnerships; green bank n Renewable portolio: incen<ves, reduce sog costs;
community-‐based
n Modernize electric and gas delivery systems n Community-‐based energy planning: microgrids n Strengthen liquid fuels distribu<on systems,
reduce petroleum reliance
n Promote consumer choice and educa<on in energy usage through improved data, labeling
n Encourage innova<on and commercializa<on n Foster clean energy workforce
10
h`p://energyplan.ny.gov/Plans/2014.aspx
+ Colorado State Energy Report 2014
n Priori<es: growing jobs and spurring innova<on; protec<ng Colorado’s world-‐class environment; streamlining government; encouraging collabora<on
n Efficiency: weatheriza<on; HERS; expand green MLS; energy-‐efficient mortgages; expand private and public sector ESPC; agricultural energy efficiency program; demand side management
n Alt Fuels: SNG infrastructure; EV deployment; natural gas, propane, electric fleets (2018 goal)
n Energy Resources: solar, wind, landfill gas, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, coal mine methane; implement and accelerate renewables by expanding RES
n Jobs/Innova<on: recogni<on for green businesses; promote career paths in engineering and applied sciences for highschool students
11
h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/The%20Colorado%20State%20Energy%20Report%202014.pdf
h`p://www.kunc.org/post/helping-‐colorado-‐dairymen-‐lighten-‐your-‐milks-‐energy-‐load
+ California’s 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report
n Energy Efficiency: standards, comprehensive retrofits, zero-‐net energy, engaging u<li<es, geothermal heat pump and ground loop technologies
n Demand response: enable market op<ons to promote viable DR strategies; CA ISO-‐CPUC partnership; customer educa<on
n Bioenergy: biomass collec<on and distribu<on; biomass-‐use goals; support R&D; refine procurement prac<ces
n Electricity: grid reliability; promote inter-‐agency coordina<on to align planning cycles
n Strategic transmission investment: increase par<cipa<on in CA ISO’s energy imbalance market; reduce permiwng <me for transmission projects
n Nuclear Power: conduct hazard, safety analyses; evaluate spent fuel storage; support federal efforts to develop an integrated system for management and disposal of nuclear waste
n Natural Gas: examine interdependency natural gas-‐electricity; evaluate op<ons for expor<ng LNG
n Transporta<on: ZEV ac<on plan; na<onal Renewable Fuel Standard Goals; low-‐carbon biofuels; rebates for EV, NGV, and hydrogen vehicles; op<mize altuel infrastructure;
n Climate Change: research vulnerability; RD&D for GHG reduc<on technologies; promote local planning; coordinate among CA agencies;
12
h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/CEC-‐100-‐2013-‐001-‐CMF.pdf
+ Discussion kick-‐starters
13
What types of state policies and programs work well in your experience? What types of state policies and programs have created roadblocks?
What has been presented today that you agree with?
What do you disagree with?
What is missing?
+ Thank you! Key Contacts:
Affiliates Engagement Lead: Sandy Fazeli, [email protected] State Energy Planning Lead: Melissa Savage, [email protected]