Comprehensive Africa

Agriculture Development

Programme (CAADP) and

M&E**

Greenwell Matchaya, PhD

Ph

oto

: D

avid

Bra

zie

r/IW

MI

Ph

oto

:T

om

va

n C

ake

nb

erg

he

/IW

MI

Ph

oto

: D

avid

Bra

zie

r/IW

MI

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Greenwell Matchaya, PhD

ReSAKSS-SA Coordinator

g.matchaya@cgiar.org

July 4th, 2014

Antananarivo, Madagascar**with guidance from NPCA and ReSAKSS

• Stands for the comprehensive African Agricultural Development program

• It is a political response to the problems of poverty and food insecurity in Africa.

• The NEPAD in 2001 and CAADP in 2003 emerged as continental

CAADP

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

• The NEPAD in 2001 and CAADP in 2003 emerged as continental development policy frameworks

• CAADP is a strategic framework to guide investments across four specific pillars, as well as investments in strengthening institutional capacity across the pillars in the sector

• These investments would then reverse the agricultural stagnation

Goal of CAADP

• Help African countries reach and maintain a higher path ofeconomic growth through agriculturally-led developmentthat reduces mass poverty, food insecurity and hunger.

Targets of CAADP

• Allocating 10% of national budgets to agriculture

Goals and Targets of CAADP

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

• Allocating 10% of national budgets to agriculture

• 6% average annual growth in the agriculture

• MDG 1 - reduce poverty and hunger by half by 2015,

CAADP implementation

Has four pillars• Pillar 1: Extending the area under sustainable land

management and reliable water control systems

• Pillar 2: Improving rural infrastructure and trade related capacities for market access

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

related capacities for market access

• Pillar 3: Increasing food supply, reducing hunger and improving responses to food emergency crises; and

• Pillar 4: Improving agriculture research, technology dissemination and adoption.

Pillar Institutions

NPCA

Implementation and coordination

AUC

political leadership

CAADP Stakeholders

Continental level

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

CAADP Country team + DPs

Nationale Governments – Reform and review of existing policies to achieve MDGs, development of Investment plans

RECs

coordination of CAADP , regional integration

technical expertiseRegional level

National level

Lessons over 10 years • Inclusiveness and negotiating across various interests -

an essential factor in driving policy implementation• The 10%, 6% targets are still valid today as they were in

2003• Countries are looking for answers as to HOW they can

achieve growth in agriculture and reduce poverty

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

• The past also shows that growth without development is possible unless inclusive policies are in place

• CAADP places a higher premium on knowledge, data and analysis and capacity building to support NAIPS

• The 10 percent spending is not enough if we don’t talk of quality of spending

M&E- Major lessons / shifts

From To

One focal point to drive

CAADP in the countries

A CAADP Country team to manage

the process strategically and

professionally

Facilitation through RECs

and consultants

Facilitation through a CAADP

Resource Group, composed of

RECs, AUC, Nepad, Pillars

Compact as a major focus Focus on impact and outcomes of Compact as a major focus

of the CAADP process

Focus on impact and outcomes of

the process, negotiated with the

countries leading to improved

performance and capacities to

reach 6 % growth

Primary focus on

government

in implementation

Focus on collective responsibility by

govt, civil society, private sector and

other actors

Capacity and institutional

arrangements and implementation

modalities are part of planning

Major lessons / shifts

From To

Implementation driven by

‘directives’ of higher levels

Implementation driven by value

addition

Exploring value addition by CAADP

with the countries and design

implementation accordingly

Mechanical and rather

static process

Dynamic and systemic process,

focusing on organisational

development, implementation development, implementation

capacity and quality strategic

process design & management and

continuous learning

Use of ‘isolated

consultants’

Use of the knowledge systems and

institutions to build fundamental

relationships, arrangements and

capacities which link planning to

knowledge, information and

networks (‘Building functioning

systems’)

Major lessons / shifts

From To

Process funded through

isolated donor support for

country implementation

Workplan-based funding from

MDTF and other sources

Limited analytical work to

economic modelling by

consultants

Comprehensive analytical work

through knowledge & information

support system (pillars and

knowledge centers)

Initial engagement process

with government at

different levels

Intensive engagement process with

government, stakeholders and the

public for ownership, leadership

and accountability of the process

Main focus on investment

priorities

Focus on improving national

development strategies and

programs through review of

existing strategies and

plans/programmes

Pro

gre

ss in C

en

tral A

frica, 2

00

3-1

0

0 5

10

15

Burundi

Cameroon

Central

African Rep.

Chad

Congo, Dem.

Congo, Rep.

Equatorial

Guinea

Sao Tome &

Principe

PercentC

en

tral A

frica

•S

ha

res in

crea

sed

in B

uru

nd

i, Re

p o

f Co

ng

o, a

nd

Sã

o To

mé

a

nd

Prin

cipe

•S

ha

res d

eclin

ed

or sta

gn

ate

d in

oth

er co

un

tries, w

hich

a

lso sp

en

d le

ss tha

n 5

%

Burundi

Cameroon

Central

African Rep.

Chad

Congo, Dem.

Rep.

Congo, Rep.

Equatorial

Guinea

Sao Tome &

Principe

Progress in East Africa , 2003-10

0

5

10

15

20

25

Dji

bo

uti

Eth

iop

ia

Ke

nya

Ma

da

ga

sca

r

Ma

uri

tiu

s

Rw

an

da

Se

ych

ell

es

So

uth

Su

da

n

Su

da

n

Tan

zan

ia

Ug

an

da

Pe

rce

nt

East Africa

• Many countries in East Africa spend 5-10% percent of total expenditure on agriculture

• Shares have increased over time in several countries (especially Ethiopia, Rwanda, Sudan)

Dji

bo

uti

Eth

iop

ia

Ke

nya

Ma

da

ga

sca

r

Ma

uri

tiu

s

Rw

an

da

Se

ych

ell

es

So

uth

Su

da

n

Su

da

n

Tan

zan

ia

Ug

an

da

0

5

10

15

Alg

eri

a

Eg

yp

t

Ma

uri

tan

ia

Mo

rocc

o

Tun

isia

Pe

rce

nt

North Africa

Progress in North Africa , 2003-10

• Shares have stagnated in Mauritania and diverged

downwards from the 10% target in the other

countries

Alg

eri

a

Eg

yp

t

Ma

uri

tan

ia

Mo

rocc

o

Tun

isia

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

An

go

la

Bo

tsw

an

a

Leso

tho

Ma

law

i

Mo

zam

biq

ue

Na

mib

ia

So

uth

Afr

ica

Sw

azi

lan

d

Za

mb

ia

Zim

ba

bw

e

Pe

rce

nt

Southern

Africa

Progress in Southern Africa , 2003-10

• Malawi is outstanding performer, with nearly three times the target in recent years

• Apart from Zambia, shares have stagnated or declined in the other countries

An

go

la

Bo

tsw

an

a

Leso

tho

Ma

law

i

Mo

zam

biq

ue

Na

mib

ia

So

uth

Afr

ica

Sw

azi

lan

d

Za

mb

ia

Zim

ba

bw

e

05

10152025

Bu

rkin

a F

aso

Ca

pe

Ve

rde

Co

te d

'Ivo

ire

Ga

mb

ia

Gh

an

a

Gu

ine

a

Gu

ine

a-…

Lib

eri

a

Ma

li

Nig

er

Nig

eri

a

Se

ne

ga

l

Sie

rra

Le

on

e

Tog

o

Pe

rce

nt

West Africa

Progress in West Africa , 2003-10

• Region where many countries have achieved target

• Shares have increased in many countries

• Burkina Faso and Mali (and Niger in recent years) have

consistently cut back on the shares towards the target level

Bu

rkin

a F

aso

Ca

pe

Ve

rde

Co

te d

'Ivo

ire

Ga

mb

ia

Gh

an

a

Gu

ine

a

Gu

ine

a

Lib

eri

a

Ma

li

Nig

er

Nig

eri

a

Se

ne

ga

l

Sie

rra

Le

on

e

Tog

o

For more information on CAADP visit

http://www.nepad-caadp.net/

For more information on ReSAKSS research and For more information on ReSAKSS research and

CAADP support visit

WWW.RESAKSS.ORG