Composite Stress Analysis

133
Title of Document: (Three Lines Maximum) FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Doc. Number: RAS-CC670-203 Revision Letter: NC Date (yyyy-mm-dd): 2000-04-20 Status of Document: (Draft / Preliminary) (Enter nothing if Report has no Status or select the above row and do “F9” to enter your Status) Classification: (Restricted / Private / Confidential) (Enter nothing if Report has no Classification or select the above row and do F9” to enter your Classification) Total of pages : 126 Section number: 16 Section Title: (Two Lines Maximum) OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS Initial Approval Names: DATE PREPARED: SHELLEY CLARKE ----- CHECKED: JOHN HUDDART ----- APPROVED: SALAMON HARAVAN ----- BT0107-01 MW97 1999-03 Enter the applicable data in the respective fields below by clicking the text and do F9 to have the filling box . When all known basic identification data is entered, select “Print Preview” to update the information in the document. TEMPLATE PREPARED AND MODIFIED AS OF 1999-03-12

description

aerospace

Transcript of Composite Stress Analysis

Page 1: Composite Stress Analysis

Title of Document:(Three Lines Maximum)

FIXED TRAILING EDGESTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Doc. Number: RAS-CC670-203

Revision Letter: NC

Date (yyyy-mm-dd): 2000-04-20

Status of Document:(Draft / Preliminary) (Enter nothing if Report has no Status or select theabove row and do “F9” to enter your Status)

Classification:(Restricted / Private / Confidential) (Enter nothing if Report has noClassification or select the above row and do “F9” to enter your Classification)

Total of pages : 126

Section number: 16

Section Title:(Two Lines Maximum)

OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTEDOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

Initial Approval Names: DATE

PREPARED: SHELLEY CLARKE -----

CHECKED: JOHN HUDDART -----

APPROVED: SALAMON HARAVAN -----

BT0107-01 MW97 1999-03

Enter the applicable data in the respective fields below byclicking the text and do F9 to have the filling box .

When all known basic identif ication data isentered, select “Print Preview” to update theinformation in the document.

TEMPLATE PREPARED AND MODIFIED AS OF 1999-03-12

Page 2: Composite Stress Analysis

Bombardier Inc.Montréal, Canada

CAGE CODE 88308

BOMBARDIER INC., PAR L’INTERMÉDIAIRE DE SES GROUPES,DIVISIONS ET/OU FILIALES CORPORATIVES, FOURNIT LESPRÉSENTS RENSEIGNEMENTS AU GOUVERNEMENT À TITRECONFIDENTIEL. CES RENSEIGNEMENTS ONT UNE TENEURCONFIDENTIELLE, AVEC DROITS DE PROPRIÉTÉ, ET NOUS LESCONSIDÉRONS EXCLUS DE L’APPLICATION DE LA LOI SURL’ACCÈS À L’INFORMATION. ILS PEUVENT AUSSI CONSTITUER UNSECRET INDUSTRIEL DE NOTRE SOCIÉTÉ OU DE TIERCESPARTIES. LA DIVULGATION PUBLIQUE DE CES RENSEIGNEMENTSNUIRAIT À BOMBARDIER INC. OU À DES TIERCES PARTIES. TOUTEINTENTION DE LES DIFFUSER EN TOUT OU EN PARTIE DEVRAÊTRE SIGNIFIÉE À L’AVANCE ET PAR ÉCRIT AU VICE-PRÉSIDENTSERVICES JURIDIQUES , BOMBARDIER AÉRONAUTIQUE.

LES RENSEIGNEMENTS, LES DONNÉES ET DESSINSTECHNIQUES DIVULGUÉS DANS LES PRÉSENTES SONT LAPROPRIÉTÉ EXCLUSIVE DE BOMBARDIER INC. OU COMPORTENTDES DROITS DE PROPRIÉTÉ APPARTENANT À AUTRUI ET NEPEUVENT ÊTRE DIVULGUÉS À QUICONQUE NI UTILISÉS PAR QUIQUE CE SOIT SANS LE CONSENTEMENT ÉCRIT DE BOMBARDIERINC. LE DÉTENTEUR DES PRÉSENTES S’ENGAGE, DANS TOUTESCIRCONSTANCES, À GARDER CONFIDENTIELS LES DONNÉES ETDESSINS TECHNIQUES QU’ELLES CONTIENNENT. CE QUIPRÉCÈDE NE S’APPLIQUE PAS AUX PERSONNES QUI ONT DESDROITS DE PROPRIÉTÉ SUR CES RENSEIGNEMENTS, DONNÉESTECHNIQUES ET DESSINS DANS LA MESURE OÙ CES DROITSEXISTENT.

BOMBARDIER INC., BY ITS GROUPS, DIVISIONS AND/ORCORPORATE SUBSIDIARIES, PROVIDES THIS INFORMATION TOTHE GOVERNMENT IN CONFIDENCE. THIS IS PROPRIETARYCONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WHICH WE CONSIDER EXCLUDEDFROM THE APPLICATION OF THE ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACTAND MAY ALSO BE TRADE SECRET OF OUR COMPANY OR THIRDPARTIES. PUBLIC RELEASE OF THIS INFORMATION WOULD BEHARMFUL TO BOMBARDIER INC. OR THIRD PARTIES. ANYINTENTION TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION, OR PARTTHEREOF, MUST BE INDICATED IN ADVANCE AND IN WRITING TOTHE VICE-PRESIDENT LEGAL SERVICES, BOMBARDIERAEROSPACE.

THE INFORMATION, TECHNICAL DATA AND DESIGNS DISCLOSEDHEREIN ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF BOMBARDIER INC. ORCONTAIN PROPRIETARY RIGHTS OF OTHERS AND ARE NOT TO BEUSED OR DISCLOSED TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENTOF BOMBARDIER INC. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS DOCUMENT, BY ITSRETENTION AND USE AGREES TO HOLD IN CONFIDENCE THETECHNICAL DATA AND DESIGNS CONTAINED HEREIN. THEFOREGOING SHALL NOT APPLY TO PERSONS HAVING PROPRIETARYRIGHTS TO SUCH INFORMATION, TECHNICAL DATA OR SUCH DESIGNSTO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH RIGHTS EXIST. D.3363-25 REV 1998-03

FOR DISCLOSURE TO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT

BT0107-04 MW97 1999-03 © 1999 Bombardier Inc. ® Trademark of Bombardier Inc.

DOCUMENT NO.: RAS-CC670-203

REV: NC

TITLE: FIXED TRAILING EDGESTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Page 3: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:PAGE:

RAS-CC670-203ii

INITIAL APPROVAL

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURALANALYSIS

THE DISCLOSURE AND PROPRIETARY NOTICES ON THE TITLE PAGE APPLY TO THE DATA CONTAINED ON EACH PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT.

BT0107-08 MW97 1999-03

DATE

PREPARED

SHELLEY CLARKE

CHECKED

JOHN HUDDART

APPROVED

SALAMON HARAVAN

Page 4: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-02000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

SECTION 16

OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

Page 5: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC16-i

2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

SECTION TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................... 1-0

TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................ 1-i

LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................1-ii

LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................1-iii

(Last Page of Front Matter) ..........................................................................................1-iii

SECTION 16

OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

16.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 16.1-1

16.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR.................................................. 16.2-1

16.3 MATERIAL PROPERTIES .................................................................... 16.3-1

16.4 LOADS .................................................................................................. 16.4-1

16.5 THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL ........................................................... 16.5-1

16.5.1 F.E.M. FOR THE CLOSED DOOR............................................ 16.5-6

16.5.2 F.E.M FOR THE OPEN DOOR ................................................. 16.5-8

16.6 STRESS ANALYSIS ............................................................................. 16.6-1

16.6.1 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE CLOSED DOORPOSITION WITH A +2.5 PSI LOAD APPLIED .......................... 16.6-2

16.6.2 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE CLOSED DOORPOSITION WITH A –0.8 PSI LOAD APPLIED ........................ 16.6-36

16.6.3 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE OPENEDDOOR POSITION WITH A +2.0 PSI LOAD APPLIED ............ 16.6-69

16.6.4 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE OPENED DOORPOSITION WITH A -.65 PSI LOAD APPLIED ....................... 16.6-102

Page 6: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-ii2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF FIGURES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.2.1 STRUCTURE OF BUTE DOOR .................................................. 16.2-1

FIGURE 16.2.2 SECTION A:A.............................................................................. 16.2-2

FIGURE 16.2.3 A TYPICAL END CROSS-SECTION........................................... 16.2-2

FIGURE 16.2.4 STRUCTURE OF CC670-17325 ................................................. 16.2-3

FIGURE 16.2.5 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17330................................................... 16.2-4

FIGURE 16.2.6 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17334................................................... 16.2-5

FIGURE 16.2.7 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17339................................................... 16.2-6

FIGURE 16.2.8 METAL PLATE ROLLER FITTING .............................................. 16.2-7

FIGURE 16.2.9 ACTUATOR MOVEMENT ........................................................... 16.2-9

FIGURE 16.3.1 MATERIAL PROPERTIES........................................................... 16.3-1

FIGURE 16.5.1 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17325 .......................................................... 16.5-2

FIGURE 16.5.2 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17330 .......................................................... 16.5-3

FIGURE 16.5.3 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17334 .......................................................... 16.5-4

FIGURE 16.5.4 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17339 .......................................................... 16.5-5

FIGURE 16.5.5 CLOSED DOOR F.E.M. AND OPENED DOOR F.E.M............... 16.5-7

FIGURE 16.6.1 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) ........................................ 16.6-2

FIGURE 16.6.2 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.................. 16.6-4

FIGURE 16.6.3 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION.............................. 16.6-5

Page 7: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-iii2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF FIGURES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.4 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ............................................... 16.6-6

FIGURE 16.6.5 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) ...................................... 16.6-10

FIGURE 16.6.6 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION................ 16.6-12

FIGURE 16.6.7 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION........................... 16.6-13

FIGURE 16.6.8 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS .............................................. 16.6-14

FIGURE 16.6.9 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) ...................................... 16.6-19

FIGURE 16.6.10 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-21

FIGURE 16.6.11 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION........................... 16.6-22

FIGURE 16.6.12 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ............................................ 16.6-23

FIGURE 16.6.13 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN.(ULTIMATE) ...................................... 16.6-28

FIGURE 16.6.14 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION............... 16.6-30

FIGURE 16.6.15 NORMATLIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION...................... 16.6-31

FIGURE 16.6.16 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-32

FIGURE 16.6.17 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) .................................... 16.6-36

FIGURE 16.6.18 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION............... 16.6-38

FIGURE 16.6.19 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-39

FIGURE 16.6.20 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-40

FIGURE 16.6.21 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) .................................... 16.6-43

FIGURE 16.6.22 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-45

Page 8: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-iv2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF FIGURES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.23 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-46

FIGURE 16.6.24 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-47

FIGURE 16.6.25 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) .................................... 16.6-52

FIGURE 16.6.26 NORMALIZED STESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION................. 16.6-54

FIGURE 16.6.27 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-55

FIGURE 16.6.28 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-56

FIGURE 16.6.29 DEFLECTION PLOT OF CC670-17339, CLOSED DOOR...... 16.6-61

FIGURE 16.6.30 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-63

FIGURE 16.6.31 NORMALIZED STESS IN FIBER TENSION ........................... 16.6-64

FIGURE 16.6.32 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-65

FIGURE 16.6.33 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) .................................... 16.6-69

FIGURE 16.6.34 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-71

FIGURE 16.6.35 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-72

FIGURE 16.6.36 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-73

FIGURE 16.6.37 DEFLECTION PLOT FOR CC670-17330, OPEN DOOR........ 16.6-76

FIGURE 16.6.38 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-78

FIGURE 16.6.39 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-79

FIGURE 16.6.40 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-80

FIGURE 16.6.41 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE) ................................... 16.6-85

Page 9: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-v2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF FIGURES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.42 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-87

FIGURE 16.6.43 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION........................ 16.6-88

FIGURE 16.6.44 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-89

FIGURE 16.6.45 DEFLECTION PLOT FOR CC670-17339, OPEN DOOR........ 16.6-94

FIGURE 16.6.46 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION.............. 16.6-96

FIGURE 16.6.47 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION......................... 16.6-97

FIGURE 16.6.48 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS ........................................... 16.6-98

Page 10: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-vi2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF TABLES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.1.1 MARGINS OF SAFETY FOR THE BUTE DOOR .......................... 16.1-1

TABLE 16.3.1 FASTENER SHEAR STRENGTH.................................................. 16.3-1

TABLE 16.4.1 LOADS........................................................................................... 16.4-1

TABLE 16.6.1 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325............................ 16.6-8

TABLE 16.6.2 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325....... 16.6-9

TABLE 16.6.3 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330......................... 16.6-16

TABLE 16.6.4 ROLLER FITTING FORCES FOR CC670-17330........................ 16.6-18

TABLE 16.6.5 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334......................... 16.6-25

TABLE 16.6.6 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334.... 16.6-27

TABLE 16.6.7 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339......................... 16.6-34

TABLE 16.6.8 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339.... 16.6-35

TABLE 16.6.9 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325......................... 16.6-42

TABLE 16.6.10 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325.. 16.6-42

TABLE 16.6.11 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330....................... 16.6-49

TABLE 16.6.12 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17330.. 16.6-51

TABLE 16.6.13 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334....................... 16.6-58

TABLE 16.6.14 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334.. 16.6-60

TABLE 16.6.15 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339....................... 16.6-67

Page 11: Composite Stress Analysis

DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16-vii2000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section 16: OUTBOARD TRAILING EDGE BUTE DOOR, COMPOSITE PANELS

LIST OF TABLES

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.16 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339.. 16.6-68

TABLE 16.6.17 ACTUATOR SPC....................................................................... 16.6-68

TABLE 16.6.18 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325........................ 16.6-75

TABLE 16.6.19 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325.. 16.6-75

TABLE 16.6.20 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330........................ 16.6-82

TABLE 16.6.21 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17330... 16.6-84

TABLE 16.6.22 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334....................... 16.6-91

TABLE 16.6.23 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334.. 16.6-93

TABLE 16.6.24 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339..................... 16.6-100

TABLE 16.6.25 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339 16.6-101

TABLE 16.6.26 ACTUATOR SPC FORCS ....................................................... 16.6-101

Page 12: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.1-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.1: INTRODUCTION

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.1 INTRODUCTION

The bute door is a fixed trailig edge structure composed of 4composite parts. These composite parts correspond to drawingnumbers CC670-17325, CC670-17330, CC670-17334, CC670-17339.

A stress analysis was carried out on all 4 composite parts of the butedoor using NASTRAN finte element analysis. PATRAN was usedfor the post processing and also to generate the model from theCATIA model. The margins of safety are shown in Table 16.1.1.

TABLE 16.1.1 MARGINS OF SAFETY FOR THE BUTE DOOR

MARGINS OF SAFETY FOR FAIRINGS

BEARINGLOADCASE

BUTEDOOR

SECTION

FIBRETENSION

FIBRECOMPRESSION

MATRIX

HINGE ROLLER

CC670-17325 4.83 14.4 11.6 64.7 HIGH

CC670-17330 5.5 16.4 13.3 82.7 HIGH

CC670-17334 7.4 20.0 16.7 15.6 HIGH

CLOSEDDOOR

WITH A2.5 PSILOAD CC670-17339 11.4 32.8 27.08 89.7 HIGH

CC670-17325 7.3 16.7 11.1 31.8 43.5

CC670-17330 2.6 10.2 7.4 34.07 41.6

CC670-17334 4.7 12.2 8.9 29.5 29.9

CLOSEDDOOR

WITH A–0.8 PSILOAD CC670-17339 4.6 16.4 11.9 29.9 42.0

CC670-17325 1.6 8.8 3.9 11.4 25.9CC670-17330 .81 4.3 2.4 12.9 15.3CC670-17334 .98 5.9 3.2 9.4 15.2

OPENEDDOOR

WITH A+2.0 PSILOAD

CC670-17339 1.7 7.4 4.2 10.1 15.5

Page 13: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

The bute door consists of 4 sections made of graphite fabric and a(¼)-inch thick honeycomb core, Fig.16.2.1. Moving from the mostinboard section to the outboard section of the door, the width taperesfrom 3.65 inches to 2.5 inches.

FIGURE 16.2.1 STRUCTURE OF BUTE DOOR

BUTE DOOR HINGE LINE

ROLLER ASSEMBLY

3.65 in.2.5 in.

Page 14: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-22000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The basic lay-up is the same for all sections of the door, Fig.16.2.2.To support the roller fittings the ends of each section are thicker thanthe main part of the door. A typical cross section of an end is shownin Fig.16.2.3.

FIGURE 16.2.2 SECTION A:A

FIGURE 16.2.3 A TYPICAL END CROSS-SECTION

0.427 [45/-45/0/-45/45/film/core/film/45/-45/0/-45/45]

0.116 [45/0/-45/-45/0/-45/45] .116

.3154 in.0.427 in.

Page 15: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-32000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The individual sections are presented in Fig.16.2.4, Fig.16.2.5,Fig.16.2.6 and Fig.16.2.7. Drawing number CC670-17325 is themost inboard section of the bute door and is located between wingstations 163.0 to 175.22, Fig.16.2.4. It is approximately 17.4 inchesin length.The width tapers from 3.65 inches to approximately 3.5inches wide.

FIGURE 16.2.4 STRUCTURE OF CC670-17325

A

A

3.65 in.

3.57 in.

Element4026

Element4024

Element4027

Element4025

Element3701

Element3699

Element3700

Element3698

Page 16: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-42000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

Section CC670-17330 of the bute door is located between wingstations 180.9 to 217.54, Fig.16.2.5. This section is approximately43.63 inches in length. The width tapers from 3.5 inches to 3.16inches.

FIGURE 16.2.5 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17330

A

A

3.5 in.

3.16 in.

Element3697

Element3695

Element 3696

Element 3694

Element 3693

Element 3691

Element 3692

Element 3690

Page 17: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-52000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

Section CC670-17334 of the bute door is located between wingstations 222.46 and 260.90, Fig.16.2.6. It is approximately 45.6inches in length. The width tapers from 3.1 inches to 2.7 incheswide.

FIGURE 16.2.6 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17334

A

A

3.1 in.

2.7 in.

Element3688

Element3687

Element3686

Element3689

Element3685

Element3683

Element3682

Element3684

Page 18: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-62000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

Section CC670-17339 of the bute door, is located between wingstations 267.36 and 285.25, Fig.16.2.7. It is approximately 16.95inches in length. The width tapers from 2.7 to 2.56 inches wide.

FIGURE 16.2.7 GEOMETRY OF CC670-17339

A

A

2.7 in.

2.56 in.

Element3679

Element3681

Element3680

Element3678

Element4050

Element4048

Element4051

Element4049

Page 19: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-72000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The 4 sections are joined together via roller fittings, which are metalplates to which rollers are fitted. Rollers were placed in 3 differentlocations where the composite sections join and at 2 ends. Theserollers are the contact points between the flaps and the bute door. Oneview of a connecting roller fitting is shown in Fig.16.2.8. Thesefittings are fastened to the upper surface of the doors at each of theirends using 4, 3/16 inch bolts type NAS 1580. The bute door isfastened to the lower wing shroud along its forward edges via metalpiano hinges, using B0205015 type fasteners, which are reduced headrivets.

FIGURE 16.2.8 METAL PLATE ROLLER FITTING

ROLLER FITTING

Page 20: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-82000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The purpose of the bute door is to provide a smooth air flow from theunderneath of the shroud to the underneath of the flaps. The doorassumes two positions. The close door position that occurs when theflaps are retracted which causes the gap between the flaps and theshroud to close. The open door position occurs when the flaps aredeployed and the bute door is automatically pushed open via 3actuator rods. These rods are located at wing stations 178.0, 220.0and 264.0. The door is opened through an angle of approximately15.0°, Fig.16.2.9.

Page 21: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.2-92000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.2: DESCRIPTION OF THE BUTE DOOR

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.2.9 ACTUATOR MOVEMENT

VIEW LOOKING INBDAT WING STATION 220.0

41.60

Page 22: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.3-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.3: MATERIAL PROPERTIES

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.3 MATERIAL PROPERTIES

The material properties and the material allowables for the 8-harnesssatin weave graphite/epoxy fabric are taken from RAS-000-357 andpresented in Table 16.3.1. The allowables correspond to averageroom temperature values for impact damaged (1mm dent) material.

FIGURE 16.3.1 MATERIAL PROPERTIES

PROPERTIESGRAPHITE / EPOXY

FABRIC

Elastic Modulus, E11 8.31 msi

Elastic Modulus, E22 8.17 msi

Shear Modulus, G12 0.61 msi

Poisson’s Ratio, ν12 0.047

Ply Thickness, in. 0.0166

Tensile Strength σ1t = σ2t = 80 ksiCompressive Strength σ1c = σ2c = 42 ksi

In-Plane Shear Strength τ12 = 17 ksiShort Beam Shear Strength sbs = 11.3 ksi

Matrix Tensile Strain εt = 9000 x 10-6

Matrix Compressive Strain εc = 24000 x 10-6

TABLE 16.3.1 FASTENER SHEAR STRENGTH

FASTENERTYPE

DIAMETER MINIMUMSHEARLOAD(LBS)

B0205015 1/8 724

NAS1580 3/16 2623

Page 23: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.4-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.4: LOADS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.4 LOADS

There are 4 load cases applied to the door that are found in reportnumber MAU-BA670-113. Table 16.4.1 shows the different loadcases applied to the door. The pressure is constant over the wholedoor.

TABLE 16.4.1 LOADS

FLAP POSITION DOORPOSITION

LIMIT PRESSURE(PSI)*

Retracted Closed +2.5

Retracted Closed -0.8

Deployed Opened +2.0

Deployed Opened -0.65

* Positive pressure closes the door.

Page 24: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.5 THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Each structure, including its constraints, was modeled as accuratelyas possible within practical limitations. The typical element size is0.50 inch square. The F.E.M. for each section consists of shellelements, CQUAD4 and CTRIA3. There are 3742 elements in themodel. Element properties were defined using PCOMP propertycards and the material properties of individual plies were definedusing MAT8 cards. The material coordinate system is defined withthe x axis(0° direction) parallel to the trailing edge. Note thatelements of the same color have the same property card.

The F.E.M. of all sections are shown in Fig.16.5.1 to Fig.16.5.4. Thebasic lay-up of all sections is the same and is [45/-45/0/-45/45/film/core/film/45/-45/0/-45/45], Fig.16.2.2. The lay-up of theborders is [45/0/-45/-45/0/-45/45], Fig.16.2.3. The ends of eachsection are thickened to support the metal roller fitting plates. Thehoneycomb core is not structurally required, therefore it is left out ofthe model, and only the outer skins surrounding the honeycomb coreis modeled.

The metal roller fitting plates are included in the model and aremodeled with CQUAD4 and CTRIA3 elements. Element propertiesare defined using PSHELL property cards and the material propertiesare defined using MAT1 cards. CBAR elements represent the 4fasteners at each end of each composite section. These bar elementsare used because of the offset that exists between the composite doorsections and the metal plates that are created in the model. Elementproperties for these simple bar elements were defined using PBARproperty cards in NASTRAN.

Page 25: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-22000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

In the opened and closed door model nodes coincident with the pianohinge are constrained in 5 degrees of freedom, Tx, Ty, Tz, Ry andRz.

FIGURE 16.5.1 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17325

Honeycomb

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45]Node 4526

Node4542Total number of elements = 589

Page 26: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-32000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.5.2 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17330

[45/-45/0/-45/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/-45/0/45]

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/45/0/45/45/-45/-45/45]

Node 5007

Node4927

Total number of elements = 1361

Page 27: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-42000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.5.3 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17334

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/-45/0/-45/45]

Node 5016

Node 5098

Total number of elements = 1136

Page 28: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-52000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.5.4 F.E.M. FOR CC670-17339

[45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45] [45/0/-45/0/45/0/45/0/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45]

[45/0/-45/45/0/45/-45/0/-45/45]

Node 5108

Node 5142

Total number of elements = 421

Page 29: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-62000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.5.1 F.E.M. FOR THE CLOSED DOOR

Two load cases are applied to the bute door in the closed doorposition. To keep the door closed, two different models areproduced. The pressure of +2.5 psi applied to the door, pushes thedoor up against the flaps. To represent this, single point constraintsare placed along the trailing edge of the bute door and constrained inthe vertical, Tz, direction of coordinate 5 . Single point constraintsrepresent the rollers that are placed in the 3 different locations wherethe composite sections are joined and at the 2 ends, Fig.16.5.5. Nodesthat coincide with the 5 rollers are are constrained in the vertical, Tz,direction of coordinate 5. The actuator rod is not included in thismodel.

The suction of -0.8 psi applied to the closed door, pushes the doordown against 3 actuator rods. The air loads are reacted by the hingeloads and the actuator rod. These actuator rods prevent the doorfrom opening. CROD elements are used to model these rods; theirproperties are defined using PROD property cards. The actuator rodsare constrained at their ends in all 6 degrees of freedom Tx, Ty, Tz,Rx, Ry, and Rz. The angle between the actuator rod in the closeddoor position and the open door position is 15.0°, Fig.16.5.5. Insteadof rotating the door 15.0°, the actuator rods are rotated. The 3actuator rods are connected to the door via CTRIA3 elements.Element properties for these elements are defined using PSHELLproperty cards and the material properties are defined using MAT1cards

Page 30: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-72000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.5.5 CLOSED DOOR F.E.M. AND OPENED DOOR F.E.M.

HINGE LINE

CLOSED DOORACTUATORPOSITION

OPENED DOORACTUATORPOSITON

Actuator 1

Actuator 2

Actuator 3

Page 31: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.5-82000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.5: THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.5.2 F.E.M FOR THE OPEN DOOR

In the open door position the 3 actuator rods are engaged for both the+2.0 psi load and the -.65 psi load. In the open door position the airloads are reacted also by the hinge loads and the actuator rod. Theseactuator rods prevent the door from closing. CROD elements areused to model these rods, Fig.16.5.1.1; their properties are definedusing PROD property cards. The actuator rods are constrained attheir ends in all 6 degrees of freedom Tx, Ty, Tz, Rx, Ry, and Rz.The actuator rods are connected to the door via CTRIA3 elements.Element properties for these elements are defined using PSHELLproperty cards and the material properties are defined using MAT1cards

Page 32: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-12000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.6 STRESS ANALYSIS

A linear static analysis (SOL 101) was carried out under ultimateload conditions for the whole bute door comprising of sectionsCC670-17325, CC670-17330, CC670-17334 and CC670-17339. Theanalyses of the door are presented below. To obtain ultimate loadconditions, a factor of 1.5 is multiplied to the Limit Load Case givenin the load section of this report.

The ply stresses are analyzed using the Canadair Failure Criteria(RAS-000-357). This criterion calculates values of the normalizedstress (NS) using the allowables for impact damaged material. Themargin of safety is given by:

MS = (1/NS) – 1

The value of NS should be increased by 10% to obtain B allowablesand 30% to obtain hot/wet allowables (if applicable). Note this is notrequired for tensile values.

Note, both the upper and lower surfaces are shown in all plots exceptwhere otherwise indicated.

Page 33: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-22000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.6.1 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE CLOSED DOORPOSITION WITH A +2.5 PSI LOAD APPLIED

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17325 is shown in Fig.16.6.1. The maximum deflection is.00720 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.1 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 34: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-32000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.2, Fig.16.6.3 and Fig.16.6.4respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.120. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.120 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 4.83.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0589. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0589 x 1.1)) - 1 = 14.4.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0556. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0556 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 11.6.

Page 35: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-42000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.2 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 36: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-52000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.3 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 37: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-62000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.4 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 38: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-72000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 4542 and 4543 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 29.3 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.1.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 20.5 + 8.8 ) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

=1412.0 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 1412.0) – 1 = 49.9 High margin of safety.

ROLLER FITTING

The maximum shear load acting on the CBAR, element 3698 is :

Shear load = ( 7.32 + 7.52)1/2 = 10.5 lbs, Table 16.6.2.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 and the bolt diameter is3/16.

σbr = ( 10.5) lbs/ (0.3154 x 0.1875) = 177.6 lbs/in2

MS = (72000/ 177.6) – 1 = 404.4 High margin of safety.

Page 39: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-82000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.1 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325

Node RESULTANT 4542 2.04758E+01 4543 8.79599E+00 4544 6.38464E+00 4545 4.67269E+00 4546 4.84687E+00 4547 4.84847E+00 4548 4.27148E+00 4549 3.97896E+00 4550 3.91169E+00 4551 3.75858E+00 4552 3.75574E+00 4553 3.64309E+00 4554 3.67512E+00 4555 3.54697E+00 4556 3.55282E+00 4557 3.56123E+00 4558 3.29440E+00 4559 3.42908E+00 4560 3.42758E+00 4561 3.58946E+00 4562 3.71924E+00 4563 3.65306E+00 4564 3.42062E+00 4565 3.43282E+00 4566 4.09864E+00 4521 4.32642E+00 4522 4.89698E+00 4523 3.85495E+00 4524 3.58947E+00 4525 3.28135E+00

4526 2.55333E+00

Page 40: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-92000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.2 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325ELEM. POS. Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3698 0 -8.71640E+00 -7.34161E+00 7.54239E+003699 0 2.32218E+00 -6.25685E+00 1.41205E+013700 0 5.70498E+00 -4.84099E+00 -8.28637E+003701 0 -9.76427E+00 -1.40868E+01 4.04009E+004024 0 1.11008E+01 1.56213E-01 -1.32491E+014025 0 -3.05445E+01 1.39592E+01 8.35232E+004026 0 5.65767E+00 -6.60980E+00 -1.85058E+004027 0 -1.28315E+01 -7.36100E+00 7.40206E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.4 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 41: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-102000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17330 is shown in Fig.16.6.5. The maximum deflection is.00725 inches which occurs on the lower surface.

FIGURE 16.6.5 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Lower surface

Page 42: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-112000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix is shown in Fig.16.6.6, Fig.16.6.7 and Fig.16.6.8respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.107. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.107 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 5.5.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0522. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0522 x 1.1)) - 1 = 16.4.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0489. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0489 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 13.3.

Page 43: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-122000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.6 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 44: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-132000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.7 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 45: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-142000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.8 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 46: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-152000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTINGThe node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represent 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5006 and 5007 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 29.2 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.3.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 19.9 + 9.3) lbs/ (0.125 x .166)

= 29.2 / (.021) = 1407.2 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 1407.2) – 1 = 50.16 High margin of safety

ROLLER FITTINGS

The maximum shear load acting on the CBAR, element 3695 is :

Shear load =(23.72 +.0582)1/2 = 23.7lbs, Table 16.6.4.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 and the bolt size is 3/16.

σbr = ( 23.7) lbs/ (0.3154 x .1875) = 400.7 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 400.7) – 1 = 178.7 High margin of safety.

Page 47: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-162000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.3 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330

Node RESULTANT 4927 0 8.10981E+00 4928 0 8.97899E+00 4929 0 9.79793E+00 4930 0 9.38071E+00

4813 0 5.03958E+00 4932 0 4.03098E+00 4933 0 6.17470E+00 4934 0 6.12427E+00 4935 0 5.57526E+00 4936 0 4.90018E+00 4937 0 4.28469E+00 4938 0 3.85868E+00 4939 0 3.53824E+00 4940 0 3.39109E+00 4941 0 3.44783E+00 4942 0 3.31503E+00 4943 0 3.34931E+00 4944 0 3.56775E+00 4945 0 3.26592E+00 4946 0 3.55208E+00 4947 0 3.34995E+00 4948 0 3.39702E+00 4949 0 3.47004E+00 4950 0 3.48855E+00 4951 0 3.35250E+00 4952 0 3.35477E+00 4953 0 3.55975E+00 4954 0 3.23055E+00 4955 0 3.50276E+00 4956 0 3.30612E+00 4957 0 3.32195E+00 4958 0 3.51006E+00 4959 0 3.20249E+00 4960 0 3.39157E+00 4961 0 3.41014E+00 4962 0 3.25963E+00 4963 0 3.29431E+00 4964 0 3.43459E+00 4965 0 3.24863E+00

4986 0 3.26898E+00 4966 0 3.47212E+00 4967 0 3.14760E+00

Page 48: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-172000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

NODE POS RESULTANT4968 0 3.34752E+004969 0 3.37028E+00

4970 0 3.21799E+00 4971 0 3.31656E+00 4972 0 3.24944E+00 4973 0 3.28848E+00 4974 0 3.23358E+00 4975 0 3.41510E+00 4976 0 3.12169E+00 4977 0 3.35094E+00 4978 0 3.25245E+00 4979 0 3.18149E+00 4980 0 3.40666E+00 4981 0 3.10370E+00 4982 0 3.33834E+00

4985 0 3.23972E+00 4983 0 3.22322E+00 4984 0 3.22425E+00 4987 0 3.30178E+00 4988 0 3.32487E+00 4989 0 3.19241E+00 4990 0 3.33899E+00 4991 0 3.17995E+00 4992 0 3.33427E+00 4993 0 3.36012E+00 4994 0 3.24626E+00 4995 0 3.34682E+00 4996 0 3.33668E+00 4997 0 3.28720E+00 4998 0 3.43479E+00 4999 0 3.46230E+00 5000 0 3.32241E+00 5001 0 3.59526E+00 5002 0 3.57501E+00 5003 0 3.93728E+00 5004 0 3.93299E+00 5005 0 6.97634E+00 5006 0 9.26731E+00 5007 0 1.99852E+01

Page 49: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-182000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.4 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17330ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3690 0 -1.33634E+01 -1.29986E+01 -8.20521E-02

3691 0 1.42843E+01 -6.02832E+00 6.65764E+00 3692 0 -4.24503E-01 -6.68639E+00 -1.91977E+00 3693 0 -6.31540E+00 -1.23852E+00 4.99399E+00 3694 0 4.24961E+00 5.03789E+00 -1.97402E+01 3695 0 -1.35883E+01 2.37278E+01 5.77958E-02 3696 0 1.51393E+01 -1.45102E+01 -5.65971E+00 3697 0 -1.64322E+01 1.84553E+01 8.41802E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.5 for the location of the CBAR elements.

.

Page 50: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-192000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17334 is shown in Fig.16.6.9. The maximum deflection is.00506 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.9 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 51: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-202000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.10, Fig.16.6.11 and Fig.16.6.12respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.0834. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.0834 x 1.1 x1.3 )) - 1 = 7.4

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0432. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0432 x 1.1)) - 1 = 20.0.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0396. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0396 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 16.7.

Page 52: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-212000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.10 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 53: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-222000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.11 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 54: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-232000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.12 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 55: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-242000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represent 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5098 and 5101 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 93.9 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.5.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 19.2 + 74.7) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 93.9 / (.125 x 0.166) = 4525.3 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 4525.3) – 1 = 14.9

ROLLER FITTINGS

The maximum shear load acting through CBAR , element 3687 is:

Shear load = (27.42 + 2.82)1/2 = 27.5 , Table 16.6.6.

The door thickness in this region is .2988 inches and the bolt size is3/16 inches.

σbr = ( 27.5) lbs/ (0.2988 x 0.1875) = 488.9 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 488.9) – 1 = 146.3 High margin of safety.

Page 56: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-252000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.5 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334

NODE RESULTANT5016 0 5.97591E+005017 0 4.58662E+005018 0 4.65677E+005019 0 5.16304E+00

5020 0 5.03249E+005021 0 5.75005E+005022 0 3.49219E+00

5023 0 3.35068E+00 5024 0 3.62010E+00 5025 0 3.84987E+00 5026 0 3.64036E+00 5027 0 3.42788E+00 5028 0 3.06672E+00 5029 0 3.01835E+00 5030 0 3.00203E+00 5031 0 2.91870E+00 5032 0 2.99350E+00 5033 0 3.02165E+00 5034 0 3.08445E+00 5035 0 2.98821E+00 5036 0 3.01506E+00 5037 0 3.07443E+00 5038 0 3.12831E+00 5039 0 2.93474E+00 5040 0 3.06357E+00 5041 0 3.03296E+00 5042 0 3.04318E+00 5043 0 3.01813E+00 5044 0 2.98783E+00 5045 0 3.04995E+00 5046 0 2.94411E+00 5047 0 2.99188E+00 5048 0 2.95146E+00 5049 0 3.07837E+00 5050 0 2.86646E+00 5051 0 2.99146E+00 5052 0 2.96426E+00 5053 0 3.03431E+00 5054 0 2.85054E+00 5055 0 2.97380E+00 5056 0 2.94615E+00

Page 57: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-262000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

NODE RESULTANT5057 0 2.98786E+00

5058 0 2.88468E+00 5059 0 2.93571E+00 5060 0 2.89907E+00 5061 0 3.02380E+00

5062 0 2.84437E+005063 0 2.88777E+005064 0 3.01051E+00

5065 0 2.80001E+00 5066 0 2.92515E+00 5067 0 2.89697E+00

5068 0 2.93896E+00 5069 0 2.83922E+00

5070 0 2.85891E+00 5071 0 2.93811E+00 5072 0 2.89829E+00 5073 0 2.82170E+00 5074 0 2.84075E+00 5075 0 2.95911E+00 5076 0 2.78663E+00 5077 0 2.82552E+00 5078 0 2.88479E+00 5079 0 2.87837E+00 5080 0 2.76355E+00 5081 0 2.85518E+00 5082 0 2.82854E+00 5083 0 2.86720E+00 5084 0 2.76126E+00 5085 0 2.77753E+00 5086 0 2.88659E+00 5087 0 2.70828E+00 5088 0 2.77089E+00 5089 0 2.73068E+00 5090 0 2.82961E+00 5091 0 2.64624E+00 5092 0 2.37610E+00 5093 0 4.05418E+00 5094 0 3.59746E+00 5095 0 3.82531E+00 5096 0 4.21828E+00 5097 0 4.96574E+00 5101 0 7.47125E+00

5098 0 1.91578E+01

Page 58: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-272000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.6 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3682 0 -1.02539E+01 1.15849E+01 5.24136E+00

3683 0 7.71806E+00 3.41037E+00 7.02922E+00 3684 0 -1.77333E+00 3.79416E+00 -8.04029E-01 3685 0 -2.82133E+00 -1.41793E-01 4.13568E-01 3686 0 9.13103E+00 1.56591E+01 -1.52567E+01 3687 0 -2.07130E+01 2.73958E+01 -2.77001E+00 3688 0 1.03527E+00 -1.02607E+00 -1.72261E+00 3689 0 2.87131E+00 -1.49176E+01 1.04526E+01

Refer to Fig.16.2.6 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 59: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-282000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670-17339 is shown in Fig.16.6.13. The maximum deflection is.00304 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.13 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN.(ULTIMATE)

Page 60: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-292000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.14, Fig.16.6.15 and Fig.16.6.16respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is .0563. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.0563 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 11.4.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0269. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0269 x 1.1)) - 1 = 32.8.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0249. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0249 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 27.08.

Page 61: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-302000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.14 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 62: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-312000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.15 NORMATLIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 63: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-322000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.16 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 64: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-332000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5109 and 5108 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 20.36 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.7.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 10.86 + 9.5) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 20.36 / (.125 x 0.166) = 981.2 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 981.2) – 1 = 72.4 High margin of safety.

ROLLER FITTINGS

The maximum shear load acting through CBAR, element 3679 is:

Shear load = (19.32 + 3.982 )1/2 = 19.7 lbs, Table 16.6.8.

The door thickness is .282 inches and the bolt diameter is .1875.

σbr = ( 19.7) lbs/ (0.282 x 0.1875)= 372.6 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 372.6) – 1 = 192.2 High margin of safety.

Page 65: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-342000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.7 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339

Node RESULTANT 5108 0 9.45634E+00 5109 0 1.08641E+01 5110 0 6.40591E+00 5111 0 3.82483E+00 5112 0 4.63057E+00 5113 0 4.03005E+00 5114 0 4.48895E+00 5115 0 3.86592E+00

5116 0 3.27904E+005117 0 2.87430E+005118 0 2.62072E+00

5119 0 2.56165E+00 5120 0 2.62374E+00

5121 0 2.72495E+00 5122 0 2.71084E+00 5123 0 2.65442E+00 5124 0 2.68879E+00 5125 0 2.76843E+00 5126 0 2.68568E+00 5127 0 2.58624E+00 5128 0 2.58027E+00 5129 0 2.53254E+00 5130 0 2.31349E+00 5131 0 2.38735E+00 5132 0 2.37079E+00 5133 0 2.59045E+00 5134 0 2.57505E+00 5135 0 2.35424E+00 5136 0 2.66556E+00 5137 0 2.83625E+00 5138 0 2.65652E+00 5139 0 2.49519E+00 5140 0 2.36763E+00 5141 0 2.11429E+00 5142 0 2.81559E+00

Page 66: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-352000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.8 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339Ele. Pos Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)

3678 0 2.94156E+00 -4.93356E+00 -1.27451E+01 3679 0 -4.30319E+00 -1.93418E+01 3.98214E+00 3680 0 1.18931E+01 1.31760E+01 -8.29909E+00 3681 0 -1.22824E+01 -7.66640E+00 5.39945E+00 4048 0 -1.18444E+01 1.26034E+01 -3.96881E-01 4049 0 3.46473E+00 2.97307E+00 -5.03036E+00 4050 0 -1.62217E+01 -9.05922E+00 9.47742E+00 4051 0 4.41298E+00 -6.28905E+00 -3.56345E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.7 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 67: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-362000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.6.2 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE CLOSED DOORPOSITION WITH A –0.8 PSI LOAD APPLIED

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17325 is shown in Fig.16.6.17. The maximum deflection is-0.0775 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.17 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 68: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-372000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.18, Fig.16.6.19 and Fig.16.6.20respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.0840. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.0840 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 7.3.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0506. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0506 x 1.1)) - 1 = 16.7.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0578. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0578 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 11.1.

Page 69: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-382000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.18 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBERCOMPRESSION

Page 70: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-392000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.19 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 71: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-402000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.20 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 72: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-412000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 4542 and 4543 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 47.8 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.9.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 37.1 + 10.7) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 47.8 / (.125 x 0.166) = 2303.6 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 2303.6) – 1 = 30.25

ROLLER FITTINGS

The maximum shear load acting through CBAR, element 3701 is:

Shear load = (97.82 + 4.02)1/2 = 97.9 lbs, Table 16.6.10.

The door thickness is .3154 and the bolt size is .1875.

σbr = ( 97.9) lbs/ (0.3154 x 0.1875) = 1655.2 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 1655.2) – 1 = 42.5 High margin of safety.

Page 73: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-422000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.9 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325

Node POS RESULTANT

4542 0 3.70670E+01 4543 0 1.07243E+01 4544 0 1.36279E+01 4545 0 1.17448E+01 4546 0 1.07002E+01 4547 0 8.66673E+00 4548 0 7.52017E+00 4549 0 6.63136E+00 4550 0 6.17583E+00 4551 0 5.72226E+00 4552 0 5.53271E+00 4553 0 5.25351E+00 4554 0 5.20676E+00 4555 0 4.96343E+00 4556 0 4.82258E+00 4557 0 4.85873E+00 4558 0 4.42064E+00 4559 0 4.29219E+00 4560 0 4.07496E+00 4561 0 3.99390E+00 4562 0 3.87602E+00 4563 0 4.16003E+00 4564 0 4.72133E+00 4565 0 5.15811E+00 4566 0 6.16862E+00 4521 0 6.10366E+00 4522 0 4.91814E+00 4523 0 4.08138E+00 4524 0 8.88586E+00 4525 0 1.21518E+01 4526 0 6.99757E+00

TABLE 16.6.10 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325

ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3698 0 -2.66351E+01 -9.29973E+00 -3.04318E+01

3699 0 3.17064E+01 2.46260E+01 -5.44425E+01 3700 0 -1.74517E+01 5.60003E+01 2.70453E+01 3701 0 5.10074E+01 9.77841E+01 4.01655E+00 4024 0 6.79915E+00 -6.16888E+00 -4.78873E-01 4025 0 -6.62562E+00 2.86479E+00 -6.74607E-01 4026 0 -4.67578E+00 -6.60813E-01 4.20645E+00 4027 0 4.48169E+00 3.95811E+00 -3.05094E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.4 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 74: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-432000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17330 is shown in Fig.16.6.21. The maximum deflection is.00774 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.21 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 75: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-442000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.22, Fig.16.6.23 and Fig.16.6.24respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.192. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.192 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 2.6.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0809. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0809 x 1.1)) - 1 = 10.23.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0830. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0830 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 7.4.

Page 76: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-452000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.22 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 77: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-462000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.23 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 78: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-472000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.24 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 79: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-482000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5006 and 5007 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 44.65 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.11.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 37.7 + 6.95) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 44.65 / (.125 x 0.166) = 2151.8 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 2151.8) – 1 = 32.5

The maximum shear load acting through CBAR , element 3696 is:

Shear load= ( 69.92 + 74.32)1/2 = 102.0, Table 16.6.12.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 and the bolt diameter is.1875.

σbr = (102)/(.1875 x .315) = 1726.9 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 1726.9) – 1 = 41.7 High margin of safety.

Page 80: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-492000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.11 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330

Node Pos RESULTANT 4927 0 6.24630E+00 4928 0 1.04327E+01 4929 0 1.98318E+01

4813 0 2.69442E+014930 0 2.80498E+01

4932 0 2.30230E+01 4933 0 1.55176E+01 4934 0 1.20504E+01 4935 0 8.74618E+00 4936 0 6.41619E+00 4937 0 4.73894E+00 4938 0 3.54350E+00 4939 0 2.67095E+00 4940 0 1.98976E+00 4941 0 1.85992E+00 4942 0 1.44788E+00 4943 0 1.47481E+00 4944 0 2.12439E+00 4945 0 1.42495E+00 4946 0 2.29276E+00 4947 0 1.67983E+00 4948 0 1.98022E+00 4949 0 2.24099E+00 4950 0 2.35999E+00 4951 0 1.89947E+00 4952 0 1.94229E+00 4953 0 2.77451E+00 4954 0 1.54216E+00 4955 0 2.66440E+00 4956 0 1.83262E+00 4957 0 1.96286E+00 4958 0 2.72473E+00 4959 0 1.51404E+00 4960 0 2.29594E+00 4961 0 2.41095E+00 4962 0 1.87304E+00 4963 0 1.99488E+00 4964 0 2.62426E+00 4965 0 1.83021E+00

4986 0 1.99126E+00 4966 0 2.87227E+00 4967 0 1.58004E+00 4968 0 2.39327E+00

Page 81: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-502000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

NODE POS RESULTANT4969 0 2.46160E+00

4970 0 1.81322E+004971 0 2.28329E+004972 0 2.03564E+00

4973 0 2.19874E+00 4974 0 2.04913E+00 4975 0 2.84602E+00 4976 0 1.63834E+00 4977 0 2.64512E+00 4978 0 2.21189E+00 4979 0 2.05628E+00 4980 0 2.95539E+00 4981 0 1.85781E+00 4982 0 2.77673E+00

4985 0 2.35332E+004983 0 2.37451E+00

4984 0 2.49565E+00 4987 0 2.82928E+00 4988 0 2.77553E+00 4989 0 2.22365E+00 4990 0 2.79241E+00 4991 0 2.15786E+00 4992 0 2.66136E+00 4993 0 2.62313E+00 4994 0 2.03709E+00 4995 0 2.64600E+00 4996 0 2.88174E+00 4997 0 2.64032E+00 4998 0 4.07307E+00 4999 0 4.82762E+00 5000 0 4.75687E+00 5001 0 6.16114E+00 5002 0 5.47364E+00 5003 0 5.05811E+00 5004 0 6.02904E+00 5005 0 1.09014E+01 5006 0 6.94833E+00 5007 0 3.77080E+01

Page 82: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-512000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.12 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17330ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3690 0 -2.34843E+01 -1.31742E+01 -3.19780E+01

3691 0 1.35260E+01 -6.19723E+00 -6.65797E+01 3692 0 -2.81584E+01 5.16409E+01 5.31364E+01 3693 0 6.96633E+01 3.63737E+01 4.53766E+01 3694 0 -2.24327E+01 -4.82305E+01 6.91192E+01 3695 0 8.32412E+01 -2.94499E+01 5.70862E+01 3696 0 4.13424E+00 -6.98793E+01 -7.43075E+01 3697 0 1.78906E+01 -2.08475E+01 -6.34921E+01

Refer to Fig.16.2.5 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 83: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-522000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17334 is shown in Fig.16.6.2.9. The maximum deflection is-.102 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.25 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 84: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-532000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.26, Fig.16.6.27 and Fig.16.6.28respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.122. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.122 x 1.1 x1.3 )) - 1 = 4.73.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0687. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.687 x 1.1)) - 1 = 12.2.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0708. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0708 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 8.9.

Page 85: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-542000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.26 NORMALIZED STESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 86: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-552000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.27 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 87: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-562000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.28 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 88: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-572000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5016 and 5017 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 51.3 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.13.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .116 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 24.7 + 26.6) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.116)

= 51.3 / (.1875 x 0.116) = 3537.9 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 3537.9) – 1 = 19.4

The maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3685 is;

Shear load = (89.02 + 85.52)1/2 = 123.4 lbs, Table 16.6.14.

The door thickness in this region is .2822 inches and the boltdiameter is 3/16 inches.

σbr = 123.4 lbs/ (.2822 x .1875) = 2324.6 lbs/in2.

MS = (72000/ 2324.6) – 1 = 29.9. High margin of safety.

Page 89: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-582000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.13 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334

Node Pos RESULTANT 5016 0 2.47891E+01 5017 0 2.66004E+01 5018 0 2.39609E+01 5019 0 1.56408E+01 5020 0 9.56876E+00 5021 0 5.71761E+00 5022 0 2.61710E+00 5023 0 3.00601E+00 5024 0 4.25342E+00 5025 0 2.66237E+00 5026 0 2.40992E+00 5027 0 2.36497E+00 5028 0 2.51247E+00 5029 0 2.70502E+00 5030 0 2.99305E+00 5031 0 2.91564E+00 5032 0 3.15399E+00 5033 0 3.22393E+00 5034 0 3.26358E+00 5035 0 2.64419E+00 5036 0 2.58629E+00 5037 0 2.67100E+00 5038 0 2.73442E+00 5039 0 1.63024E+00 5040 0 2.18434E+00 5041 0 2.06771E+00 5042 0 2.15192E+00 5043 0 1.90103E+00 5044 0 1.75692E+00 5045 0 2.20896E+00 5046 0 1.58658E+00 5047 0 1.85860E+00 5048 0 1.69705E+00 5049 0 2.52739E+00 5050 0 1.29748E+00 5051 0 2.00845E+00 5052 0 1.83745E+00 5053 0 2.34492E+00 5054 0 1.28290E+00 5055 0 2.00636E+00 5056 0 1.82659E+00 5057 0 2.18237E+00 5058 0 1.54937E+00

Page 90: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-592000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

NODE POS RESULTANT5059 0 1.83559E+005060 0 1.64633E+005061 0 2.58186E+00

5062 0 1.38187E+00 5063 0 1.65149E+00 5064 0 2.57144E+00 5065 0 1.28204E+00 5066 0 2.03042E+00 5067 0 1.84194E+00 5068 0 2.19053E+00 5069 0 1.60831E+00 5070 0 1.74019E+00 5071 0 2.26117E+00 5072 0 2.03806E+00 5073 0 1.72216E+00 5074 0 1.85539E+00 5075 0 2.63024E+00 5076 0 1.83669E+00 5077 0 2.14260E+00 5078 0 2.51501E+00 5079 0 2.49607E+00 5080 0 2.41369E+00 5081 0 2.96812E+00 5082 0 3.02333E+00 5083 0 3.32480E+00 5084 0 3.57083E+00 5085 0 4.01884E+00 5086 0 4.60617E+00 5087 0 5.02159E+00 5088 0 5.83618E+00 5089 0 6.48797E+00 5090 0 7.21747E+00 5091 0 8.07043E+00 5092 0 8.50871E+00 5093 0 7.20037E+00 5094 0 5.23911E+00 5095 0 3.32173E+00 5096 0 5.24696E+00 5097 0 7.57276E+00 5101 0 9.91269E+00

5098 0 2.64320E+01

Page 91: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-602000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.14 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3682 0 -2.45327E+01 1.63667E+01 -2.92705E+01

3683 0 2.58801E+01 -2.29807E+01 -2.83025E+01 3684 0 -3.48079E+01 -3.94457E+01 2.47430E+01 3685 0 5.93088E+01 -8.94125E+01 -8.55358E+00 3686 0 -4.28112E+01 -2.91137E+01 5.84573E+01 3687 0 7.70852E+01 -6.46525E+01 6.30935E+01 3688 0 3.89780E+01 -1.39511E+01 -9.17947E+01 3689 0 -2.28137E-01 3.94988E+01 -7.71188E+01

Refer to Fig.16.2.6 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 92: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-612000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670-17339 is shown in Fig.16.6.2.13. The maximum deflection is-.0523 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.29 DEFLECTION PLOT OF CC670-17339,CLOSED DOOR

Page 93: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-622000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.30, Fig.16.6.31 and Fig.16.6.32respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.123. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.123 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 4.6.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0521. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0521 x 1.1)) - 1 = 16.4.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.0540. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0540 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 11.9.

Page 94: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-632000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.30 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 95: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-642000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.31 NORMALIZED STESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 96: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-652000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.32 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 97: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-662000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5110 and 5111 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 50.6 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.15.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 26.5+ 24.1) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 50.6 / (.125 x 0.166) = 2438.6 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 2438.6) – 1 = 28.5

ROLLER FITTING

The maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3680 is:Shear load = (75.02 +51.12)1/2 = 90.7, Table 16.6.16.

The door thickness in this region is .2822 and the bolt diameter is.1875.

σbr = 90.7/(.2822 x .1875) =1714.2 lbs/in2 . MS = (72000/ 1714.2) – 1 = 42.0 High margin of safety.

Page 98: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-672000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.15 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339

Node Pos RESULTANTS 5108 0 1.12856E+01 5109 0 1.90477E+01 5110 0 2.64997E+01 5111 0 2.41418E+01 5112 0 1.87639E+01 5113 0 1.22639E+01 5114 0 6.72406E+00 5115 0 4.09896E+00 5116 0 2.86668E+00 5117 0 2.33893E+00 5118 0 2.03711E+00 5119 0 1.80696E+00 5120 0 1.79471E+00 5121 0 1.95409E+00 5122 0 1.88490E+00 5123 0 1.64301E+00 5124 0 1.66985E+00 5125 0 1.98228E+00 5126 0 1.76494E+00 5127 0 1.54932E+00 5128 0 1.62702E+00 5129 0 1.79731E+00 5130 0 1.35630E+00 5131 0 1.93916E+00 5132 0 1.86005E+00 5133 0 3.40462E+00 5134 0 4.40400E+00 5135 0 3.94177E+00 5136 0 2.92879E+00 5137 0 1.95491E+00 5138 0 2.54038E+00 5139 0 3.11543E+00 5140 0 3.79654E+00 5141 0 5.01860E+00

5142 0 3.59612E+00

Page 99: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-682000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.16 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339Ele Pos Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3678 0 7.81992E+00 4.81932E+01 3.79651E+01

3679 0 4.84256E+01 1.13816E+01 3.99532E+01 3680 0 3.43438E+01 7.50637E+01 -5.11288E+01 3681 0 -1.42023E+01 -1.20926E+00 -3.19674E+01 4048 0 7.13254E+00 -5.78780E+00 2.88724E+00 4049 0 -8.60171E+00 9.92662E+00 1.04029E+00 4050 0 -9.46323E+00 -9.79574E+00 6.11760E-01 4051 0 1.08732E+01 5.66318E+00 -4.57094E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.6 for the location of the CBAR elements.

TABLE 16.6.17 ACTUATOR SPC

ACTUATOR TX TY TZ *RESULTANT

1 -.33 104.5 40.5 112.02 1.54 107.4 41.2 115

3 1.44 125.3 58.1 138.1

*RESULTANT = AXIAL LOAD IN ACTUATOR ROD

Page 100: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-692000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.6.3 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE OPENED DOORPOSITION WITH A +2.0 PSI LOAD APPLIED

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17325 is shown in Fig.16.6.33. The maximum deflection is.191 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.33 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 101: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-702000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.34, Fig.16.6.35 and Fig.16.6.3.6respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.273. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.273 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 1.6.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .0927. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/(0.0927 x 1.1)) - 1 = 8.8.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.142. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.142 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 3.9.

Page 102: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-712000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.34 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 103: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-722000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.35 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 104: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-732000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.36 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 105: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-742000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 4542 and 4543 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 126.3 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.19.

The hole diameter is .125 inches, the skin thickness is .166 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 98.2 + 28.1) lbs/ (0.125 x 0.166)

= 126.3 / (.125 x 0.166) = 6086.7 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 6086.7) – 1 = 10.8

ROLLER FITTINGS

The maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3699 is:Shear load = (67.22 + 142.32)1/2 = 158.3 lbs, Table 16.6.20.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 inches and the boltdiameter is 3/16 inches.

σbr = ( 158.3) lbs/ (0.3154 x 0.1875) = 2676.8 lbs/in2

MS = (72000/ 2676.8) – 1 = 25.9

Page 106: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-752000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.18 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17325Node Pos RESULTANT

4542 0 9.81784E+01 4543 0 2.81044E+01 4544 0 2.89034E+01 4545 0 2.59491E+01 4546 0 2.46976E+01 4547 0 1.98971E+01 4548 0 1.71653E+01 4549 0 1.50599E+01 4550 0 1.39873E+01 4551 0 1.28579E+01 4552 0 1.23948E+01 4553 0 1.16600E+01 4554 0 1.15678E+01 4555 0 1.09648E+01 4556 0 1.06950E+01 4557 0 1.08813E+01 4558 0 9.76176E+00 4559 0 9.61206E+00 4560 0 9.11023E+00 4561 0 9.04565E+00 4562 0 8.78691E+00 4563 0 9.63410E+00 4564 0 1.11048E+01 4565 0 1.23637E+01 4566 0 1.51435E+01

4521 0 1.51891E+01 4522 0 1.22759E+01 4523 0 9.67766E+00 4524 0 2.15253E+01 4525 0 2.94866E+01 4526 0 1.68740E+01

TABLE 16.6.19 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17325

ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3698 0 7.17809E+01 4.44871E+01 7.45966E+01

3699 0 -8.61027E+01 -6.72454E+01 1.47286E+02 3700 0 4.95360E+01 -1.23608E+02 -6.66358E+01 3701 0 -1.27297E+02 -2.49106E+02 -1.53936E+00 4024 0 -1.69501E+01 1.54375E+01 1.21317E+00 4025 0 1.65237E+01 -7.22158E+00 1.70239E+00 4026 0 1.16457E+01 1.69436E+00 -1.05225E+01 4027 0 -1.11677E+01 -9.89329E+00 7.60184E+00

Refer to Fig.16.2.4 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 107: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-762000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670-17330 is shown in Fig.16.6.37. The maximum deflection is.241 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.37 DEFLECTION PLOT FOR CC670-17330, OPEN DOOR

Page 108: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-772000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.38, Fig.16.6.39 and Fig.16.6.40respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.386. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.386 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = .81.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .172. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.172 x 1.1)) - 1 = 4.3.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.208. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.208 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 2.4.

Page 109: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-782000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.38 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 110: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-792000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.39 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 111: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-802000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.40 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 112: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-812000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5006 and 5007 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 112.1 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.20.

The hole diameter is .1875 inches, the skin thickness is .116 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 15.2 + 96.9) lbs/ (0.1875 x 0.116)

= 112.1 / (.1875 x 0.116) = 5154.0 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 5154.0) – 1 = 12.9

ROLLER FITTINGThe maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3696 is:Shear load = (155.02 + 210.62)1/2 = 261.5 lbs, Table 16.6.21.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 inches and the boltdiameter is 3/16 inches.

σbr = ( 261.5) lbs/ ( .3154 x 0.1875) = 4421.9 lbs/in2

MS = (72000/ 4421.9) – 1 = 15.3

Page 113: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-822000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.20 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17330Node Pos RESULTANT4927 0 1.10470E+01

4928 0 2.58296E+01 4929 0 5.34821E+01

4813 0 7.28606E+01 4930 0 7.48694E+01 4932 0 6.33087E+01 4933 0 4.45354E+01 4934 0 3.39727E+01 4935 0 2.42926E+01 4936 0 1.75086E+01 4937 0 1.24972E+01 4938 0 8.75692E+00 4939 0 6.12522E+00 4940 0 4.22230E+00 4941 0 4.02943E+00 4942 0 3.18585E+00 4943 0 3.71676E+00 4944 0 5.45245E+00 4945 0 3.91898E+00 4946 0 6.00942E+00 4947 0 4.48970E+00 4948 0 5.31590E+00 4949 0 5.87680E+00 4950 0 6.07172E+00 4951 0 4.90638E+00 4952 0 4.98168E+00 4953 0 7.03027E+00 4954 0 3.90140E+00 4955 0 6.73416E+00 4956 0 4.57749E+00 4957 0 4.94697E+00 4958 0 6.81873E+00 4959 0 3.78926E+00 4960 0 5.76367E+00 4961 0 6.03126E+00 4962 0 4.64885E+00 4963 0 5.02076E+00 4964 0 6.56748E+00 4965 0 4.55018E+00 4986 0 4.97763E+00

4966 0 7.18459E+00 4967 0 3.92286E+00 4968 0 5.99043E+00

Page 114: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-832000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

NODE POS RESULTANT4969 0 6.15739E+00

4970 0 4.51353E+004971 0 5.69206E+004972 0 5.06802E+00

4973 0 5.46831E+00 4974 0 5.08484E+00 4975 0 7.08152E+00 4976 0 4.02316E+00 4977 0 6.55385E+00 4978 0 5.45673E+00 4979 0 5.03615E+00 4980 0 7.32137E+00 4981 0 4.46662E+00 4982 0 6.79613E+00

4985 0 5.71610E+004983 0 5.72773E+00

4984 0 5.97556E+00 4987 0 6.85590E+00 4988 0 6.75277E+00 4989 0 5.25380E+00 4990 0 6.71510E+00 4991 0 5.04556E+00 4992 0 6.38931E+00 4993 0 6.39010E+00 4994 0 4.97499E+00 4995 0 6.58509E+00 4996 0 7.25583E+00 4997 0 6.66713E+00 4998 0 1.01254E+01 4999 0 1.19454E+01 5000 0 1.16383E+01 5001 0 1.49010E+01 5002 0 1.29583E+01 5003 0 1.16434E+01 5004 0 1.33798E+01 5005 0 2.34265E+01 5006 0 1.51836E+01 5007 0 9.69218E+01

Page 115: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-842000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.21 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17330ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3690 0 6.02642E+01 3.78518E+01 7.59469E+01

3691 0 -3.65891E+01 1.18874E+01 1.74116E+02 3692 0 7.52167E+01 -1.24200E+02 -1.32403E+02 3693 0 -1.74818E+02 -9.27582E+01 -1.08454E+02 3694 0 6.72390E+01 1.10044E+02 -1.72360E+02 3695 0 -2.09642E+02 8.69287E+01 -1.27457E+02 3696 0 2.08785E+01 1.55231E+02 2.10647E+02 3697 0 -6.77425E+01 7.68708E+01 1.92942E+02

Refer to Fig.16.2.5 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 116: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-852000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17334 is shown in Fig.16.6.41. The maximum deflection is.131 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.41 DEFLECTION PLOT, IN. (ULTIMATE)

Page 117: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-862000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.16.6.42, Fig.16.6.43 and Fig.16.6.44respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.352. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.353 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = .98.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .131. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.131 x 1.1)) - 1 = 5.9.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.165. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.165 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 3.2.

Page 118: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-872000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.42 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 119: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-882000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.43 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 120: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-892000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.44 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 121: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-902000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5016 and 5017 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 151.2 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.22.

The hole diameter is .1875 inches, the skin thickness is .116 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 75.8 +75.4) lbs/ (0.1875 x 0.116)

= 151.2 / (.1875 x 0.116) = 6951.7 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 6951.7) – 1 = 9.4

ROLLER FITTINGThe maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3688 is:Shear load = (35.12 + 259.7)1/2 = 262.1 lbs, Table 16.6.23.

The door thickness in this region is .3154 inches and the boltdiameter is 3/16 inches.

σbr = ( 262.1) lbs/ (0.3154 x 0.1875) = 4432.0 lbs/in2

MS = (72000/ 4432.0) – 1 = 15.2

Page 122: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-912000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.22 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17334Node Pos RESULTANT5016 0 7.57741E+01

5017 0 7.54396E+01 5018 0 6.68787E+01 5019 0 4.42393E+01 5020 0 2.53764E+01 5021 0 1.47459E+01 5022 0 6.68727E+00 5023 0 8.37695E+00 5024 0 1.21917E+01 5025 0 7.91187E+00 5026 0 6.33743E+00 5027 0 5.81690E+00 5028 0 6.19879E+00 5029 0 6.72995E+00 5030 0 7.53082E+00 5031 0 7.44651E+00 5032 0 8.09740E+00 5033 0 8.30214E+00 5034 0 8.39818E+00 5035 0 6.87475E+00 5036 0 6.71088E+00 5037 0 6.87890E+00 5038 0 6.98629E+00 5039 0 4.24333E+00 5040 0 5.56633E+00 5041 0 5.25802E+00 5042 0 5.43837E+00 5043 0 4.77806E+00 5044 0 4.42188E+00 5045 0 5.53539E+00 5046 0 3.95953E+00 5047 0 4.64627E+00 5048 0 4.24921E+00 5049 0 6.31042E+00 5050 0 3.22829E+00 5051 0 5.01463E+00 5052 0 4.59423E+00 5053 0 5.85536E+00 5054 0 3.19884E+00 5055 0 5.01148E+00 5056 0 4.56823E+00 5057 0 5.45222E+00 5058 0 3.87090E+00

Page 123: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-922000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

5059 0 4.58718E+00

NODE POS RESULTANT5060 0 4.12013E+005061 0 6.44317E+00

5062 0 3.45296E+00 5063 0 4.12811E+00 5064 0 6.41555E+00 5065 0 3.19131E+00 5066 0 5.06054E+00 5067 0 4.59508E+00 5068 0 5.46602E+00 5069 0 3.98561E+00 5070 0 4.30734E+00 5071 0 5.61476E+00 5072 0 5.06388E+00 5073 0 4.20250E+00 5074 0 4.52145E+00 5075 0 6.48745E+00 5076 0 4.35233E+00 5077 0 5.08652E+00 5078 0 6.02751E+00 5079 0 5.92428E+00 5080 0 5.46902E+00 5081 0 6.83134E+00 5082 0 6.83548E+00 5083 0 7.51520E+00 5084 0 7.81528E+00 5085 0 8.76838E+00 5086 0 1.01634E+01 5087 0 1.07983E+01 5088 0 1.26551E+01 5089 0 1.40786E+01 5090 0 1.58118E+01 5091 0 1.77164E+01 5093 0 1.60592E+01 5094 0 1.15184E+01 5095 0 6.14166E+00 5096 0 1.06869E+01 5097 0 1.54476E+01

5101 0 2.24180E+015098 0 7.22484E+01

Page 124: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-932000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.23 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17334ELEM. POS Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)3682 0 6.45015E+01 -5.62129E+01 7.21384E+01

3683 0 -7.00207E+01 6.60239E+01 7.44050E+01 3684 0 9.42873E+01 8.02515E+01 -6.20751E+01 3685 0 -1.50402E+02 2.26524E+02 3.05702E+01 3686 0 1.15836E+02 6.71702E+01 -1.39331E+02 3687 0 -1.98699E+02 1.67304E+02 -1.48551E+02 3688 0 -8.64334E+01 3.50987E+01 2.59668E+02 3689 0 1.13066E+00 -7.31679E+01 2.11282E+02

Refer to Fig.16.2.6 for the location of the CBAR elements.

Page 125: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-942000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

The deflection plot under ultimate load conditions for sectionCC670- 17339 is shown in Fig.16.6.45. The maximum deflection is.126 inches.

FIGURE 16.6.45 DEFLECTION PLOT FOR CC670-17339, OPEN DOOR

Page 126: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-952000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

A plot of the normalized stress for fiber compression, fiber tensionand matrix are shown in Fig.13.6.46, Fig.13.6.47 and Fig.13.6.48respectively.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber compression is 0.262. Themargin of safety is:

MS = (1/ (0.262 x 1.1 x 1.3 )) - 1 = 1.67.

The maximum normalized stress in fiber tension is .108. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.108 x 1.1)) - 1 = 7.4.

The maximum normalized stress for the matrix is 0.135. The marginof safety is:

MS = (1/(0.135 x 1.1 x 1.3)) - 1 = 4.2.

Page 127: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-962000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.46 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER COMPRESSION

Page 128: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-972000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.47 NORMALIZED STRESS IN FIBER TENSION

Page 129: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-982000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

FIGURE 16.6.48 MATRIX NORMALIZED STRESS

Page 130: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-992000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

HINGE FITTING

The node spacing along the hinge line is such that 2 consecutivenodes represents 1 fastener of the hinge fitting. The combinedmaximum resultant SPC forces for 2 consecutive nodes is given bynodes 5010 and 5111 and is used to calculate the maximum bearingstress. The combined resultant SPC force is 141.0 lbs. The spcresultant forces are given in Table 16.6.24.

The hole diameter is .1875 inches, the skin thickness is .116 inches.The bearing stress is:

σbr = (maximum resultant force)/(skin thickness x hole diameter)

σbr = ( 72.83 + 68.2) lbs/ (0.1875 x 0.116)

= 141.0 / (.1875 x 0.116) = 6482.8 lbs/in2

The bearing allowable is 72 ksi. The margin of safety is:

MS = (72000/ 6482.8) – 1 = 10.1

The maximum shear load acting through the CBAR, element 3680 is:Shear load = (169.62 + 155.62)1/2 = 230.2 lbs, Table 16.6.25.

The door thickness in this region is .282 inches and the bolt diameteris 3/16 inches.

σbr = ( 230.2) lbs/ (0.282 x 0.1875) = 4353.7 lbs/in2

MS = (72000/ 4353.7) – 1 = 15.5

Page 131: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-1002000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.24 HINGE SPC RESULTANTS FOR CC670-17339Node Pos RESULTANT

5108 0 2.36845E+01 5109 0 5.15095E+01 5110 0 7.28276E+01 5111 0 6.82202E+01 5112 0 5.18147E+01 5113 0 3.45489E+01 5114 0 1.93331E+01 5115 0 1.09466E+01 5116 0 6.58636E+00 5117 0 4.56187E+00 5118 0 3.69419E+00 5119 0 3.21537E+00 5120 0 3.47954E+00 5121 0 4.15641E+00 5122 0 4.08160E+00 5123 0 3.39966E+00 5124 0 3.66209E+00 5125 0 4.55880E+00 5126 0 3.93831E+00 5127 0 3.25108E+00 5128 0 3.62778E+00 5129 0 4.14103E+00 5130 0 2.92468E+00 5131 0 4.63613E+00 5132 0 4.38499E+00 5133 0 8.37170E+00 5134 0 1.09021E+01 5135 0 9.81392E+00 5136 0 7.29872E+00 5137 0 4.73890E+00 5138 0 6.17865E+00 5139 0 7.64217E+00 5140 0 9.30663E+00 5141 0 1.23535E+01 5142 0 8.86482E+00

Page 132: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-1012000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

TABLE 16.6.25 ROLLER FITTING FASTENER FORCES FOR CC670-17339Elem. Pos Fx(AXIAL) Fy(SHEAR) Fz(SHEAR)

3678 0 -8.33705E+00 -1.21292E+02 -1.04431E+02 3679 0 -1.22435E+02 -4.27013E+01 -9.04827E+01 3680 0 -5.19793E+01 -1.69596E+02 1.55606E+02 3681 0 1.34560E+01 -7.01993E+00 1.15014E+02 4048 0 -1.77897E+01 1.44157E+01 -7.21426E+00 4049 0 2.14579E+01 -2.48120E+01 -2.57687E+00 4050 0 2.36008E+01 2.45012E+01 -1.56315E+00 4051 0 -2.71211E+01 -1.41205E+01 1.14332E+01

Refer to Fig.16.2.7 for the location of the CBAR elements.

TABLE 16.6.26 ACTUATOR SPC FORCS

ACTUATOR TX TY TZ *RESULTANT

1 .029 299.7 -.011 299.7

2 -.23 312.5 .17 312.5

3 -.010 383.3 -.003 383.3

*RESULTANT = AXIAL LOAD IN ACTUATOR ROD

Page 133: Composite Stress Analysis

16. DOC:REV:PAGE:DATE:

RAS-CC670-203NC

16.6-1022000-04-20

FIXED TRAILING EDGE STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Section: 16.6: STRESS ANALYSIS

Prepared: SHELLEY CLARKE Checked: JOHN HUDDART Approved: SALAMONHARAVAN

BT0107-12 MW97 1999-03

16.6.4 STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE BUTE DOOR IN THE OPENED DOORPOSITION WITH A -.65 PSI LOAD APPLIED

The model for this load case is the same as the +2.5 psi load case.Applying a negative load 3 times smaller than +2.5 psi results indisplacements that are approximately 3 times smaller but in theopposite direction. The results of this analysis is not presentedbecause larger margins are obtained.