Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not...

24
Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to which he is affiliated.

Transcript of Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not...

Page 1: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UKDavid Stallibrass

Shanghai | December 2012

Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to which he is affiliated.

Page 2: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Three pillars of compliance

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 3: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Deterrence is key to effective compliance

3

Never started because of fear of enforcement

Stopped through enforcement

Page 4: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Deterrence is key to effective compliance

4

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 5: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Deterrence is key to effective compliance

5

Less clarity and enforcement

Often not even considered!

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 6: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

The agencies’ responsibility

6

Page 7: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

A note on “private enforcement of public law”

7

Limited private enforcement in UK and EU

Strong private enforcement in US

Judges rule on whether a contract or action is legal based on whether it is compatible with the objectives of the law Not on the extent to which it harmed the

plaintiff

Private enforcement can support the role of competition agencies

Page 8: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: lack of knowledge

8

Firms think knowledge of

competition law is important, but don’t really know what the

law is!

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 9: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: all sanctions relevant

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 10: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: all sanctions relevant

Though damage is often done by the

investigation, not the finding of guilt

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 11: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: all sanctions relevant

Though much lower than likely benefits of

collusion

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 12: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: all sanctions relevant

Probably considered more important by

small businesses than large ones

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 13: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

A note on penalties

13

Substantial increase in likely fines (though still capped at

maximum 10% of global firm

turnover)

Though still less than likely

overcharge!

And chance of capture is <100% so if fines are the only

sanction, it’s profitable to break the law!

Connor (2006). Connor and Lande (2007). OFT 423 guidance on appropriate penalty (2012).

Page 14: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: Individuals comply for different reasons

14

In a behavioral experiment, different people reacted to different incentives

Some people care about expected returns Deter through high fines, effective enforcement

Some people care about personal risk Highlight risks, create individual sanctions

Some people want to do the right thing Educate industry, and the public

OFT 1391: The impact of competition interventions on compliance and deterrence

Page 15: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Compliance in the UK: Policy response

Continued high-profile enforcement Detailed decisions, strong media presence, high fines

Focus on individual incentives Director Disqualification and Criminal Sanctions

Guidance to company Directors

Increase transparency and guidance New competition law guidance

New guidance on compliance

15

OFT 1330: Quick guide to competition law. OFT 1340: Company directors. OFT 1341: Achieving Compliance OFT 510 : Director

Disqualification.

Page 16: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

16OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 17: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

17

What competition compliance issues might your firm face? Dominant?

Involved in bidding?

Regular contact with competitors?

Joint ventures and partnerships?

Complex vertical contracts?

OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 18: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

18

Where is your risk highest? Which staff?

Which events?

Which contracts?

Which business practices?

Which relationships?

OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 19: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

19

Mitigate the risk External legal advice

Training

Compliance programs

SME awareness

Creating a compliant culture

OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 20: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

20

Review your effectiveness Has your mitigation been

successful?

Are there any new risks?

Have any old risks changes or decreased?

Is there a clear culture of compliance at all levels?

OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 21: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Four step guidance to firm compliance

21

Ensure a core commitment to compliance from the top down

Appoint a responsible director for compliance with competition law

OFT 1341: Achieving compliance

Page 22: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

A note on fine reduction

The OFT will sometimes reduce a firms fine if it had a compliance program in place and shows good faith during the investigation

Other authorities think that “compliance is its own reward”

Compared to getting the big things right, it’s not very important

22OFT 423 guidance on appropriate penalty (2012).

Page 23: Compliance in the UK David Stallibrass Shanghai | December 2012 Personal views of author. Does not represent opinion or position of any institutions to.

Conclusion

23