Complete Support Global REV 1.0

75
1 Complete Support Global REV 1.0 Complete Support Global REV 1.0

description

Complete Support Global REV 1.0. 1. Complete Support Global REV 1.0. ГРУППА КОМПАНИЙ INGLASS. Основанная в 1987 году по названием Incos компания INglass расположена в г. Сан Поло ди Пьяве (Италия). Компания занимается разработкой и изготовлением пресс-форм для литья пластмасс. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 INGLASS 1987 Incos INglass . (). - . 1991 - ( ). 2001 HRSFlow, . 2004 - , . ( - ). 2006 (M.O.M). 2007 , , -, , (Selective Laser Melting).

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 Inglass-HRSflow : 300 . Inglass-HRSflow ( - . ). . INGLASS-HRSFLOW

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 INGLASS-HRSFLOW 2009 HRSFlow INGLASS -

    Grafico1

    000165

    000174

    30604050

    40737266

    477875109

    21520092009130

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy

    INGLASS Italy

    HRSFLOW Italy

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES

    INGLASS EMPLOYEES

    Grafico4

    000165

    000174

    30604050

    40737266

    44

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy

    INGLASS Italy

    HRSFLOW Italy

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES

    DIPENDENTI INGLASS

    Foglio1

    EUROPA26.2

    USA CANADA18

    JAPAN/KOREA37.2

    CINA10

    OTHER8.6

    100

    Foglio1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Foglio2

    EUROPA17

    USA CANADA3.7

    JAPAN/KOREA0

    CINA1.3

    OTHER0

    Foglio2

    17

    3.7

    0

    1.3

    0

    Foglio3

    EUROPA60

    USA26

    ASIA10

    BRASILE4

    100

    Foglio3

    60

    26

    10

    4

    Foglio4

    EUROPA80

    USA9

    ASIA10

    BRASILE1

    100

    Foglio4

    80

    9

    10

    1

    DIPENDENTI

    Produzione32

    Impiegati60

    Dirigenti/quadri5

    DIPENDENTI

    32

    60

    5

    EBIT

    2004

    20052870

    20062138

    200420052006

    211928702138

    EBIT

    2004

    20052870

    20062138

    Foglio6

    2870

    2138

    Foglio7

    20042119

    20052870

    20062138

    2119

    2870

    2138

    2003200420052006

    4,1785,0499,33711,418

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    4178

    5049

    9337

    11418

    200420052006200720082009

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy00304047215

    INGLASS Italy00607378

    HRSFLOW Italy00407275

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES1651745066109130

    TOTAL165174180251

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    00000

    00000

    00000

    00000

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy

    INGLASS Italy

    HRSFLOW Italy

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES

    TOTAL

    0

    0

    0

    165

    00000

    00000

    00000

    00000

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy

    INGLASS Italy

    HRSFLOW Italy

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES

    TOTAL

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    0000

    INGLASS / HRSFLOW Italy

    INGLASS Italy

    HRSFLOW Italy

    FOREIGN EMPLOYEES

    DIPENDENTI INGLASS

    Grafico4

    0.65

    0.35

    Foglio1

    HRSFLOWINGLASS

    50%65%35%

    50%

    Foglio1

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

    Grafico1

    1410

    1615

    1717

    1923

    1929

    1935

    INGLASS

    HRSFLOW

    YEARS

    Foglio1

    20012002200320042005

    Incos Spa17,522,95612,233,493518,000318,000

    Incos Srl8,716,20520,167,08023,000,000

    INCOS17,522,95621,349,69821,192,32624,138,39731

    2001200220032004

    AS2,927,4180.00.00.0

    2001200220032004

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI15,362,95617,549,69815,185,08014,318,000

    20012002200320042005

    CAMERE CALDE2,927,4183,800,0006,007,2469,820,39713,974,225

    20012002200320042005200620072008Budget 2009

    INGLASS15,362,95617,549,69815,185,080141617191919

    INGLASS GLASING

    HRS2,160,0003,800,0006,007,246101517232935

    17,522,95621,349,69821,192,32624313423

    Foglio2

    Foglio2

    1996414

    3931123

    7672435

    9323469

    10402891

    12936756

    11770013

    13262549

    17522956

    21349698

    21192326

    24138397

    27474225

    INCOS

    Foglio3

    1278799

    1495720

    2199995

    1949572

    2249863

    2962070

    3139208

    2842174

    2927418

    0

    0

    0

    AS

    15362956

    17549698

    15185080

    14318000

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI

    2927418

    3800000

    6007246

    9820397

    13974225

    CAMERE CALDE

    1536295620012160000

    1754969820023800000

    1518508020036007246

    14200410

    16200515

    INGLASS

    INGLASS GLASING

    HRS

    MBD0004FCE0.xls

    Grafico1

    11770013

    13262549

    153629562160000

    175496983800000

    151850806007246

    143180009820397

    15500000250000012000000

    15000000500000018000000

    INCOS TOOLING

    INGLASS TECHNOLOGY

    HRS FLOW

    YEARS 1999-2006

    Foglio1

    1993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

    Incos Spa1,996,4143,931,1237,672,4359,323,46910,402,89112,936,75611,770,01313,262,54917,522,95612,233,493518,000318,000

    Incos Srl8,716,20520,167,08023,000,000

    INCOS1,996,4143,931,1237,672,4359,323,46910,402,89112,936,75611,770,01313,262,54917,522,95621,349,69821,192,32624,138,39727,500,000

    199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004

    AS1,278,7991,495,7202,199,9951,949,5722,249,8632,962,0703,139,2082,842,1742,927,4180.00.00.0

    199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI1,996,4143,931,1237,672,4359,323,46910,402,89112,936,75611,770,01313,262,54915,362,95617,549,69815,185,08014,318,000

    1993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005

    CAMERE CALDE1,278,7991,495,7202,199,9951,949,5722,249,8632,962,0703,139,2082,842,1742,927,4183,800,0006,007,2469,820,39713,974,225

    19931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI1,996,4143,931,1237,672,4359,323,46910,402,89112,936,75611,770,01313,262,54915,362,95617,549,69815,185,08014,318,00015,500,00015,000,000

    INCOS STAMPI GLASING2,500,0005,000,000

    INCOS SOLO CC2,160,0003,800,0006,007,2469,820,39712,000,00018,000,000

    Foglio2

    Foglio2

    1996414

    3931123

    7672435

    9323469

    10402891

    12936756

    11770013

    13262549

    17522956

    21349698

    21192326

    24138397

    27474225

    INCOS

    Foglio3

    1278799

    1495720

    2199995

    1949572

    2249863

    2962070

    3139208

    2842174

    2927418

    0

    0

    0

    AS

    1996414

    3931123

    7672435

    9323469

    10402891

    12936756

    11770013

    13262549

    15362956

    17549698

    15185080

    14318000

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI

    1278799

    1495720

    2199995

    1949572

    2249863

    2962070

    3139208

    2842174

    2927418

    3800000

    6007246

    9820397

    13974225

    CAMERE CALDE

    199641419931993

    393112319941994

    767243519951995

    932346919961996

    1040289119971997

    1293675619981998

    1177001319991999

    1326254920002000

    1536295620012160000

    1754969820023800000

    1518508020036007246

    1431800020049820397

    15500000250000012000000

    INCOS SOLO STAMPI

    INCOS STAMPI GLASING

    INCOS SOLO CC

    11770013

    13262549

    153629562160000

    175496983800000

    151850806007246

    143180009820397

    15500000250000012000000

    15000000500000018000000

    INCOS TOOLING

    INGLASS TECHNOLOGY

    HRS FLOW

    YEARS 1999-2006

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    . / Inglass-HRSflow :- - - Inglass-HRSFlow : HRS INGLASS-HRSFLOW : -

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 INGLASS - HRSFlow - - + -+ HRSFlow + INGLASS GLAZING ( ) + - + , , CO2 + , , 2

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 . Inglass-HRSflow : (MFR , MFI , DSC , HDT , VST ); - ; - . . . . .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    :

    - - , .

    - - ( , ..).

    - .

    - Mold flow .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 - : 70% Deformation reduction

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 , . .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 PI (MoldFlow Plastics Insight)

    - - - - - - - -

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 : 60-75% (/ )

    ( Moldflow ) , - .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 - ( )- - (SLM) - - ISO PIPE MoldMax 11.8

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 , SLM -.

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 Inglass-HRSflow (WIT): 1,5 ()(: , ). . . (Water Injection Technology) , , , ( ).WIT

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.01. 2. 3. 4. 5. : ; (2 ); (, ), ;- : - :

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: 30-50% -

    HRSflow-Inglass -: -, MuCell. MuCell (SCF ) ,- SCF - SCF MuCell

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 .

    - - INGLASS-HRSFlow:170 180 800 2K MuCell1200 4K 2300 2K

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0- Inglass-HRS - .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.01500 700 ... -

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0M.O.M. ELD HRCU - ( ) - STC

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0- , :-

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0080507Ford motor company :

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 Moldflow: : -: - MOLD FLOW

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 - 6,81,8 MOLD FLOW

  • MOLDFLOW?Complete Support Global REV 1.0 : :

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Standard

    / () ()

    A1PA + GFKilo3.50000.60002.1000

    MATERIAL n2

    2.1000

    1- ()- - 1 (/) - 1 ()

    A1111.21.2

    1- ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A1110.50.50.25

    20.00%0.71

    / ()4.2600

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Part cost analysis example using co - injection

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo1.70000.20000.3400

    1.7400

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B2110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.0638

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.2538

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-1.0062-24%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-503,100

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-65%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.7836-65%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,391,775

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

    Standard

    Hereunder an example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.60002.1000

    MATERIAL n2

    2.1000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    20.00%0.71

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]4.2600

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Mold Flow

    / () ()

    A1PA + GFKilo3.50000.60002.1000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo

    2.1000

    - ()- - 1 (/) - - 1 ()

    B1111.21.2

    C- ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    B2110.50.50.25

    2.00%0.071

    / ()3.6210

    -0.6390-15%

    500000 ()-319,500

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-65%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.7836-65%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,391,775

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Mold Flow EFD : Mold Flow

    SLM: SLM

    -: -

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 ( SLM)

  • Complete Support Global REV 1.0: :

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Standard

    Hereunder an example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.40000.4000

    MATERIAL n2

    0.4000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    5.00%0.0925

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.9425

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Part cost analysis example using co - injection

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo1.70000.20000.3400

    1.7400

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B2110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.0638

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.2538

    DELTA WITH STANDARD1.311368%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []655,650

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    : : 30%

    / () ()

    A1PPKilo1.00000.40000.4000

    A1 2

    0.4000

    - ())- - 1 (/) - - 1 ()

    A10.711.20.84

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    1.00%0.014275

    / ()1.4418-26%

    -0,5007-0.5007-26%

    500000 ()-250,363

    Standard

    / () ()

    A1PPKilo1.00000.40000.4000

    2

    0.4000

    - ())- - 1 (/) - - 1 ()

    A1111.21.2

    ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A1110.50.50.25

    5.00%0.0925

    / ()1.9425

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Part cost analysis example using co - injection

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo1.70000.20000.3400

    1.7400

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B2110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.0638

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.2538

    DELTA WITH STANDARD1.311368%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []655,650

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-24%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-0.4661-24%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-233,025

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.01. 2. 3. 4. 5. . . HRSFlow

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.06-

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: :

    Standard

    / () ()

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kr3.50000.60002.1000

    2

    2.1000

    - ()- 1 (/) 1 ()

    A1111.21.2

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A1110.50.50.25

    2.00%0.071

    / ()3.6210

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Part cost analysis example using co - injection

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo1.70000.20000.3400

    1.7400

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B2110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.0638

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.2538

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-0.3672-10%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-183,600

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-59%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.1446-59%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,072,275

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

    Standard

    Hereunder an example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.60002.1000

    MATERIAL n2

    2.1000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.071

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.6210

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    / () ()

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kr3.50000.40001.4000

    A2 Kr1.00000.20000.2000

    1.6000

    - ()- - 1 (/) - - 1 ()

    B1111.21.2

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    B2110.50.50.25

    2.00%0.061

    / ()3.1110

    -0.5100-14%

    500000 ()-255,000

    33% recycled material

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-59%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.1446-59%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,072,275

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 MuCell . Trexel .

    MuCell () , . MUCELL

  • MUCELLComplete Support Global REV 1.0: :

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Standard

    / () ()

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.60002.1000

    MATERIAL n2

    2.1000

    - ()- 1 (/) 1 ()

    A1111.21.2

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A1110.50.50.25

    2.00%0.071

    / ()3.6210

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    Part cost analysis example using co - injection

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo1.70000.20000.3400

    1.7400

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    B2110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.0638

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.2538

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-0.3672-10%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-183,600

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-59%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.1446-59%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,072,275

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

    Standard

    Hereunder an example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo3.50000.60002.1000

    MATERIAL n2

    2.1000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1111.21.2

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A1110.50.50.25

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.071

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.6210

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    Coinjection

    MuCell

    / () ()

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kr3.50000.40001.4000

    A2RECYCLED MATERIALKilo

    1.4000

    - ()- 1 (/) 1 ()

    B10.911.21.08

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    B2110.50.50.25

    2.00%0.0546

    / ()2.7846

    -0.8364-23%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-418,200

    utilizzo di 33% mat riciclato

    Cooling

    Comparison with the same part realized with cooling optimization . Cycle time saving :20%

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1ABS+PC GF10%Kilo1.00000.30000.3000

    A1MATERIAL n 2Kilo0.00000.00000.0000

    0.3000

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.811.20.96

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.7510.50.50.1875

    SCRAP

    2.00%0.02895

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]1.4765-59%

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-2.1446-59%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-1,072,275

    riduzione tempo ciclo 20%

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 : ( ) / (intranet/internet)- - M.O.M.

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 : PC CHMSL: + : (M.O.M.) (M.O.M.) ( Diamond) - HRSflow /

  • ...Complete Support Global REV 1.0: MOM

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Standard

    / () ()

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    1- ()- - 1 (/) - - 1 ()

    A10.8521.20.51

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    1- ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    50.00%1.2084375

    / ()3.6253

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    MOM

    Part cost analysis example using M.O.M.

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8521.20.51

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    SCRAP

    5.00%0.12084375

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]2.5377

    DELTA WITH STANDARD-1.0876-30%

    Cost saving on 500.000 parts []-543,797

    Scrap reduction: 50% --> 5%

    Standard

    Example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8521.20.51

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    SCRAP

    50.00%1.2084375

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.6253

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    MOM

    ...

    / () ()

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    - ()- 1 (/) 1 ()

    A10.8521.20.51

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    5.00%0.12084375

    / ()2.5377

    -1.0876-30%

    500000 ()-543,797

    Scrap reduction: 50% --> 5%

    Standard

    Example of a standard part cost analysis

    RAW MATERIAL

    Ref.MATERIAL DESCRIPTIONUNIT OF MEASURECOST/UNIT OF MEASURE [Euro]GROSS USAGE PER UNITRAW MATERIAL TOTAL [Euro]

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    RAW MATERIAL PROCESSING

    MACHINE COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLEMACHINE MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]MACHINE SIZE & TYPEMACHINE COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8521.20.51

    OVERALL DIRECT LABOR COST

    Ref.MACHINE CYCLE TIME (Minutes)PIECES PER CYCLENUMBER OF OPERATORSDIRECT LABOR MINUTE RATE (Cost) [Euro]DIRECT LABOR COSTS PER OPERATION [Euro]

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    SCRAP

    50.00%1.2084375

    Raw Material Processing Total [Euro]3.6253

    Automatically calculated:(Machine Cycle Time) X (Machine Minute Cost) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Automatically calculated:(Cycle Time) X ( Number of Operators) X (Direct Labor Minute Rate) / (Pieces per Cycle)

    Number of Employes required for the operationExample: 0,5 (1 person operates on 2 machines)

    Direct labor hourly rate

    Time required to complete a cycle

    Time required to complete a cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    The number of pieces complete in one cycle

    Total cost of operating the machine, excluding the direct labor, stated as cost

    Percentage of scrap

    MOM

    ...

    / () ()

    A1PCKilo3.75000.50001.8750

    1.8750

    - ()- 1 (/) 1 ()

    A10.8521.20.51

    - ()- - 1 - - () - 1 ()

    A10.8520.250.30.031875

    5.00%0.12084375

    / ()2.5377

    -1.0876-30%

    500000 ()-543,797

    5 50%

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0...

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0M.O.M.

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 ?: 8 . HRSFlow M.O.M. , , .

    , ( ). , ( , ).

    .

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 HRSFlow + - - - -. , . .

  • Complete Support Global REV 1.0 ( - ). 2000 -/, 20,000/10 -. , , 500 - 1,000,000 .

    ( - ). ,000 .

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Foglio1

    5

    - 6010.50.1

    - 181320.4

    - 27364.50.9

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

    Foglio1

    5

    - 6010.50.1

    - 180210.2

    - 27142.50.5

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

  • INGLASS-HRS: Complete Support Global REV 1.0 1 2 3

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Foglio1

    1:

    HRS/Inglass 1 1

    1HRS/Inglass 1

    Moldflow ( , )HRS/Inglass 1 1

    ( , MuCell), HRS/Inglass 1 1

    HRS/Inglass - / 1 1

    -HRS/Inglass 1 1

    , , ... HRS/Inglass 1 1

    Definizione dei livelli qualitativi e di costo attesiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Fornitura di Componenti

    Definizione dei fornitoriFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione degli stampiStampistiHRS/InglassFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione delle camere caldeHRS/InglassStampistiFIAT

    Studio, progettazione e realizzazione di eventuali tasselli di raffreddamentoHRS/InglassStampisti / FIATFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione degli stampi per applicazioni LightingHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Purchasing in Cina di eventuali stampi a corollarioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Eventuali MOM ed ELDHRS/InglassFIAT

    Try outs e Lancio di produzione

    Presenza al try out e allavvio della linea di stampaggioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Definizione e/o supporto alla definizione del processo di stampaggioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Verifica degli standard qualitativi e di costo pre-definitiFIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    Eventuale, ulteriore miglioramento di ciclo/qualitFIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

  • INGLASS-HRS: Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    Foglio1

    Fornitura di Ingegneria (e coordinamento con gli stampisti):ResponsabileIn coordinamento conSupervisione

    studio di tutti i pezzi dellauto per individuare quelli criticiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    definizione dei materiali plastici.FIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    analisi delle criticit e loro ottimizzazione (mediante cooling, mold flow, warpage), quantificazione dei benefici (su qualit e costo)HRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Studio di applicazione di tecnologie differenti (coiniezione? Mucell?) e quantificazione del loro beneficioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    eventuale codesign del pezzoHRS/InglassStampisti / FIATFIAT

    Suggerimento di stampistiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Studio delle linee di stampaggio e valutazione di implementazione di MOM o ELD con quantificazione dei beneficiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Definizione dei livelli qualitativi e di costo attesiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Fornitura di ComponentiResponsabileIn coordinamento conSupervisione

    Definizione dei fornitoriFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione degli stampiStampistiHRS/InglassFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione delle camere caldeHRS/InglassStampistiFIAT

    Studio, progettazione e realizzazione di eventuali tasselli di raffreddamentoHRS/InglassStampisti / FIATFIAT

    Studio,progettazione e realizzazione degli stampi per applicazioni LightingHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Purchasing in Cina di eventuali stampi a corollarioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Eventuali MOM ed ELDHRS/InglassFIAT

    III: ,

    -HRS/Inglass 1 1

    HRS/Inglass 1 1

    , 1HRS/Inglass 1

    / 1HRS/Inglass 1

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

    Foglio1

    Fornitura di Ingegneria (e coordinamento con gli stampisti):ResponsabileIn coordinamento conSupervisione

    studio di tutti i pezzi dellauto per individuare quelli criticiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    definizione dei materiali plastici.FIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    analisi delle criticit e loro ottimizzazione (mediante cooling, mold flow, warpage), quantificazione dei benefici (su qualit e costo)HRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Studio di applicazione di tecnologie differenti (coiniezione? Mucell?) e quantificazione del loro beneficioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    eventuale codesign del pezzoHRS/InglassStampisti / FIATFIAT

    Suggerimento di stampistiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Studio delle linee di stampaggio e valutazione di implementazione di MOM o ELD con quantificazione dei beneficiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Definizione dei livelli qualitativi e di costo attesiHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    II:

    1

    - -HRS/Inglass 1

    HRS/Inglass - 1

    HRS/Inglass -/ 1 1

    - HRS/Inglass 1 1

    - HRS/Inglass 1 1

    ... (ELD)HRS/Inglass 1

    Try outs e Lancio di produzioneResponsabileIn coordinamento conSupervisione

    Presenza al try out e allavvio della linea di stampaggioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Definizione e/o supporto alla definizione del processo di stampaggioHRS/InglassFIATFIAT

    Verifica degli standard qualitativi e di costo pre-definitiFIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    Eventuale, ulteriore miglioramento di ciclo/qualitFIATHRS/InglassFIAT

    Foglio2

    Foglio3

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 100% - - - -

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0080507Ford motor company :, HRS-INGLASS

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 ZC1116.0 ZC1116.0 ZC1116.0PORSCHE CAYENNE: - + ()

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 ZC0420.0 ZC0418.0 ZC0419.0AUDI TT: , - +

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0MASERATI QUATTROPORTE:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0 H000747.0: : PP: , : , H001304.0: : PP: , : , BMW 6 :

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0MERCEDES S: : PP-EPDM : 7: , : , ,

    *

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0AUDI A6:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0CITROEN BERLINGO:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    (/): Visteon Sistemas Interiores Espena S.L.: PP : 18: , : E/A, ()

    ZC0472.0 CITROEN C4 PICASSO:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0AC100.0AC101.0AUDI A4:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0PORSCHE PANAMERA:

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0080507Ford motor company : HRS-INGLASS

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: Vimar: ABS : 2: : , 1P, , :

    : Vimar: PC : 1: : , 1P, , :

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: Vimar: PC : 2: : , 1P, :

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: 1171A05 mg-cpm CARD: PC : 16 : : F/2P, , 2 ()

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: AVENUE,JUNIOR,KID BOYKID BOY, Alessi Tupperware , , Alessi Alessi TUPPERWARE-

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: : PA6 : 4: : P/ F : : PC : 1 : : 1G,

    : - BTICINO: PP : 4 : : 1F,

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0: Saroplast : 4: : , 1P

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0TECHNICAL SCHEDULE FOR JOB H011911.0 : PHILIPS : PC-ABS : 4: , : , EP,

    (LCD TV)

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0TECHNICAL SCHEDULE FOR JOB H012415.0 : PHILIPS : O.M.B: PC : 8: : Diamond , MP : 4075 Flare V8 LCD 42

    (LCD TV)

  • *Complete Support Global REV 1.0

    ************************************************Since January 2007 HRS has had an 800 tonnes molding machine with Mucell system to be used for research and development and try outs for clientsMucell = it is a process consisting in the injection of a gas (nitrogen) into the fused polymer, which in its turn expands itself providing the indicated advantages *****************************VENDITORE: BONEZZI PAOLOVICE RESP: CHERINI CATERINA

    **VENDITORE: BONEZZI PAOLOVICE RESP: CHERINI CATERINA

    ******