Complete Streets Sussex - Eric Snyder
Transcript of Complete Streets Sussex - Eric Snyder
Complete Streets SummitOctober 21, 2013
Key Findings• There is a general support for consideration of complete streets “where
appropriate.” Not all streets need sidewalks, crosswalks, and bike lanes to accommodate complete streets in a rural context.
• Priority should be given to completing “missing links” in the sidewalk infrastructure. Connecting low-income and/or low mobility populations to shopping, schools and other services should also be prioritized.
• Bike accommodations should be strategically placed to link parks, trails and other recreational facilities and stay “off-road” wherever practicable.
• Safer trail crossings, and better linkages between recreational areas and nearby businesses is important to tourism.
• Initial and life-cycle cost was a major concern related to complete streets infrastructure. In addition, the responsible party for general maintenance (snow shoveling and weeding) of sidewalks caused apprehension.
• Communities should weigh the long term cost of not providing safe pedestrian/bicycle accommodation against initial capital cost (e.g. bussing students that could otherwise walk if safe accommodations were present).
• Complete Streets is a key component to the healthier communities initiative, critical for tourism, and important to retaining and attracting young residents.
Stakeholder Meetings
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
•Street Typology Plan
• Developed using public input from June 17 community meeting.
• Roadway types and design features reflect local desires and priorities.
• Roadway functions were articulated and desired operating speeds identified.
• Local examples identified.
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
Street Typology Draft – Sussex County Typology Workshop
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
Street Overlay Draft – Sussex County Typology Workshop
Street Types Identified & Function• Rural Highway A – long distance travel.
• Rural Highway B – thru traffic/land access.
• Rural Highway C – urban edge development.
• Main Street – mixed use, walking-oriented.
• Residential (Traditional) – grid development.
• Residential (Subdivision) – low/moderate density.
• County Connector – connects state highways.
• Trails & Greenways.
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
Typology: Rural Highway C urban edge development
Route 23, Franklin Borough
Typology: Main Streetmixed use, walking-oriented.
Spring Street
Typology: County Connector
Limecrest Road
Special Overlay Zones• Destination Streets.
• Village and Hamlet.
• School Zone/Trail Connector.
• Lake Street/Family-friendly.
• Scenic/Historical Highway.
• Natural Preservation Zone.
• Transit Stop.
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
Overlay: Lake Street
Initial policy and design recommendations
– All of the planning in this effort emphasizes specific contexts. There are no Madisons in Sussex County nor is it Monmouth.
– Lake streets were identified as a priority for traffic calming.
– Creating better connections to and between recreational trails was identified as a priority.
– Destination streets were identified as points of civic pride (Spring Street, Newton).
Transect-Based Implementation Planning
Challenges• Fast, left-turning traffic
• No third crosswalk
• Deteriorated physical condition of crosswalks
Strengths• Traditional town main street
designed for both pedestrians and motorists
• Proximity to destinations and employment
• Pedestrian signals and signage
Town of Newton
Route 206 - Main St. and Spring St.
1. Paint crosswalk on third leg of intersection.
2. Provide pedestrians a dedicated walk signal at this third crosswalk.
3. Install signage with wording similar to “Town of Newton is a Pedestrian- Friendly City” to stress to motorists the presence of pedestrians on Spring St.
Low Investment Strategies
Town of Newton
Route 206 and Spring St.
Town of Newton
Medium Investment Strategies1. Color unit pavers or
tinted concrete crosswalks.
2. Textured roadway surfaces approaching crosswalks for visual, audible, and vibratory alerts to motorists.
Route 206 and Spring St.
Route 519 from Water Street/Route 206 to North Park Drive
Challenges• Inconsistent pedestrian facilities• Lack of sidewalks in northern half• Gaps in sidewalks in southern half• Obstacles on east side of Route 519
where sidewalk could be built• Multiple, wide driveways
Strengths• Several generators of pedestrian
activity• Flat terrain and space in right-of-way
for sidewalks• Existing transit service
Town of Newton
Route 519 – from Water Street/Route 206 to North Park DriveMedium Investment Strategy
Town of Newton
• Build a consistent sidewalk from Swartswood Road to Project Self Sufficiency.
Example for Park Drive: Build sidewalks around the obstacles
Route 607/Hopatchung Rd/River Styx Rd from North River Styx Rd to Brooklyn Stanhope Rd
Challenges• Tight rights-of-way and no shoulders
in some areas• Limited sight distances• Inconsistent sidewalks• Seasonal higher traffic volumes
Strengths• Commercial destinations along the
road• Scenic road in spots, with lake
destinations
Hopatcong Borough
• Alternatives to full sidewalk installation that keep a semi-rural feel
• Create safe pedestrian spaces next to the road
Low Investment Strategy
Replace with new photo with crosswalks
Bucks County, PA
Portland, ORRolled curb
Rock separation between path and road
River Styx Road - North Segment
Lake Context:
Route 669/Limecrest Road fromSkytop Road to Long Pond School
Challenges• No sidewalks or paths
• Tight right-of-way with narrow shoulders
• Short sight distances
Strengths• Adjacent to natural
preservation area
• Close to a residential area
Andover Township
Andover Township
Route 669/Limecrest Road fromSkytop Road to Long Pond School
Medium Investment Strategy• Use Township of Andover land easement on
Limecrest Road across from Broadview Drive to provide off- road trail link to the school.
Andover Township
Route 669/Limecrest Road fromSkytop Road to Long Pond School
1. Sussex Branch Trail
2. Paulinskill Valley Trail
3. L&NE Trail
Challenges• Trails cross several major roads
• Low visibility of trail crossings from vehicles
• Fast-moving traffic
• No warnings of upcoming trail crossings for motorists in some instances
Sid Taylor Road and Route 206
Route 94 W of Route 15
Trail Crossing Improvements
• Painted crosswalks• Pedestrian refuge medians• Pedestrian-activated
overhead signal• Signs in advance of the
crossing
Give motorists warnings!
Trail CrossingsStrategies
Mid-block pedestrian refugePedestrian activated signals
Trail Crossings: Strategies
Thank You!