CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) · 2016–2017 ’ CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) ......

1 2016–2017

Competitive Events—High School Level Updated January 24, 2017 Competitive spirit and recognition of excellence reflect important aspects of the educational process that prepares students for their roles in the American enterprise system. Today’s students demand and deserve learning experiences that enable them to achieve success through effective participation in career-‐related activities designed to reach professional goals. The FBLA competitive events program offers this opportunity by providing support for curriculum development that facilitates practical applications and increases conceptual knowledge of Business and Information Technology principles. Events are based on projects developed from FBLA goals and Business and Information Technology curricula. General Information and Regulations 1. Events are divided into three categories—individual, team, and chapter—and may be administered

on the regional, state, and national levels. 2. A member may participate in any number of chapter events at the state level; however, students may

enter only one chapter event at the National Leadership Conference. 3. A member may enter only one individual or team event with the following exceptions:

• L. Marguerite Crumley, Frank Manning Peele, Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson Scholarships • D. J. Howard, Walker, Campbell, Shell, VBEA-‐Sarah Lowe Thompson Award of Excellence • Who’s Who in FBLA

4. Participants must be active members of an active chapter; associate members are not eligible for event competition.

5. Regional, state, and national dues must be paid by the date of the Regional Spring Conference or March 1, whichever comes first.

6. Reference manuals, textbooks, and other source materials, except those specifically listed in the guidelines, may not be taken to events.

7. Participants failing to report on time for an event may be disqualified. 8. Students, as well as advisers, through their participation in FBLA, should develop a keen awareness of

the image a person’s attire projects in the business world. 9. Calculators will be provided for all objective tests. PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐

storage devices are not allowed in any event. 10. Winning regional/state teams may make substitutions within their chapter if team members are

unable to compete at the SLC or NLC. 11. First-‐ through fourth-‐place winners are eligible to compete at the National Leadership Conference;

funding is available for the top two slots. Virginia FBLA-‐PBL Dress Code FBLA-‐PBL members and advisers should develop an awareness of the image a person’s attire projects. The purpose of the dress code is to uphold the professional image of the association and its members and to prepare students for the business world. Appropriate attire is required for all attendees—advisers, members, and guests—at all general sessions, competitive events, regional meetings, workshops, and other activities unless otherwise stated in the conference program. Conference name badges are part of this dress code and must be worn for all conference functions. For safety reasons, name badges should not be worn when outside of the hotel.

2 2016–2017

Professional attire acceptable for official Virginia FBLA-‐PBL activities includes Males

• business suit with collared dress shirt, and necktie or • sport coat, dress slacks, collared shirt, and necktie or • FBLA blazer (with emblem), dress shirt, dress slacks, and necktie or • dress slacks, collared shirt, and necktie • dress shoes and socks.

Females

• business suit (skirt or pants) or • skirt or dress slacks with sweater set/dress blouse (not cotton button-‐down shirts) or • FBLA blazer (with emblem), skirt, white blouse or • business dress • dress shoes • nylons when wearing skirts and dresses.

Inappropriate attire for both men and women includes the following:

• Jewelry in visible body piercing, other than ears • Visible tattoos • Denim or chambray fabric clothing of any kind, overalls, shorts, skorts, stretch or stirrup pants,

exercise or bike shorts • Backless, see-‐through, tight-‐fitting, spaghetti-‐strap, strapless, extremely short, or low-‐cut

blouses/tops/dresses/skirts • T-‐shirts, Lycra™, spandex, midriff tops, tank tops, bathing suits • Sandals, athletic shoes, industrial work shoes, hiking boots, bare feet, or over-‐the-‐knee-‐ boots • Athletic wear, including sneakers • Hats or flannel fabric clothing • Bolo ties • Visible undergarments or loungewear

Ladies do not have to wear nylons to the awards program. Note: Students may be disqualified from regional and state events for failure to adhere to the dress code.

3 2016–2017

Competitive Events Summary—High School R = Regional S = State N = National R S N 3D Animation—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Accounting I—Individual Event ! ! ! Accounting II—Individual Event ! ! ! Advertising—Individual Event ! ! !

American Enterprise Project—(no regional competition—schools with top 10 pre-‐judged scores will present at SLC)

! !

Banking & Financial Systems—Team Event ! ! ! Business Calculations—Individual Event ! ! ! Business Communication—Individual Event ! ! ! Business Ethics—Individual or Team Event ! ! ! Business Financial Plan—(no regional competition—schools with top 10

pre-‐judged scores will present at SLC) ! !

Business Law—Individual Event ! ! ! Business Plan—Individual or Team Event (no regional competition—schools

with top 10 pre-‐judged scores will present at SLC) ! !

Client Service—Individual Event ! ! ! Coding and Programming—Individual Event ! ! ! Community Service Project—Chapter Event ! ! Computer Applications—Individual Event ! ! ! Computer Game & Simulation Programming—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Computer Problem Solving—Individual Event ! ! ! Cyber Security—Individual Event ! ! ! Database Design & Applications—Individual Event ! ! ! Desktop Application Programming—Individual Event ! ! ! Digital Video Production—Individual or Team Event ! ! ! D. J. Howard/Walker/Shell/Campbell/VBEA Scholarship/S.L.T. Award of

Excellence—Individual Event !

E-‐Business—Individual or Team Event ! ! ! Economics—Individual Event ! ! ! Electronic Career Portfolio—Individual Event ! ! ! Emerging Business Issues—Individual or Team Event ! ! ! Entrepreneurship—Team Event ! ! ! FBLA Principles and Procedures—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Future Business Leader—Individual Event ! ! ! Global Business—Team Event ! ! ! Gold Seal Chapter Award of Merit (Hollis and Kitty Guy Award)—Chapter

Event !

Graphic Design—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Health Care Administration—Individual Event ! ! !

Help Desk—Individual Event ! ! !

Honor Chapter Award—Chapter Event !

4 2016–2017

R = Regional S = State N = National R S N Impromptu Speaking—Individual Event ! ! ! Insurance and Risk Management—Individual Event ! ! !

Introduction to Business—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Introduction to Business Communication—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Introduction to Business Presentation—Individual or Team Event—Grades

9 & 10 ! ! !

Introduction to Business Procedures—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! !

Introduction to Financial Math—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! !

Introduction to Information Technology—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Introduction to Parliamentary Procedure—Individual Event—Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Job Interview—Individual Event ! ! ! Journalism—Individual Event ! ! !

L. Marguerite Crumley, Frank Manning Peele, Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson Scholarships—Individual Event

! !

Largest Local Chapter Membership—Chapter Event ! ! ! LifeSmarts—Team Event !

Local Chapter Annual Business Report/Hamden L. Forkner Award—Chapter Event ! !

Management Decision Making—Team Event ! ! ! Management Information Systems—Team Event ! ! ! Marketing—Team Event ! ! ! Microsoft Office Specialist Excel and Word !

Mobile Application Development—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Network Design—Team Event ! ! ! Networking Concepts—Individual Event ! ! ! Organizational Leadership—Individual Event ! ! !

Parliamentary Procedure/D.L. Travis Award—Team Event ! ! ! Partnership with Business Project—Chapter Event ! ! Personal Finance—Individual Event ! ! ! Public Service Announcement—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Publication Design—Individual or Team Event ! ! !

Public Speaking I—Individual Event Grades 9 & 10 ! ! ! Public Speaking II—Individual Event ! ! ! Sales Presentation—Individual ! ! !

Securities and Investments—Individual ! ! !

Social Media Campaign—Individual or Team ! ! !

Spreadsheet Applications—Individual Event ! ! ! State Service Project—Project ASK—Chapter Event ! Virtual Business Management Challenge— Individual or Team Event ! Website Design—Individual or Team Event ! ! ! Who’s Who in FBLA—Individual Event ! ! Word Processing—Individual Event ! ! !

5 2016–2017

Note Virginia FBLA’s Competitive Events Program does not include national events taught in the Marketing Education curriculum, i.e., Agribusiness, Hospitality Management, and Sports Management. Marketing is taught in the Principles of Business and Marketing curriculum; therefore, the competitive event, Marketing, is part of the Virginia FBLA Competitive Events Program.

6 2016–2017

Point System for High School FBLA Honor Chapters Points Received Activity 1. Each local chapter activity reported—maximum of 20

points; must be a balanced program (only 2 reports in each area)

2. Dues in on time, November 1 (5) 3. Advisers Form in on time, October 1 (2) 4. Officers Form in on time, October 1 (2) 5. Chartering and/or reactivating a chapter (5) 6. Promoting each new or inactive chapter (3) 7. Officer candidate: Regional (1) State (2) National (3) 8. State officer (including Regional President) (5) 9. Regional officer (other than President) (4) 10. National officer (5) 11. Chapter represented at: National Leadership Conference (3) Regional Fall Workshop (3) National Fall Leadership Conference (3) Regional Spring Conference (3) State Leadership Conference (3) 12. Planned Public Relations Program, November 15 (5) 13. Article printed in TBL or posted on fbla-‐pbl.org (2) 14. Program of Work in on time, November 1(2) 15. Evaluation Report in on time, May 15 (2) 16. State Leadership Conference registration in on time (1) 17. Virginia FBLA-‐PBL Foundation, Inc.: Contribution up to $100 (2) Bronze Membership and above (minimum of $100) (10) Life Membership (10 points annually) Seeking Silver (10 bonus points) 18. Membership: Increased Membership (1) High Five (5) New Members (2) Hang Ten (10) New Members (4) 19. Business Achievement Awards: (Chapters with fewer than 50 members have weighted points at 1.25) Each member reaching Future Level (1) Each member reaching Business Level (4) Each member reaching Leader Level (7) Each member reaching America Level (10) 20. 3D ANIMATION Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 21. ACCOUNTING I Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 22. ACCOUNTING II Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 23. ADVERTISING Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 23. AMERICAN ENTERPRISE PROJECT State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 24. BANKING & FINANCIAL SYSTEMS Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 25. BUSINESS CALCULATIONS Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5)

Points Received Activity 26. BUSINESS COMMUNICATION Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 27. BUSINESS ETHICS Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 28. BUSINESS FINANCIAL PLAN Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 29. BUSINESS LAW Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 30. BUSINESS PLAN Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 31. CLIENT SERVICE Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 41. CODING AND PROGRAMMING Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 32. COMMUNITY SERVICE PROJECT State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6),

Participant (5) National Recognition (5) 33. COMPUTER APPLICATIONS Regional: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Participant (3) State: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Fourth (3), Fifth (2) National Recognition (5) 34. COMPUTER GAME & SIMULATION PROGRAMMING Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 35. COMPUTER PROBLEM SOLVING Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (2) National Recognition (5) 36. CYBER SECURITY Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 37. DATABASE DESIGN & APPLICATIONS Regional: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Participant (3) State: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Fourth (3), Fifth (2) National Recognition (5) 40. GRAPHIC DESIGN Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 41. DIGITAL VIDEO PRODUCTION Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5)

7 2016–2017

Points Received Activity 42. DOWELL J. HOWARD, ARTHUR L. WALKER, WALTER L. SHELL, MELVIN E. CAMPBELL, AND VBEA SCHOLARSHIPS State Winner (5), Alternate (3), Participant (2) 43. E-‐BUSINESS Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 44. ECONOMICS Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 45. ELECTRONIC CAREER PORTFOLIO Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 46. EMERGING BUSINESS ISSUES Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 47. ENTREPRENEURSHIP Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 48. FBLA PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 49. FUTURE BUSINESS LEADER Regional: First (7), Second 6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 50. GLOBAL BUSINESS Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 51. HEATH CARE ADMINISTRATION Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 52. HELP DESK Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 53. IMPROMPTU SPEAKING Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 54. INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 55. INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 56. INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS COMMUNICATION Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 57. INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS PRESENTATION Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 58. INTRODUCTION TO BUSINESS PROCEDURES Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5)

Points Received Activity 59. INTRODUCTION TO FINANCIAL MATH Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 60. INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 61. INTRODUCTION TO PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 62. JOB INTERVIEW Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 21. JOURNALISM Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 63. L. MARGUERITE CRUMLEY, FRANK MANNING PEELE, FOUNDATION’S SARAH LOWE THOMPSON SCHOLARSHIPS Regional: Finalist (4), Alternate (3), Participant (2) State Winner (5), Alternate (3) 64. LARGEST LOCAL CHAPTER MEMBERSHIP Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) 65. LIFESMARTS National Recognition (5) 66. LOCAL CHAPTER ANNUAL BUSINESS REPORT State: First (15), Second (14), Honorable Mention (12),

Participant (10) National Recognition (5) 67. MANAGEMENT DECISION MAKING Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 68. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 69. MARKETING Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 70. MICROSOFT OFFICE SPECIALIST (EXCEL AND WORD) _______ National Recognition (5) 71. MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth(6) National Recognition (5) 72. NETWORK DESIGN Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 73. NETWORKING CONCEPTS Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 21. ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5)

8 2016–2017

Points Received Activity 74. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEDURE Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (5) State: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Fourth (5), Fifth (4) National Recognition (5) 75. PARTNERSHIP WITH BUSINESS PROJECT State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6), Participant (5) National Recognition (5) 76. PERSONAL FINANCE Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 77. PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 78. PUBLIC SPEAKING I Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (5), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 79. PUBLIC SPEAKING II Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (4), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 39. PUBLICATION DESIGN Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 80. SALES PRESENTATION Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 81. SECURITIES & INVESTMENTS Regional: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Participant (2) State: First (5), Second (4), Third (3), Fourth (2), Fifth (1) National Recognition (5) 82. SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN Regional: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Participant (4) State: First (7), Second (6), Third (5), Fourth (4), Fifth (3) National Recognition (5) 83. SPREADSHEET APPLICATIONS Regional: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Participant (3) State: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Fourth (3), Fifth (2) National Recognition (5) 84. STATE SERVICE PROJECT—PROJECT ASK Financial Phase Local Chapter Contribution (10) Largest Regional Contribution (4 additional points) Largest State Contribution (3 additional points) Public Information Phase State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6),

Participant (5) 85. VIRTUAL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CHALLENGE National Recognition (5) 86. WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT Regional: First (8), Second (7), Third (6), Participant (3) State: First (10), Second (9), Third (8), Fourth (7), Fifth (6) National Recognition (5) 87. WHO’S WHO IN FBLA State Winner (5), Participant (2) National Recognition (5) 88. WORD PROCESSING Regional: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Participant (3) State: First (6), Second (5), Third (4), Fourth (3), Fifth (2) National Recognition (5)

9 2016–2017

3D Animation In this event, animation will be used to create a standalone video product. This event consists of a 3D animated video. The overview of design and development efforts will be presented to a panel of judges. The video should be no more than three (3) minutes, and copyright issues should be addressed in the credits of the film. 2017 Topic Many companies are required to protect the environment and “go green.” Use 3D animation in a promotional/marketing video to show the importance of going green as an important business sustainability step. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Procedure Region Competitors will submit a Statement of Assurance containing the URL (and any supporting documentation to the regional director by the date established annually. Submissions will be prejudged only at the regional level. State

• Student members, not advisers, must prepare a video. Video must be three (3) minutes long and must be uploaded as a URL. A Statement of Assurance is required as well.

• Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one (1) author must give the presentation at all conferences; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as winners must register for each conference.

• The presentation is designed to be an explanation of equipment used, software used, the development process, an overview of how copyright laws were addressed and challenges experienced during the process. The video should be shown to the judges.

• The individual or team must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g., set-‐up, speaking, and operating audiovisual equipment). Other chapter representatives may not provide assistance.

• Visual aids and samples related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience.

• Participants must bring a copy of the 3-‐minute video to show to the judges as well as a computer and projection unit. A screen, electricity, and equipment table will be provided.

• Teams will have seven (7) minutes to present and five (5) minutes to set up and remove the equipment.

• A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and at seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period.

10 2016–2017

Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 3 Fourth 4 Fifth 3

11 2016–2017

3D Animation Performance Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not Demonstrated

Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations

Exceeds Expectations

Points Earned

Development of Project Video successfully conveys the message outlined in the topic and does so in a way that captivates audience attention

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Information related to topic is accurate 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Animated Video Production and Elements Overall quality of animated video 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Graphics are appropriate and consistent throughout the video

0 1–6 7–13 14-‐20

Editing is seamless and does not seem fragmented 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Multiple animation techniques are utilized 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Video concludes with appropriate credits 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Logical flow of thoughts and seamless transitions 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Content Describes the pre-‐production process 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the scenario 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the production process 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the post-‐production process 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the software used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the techniques used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the hardware used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery Statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation more than seven (7) minutes. Time:

Dress Code Penalty Deduct five (5) points when dress code is not followed.

Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow guidelines.

Total Points /200 max.

Prejudged Score /100 max.

Final Score (add total points and prejudged score) /300 max.

Name(s) School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

12 2016–2017

Accounting I The accurate keeping of financial records is an ongoing activity in all types of businesses. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have an understanding of and skill in basic accounting principles and procedures. Content The written objective test will focus on basic practices of accounting for the sole proprietorship, the partnership, and the corporation and may include questions on terminology, journalizing, income statement, balance sheet, account classification, worksheet, bank reconciliation, payroll, posting, and other items related to the basic accounting cycle. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. The participant must not have had more than one year of high school accounting instruction or its equivalent. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

13 2016–2017

Accounting II The accurate keeping of financial records is a vital ongoing activity in all types of businesses. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have demonstrated an understanding of and skill in accounting principles and procedures as applied to sole proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. Content The written objective test will focus on the principles and practices of accounting for the sole proprietorship, the partnership, and the corporation. The test may include questions on accounts receivable and accounts payable, financial statements, worksheet, account classification, bank reconciliation, income tax, payroll, inventory, purchases, sales, plant assets, depreciation, departmentalized accounting, partnerships, and corporate accounting. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. The participant should have had more than one year of high school accounting instruction or its equivalent. Procedure An objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at the regional level and 60 minutes at the state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

14 2016–2017

Advertising Content This event consists of a 50�minute test at the regional level and a 60-‐minute test administered during the State Leadership Conference (SLC). Objective Test. The online objective test may include questions on personal selling & sales promotion, traditional & alternative advertising media, consumer behavior, basic marketing functions, branding & positioning, economy, advertising plan, legal & ethical issues, diversity & multicultural market, public relations, creation of advertisement, consumer�oriented advertising, financial planning, communication, consumer purchase classifications, target market, market segmentation, product development, product life cycle, price planning, channels of distribution, marketing research, effective advertising & promotional messages, budget, financing advertising campaigns, demographics, history & influences, advertising industry & careers, supply chain management, distribution logistics, Internet, self�regulation, careers, advertising workplace, leadership, career development & team building, risk management. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at the regional level and 60 minutes at the state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

15 2016–2017

Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

16 2016–2017

American Enterprise Project—Revised 2017 This event recognizes FBLA chapters that develop information/education programs within schools and/or communities, increasing understanding of and support for the American enterprise system. Content The project must promote an awareness of a facet of the American enterprise system within the school and/or community and be designed for chapter participation rather than individual participation. The event is not designed to raise money for the chapter; rather, the intent is to help members learn more about the economic system under which they live and then to share their expertise in some way with others inside and/or outside the school. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one report submission by the annual SLC due date. Regulations 1. The main emphasis of the project is to increase knowledge and awareness of the American enterprise

system. It cannot be fundraising. 2. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the regional director by the annual due date established for

conference submission. 3. Reports will not be returned to chapters. 4. The report must adhere to the following guidelines:

Report Contents • The report must include a table of contents. A title page, divider pages, and appendices are

optional. • The report must not exceed 15 pages, including the title page, table of contents, divider pages, and

appendices. Front covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8 ½" by 11". • The report may be single-‐ or double-‐spaced. • The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. Report Covers • Front covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the

event, and the year of competition. • Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit.

5. The report must be prepared by student members, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in an acceptable business style.

6. The report must describe activities of the local chapter that were conducted between the previous year’s State Leadership Conference and the current year’s regional conference.

7. One PDF copy of the report must be sent electronically to the state specialist by an exact date to be established annually.

17 2016–2017

Procedure The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. If information is not available for a particular criterion, a statement to that effect must be included in the report. The report must be similar to that of a business report with substantiated statements in a clear and concise format. Creativity through design and use of meaningful graphics is encouraged. No Internet access is provided. Judging Reports will be prejudged according to the following rating sheet. Chapters receiving the top ten report scores will present at the State Leadership Conference. Up to three (3) members from each local chapter will give a seven-‐ (7) minute oral abstract of the project. Performance Guidelines

• Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment or presentation items. Screen, table, and power will be provided; the chapter must provide all other equipment for the presentation.

• Visual aids and samples related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges.

• The individual or team members must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g., speaking, setup, operating audiovisual equipment). Other representatives of the chapter may not provide assistance.

• All individual or team members are expected to actively participate in the performance. • Individuals or teams will have seven (7) minutes to describe the project and the results obtained. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes. When the presentation

is finished, the timekeeper will record the time used, noting a deduction of five (5) points for any time more than seven (7) minutes.

• Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final.

Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 8 State: First 10 Second 7 Second 9 Third 6 Third 8 Participant 5 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 National Recognition 5

18 2016–2017

American Enterprise Project Report Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Purpose of project • Project designed specifically to promote local

understanding of and support for the American Enterprise system

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Research into school and/or community needs 0 1–2 3–4 5 Planning and development of project 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Implementation of project 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Evaluation and results • Benefits to and impact on the school and/or

community

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Format

Clear and concise presentation with logical arrangement of information following the rating sheet categories

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional report design appropriate for audience 0 1–2 3–4 5 Correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and acceptable business style

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max. Penalty Points Check and deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): missing cover information missing table of contents more than fifteen (15) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /100 max. School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

19 2016–2017

American Enterprise Project Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Explanation

Describes project development and strategies used to implement project 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Describes research into school or community needs 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Appropriate level of member involvement in project 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Degree of impact on the community and its citizens 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Evidence of publicity received 0 1–2 3–4 5 Student evaluation of project effectiveness 0 1–2 3–4 5 Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, assertiveness, and good voice projection 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates ability to effectively answer questions 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation more than seven (7) minutes. Time:




Report Score /100 max.

Final Score (add total points and report score) /200 max. School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

20 2016–2017

Banking & Financial Systems Understanding how financial institutions operate is important to successful business ownership and management, as well as to personal financial success. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have an understanding of and skills in the general operations of the various components of the financial services sector. Content This event is composed of two (2) parts: an objective test and a decision-‐making problem with the decision presented and defended before a panel of judges (at SLC only). Objective Test (Regional and State Levels) The objective test may include questions on business and its environment, forms of business ownership and the law, ethics and social responsibility, information and communication systems, planning and strategic management, financial management, human resource management, and careers. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners will take the objective test online prior to the State Leadership Conference. Finalists for the performance portion of the event will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. Case Study (State Level Only) A case study will be given consisting of a problem or scenario encountered in the banking or financial business community. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team composed of two (2) or three (3) members. One team member may have entered this event at a previous National Conference. Team members must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Region

Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Team members will take the objective test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event.

State

Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference on the previously listed Content. The team members will take the test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Eight teams with the highest scores on this written test will be scheduled for a performance portion (case study). Finalist will be posted at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference.

21 2016–2017

Oral Presentation. Members of the eight (8) participating finalist teams will meet for instructions and time assignments thirty (30) minutes before the first performance is scheduled to begin. Twenty (20) minutes before performance, each team will receive the problem. Two 4" by 6" note cards will be provided for each participant and may be used during the preparation and performance of the oral segment of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. No reference materials, visual aids, or computer equipment may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance.

The team has up to seven (7) minutes to present the solution to the judges. All team members must be involved. The team members will be allowed to use their note cards during the interaction. This is a role-‐play event. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes.

Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

22 2016–2017

Banking & Financial Systems Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Problem is understood and well-‐defined. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Alternatives are recognized with pros and cons stated and evaluated.

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Logical solution is selected with positive and negative aspects of its implementation given

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Demonstrates knowledge and understanding of banking and financial systems concepts

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language is used.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Team members demonstrate self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection.

0 1–2 3–4 5

Team members participate actively during the presentation.

0 1–2 3–4 5

Team demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.



Final Score /100 max.

Objective Test Score (To be used in the event of a tie)

Names School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

23 2016–2017

Business Calculations Acquiring a high level of mathematics skill to solve Business and Information Technology problems is a challenge for all prospective Business and Information Technology employees. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have an understanding of mathematical functions in Business and Information Technology applications. Content The written objective test will consist of items related to business math, interest rates, payroll, taxes, bank records, mark-‐ups, discounts, consumer credit, and insurance. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

24 2016–2017

Business Communication Learning to communicate in a manner that is clearly understood by the receiver of the message is a major task of all business people. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who work toward improving their business communication skills of writing, speaking, and listening. Content The written objective test may include grammar, word definition and usage, proofreading, spelling, punctuation, numbers, and capitalization. Listening techniques and basic verbal and nonverbal communication concepts may be included. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

25 2016–2017

Business Ethics—Revised 2017 Ethical decision-‐making is essential in the business world and the workplace. This team event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate the ability to present solutions to ethical situations encountered in the business world and the workplace. Content Participants will be given a case study involving making ethical business decisions in the business world or in the workplace. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) individual or team composed of two (2) to three (3) members. Participants must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. Each team must be composed of two to three (2–3) members. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior State or National Leadership Conference. First-‐place regional winners will participate at the state level. Procedure Topic for 2017 Conferences: Research the ethical issues of social media platform checks in relation to employment. Guidelines

• Participants must research case study prior to the conference and be prepared to present their findings and solutions.

• Student members (not advisers) must prepare their presentation. Facts and data must be cited and secured from quality sources (peer review documents, legal documents, etc.).

• One (1) member must introduce the team and describe the ethical situation. • All team members must participate in the presentation. • Teams are permitted to bring prepared notes. • Books, other bound materials, props, and equipment are prohibited.

Region All team members must participate in the presentation. The team will have seven (7) minutes to present their case; a timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. A five-‐ (5-‐) point deduction will be made for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period. State First-‐place regional winners will participate at the State Leadership Conference. The order of performance will be drawn at random by an impartial person in the event office. One member should introduce the team and describe the ethical situation. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period.

26 2016–2017

Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of five (5) awards will be presented at the State Leadership Conference. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

27 2016–2017

Business Ethics Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Situation is understood and effectively defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Ethical dimensions of the problem are clearly defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Position is clearly stated. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Effective ethical solution is offered. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Quality of research 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Delivery

Statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time:






28 2016–2017

Business Financial Plan—Revised 2017 Business financial planning is paramount to the success of any business enterprise. This event is designed to recognize FBLA members who possess the knowledge and skills needed to establish and develop a complete financial plan for a business venture. The financial plan requesting a loan from a financial institution must be economically and financially sound with a realistic time frame. In addition to learning and applying financial business decision-‐making skills, team participants develop business contacts, implement written and oral skills, and develop familiarity with procedures of financial institutions. Content 2017 Topic You are planning to open a Family Entertainment Center (FEC) in a city with a population of approximately 200,000. You will lease an existing 30,000 square foot building that is currently empty with nothing but four outside walls in an area that is already properly zoned for your business venture. You can design your FEC as you wish, but it must be completely indoors and include an arcade and food. You will also be offering party packages to your customers. You will need to name your FEC, create the theme, and design the floor plan for needed construction/renovation. You will need to purchase equipment, furnishings, and inventory for your decided launch date. You will need to determine hours of operation, decide staffing requirements, and create marketing and advertising plans. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one report created by an individual or team of two (2) or three (3) members from active local chapters. Participants must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. The project must not have been submitted for a previous National Leadership Conference. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior NLC. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the state submission site by the date established annually by the state specialist. Regulations 1. The report must adhere to the following guidelines:

Report Contents • A one-‐page description of the plan should be the first page of the report (not included in page

count). • There should be a table of contents with page numbers. • Follow the RATING SHEET sequence in writing the report. If information is not available for a

particular criterion, include a statement to that effect in the report. • Pages are numbered and must be on 8½" by 11". • Reports must not exceed 15 pages excluding the front cover and the description. (A title page,

divider pages, and appendices are optional and must be included in the page count.) Report Covers • Report covers are not counted against the page limit and may contain other information.

29 2016–2017

• Front cover contains the following information: name of student(s), name of school, state, name of the event, and year.

2. The report must be prepared by student member(s), not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in an acceptable business style.

3. The project must describe a proposed business venture. If the student(s) have already launched the business idea, it must not have been in operation for more than twelve (12) months prior to the National Leadership Conference. A report must not be submitted that evaluates an ongoing business venture.

5. Reports will not be returned to the chapter. 6. Internet access is not provided. Judging Reports and Performance Reports will be judged at the state level. Reports will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. The schools with the top ten (10) pre-‐judged scores will be notified prior to the SLC to participate in the performance portion of the event. Performance Guidelines






• Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final.


30 2016–2017

Business Financial Plan Report Rating Sheet


Does Not Meet

Expectations

Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Report Content

Description of business, assumptions, and strategies to obtain loan (one page) 0 1–10 11–20 21–30

Company Description • Legal form of business • Company governance • Company location(s) • Long-‐ and short-‐term goals

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Operations and Management • Business facilities described • Management personnel identified • Workforce described (current and projected)

0 1–8 9–18 19–25

Target Market • Target market defined (size, growth potential, needs) • Risks and potential adverse results identified,

analyzed, and planned for

0 1–10 11–20 21–30

Financial Institution • Name and type of financial institution to which loan

application is being made 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Loan Request • Purpose of loan and amount requested • Itemized planned expenditures • Projections for future stability of company

0 1–10 11–20 21–30

Supporting Documents • Works cited page

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Format


0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and acceptable business style 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Subtotal /200 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): missing cover information missing table of contents more than fifteen (15) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /200 max.


31 2016–2017

Business Financial Plan Performance Rating Sheet (State Only)

Evaluation Item Not Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds Points Demonstrated Expectations Expectations Expectations Earned

Content

Description of the company and workforce (current & projected) 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Description of the financial plan and strategies to obtain loan 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Underlying assumptions explained and supported 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Risks and potential adverse results identified, analyzed, and planned for your target market

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Purpose of loan and amount requested and projections for future stability of company

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection 0 1–3 4–7 8–10


Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time: Dress Code Penalty Deduct five (5) points when dress code is not followed. Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow guidelines. Total Points /100 max. Report Score /200 max. Final Score (add total points and report score) /300 max. Name(s) School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

32 2016–2017

Business Law This event provides recognition for FBLA members who are familiar with specific legal areas that most commonly affect personal and business relationships. Content The written objective test may consist of both objective questions and case problems. Questions may address commonly recognized areas of business law, including contracts, sales, bailment, agency, business organization, bankruptcy, insurance, trade regulations, product liability, wills, consumer protection, negotiable instruments, and torts. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

33 2016–2017

Business Plan—Revised 2017 A business plan is an effective tool for evaluating, organizing, and selling a new business concept. A well-‐developed business plan can be a key component of a successful business start-‐up. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding and mastery of the process required to develop and implement a new business venture. Content An effective business plan should include the following information: Executive Summary. Provides a brief synopsis of the key points and strengths included in the plan. Convinces the reader to read the rest of the report. Company Description. Includes the basic details of the business. Provides an overview of the business, its location, and its legal structure and organization. Industry Analysis. Provides an analysis of the larger industry to which the business will belong. Analyzes key trends and players in the industry. Demonstrates an understanding and awareness of external business conditions. Target Market. Provides a brief overview of the nature and accessibility of the target market. Competitive Analysis. Includes an honest and complete analysis of the business’s competition. Demonstrates an understanding of the business’s relative strengths and weaknesses. Marketing Plan and Sales Strategy. Demonstrates how the business’s product or service will be marketed and sold. Includes both strategic and tactical elements of the marketing and sales approach. Operations. Provides an overview of the way the business will operate on a day-‐to-‐day basis. Includes production processes, physical facility reviews, utilization of technology, and processes followed to ensure delivery of products or services. Management and Organization. Describes the key participants in the new business venture. Identifies the human resources the business can draw upon either as part of the management team, employee pool, consultants, directors, or advisers and the role each will play in the business’s development. Discusses compensation and incentives and details decision-‐making processes. Long-‐Term Development. Gives a clear vision for where the business will be in three, five, or more years. Demonstrates an honest and complete evaluation of the business’s potential for success and failure. Identifies priorities for directing future business activities. Financials. Indicates the accounting methodology to be used by the business. Discusses any assumptions made in projecting future financial results. Presents projections honestly and conservatively. In addition, many business plans include copies of key supporting documents in an appendix. Examples of these types of documents might include letters of intent or advance contracts, product technical descriptions, illustrations, and endorsements.

34 2016–2017

Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one report. The project may be authored either by an individual member or by a team of two (2) or three (3) members. The project must be authored by student members. The project must not have been submitted for a previous State Leadership Conference. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior NLC. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the SLC submission site by the date established annually by the state specialist. Regulations 1. The report must adhere to the following guidelines:



appendices. Front covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8½" by 11". • The report may be single-‐ or double-‐spaced. • The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. Report Covers • Front covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the

event, and the year in which the report is entered. • Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit.

2. The report must be prepared by student member(s), not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in an acceptable business style.

3. The project must describe a proposed business venture. If the student(s) have already launched the business idea, it must not have been in operation for more than twelve (12) months prior to the National Leadership Conference. A report must not be submitted that evaluates an ongoing business venture.

4. One copy of the report must be uploaded in PDF format to the State Conference Upload site by an exact date to be established annually.

5. Reports will not be returned to chapters. Procedure Reports Reports will be judged at the state level. Reports will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. The schools with the top ten (10) pre-‐judged scores will be notified prior to the SLC to participate in the performance portion of the event. Performance Guidelines

• Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment or presentation items. The chapter must provide all equipment for the presentation.

• A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Deductions will be made for

35 2016–2017

presentations over seven (7) minutes. • Following the presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer session. • Visual aids and samples related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the

judges or audience. • The individual or team members must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g., speaking,

setup, operating audiovisual equipment). Other representatives of the chapter may not provide assistance.

• Internet access is not provided. Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number will be five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 8 State: First 10 Second 7 Second 9 Third 6 Third 8 Participant 5 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 National Recognition 5

36 2016–2017

Business Plan Report Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Executive Summary • Convinces reader that business concept is sound

and has a reasonable chance of success • Is concise and effectively written.

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Company Description • Legal form of business • Effective date of business • Company mission statement/vision • Company governance • Company location(s) • Immediate development goals • Overview of company’s financial status

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Industry Analysis • Description of industry (size, growth rates, nature

of competition, history) • Trends and strategic opportunities within industry

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Target Market • Target market defined (size, growth potential,

needs) • Effective analysis of market’s potential, current

patterns, and sensitivities

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Competition • Key competitors identified • Effective analysis of competitors’ strengths and

weaknesses • Potential future competitors • Barriers to entry for new competitors identified

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Marketing Plan and Sales Strategy • Key message to be communicated identified • Options for message delivery identified and

analyzed including Web process • Sales procedures and methods defined

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Operations • Business facilities described • Production plan defined and analyzed • Workforce plan defined and analyzed • Impact of technology

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

37 2016–2017

Business Plan Report Rating Sheet (Cont.)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Management and Organization • Key employees/principals identified and described • Board of directors, advisory committee, consultants,

and other human resources identified and described • Plan for identifying, recruiting, and securing key

participants described • Compensation and incentives plan

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Long-term Development • Goals for three-, five- or more years are

identified and documented Risks and potential adverse results identified and analyzed

• Strategy in place to take business toward long-term goals

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Financials • Type of accounting system to be used is identified • Financial projections are included and • reasonable • 1st year monthly cash flow • 1st year monthly income statement • Yearly income statements for years 1, 3 & 5 • Financial assumptions clearly identified

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Supporting Documents • May include works cited page, certifications, licenses,

tax requirements, codes, technical descriptions, advance contracts, endorsements, etc.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Report Format


0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professionally written presentation appropriate to audience 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /200 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): missing cover information missing table of contents more than thirty (30) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /200 max.


38 2016–2017

Business Plan Performance Rating Sheet (State Only)

Evaluation Item Not Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds Points Demonstrated Expectations Expectations Expectations Earned

Content

Description of business concept and company profile 0 1–2 3–4 5 Marketing aspects of business are thoroughly covered 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Description of operations and management plans 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Financial documents and projections are reasonably easy to understand 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Risks are anticipated, analyzed, and planned for 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Long-‐term goals are identified and reasonable 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection 0 1–2 3–4 5

All team members actively participate in the presentation 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions regarding business start-‐up logistics 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time: Dress Code Penalty Deduct five (5) points when dress code is not followed. Total Points /100 max. Report Score /200 max. Final Score (add total points and report score) /300 max. Name(s) School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

39 2016–2017

Client Service This event provides members with an opportunity to develop and demonstrate skills in interacting with internal and external clients to provide an outstanding client service experience. The client service consultant engages clients in conversations regarding products, handles inquiries, solves problems, and uncovers opportunities for additional assistance. Participants develop speaking ability and poise through presentation as well as critical-‐thinking skills. Content This event consists of an individual interactive simulation related to client service. Eligibility Participant must be a member of an active local chapter and on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference is not eligible. The first-‐place regional winners will participate at the State Leadership Conference. Procedure Regional and State Individuals should report twenty (20) minutes before their performance to receive instructions. Ten (10) minutes before the performance, each participant will receive the scenario. Two (2) 4" x 6" note cards will be provided for each participant and may be used during the preparation and performance of the case. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. Note cards will be collected following the presentation. No reference materials, visual aids, or electronic devices may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance. The participant has five (5) minutes to interact with a panel of judges and demonstrate how he/she would solve the problem. The judges will play the role of the second party in the presentation; refer to the case for specifics. A timekeeper will stand at four (4) minutes and again at five (5) minutes. Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of five (5) awards will be presented at the State Leadership Conference.

40 2016–2017


41 2016–2017

Client Service Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Scenario is understood and well-‐defined 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Participant’s position is clearly stated 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Effective solution is offered 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Delivery

Statements well-‐organized and clearly stated 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Participant displays empathy/diplomacy when responding to the situation 0 1–2 3–4 5



Participant actively interacts with judges 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.




Name School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

42 2016–2017

Coding and Programming Certain types of accounting processes require that each record in the file be processed. Desktop Application Programming focuses on these procedural style processing systems. This event tests the programmer’s skill in designing a useful, efficient, and effective program in the area described below. Content 2017 Topic Develop a database program to manage the general operations of a Family Entertainment Center (FEC). Give the FEC a name. The program must allow the user to complete at minimum the following tasks: • Enter/view/edit a list of employees • Create/edit a weekly work schedule for employees • Generate/print weekly schedule reports • Enter attendance of customers • Enter/track, generate, and print report(s) showing customer attendance by time of day (AM/PM) and

day of week

Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Region—Prejudged At the regional level, only a prejudged component of the event will be administered. Regional Directors will designate a due date for submissions. First place winners are eligible for state competition. Entries must be submitted with a Statement of Assurance and may be saved to a properly labeled CD, DVD, or USB drive. The solution must run stand-‐alone with no programming errors. The judge will copy the contents of the submission to C:\NLCDesktop\. The program must be designed so that the program will run when copied to a hard drive with this path. The judge will use a file with the same name and layout as given in the problem but with different data. Points will be deducted for any logical errors, and entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. Programs must be accompanied by a readme file noting software used; name(s) of participants, school, and region; source of information; and instructions on running the program. Programs should run on a computer running Windows XP or higher. CD/DVDs should be free of viruses/malware. State—Prejudged and Performance Regional Directors will forward their first-‐place entry for SLC pre-‐judging. Regional first place winners will also compete in the presentation component of this event. Presentation of the entry must be conducted by competitors who authored the event. Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience. Competitors will have five (5) minutes to set up and remove equipment; a screen, equipment table and power cord will be provided. Students will have seven minutes for their presentation. A time-‐keeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Points will be deducted for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Following the presentation, the judges will conduct a three (3) minutes questions and answer session.

43 2016–2017

Judging Submissions will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 8 State: First 10 Second 7 Second 9 Third 6 Third 8 Participant 5 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 National Recognition 5

44 2016–2017

Coding and Programming Production Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Program Readability and Style

Appropriate identifiers used for variables, constants, arrays, objects, etc. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Commentary provided line-‐by-‐line and/or section is readable, useful, and complete. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

General program documentation is readable, useful, and complete (i.e., execution instructions, system requirements, etc.).

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Program Structure and Content

Program is concise and does not contain unnecessary complexity or repetitive blocks of code (uses functions and sub routines as necessary).

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Appropriate data types are used for data storage to avoid drain on system resources. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Program follows a logical sequence to accomplish required tasks (unusual approaches are well documented).

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Results

Program produces desired results (free of logic errors). 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Program handles user and/or data input errors well (coded to avoid run-‐time errors). 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Resulting output/feedback (onscreen and/or printed reports, alert/error messages, etc) were useful. 0 1–10 11–20 21–30

Usability

Program provides instructions or help menu for user assistance. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

User is able to navigate the program intuitively using a logical sequence (appropriate tab order for user input, asks for input in a logical sequence, etc.).

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Program interface, feedback, reports, etc. are free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Program aesthetics maintain user interest. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /200 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to guidelines. Statement of Assurance not received Total Points /200 max.


45 2016–2017

Coding and Programming Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Description of the problem 0 1–2 3–4 5

Description of the planning process used to design the program 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Description of program documentation 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Description of input/output and program parameters 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Description of how the program flows 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Description of program structures 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Description of the usefulness of the program 0 1–2 3–4 5

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–2 3–4 5



Subtotal /100 max.








46 2016–2017

Community Service Project This event recognizes FBLA chapters that successfully implement community service projects to serve the citizens of the community. Content Reports must describe a chapter project that serves the community. The project must be in the interest of the community and be designed for chapter participation rather than individual participation. The report should focus on the details of one project rather than cataloging all service activities conducted by the chapter. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one report. This is a state and national event only. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the state submission site by the annual SLC due date, established annually. Regulations 1. The report must adhere to the following guidelines:



appendices. Front covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8½" by 11". • Pages must not be laminated or in sheet protectors. • The report may be single-‐ or double-‐spaced. Report Covers • Front covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the

event, and the year in which the event is entered. • Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit.

2. The report must be prepared by student members, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants

to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in an acceptable business style.

3. The report must describe activities of the local chapter that were conducted between the previous year’s State Leadership Conference and the current year’s State Leadership Conference.

4. A PDF of the report must be uploaded on the State Conference Report Submission Site by the annually established state conference deadline date.

5. Reports will not be returned to chapters. Procedure The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. If information is not available for a particular criterion, a statement to that effect must be included in the report. The report must be similar to that of a business report with substantiated statements in a clear and concise format.

47 2016–2017

Judging Performance Guidelines






• Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Internet access will not be provided.

Reports will be prejudged according to the following rating sheet. Chapters receiving the top ten report scores will present at the State Leadership Conference. Up to three (3) members from each local chapter will give a seven (7)-‐minute oral abstract of the project. Creativity through design and use of meaningful graphics is encouraged. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number will be five (5) at the state level. The first-‐place award is sponsored by the Virginia Business Education Association. Points for Participation State: First 10 Second 9 Third 8 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 Participant 5 National Recognition 5

48 2016–2017

Community Service Project Report Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Purpose of project • Statement of project goals • Service to the community and its citizens

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Planning and development of project 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Implementation of project 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Impact and benefits to the community 0 1–8 9–18 19–25 Evidence of publicity 0 1–2 3–4 5 Report Format


0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional report and design appropriate to audience 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): missing cover information missing table of contents more than fifteen (15) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /100 max.

School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

49 2016–2017

Community Service Project Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Description of project development and strategies used to implement project 0 1–8 9–18 19–25

Appropriate level of chapter member involvement in the project 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Degree of impact on the community and its citizens 0 1–7 8–15 16–20

Evidence of publicity received 0 1–2 3–4 5 Effective student evaluation of project 0 1–2 3–4 5 Delivery




Subtotal /100 max.








50 2016–2017

Computer Applications Knowledge of computer applications is a necessity in today’s high-‐tech Business and Information Technology world. Employees must be able to apply various computer applications in a Business and Information Technology environment. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who can most efficiently demonstrate computer application skills. Chapters may also elect to use voice recognition programs for their skill event competitions. However, the chapter must supply the voice recognition software, a laptop computer, and all peripherals. Content Participants should be prepared to complete problems in the following areas: Word Processing. Participants will be responsible for the production of letters, memorandums, tables, reports, or any other types of word processing problems. Documents should adhere to the national format guide. Database. Participants will be responsible for creating a database and applying various functions such as searching and cloning. Spreadsheets. Participants will be responsible for completing the spreadsheet grid and applying various functions such as move, combine, and format. In addition, students will be responsible for creating and applying formulas. Graphics. Participants will be responsible for completing various graphics, including bar, line, pie, exploded pie, or stacked bar. Presentation. Participants will be responsible for preparing text slides with graphics. In addition, participants will be tested on their understanding and mastery of basic computer terminology and concepts, document formatting rules, grammar, punctuation, spelling, proofreading, and related computer application knowledge. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Region At the regional level, only a performance test will be administered. A total of 2 hours will be allowed for this test with additional time for general directions and equipment setup. Participants will complete problems in each of the following areas: word processing, database, spreadsheets, and graphics. Problems are weighted according to difficulty and may be completed in any order. Participants will be responsible for formatting each problem and must recognize the necessity for accurate proofreading. Results will be based on accuracy of printed copy. Word-‐division manuals and dictionaries may be used as reference materials.

51 2016–2017

State The performance portion of this event will be administered at the regional level prior to the State Leadership Conference. A total of 2 hours will be allowed with additional time for general directions and equipment setup. Participants will complete problems in each of the following areas: word processing, database, spreadsheets, and graphics. Problems are weighted according to difficulty and may be completed in any order. Participants will be responsible for formatting each problem and must recognize the necessity for accurate proofreading. Word-‐division manuals and dictionaries may be used as reference materials. A 60-‐minute written objective test will be administered at the State Leadership Conference based on previously written content and basic skills knowledge. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers.

Judging The state objective test will be machine-‐scored and will constitute 15 percent of the final score. Judging of the performance test will be based on accuracy of printed copy, including formatting, appearance, and formulas (if applicable). Documents will be evaluated by a panel of judges. Judges will use the national format guide to evaluate materials. All decisions of the judges are final. At the state level, the performance portion of this event will constitute 85 percent of the final score. Ties will be broken based on the scores associated with the objective test portion of the event. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 6 State: First 6 Second 5 Second 5 Third 4 Third 4 Participant 3 Fourth 3 Fifth 2 National Recognition 5 See Format Guide.

52 2016–2017

Computer Game & Simulation Programming Interactive computer games and simulations have achieved broad acceptance and implementation in a wide variety of business and educational disciplines. Buried within many of these programs is a message that advances the player’s experience from simple entertainment to edutainment. This event tests the programmer’s skill in designing a functional interactive simulation/game that will both entertain and educate/inform the player. Eligibility Each chapter may enter one (1) participant or a team of two (2) to three (3) who have been recorded as members having paid dues from an active local chapter by March 1 of the current school year. First-‐place regional winners will advance to the State Leadership Conference. No more than one (1) member on the team may have competed in this event at a previous state or national conference. Overview 2017 Topic Create a 1980s style video arcade game. The game must: • include at least three (3) levels of play • include three (3) lives/chances • keep score • run on a PC using Windows 7 or newer • be a standalone executable program • be virus and malware free • contain a celebratory event and conclusion • include a leaderboard • include audio and visual indicator that the game has been completed • run solely by keyboard stroke • qualify for a maximum ESRB rating of E10+ Program Guidelines Prejudged Program—Regional and State

• The participant may choose any programming language or game/animation engine to create a stand-‐alone executable program that will display creativity, programming skill, and convey the message of the topic.

• The program must be submitted on a CD, DVD, or USB drive (labeled with name and school) along with a Statement of Assurance.

• The program must have the following characteristics: • Program must contain a minimum of five missions/tasks/levels to be completed before winning

or completing the game. • Program must be graphical in nature, not text based. • Program must include an initial title page with the game title, user interface control instructions,

and active buttons for Play and Quit. • Program must include a quit command programmed to the Escape key. This is needed if the player

wants to end the game before completing. • All data and programs should be contained in a master folder named REGION_SCHOOL where your

region and school are listed in that folder name format. Outside of the master folder, create a

53 2016–2017

shortcut to the executable file. If the program requires a runtime player, create a shortcut outside the master folder to launch the runtime player installer.

• Executable object, data, or support files needed to run the executable file, and files showing the programming code (can be text or flowchart files that can be opened using Microsoft Office 2007), should be submitted with a Statement of Assurance. Label the media with the school, participant name, region, and event.

• Program must run on Windows XP or higher computer. • Data must be free of viruses/malware. Any entry with contaminated data will not be judged. • Program produced for this event must be prepared by the participant without help.

Project Competencies

• Program addresses the topic and is appropriate for the audience. • Required information is effectively communicated. • User interface is intuitive and responsive to program operations. • Navigation is logical and designed to lead the player to the intended objective. • Program demonstrates a finished and well-‐tuned product free of artifacts and glitches. • Game play incorporates both entertainment and edutainment play within topic specifications. • Game world graphics, text treatment, and special effects show creativity and cohesiveness of design. • Artistry, character, overall layout, color choice, and design are creative and appealing to the target

audience. • Program contains some element of skill, chance, competition, or random actions that will inspire

replay more than once. • Player interactions with other characters, objects, obstacles, and iconic graphics are appropriate to

the topic and create a feeling of immersion within the game world. • Storyline is sufficient to engage player and communicate a clear thought process and an intended,

planned direction with formulation and execution of a firm idea. • Player tasks are non-‐trivial and receive appropriate rewards. • Copyright laws are followed. Performance—State Only Regional first-‐place winners will present at the State Leadership Conference. Presentation of the entry must be conducted by competitors who authored the event. Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience. Competitors will have five (5) minutes to set up and remove equipment; a screen, equipment table and power cord will be provided. Students will have seven minutes for their presentation. A time-‐keeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Points will be deducted for presentations more than 7 minutes. Following the presentation, the judges will conduct a three (3) minutes questions and answer session.

Judging

All judges’ decisions are final.

Awards

The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

54 2016–2017

Points for Participation

Regional: First 8 State: First 10 Second 7 Second 9 Third 6 Third 8 Participant 5 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 National Recognition 5

55 2016–2017

Computer Game & Simulation Programming Production Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not

Demonstrated Does Not Meet Expectations

Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Program Usability and Support

Storage media, uploaded folder, and shortcuts are formatted properly. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Instructions are clear and executable; launches from shortcut without modification. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Game Play Evaluation

Quality of Rules—rules are presented well and player knows what to do. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

User Interface—game controls are easy to use without much explanation. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Navigation—the player can get to the end of game and knows how to get there. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Performance—there are no errors, bugs, or glitches. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Play—game is challenging; the game can be completed. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Artistry—color, backgrounds, characters, sounds are attractive and visible. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Player Interactions—player participates in the story and the actions are consistent with the concept. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Immersion—player feels connected to the gameplay and is not distracted or removed from interaction. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Rewards—player is rewarded properly for taking game risks. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Game Concept & Design Evaluation

Fully addresses concept and topic. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Game play and graphics are appropriate for concept and age group. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Incorporates entertainment and education elements. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Title slide is attractive with working direction, quit, and start buttons. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Contains all levels required. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Errors did not crash game or prevent continuing game play. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Code is well written and logically designed. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Code or game engine events are well commented to explain logic used and reason for a block of code. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for failure to report guidelines. Statement of Assurance not received Total Points /200 max.


56 2016–2017

Computer Game & Simulation Programming Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the topic, problem, and challenges 0 1–2 3–4 5

Describes the planning process used to design the game through planning documents such as storyboards, flowcharts, etc.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes design software selection and why these were most appropriate to the task 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the user interface (input/output parameters) and why this applies best for this audience

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes how the game flows from starting point to victory and what is needed to win 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Describes user interactions and how these actions are entertaining, educational, and engaging to the audience

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Describes the program modules, structure, and commenting 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes the usefulness of the program in meeting the educational goal of the topic 0 1–2 3–4 5

Delivery




Subtotal /100 max.






Final Score (add total points and prejudged score.) /300 max.


57 2016–2017

Computer Problem Solving Having a broad base of knowledge and competencies in core hardware and operating system technologies including installation, configuration, diagnostics, preventive maintenance, and basic networking is an important element for today’s computer savvy individual. Content The objective test may include questions on personal computer components, laptop and portable devices, operating systems, printers and scanners, network security, safety and environmental issues. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participant must furnish his/her own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

58 2016–2017

Cyber Security With the increased use of the Internet for browsing, researching, information gathering, and e-‐commerce, information and cyber security has become a growing concern for businesses throughout our global economy. This event recognizes FBLA members who understand security needs for technology. Content The objective test may include questions on firewalls, intrusion detection, network and physical security, cryptography, public key, authentication, computer attacks (virus, spam, spy ware, Trojans, hijackers, worms, etc.), e-‐mail security, disaster recovery, and forensics security. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

59 2016–2017

Database Design & Applications Databases are necessary to organize data and information in business. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate that they have acquired entry-‐level skills for understanding database usage and development in business. Content This event is composed of two (2) parts: an objective test and a school-‐site computer database application production test. Regional participants will take only the objective test portion of the event. Participants should be prepared in the basic organizational structure of a database; be able to create and develop multiple queries; set up relational databases; edit relationships; and develop reports including sorting and grouping, inserting graphics, creating headers and footers, and calculating data. On the state level, participants will be tested on their knowledge of data entry techniques, data definitions, query development, table relationships (including those that enforce referential integrity), form development, and report generation. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. State participants will take the 60-‐minute application production test as well. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Test will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

60 2016–2017


61 2016–2017

Digital Video Production Digital video has become a prominent and effective way to convey new ideas and products. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate the ability to create an effective video to present an idea to a specific audience. Content 2017 Conference Topic Create a promotional video for a new, member (subscription network such as Netflix or HBO) original TV series or movie. The rating should meet “G” requirements. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Procedures Regional Prejudged Project 1. Presentations must address the given topic. Student members, not advisers, must prepare

presentations. State and local advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the presentations are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are developed in an acceptable business style.

2. Entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. 3. Presentations should be at least two (2) and no more than four (4) minutes in length. 4. Videos must be uploaded as a URL. A Statement of Assurance is required. 5. The production may use any method to capture or create moving images. Cameras may include

traditional camcorders or mini-‐DVD format. 6. The description area of the video must contain copyright information as well as the name of the event,

state, names of participants, and school. 7. It is recommended that royalty-‐free music be used, but it still must be documented that the music is

royalty free. State Prejudged Project Same as Regional. Performance Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation at the SLC; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as state winners must register for the SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed.

• The presentation is an explanation of the digital video production. • The digital video should be shown to the judges. The presentation should include, but not be

limited to: sources used to research the topic; development and design process; use of different

62 2016–2017

video techniques; a list of equipment and software used; and copyright issues with pictures, music, or other items.

• Participants are responsible for bringing a copy of the project submitted to use in the onsite presentation.

• Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges. • Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment and or presentation items. The

participants must provide all equipment for the presentation. • Teams will have seven (7) minutes to describe the project. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period.

Judging Presentations will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 8 State: First 10 Second 7 Second 9 Third 6 Third 8 Participant 5 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 National Recognition 5

63 2016–2017

Digital Video Production Production Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Theme is fully and properly developed. Solution properly addresses assigned topic. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Elements included in presentation are suitable, appropriate, and directed toward a specific audience.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Copyright information is included in credits. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Presentation is clear and concise. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Effective use of technology 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 0 1–2 3–4 5 Presentation

Presentation shows creativity and originality. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Presentation includes an effective opening, body, and conclusion. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Transitions are effective and appealing. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Audio and visual elements are coordinated and complementary. 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Audio Editing • Good quality • Appropriate volume

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Proper Use of Video Technology • Video uses multiple camera angles. • Video is smooth and steady. • Video is in focus.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Titles and graphics enhance overall quality of presentation. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Presentation is effective at motivating audience to action. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation more than four (4) minutes. Time:

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to guidelines Statement of Assurance not received Final Score /200 max.


64 2016–2017

Digital Video Production Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Development of the topic in the presentation 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Use and the implementation of innovative technology 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Development and design process 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Use of the video 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Proper documentation of pictures, audio, etc. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery



Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions 0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /100 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time:







65 2016–2017

Dowell J. Howard Scholarship Arthur L. Walker Scholarship Walter L. Shell Scholarship

Melvin E. Campbell Scholarship Virginia Business Education Association Scholarship/Sarah Lowe

Thompson Award of Excellence Content These scholarships are named for Dowell J. Howard, a Director of Vocational Education who became State Superintendent of Public Instruction; Arthur L. Walker, first State Supervisor of Business Education in Virginia when FBLA was organized in 1950; Walter L. Shell, former Regional Director for the Virginia Tech Region; and Melvin E. Campbell, former Supervisor of Business Education, Department of Education. The Virginia Business Education Association (VBEA) began sponsoring a fifth scholarship in 1997. In 2001, the VBEA amended the scholarship name to include and honor Sarah Lowe Thompson, former FBLA-‐PBL Specialist. These scholarships are awarded annually to FBLA members to attend the Foundation’s Leadership Institute for Leaders. The award will be a $100 stipend. Eligibility Each local chapter may nominate one member for these scholarships. These are state events only. The applicant • must complete the Future Level of the Business Achievement Awards • must be a high school junior (rising senior) • must have been in FBLA at least one year prior to nomination • should have held some office or served in some capacity where leadership ability has been

demonstrated • must have a scholastic rating in the upper one-‐fourth of high school class • should show evidence of leadership qualities such as ability to assume and delegate responsibilities;

poise, tact, and initiative; pleasing personality and good personal habits; honesty, dependability, and an outstanding citizenship and character record

• must submit three copies of the official online application (Howard-‐Walker-‐Shell-‐Campbell-‐Thompson-‐-‐VBEA Scholarships Application) to the FBLA State Office by an exact date to be established annually.

Procedure Applicants will be assigned to two groups and will be interviewed for eight (8) minutes by a panel of judges at the State Leadership Conference. The application form and the interview will be the factors for determining the winners and alternates. Judging There will be a panel of judges for these events. All decisions of the judges are final.

66 2016–2017

Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number is 10. Points for Participation State: Winner 5 Alternate 3 Participant 2 The forms related to this competition can be found in Appendix F.

67 2016–2017

Dowell J. Howard Scholarship Arthur L. Walker Scholarship Walter L. Shell Scholarship

Melvin E. Campbell Scholarship Virginia Business Education Association Scholarship/

Sarah Lowe Thompson Award of Excellence Interview Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Personal Qualifications

FBLA activities 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Scholastic records 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Interview

Evidence of leadership ability 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Evidence of school and/or community involvement; evidence of goal setting/aspirations; poise and maturity; professional appearance

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Communication skills 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Application Materials

Clear and concise presentation of facts; neatness; completeness; correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Penalty Points Deduct up to ten (10) points for failure to follow the guidelines fully.



68 2016–2017

E-‐Business One critical element in a business’ success in today’s global market is the ability to sell products and services to the consumer via the Internet. This event recognizes FBLA members who have developed proficiency in the creation and design of Web commerce sites. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one (1) entry created by an individual or by a team of two (2) or three (3) members from active local chapters, on record in the national center has having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior NLC/SLC. First place regional winners will advance to the SLC. Procedure This event consists of one (1) part at the regional level: a prejudged project. A prejudged project should be developed based on the national topic listed. Regional Directors will forward the first-‐place regional winners’ entry to the state office. All state participants will compete in a performance to explain their website. 2017 Topic Create a site that would allow a platform for a digital yard sale to raise funds to attend NLC. The site must include a shopping cart and a place to donate funds for those not wishing to make a purchase. The items must be searchable. A contact form must be available. Procedure Prejudged Project (Regional and State)

• Student members, not advisers, must prepare projects. • If using a shopping cart, it doesn’t need to be active. • A Statement of Assurance form must be completed and submitted electronically. • The website must be available for viewing on the Internet at the time of judging. No changes can

be made to the website after the official entry date. Judging of the E-‐business site will take place before the RLC and SLC.

• Any photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used on the site must be supported by proper documentation and approvals indicated on the site. Members are expected to follow all applicable copyright laws. Use of templates must be identified.

• E-‐business sites should be designed to allow for viewing by as many different platforms as possible.

Performance (State Only) Presentation of the entry must be conducted by competitors who authored the event. Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience. Competitors will have five (5) minutes to set up and remove equipment; a screen, equipment table and power cord will be provided. Students will have seven minutes for their presentation. A time-‐keeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Points will be deducted for presentations more than7 minutes. Following the presentation, the judges will conduct a three (3) minutes questions and answer session.

69 2016–2017


70 2016–2017

E-‐Business Production Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Page Layout and Design Format is consistent and appropriate, projecting a good image of the company while maintaining a balance between design and functionality.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Graphic design shows creativity, originality, and supports topic. 0 1–3 6–10 11–15

Page elements are effective without being distracting. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Shopping Experience Catalog information is organized in a logical and meaningful manner. Navigation path allows customers to make purchasing decision easily.

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Product information is useful, informative, and adequate. If product images are used, they download quickly. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Site clearly explains shipping and handling procedures, return policies, and product or service guarantees. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Customer experience is quick and easy enough to bring the customer back and keep the customer from going to competitors.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Site allows customer to provide feedback/comments. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Shopping Cart Implementation Shopping cart is easy to use and understandable, and features are clearly explained. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Customer can easily add items to and delete items from the shopping cart. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Obvious navigation path to the cash register 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Customer can get back to shopping easily from shopping cart. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Order form is easy to understand and complete. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Adequate information is provided for confirmation or a successful transaction. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Technical Proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Site is free of broken links and error messages. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Site is compatible with multiple browsers and platforms. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Copyright laws have been followed, permissions are cited on the Web site, and the use of templates is identified at the bottom of the home page.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for not following guidelines.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for not submitting Statement of Assurance.



71 2016–2017

E-‐Business Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes development of the topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Demonstrates the customer’s shopping experience

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Explains the use and implementation of technology 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Explains the development and design process 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Copyright information is noted in credits 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10



0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.


Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow guidelines.






72 2016–2017

Economics This event provides recognition for FBLA members who can identify, understand, and apply economic principles to contemporary social, political, and ecological problems. Content The written objective test may include questions on economic principles related to the policies and goals of the United States economy and a comparison of the American economic system with other systems. Topics covered may include supply and demand, prices, profits, competition, government and taxes, labor relations, monetary and fiscal policy, types of businesses, investments, global business, and environmental issues. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

73 2016–2017

Electronic Career Portfolio An electronic career portfolio is a purposeful collection of work that tells the story of an applicant, including achievements, growth, vision, reflection, skills, experience, education, training, and career goals. It is a tool that gives employers a complete picture of who you are—your experiences, education, accomplishments—and what you have the potential to become—much more than just a letter of application and résumé can provide. Content Competencies for this event include written communication skills, organizational skills, creativity, career development, technology skills, multimedia, Internet use, use of scanners, self-‐assessment, and knowledge of employability skills and trends. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one portfolio. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. Guidelines The event is to be specific to the career goals and professional experiences that the student has completed; it is not a showcase of FBLA experiences.

• All information should reflect the student’s accomplishments and experiences that have actually occurred.

• The portfolio must include: a résumé and a career summary. The career summary should include career choice, description of career, skills and education required, and future job outlook (e.g., monetary, advancement).

• Sample materials also must be included in the portfolio. These samples must include, but are not limited to, the following:

o Career-‐Related Education: Describe career-‐related education that enhances employability. Include a summary of school activities, career research projects, application of business education, and/or related occupational skills and their relationship to job.

o Educational Enhancement: Describe educational opportunities that enhance employability. Include career opportunities development planning, summaries of job shadowing, internships, apprenticeships, informational interviews, community service projects, and products developed during these experiences.

o Examples of Special Skills: Includes up to fi ve (5) examples of special skills, talents, and/or abilities related to job and career goals. These may be in any format but must fi t within the dimensions of the portfolio. Audio and/or video recordings may be included in the portfolio.

Procedure Regional and State: Performance • Student members, not advisers, must prepare electronic career portfolios.

74 2016–2017

• Presentation is an explanation of the chosen career search and supporting materials. • Students may present their portfolio using a DVD, USB flash drive, or by accessing it via the Internet.

The competitor must supply all performance equipment; a screen will be provided. • Visual aids and samples related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the

judges or audience. • Participant must provide all the equipment for the presentation. Internet access will be provided. Five

(5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove the equipment. • All information should reflect the student’s accomplishments and experiences. No fictitious

information should be presented. • Portfolio must include: a résumé or data sheet and a career summary. The career summary should

include career choice, description of career, skills and education required, and future job outlook (e.g., monetary, advancement).

• Sample materials also must be included in the portfolio. • The individual has seven (7) minutes to present. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period.

Judging Electronic portfolios will be judged according to the rating sheet.


75 2016–2017

Electronic Career Portfolio Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content Résumé (Data Sheet) • Displays evidence of professional experience, career-‐

related experience, and leadership experience • Outlines any special certifications or training • Shares overview of academic success • Outlines community service

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Career research summary • The specific career targeted is clearly identified and

described—the portfolio must specifically be targeted towards a career

• Skills and education needed for the career are identified and outlined

• Money/salary and outlook for the career are identified • Evidence of research in career summary

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Sources of information cited pertaining to copyright standards 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Samples Career-‐Related Education • School activities • Career research project • Application of business education and/or related

occupational skills and their relationships to the job

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Educational Enhancement • Career opportunities noted • Evidence of career development planning • Summary of any job shadowing, internships, informational

interviews, or community service projects

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Examples of Special Skills • Includes up to five (5) examples of special skills and/or

abilities related to job and career goals 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery Statements well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10



Subtotal /100 max.






76 2016–2017

Emerging Business Issues This event provides FBLA members with an opportunity to develop and demonstrate skills in researching and presenting an emerging business issue. The event is based on team rather than individual participation. In addition to learning research skills, team participants develop speaking ability and poise through oral presentations. Content 2017 Topic In the ever-‐changing world of business communication and demand for instantaneous information, discuss the issues surrounding cloud computing in relation to storage, access, and security. Be prepared to argue the affirmative, that cloud computing would positively answer the demand for instantaneous information; and be prepared to argue the negative, that cloud computing is not the answer to instantaneous information. Eligibility Each chapter may enter one(1) individual or team. Participants must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. Each chapter may enter one (1) individual or team. Teams must be composed of two to three (2–3) members. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior State or National Leadership Conference. First-‐place regional winners advance to the State Leadership Conference. Regulations Each team’s presentation must be the result of its own independent work. Facts and working data may be secured from any source. The student members, not advisers, must prepare presentations. All members of the team must participate in the advance research of the topic and in the actual presentation. Teams will be permitted to bring prepared materials written/printed on white 8½ " x 11" paper, or notes written/printed on note cards, to the preparation and presentation areas. Procedure Region Each team will give both a pro and con argument. Each presentation may last no more than seven (7) minutes. Following each oral presentation, the judges may conduct a three (3) minute question-‐and-‐answer period during which the presenters should be prepared to defend their argument. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and at seven (7) minutes. Following each oral presentation, the judges may conduct a three (3) minute question-‐and-‐answer period during which the presenters should be prepared to defend their argument. State Each team will give both a pro and con argument. Each presentation may last no more than seven (7) minutes. Following each oral presentation, the judges may conduct a three (3) minute question-‐and-‐answer period during which the presenters should be prepared to defend their argument.

77 2016–2017

A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and at seven (7) minutes. Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of five (5) awards will be presented at the State Leadership Conference. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

78 2016–2017

Emerging Business Issues Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Understanding of issue/topic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Affirmative Argument

Flow and logic of content 0 1–2 3–4 5 Quality of evidence 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Persuasiveness 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Relevance of arguments 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Negative Argument

Flow and logic of content 0 1–2 3–4 5 Quality of evidence 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Persuasiveness 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Relevance of arguments 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery

Statements well-organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-confidence, poise, and good voice projection 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max.






79 2016–2017

Entrepreneurship To own and manage a business is the goal of many Americans. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate the knowledge and skills needed to establish and manage a business. This event is based on team rather than individual participation. In addition to learning and applying business decision-‐making skills, team participants develop speaking ability and poise through oral presentations. Content This event is composed of two parts: a written objective test (regional and state) and a decision-‐making problem (state only) with the decision presented and defended before a panel of judges. Objective Test—Regional and State The written objective test may include questions on a business plan, community/business relationships, legal issues, initial capital and credit, personnel management, financial management, marketing management, taxes, and government regulations. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners will take the state-‐level objective test prior to the State Leadership Conference. Case Study—State Only A maximum of five teams will be selected to present the decision-‐making problem based upon the teams making the highest scores on the objective test. The case study will consist of a decision-‐making problem encountered by entrepreneurs in one or more of the following areas: business planning, human relations, financial management, and marketing. All of the questions raised in the case must be addressed during the oral presentation. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team that may be composed of two (2) or three (3) members. The two (2) teams with the highest score will represent the region in the state event. Only one team member entering the regional/state event may have participated in this event at a previous National Leadership Conference. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Team members will take the objective test collaboratively. Each team will submit one answer sheet. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test will be administered online prior to the SLC. The team members will take the test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer. Eight teams with the highest scores on this preliminary test will be scheduled for a performance test (case study). Finalists for the performance portion of the event will be posted outside of conference

80 2016–2017

headquarters at the conclusion of the SLC opening session. Case Study. Members of the eight finalist teams will meet for instructions and time assignments twenty (20) minutes before each performance time; each team will receive an envelope containing three (3) copies of the case study. Two 4" x 6" note cards will be provided for each participant and may be used during the preparation and performance. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. Note cards will be collected following the presentation. No reference materials, visual aids, or electronic devices may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance. The team has seven (7) minutes to interact with the panel of judges and present a solution to the case. Judges will play the role of the second party. One member should introduce the team and summarize or describe the case study. All team members must participate in the presentation. The team members will be allowed to use their note cards to explain their decisions and rationale to the judges. The timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Participants should be prepared to defend their decisions and respond to questions from the judges. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. The performance portion of this event will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. In the case of a tie after the performances, the objective test score will be added to determine the final rank. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

81 2016–2017

Entrepreneurship Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Problem is understood and well-‐defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Alternatives are recognized with pros and cons stated and evaluated. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Logical solution is selected with positive and negative aspects of its implementation given. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Issues presented in case are addressed completely 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Anticipated results are based on correct reasoning. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language is used. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Team members demonstrate self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection. 0 1–2 3–4 5

All team members participate actively during the presentation. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Team demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.




Objective Test Score (To be used only in the event of a tie)

Names School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

82 2016–2017

FBLA Principles and Procedures FBLA members should be knowledgeable about the association and the information found in official publications. This event provides recognition for members who are interested in learning about the background and current information of FBLA-‐PBL. Content The written objective test may consist of general information about the organization of FBLA-‐PBL, its goals, creed, bylaws, and other facts found in the FBLA state and national handbook. Members should be familiar with the competitive event information found in the National/State Awards Program sections in the Chapter Management Handbooks. In addition, participants may find information for this event in Tomorrow’s Business Leader, Hotline, and any other official publication sent to chapters from the state and national offices. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Test will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

83 2016–2017

Future Business Leader This event honors outstanding FBLA members who have demonstrated leadership qualities, participation in FBLA, and evidence of knowledge and skills essential for successful careers in Business and Information Technology. Content This event consists of three parts: Prejudged Letter of Application and Résumé. The letter of application and résumé must be composed prior to the regional and state conferences. See below for proper times for submitting these materials. Objective Test. The written objective test may include questions about Business and Information Technology concepts (general Business and Information Technology knowledge such as accounting, economics, law, communication, math, technology, business procedures, and international business), FBLA-‐PBL history, FBLA programs, FBLA bylaws, and parliamentary procedure. Interview. Participants will be scheduled for interviews. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two (2) participants in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Participants must • have taken or be currently enrolled in courses that provide at least 2 units in Business and

Information Technology curriculum • have definite plans either to work in Business and Information Technology upon high school

graduation or to attend a postsecondary school or college and major in a Business and Information Technology program, such as Business and Information Technology Education, Business Administration, or Office Management

• be or have been a local, regional, or state FBLA officer or a chairman of a standing committee • be in not less than the second year of FBLA participation • have an above-‐average scholastic record in Business and Information Technology subjects. Regulations 1. Each participant will upload electronic copies of the following items:

• A one-page letter of application for the award from the participant. The letter should state the reasons the participant is deserving of this award. The letter should be addressed to the FBLA-PBL Specialist at the FBLA State Office address.

• A brief résumé not exceeding two pages. Photographs are not allowed. No other materials may be submitted to the judges.

2. Judges must deduct up to 10 points from the score of a participant who fails to follow directions. Judges will determine the amount of the point deduction to be used for all affected participants, prior to judging.

84 2016–2017

3. The letters of application and résumés must be prepared by student members, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the letters of application and résumés are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are written in an appropriate business style.

4. The letters of application and résumés will not be returned. Procedure Regional Prejudged Letters of Application and Résumés. Letters of application, résumés, and applications (if applicable) must be scanned into one PDF and uploaded to the regional director by a date established annually. Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Interview. Individuals with the top ten (10) scores on the objective test will be interviewed for ten (10) minutes by a panel of judges. Competitors should bring four manila folders containing a single copy of the uploaded letter of application and résumé. See Regulation 1. State Prejudged Letters of Application and Résumés. Advisors of first-‐ and second-‐place regional winners must scan letters of application, résumés, and applications (if applicable) into one PDF and upload to the State Leadership Conference Upload site by the date established annually. Students may make adjustments to their submissions between regional and state competition. Objective Test. Prior to the interview portion of the event, a 60-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Finalists will be posted outside of conference headquarters following the opening session. Interview. The individuals with the top ten (10) scores on the objective test will be scheduled for ten-‐ (10-‐) minute interviews with a panel of judges. Competitors should bring four manila folders containing a single copy of the uploaded letter of application and résumé. See Regulation 1. Judging Letters of Application and Résumés will be judged according to the Interview Materials Rating Sheet. Tests will be machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. The interview and application materials portions of this event will be evaluated by panels of judges. All decisions of the judges are final.

85 2016–2017

Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 6 Fifth 4 National Recognition 5

86 2016–2017

Future Business Leader Interview Materials Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Cover Letter

States award for which applying 0 2 3 4 Promotes self in letter. Lists skills, achievements, experience, etc. 0 4 6 8

States that the résumé is included with the letter and asks for an interview 0 2 3 4

Résumé

Targets award listed on cover letter 0 2 3 4 Reader friendly—categories can be found easily, white space utilized, professional fonts and font sizes

0 4 6 8

Included education, activities, and experience information 0 4 6 8

Brief, concise information 0 2 3 4 Spelling and Grammar

Documents are free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors 0 3 7 10

Subtotal /50 max.




87 2016–2017

Future Business Leader Interview Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Interview

Demonstrates poise, maturity, and a good attitude 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Demonstrates self-‐confidence, initiative, and assertiveness 0 1–3 4–7 8–10


Demonstrates professional appearance 0 1–2 3–4 5 Demonstrates proper greeting, introduction, and closing 0 1–2 3–4 5

Leadership Ability

Illustrates participation and leadership in FBLA 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Explains participation in other school and/or community organizations 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Explains and shows areas of outstanding achievement 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Indicates understanding of career knowledge and career plans 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Application Materials

Student brought application materials to interview 0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /100 max.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow the guidelines.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points if dress code is not followed


Application Materials (add to total points in preliminary round) /50 max.

Objective Test Score (add to total points in preliminary round) /100 max.



88 2016–2017

Global Business The global economy is a complex, continually flowing and constantly changing network of information, goods, services, and cultures. Most nations rely on other nations for natural resources to supply their needs and wants. Global business also provides new markets and investment opportunities as well as promotion of better relationships. Content This event is composed of two (2) parts: an objective test and a decision-‐making problem (case study) with the decision presented and defended before a panel of judges (at SLC only). Objective Test (Regional and State Levels) The objective test may include questions on business and its environment, forms of business ownership and the law, ethics and social responsibility, information and communication systems, planning and strategic management, financial management, human resource management, and careers. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners will take the objective test online prior to the State Leadership Conference. Finalists for the performance portion of the event will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. Oral Presentation/Case Study All finalist teams should report thirty (30) minutes before the first performance to receive instructions and time assignments. Twenty (20) minutes before the performance, each team will receive the case study. Two (2) 4" x 6" note cards will be provided for each team member and may be used during the preparation and performance of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. Note cards will be collected following the presentation. No reference materials, visual aids, or computer equipment may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance. Teams have seven (7) minutes to present the case. Teams should introduce themselves, describe the situation, make their recommendations, and summarize their case. All team members must participate in the presentation. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team composed of two (2) or three (3) members. One team member may have entered this event at a previous National Conference. Team members must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Team members will take the objective test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer.

89 2016–2017

Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference on the previous listed Content. The team members will take the test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Eight teams with the highest scores on this written test will be scheduled for a performance portion (case study). Finalists will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. The team has seven (7) minutes to present the case. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and at seven (7) minutes. The team has seven (7) minutes to interact with a panel of judges and present the solution to the case. The judges will play the role of the second party in the presentation and refer to the case for specifics. Judging All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

90 2016–2017

Global Business Performance Rating Sheet

State Conference Only Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Problem is understood and well-‐defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Alternatives are recognized with pros and cons stated and evaluated. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Logical solution is selected with positive and negative aspects of its implementation given. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Anticipated results are based on correct reasoning. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Team members show self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

All team members participate actively during the presentation. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer question. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.




Objective Test Score (To be used in the event of a tie) Name(s) School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

91 2016–2017

Gold Seal Chapter Award of Merit Hollis and Kitty Guy Award

Outstanding local chapters that have actively participated in projects and programs identified with the goals of FBLA-‐PBL are recognized nationally for their achievements. Eligibility A local chapter must • pay initial state and national dues by November 1 • submit a copy of the Local Chapter Annual Business Report prior to the State Leadership Conference.

The report must adhere to event guidelines as determined by a screening committee; reports that do not follow guidelines will not meet this requirement.

• earn Honor Chapter status by the end of the current year’s State Leadership Conference. Regulations The State Chapter may nominate up to 15 percent of its total number of active local chapters. Procedure 1. The records of the Points Coordinator are audited to determine the top 15 percent of Virginia’s active

chapters based upon the point system for selecting Honor Chapters. 2. The following suggested criteria for the Gold Seal Chapter Award of Merit will serve as guidelines for

the evaluation process: • Conducted projects or programs identified with the goals of FBLA-PBL • Sent representatives to FBLA conferences sponsored by the state chapter and the national association • Participated in state and national project(s)/program(s) for the current year • Encouraged other schools to organize FBLA or PBL chapters • Planned visits to business and industry • Conducted financial development projects, if school policy permits • Invited business persons and other professionals to become involved in chapter activities • Promoted FBLA-PBL • Conducted a public relations program in the school and community and documented the activities with

newspaper clippings and reports of radio/TV coverage • Recruited professional members

Judging The chapter’s files in the FBLA State Office and its Local Chapter Annual Business Report will be reviewed to substantiate the chapter’s nomination. Awards The number of awards presented is determined by a maximum of 15 percent of the active local chapters in the state adhering to the eligibility requirements and evaluation criteria. The point system for this event and others can be found on pages 5–7 and are duplicated in Appendix E.

92 2016–2017

Graphic Design Commercial design and promotion are essential in today’s business world; therefore, the preparation of computer-‐based digital art is paramount to the production of quality copy used for promotional purposes. Content 2017 Topic You have been hired as a graphic designer for a new Family Entertainment Center (FEC) opening in a city with a population of approximately 200,000. Provide a branding package for the owners that would include a name for the FEC, logo, theme, store front design, interior and exterior signage, and menu boards. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Regulations 1. Student members, not advisers, must prepare presentations. State and local advisers should serve as

consultants to ensure that the presentations are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are developed in an acceptable business style.

2. Presentations should be clearly labeled with the name of the event, member(s), and school. Procedures Regional Prejudged Project 1. Projects must address the given topic. 2. Entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. 3. Participants should place emphasis on graphic interpretation of the topic and design. 4. Participants may not use any words, diagrams, clipart, and/or artwork that are not in the public

domain. 5. Logo must be saved in JPEG, GIF, EPS, or AI format. 6. Graphics should be computer generated. 7. Advisors must scan entries into one PDF and upload to the regional director. (USB drives and CDs will

no longer be accepted.) 8. Members are expected to follow all applicable copyright laws. Performance (state) Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation at the SLC; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as state winners must register for the SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed.

• The presentation will be the opportunity for the students to “sell” their design and include an explanation of the choices made in the design.

93 2016–2017

• Participants are responsible for bringing a copy of the project submitted to use in the on-‐site presentation.

• Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges. • Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment and/or presentation items. The

participants must provide all equipment for the presentation. • The individual or team will have seven (7) minutes to present to a panel of judges and sell the logo

and tag line concept. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period.


94 2016–2017

Graphic Design Performance Rating Sheet (Regional Level)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Description of promotional materials 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Explains the design and development process 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Creates interest and desire for design 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Consistency in graphic design to theme 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Delivery

Statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise and good voice projection 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max.






95 2016–2017

Graphic Design Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Description of promotional materials 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Explains the design and development process 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Creates interest and desire for design 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Consistency in graphic design to theme 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Delivery

Statements are well-organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates self-confidence, poise, and good voice projection 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max.








96 2016–2017

Health Care Administration Health care administrators manage the business side of health services, ensuring the effective use of resources to provide the best medical care to the community. These skills include managing office activities, enhancing communication skills, identifying legal and ethical issues in health care practices, managing financial functions, and enhancing employability skills. This event recognizes FBLA members who have the ability to help people in the health care field. Content The written objective test may include questions on managing office activities, enhancing communication skills, identifying legal and ethical issues in health care practices, managing financial functions, and enhancing employability skills. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible for national competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at the regional level; 60 minutes at the state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators that are noiseless may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Test will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

97 2016–2017

Help Desk The ability to provide technical assistance to the users of computer hardware and software is essential to the success of any organization and its continued operation. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding of technical assistance and how to best provide it to end users. Content This event is composed of two (2) parts: an objective test and a decision-‐making problem (case study) with the decision presented and defended before a panel of judges (at SLC only). The written objective test may include questions on operating systems hardware, set-‐up, and operation, software applications, e-‐mail, Internet access, printing, networking and network connection issues, hardware protection (including spam, virus protection, and critical updates), and communication skills. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional: A 50 minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered at the regional level. State: Prior to the State Leadership Conference, a 60-‐minute test based on the previously listed Content will be administered online (details will be provided by regional director). Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Level Only: The top eight (8) finalists (individuals scoring the highest on the written test) will participate in the role-‐play portion of the event. Two (2) 4”x6” note cards will be provided to each competitor and may be used during the event preparation and performance. Note cards will be collected following the presentation. No additional reference materials are allowed. Participants will receive the prompt and will be given 10 minutes to prepare their role-‐play. Participants will have 5 minutes for their role-‐play and will receive a warning at 4 minutes. Judging Test will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

98 2016–2017


99 2016–2017

Help Desk Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Problem Identification

Describes the situation(s) 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Problem/incident properly documented 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Suggests a solution or recommendation(s); resolved problem 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Technology

Basic hardware/software knowledge, used correct terminology 0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrates ability to effectively answer client’s technical questions 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Meets the needs of the client/customer 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Demonstrates troubleshooting skills and effective investigative methods 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery


Demonstrates self-‐confidence, initiative, and assertiveness 0 1–2 3–4 5


Demonstrates conflict-‐resolution skills 0 1–2 3–4 5 Brings situation(s) to closure 0 1–2 3–4 5 Subtotal /100 max.

Dress Code Penalty: Deduct five (5) points when dress code is not followed.

Penalty: Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow guidelines.


Objective Test Score (to be used in the event of a tie)


100 2016–2017

Honor Chapters Content As an objective means of promoting and recognizing outstanding work in Virginia FBLA chapters, an evaluation in the form of points has been given to various FBLA activities. The purpose of the point system is to encourage participation. Eligibility All local chapters are eligible. Regulations 1. Chapters must earn at least 100 points according to the points sheet; junior high/middle school

chapters must earn at least 60 points. 2. Twenty of the total points earned must be for a balanced program of activities—Business and

Information Technology knowledge and skills, school and community service, leadership and promotion, financial activities, and social activities by submitting activity reports on the Report Management System.

3. The FBLA Points Year runs from the end of the previous year’s State Leadership Conference through the end of the current year’s State Leadership Conference.

Procedure Records for each chapter are maintained by the FBLA Points Coordinator. The only point’s information submitted by local chapters will be activity reports for a balanced program. The Points Coordinator obtains additional points information directly from Regional Directors and State Office records. Judging The records of the Points Coordinator are audited prior to and during the State Leadership Conference to determine those chapters earning Honor Chapter status. Awards All Honor Chapters will be recognized at the State Leadership Conference. The chapter earning the highest number of points will be recognized as the State’s Most Outstanding Chapter. The point system for all Honor Chapters events can be found on pages 32–34 and are duplicated in Appendix E.

101 2016–2017

Impromptu Speaking The ability to express one’s thoughts without prior preparation is a valuable asset, as are poise, self-‐confidence, and organization of facts. This event recognizes FBLA members who develop qualities of business leadership by combining quick and clear thinking with conversational speaking. Content Participants will be given a topic related to one or more of the following: FBLA-‐PBL goals, FBLA-‐PBL activities, FBLA-‐PBL current national programs, current events, and/or relevant business topics. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. Participants must be a member of an active local chapter and on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐place regional winners will participate at the State Leadership Conference. Regulations 1. Two (2) 4" x 6" note card will be given to each participant and may be used during the preparation

and performance. 2. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. 3. Participants must furnish their own pens and pencils. 4. The speech should be four (4) minutes in length. Penalty points will be assessed for speeches less

than 3:31 or more than 4:29 minutes. 5. No reference materials may be brought to or used during the preparation or presentation. Procedure Participants must report for instructions thirty (30) minutes prior to the time of the first scheduled speech. The order of performance will be drawn at random by an impartial person in the event office. Participants will be allowed ten (10) minutes to prepare their speeches prior to appearing before the judges. All participants will address the same topic in their speeches. Any notes made during the preparation time may be used when speaking. The note card must be submitted to the event administrator at the conclusion of the speech. Information may be written on both sides of the note card. Each speech should be four (4) minutes in length. A timekeeper will stand at three (3) minutes and at four (4) minutes. When the speaker is finished, the time used by the participant will be recorded, noting a deduction of five (5) points for any time less than 3:31 or more than 4:29 minutes. The first-‐ and second-‐place winners of this event will be eligible to compete at the National Leadership Conference. Judging Participants’ speeches will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. A maximum number of five (5) awards will be presented at the State Leadership Conference.

102 2016–2017


103 2016–2017

Impromptu Speaking Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Relation to the topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Memorable central theme stated and repeated 0 1–2 3–4 5 Supporting information is accurate and appropriate 0 1–2 3–4 5

Organization

Immediate introduction of topic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Strong support for topic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Effective memorable conclusion 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery

Extemporaneous delivery; i.e., not merely read from notes 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, eye contact, and appropriate gestures 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional tone, appropriate language (inflection, pace, emphasis, and enthusiasm) 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Presentation is sincere, interesting, clear, creative, and convincing. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations less than 3:31 or more than 4:29 minutes. Time:





104 2016–2017

Insurance & Risk Management This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding of and skill in basic insurance and risk management principles and procedures. Content The written objective test may include questions on the risk management process; property and liability insurance; health, disability, and life insurance; insurance knowledge; decision making; careers; and ethics. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event (state level). Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

105 2016–2017

Introduction to Business The American business enterprise system functions effectively when participants are properly trained to make good business decisions. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding of the American business enterprise system and its effect on consumers, employees, and entrepreneurs. Content The written objective test may include questions on the characteristics and organization of business; money management and banking; economic systems; rights and responsibilities of employees, managers, owners, and government; insurance; consumerism; and career awareness. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

106 2016–2017

Introduction to Business Communication Learning to communicate in a manner that is clearly understood by the receiver of the message is a crucial task for all businesspeople. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who are working toward improving their business communication skills of writing, speaking, and listening. Content The written objective test may include grammar, word definition and usage, proofreading, spelling, punctuation, numbers, capitalization, and oral communication concepts. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

107 2016–2017

Introduction to Business Presentation This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate the ability to effectively use presentation technologies and software to prepare and deliver their message. Content 2017 Topic Create a presentation for professional members, local businesses, and/or vendors to encourage participation in and benefits of judging opportunities at FBLA competitions. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Regulations 1. Student members, not advisers, must prepare presentations. State and local advisers should serve as

consultants to ensure that the presentations are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are developed in an accepted business style.

2. Presentations should be clearly labeled with the name of the student participants and their school name, city, and state (regional competition only).

Procedure (Regional and State)

• Competitors must use a presentation software program as an aid in delivering the business presentation.

• A table, screen, and power will be supplied; the individual or team must provide all other equipment for the presentation.

• Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment or presentation items. • The individual or team members must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g., speaking,

setup, operating audiovisual equipment). Other representatives of the chapter may not provide assistance.

• The individual or team has seven (7) minutes to deliver the presentation. All team members must actively participate in the presentation.

• Visual aids and samples specifically related to the project may be used in the presentation; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience.

• A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period.

Awards All judges’ decisions are final. The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

108 2016–2017


109 2016–2017

Introduction to Business Presentation Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Presentation clearly related to topic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Purpose clearly stated 0 1–2 3–4 5 Effectively uses a variety of formatting and effect features of program such as text, graphics, and transitions

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Quality of design is professional. Design elements are appropriate for a business presentation (e.g., color choice, font style and size, and so forth).

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Technology is effectively integrated into overall presentation 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Suitability and accuracy of statements in presentation 0 1–2 3–4 5

Organization

Topic adequately developed 0 1–2 3–4 5

Logical sequence of ideas 0 1–2 3–4 5

Accomplished purpose 0 1–2 3–4 5

Delivery

Presentation and statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10



Subtotal /100 max.






110 2016–2017

Introduction to Business Procedures Competency in performing daily tasks is a necessity in business. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who possess knowledge of basic skills and procedures and the ability to make intelligent business decisions. Content The written objective test may include questions on human relations, business terminology, records management, reprographics, information processing terminology, telecommunications, and Business and Information Technology equipment. Proofreading and decision making may also be included. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The regional test will be 50 minutes; the state test will be 60 minutes. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

111 2016–2017

Introduction to Financial Math Acquiring the ability to solve common business mathematical problems is a basic skill needed by all prospective Business and Information Technology employees. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have an understanding of basic math functions needed in Business and Information Technology. Content The written objective test may consist of items related to Business and Information Technology such as questions on basic math concepts, decimals, fractions, percentages, discounts, and consumer credit. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be fifty (50) minutes at regional level, sixty (60) minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

112 2016–2017

Introduction to Information Technology Successful business leaders must understand the impact of technology and how to effectively harness it to drive business. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate acquired technology skills aligned with the Internet and Computing Core Certification (IC3) objectives. Content The written objective test may include questions on computer hardware and software, operating systems, common program functions, word processing, spreadsheets, presentation software, networking concepts, e-‐mail and electronic communication. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test (online regional) based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event (state level). Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

113 2016–2017

Introduction to Parliamentary Procedure This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate knowledge of basic principles of parliamentary procedure along with an understanding of FBLA’s organization and procedures. Content The written objective test will consist of parliamentary procedure principles and FBLA bylaws. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

114 2016–2017

Job Interview This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate proficiency in applying for employment in the Business and Information Technology industry. Content This event consists of two parts: Prejudged Letter of Application/Résumé The letter of application/résumé must be uploaded prior to the regional conference and submitted to the Regional Director. The deadline for submission will be determined by each Regional Director. Finalists will be chosen based upon results of prejudged materials. Interview Each finalist will be scheduled for a simulated job interview. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐place regional winner is eligible for state competition. Each participant must • have definite plans either to work in the Business and Information Technology industry upon high

school graduation or to attend a postsecondary school or college and major in a Business and Information Technology program, such as Business and Information Technology Education, Business Administration, or Office Management

• have an above-‐average scholastic records in Business and Information Technology subjects • have a marketable skill in one or more Business and Information Technology area and apply for a job

classified as a Business and Information Technology occupation. This job must be one for which he/she is now qualified or will be qualified at the completion of the current school year.

Regulations 1. Each participant must apply for a business or business-‐related position with Merit Corporation. Merit

Corporation is a fictional large national corporation headquartered in Washington, D.C. Company benefits include paid holidays and vacations, sick leave, a retirement plan, and health insurance. Salary will be commensurate with experience and education. Merit Corporation is an equal opportunity employer. The job must be one for which the competitor is now qualified or will be qualified for at the time of the current school year’s competition. It may be an internship, a part-‐time job, or a full-‐time job.

2. In addition to prejudged materials, each participant must bring four letter-‐size manila folders, each containing a single copy of the following items:

115 2016–2017

• A one-‐page letter of application from the participant addressed to: Dr. Terry E. Johnson Director, Human Resources Merit Corporation 1640 Franklin Place Washington, DC 20041

• A brief résumé not exceeding two pages. Photographs are not allowed. No other materials may be submitted to the judges.

3. The tab of each folder must be labeled with participant’s name, school, and event title. Include the participant’s name on all pages submitted.

4. Judges must deduct up to ten (10) points from the score of a participant who submits materials but does not adhere to the event guidelines for the submission of proper materials. Judges will determine the amount of the point deduction, to be used for all affected participants, prior to judging.

5. The letter of application and résumé must be prepared by a student member, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the letter of application and résumé are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are written in an appropriate business style.

6. The letters of application and résumés will not be returned. Procedure Regional Letters of Application and Résumés. Letters of application, résumés, and applications (if applicable) must be scanned into one PDF and uploaded to the regional director prior to the Regional Spring Conference by an exact date to be established annually. See Regulation No. 2. Interview. Individuals who qualify as a finalist based on pre-‐judged scores will be interviewed for ten (10) minutes by a panel of judges. Contestants should bring four manila folders with the appropriate materials to the interview. State Prejudged Letters of Application and Résumés. Letters of application, résumés, and applications (if applicable) must be scanned into one PDF and uploaded to the SLC Upload Site by the SLC deadline date, established annually. Students may make adjustments to their submissions between regional and state competition. See Regulation No. 2. Interview. All regional representatives will be scheduled for ten-‐ (10-‐) minute interviews with a panel of judges. Contestants should bring four manila folders with the appropriate materials to the interview. Judging The event will be evaluated by panels of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

116 2016–2017


117 2016–2017

Job Interview Interview Materials Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Cover Letter

States job for which applying 0 2 3 4 Promotes self in letter. Lists skills, achievements, experience, etc. 0 4 6 8 States that the resume is included with the letter and asks for an interview 0 2 3 4

Résumé

Targets job listed on cover letter 0 2 3 4 Reader friendly—categories can be found easily, white space utilized, professional fonts and font sizes

0 4 6 8

Included education, activities, and experience information 0 4 6 8 Brief, concise information 0 2 3 4 Spelling and Grammar

Documents are free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors 0 3 7 10

Subtotal /50 max. Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow guidelines.

Total Points /50 max. Name School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

118 2016–2017

Job Interview Interview Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Professional Presentation

Demonstrates proper nonverbal communication (eye contact, posture, facial expressions, body language, smile)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates a strong introduction (smile and handshake) and closing (thanks interviewer) 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Demonstrates self-‐confidence, takes initiative, and is enthusiastic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Professional appearance 0 1–2 3–4 5 Interview

Demonstrates the ability to understand and respond to interview questions 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Relate previous experience/activities with position's duties and skills necessary to succeed (realistic appraisal of self)

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Possesses knowledge about the position and career field 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Possesses excellent communication skills, uses appropriate grammar, and uses appropriate length of time to answer questions

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Participant asks questions that demonstrates interest in organization and understanding of position

0 1–2 3–4 5


Participant brought copy of application materials to interview 0 5

Subtotal /100 max. Penalty Deduct five (5) points when dress code is not followed.


Final Score /100 max. Name School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

119 2016–2017

Journalism Content This event consists of a 50�minute test at the regional level and a 60-‐minute test administered during the State Leadership Conference (SLC). Objective Test. The online objective test may include questions on economics of journalism, grammar & format, law & ethics, business of journalism, and history of journalism. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at the regional level and 60 minutes at the state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

120 2016–2017

L. Marguerite Crumley, Frank Manning Peele, Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson Scholarships

Content The State Executive Board established four scholarships for higher education to give recognition to outstanding leaders in Virginia FBLA. Since these scholarships will provide additional opportunities for leadership growth, the Board is providing financial assistance toward the future education of these leaders. In March 2008, the Virginia FBLA-‐PBL Foundation added two additional scholarships in honor of former Virginia FBLA-‐PBL State Specialist, Sarah Lowe Thompson. These scholarships are named for L. Marguerite Crumley, a former State Supervisor of Business Education who served as FBLA-‐PBL Executive Secretary, State Chairman, and a member of the FBLA-‐PBL National Board of Directors; Frank Manning Peele, who was FBLA-‐PBL Executive Secretary from 1970–78; and Sarah Lowe Thompson, State Specialist from 1978–2000 and former Chairman of the FBLA-‐PBL National Board of Directors. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit two (2) applications to the Regional Director by the date established annually. Chapters that have contributed to the Virginia FBLA-‐PBL Foundation may submit a third application for the Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson scholarship. Applications may be completed and submitted before the students have been notified of their acceptance at the colleges to which they have applied. The applicants must • have earned the Future Level of the Business Achievement Awards • be prospective graduates of secondary schools • be residents of Virginia • be active members of FBLA • have completed (or will complete by end of the school year) acceptable program(s) in Business and

Information Technology Education • have plans for continuing education in the field of Business and Information Technology at a college,

junior or community college, technical institute, or other educational institution of higher learning • submit official application that will be evaluated for content and appearance. Foundation scholarship applicants’ chapter must be a current member of the Virginia FBLA-‐PBL Foundation. Procedure Regional Four (4) copies of the application will be sent to the regional director by the date established annually. A committee appointed by the Regional Director will review the scholarship applications and select three finalists—one of which must be from a school that has contributed to the foundation and three alternates based upon the submitted applications. The Regional Director will send to the FBLA State Office all necessary forms for the regional finalists. Regional alternates will be eligible for state competition only if finalists are unable to participate.

121 2016–2017

State Regional finalists will be interviewed by a panel of judges at the State Leadership Conference. Of the three regional finalists, one will be assigned to be interviewed for the Crumley scholarship, one for the Peele scholarship, and one for the Thompson scholarship. Interviews will be eight (8) minutes in length. These scholarships consist of six cash awards of $1,000 each to be paid to the educational institutions upon notification from the admitting institutions that the students have made application, have been admitted, and have officially enrolled. All finalists will be scheduled for an 8-‐minute interview with a panel of judges. Judging At the regional level, a panel of judges will select three (3) finalists and three alternates based upon the applications submitted. The interview portion of these events at the state level will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number is six (6) finalists at the regional level; six (6) finalists and three (3) alternates at the state level. Forms relating to the L. Marguerite Crumley, Frank Manning Peele, Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson Scholarships can also be found in Appendix F. Points for Participation Regional: Finalist 4 State: Winner 5 Alternate 3 Alternate 3 Participant 2

122 2016–2017

L. Marguerite Crumley, Frank Manning Peele, Foundation’s Sarah Lowe Thompson Scholarships

Interview Rating Sheet Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Scholastic/Organizational Qualifications

Scholastic Aptitude/Achievement 0 1–8 9–17 18–25 FBLA Involvement 0 1–8 9–17 18–25 Interview

Professional appearance (grooming and appropriate attire); poise, maturity, and attitude; communication skills

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Evidence of career planning; evidence of community involvement; goals and aspirations 0 1–5 6–10 11–15


Clear and concise presentation of facts; neatness; completeness; correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling

0 1–6 7–13 14–20

Penalty Points Deduct up to ten (10) points for failure to follow guidelines.

Dress Code Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow dress code.



123 2016–2017

Largest Local Chapter Membership Content Effective regional, state, and national programs depend upon membership support and growth. Increased membership provides resources for the expansion of services to local chapters. Membership recruitment offers a worthwhile experience in public relations and leadership. Recognition is given to local chapters that have attained the largest membership in FBLA. Eligibility All local chapters are eligible. Procedure Official membership records are audited in the FBLA State Office; therefore, no entry form is required for this event. Judging Winners in this event are determined after an audit of state and national membership records. Awards The three largest chapters in each region will be recognized at the Regional Spring Conference. Virginia’s five (5) largest chapters will be recognized at the State Leadership Conference. The largest junior high/middle school chapter membership will be awarded separately. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Fourth 2 Fifth 1

124 2016–2017

Local Chapter Annual Business Report Business reports are used extensively to inform management, staff, stockholders, and the general public about all aspects of the business. This event recognizes FBLA chapters that effectively summarize their year’s activities. This event provides participants with valuable experience in preparing annual business reports. Content The report should summarize the activities of the local chapter for the current school year. Projects used for other FBLA reports may be included. The report should include the chapter’s profile, productivity, recognition, and business procedures. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one report. This is a state and national event only. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the SLC submission site by the date established annually. THIS EVENT IS ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS IF A CHAPTER IS TO BE NOMINATED FOR THE GOLD SEAL CHAPTER AWARD OF MERIT. REPORTS NOT ADHERING TO THE GUIDELINES WILL NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. Regulations The report format must adhere to the following guidelines. General

• The report must be prepared by student members, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in a business style.

• The report must describe activities of the local chapter that were conducted between the previous year’s State Leadership Conference and the current year’s State Leadership Conference.

• Entries not adhering to these regulations will be disqualified and will not count toward Gold Seal Chapter Status.

• Reports will not be returned to chapters. Report Contents • The report must include a table of contents. A title page, divider pages, and appendices are


appendices. Front covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8½" by 11". • The report may be single-‐ or double-‐spaced. • The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. Report Covers • Front covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the event, and

the year in which the report is entered. • Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit.

125 2016–2017

Procedure The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. If information is not available for a particular criterion, include a statement to that effect in the report. The report must be similar to that of a business report with substantiated statements in a clear and concise format. Reports will be submitted in PDF Format and uploaded to the Virginia FBLA SLC submission site by the annually established state leadership conference deadline date. Creativity through design and use of meaningful graphics is encouraged. Judging Reports will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is 10. Points for Participation State: First 15 Second 14 Honorable Mention 12 Participant 10 National Recognition 5

126 2016–2017

Local Chapter Annual Business Report Report Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Introduction

“State of the Chapter” remarks to current members by chapter president • Number of members • Size of school and community

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Activities to Benefit Chapter and Its Members

Program of work 0 1–2 3–4 5

Recruitment activities 0 1–2 3–4 5

Leadership development 0 1–2 3–4 5

Career exploration and preparation 0 1–2 3–4 5

Business partnerships 0 1–2 3–4 5

Chapter fundraising 0 1–2 3–4 5

Public relations activities and chapter publicity 0 1–2 3–4 5

Activities to Benefit Other Individuals and Organizations

State and national projects 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Other community service projects 0 1–2 3–4 5

Conferences and Recognition

Participation in FBLA Conferences 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Other chapter and individual recognitions earned 0 1–2 4–7 8–10

Competitive event winners and participants 0 1–2 3–4 5

Report Format

Clear, concise presentation with logical arrangement of information following the rating sheet categories 0 1–2 3–4 5

Correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and acceptable business style 0 1–2 3–4 5

Design and graphics are appropriate for purpose 0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /100 max.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): cover incorrect missing table of contents more than fifteen (15) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /100 max.


127 2016–2017

Local Recruitment of Chapters Content This event honors local chapters that charter or reactivate chapters of FBLA and/or PBL. Additional FBLA and PBL chapters provide more students with the opportunity to become better prepared for careers in business and information technology and enable the expansion of services and activities. Eligibility All local chapters are eligible. Chapters installing officers and inducting members of chapters already active do not qualify for this event. Regulations 1. A local chapter must recruit a minimum of two new/reactivating chapters to qualify. 2. A maximum of two chapters can receive credit for chartering/reactivating the same chapter. Procedure Official membership records are audited in the FBLA State Office; therefore, no entry form is required for this event. Judging The winner in this event is determined by an audit of state membership records prior to the State Leadership Conference. Awards The winning chapter will be recognized at the State Leadership Conference. Points for Participation State Winner: 5 National Recognition

5

128 2016–2017

Management Decision Making Making critical decisions that provide the right direction and a winning position in today's business world is essential to good management. Business executives must make high-‐quality, nearly instantaneous decisions all the time. The ability to make the right decisions concerning vision, growth, resources, strengths, and weaknesses leads to a successful business. It is management’s responsibility to manage for today and tomorrow, to manage for optimum efficiency, and to manage marketplace competition. Content This event is composed of two (2) parts: an objective test and a decision-‐making problem (case study) with the decision presented and defended before a panel of judges (at SLC only). Members of the team will assume the role(s) of management and present a solution to the case-‐study problem. Objective Test (Regional and State Levels) The objective test may include questions on business and the business environment, forms of business ownership and the law, ethics and social responsibility, information and communication systems, planning and strategic management, financial management, human resource management, and careers. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners will take the objective test online prior to the State Leadership Conference. Top five (5) finalists in the performance portion of the event will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. Case Study (State Level Only) The case study may consist of a problem encountered by managers in one of the following areas: human resource management, financial management, marketing management, or information systems management. Members of the team will assume the role(s) of management and present a solution to the case problem. The five (5) teams with the highest objective test scores will be scheduled for the performance portion of the event. The order of performance will be drawn at random by an impartial person in the event office. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team composed of two (2) or three (3) members. One team member may have entered this event at a previous National Conference. Team members must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Team members will take the objective test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event.

129 2016–2017

State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test on the previously listed Content will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference. The team members will take the test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer. Eight teams with the highest scores on this written test will be scheduled for a performance portion (case study). Finalist will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. Case Study. Members of the eight finalist teams will meet for instructions and time assignments thirty (30) minutes before the first performance is scheduled to begin. Twenty (20) minutes before performance, each team will receive the decision-‐making problem. Two 2" by 6" note cards will be provided for each participant and may be used during the preparation and performance of the oral segment of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. No reference materials, visual aids, or computer equipment may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance. The team has up to seven (7) minutes to present the problem to the judges. All team members must be involved. The judges will interact with the members during the presentation. The team members will be allowed to use their note cards during the interaction. Judges will act as the second party in this interactive component. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Judging All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

130 2016–2017

Management Decision Making Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Problem is understood and well-‐defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Alternatives are recognized, with pros and cons stated and evaluated.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Logical solution is selected with positive and negative aspects of its implementation given.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Issues presented in case are addressed completely.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Management’s decision is clear. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Delivery

Statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language is used.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Team members show self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection.

0 1–2 3–4 5

All team members participate actively during the presentation.

0 1–2 3–4 5

Team demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.





Name(s)

School

Judge’s Signature Date

Judge’s Comments:

131 2016–2017

Management Information Systems The ability to design and implement an information system solution to effectively manage vast amounts of information is a valuable skill that leads to the success of many business entities today. The use of technology to develop these information systems plays a crucial role in a business’ ability to compete in today’s business environment. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding of and ability to apply these skills. Content This event consists of two (2) parts: an objective test and a performance component. Objective Test (Regional and State Levels). An objective test will be administered based on competencies involving systems analysis and design—systems development life cycle, database management and modeling concepts, object-‐oriented analysis and design, user interfaces, system controls, defining system and business requirements. Team members will take one objective test collaboratively. Case Study (State Level Top Five Only). A case study will be given concerning a decision-‐making problem outlining a small business and its informational environment and needs. Participants will then analyze the situation and recommend an information system solution to address the issues raised. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team composed of two (2) or three (3) members. One team member may have entered this event at a previous National Conference. Team members must be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL National Office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Team members will take the objective test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test on the previously listed Content will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference. The team members will take the test collaboratively—each team will submit one answer sheet. Case Study

Eight teams with the highest scores on this written test will be scheduled for a performance portion (case study). Finalists will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference.

132 2016–2017

All teams should report thirty (30) minutes before the first performance to receive instructions and time assignments. Twenty (20) minutes before the performance, each team will receive the case study. Two (2) 4" x 6" note cards will be provided for each team member and may be used during the preparation and performance of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note card. Note cards will be collected following the presentation. No reference materials, visual aids, or electronic devices may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance. Teams have seven (7) minutes to present the case. The judges will interact with the members during the presentation. Teams should introduce themselves, describe the situation, make their recommendations, and summarize their case. All team members must participate in the presentation. Judges will play the role of the second party in the case. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. Judging All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

133 2016–2017

Management Information Systems Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the situation 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Issues a solution or recommendation 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Uses correct terminology 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Presents effective strategy 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Explanation

System appropriate for size of business 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 System solution feasible and realistic given specified time frame

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Technology is currently available 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Future needs are considered 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Information security issues are addressed 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Meets the needs of the company 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery

Team members show self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10


0 1–3 4–7 8–10

All team members participate actively during the presentation.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /150 max.





Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

134 2016–2017

Marketing Marketing involves the distribution of products and services to the consumer. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who possess knowledge of the basic principles of marketing. Content Objective Test (Regional and State). The written objective test may include questions on the basic marketing fundamentals (price, product, place, and promotion), economics, selling and merchandizing, channels of distribution, marketing, information research and planning, promotion, advertising media, legal and social aspects of marketing, and e-‐commerce. Case Study (State Only). An interactive case study will be given concerning a marketing problem. Participants will present a solution to the problem. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team of two or three members in the regional event. Participants who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference are not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference. Finalists will be posted after the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. The top eight (8) teams with the highest score on the objective test will advance to the final round. The objective test score will be used to break a tie.

• Twenty (20) minutes before the performance, the team will receive the case study. • Two (2) 4" x 6" note cards will be provided and may be used during the preparation and

performance of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. Note cards will be collected following the presentation.

• No reference materials, visual aids, or electronic devices may be brought to or used during the preparation or performance.

• Each team has seven (7) minutes to interact with a panel of judges and present the solution to the case. The judges will play the role of the second party in the case.

• A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes.

135 2016–2017


136 2016–2017

Marketing Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Problem is understood and well defined. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Alternatives are recognized with pros and cons stated and evaluated.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Logical solution is selected with positive and negative aspects of its implementation given.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Issues presented in case are addressed completely.

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Marketing’s decision is clear. 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Delivery

Statements well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

All team members actively participate during the presentation.

0 1–2 3–4 5

Team members show self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection

0 1–2 3–4 5

Team members demonstrate the ability to effectively answer questions

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.





Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

137 2016–2017

Mobile Application Development Society is daily moving to a constant feed of communication, transfer of information, and the need to access or process information in a mobile environment. Mobile Applications are necessary to provide users with the ability to be productive while away from their full computers. Mobile Applications can be used as a lite version of something that would be done on a full computer, or they can provide a tool for something that users would only need to do on their phone. Content 2017 Conference Topic Create a mobile application that would allow a platform for a digital yard sale to raise funds to attend NLC. The app should allow for the donation of items, including picture, suggested price, and a rating for the condition of the item. The app should allow for interaction/comments on the items. Code should be error free. Overview This event consists of two (2) parts: a prejudged mobile application and a performance component (state level only). The program must address the topic given. Performances should describe the program completed. Specifically, the performance should address the program creation, processes used, and results of the program. All entries will participate in the preliminary performance to explain the project development and implementation. Prejudged Program (Regional and State)

• The individual or team will research the topic, and then create a mobile application on the topic. • CD, DVD, or USB device containing the executable object, data, program documentation (including

but not limited to, execution instructions, system requirements, and text files for all program code) and support files needed to run the executable file need to be received along with a Statement of Assurance.

• The prejudged submission must include the source code and screen shots of the GUI in PDF format for review.

• The solution must run standalone with no programming errors. • May use one of the following platforms to develop the mobile application: Google’s Android™,

Apple iOS™ or Microsoft Windows Phone™. • The application may not be deployed as a web application delivered over HTTP. • The application may deploy from a smartphone, tablet, or both, but must be smartphone

deployable. • The application need not be available for download from a digital-‐distribution multimedia content

service such as Google Play™, Apple Store, or Microsoft. • The prejudged submission must include the source code and screen shots of the GUI in PDF format

for review. • Program produced for this event must be prepared by the participant(s) without help from other

programmers or teachers. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office

138 2016–2017

as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Regulations 1. Student members, not advisers, must prepare the application. Advisers should serve as consultants to

ensure that the entries are well organized, contain substantiated statements, and are developed in an acceptable business style.

2. Submissions should be clearly labeled with the name of the team event, members, school, and date. Procedures Regional Prejudged Project 1. Presentations must address the given topic. 2 Presentations should be submitted on appropriately labeled media with a Statement of Assurance. 3. Entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. 4. Entries must be submitted on CD, DVD, or USB device. State Prejudged Project Regional Directors will forward winning entries to the state office. Performance Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation at the SLC; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as state winners must register for the SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed.

• Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment or presentation items. • The following will be provided: Internet, screen, power, and table. Access may not be via WiFi, so

participants should plan appropriately when selecting laptops/tablets on which to present. • The individual will have seven (7) minutes to describe the program, address copyright laws,

explain development software used, and explain features and functionality. • At the end of six (6) minutes, a timekeeper will stand indicating one minute is left. At seven (7)

minutes the timekeeper will stand, indicating time is up. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period. • Visual aids and samples related to the project may be used (including a mobile device with the

App loaded); however, no items may be left with the judges. Judging Submissions will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

139 2016–2017


140 2016–2017

Mobile Application Development Production Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Program Usability and Support

• Code packaged and readme file included with instructions for testing application 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Program launches and is functional on appropriate IDE (Xcode, Eclipse, Visual Studio)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Design Evaluation

Fully addresses concept and topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Graphics are appropriate and consistent for concept and age group 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Incorporates social media elements as appropriate to topic 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

ICON appropriate for application 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Utilizes MVC and navigation is clear 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Application is bug free and does not crash 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Code is well written and logically designed 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Subtotal /100 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for not adhering to guidelines Statement of Assurance not received Total Points /100 max. Name(s) School Judge’s Signature Date Judge’s Comments:

141 2016–2017

Mobile Application Development Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the scenario 0 1–2 3–4 5 Describes the planning process used to design the application 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Describes application documentation 0 1–2 3–4 5

Describes input/output and application parameters 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Describes how the application flows 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Describes application template or structure 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Describes the usefulness of the application 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery



Demonstrates the ability to effectively answer questions 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time:







142 2016–2017

Network Design The ability to calculate the needs of an organization and then design and implement network solutions is a valuable skill in today’s connected workplace. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who demonstrate an understanding of an ability to apply these skills. Content The written objective test may include questions on network installation—planning, configuration, and topology, problem solving and troubleshooting, network administrator functions, configuration of Internet resources, backup and disaster recovery, configuring network resources and services, and security. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team in the regional event. The team must be composed of a team of two (2) to three members. Participants who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference are not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level. Team members will take the test collaboratively. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State The event consists of two (2) parts: an objective test and a performance component. A one (1) hour objective test will be administered based on the competencies listed online prior to the State Leadership Conference. Team members will take one objective test collaboratively. A case study will be given outlining a small organization and its computing environment and needs. Participants will then be required to analyze the situation and recommend a network solution to address the issues raised in the case study. Finalists will be posted at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. The top eight (8) teams with the highest score on the objective test will advance to the final round. The objective test score will be used to break a tie.

• Twenty (20) minutes before the performance, each team will receive the case study. • Two (2) 4" x 6" note cards will be provided for each team member and may be used during the

preparation and performance of the event. Information may be written on both sides of the note cards. They will be collected following the presentation.

• A flip chart and markers will be provided. • No reference materials, visual aids, or electronic devices may be brought to or used during the

preparation or performance. • Teams have seven (7) minutes to interact with the judges and present the case. The judges will act

as the second party in the interactive case. • Teams should introduce themselves, describe the situation, make their recommendations, and

143 2016–2017

summarize their case. All team members must participate in the presentation. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and again at seven (7) minutes.


144 2016–2017

Network Design Performance Rating Sheet (State Conference Only)



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the situation 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Resolves problem 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Uses correct terminology 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Presents an effective strategy 0 1–10 11–20 21–30 Technology

System appropriate for size of business 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Technology is currently available or being developed 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Future needs are considered 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Meets the needs of the company 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used. 0 1–2 3–4 5

Team members demonstrate self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection. 0 1–2 3–4 5

All team members participate actively during the presentation. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Team members demonstrate the ability to effectively answer questions. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /150 max.

Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow the guidelines.





145 2016–2017

Networking Concepts Acquiring a high level of familiarization and proficiency in working on and with networks is essential in today’s connected workplace. This event provides recognition for FBLA members who have an understanding of data communications and network administrations. Content The written objective test will consist of items related to the responsibilities of a network administrator, methods for accessing and configuring network services, automation of user tasks and activities, and use of messaging services. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered . The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators that are noiseless may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (e.g., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

146 2016–2017

Organizational Leadership Content This event consists of a 50�minute test at the regional level and a 60-‐minute test administered during the State Leadership Conference (SLC). Objective Test. The online objective test may include questions on leadership concepts, leadership managerial roles, behavior & motivation, networking, communication skills, leader & follower relations, team leadership, self�managed teams, strategic leadership for managing crises & change, levels of leadership, leadership theory, traits of effective leaders, personality profile of effective leaders, leadership attitudes, ethical leadership, relationship between power, politics, networking, & negotiation, coaching, managing conflict, team decision making, organizational politics, team skills, charismatic & transformational leadership, stewardship & servant leadership, diverse settings. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at the regional level and 60 minutes at the state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

147 2016–2017

Parliamentary Procedure Dorothy L. Travis Award

This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate knowledge of the principles of parliamentary procedure. This event is based on team rather than individual competition. Team participants develop speaking ability and poise through competitive performance. Content This event consists of two parts: Objective Test—Regional and State The majority of questions on the written objective test will consist of parliamentary procedure principles with additional questions on FBLA state and national bylaws. Performance—State Only The case problem will be given to simulate a regular chapter meeting. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one team that must be composed of four or five people. Team members should assume the roles of president, vice-‐president, secretary, treasurer, and an additional member if a fifth member is competing. No more than two team members entering the regional/state event may have participated at a previous National Leadership Conference. The two teams with the highest average score will represent the region in the state event. The underclassman who makes the highest score on the state parliamentary procedure written test and fills out a state officer application will become Parliamentarian of the State Chapter. This individual may or may not be a member of the State Team. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The team score is determined by averaging the scores of its members. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test on the previously listed Content will be administered online prior to the State Leadership Conference. The team score is determined by averaging the scores of its members. Five teams with the highest average scores on this written test will be scheduled for a performance test. Finalist for the performance portion of the event will be announced at the conclusion of the opening session of the State Leadership Conference. Performance. Members of the five finalist teams will meet for instructions and time assignments twenty (20) minutes before the first performance is scheduled to begin. The team’s president will receive an envelope containing a copy of the problem for each team member. The team may use the preparation

148 2016–2017

time to consider procedure. Parliamentary procedure reference materials may be used during this preparation period, but not during the performance itself. Performances must include presentation of procedures that are used in a complete regular meeting of the chapter from the time the meeting is called to order until it is adjourned. Items designated in the problem must be included in the appropriate order of business, but other items should also be taken up during the meeting. The following items may be taken into the preparation room and may be used in the performance room: a copy of the problem for each team member (given in the preparation room), an agenda for the meeting, the treasurer’s report, and a copy of the minutes from a preceding meeting. Participants are not to write on the copy of the problem or the meeting agenda. The problem may or may not include each class of motions, but all five classes of motions—main, subsidiary, privileged, incidental, and motions that bring a question again before the assembly—must be demonstrated during the performance. Performance time may be from 9 to 11 minutes. A timekeeper will stand at 8 minutes. When each team is finished, the time used will be recorded, noting a deduction of one point for each full half minute less than 8:31 minutes or each full half minute more than 11:29 minutes. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. The performance portion of the event will be evaluated by a panel of judges. Judges’ decisions will be based on the most recent edition of Robert’s Rules of Order. All decisions of the judges are final. Final rank will be determined by a weighting of 20 percent for the team average test score and 80 percent for the team performance score. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Parliamentary Authority Reference Robert, Henry M. III. Robert’s Rules of Order. Glenview, Illinois: Scott Foresman and Company.

Points for Participation Regional: First 8 State: First 8 Second 7 Second 7 Third 6 Third 6 Participant 5 Fourth 5 Fifth 4 State Team Member 3 National Recognition 5

149 2016–2017

Parliamentary Procedure Performance Rating Sheet

Motions: Deduct one (1) point for each mistake in each classification.

Motions Classification Comments Value Score

Main 6 Subsidiary 6 Privileged 6 Incidental 6 Bring Again 6 Motions Performance Subtotal Business of the Meeting

Problem quality (concise, complete, clear, germane) 15 Directions followed 5 Other business quality 10 Business of the Meeting Performance Subtotal General Parliamentary Procedure

Proper order of business 10 Proper use of parliamentary terms 10 Clarity of expression and voice projection 5 Impartiality of presiding official 5 Initiative of members 5 Poise, dignity, and appearance 5 General Parliamentary Procedure Performance Subtotal Subtotal /100 max.

Time Penalty Deduct one (1) point per full half minute less than 8:31 or more than 11:29 minutes. Time:

Penalty Deduct five (5) points for failure to follow the guidelines.



Objective Test Score (To be used in the event of a tie) Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

150 2016–2017

Partnership with Business Project This event recognizes FBLA chapters that develop and implement the most innovative, creative, and effective partnership plan for increasing sustained communication and interaction with the Business and Information Technology community. Content This project is designed to increase the number of chapters working in partnership with local businesses. The report should describe the planning and implementation of activities that exposed FBLA members to the characteristics and responsibilities of successful businesses and their leaders. Eligibility Each local chapter may submit one report. This is a state and national event only. Reports will be uploaded in PDF format to the SLC submission site by the date established annually. Regulations The report format must adhere to the following guidelines. General

• The report must be prepared by student members, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in a business style.

• The report must describe activities of the local chapter that were conducted between the previous year’s State Leadership Conference and the current year’s State Leadership Conference.

• One copy of the report must be uploaded to the SLC submission link by an exact date to be established annually.

• Entries not adhering to these regulations will be disqualified. • Reports will not be returned to chapters. Report Contents • The report must include a table of contents. A title page, divider pages, and appendices are


appendices. Front covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8½" by 11". • The report may be single-‐ or double-‐spaced. • The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. Report Covers • Front covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the event, and

the year in which the report is entered. • Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit.

151 2016–2017

Procedure The report format must follow the same sequence shown on the rating sheet. If information is not available for a particular criterion, a statement to that effect should be included in the report. The report must be similar to that of a business report with substantiated statements in a clear and concise format. Reports will be prejudged according to the following rating sheet. The top ten scored reports will present at the state leadership conference. Up to three (3) members from each local chapter will give a seven (7)-‐minute oral abstract of the project. Visual aids and audiovisual equipment may be used. A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and at seven (7) minutes. Points will be deducted for any time more than seven (7) minutes. Following the presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer session. Creativity through design and use of meaningful graphics is encouraged. Regulations 1. The report must adhere to the following guidelines:

Report Contents • There should be a table of contents with page numbers. • Follow the RATING SHEET sequence in writing the report. If information is not available for a

particular criterion, include a statement to that effect in the report. • Pages are numbered and must be on 8½" by 11". • Reports must not exceed 15 pages excluding the front cover and the description. (A title page, divider

pages, and appendices are optional and must be included in the page count.) Report Covers • Report covers are not counted against the page limit and may contain other information. • Front cover contains the following information: name of student(s), name of school, state, name of the

event, and year. 2. The report must be prepared by student member(s), not advisers. Advisers should serve as

consultants to ensure that the report is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in an acceptable business style.

3. Reports will not be returned to the chapter. 4. Internet access is not provided. Judging Reports will be judged at the state level. Chapters receiving the top ten (10) scores will present a seven (7)-‐ minute oral abstract of the project. Visual aids and audiovisual equipment may be used. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number is five (5). The first-‐place award is sponsored by the Virginia Business Education Association.

152 2016–2017

Points for Participation State: First 10 Second 9 Third 8 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 Participant 5 National Recognition 5

153 2016–2017

Partnership with Business Project Report Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Report Content

Development Description of the partnership goals 0 1–2 3–4 5

Description of the planning activities used to build a partnership 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Roles of business leaders and chapter members in developing the partnership 0 1–2 3–4 5

Implementation Description of the activities implemented to learn concepts of business operations

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Roles of business leaders and chapter members in implementing the project 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Results, concepts learned, and impact of the project provided 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Degree of Involvement (e.g., hours spent, personal contact, and executives and department heads contacted)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Examples of publicity and recognition received as a result of the partnership 0 1–2 3–4 5

Report Format

Clear and concise presentation with logical arrangements of information following the rating sheet categories

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional report design appropriate to audience 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max. Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not adhering to report guidelines (maximum of twenty [20] points): cover incorrect missing table of contents more than fifteen (15) pages no page numbers report format does not follow rating sheet Total Points /100 max.

School


Judge’s Comments:

154 2016–2017

Partnership with Business Project Performance Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Description of project development and strategies used to implement the partnership 0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Degree of chapter involvement in the project 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Explain roles of business leaders and chapter members in implementing the project 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Information learned from management (i.e., business planning, organization, motivation, control, objectives, and goal setting)

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Evidence of publicity received 0 1–2 3–4 5 Student evaluation of project effectiveness 0 1–2 3–4 5 Delivery

Statements well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, assertiveness, and good projection 0 1–2 3–4 5


Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation more than seven (7) minutes. Time:





Final Score (add total points and report score) /200 max. School


Judge’s Comments:

155 2016–2017

Personal Finance Financial literacy is essential in meeting the financial challenges of the 21st century. This event recognizes students who possess essential knowledge and skills related to financial issues, can analyze the rights and responsibilities of consumers, and apply knowledge to financial situations. Content The written objective test may include questions on the financial principles related to personal decision making, earning a living (income, taxes), managing budgets and finance, saving and investing, buying goods and services, banking, credit, and insurance. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level; 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Test will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

156 2016–2017

Publication Design Knowledge of desktop publishing is vital in many aspects of today’s business publications. This event provides recognition to FBLA members who can most effectively demonstrate skills in the areas of desktop publishing, creativity, and decision making. Content Participants should be prepared to create, design, and produce usable copy on a computer using desktop publishing software. In addition, participants will be tested on their understanding and mastery of basic desktop terminology and concepts, desktop layout rules, and related desktop publishing application and knowledge. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one (1) individual or one (1) team composed of no more than two (2) members in the regional event. One team member may have placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference. First-‐place regional winners will advance to the state leadership conference. 2017 Topic Create a publication portfolio promoting a new, member (subscription network such as Netflix or HBO) original TV series or movie. The portfolio should include a poster, character cutout design, ¼ page newspaper advertisement, and three additional promotional products. Everything should meet “G” rating requirements. Procedure Region* and State

• The event is to highlight print publications. • Visual aids and samples specifically related to the project may be used in the presentation;

however, no items may be left with the judges or audience. • Competitors may bring copies of printed materials designed for presentation. • Comply with state and federal copyright laws. • The presentation should include the team’s objective toward the topic; the script writing process;

use of different video techniques; a list of equipment and software used; and copyright issues with pictures, music, or other items.

• Competitors will have five (5) minutes for equipment set-‐up. Presentations should last for a maximum of seven (7) minutes with a six (6) minute warning. Following the presentation, the judges will conduct a three (3) minute Q & A.

• First-‐place regional winners will advance to the State Leadership Conference. First-‐ and second-‐place state winners will advance to the National Leadership Conference.

* Regional Directors may choose to have submissions sent electronically. Judging All decisions of the judges are final.

157 2016–2017


158 2016–2017

Publication Design Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the event topic and promotional materials 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Explains the design and development process 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Creates interest and desire of the design for target audience 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Clear connection to theme throughout materials 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Incorporates a consistency in products to theme 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Include correct grammar, punctuation, spelling, and information related to event topic 0 1–2 3–4 5

Delivery

Statements are well organized and clearly stated 0 1–2 3–4 5


Demonstrates active participation and the ability to effectively answer questions 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /100 max.






159 2016–2017

Public Service Announcement Public service ads (PSA) or public service announcements are basic messages to the public that raise awareness on a specific social issue. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate the ability to research a topic (issue) and create an original and informative thirty (30) second PSA video, raising awareness and/or evoking a changed attitude toward the issue. Overview Participants are expected to research and form an objective on a given topic, create a script and a 30-‐second video. 2017 Topic Develop a public service announcement that addresses the safety and security surrounding the use of drones. Copyright and Fair Use Information It is the policy of FBLA-‐PBL to comply with state and federal copyright laws. Refer to the Format Guide. Project Guidelines

• Participants must research and form an objective on the given topic (social issue). Student members, not advisers, must prepare the presentations.

• Presentations should be 30 seconds in length. • The video production may use any method to capture or create moving images. • Members are expected to follow all applicable copyright laws.

Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as national winners must register for the RLC/SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed.

• The presentation is an explanation of the topic research, script development, and video production development, and video production.

• The PSA must be shown to the judges (regional directors may choose to have announcements recorded and submitted electronically),

• The presentation should include, but not be limited to: the team’s objective toward the topic, major findings from the topic research, the script writing process, use of different video techniques, a list of equipment and software used; and copyright issues with pictures, music or other items.


• Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges. • Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment and/or presentation items. • The following will be provided: Internet, screen, power, table. • Teams will have five (5) minutes to describe the project and show their video.

160 2016–2017

• At the end of four (4) minutes, a timekeeper will stand until noticed indicating one minute is left, and at five (5) minutes the timekeeper will stand indicating time is up.

• Following each presentation, judges will conduct a (3) minute question-‐answer period. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries may be created by an individual member or by a team, not to exceed three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. For team entries, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous State or National Leadership Conference. Procedure (Regional and State)*

• Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation at the SLC; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as winners must register for the SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed.

• The presentation is an explanation of the topic research, script development, and video production.

• The PSA must be shown to the judges. The presentation should include, but not be limited to: the team’s objective toward the topic, major findings from the topic research, the script writing process, use of different video techniques, a list of equipment and software used; and copyright issues with pictures, music or other items.


• Visual aids related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience.

• Five (5) minutes will be allowed to set up and remove equipment and/or presentation items. • The following will be provided: Internet, screen, power, and table. • Teams will have five (5) minutes to describe the project and show their video. • The timekeeper will stand at four (4) and five (5) minutes. When the presentation is finished, the

timekeeper will record the time used, noting a deduction of five (5) points for any time more thanfive (5) minutes.

• Following each presentation, judges will conduct a (3) minute question-‐answer period. * Regional Directors may choose to have presentations recorded. Judging A panel of judges will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

161 2016–2017


162 2016–2017

Public Service Announcement Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Video Presentation

Topic (social issue) fully and properly researched and demonstrated in video

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Video is clear and concise (does not exceed 30 seconds)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Elements included in PSA video are suitable, appropriate, and directed towards a specific audience

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Audio and visual elements coordinated and complimentary

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Video is effective at informing and/or evoking a changed attitude towards the issue

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Presentation shows creativity and originality 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Presentation includes an effective opening, body, and conclusion

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Transitions are effective and appealing 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Audio Editing

• Good quality • Appropriate volume

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Proper Use of Video Technology • Video uses multiple camera angles • Video is smooth and steady • Video is in focus

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Titles and graphics enhance overall quality of presentation

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Delivery

Thoughts and statements are well organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language used

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection

0 1–2 3–4 5


0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /150 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation more than five (5) minutes. Time:




School


Judge’s Comments:

163 2016–2017

Public Speaking I This event recognizes FBLA members who are beginning to develop qualities of business and information technology leadership by developing effective speaking skills. Content The content of the four (4)-‐minute speech must be of a business nature and must be developed from one or more of the nine FBLA-‐PBL goals. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐place regional winner is eligible for state competition. Only members enrolled in grades 9 and 10 are eligible for this event. Regulations 1. The speech should be four (4) minutes in length, of a business nature, and must be developed from

one or more of the nine FBLA-‐PBL goals. 2. Each participant’s speech must be the result of his/her own efforts. Facts and working data may be

secured from any source. The speech must be prepared by the student member, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the speech is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in a business style.

3. When delivering the speech, the participant may use notes or note cards. 4. No visual aids may be used. 5. No microphone will be used. Procedure Participants will report for instructions and random selection of speaking times shortly before the first speech. At the time of the performance, the event administrator will introduce the participant by name only. Each speech should be four (4) minutes in length. A timekeeper will stand at three (3) minutes. When the speaker is finished, the timekeeper will record the time used by the participant, noting a deduction of five points for any time less than 3:31 or more than4:29. Judging Participants’ speeches will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

164 2016–2017


165 2016–2017

Public Speaking I Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Obvious incorporation of FBLA-‐PBL goals 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Memorable central theme stated and repeated 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Supporting information is accurate and appropriate

0 1–2 3–4 5

Organization

Immediate introduction of topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Strong support (body) for topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Effective and memorable conclusion 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Delivery

Extemporaneous delivery; i.e., not merely read from a script or notes

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional tone, appropriate language (inflection, pace, emphasis, and enthusiasm)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, eye contact, and appropriate gestures

0 1–2 3–4 5

Presentation is sincere, engaging, interesting, original, creative, and convincing

0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /100 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentation less than 3:31 or more than 4:29 minutes. Time:




Name

School


Judge’s Comments:

166 2016–2017

Public Speaking II This event recognizes FBLA members who, through public speaking, demonstrate qualities of Business and Information Technology leadership by presenting a well-‐organized, logical, and substantial speech. Content The content of the five (5)-‐minute speech must be of a business nature and must be developed from one or more of the nine FBLA-‐PBL goals. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐place regional winner is eligible for state competition. Regulations 1. The speech should be five (5) minutes in length, of a business nature, and must be developed from

one or more of the nine FBLA-‐PBL goals. 2. Each participant’s speech must be the result of his/her own efforts. Facts and working data may be

secured from any source. The speech must be prepared by the student member, not advisers. Advisers should serve as consultants to ensure that the speech is well organized, contains substantiated statements, and is written in a business style.

3. When delivering the speech, the participant may use notes or note cards. 4. No visual aids may be used. 5. No microphone will be used. Procedure Participants will report for instructions and random selection of speaking times shortly before the first speech. At the time of the performance, the event administrator will introduce the participant by name only. Each speech should be five (5) minutes in length. A timekeeper will stand at four (4) minutes. When the speaker is finished, the timekeeper will record the time used by the participant, noting a deduction of five points for any time less than 4:31 or more than5:29. Judging Participants’ speeches will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

167 2016–2017


168 2016–2017

Public Speaking II Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Obvious incorporation of FBLA-‐PBL goals 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Memorable central theme stated and repeated 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Supporting information is accurate and appropriate

0 1–2 3–4 5

Organization

Immediate introduction of topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Strong support (body) for topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Effective and memorable conclusion 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Delivery

Extemporaneous delivery; i.e., not merely read from a script or notes

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Professional tone, appropriate language (inflection, pace, emphasis, and enthusiasm)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Demonstrates self-‐confidence, poise, eye contact, and appropriate gestures

0 1–2 3–4 5

Presentation is sincere, engaging, interesting, original, creative, and convincing

0 1–2 3–4 5

Subtotal /100 max.

Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations less than 4:31 or more than 5:29 minutes. Time:




Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

169 2016–2017

Sales Presentation Participation in this event will allow the individuals to demonstrate proficiency in selling techniques, merchandise knowledge, and presenting to the customer. Participants will sell a product or concept to the judges of their choice. Project Guidelines

• The individual shall provide the necessary materials and merchandise for the demonstration along with the product.

• Each participant’s demonstration must be the result of his/her own efforts. Facts and working data may be secured from any source.

• Student members, not advisers, must prepare the demonstration. • Visual aids and samples related to the presentation may be used in the presentation; however, no

items may be left with the judges or audience. • Dress code must be followed. • When delivering the demonstration, the participant may use notes, note cards, and props. All

materials must be removed at the end of the performance. Procedure Regional and State

• The individual must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g. speaking, setup, operating equipment). Other members of the chapter may not provide assistance.

• Competitors will have five (5) minutes for equipment setup. • The individual has seven (7) minutes to interact with a panel of judges and sell the product or

concept. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. • Following the presentation, the judges will conduct a three-‐ (3-‐) minute Q&A. • First-‐place regional winner will advance to the State Leadership Conference.

Judging Participants’ speeches will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

170 2016–2017

Sales Presentation Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Approach

Suitable opening statement or remark 0 1–2 3–4 5 Direct customer’s attention to merchandise 0 1–2 3–4 5 Product Presentation

Questions involved customer 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Analyze and determine customer needs 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Interest in customer as an individual 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Adequate knowledge of product features 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Creates interest and desire for product 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Benefits matched to customer needs 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Suggestion Selling

Suggested selling used 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Handling Objections

Welcomes and listens to all objections 0 1–2 3–4 5 Closing

Takes advantage of customer reactions 0 1–2 3–4 5 Handles and overcomes objections with respect 0 1–2 3–4 5 Closes the sale 0 1–2 3–4 5





Name

School


Judge’s Comments:

171 2016–2017

Securities and Investments Content The written objective test will consist of items related to investment fundamentals, personal investing, retirement and estate planning, the financial services industry, financial assets and markets, financial services regulation, the stock market, and mutual funds. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter two members in the regional event; however only one participant will be eligible to place in the top three. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure A written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. The test will be 50 minutes at regional level, 60 minutes at state level. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e., Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 5 State: First 5 Second 4 Second 4 Third 3 Third 3 Participant 2 Fourth 2 Fifth 1 National Recognition 5

172 2016–2017

Social Media Campaign Overview Social media is changing the way businesses communicate with customers and prospects and how they promote products and services. Effectively using social media as a marketing channel is a crucial component of any strategic marketing plan. This event consists of a presentation given at the NLC. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry created by an individual or team of two (2) or three (3) members from active local chapters, on record in the national center as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. No more than one (1) team member may have competed in this event at a prior NLC. 2017 Topic Create a social media marketing campaign to create buzz surrounding an upcoming, new, member (subscription network such as Netflix or HBO) original TV series or movie. Use a minimum of three different social media platforms. Everything should meet “G” rating requirements. Procedure Regional and State

• The presentation is an explanation of the topic. • The individual or team members must perform all aspects of the presentations. Other

representatives of the chapter may not provide assistance. • Visual aids and samples specifically related to the project may be used; however, no items may be

left with the judges. • Teams will have seven (7) minutes to present and five (5) minutes to set up and remove the

equipment. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) and seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question-‐answer period. • First-‐place regional winner will advance to the State Leadership Conference.

Judging Participants’ speeches will be evaluated by a panel of judges. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards is three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 7 State: First 7 Second 6 Second 6 Third 5 Third 5 Participant 4 Fourth 4 Fifth 3 National Recognition 5

173 2016–2017

Social Media Campaign Performance Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Design and Distribution

Overall campaign is aesthetically appealing 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Campaign is consistent across all platforms 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Campaign shows creativity, originality, and supports theme

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

High level of interactivity and engagement 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Content

Product/service message is clear 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Theme fully and effectively developed. Solution adequately addresses assigned topic

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Explains the development, creative design, implementation, and distribution process

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Benefits matched to customer and prospect needs 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Copyright information note, if applicable 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Presentation/Delivery

Graphic design, when used, shows creativity, originality, and supports the campaign

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Additional technologies are used appropriately (e.g. videos, linked social media pages)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Campaign elements gain attention and have eye appeal

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Format is consistent and appropriate 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Statements are well organized and appropriate 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Participants demonstrate self-‐confidence, poise, and good voice projection

0 1–2 3–4 5

Demonstrate the ability to effectively answer questions

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.





Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

174 2016–2017

Spreadsheet Applications This event recognizes FBLA state chapters that spreadsheet skills are necessary to convert data to information in business. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate that they have acquired skills for spreadsheet development in business. Content Regionally, this event is composed of one (1) part: an objective test. State competitors will also take the objective test and a school-‐site computer spreadsheet applications test. Participants should be well prepared in basic mathematical concepts as well as data organization concepts. Participants should be prepared to utilize data by creating formulas, using functions, generating graphs for analysis purposes, using pivot tables, creating macros, and filtering and extracting data. The objective test participants may be tested on their knowledge of data-‐entry techniques, editing capabilities, creating formulas, using functions, (including those containing absolute values), formatting, charting, and analyzing chart data. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional Objective Test. A 50-‐minute written objective test based on the previously listed Content will be administered. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Calculators may be used in all written events as appropriate; however, no graphing calculators, PDAs (i.e. Palm Pilots), phones, or other memory-‐storage devices are allowed in any event. State Objective Test. A 60-‐minute written objective test on the previously listed Content will be administered. Participants will also complete a school-‐site computer spreadsheet application production test. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers; for both portions of this event, they may use their own cordless calculators that are noiseless. Judging Tests will be hand-‐ or machine-‐graded. Ties will be broken based on the order in which the tests are returned. All judges’ decisions are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level.

175 2016–2017


176 2016–2017

State Service Project Project ASK is the FBLA-‐PBL State Service Project. ASK, Association for the Support of Children with Cancer, is a non-‐profit association of parents, health professionals, and concerned citizens throughout Virginia. FBLA-‐PBL’s support of Project ASK allows the organization to conduct diagnostic research, fund the position for a patient counselor/chaplain, and serve as a support group for families of children with cancer. Eligibility All local chapters are eligible to participate in the financial phase and/or the public information phase of the project. Attendance at the State Leadership Conference is not required. There are no regional eliminations. Report forms necessary for participation in Project ASK are sent to local chapters in a special mailing. Financial Phase Each FBLA chapter making a monetary contribution to Project ASK will be recognized with a Certificate of Appreciation at the State Leadership Conference. In order for local chapters to receive points for participation and to be eligible for a certificate, the Project ASK Report Form must be submitted to the FBLA State Office two to three weeks prior to the State Leadership Conference, by an exact date to be established annually. Those chapters making the largest regional contributions and the largest statewide contribution will receive plaques at the State Leadership Conference. Publication Information Phase 1. Projects chosen should focus on the roles FBLA members can play in educating their peers and the

general public about childhood cancer and the ASK organization. These projects should be directed toward generating public interest in ASK and its purposes.

2. Projects can involve FBLA members, other young people, school faculty and administrators, medical personnel, ASK members, and Business and Information Technology and community leaders.

3. The report must describe activities conducted between the previous year’s State Leadership Conference and the current year’s State Leadership Conference.

4. The report format must adhere to the following guidelines: Report Contents • The report must include a table of contents. A title page, divider pages, and appendices are optional. • The report must not exceed 10 pages, including the title page, table of contents, divider pages, and

appendices. Front and back covers are not counted in the page limit. • Pages must be standard 8½" by 11" paper. • Pages must not be laminated or in sheet protectors. • The report may be single- or double-spaced. • Each side of the paper providing information is counted as a page. • Valuable items should not be included with the report. Copies, rather than important original documents,

should be sent. • Quality reproductions, including photocopies and/or halftones, are acceptable. No items are acceptable

that have been pasted on/attached to pages within the report. • Scrapbooks and loose or bulky exhibits are not acceptable. Report Covers • Both front and back covers are required. • Front cover must contain the name of the chapter, the chapter’s city and state, the name of the event, and

the year in which the report is entered.

177 2016–2017

• Covers may include information but are not counted in the page limit. • Report covers must have a weight such as cover stock, index stock, or card stock. Covers may not be

laminated. • Two- or three-ring covers, hardback notebooks, or plastic covers are not acceptable. • Covers must not exceed 9" by 12". • All reports must be bound (e.g., tape or spiral binding).

5. One copy of the project report must be submitted to the FBLA State Office two-‐to-‐three weeks prior to the State Leadership Conference, by an exact date to be established annually.

6. Entries not adhering to these regulations will be disqualified. 7. Reports will not be returned to chapters. Judging Project ASK financial records maintained by the FBLA-‐PBL Specialist will be audited prior to the State Leadership Conference to determine chapters making contributions to the project. The public information reports will be reviewed by a screening committee to determine whether chapters have complied with event eligibility and regulations. A panel of judges that will include ASK representatives will select the winners. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards for the financial phase is 12; for the public information phase, 5. Points for Participation (Financial Phase) Local Chapter Contribution:

10 points

Largest Regional Contribution:

4 additional points

Largest State Contribution:

3 additional points

Points for Participation (Public Information Phase) State: First 10 Second 9 Third 8 Fourth 7 Fifth 6 Participant 5

178 2016–2017

Website Design This event recognizes local chapters that promote FBLA local, state, and national activities through the development and maintenance of a Web site. Utilizing technology to communicate with members and the general community significantly enhances a chapter’s ability to promote its activities, members, and the ideals of FBLA-‐PBL. Content 2017 Topic Develop a website for a new Family Entertainment Center (FEC) opening in a city with a population of approximately 200,000. Name the FEC. The FEC will be offering a variety of activities of your choice with a snack bar. The FEC will offer party packages to their customers. The website should allow customers to check availability for parties and make party reservations online. The site should also include a contact page. Eligibility Each chapter may submit one (1) entry. The first-‐place regional winner will compete at the state level. Entries must be created by an individual or a team of two (2) or three (3) members. Participants must be members of an active local chapter and be on record in the FBLA-‐PBL national office as having paid dues by March 1 of the current school year. In the event of a team submission, no more than one (1) member may have competed in this event at a previous National Leadership Conference. Procedure Regional 1. Regional Directors will determine due date for regional substitutions; URL and Statement of

Assurance are required. 2. Entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. 3. The website must be available for viewing on the Internet at the time of judging. No changes may be

made to the website after the official entry date. 4. Any photographs, text, trademarks, or names that are used on the site must be supported by proper

documentation and approvals. Members are expected to follow all applicable copyright laws and may be disqualified if items are used inappropriately.

5. Websites should be designed to allow for viewing on as many different platforms as possible. State Prejudged Project 1. Regional Directors will submit regional winning entries; no edits may be made between regional and

state conferences. 2. Entries will be judged according to the rating sheet. Performance (Regional winners will present at the State Leadership Conference)

• Participants will have five (5) minutes to set up equipment. • Chapters must provide all presentation equipment. A screen and equipment table will be

provided. Competitors will be given five (5) minutes to set up equipment. • The presentation is an explanation of the Web site, and the Web site may be shown to the judges

when explaining the site. The teams or individuals will be able to access their URL. The explanation should include, but not be limited to, development of the topic, development and

179 2016–2017

design process, use and implementation of innovative technology, use and development of media elements, and copyright issues with pictures, music, and other items.

• Presentation of the entry must be conducted by participants who authored the event. In the case of a team event, at least one author must give the presentation at the SLC; however, all team members who wish to be recognized as state winners must register for the SLC. No replacement or substitutes will be allowed. The individual or team members must perform all aspects of the presentation (e.g., speaking, setup, operating audiovisual equipment). Other representatives of the chapter may not provide assistance. Visual aids and samples specifically related to the project may be used; however, no items may be left with the judges or audience.

• The individual or team has seven (7) minutes to present. • A timekeeper will stand at six (6) minutes and seven (7) minutes. • Following each presentation, judges will conduct a three (3) minute question/answer period.


180 2016–2017

Website Design Production Rating Sheet



Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Page Layout and Design

Overall design is aesthetically appealing 0 1–7 8–14 15–20 Design is consistent across all pages 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Design shows creativity, originality, and supports theme

0 1–7 8–14 15–20

Design maintains a high level of usability 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Content

Proper use of grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Copyright laws have been followed, permissions are cited on the website.

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Product/service message is clear 0 1–10 11–20 21–30 Theme fully and effectively developed. Solution adequately addresses assigned topic

0 1–10 11–20 21–30

Technical

Site is compatible with multiple platforms 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Overall code—readability, white space, semantic, efficient, separation of structure

0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Site interactivity functions and is error-‐free 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Additional technologies are used appropriately( e.g., Flash, JavaScript, etc.)

0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Site is compatible with multiple browser variants 0 1–3 4–7 8–10

Subtotal /200 max.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points each for not following guidelines.

Penalty Points Deduct five (5) points for not submitting a Statement of Assurance.


Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

181 2016–2017

Website Design (For state competition only) Performance Rating Sheet

Evaluation Item Not


Meets Expectations


Points Earned

Content

Describes the development of the topic 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Explains the development and design process 0 1–5 6–10 11–15 Explains the use of your social media elements and why they were selected 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Explains the development of media elements (e.g., graphics, video, audio, etc.) 0 1–5 6–10 11–15

Copyright information is noted in credits. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10 Delivery

Statements are well-‐organized and clearly stated; appropriate business language is used. 0 1–3 4–7 8–10



Subtotal /100 max. Time Penalty Deduct five (5) points for presentations more than seven (7) minutes. Time:





Final Score (add total points and prejudged score) /300 max. Name(s)

School


Judge’s Comments:

182 2016–2017

Who’s Who in FBLA This event honors FBLA members who have made outstanding contributions to the association at the local, regional, state, and national levels. Eligibility Each local chapter may nominate one member. The nominee must • be a senior • submit the official application to the FBLA State Office two to three weeks prior to the State

Leadership Conference, by an exact date to be established annually • complete the Future level of the Business Achievement Awards. State officers automatically earn recognition in this event; therefore, having a state officer does not prohibit a chapter from selecting an additional member for this honor. Regulations No more than one percent of the membership will receive this award at the state level. Procedure Criteria for selection of a nominee must include • years of participation in FBLA activities • extent of participation in regional, state, and national conferences • offices, chairmanships, and committee memberships held • contributions to local, state, and national projects • participation in other activities • recommendations supportive of the member’s involvement in FBLA. Judging Applications will be reviewed in the FBLA State Office for adherence to the stated criteria for nomination. A panel of judges will select those to be recognized as recipients of Virginia Who’s Who in FBLA awards. Of those selected, one person will be chosen to represent Virginia at the National Leadership Conference. All decisions of the judges are final. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. Forms relating to Who’s Who in FBLA can also be found in Appendix F. Points for Participation State: Winner 5 Participant 2 National Recognition 5

183 2016–2017

Word Processing Word processing skills are necessary to obtain information processing positions in the business and information technology industry. This event recognizes FBLA members who demonstrate that they have acquired entry-‐level skills for word processing positions in business and information technology. Content Participants should be well prepared in basic keyboard knowledge and in the production of letters, memorandums, reports, tabulations, résumés, and material from rough drafts and unarranged copy. Documents should adhere to the National Format Guide. Chapters may elect to use voice-‐recognition programs for their skill event competitions. However, the chapter must apply the voice-‐recognition software, a laptop computer, and all peripherals. In addition, participants will be tested on their understanding and mastery of documents, grammar, punctuation, spelling, proofreading, basic keyboarding terminology and concepts, and related application knowledge. Eligibility Each local chapter may enter one member in the regional event. A participant who placed first or second in this event at a previous State Leadership Conference or represented Virginia at a previous National Leadership Conference is not eligible. First-‐ and second-‐place regional winners are eligible for state competition. Procedure Regional At the regional level, only a production test will be administered. One hour will be allowed for this test, including time for general directions and equipment setup. Participants must recognize the necessity for accurate proofreading. Documents should adhere to the National Format Guide. Word-‐division manuals and dictionaries may be used as reference materials. State The production portion of this event will be administered prior to the State Leadership Conference. One hour will be allowed for the test, including time for general directions, and equipment setup. Participants must recognize the necessity for accurate proofreading. Documents should adhere to the National Format Guide. Word-‐division manuals and dictionaries may be used as reference materials. A 60-‐minute written objective test based on previously written content and basic skills knowledge will be administered at the State Leadership Conference. Participants must furnish their own no. 2 pencils and erasers. Judging The state objective test will be machine-‐scored and will constitute 15 percent of the final score. Judging of the production test will be based on mailable copy. Documents will be evaluated by a panel of judges. Judges will use the National Format Guide to evaluate materials. All decisions of the judges are

184 2016–2017

final. At the state level, the production portion of this event will constitute 85 percent of the final score. Ties will be broken based on the scores associated with the objective test portion of the event. Awards The number of awards presented will be determined by the judges and/or number of entries. The maximum number of awards will be three (3) at the regional level; five (5) at the state level. Points for Participation Regional: First 6 State: First 6 Second 5 Second 5 Third 4 Third 4 Participant 3 Fourth 3 Fifth 2 National Recognition 5 See Format Guide.

CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) · 2016–2017 ’ CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) ......

Documents

Transcript of CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) · 2016–2017 ’ CompetitiveEvents—HighSchoolLevel) ......