Competitive Advantage through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Professor David Eaton
-
Upload
school-of-the-built-environment-university-of-salford -
Category
Education
-
view
914 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Competitive Advantage through Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Professor David Eaton
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE THROUGH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Professor David EatonUniversity of Salford, UK
PVPLS SoBE Lecture Series5TH DECEMBER 2011
INTRODUCTIONStructure of Presentation:
– Definition of CSR;– Scope of Industry;– Definition of CA;– Difficulties of defining CA;
– Methodology – by case study;
– Outputs and Benefits.
CSR DEFINITIONSCSR – Business exceeding the legal or
commercial expectations of society in the management of economic, social, and environmental impacts;
CSR – delivering the TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE; economic, social and environmental
CSR – Revised Methodology
– Sextuple Bottom Line – SLEEPT.
SocialLegalEconomicEnvironmentalPoliticalTechnological
SLEEPT: – Sextuple Bottom Line
Key Issues -1
Is Corporate Social Responsibility:–Accepted as important by business &
industry?;–Within the remit of a single business
entity?;–Incorporating features of ‘community’
concern?;–Incorporating issues of the ‘wider society?
CSR PERSPECTIVES
Pure PHILANTHROPY - ......
Rational Business Decision – Business Enlightened Self-Interest
PERSPECTIVES - 1
Stakeholder Levels:
–Systems;–Stakeholders;–Enterprise Cultures;–Globalisation.
PERSPECTIVES - 2Time Scales:
–Short term;–Medium term;–Long term;–Whole Life Cycles.
CSR CRITERIA of PUBLIC SECTOR
Anti-Corruption;
Sustainability;
Poverty Reduction;
Ubuntu ( Respect & Human Dignity).
CA
Definition-
Standard Models-–Canalised,–Neotenic,–Progenesic,–Parasitic,–BZ Oscillatory
FACTORS INVESTMENTINNOVATIO
NWEALTH
PROFIT
TIME
CA PROCESS
F Inv Inno W
Key:
F Factor
Inv Investment
Inno Innovation
W Wealth
TEMPORAL DEVELOPMENT: Standard Canalisation Evolution
F Inv Inno W
Key:
F Factor
Inv Investment
InnoInnovation
W Wealth
TEMPORAL DEVELOPMENT: Neotenic Evolution
Type1
Type2
F Inv Inno W
Key:
F Factor
Inv Investment
InnoInnovation
W Wealth
Progenesic Evolution
Type1
Type2
F1
F2
Inv1
FP InvP InnoP WP
Key:
F Factor
Inv Investment
InnoInnovation
W Wealth
Parasitic Evolution
FH InvH InnoH WH
Parasite
Host
B-Z OSCILLATORY
F Inv Inno W
Key:
F Factor
Inv Investment
Inno Innovation
W Wealth
(B-Z) Belousov-Zhabotinskii
TEMPORAL DEVELOPMENT: B-Z Oscillatory Evolution
Fig.5
Type1 Type2 Type3
QUALIFICATIONS & RESERVATIONS
Approximation of a Fuzzy & Complex Adaptive Dynamic Non-Linear system;
Zero Sum Process;
Limited to Rational Economic behaviour;
Appropriation by Ethical behaviour;
Negative Entropy;
Risk Transfer and Risk Profiles and VfM;
Mirror Congruence;
RISK PROFILE
RISK TRANSFER PROFILE
MIRROR CONGRUENCE
SPV GA
RTA VfM
Aff
RTAVfM
Aff
Reflection Mirror Axis
EXAMPLE
Dundee-Arbroath A92 Scotland
Reference details:
Claimed Benefits;
Triangulation;
Realisation;– Canalised,– Neotenic,– Progenesic,– Parasitic,– BZ Oscillatory.
REFERENCE DETAILS
Eaton, D and Akbiyikli, R. (2008) The Effect of Risk Transfer in PPP’s: An evaluation based on a UK Road Project. In Davis, H (Ed) Infrastructure Finance: Trends and Techniques. Euromoney, New York. (2008)
Eaton, D & Akbiyikli, R. Innovation in PPP. Book Chapter Ed by A Akintoye & Beck. Blackwells. (2008)
Eaton, D. (2008) Creating an Accurate Risk Register Encompassing Lucid Tender Requirements and Its Importance in Construction Competition. Marcus Evans, Prague.
Eaton, D. Public Private Partnerships. (2008) In Udrzitelny Rozvoj V Oblasti Spravy Majetku, (Environmental Issues of Development) Ed by Beran and Casensky, Pp245-250. ISBN80-01-03578-6. CVUT v Praze.
REFERENCES (CONT’D) Akbiyikli, R. Eaton, D. & Dikmen, U. (2010) Private Finance Initiative (PFI) for Road Projects in the UK – Current Practice with a case study. Traffic and Transportation Journal PROMET, Zagreb, Croatia. (SCI Indexed Journal)
Akbiyikli, R & Eaton, D. (2010) A Conceptual Framework for Operation and Maintenance Management in PFI Road Projects in the UK. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, JCEM Vilnius Lithuania. (SCI Indexed Journal)
Akbiyikli, R. Eaton, D. & Dikmen, U. (2010) Sustainable Construction and Private Finane Initiative Road Projects in the UK. Journal of Technological and Economical Development of Economy, JTEDE Vilnius Lithuania (SCI Indexed Journal)
Akbiyikli, R. Eaton, D. & Dikmen, U. (2010) Financing Road Projects by PFI: Current Practice in the UK Journal of Transport, Vilnius Lithuania. (SCI Indexed Journal)
Akbiyikli, R. Dikmen, U. & Eaton,D. (2010) Risks and Risk Management in Heavy Cost Construction Projects. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice ASCE USA (SCI Indexed Journal)
CLAIMED BENEFITS
Only way to do this! Been trying since 1966
Cost Saving – Approx 3%
Safety – No fatalities since opening
Environmental Improvements – landscaping and tree planting
TRIANGULATION
In-Situ Interviews;– ‘The Jewel’ in the GA Crown!–Revitalisation of linear corridor– Increased housing development– Increased employment opportunities–Road traffic improvements
• Flow times• Accident reduction
REALISATION–Canalised: road benefits–Neotenic: housing & social welfare
–Progenesic: new industry & employment
–Parasitic: trophic cascade–BZ Oscillatory: no evidence ++
REVIEW
Table 1: Public and Private Sector Attainment Matrix Beyond Traditional Procurement Mechanisms
PPP Criteria VfM Risk Transfer Resilience Affordability CSR Criteria Anti-corruption o + o + Sustainability + + + + Poverty reduction
o o + o
Ubuntu o o + o
Key + Positive outcome of criteria conjunction o No contribution above other procurement systems
CSA SUMMARY
ANTI-CORRUPTION – improved by Risk Transfer and Affordability characteristics of PPP;
SUSTAINABILITY – improved by VfM, Risk Transfer, Resilience and Affordability charateristics;
POVERTY REDUCTION – improved by Resilience characteristics;
UBUNTU – improved by Resilience characteristics.
CONCLUSION
Choice of Model;
Delivery of Model;
CSR – Clients and Industry: attainment;
CA – Clients and industry: achievement;
Multiple Reward Categories – SLEEPT – wider benefits than just economic!!!
CONCLUSION
Corporate responsibility for:Economics
EnvironmentSocial
VfMRisk Transfer
ResilienceAffordability
Private Sector
Public Sector
Impact on SocietyCorruption
SustainabilityPovertyUbuntu
Joint Venture
PPP
Whole Life Cycle
SystemsStakeholders
Enterprise cultureGlobalisation