Competing Priorities: Sustainability, Growth, and Innovation In Digital Collections

Competing Priorities: Sustainability, Growth, and Innovation In Digital Collections

Jenn RileyHead, Carolina Digital Library and ArchivesUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Are academic libraries like a forest?

Photo by erwlas.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/erwlas/32164

77632/

How can we manage growth?

Photo by aislinv. http://www.flickr.com/photos/aislinnv/446429071/

How can we manage change?

Photo by Nemo’s great uncle. http://www.flickr.com/photos/maynard/7

5485033/

A familiar story (broadly told)Administration’s perspective: We

need a fundamental change.

Front line librarians’ perspective:

We’re moving too slowly; I can’t

get the resources I need

to follow through on my

ideas.

Technical staff’s

perspective: We can’t take on

any more.

THE SYSTEMS

Basic premise: A well-planned, integrated set of software systems to support digital library work is the core of technical sustainability, and allows manageable growth and innovation.

Yep, we have this problem.

Photo by windsordi. http://www.flickr.com/photos/windsordi/3467758700/

What if it were more like this?

Photo by James UK. http://www.flickr.com/photos/jamesuk/503466376/

Access control Access control

Access copiesAccess copiesPreservation mastersPreservation mastersPreservation servicesPreservation services

Management/access layer

Storage/preservation layer

Access control

Object normalization/tr

ansformation

Object normalization/tr

ansformation

etc.etc. Streaming media

Streaming media

über discovery

system

über discovery

system

Discovery/delivery layer

Scalable image

delivery

Scalable image

delivery

Ingest prep

Ingest prep

PUBLIC-FACING TOOLS

INTERNALLY-FOCUSED TOOLS

Indexing

Ingest (add/update/delete/normalize content/metadata)


External repositories to which UNC contributes content

External repositories to which UNC contributes content

UN

C-MAN

AGED

SYSTEMS

Other object repositories with cool stuff

Other object repositories with cool stuff

ID resolution

ID resolution

Middleware services

MetadataMetadata

Specialized discovery/d

elivery system

Metadata/object

management interface

Metadata/object

management interface

Metadata creation

tools

Metadata creation

tools

Specialized content management& access systems

Specialized content management& access systems

Specialized content

management & access systems

Specialized content

management & access systems

Abstraction services for repository communication



Collection builder toolCollection

builder tool

Standard communication protocol or syndication of content

EXTERNALLY-M

ANAG

ED SYSTEM

S

ServicesWeb applications, with user interfaces. May cache data.

Storage

It’s a goal. Something to work towards.

Photo by Eddie van W.http://www.flickr.com/photos/spiritual_marketplace/2207966935/

Photo by Alex R. (rt48state). http://www.flickr.com/photos/rt48state/3756762770/

THE SERVICES

Basic premise: Digital library activities in 2012 aren’t just new collections projects. Instead, they should be broadly about providing services—to library staff, to students, to faculty, to the community.

Added value through partnerships

What types of services? Faculty outreach – research and teaching

Training – local systems and external technology

Data management consulting Institutional repository efforts Project planning/management Bringing the content and the tech together

THE PROCESS

Basic premise: Encourage planning, allow possible initiatives to be compared to one another, provide a path for ideas to reach fruition, ensure we can commit the resources necessary to succeed with those initiatives we do prioritize.

It’s not enough to have a good idea.

Receive proposal

Assign CDLA facilitator

Post proposal for CDLA/Systems/LT

C review

Report to LTC

Develop full project

proposal/timeline

Develop basic project

plan/timeline

Project/workflow/time

analysis

General estimate of required resources

Identify stakeholders

Preliminary decision on

proposal disposition

Candidate for fast-track approval

Require full LTC review

Approve and proceed

immediately

Report to LTCLTC semiannual review

Compare required

resources to available resources

Place in holding queue for priority if resource

availability changes

Resources become available

before next LTC review

Final decision on proposal disposition

Resources available

Resources not available

NoYes


Fast

-tra

ck a

ppro

val

Estimate of required resources

Absorb as part of non-project work

Receive proposal



C review

Report to LTC


proposal/timeline


plan/timeline


analysis







Approve and proceed

immediately


Compare required







Resources available


NoYes


Fast

-tra

ck a

ppro

val



For some initiatives, allow “fast track”

approval.

For some initiatives, allow “fast track”

approval.

Receive proposal



C review

Report to LTC


proposal/timeline


plan/timeline


analysis







Approve and proceed

immediately


Compare required







Resources available


NoYes


Fast

-tra

ck a

ppro

val



Develop a formal project plan.

Develop a formal project plan.

Receive proposal



C review

Report to LTC


proposal/timeline


plan/timeline


analysis







Approve and proceed

immediately


Compare required







Resources available


NoYes


Fast

-tra

ck a

ppro

val



“Facilitator” from the Carolina Digital

Library and Archives

“Facilitator” from the Carolina Digital

Library and Archives

Receive proposal



C review

Report to LTC


proposal/timeline


plan/timeline


analysis







Approve and proceed

immediately


Compare required







Resources available


NoYes


Fast

-tra

ck a

ppro

val



Role of assessment

Assessment is a current UNC Library priority New (30%) Assessment Coordinator Identified as a Library Technology Council priority for activities through end of 2012

Project plans required an assessment component

The assessment plans were pretty basic Formal assessment of the project proposal process underway

What happened in this review cycle We approved everything All proposals submitted at once Some proposals were able to move forward (relatively) quickly as fast-tracked

What we’ve learned (so far) Administrators happy with the planning done; see progress; happy to issue approvals

Proposers view process as too burdensome Current fast-track vs. full review setup has holes

Push more justification to the proposal stage

Planning phase isn’t enough for technical decisions in all cases

We need more assessment training Facilitating proposals is a lot of work!

What about agility?

Photo by radloff. http://www.flickr.com/photos/radloff/6708510227/

Next steps towards sustainability

Photo by Trevor Haldenby. http://www.flickr.com/photos/trevorh/491898939/

Thank you!

[email protected]

These slides:http://www.lib.unc.edu/users/jlril

ey/presentations/cni12s/rileySustainability.pptx

Competing Priorities: Sustainability, Growth, and Innovation In Digital Collections

Documents

Transcript of Competing Priorities: Sustainability, Growth, and Innovation In Digital Collections