Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

16
VP Shunt Patency Amanda Sachs, R.T. (MR) Nuclear Medicine Technology Directed Practice III College of Allied Health Sciences University of Cincinnati

Transcript of Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

Page 1: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

VP Shunt PatencyAmanda Sachs, R.T. (MR)

Nuclear Medicine Technology Directed Practice III

College of Allied Health SciencesUniversity of Cincinnati

Page 2: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

Anatomy Overview

Page 3: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ What is “VP”?○ Ventriculoperitoneal

■ shunt moves CSF from the ventricles to the peritoneum in the abdominal cavity where it can be absorbed

★ CSF shunts are placed, usually at a young age, to treat symptoms of hydrocephalus○ the shunt moves excess CSF fluid out of the ventricles

to decrease the amount of CSF in the brain, thus decreasing hydrocephalus

★ “The shunt system consists of a reservoir with a valve placed beneath the soft tissues of the head, a proximal (afferent) tubing line leading from one of the ventricles to the reservoir, and a distal (efferent) tubing line leading from the reservoir to the peritoneal cavity” (Macdonald & Burrell, 2009)

All about shunts

Page 4: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

Indications★ Suspect of a malfunctioning CSF

shunt○ hydrocephalus-related symptoms

■ increase in intracranial pressure ■ mental instability ■ urinary incontinence■ gait instability■ headaches■ coma■ and many others

Page 5: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ If patient has a possibility of current infection or general illness, VP shunt study should be delayed until patient is well again due to the risk of meningitis and other infection

★ Patient should not be pregnant or breastfeeding○ Female patients of childbearing age must be able

to prove they are not pregnant (by institutional policy)

○ If breast feeding, patient must make special preparations ahead of time

★ Any recent nuclear medicine studies using Tc-99m or In-111 may interfere with this study

Contraindications

Page 6: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ Area of the injection site (over the shunt reservoir) must be shaved and cleansed

★ “A focused history containing the following elements should be obtained:○ History of neurologic procedures, including

shunt○ History of hydrocephalus or seizures○ symptoms of head pressure or pain○ Problems with balance or memory○ Results of other diagnostic tests” (Farrell, et

al.)★ No diet or medication restrictions

Patient Preparation

Page 7: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ Tc-99m DTPA (preferred), In-111 DTPA, or, rarely,Tc-99m pertechnetate may be used for imaging of shunts○ Tc-99m DTPA

■ 0.5mCi (0.5-1.0mCi) ● technically Tc-99m DTPA is not approved for

intrathecal injections and “should be used with caution” (Farrell, et al.)

○ In-111 DTPA■ 75-300 uCi (depending on the the site of the

shunt)

Radiopharmaceutical Information

Page 8: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ Dose administered by a physician★ Patient is sitting upright★ Injected intrathecally into shunt

○ through rubber reservoir of shunt■ usually located: on the right side of the head;

behind the ear, on top of the head, or the posterior portion of the head; and usually a few centimeters below where the initial incision site during surgery was.

○ a small amount, bolus, is all that may be injected as “to ensure minimal disruption of the normal CSF flow” (Macdonald & Burrell, 2009).■ 0.3-0.5ml

○ CSF should NOT be removed by a syringe during this procedure

Radiopharmaceutical Administration

Page 9: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ Patient Supine after injection★ Immediate pictures

○ Anterior and Laterals○ centered over head○ 1 minute picture○ special attention to number of counts in that 1 minute

★ Marker Picture○ Lateral

■ slowly trace a radiopharmaceutical marker around the scalp■ also place marker on each canthus (outside corner of the eyes) for a few

seconds○ Repeat for Anterior

★ Anterior pictures every 2 minutes for 10 minutes★ Anterior Images every 5 minutes for at least 20 minutes

○ alternating between imaging the abdomen (where the shunt empties) and the head

★ “If activity is not passing down the tube [or] is not clearing, the patient should be placed in an upright position and/or the shunt should be pumped” and the series of images would be repeated

per University Hospital protocol

Imaging Protocol (In-111 DTPA)

Page 10: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ Photopeaks at 173 and 247 keV★ 15% window★ Medium Energy High Resolution Collimators★ 128 x 128 Matrix

per University Hospital

Acquisition Parameters(In-111 DTPA)

Page 11: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ 30 minute dynamic study○ 60 images 30 seconds each or 1

minute/frame for 20 minutes○ Anterior images

★ Planar 10 minutes/view

Imaging Protocol (Tc-99m DTPA)

Page 12: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ LFOV camera★ Low Energy High Resolution

collimators★ photopeak at 140 keV

○ 20% window★ 128 x 128 matrix

Acquisition Parameters (Tc-99m DTPA)

Page 13: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ activity in shunt reservoir

★ activity along entire course of shunt tubing into the peritoneal cavity

★ In Tc-99m DTPA, kidney visualization is normal for shunt patency

Normal vs. Abnormal Study★ reflux into

ventricles of the brain

★ early termination of shunt tubing activity

★ any signs of obstruction

Page 14: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

NormalImages

Abnormal

Page 15: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

★ “Sum the dynamic images and display for optimal visualization of the area of interest” (Farrell, et. al)

★ Processing these images involves labeling the markers (scalp, canthus, etc.)

★ Images should be inverted so that hot areas are dark and background is lighter

★ Label the area imaged on display page○ examples: Anterior head, anterior abdomen,

Lateral chest, etc.★ Label the times of the images

Processing

Page 16: Competency Case Study Week 10 (2)

Campellone, J. (2013, October 29). Ventriculoperitoneal shunting (D. Zieve, Ed.). Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/003019.htm

CSF Shunt Scintigraphy. (2014, October 1). Retrieved July 8, 2015, from http://www.sh.lsuhsc.edu/raddept/pdf/sec18/Rad Proc 18.8.7.6.pdf

Farrell, M., Mantel, E., Basso, D., Thomas, K., & Kerr, B. (n.d.). Quick-reference protocol manual for nuclear medicine technologists.

Hydrocephalus and Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) Shunt [Medical Illustration]. Retrieved from http://findlaw.doereport.com/generateexhibit.php?ID=9550&ExhibitKeywordsRaw=&TL=&A=42409

Macdonald, A., & Burrell, S. (2009). Infrequently Performed Studies in Nuclear Medicine: Part 2. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 1-3. Retrieved July 8, 2015, from http://interactive.snm.org/docs/Infrequently%20Performed%20Studies%20Part%202.pdf

Nuclear Medicine Shunt Patency. (n.d.). Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/neurology_neurosurgery/centers_clinics/hydrocephalus/procedures/nuclear_medicine_shunt.html

University Hospital

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Tap. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/81058-overview#a6

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. (n.d.). Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.fpnotebook.com/Neuro/Surgery/VntrclprtnlShnt.htm

References