Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene,...
-
Upload
lucas-ramsey -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene,...
![Page 1: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or
Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings
by Ingrid Milošev, Simon Kovač, Rihard Trebše, Vesna Levašič, and Venčeslav Pišot
J Bone Joint Surg AmVolume 94(19):1756-1763
October 3, 2012
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
![Page 2: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Bar graph showing the percentage of major diagnoses at the time of the index operation for patients who received the various types of bearings.
Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
![Page 3: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Photograph showing the BICON-PLUS cementless acetabular cup (center) and the three different bearing couples: the polyethylene bearing (at right), the ceramic bearing (left, rear), and the
metal bearing (left, front) (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland...
Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
![Page 4: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Photograph showing the SL-PLUS cementless femoral stem (Plus Orthopedics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland, now Smith & Nephew).
Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
![Page 5: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Comparison of mean age and mean postoperative activity for patients with three different bearing couples.
Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
![Page 6: Comparison of Ten-Year Survivorship of Hip Prostheses with Use of Conventional Polyethylene, Metal-on-Metal, or Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings by Ingrid Miloev,](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082419/5a4d1b887f8b9ab0599bdb62/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Survivals for the BICON-PLUS cups with different bearing couples: metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM), and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), with revision for any reason (Fig. 4-a) and
revision due to aseptic loosening (Fig. 4-b) as the end points.
Ingrid Milošev et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1756-1763
©2012 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.