Comparison of Present Day Peakshaving Liquefaction Technologies
Comparison Of Technologies Applications Environment
3
Comparison of Technologies- Applications Environment Technology Maturit y Critica l attribu tes Manufactur ing technology Suitable Geography Usage PV/Mono Crystalline Silicon Full Install ation, Adhesiv e, degrade s* , land^ Fully mature 50 degrees North and South of equator Rooftops (c & r) 1 , Solar farms; Urban and Rural PV/Multi Crystalline Silicon Almost full Install ation, Adhesiv e, degrade s* Mature, needs improvemen t 50 Degrees North & South of equator Rooftops (c & r) 1 , Solar farms; Urban and Rural PV TF/CdTe Product ion Cadmium toxicit y, low Developed Around the world. Rooftops (c & r) 1 , façade,
-
Upload
pranay-kumar -
Category
Business
-
view
1.056 -
download
1
description
Comparison of solar energy techongies-Applications Enviornment
Transcript of Comparison Of Technologies Applications Environment
Comparison of Technologies-Applications Environment
Technology MaturityCritical attributes
Manufacturing technology
Suitable Geography
Usage
PV/Mono Crystalline Silicon
Full Installation, Adhesive, degrades* , land^
Fully mature 50 degrees North and South of equator
Rooftops (c & r)1 , Solar farms; Urban and Rural
PV/Multi Crystalline Silicon
Almost full Installation, Adhesive, degrades*
Mature, needs improvement
50 Degrees North & South of equator
Rooftops (c & r)1 , Solar farms; Urban and Rural
PV TF/CdTe Production Cadmium toxicity, low efficiency, flexible material
Developed Around the world. Except for higher latitudes
Rooftops (c & r)1 , façade, Solar farms; Urban and Rural
PV TF/CIGS First consumer
Low efficiency, Flexible material
Developed needs improvement
Around the world , except for higher latitudes
Rooftops (c & r)1 , façade, Solar farms; Urban and Rural
Comparison of Technologies-Applications Environment
PV TF/amorphous Silicon
First Consumer Low cost substrate, low efficiency
Needs improvement
Around the world, except for higher latitudes
Rooftops (c & r)1 , façade, Solar farms; Urban and Rural
PV Organic TF Lab Inexpensive, lightweight, degrades*
Lab Not knownRooftops (c & r)1 , portable devices, vehicles, facade; Urban and Rural
PV Nanosolar Film
LabFlexibility, light weight, low cost Lab Not known
Rooftops (c & r)1 , portable devices, garments, facade; Urban and Rural
CPV Advanced learning
Tracking, high efficiency, low cost
DevelopedHigh sunlight intensity area , between 40 degrees north and south of equator
Solar farms; Urban and Rural
Comparison of Technologies-Applications Environment
XCPV Lab High efficiency, low cost, unproven#
DemonstrationHigh Intensity between 40 degrees south and North of equator
Solar farms; Rural
Micro CSP First consumerHigh efficiency, usable for low power need, unproven#
DemonstrationHigh Intensity between 40 degrees south and North of equator
Rooftops (c & r)1 , Solar farms; Urban and Rural
CSP Full
High efficiency, low cost/unit power, tarcking, load centre far away, land^
Mature High Intensity between 40 degrees south and North of equator
Solar farms; Rural, empty land
Notes: *-- degrades under high intensity and prolonged exposure to sunlight#--- Unproven on the field for sufficient time^ ---- Land requirement huge to generate economical power1---- c & r commercial and residential rooftops
