Comparison of philosophers
-
Upload
christine-bombane -
Category
Documents
-
view
511 -
download
0
Transcript of Comparison of philosophers
FRIEDRICH HEGELKARL M
ARX
Comparison and Contrast of
Philosophies
By: CHRISTINE R. BOMBANE III- H BSE SOC.STUD University of Makati
FRIEDRICH HEGELKARL M
ARX
PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE
FRIEDRICH HEGEL
KARL MARX
1. DIALECTIC PROCESS
• thesis, antithesis, synthesis
2. World spirit drives the history.
3.History is the story of world spirit to consciousness itself
1. DIALECTIC MATERIALISM
• Basis and superstructure of society.
2. It was the economic forces that drives history
3. History is the story of class struggles
1. INTERACTION (DIALECTIC)
2.HISTORY IS MOVING FORWARD
3. HISTORY IS PURPOSEFUL
FRIEDRICH HEGELKARL M
ARXDIALECTIC PROCESS
Anyone studying history in depth will observe that thought is usually proposed- THESISBut as soon as one thought is propose it will be contrasted- ANTITHESIS (NEGATION)Tension is resolved by the other proposal of a third thought which accommodates the best of both point of view- SYNTHESIS
DIALECTIC MATERIALISMThere would be
interaction between the basis and superstructure of society.BASIS- are the materials, economic (production) and social relationSUPERSTRUCTURE- what kind of politics institution there, which laws it have, and at least, what are their religion ,morals ,arts, philosophy
1. INTERACTION (DIALECTIC)there must be interaction in a
society or in arguments.
FRIEDRICH HEGELKARL M
ARX“World spirit” or world reason is the force that droves history forward
Material changes are the ones that affect history. Spiritual relation do not create material thing. It was the economic forces in society that created changes and thus drove history forward.
2. History is moving forward
FRIEDRICH HEGELKARL M
ARXHistory is the story of the world spirit gradually coming to consciousness of itself
The study of history shows that humanity is moving toward greater rationality and freedom.
History of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.
History is principally a matter of who is to own the mean of production.
3. History is purposeful