Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping
description
Transcript of Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping
![Page 1: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping
• Sahana Raghunandan, John Paden, Shannon Blunt, Carl Leuschen
• Ken Jezek, Xiaoqing Wu, John Paden, Carl Leuschen
![Page 2: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Current Platforms
GPR
DC-8
Twin Otter
P-3
![Page 3: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Methods• Interferometric SAR (INSAR)
– Beam forming followed by absolute phase estimation where phase is related to the angle of arrival
• SAR Tomography• MUSIC• MLE• RISR
![Page 4: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Tomographic Concept
![Page 5: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MLE 1
![Page 6: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MLE 2
![Page 7: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
MUSIC
![Page 8: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
RISR
![Page 9: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Simulation
![Page 10: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MLE/MUSIC Comparison
558 559 560 561 562 563 564
7462
7462.5
7463
7463.5
7464
350
400
450
500
558 559 560 561 562 563 564
7462
7462.5
7463
7463.5
7464
350
400
450
500
![Page 11: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MLE/MUSIC Comparison
562 562.5 563 563.5 564
7459
7460
7461
7462
7463
7464
7465 200
250
300
350
400
450
500
562 562.5 563 563.5 564
7459
7460
7461
7462
7463
7464
7465 200
250
300
350
400
450
500
![Page 12: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Cross Over Analysis
562 562.5 563 563.5
7462
7462.2
7462.4
7462.6
7462.8
7463
7463.2
7463.4
7463.6
7463.8
7464
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
562 562.5 563 563.5
7462
7462.2
7462.4
7462.6
7462.8
7463
7463.2
7463.4
7463.6
7463.8
7464
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
![Page 13: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Basal Topography – Tomography and Interpolated Nadir Data
Basal Topography estimate of Isunguata Sermia Glacier computed by subtracting tomographic ice thickness from ATM surface elevation model (upper). Basal topography estimated by interpolating nadir ice thickness data and subtracting from surface elevation model (lower).
![Page 14: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Data Comparisons
Basal topography constructed from tomography (red), nadir data (blue) and interpolated nadir-data (black) along the northerly (upper left), central (upper right) and southernly (lower left) profile lines. ATM derived surface elevation along the deglaciated terrain forward of the glacier (lower right) illustrates the similarity of the glaciated and deglaciated basal topography.
![Page 15: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Proglacial and Subglacial Terrain
Hill-shaded model of the tomography-derived basal topography (dark blue) overlaid on a hill-shaded model of the interpolated nadir-data topography (gray). These are overlaid on a hill-shaded model of the ice-sheet, exposed-rock surface (light blue). The vertical exaggeration of each model is 10x. Similarity between proglacial and subglacial terrain suggests that erorsion processes largely unchanged as glacier has retreated.
![Page 16: Comparison of Methods for Ice Bottom Mapping](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081512/56815ffa550346895dcef9e0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)