Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009...

32
Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9- 12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student Success Consultants PVNC CDSB

Transcript of Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009...

Page 1: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Comparison Course ChartsTechnological Education 9-12

1999 & 2000vs

implementation September 2009______________________

R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student Success Consultants

PVNC CDSB

Page 2: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Course Code Format

i.e. TCJ3E – Construction Technology

T - discipline (T=Technology)

C - subject (e.g. M=manufacturing)

J - Broad-Based Technology course

or EMPHASIS course will change this letter (i.e. Dental)

3 - grade

E - destination

Page 3: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Grade 9• Integrated Technologies (TTI) changed to Exploring Technologies

(TIJ)• Can be offered as broad-based tech (BBT) in each subject area

– Course codes provided

Recommendation from DRAFT curriculum document: the Grade 9 course may be adapted to focus on any one of the technological education subject areas (codes listed with charts). Students should successfully complete Exploring Technologies (TIJ1O) before attempting a Grade 9 course that is focused on a particular subject area.

• No EMPHASIS or multiple-credit option• ½ credit option available

Page 4: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

• Grade 10• 10 BBT areas available• No Emphasis courses possible• Multiple credit courses available

• Grade 11 and 12• 10 BBT areas available• Emphasis courses possible• Multiple credit courses available

Page 5: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

EMPHASIS coursesEMPHASIS courses allow specialization in a specific sector – are identified by 3rd character in course code – has its own course descriptor to add to the BBT course descriptionFYI as of this date (Nov 17) no emphasis course codes nor descriptors supplied

NOTE: Any Gr 11 BBT or Emphasis course within a subject area serves as a prerequisite for any Gr 12 BBT or Emphasis course within that same subject area

Page 6: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

BBT EMPHASIS Courses

Some examples:• Auto Body• Dental• Masonry• Horticulture• Hairstyling

• Computer Aided Manufacturing• Food and Nutrition• Computer Network Support• Interior Design• Photography & Digital Imaging

Page 7: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Multi-Credit Courses

• Maximum of 3 credits in a multi-credit course (330 hours) which can be done in increments of 55 hours

• Appropriate for focused programs:– OYAP, SHSM, Dual Credit

• Must pre-declare the # of credits at start of course– 1st credit must follow BBT philosophy (activity-based &

project-driven)– 2nd and 3rd credits are for the practice and refinement of

skills and knowledge which reflect current industry practices and standards

Page 8: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Integrated Technologies 2000

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

*shading of a box = no prerequisites

Page 9: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Exploring Technologies 2009

Exploring Technologies

TIJ1O

Potential timetabling options from the curriculum document:- schools that offer courses in numerous tech areas in Gr10-12 may choose to offer more than one Exploring Technologies course, each of which covers a particular selection of subject areas. For example, “Exploring Technologies 1 (TIJ101) might cover construction tech, technological design, and green industries; TIJ1O2 might address computer tech, manufacturing tech, and transportation tech, and TIJ1O3 has communications tech, hairstyling and aesthetics, health care, and hospitality and tourism. Students select the course that best suits their interests. They may earn credit for only one such course- schools may find a “shops rounds” approach to the delivery of Exploring Technologies effective. In this approach, students focus on particular subject areas for a few weeks at a time throughout a semester (e.g., on health care for three weeks, green industries for three weeks, and so on).

Page 10: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Communications Technology 2000

Communications Technology

TGJ2O

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Communications Technology

TGJ3M

Communication Technology

TGJ4M

Communication Technology

TGJ4E

Communications Technology

TGJ3E

Page 11: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Communications Technology 2009

Communications Technology

TGJ2O

Exploring Communications Technology

TGJ1O

Communications Technology

TGJ3M

Communications Technology

TGJ4M

Communications Technology: Digital Imagery and Web Design

TGJ4O

Communications Technology: Broadcast and Print Production

TGJ3O

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 12: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Construction Technology 2000

Construction Technology

TCJ2O

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Construction Technology

TCJ3C

Construction Technology

TCJ4C

Construction Technology

TCJ4E

Construction Technology

TCJ3E

Page 13: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Construction Technology 2009

Construction Technology

TCJ2O

Exploring Construction Technology

TCJ1O

Construction Engineering Technology

TCJ3C

Construction Engineering Technology

TCJ4C

Construction Technology

TCJ4E

Construction Technology

TCJ3E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 14: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Construction Technology 2009

Custom Woodworking

TWJ4E

Custom Woodworking

TWJ3E

Page 15: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Health and Personal Services 2000

Health and Personal Services Technology

TPJ2O

Health Care

TPA3C

Medical Technologies

TPT4C

Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TPE4E

Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TPE3EChild Development

and Gerontology

TPO4C

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 16: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Hairstyling and Aesthetics 2009

Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TXJ2O

Exploring Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TXJ1O

Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TXJ4E

Hairstyling and Aesthetics

TXJ3E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 17: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Health Care 2009

Health Care

TPJ2O

Exploring Health Care

TPJ1O

Health Care

TPJ3C

Health Care

TPJ4C

Health Care

TPJ4M

Health Care

TPJ3M

Child Development

and Gerontology

TOJ4C

Health Care: Support Services

TPJ4E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 18: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Hospitality and Tourism 2000

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ2O

Hospitality

TFT3C

Tourism

TFS4C

Hospitality and Tourism

TFH4E

Hospitality and Tourism

TFH3E

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 19: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Hospitality and Tourism 2009

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ2O

Exploring Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ1O

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ3C

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ4C

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ4E

Hospitality and Tourism

TFJ3E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 20: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Manufacturing Technology 2000

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ2O

Manufacturing Engineering Technology

TMJ3C

Manufacturing Engineering Technology

TMJ4C

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ4E

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ3E

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 21: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Manufacturing Technology 2009

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ2O

Exploring Manufacturing Technology

TMJ1O

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ3C

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ4C

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ4E

Manufacturing Technology

TMJ3E

Manufacturing Engineering Technology

TMJ3M

Manufacturing Engineering Technology

TMJ4M

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 22: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Technological Design 2000

Technological Design

TDJ20

Technological Design

TDJ3M

Technological Design

TDJ4M

Technological Design

TDJ4E

Technological Design

TDJ3E

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 23: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Technological Design 2009

Technological Design

TDJ20

Exploring Technological Design

TDJ1O

Technological Design

TDJ3M

Technological Design

TDJ4M

Technological Design in the Twenty-first Century

TDJ4O

Technological Design and the Environment

TDJ3O

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 24: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Transportation Technology 2000

Transportation Technology

TTJ2O

Transportation Technology

TTJ3C

Transportation Technology

TTJ4C

Transportation Technology

TTJ4E

Transportation Technology

TTJ3E

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 25: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Transportation Technology 2009

Transportation Technology

TTJ2O

Exploring Transportation Technology

TTJ1O

Transportation Technology

TTJ3C

Transportation Technology

TTJ4C

Transportation Technology: Vehicle Maintenance

TTJ4E

Transportation Technology: Vehicle Ownership

TTJ3O

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 26: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Computer and Information Science 2000

Computer and Information Science

TIK2O

Computer and Information Science ICS3M

Computer and Information Science ICS4M

Computer Engineering

ICE4M

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 27: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Computer Studies 2009 separate document

Introduction to Computer Studies ICS2O

Introduction to Computer Science ICS3U

Computer Science

ICS4U

Computer Programming

ICS4C

Introduction to Computer Programming

ICS3C

Page 28: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Computer Engineering 2000

Computer Engineering

TEE2O

Computer Engineering

ICE3M

Computer Engineering

ICE4M

Computer Engineering

ICE4E

Computer Engineering

ICE3E

Integrated Technologies

TTI1O

Page 29: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Computer Technology 2009

Computer Technology

TEJ2O

Exploring Computer Technology

TEJ1O

Computer Engineering Technology

TEJ3M

Computer Engineering Technology

TEJ4M

Computer Technology

TEJ4E

Computer Technology

TEJ3E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 30: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Green Industries 2009

Green Industries

THJ2O

Exploring Green Industries

THJ1O

Green Industries

THJ3M

Green IndustriesTHJ4M

Green Industries

THJ4E

Green Industries

THJ3E

Exploring Technologies TIJ1O

Page 31: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Important Messages for Curriculum Chairs, Guidance and Admin

CONCERNS:– Can’t do any new courses until Sept 2009 – then full

implementation– Prerequisites are waived for next year– All SHSM course pathway approval must be changed for next

year using new course codes

CALENDAR:– ALL course descriptions have changed (i.e. even the T*J2O

courses)– OSSD compulsory THIRD grouping is changing “to meet the

Group 3 additional compulsory credit requirement, students have the choice of earning one credit for a course in technological education or computer studies or one credit for an additional course in science (Grade 11 or 12).“

Page 32: Comparison Course Charts Technological Education 9-12 1999 & 2000 vs implementation September 2009 ______________________ R Hartwick, JA Egan, Student.

Further questions contact:

Peter Beens

Ministry of Education

416-325-2085

[email protected]