Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

18
Structural analysis of an office building Enache Ovidiu Stefan

Transcript of Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Page 1: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Structural analysis of an office building

Enache Ovidiu Stefan

Page 2: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

SAP2000 model ETABS model

STRUCTURAL MODEL

Page 3: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Building data

- circular columns 60 cm

- ramp 15 cm

- girders 55x25 cm

- slab 15 cm

- shear walls 20 cm, 25 cm

- curtain wall 8 mm

Page 4: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Loads

Loads combination acc. to CR0-2005

1.35 1.5 1.05

0.4E

G Q Q

G A Q

- dead load – self weight- live load - 4000 N/m2- wind load- snow load - 2000 N/m2- seismic load - time history - Santa Monica earthquake

Page 5: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Modal analysis

Page 6: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Modal analysis

Page 7: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Modal analysis

Page 8: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

ETABS results

SAP2000 results

Page 9: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Seismic analysisSanta Monica earthquake

direction x direction y

relative level displacements

Page 10: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000
Page 11: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Girder analysis

Page 12: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Walls analysis

Page 13: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Stairs ramp analysis

Page 14: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000
Page 15: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000

Slab analysis

Page 16: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000
Page 17: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000
Page 18: Comparison between Etabs and Sap2000