Comparative Pollen Viability and Pollen Tube Growth of Two ...
Transcript of Comparative Pollen Viability and Pollen Tube Growth of Two ...
PRIMARY RESEARCH PAPER| Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017
Comparative Pollen Viability and Pollen Tube Growth of Two
Endemic Philippine Etlingera (Zingiberaceae, Alpinioideae)
ABSTRACT
The pollen viability and pollen tube growth of Etlingera dalican and Etlingera philippinensis (Zingiberaceae) were examined from fresh samples under the light microscope (LM) and
scanning electron microscope (SEM). Pollen measurements were 68-75µm for E. dalican
and 60-65µm for E. philippinensis, having a spheroidal shape for hydrated pollen and an
irregular shape for dry pollen for both species. E. dalican pollen has greenish-yellow color
while that of E. philippinensis is greenish. Both species have inaperturate pollen but differ
in their ornamentation, which is gemmate in E. dalican and psilate in E. philippinensis. E. dalican had 88.56% pollen viability while E. philippinensis had only 40.69%. The rate of
pollen tube growth was faster in E. dalican (17.75 µm per day) than E. philippinensis (8.17
µm per day). The possible pollinators observed for the two species were butterflies of the
genus Catopsilia, ants and flies. Additional information on the inflorescence and flower
description of the two species are herein presented.
KEY WORDS :
Etlingera dalican
Etlingera philippinensis Philippine Native Gingers
Pollen germination
Pollen morphology
1Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Central
Mindanao University (CMU), University Town, Musuan, Bukidnon 2Center for Biodiversity Research and Extension in Mindanao
(CEBREM), Central Mindanao University (CMU), University Town,
Musuan, Bukidnon *Corresponding Author: [email protected] Date Submitted : 01 December 2016 Date Accepted : 18 May 2017
INTRODUCTION
Zingiberaceae, also called “gingers”, are herbaceous plants
that produce essential oils (Larsen et al., 1999; Larsen &
Larsen, 2006). These plants are widely used in traditional
medicine to relieve colds, inflammations, diarrhea, stomach
disorders, fever and cramps. They are also valuable as food
flavoring and spice agents, and are generously included in
postpartum diets (Larsen et al., 1999; Leong-Skornickova &
Gallick, 2010; Boonmee et al., 2011). According to Pelser et
al. (2011), the Philippine Zingiberaceae includes 14 genera
with 107 species.
Etlingera, a large genus of about 100 species which is
distributed in the Indo-Pacific region has 9 species in the
Philippines (Poulsen, 2006; Pelser et al., 2011) of which two
species are considered in this study. Etlingera dalican (Elmer)
A.D. Poulsen is a Philippine endemic species which was
renamed in 2003 of its former name Amomum dalican (Elmer)
Merr. and known for its local names “dalikan” in Bukidnon and
“tagbak” in the Visayas (Acma, 2010; Pelser et al., 2011). The
seeds of its ripe fruits are considered edible and some parts
of the plant are boiled to cure fever as reported by the local
people (Acma, 2010). Etlingera philippinensis (Ridl.) R.M.
Sm. is another Philippine endemic species also locally
known as “tagbak” in the Visayas which holds a new record
of reported occurrence in the eastern Mindanao corridor
(Acma, 2010).
Reconnaissance observations of these two species by the
authors indicate the rarity of fruits in E. philippinensis compared to E. dalican populations. Although many
physical, nutritional and biological factors in general could
influence fruit setting in plants, the aspect on pollen
viability, pollen tube growth and pollen morphology are
given specific attention because of their taxonomic and
phylogenetic values. Hence, this study presents empirical
information on pollen characteristics of two Etlingera species that could be scrutinized in future evaluation and
taxonomic characterization of these species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection of Samples. Fresh pollen samples were collected
from matured stamens of 10 plants in the same population
during anthesis (flowers fully open) between the months of
November 2015 and January 2016 from 5:00 AM to 6:00
AM. Pollen collection was in accordance with the natural
flower opening time for each species. Herbarium
specimens and spirit collections were deposited at the
Botany Section of Central Mindanao University Herbarium
(CMUH) with the accession number 00010859 for E.
dalican and 00010860 for E. philippinensis. All pollen
Noe P. Mendez1*, Heidi C. Porquis1,2, Evangeline B. Sinamban1, and Florfe M. Acma1,2
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 2
samples used in the study were freshly collected from plants
growing in the living ginger collections at the Mt. Musuan
Zoological and Botanical Garden (MMZBG) of Central
Mindanao University (CMU) and Acma’s residence at the
Market Site of CMU, University Town, Musuan, Bukidnon.
The flower samples were placed separately in zip–lock
cellophane bags to prevent drying and were transported to
the laboratory for further processing within 15-20 min from
collection and were maintained at room temperature of 20°C.
Five plants per species were morphologically measured and
described. Lengths of the live specimens were measured
using a meter stick. Three (3) inflorescences per species
were also collected and brought to the laboratory for
dissection and measurement of parts.
Pollen Morphology and Micromorphological Studies. Fresh
pollen samples for light microscopy examination were
removed from the anther sacs using forceps, mounted with
water in a glass slide, examined under microscope and
described as to: a. size b. shape c. color d. aperture and e.
ornamentation. Measurable features like the size of the pollen
were determined from scanning electron microscope (SEM)
photographs. Pollen color was visually classified based on
hydrated pollen which were examined under light microscope
(LM). Samples were not acetolyzed based on the reports of
Liang (1988) and Saensouk et al. (2009) that members of the
Zingiberaceae are mostly not resistant to acetolysis due to
their very thin exine and thick intine wall. For the other pollen
morphological features such as shape, aperture and
ornamentation, they were classified following the criteria of
Liang (1988), Liang (1990), Theilade et al. (1993), Saensouk
et al. (2009), and Chen & Xia (2011).
The pollen samples for SEM examination were sent to
Mindanao State University–Iligan Institute of Technology
(MSU-IIT), Iligan City. The possibility of dehydration of the
pollen samples was considered due to the 5-6 hrs travel
between CMU and MSU-IIT. The pollen samples were
mounted on the sample holder using carbon tape. Then the
mounted pollen were coated with platinum using the JEOL
JFC-1600 Autofine Coater to make the surface of samples
suitable for SEM characterization. The SEM images of the
samples were taken using the JEOL JSM-6510LA Analytical
SEM coupled with an energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer at
200x, 500x and 1000x magnifications.
Testing for Starch and Pollen Viability. A common method to
assess pollen viability is by staining and direct counting
(Barrett, 1985; Dudash, 1991; Willis, 1999). Parfitt and
Ganeshan (1989) have determined that the pollen stain tests
(acetocarmine, Alexander Stain’s, TTC, MTT, and NBT) are
not reliable or consistent and are not positively correlated with
in vitro germination tests (as cited by Bolat and Pirlak, 1999).
Hence, this study used IKI (iodine + potassium iodide)
solution for the stain test. Fresh pollen were mounted on
glass slides and tested with a drop of IKI solution to reveal
the presence of starch. Another set of pollen samples for the
determination of the pollen viability was prepared separately
with pollen added with a drop of IKI solution. These were
covered with a cover slip and subjected to light microscopy
using low power objective (100x) and counted for the
percentage viability. In getting the percentage viability, a
modified formula was used as shown below:
(Viable pollen /Total # of pollen) x 100 = Percentage Viability
Determination of Pollen Germination
Pollen germination assays. Pollen samples from
another set of 5 plants for each species from the same
population were collected for germination test. These
samples were processed right after the collection. Pollen
collection time was limited to 15-20 min to avoid exposure to
contaminants. The germination medium consists of 100 g
sucrose (C12H22O11), 500 mg calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)
2_4H2O], 120 mg magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), 100 mg
potassium nitrate (KNO3) and 120 mg boric acid (H3BO3)
were dissolved in 1000 ml deionized water following Karni &
Aloni (2002). The pH of the germinating medium was 6.37 at
55°C. An estimated 10 ml of the medium was poured/
dispensed into three Petri plates for each species in the
treatment and allowed to cool for about 15 min to allow the
agar to solidify. The plates were covered and incubated and
maintained at a room temperature of 20°C. No staining of the
pollen was needed (Ozler et al., 2009) and each plate was
considered a replicate. The petri plates with the germinating
medium were exposed under the ultraviolet light for 15 min.
The pollen samples were inoculated aseptically to the petri
plates containing the germinating medium. Lids of petri
plates with pollen samples were sealed with a tape, labeled
accordingly and brought to the growth room with the same
maintained temperature.
A. Evaluation of the onset of pollen germination. After
24–h of incubation, the pollen were counted for pollen
germination. Pollen samples inoculated on the Petri
plates were mounted on glass slide and viewed under
the light microscope. Those found within the
microscopic field (100x magnifications) were considered
for scoring. A pollen was classified as germinated if at
least the beginning of a developing pollen tube could be
seen emerging from one of the pores or reach the
pollen diameter (Steiner & Gregorius, 1998; Tosun &
Koyuncu, 2007). Percentage pollen germination was
calculated following the formula of ISTA (1999) as
shown below:
(Pollen germinated / Total # of pollen) x 100 = %Germination
B. Pollen tube lengths. Pollen were considered
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 3
germinated when its tube length equaled the grain
diameter (Luza et al., 1987). The pollen tube lengths
were measured within 14 days at 2 days interval after
initial plating. Observations were done with an ocular
micrometer fitted to the ocular/eyepiece of the
microscope. The determination of the percentage pollen
tube lengths depended upon the pollen tubes that
emerged outside the pollen wall.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Plant Description. E. dalican plants reach a height of 2.5–3 m
and the inflorescence (with 10-18 flowers) is obconic,
measuring 8 x 4 cm with a truncated top when flowers open.
Bracts are oblong, tips notched and hairy, pink towards the
top and white below. Bracteoles are tubular, tips hairy, pink
towards upper portion while white at base. Calyx elongated,
fused, tubular, three tipped and pink. Corolla lobes are
oblanceolate, yellow in color, and corolla tube white in color;
stigma reddish color. Anther position is lower than stigma and
the pollen are located between corolla and anther sacs (Fig.
1). Populations of E. dalican are seen near streams and/or
forest habitat where there is no direct sunlight. The flowers of
the plant do not open at the same time.
E. philippinensis on the other hand, reaches a height of 2–2.5
m and the inflorescence (with 5-8 flowers) is cone-shaped, 9 x
2 cm. Bracts are elliptic-lanceolate, reddish but white at base;
bracteoles tubular. Calyx elongated, fused, tubular, three
tipped, red in color except the basal part which is white. The
corolla is oblong, red but base is white. Labellum is very
bright red or scarlet with ovate shape. All parts are lighter in
color at the bottom and darker towards the tip. Pollen samples
are also located in the anther sacs (Fig. 2). Rhizomes are
long; creeping along the soil, inflorescences either grow
distantly from the main rhizome or are partially buried in the
soil. This species is also found in shady places.
E. philippinensis have dominantly reddish color in its entire
inflorescences. Like in E. dalican, individual flowers of E.
philippinensis do not open at the same time.
In the report of Melati (2015) on Zingiber officinale Rosc.
temperature and relative humidity could influence the time of
anthesis and increase in temperature and relative humidity
accelerates the opening of flowers. However, as to whether
the same factors are behind the anthesis in these two
Etlingera species needs further investigation. Likewise,
Darjanto & Satifah (1990) also stated that changes in these
factors change plants’ response to flowering.
Throughout the study, it was observed that the two Etlingera
species were often frequented by two species of butterflies
belonging to genus Catopsilia. This observations support the
earlier report of Larsen et al. (1999) and Larsen & Larsen
(2006) that Etlingera species are pollinated by butterflies. E.
dalican was further observed hosting black-colored ants in its
inflorescences (Fig. 3). E. philippinensis, on the other hand,
harbored fruit flies and red-colored ants. These insects were
distributed on the entire plant particularly on the leaves and
inflorescences (Fig. 4). The probability that they could be
possible pollinators is considered. Pollinators (butterflies
and ants) are known to frequently visit plant species due to
nectar secretion. The amount of reward offered to a flower
visitor also depends on the concentration of sugar in the
nectar. However, humidity, temperature and soil moisture
strongly influence high rate of nectar secretion (Brown, 1959;
Real & Rathcke, 1991; Aswani et al., 2013).
Pollen Morphology. The characters of pollen studied using
LM and SEM are summarized in Table 1. The results on the
morphological features of the pollen showed resemblances
as well as differences between the species in their features.
According to McGrath (1999), pollen of many plants can be
used to classify the genus and sometimes the species on the
basis of such characteristics like the size, shape, aperture,
Figure 1: Etlingera dalican Floral Dissection: inflorescence (inf),
sterile bract (sb), fertile bract (fb), flower (fl), bracteole (bt), calyx
(cx), corolla lobes (cl), epigynous gland (eg), style (st), stigma (s),
labellum (lm) and anther sacs (as).
Figure 2: Etlingera philippinensis Floral Dissection: inflorescence
(inf), flower (fl), fertile bract (fb), bracteole (bt), calyx (cx), corolla
lobes (cl), labellum (lm), stigma (s) and anther sacs (as).
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 4
and ornamentation.
The present study revealed that E. dalican has bigger pollen
compared to E. philippinensis in which pollen size range for E.
dalican was 68 - 75 µm while for E. philippinensis was 60 - 65
µm. E. dalican pollen appeared greenish-yellow in color
having spheroidal shape (hydrated pollen) while E.
philippinensis pollen appeared greenish in color having
spheroidal shape (hydrated pollen). These findings on the
pollen size ranges and shapes agree with the reports of
Theilade et al. (1993), Chen & Xia (2011) and Saensouk et al.
(2015). On the other hand, the outline of dry pollen in the two
species as seen in polar view are irregular specifically its
infoldings, and their pollen are inaperturate. The main
difference for the two species is in its ornamentation in which
E. dalican is gemmate while E. philippinensis is psilate (Figs.
5-8).
In this observation, it is clear that E. dalican have bigger
pollen compared to E. philippinensis. The inaperturate pollen
of the two species supports the findings of Furness & Rudall
(1999) regarding widespread occurrence of inaperturate
pollen among monocotyledonae. These data closely
resembled the inaperturate pollen in Curcuma kwangsiensis
and Boesenbergia longiflora of Chen and Xia (2011) which
range from ovoid to spherical and varied from 51.9 ± 7.2µm
in C. kwangsiensis and 109.4 ± 12.5µm in B. longiflora.
Furthermore, it was also reported that B. albomaculata and
B. longiflora pollen are spherical, 83.0 ± 7.8µm in diameter
and appeared nonaperturate. It was likewise observed that
the most inner layer was developed only in certain regions
and appeared to have excrescences similar to B. tiliiflora
(Mangaly and Nayar, 1990) with a circular area around the
distal pole where the intine is thinner.
Theilade et al. (1993) studied the Zingiber pollen and
reported that the species of said genus possess a spherical
shape (with a cerebroid or reticulate sculpturing) or
ellipsoidal pollen with a diameter ranging 55-85 µm. Pollen
were also reported that no structures indicating the presence
Figure 3 (left)
Observed insect
visitor of E.
dalican. Figure 4 (right)
Observed insect
visitors of
E. philippinensis.
Table 1. Pollen Morphology and Micromorphological Features of E. dalican and E. philippinensis under LM and SEM.
Species Pollen
size
Pollen
shape (hydrated
pollen)
Pollen
shape (dry pollen)
and infolding
Pollen color Pollen
aperture
Pollen
ornamentation
E. dalican 68–75 µm Spheroidal Irregular Greenish–yellow Inaperturate Gemmate
E. philippinensis 60–65 µm Spheroidal Irregular Greenish Inaperturate Psilate
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 5
of apertures were noted. Saensouk et al. (2015) on the other
hand reported that the majority of the genus Curcuma has
large sized pollen in the range of 50.5–86.9 µm. Chen (1989)
further reported that the exine sculpturing of the pollen of
Curcuma are psilate which is similar to E. dalican and E.
philippinensis.
It appears that the ranges of our pollen size fall between the
pollen sizes of related genera viz., Boesenbergia,
Cornukaempferia, Curcuma and Zingiber (e.g. Liang, 1988;
Liang, 1990; Mangaly and Nayar, 1990; Theilade et al.,
1993; Theilade and Theildae, 1996; Saensouk et al., 2009,
Chen and Xia, 2011; Saensouk et al., 2015). These reports
on pollen morphology are significant, since pollen function as
agents of reproduction and their features can often be used
to identify a particular taxon (Uno et al., 2001).
Pollen Viability. Previous studies on pollen samples indicate
that pollen of E. dalican turn dark brown in the iodine test,
while E. philippinensis pollen turn yellowish as indications of
the presence of starch following Simpson (2006). Firmage &
Dafni (2001) also reported that if the pollen has starch it
means that they are viable. Using the test, the current study
shows that the percentage viability of E. dalican pollen
(88.56%) is higher than that of E. philippinensis (40.69%).
There are a number of nongenetic causes of pollen inviability
including pollen age and physical factors such as
temperature and humidity (Kelly et al., 2002). Viability also
mainly depends on relative atmospheric humidity at
shedding and during pollen transport (Frankel & Galun,
1977; Pacini, 1990; Paoletti, 1992). It has been considered
that pollen remain viable longer at low relative humidity
levels (Stanley & Linskens, 1974). However, recent studies
Figure 5. Pollen of E. dalican showing spheroidal shape (hydrated
pollen) under LM (100x).
Figure 6. Pollen of E. dalican showing its sizes (68-75µm); irregular
shape (dry pollen); inaperturate and gemmate ornamentation under
SEM (1,000x).
Figure 7. Pollen of E. philippinensis showing spheroidal shape
(hydrated pollen) under LM (100x).
Figure 8. Pollen of E. philippinensis showing its sizes (60-
65µm); irregular shape (dry pollen); inaperturate and psilate
ornamentation under SEM (1,000x).
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 6
pointed out that pollen of different species need a high level of
relative humidity to germinate as well (Corbet & Plumridge,
1985; Digonnet–Kerhoas & Gay, 1990; Mulugeta et al., 1994;
Loupassaki & Vasilakakis, 1995). The link between pollen
viability and fruit and seed set has been earlier evidenced
(Stone et al., 1995). As to whether this connectivity is applied
to the two Etlingera species studied still requires further
investigation.
Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growth. Culture medium
containing a gelling agent (agar or gelatin) has been used
successfully in many species (Jayaprakash & Sarla, 2001;
Kakani et al., 2002; Kozai et al., 2008). In this study, agar was
used instead of gelatin due to the report of Stanley & Liskens
(1974) that there are several advantages of using agar
germination tests such as the ease of taking carbohydrate,
creating stable relative humidity and providing aerobic
conditions. The germination medium used for this study
followed the formulation of Karni & Aloni (2002). This is in
accordance with the suggested reports of Khan and Perveen
(2006) and Imani et al. (2011) that culture medium aside from
having carbohydrates (particularly sucrose) should also
contain germination–stimulating substances such as boric
acid, calcium nitrate, potassium nitrate and magnesium
sulfate wherein all aforesaid substances are the major
components.
E. dalican and E. philippinensis as observed in this study
have similar percentage germination of 0% after 1 day of
incubation. However, for pollen tube growth, the observation
after 2 days of incubation indicates that the first pollen tube
length in E. dalican measures 3.6–4.4 µm on the (2nd day
observation) and 72.3–79.4 µm in the 14th day observation.
On the other hand, pollen tube length in E. philippinensis on
the 2nd day measures 0.8–2.4 µm and 33.6–38.3 µm in the
14th day observation. As shown in Table 2, average increase
in pollen tube length of E. dalican is higher compared to that
of E. philippinensis.
Germination has already been used to indicate viability of
pollen (Schoenike & Stewart, 1963) and a linear relationship
is seen between pollen viability and germination capability in
many fruit species (Stanley & Linskens, 1974). Moreover,
Einhardt et al. (2006) concluded that if pollen seems non–
viable, and if vigorous pollen tubes are present, it is still good
enough to ensure at least a moderate efficient fruit set,
despite the low germination rate. Pollen germination and
tube growth thus emerge as highly dynamic and coordinated
processes, integrating many different signals from the local
environment to regulate growth and development (Rodriguez
-Enriquez et al., 2013). The present data on pollen viability
and pollen tube growth in E. dalican and E. philippinensis
collected in Central Mindanao University appear to provide
additional support to these earlier observations.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The distinguishing features of pollen in E. dalican and E.
philippinensis are presented. The pollen of E. dalican are
distinguished from that of E. philippinensis by their sizes and
exine ornamentation in which E. dalican measured 68-75 μm
and has gemmate ornamentation while E. philippinensis
measured 60-65 μm and has psilate ornamentation.
Furthermore, E. dalican pollen viability and pollen tube
growth is higher than that of E. philippinensis.
In view of our results, we recommend further studies on
pollen of other ginger species to be examined/characterized
using SEM in order to delineate species. Implications on the
different stages of germination should also be noted and
described. Moreover, these species should be germinated/
propagated using other germination media and recording the
tube growth as well. More research using molecular and
population genetic studies are needed to investigate the
relationships of the genus Etlingera. Further studies to
establish relationship between pollen viability and
germination with fruit setting in the two species must be
done.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to extend their genuine appreciation
and recognition to the following, who one way or another
have contributed to the success of the study: (1) Central
Mindanao University (CMU); (2) CMU Natural Science
Table 2. Two (2) weeks observation for Pollen Tube Growth of E. dalican and E. philippinensis under the light microscope (400x).
Species 2nd day 4th day 6th day 8th day 10th day 12th day 14th day
Average
microns (per
day)
E. dalican 3.6–4.4 µm 7.8–9.2 µm 13.6–
21.6 µm
28.6–33.3
µm
43.4–49.6
µm
63.4–
66.9 µm
72.3–
79.4 µm 17.75 µm
E. philippinensis 0.8–2.4 µm 2.4–4.4 µm 4.8–6
µm
13.6–15.3
µm
22.9–24.1
µm
28.8–
31.4 µm
33.6–
38.3 µm 8.17 µm
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 7
Research Center (NSRC)–Plant Tissue and Spore Culture
Laboratory (PTSCL) headed by Dr. Chris Rey C. Lituañas; (3)
CMU NSRC–Tuklas Lunas Development Center (TLDC)/
Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Laboratory (MBBL)
headed by Dr. Reggie Y. Dela Cruz; (4) Center for
Biodiversity Research and Extension in Mindanao (CEBREM)
headed by Dr. Victor B. Amoroso; (5) Hon. Felix G. Mendez
and Mrs. Sarah P. Mendez for the financial support; (6) Asst.
Prof. Majvell Kay G. Odarve-Vequizo of MSU-IIT for
processing the samples for SEM; (7) Ruth C. Alincastre for
helping the authors obtain the SEM results. Sincere gratitude
is also extended to the Association of Systematic Biologists of
the Philippines (ASBP) for the opportunity to publish and
considering this paper as a finalist to the Young Systematic
Biologists Forum (YSBF) during the 2016 ASBP on May 19-
20, 2016 at the University of Santo Tomas (UST), España,
Manila.
LITERATURE CITED
Acma, F.M.,2010. Biosystematics of the genus Amomum
Roxb. (Family Zingiberaceae) in the Philippines. Doctor
of Philosophy (Botany) Dissertation. University of the
Philippines, Los Baños.
Aswani, K., M. Sabu & K.P. Smisha,2013. Reproductive
Biology of Etlingera elatior (Jack.) R.M.Sm. ornamental
torch ginger. Taxonomy division, Department of Botany,
University of Calicut, Kerala - 673 635. India, 3(4): 2231–
4490.
Barrett, S.C.H.,1985. Floral trimorphism and monomorphism
in continental and island populations of Eichhornia
paniculata. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 25:
41–60.
Bolat, I. & L. Pirlak,1999. An Investigation on Pollen Viability,
Germination and Tube Growth in Some Stone Fruits.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23: 383-388.
Boonmee, A., C. Srisomsad, D. Chokchaichamnamkit, A.
Karnchanatat & P. Sangvanich,2011. A proteomic
analysis of Curcuma comosa Roxb. Rhizome BioMed
Centra: the open access publisher. Proteome Sci;
Accessed: http:www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites. Accessed on:
November 19, 2014.
Brown, H.D.,1959. Effects of respiratory inhibitors upon nectar
secretion in Antirrhinum. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical
Club, 86: 290-295.
Chen, J. & N.-H. Xia,2011. Pollen morphology of Chinese
Curcuma L. and Boesenbergia Kuntz (Zingiberaceae):
Taxonomic implications. Flora, 206: 458–467.
Chen, Z.Y.,1989. Evolutionary patterns in cytology and pollen
structure of Asian Zingiberaceae. In: Holm-Nielsen L.B.,
I.C. Nielsen & H. Balslev (eds) Tropical Forests: Botanical
Dynamics, Speciation and Diversity, Academic Press.
Pp.185–91.
Corbet, S.A. & J.R. Plumridge,1985. Hydrodynamics and the
germination of soil-seed rape pollen. Journal of
Agricultural Science, 104: 445-451.
Darjanto & S. Satifah, 1990. Basic Science of Floral Biology
and Artificial Fertilization. Gramedia Press, Jakarta. 156
pp.
Digonnet-Kerhoas, C. & C. Gay,1990. Qualite´ du pollen:
definition et estimation. Bulletin. Societe Botanique
Francaise, 137: 97-100.
Dudash, M.R.,1991. Plant size effects on female and male
function in hermaphroditic Sabatica angularis
(Gentianaceae). Ecology, 72: 1004–1012.
Einhardt, P.M., E.R. Correa & M.C.B. Raseira,2006.
Comparação entre métodos para testar a viabilidade de
pólen de pessegueiro. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura,
28: 5-7.
Firmage, D.H. & A. Dafni,2001. Field tests for pollen viability:
a comparative approach. Acta Horticulturae, 561:87–94.
Frankel, R. & E. Galun,1977. Pollination Mechanisms,
Reproduction and Plant Breeding.– Springer, New York.
Furness, C.A. & P.J. Rudall,1999. Inaperturate pollen in
monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences,
160: 395–414.
Imani, A., K. Bargezar, S. Piripireivatlou & H.S.
Masomi,2011. Storage of apple pollen and in vitro
germination. African Journal of Agricultural Research,
Victoria Island, 6: 624–629.
ISTA (International Seed Testing Association),1999.
International rules for seed testing. Seed Science and
Technology, 21: Pp. 288.
Jayaprakash, P. & N. Sarla,2001. Development of an
improved medium for germination of Cajanus cajan (L.)
Mill sp. pollen in vitro. Journal of Experimental Botany, 52:
851–855.
Kakani, V.G., P.V.V. Prasad, P.Q. Craufurd & T.R.
Wheeler,2002. Response of in vitro pollen germination
and pollen tube growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea
L.) genotypes to temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment,
25: 1651-1661.
Karni, L. & B. Aloni,2002. Fructokinase and hexokinase from
pollen grains of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.):
Possible role in pollen germination under conditions of
high temperature and CO2 enrichment. Annals of Botany,
90: 607-612.
Kelly, J.K., A. Rasch & S. Kalisz,2002. A method to estimate
pollen viability from pollen size variation. American
Journal of Botany, 89: 1021–1023.
Khan, S.A. & A. Perveen,2006. Germination capacity of
stored pollen of Abelmoschus esculentus L. (Malvaceae)
and their maintenance. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 38:
233-236.
Kozai, N., I. Kataoka, O. Chusri, Y. Yonemoto & T.
Ogata,2008. Improvement of artificial medium for passion
fruit pollen germination. Acta Horticulturae, 787: 155–158.
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 8
Larsen, K., H. Ibrahim, S.H. Khaw & L.G. Saw,1999. Gingers
of Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore. Natural History
Publications (Borneo). Kota Kinabalu. Pp. 1-30.
Larsen, K. & S.S. Larsen,2006. Gingers of Thailand. Queen
Sirikit Botanical Garden, The Botanic Garden
Organization, Ministry of Natural Resources and
Environment. Pp. 22–127.
Liang, Y.H.,1988. Pollen morphology of the family
Zingiberaceae in China-pollen types and their significance
in the taxonomy. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 26: 265–
286.
Liang, Y.H.,1990. A study on the pollen wall of the Chinese
Zingiberaceae. Acta Botanica Austro Sinica, 6: 56–65.
Lincoln, R.J., G.A. Boxshall & P.F. Clark,1982. A Dictionary of
Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. Cambridge University
Press. New York.
Loupassaki, M. & M. Vasilakakis,1995. The effect of
temperature and relative humidity on the in vitro
germination of the pollen of avocado. Proceeding of the 3rd
World Avocado Congress: Pp. 42–45. Accessed on http://
www.avocadosource.com/WAC3/WAC3_TOC.htm.
Luza, J.G., V.S. Polito & S.A. Weinbaum,1987. Staminate
bloom date and temperature responses of pollen
germination and tube growth in two walnut (Juglans regia
L.) species. American Journal of Botany, 74: 1898–1903.
McGrath, K.A.,1999. World of Biology. Gale Group. Detroit.
Mangaly, J.K. & J. Nayar,1990. Palynology of South Indian
Zingibearaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnanaean
Society, 103: 351–366.
Melati, E. R. Palupi & N. Bermawi,2015. Floral biology of
ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). International Journal of
Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology, 2(4): 1
-10.
Mulugeta, D., B.D. Maxwell, P.K. Fay & W.E. Dyer,1994.
Kochia (Kochia scoparia) pollen dispersion, viability and
germination. Weed Science, 42: 548-552.
Ozler, H., Z. Kaya & S. Pehlivan,2009. Pollen morphology of
some Centaurea L., Psephellus Cass. and Cyanus Miller
taxa. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 51/2: 53
–66.
Pacini, E.,1990. Harmomegathic characters of Pteridophyta
spores and Spermatophyta pollen. In: M. Heese and F.
Ehrendorfer (eds.) Morphology, Development and
Systematic Relevance of Pollens and Spores. Plant
Systematics and Evolution. Supplement, 5. Pp. 53–69.
Paoletti, E.,1992. Effects of acidity and detergent on in vitro
pollen germination and tube growth in forest tree species.
Tree Physiology, 10: 357–366.
Parfitt, D.E. & S. Ganeshan,1989. Comparison of procedures
for estimating viability of Prunus pollen. HortScience, 24
(2): 354-356.
Pelser, P.B., J.F. Barcelona & D.L. Nickrent (eds.), 2011. Co’s
Digital Flora of the Philippines. Accessed: http://
www.philippineplants.org. Accessed on: November 20,
2014.
Poulsen, A.D.,2006. Etlingera of Borneo. Natural History
Publications. Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. http://
www.nhpborneo.com/book. Accessed on: November 20,
2014.
Real, L. A. & B.J. Rathcke,1991. Individual variation in nectar
production and its effect on fitness in Kalmia latifolia.
Ecology, 72: 149-155.
Rodriguez-Enriquez, M.J., S. Mehdi, H.G. Dickinson & R.T.
Grant-Downton,2013. A novel method for efficient in vitro
germination and tube growth of Arabidopsis thaliana
pollen. New Phytologist, 97: 668–679.
Saensouk, P., P. ChantaranothaI & P. Theerakulpisut,2009.
Pollen morphology of the genus Cornukaempferia
(Zingiberaceae) in Thailand. Journal of Systematics and
Evolution, 47: 139–143.
Saensouk, P., P. Theerakulpisut, A. Thammathaworn, S.
Saensouk, C. Maknoi and P. Kohkaew,2015. Pollen
morphology of the genus Curcuma (Zingiberaceae) in
Northeastern Thailand. ScienceAsia, 41: 87–92.
Schoenike, R.E. & D.H. Stewart,1963. Fifth year results of
vacuum drying storage and additives on the viability of
some conifer pollen. Forest Science, 9: 96–97.
Simpson, M.,2006. Plant Systematics. Elsivier Academic
Press. New York.
Leong-Skornickova, J. & D. Gallick,2010. The Ginger
Garden. Singapore: National Parks Board Singapore
Botanic Garden. Pp. 1775.
Stanley, R.G. & H.F. Linskens,1974. Pollen Biology,
Biochemistry Management. Springer–Verlag, Berlin.
Steiner, W. & H-R. Gregorius,1998. In vitro pollen
germination experiments in Alnus and their relevance for
mating system analysis. Abteilung fiir F o r s t g e n e t i k
und Forstpflanzenzuchtung, Universitat Gottingen,
Biisgenweg 2, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany. 5(1): 47-
60.
Stone, J.L., J.D. Thomson & S.J. Dent-Acosta,1995.
Assessment of pollen viability in hand p o l l i n a t i o n
experiments: a review. American Journal of Botany,
82:1186-1197.
Theilade, I. & J. Theilade,1996. Ontogeny of pollen grains in
Zingiber spectabile (Zingiberaceae). Grana, 35: 162-
170.
Theilade, I., M.L. Maersk-Moller, J. Theilade & K.
Larsen,1993. Pollen morphology and structure of Zingiber
(Zingiberaceae). Grana, 32: 33s-342.
Tosun, F. & F. Koyuncu,2007. Investigations of suitable
pollinator for 0900 Ziraat sweet cherry c v : p o l l e n
performance tests, germination tests, germination
procedures, in vitro and in vivo pollinations pollinations.
Horticultural Science, 34 (2): 47–53.
Uno, G., K. Sporne & P. Endres,2001. Some observations
© Association of Systematic Biologists of the Philippines
Philippine Journal of Systematic Biology | Mendez et al.: Comparative Pollen Viability of Two Endemic Philippine Etlingera
Volume 11 Issue 2 - 2017 | 9
on the evolution of pollen types in dicotyledons. New
Phytologist, 71(1): 181-185.
Willis, J.H.,1999. The role of genes of large effect on
inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution, 53:
1678–1691.