Comparative Performance Measurement Highlights
-
Upload
rosalyn-riddle -
Category
Documents
-
view
20 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Comparative Performance Measurement Highlights
Comparative Performance
Measurement HighlightsBest Practices Through
Comparative Performance Measurement
February 2009
Mara CampbellOrganizational Results Director
Missouri Department of Transportation
How States Differ
• Climate• Population• Topography• Organizationa
l structure• State
economies
• Reassured DOT Executives by:• Focused on knowledge sharing• Based on rigorous measurement
methodologies• Designed to minimize additional
data collection
Construction Project Cost & Schedule Performance
• A total of 20 states participated
• Significant buy-in to the process
• 28 best practices from nine states!
Construction Project Cost & Schedule Performance
• A total of 31 states participated
• 12 high-performing states identified
• Five agency best practices and four contractor best practices
Pavement Smoothness Performance
• Using national safety statistics to identify top-performing management strategies
• Final report is due in May 2009
Highway Safety Performance
• It can be done!• Common definitions are a must• States do benefit from comparative
performance measures• Comparative performance measures
can identify best practices
Lessons Learned
• Continue monitoring and refining the first three sets of comparative performance measures.
• Continue to spotlight best practices among high-performers.
• Launch more comparative performance measures.
Next Steps
Questions?
Thank You!For more information, contact:
Mara Campbell Missouri Department of Transportation
(573) 526-2908