Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

12
8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 1/12 VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231- 4245 A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory © , ProQuest, U.S.A., EBSCO Publishing, U.S.A., Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A., Open J-Gage, India [link of the same is duly available at Inflibnet of University Grants Commission (U.G.C.)], The American Economic Association's electronic bibliography, EconLit, U.S.A., Index Copernicus Publishers Panel, Poland with IC Value of 5.09 & number of libraries all around the world. Circulated all over the world & Google has verified that scholars of more than 3412 Cities in 173 countries/territories are visiting our journal on regular basis.  #round $loor% Buildin& 'o *+-,-% Devi Bh!w!n B!!r% JA#AD.R 01 **0% 2!3un!n!&!r% .!ry!n!% 'DA http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

Transcript of Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

Page 1: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 1/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l DirectoriesIndexed & Listed at:

Ulrich's Periodicals Directory © , ProQuest, U.S.A., EBSCO Publishing, U.S.A., Cabell’s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A.,

Open J-Gage, India [link of the same is duly available at Inflibnet of University Grants Commission (U.G.C.)],

The American Economic Association's electronic bibliography, EconLit, U.S.A.,

Index Copernicus Publishers Panel, Poland with IC Value of 5.09 & number of libraries all around the world.

Circulated all over the world & Google has verified that scholars of more than 3412 Cities in 173 countries/territories are visiting our journal on regular basis.  

#round $loor% Buildin& 'o *+-,-% Devi Bh!w!n B!!r% JA#AD.R 01 **0% 2!3un!n!&!r% .!ry!n!% 'DA 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

Page 2: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 2/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

ii

ONTENTS

Sr.No.

TITLE & NAME OF THE AUTHOR (S) PageNo.

1  ANALYSIS OF TOMATO MARKETING IN UASIN- GISHU COUNTY, KENYA

YEGOH KENNETH KIMELI KOSGEY

1

2  INDIAN DISINVESTMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BETWEEN NDA & UPA

GOVERNMENTS

DR V S PURANIK & VIRUPAKSHA GOUD G

11

3  DEVELOPMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING: CASE STUDY IN PT TIMAH

PERSERO! TBK

IA. BUDHANANDA MUNIDEWI, EKO GANIS SUKOHARSONO & DR. ARI KAMAYANTI 

1"

#  TRENDS IN ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION OF TOURISM INDUSTRY TO INDIAN

ECONOMY

HARINI K.V & INDIRA M 

21

"  TOWARDS ENHANCING EFFICIENCY IN THE TRANSPORT INDUSTRY IN KENYA: ASTUDY OF THE ROAD AND RAIL TRANSPORT

ERIC LEWA KATANA & ABDULKARIM ABDULRAHMAN ABDULKARIM 

2"

$  EMERGING TRENDS IN THE MARKET OF EVENT MANAGEMENT: A LITERATURE

REVIEW

 ANTRIKSHA NEGI & RAVINDER PANT  

3%

  A STUDY ON INVESTORS' PERCEPTION TOWARDS DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND

MARKETS

DR. Y. NAGARAJU & SUMAN REDDY S 

33

(  RASHTRIYA SWASTHYA BHIMA YOJANA - COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH INSURANCE

SCHEME RSBY-CHIS! IN KERALA : A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS AND

UTILI)ATION OF THE SCHEME WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ERNAKULAM AND

WAYANAD DISTRICTS

DR. P. P. MINI

#1

*  TIME USE STUDIES TO EVALUATE UNPAID CARE WORK IN KERALA

 ANILA SKARIAH 

#

1%  BOARD STRUCTURE AND BANK PERFORMANCE: AN ETHIOPIAN SURVEY

 ARON HAILESELLASIE  

"3

11  FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE IN THE ANNUAL REPORTS OF LIBYAN BANKS: FROM

PREPARERS' PERSPECTIVES

DR. MUSA M. KRIBAT  

"*

12  APPRAISAL OF INFLUENCE OF MAJOR E+OGENOUS FACTORS ON VOLUME OF

LENDING BY DEPOSIT MONEY BANKS IN NIGERIA 1**% -2%11!

 ABDULLAHI SHEHU ARAGA 

$"

13  DOMESTIC ROOF WATER HARVESTING PRACTICES: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION

IN MEKELLE, ETHIOPIA

 ARAYA ABREHA

3

1#  PRICE DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION TRANSMISSION IN SPOT AND FUTURE

SEGMENTS FOR NSE "%: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY

PIYUSH PANDEY  

(%

1"  EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH OF INDUSTRIAL

UNDERTAKINGS AND MSME IN INDIA

 AMARENDRA BHUYAN

(3

RE.UEST FOR FEEDBACK & DISCLAIMER  (

Page 3: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 3/12

Page 4: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 4/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

iv

PROF/ NAWAB ALI KHANDep!rt3ent of ,o33erce% Ali&!rh Musli3 8niversity% Ali&!rh% 8P

PROF/ S/ P/ TIWARI.e!d% Dep!rt3ent of ?cono3ics Rur!l Develop3ent% Dr R!3 M!noh!r 9ohi! Av!dh 8niversity% $!i!b!d

DR/ ANIL CHANDHOKProfessor% $!culty of M!n!&e3ent% M!h!rishi M!r!ndeshw!r 8niversity% Mull!n!% A3b!l!% .!ry!n!

DR/ ASHOK KUMAR CHAUHANRe!der% Dep!rt3ent of ?cono3ics% 7urushetr!8niversity% 7urushetr!

DR/ SAMBHAVNA$!culty% 6M% Delhi

DR/ MOHENDER KUMAR GUPTAAssoci!te Professor% PJ9'#overn3ent,olle&e% $!rid!b!d

DR/ VIVEK CHAWLAAssoci!te Professor% 7urushetr! 8niversity% 7urushetr! 

DR/ SHIVAKUMAR DEENEAsst Professor% Dept of ,o33erce% "chool of Business "tudies% ,entr!l 8niversity of 7!rn!t!!% #ulb!r&! 

ASSO IATE EDITORS

 

PROF/ ABHAY BANSAL.e!d% Dep!rt3ent of nfor3!tion 6echnolo&y% A3ity "chool of ?n&ineerin& 6echnolo&y% A3ity 8niversity% 'oid!

PARVEEN KHURANAAssoci!te Professor% Mu!nd9!l'!tion!l,olle&e% 2!3un! '!&!r

SHASHI KHURANA Associ!te Professor% "M"7h!ls!9ub!n!#irls,olle&e% B!r!r!% A3b!l!

SUNIL KUMAR KARWASRAPrincip!l% A!!sh,olle&e of ?duc!tion% ,h!nder7!l!n% 6oh!n!% $!teh!b!d

DR/ VIKAS CHOUDHARY

Asst Professor% '6 (8niversity)% 7urushetr!

TE HNI AL ADVISOR

AMITA$!culty% #overn3ent M "% Moh!li

FINAN IAL ADVISORS

DICKIN GOYAL

Advoc!te 6!@ Adviser% P!nchul!NEENA

nvest3ent ,onsult!nt% ,h!3b!&h!t% "ol!n% .i3!ch!l Pr!desh

LEGAL ADVISORS

JITENDER S/ CHAHALAdvoc!te% Pun5!b .!ry!n! .i&h ,ourt% ,h!ndi&!rh 86

CHANDER BHUSHAN SHARMAAdvoc!te ,onsult!nt% District ,ourts% 2!3un!n!&!r !t J!&!dhri

SUPERINTENDENT

SURENDER KUMAR POONIA

Page 5: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 5/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

v

ALL FOR MANUS RIPTS

Ce invite unpublished novel% ori&in!l% e3piric!l !nd hi&h u!lity rese!rch wor pert!inin& to recent develop3ents pr!ctices in the !re!s of

,o3puter "cience Applic!tionsE ,o33erceE BusinessE $in!nceE M!retin&E .u3!n Resource M!n!&e3entE #ener!l M!n!&e3entE B!nin&E

?cono3icsE 6ouris3 Ad3inistr!tion M!n!&e3entE ?duc!tionE 9!wE 9ibr!ry nfor3!tion "cienceE Defence "tr!te&ic "tudiesE ?lectronic "cienceE

,orpor!te #overn!nceE ndustri!l Rel!tionsE !nd e3er&in& p!r!di&3s in !llied sub5ects lie Accountin&E Accountin& nfor3!tion "yste3sE Accountin&

6heory Pr!cticeE Auditin&E Beh!vior!l Accountin&E Beh!vior!l ?cono3icsE ,orpor!te $in!nceE ,ost Accountin&E ?cono3etricsE ?cono3ic

Develop3entE ?cono3ic .istoryE $in!nci!l nstitutions M!retsE $in!nci!l "ervicesE $isc!l PolicyE #overn3ent 'on Profit Accountin&E ndustri!l

Or&!ni!tionE ntern!tion!l ?cono3ics 6r!deE ntern!tion!l $in!nceE M!cro ?cono3icsE Micro ?cono3icsE Rur!l ?cono3icsE ,o-oper!tionE

De3o&r!phy4 Develop3ent Pl!nnin&E Develop3ent "tudiesE Applied ?cono3icsE Develop3ent ?cono3icsE Business ?cono3icsE Monet!ry PolicyE PublicPolicy ?cono3icsE Re!l ?st!teE Re&ion!l ?cono3icsE Politic!l "cienceE ,ontinuin& ?duc!tionE 9!bour Celf!reE PhilosophyE Psycholo&yE "ociolo&yE 6!@

Accountin&E Advertisin& Pro3otion M!n!&e3entE M!n!&e3ent nfor3!tion "yste3s (M")E Business 9!wE Public Responsibility ?thicsE

,o33unic!tionE Direct M!retin&E ?-,o33erceE #lob!l BusinessE .e!lth ,!re Ad3inistr!tionE 9!bour Rel!tions .u3!n Resource M!n!&e3entE

M!retin& Rese!rchE M!retin& 6heory Applic!tionsE 'on-Profit Or&!ni!tionsE Office Ad3inistr!tion/M!n!&e3entE Oper!tions Rese!rch/"t!tisticsE

Or&!ni!tion!l Beh!vior 6heoryE Or&!ni!tion!l Develop3entE Production/Oper!tionsE ntern!tion!l Rel!tionsE .u3!n Ri&hts DutiesE Public

Ad3inistr!tionE Popul!tion "tudiesE Purch!sin&/M!teri!ls M!n!&e3entE Ret!ilin&E "!les/"ellin&E "ervicesE "3!ll Business ?ntrepreneurshipE "tr!te&ic

M!n!&e3ent PolicyE 6echnolo&y/nnov!tionE 6ouris3 .ospit!lityE 6r!nsport!tion DistributionE Al&orith3sE Artifici!l ntelli&enceE ,o3pilers

6r!nsl!tionE ,o3puter Aided Desi&n (,AD)E ,o3puter Aided M!nuf!cturin&E ,o3puter #r!phicsE ,o3puter Or&!ni!tion ArchitectureE D!t!b!se

"tructures "yste3sE Discrete "tructuresE nternetE M!n!&e3ent nfor3!tion "yste3sE Modelin& "i3ul!tionE 'eur!l "yste3s/'eur!l 'etworsE

'u3eric!l An!lysis/"cientific ,o3putin&E Ob5ect Oriented Pro&r!33in&E Oper!tin& "yste3sE Pro&r!33in& 9!n&u!&esE RoboticsE "y3bolic $or3!l

9o&icE Ceb Desi&n !nd e3er&in& p!r!di&3s in !llied sub5ects

Anybody c!n sub3it the 0 045 of unpublished novelE ori&in!lE e3piric!l !nd hi&h u!lity 677869 06;/<8=>6?4 anytime in M.S. Word format  

!fter prep!rin& the s!3e !s per our GUIDELINES FOR SUBMISSIONE !t our e3!il !ddress ie infoi5rc3F&3!ilco3 or online by clicin& the lin 0=@?=7

><??0= !s &iven on our website (FOR ONLINE SUBMISSION, CLICK HERE )

GUIDELINES FOR SUBM ISSION OF MA NUS RIPT

  COVERING LETTER FOR SUBMISSION:

DATED:

THE EDITOR

JR,M

"ub5ect4  SUBMISSION OF MANUSCRIPT IN THE AREA OF/

7// F?=8=7M86;7?=HRMG7=768@ M8=87<7=E0=0<?P590@05L8C0<4>76ITE=?=776?=M897<8?0976, 4@787 47?5!

DEAR SIRMADAM 

Ple!se find 3y sub3ission of 3!nuscript entitled GHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH: for possible public!tion in your 5ourn!ls

hereby !ffir3 th!t the contents of this 3!nuscript !re ori&in!l $urther3ore% it h!s neither been published elsewhere in !ny l!n&u!&e fully or p!rtly% nor is it

under review for public!tion elsewhere

!ffir3 th!t !ll the !uthor (s) h!ve seen !nd !&reed to the sub3itted version of the 3!nuscript !nd their inclusion of n!3e (s) !s co-!uthor (s)

Also% if 3y/our 3!nuscript is !ccepted% /Ce !&ree to co3ply with the for3!lities !s &iven on the website of the 5ourn!l you !re free to publish our

contribution in !ny of your 5ourn!ls 

NAME OF CORRESPONDING AUTHOR4 

Desi&n!tion4

Affili!tion with full !ddress% cont!ct nu3bers Pin ,ode4 

Residenti!l !ddress with Pin ,ode4

Mobile 'u3ber (s)4

9!ndline 'u3ber (s)4

?-3!il Address4

Altern!te ?-3!il Address4

NOTES4

!)  6he whole 3!nuscript is reuired to be in ONE MS WORD FILE  only (pdf version is li!ble to be re5ected without !ny consider!tion)% which will st!rt fro3

the coverin& letter% inside the 3!nuscript

b)  6he sender is reuired to 3entionthe followin& in the SUBJECT COLUMN of the 3!il4

N7 M8=>6?4 06 R7?7 ?= 97 8678 0  ($in!nce/M!retin&/.RM/#ener!l M!n!&e3ent/?cono3ics/Psycholo&y/9!w/,o3puter/6/

?n&ineerin&/M!the3!tics/other% ple!se specify)

c)  6here is no need to &ive !ny te@t in the body of 3!il% e@cept the c!ses where the !uthor wishes to &ive !ny specific 3ess!&e wrt to the 3!nuscript

d)  6he tot!l sie of the file cont!inin& the 3!nuscript is reuired to be below "%% KB

e)  Abstr!ct !lone will not be considered for review% !nd the !uthor is reuired to sub3it the co3plete 3!nuscript in the first inst!nce

f)  6he 5ourn!l &ives !cnowled&e3ent wrt the receipt of every e3!il !nd in c!se of non-receipt of !cnowled&3ent fro3 the 5ourn!l% wrt the sub3ission

of 3!nuscript% within two d!ys of sub3ission% the correspondin& !uthor is reuired to de3!nd for the s!3e by sendin& sep!r!te 3!il to the 5ourn!l

>  MANUSCRIPT TITLE: 6he title of the p!per should be in ! > point ,!libri $ont t should be bold typed% centered !nd fully c!pit!lised

0  AUTHOR NAME S! & AFFILIATIONS:  6he !uthor (s) >@@ =8<7% 7?=8?0=% 8?@?8?0=  (s)% 867% <0?@7@8=@?=7 =><76% !nd 7<8?@8@76=87 7<8?@

867 should be in it!lic -point ,!libri $ont t 3ust be centered underne!th the title

+  ABSTRACT: Abstr!ct should be in fully it!licied te@t% not e@ceedin& >1* words 6he !bstr!ct 3ust be infor3!tive !nd e@pl!in the b!c&round% !i3s% 3ethods%

results conclusion in ! sin&le p!r! Abbrevi!tions 3ust be 3entioned in full

Page 6: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 6/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

vi

1  KEYWORDS: Abstr!ct 3ust be followed by ! list of eywords% sub5ect to the 3!@i3u3 of five 6hese should be !rr!n&ed in !lph!betic order sep!r!ted by

co33!s !nd full stops !t the end

I  MANUSCRIPT: M!nuscript 3ust be in BRITISH ENLISH  prep!red on ! st!nd!rd A+ sie !ORTR"IT SETTIN !"!ER t 3ust be prep!red on ! sin&le sp!ce !nd

sin&le colu3n with 3!r&in set for top% botto3% left !nd ri&ht t should be typed in = point ,!libri $ont with p!&e nu3bers !t the botto3 !nd centre of every

p!&e t should be free fro3 &r!33!tic!l% spellin& !nd punctu!tion errors !nd 3ust be thorou&hly edited

K  HEADINGS: All the he!din&s should be in ! * point ,!libri $ont 6hese 3ust be bold-f!ced% !li&ned left !nd fully c!pit!lised 9e!ve ! bl!n line before e!ch

he!din&

=  SUB-HEADINGS: All the sub-he!din&s should be in ! = point ,!libri $ont 6hese 3ust be bold-f!ced% !li&ned left !nd fully c!pit!lised

<  MAIN TE+T: 6he 3!in te@t should follow the followin& seuence4

INTRODUCTION

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

NEEDIMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

OBJECTIVES

HYPOTHESES

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONSSUGGESTIONS

CONCLUSIONS

SCOPE FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

APPENDI+ANNE+URE

t should be in ! = point ,!libri $ont% sin&le sp!ced !nd 5ustified 6he 3!nuscript should prefer!bly not e@ceed #$$$ WORDS

*  FIGURES &TABLES: 6hese should be si3ple% cryst!l cle!r% centered% sep!r!tely nu3bered self e@pl!ined% !nd ?@7 <> 7 807 97 8@7?>67 S0>67

0 88 90>@ 7 <7=?0=7 7@0 97 8@7?>67 t should be ensured th!t the t!bles/fi&ures !re referred to fro3 the 3!in te@t

  E.UATIONS:6hese should be consecutively nu3bered in p!rentheses% horiont!lly centered with eu!tion nu3ber pl!ced !t the ri&ht

>  REFERENCES: 6he list of !ll references should be !lph!betic!lly !rr!n&ed 6he !uthor (s) should 3ention only the !ctu!lly utilised references in the prep!r!tion

of 3!nuscript !nd they !re supposed to follow H8686 S5@7 0 R7767=?= 6he !uthor (s) !re supposed to follow the references !s per the followin&4

•  All wors cited in the te@t (includin& sources for t!bles !nd fi&ures) should be listed !lph!betic!lly

•  8se (7/) for one editor% !nd (7/! for 3ultiple editors

•  Chen listin& two or 3ore wors by one !uthor% use --- (>*@@)% such !s !fter 7ohl (<<K)% use --- (>**)% etc% in chronolo&ic!lly !scendin& order

•  ndic!te (openin& !nd closin&) p!&e nu3bers for !rticles in 5ourn!ls !nd for ch!pters in boos

•  6he title of boos !nd 5ourn!ls should be in it!lics Double uot!tion 3!rs !re used for titles of 5ourn!l !rticles% boo ch!pters% dissert!tions% reports% worin&

p!pers% unpublished 3!teri!l% etc

•  $or titles in ! l!n&u!&e other th!n ?n&lish% provide !n ?n&lish tr!nsl!tion in p!rentheses

•  6he loc!tion of endnotes within the te@t should be indic!ted by superscript nu3bers

PLEASE USE THE FOLLOWING FOR STYLE AND PUNCTUATION IN REFERENCES:

BOOKS 

•  Bowerso@% Don!ld J% ,loss% D!vid J% (<<I)% L9o&istic!l M!n!&e3entL 6!t! Mc#r!w% .ill% 'ew Delhi

•  .uner% .9 !nd AJ Cri&ht (<I0)% L$!ctors of ndustri!l 9oc!tion in OhioL Ohio "t!te 8niversity% 'i&eri!

CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOOKS 

•  "h!r3! 6% 7w!tr!% # (>**=) ?ffectiveness of "oci!l Advertisin&4 A "tudy of "elected ,!3p!i&ns% ,orpor!te "oci!l Responsibility% ?dited by D!vid ,rowther

'ichol!s ,!p!ldi% Ash&!te Rese!rch ,o3p!nion to ,orpor!te "oci!l Responsibility% ,h!pter 1% pp >=K-0*0

JOURNAL AND OTHER ARTICLES 

•  "che3enner% RC% .uber% J, !nd ,oo% R9 (<=K)% L#eo&r!phic Differences !nd the 9oc!tion of 'ew M!nuf!cturin& $!cilities%L Journ!l of 8rb!n ?cono3ics%

;ol >% 'o % pp =0-*+

CONFERENCE PAPERS 

•  #!r&% "!3bh!v (>*)4 LBusiness ?thicsL P!per presented !t the Annu!l ntern!tion!l ,onference for the All ndi! M!n!&e3ent Associ!tion% 'ew Delhi% ndi!%

<>> June

UNPUBLISHED DISSERTATIONS AND THESES 

•  7u3!r " (>*)4 L,usto3er ;!lue4 A ,o3p!r!tive "tudy of Rur!l !nd 8rb!n ,usto3ers%L 6hesis% 7urushetr! 8niversity% 7urushetr!

ONLINE RESOURCES 

•  Alw!ys indic!te the d!te th!t the source w!s !ccessed% !s online resources !re freuently upd!ted or re3oved

WEBSITES 

•  #!r&% Bh!vet (>*)4 6ow!rds ! 'ew '!tur!l #!s Policy% Politic!l Ceely% ;iewed on J!nu!ry *% >*> http4//epwin/user/view!bstr!ct5sp

Page 7: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 7/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

INDIAN DISINVESTMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION BETWEEN NDA & UPA GOVERNMENTS

DR. % S !UR"NIK

!ROFESSOR & HE"D

DE!"RTMENT OF MB"

B"S"%ESHW"R ENINEERIN COLLEE

B""LKOT

%IRU!"KSH" OUD

 "SST. !ROFESSOR

DE!"RTMENT OF MB"

B.%.%.S"NH"'S "IEMS

BID"DI

ABSTRACTT/is st+* is $i!+ t" i+!nti#* $n+ !-$%$t! +i##!!n)! !t0!!n t0" $%%i$n)! 1"-!n!nts in t!s "# Disin-!st!nt i'%!!nt$ti"n $n+ '!#"$n)!, i#

+i##!!n)! '!sists 0/$t is t/! +!1!! "# t/$t +i##!!n)!, st+* $is t" i+!nti#* )/$%%!n1!s $n+ !t/"+"%"1i!s $+"'t!+ #" Disin-!st!nt i'%!!nt$ti"n.

Disin-!st!nt P!#"$n)! !-$%$t!+ sin1 %ti'%! '$$!t!s %i2! Disin-!st!nt T$1!t T$2!n, M!t/"+s s!+, N! "# PSU3s )"nsi+!!+, '!)!nt$1! "#

t$1!t )"nsi+!!+ $1$inst B+1!t $n+ #is)$% +!#i)it. E-!n t/"1/ t0" +i##!!nt In+i$n '"%iti)$% $%%i$n)!s $! 'sin1 sii%$ !)"n"i) '"%i)i!s, int!!stin1

+!$)$ti"n is #"n+ 0/i%! i'%!!ntin1 s$! !)"n"i) '"%i)i!s $n+ t/! +!1!! "# i'%!!nt$ti"n. T/! $i "# t/is $ti)%! is t" $n$%*4! t/! '!#"$n)! "#

 'i-$ti4$ti"n !t0!!n t0" '"%iti)$% $%%i$n)!s.

KEYWORDS 

An!lysis of ndi!n Disinvest3ent% ndi!n Priv!ti!tion% 'DA disinvest3ent% "u33!ry of ndi!n disinvest3ent% 8PA disinvest3ent

INTRODUCTIONince >1 ye!rs ndi! is run by &roup of politic!l p!rties r!ther th!n one politic!l p!rty% ndi! possess such two 3!5or !lli!nces one is 8nited pro&ressive

!lli!nce led by ndi!n '!tion!l ,on&ress !nd other one is '!tion!l De3ocr!tic !lli!nce 9ed By Bh!r!tiy!J!n!t! P!rty 8PA !lli!nce &overn3ent is

co3pletin& * ye!rs in the office !s ! rulin& p!rty ?ven both !lli!nces !re differentE ?cono3ic Policy such !s Priv!ti!tion is i3ple3ented by both the

!lli!nces% this study !i3ed !t !n!lyin& 8PA:s Disinvest3entperfor3!nce vis-!-vis with 'DA &overn3ent

$or !n!lysis purpose% this !rticle considered 'DA:s 1 ye!rs &overn3ent durin& <<<->**+ versus 8PA:s >**< >*+ &overn3ent%this study h!s not

considered 8PA- &overn3ent disinvest3ent perfor3!nce durin& >**+ to >**< bec!use of 8PA:s intern!l ch!llen&es fro3 9eft front p!rties !&!inst

disinvest3ent 8PA- disinvest3ent tr!c record is !bys3!l durin& >**+->**< ,o33on Mini3u3 Pro&r!3 prep!red by 8PA- (ie >**+-*<) is unf!vor!ble to

Priv!ti!tion

PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISES IN INDIA"ince ndependence% ndi! h!s invested l!r&e !3ount of its revenue resources into buildin& co33erci!l enterprises Over the period% ndi! h!s built l!r&e

co33erci!l enterprises in v!rious for3s

As per the ,o3ptroller !nd Audit #ener!l of ndi! (,A#) report >**+-*1

  About >** public co33erci!l enterprises controlled by union !nd st!te &overn3ents

>  Around +** non co33erci!l !utono3ous bodies !nd !uthorities owned or controlled by union or st!te &overn3ents

0  Over ++** !uthorities !nd bodies subst!nti!lly fin!nced fro3 union or st!te revenues

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY"ince 01 ye!rs world is under&oin& 3!5or econo3ic refor3s% speci!lly refor3s in ter3s of Business liber!li!tion% #lob!li!tion !nd Priv!ti!tion ?cono3ic

rese!rch h!s shown th!t econo3ic refor3s h!ve helped in !llevi!tin& poverty (.i3!nshu) M!ny of the developin& countries h!ve !&&ressively persu!ded 9P#

policy since <=* ndi! h!s st!rted econo3ic refor3s in << !nd shown f!ster econo3ic &rowth co3p!red to previous dec!des.owever &!p found in cert!in

!re!s lie disinvest3ent !&!inst !ssu3ed t!r&et

6his study &ives nowled&e on !chieve3ent of ndi!n Disinvest3ent !nd rel!tive perfor3!nce of two different &overn3ents 6his helps econo3ist to predict

&overn3ent disinvest3ent beh!vior !nd such beh!vior 3!y be used durin& invest3ent decision 3!in&

EVOLUTION OF PRIVATI)ATION?ven thou&h priv!ti!tion e@!3ples c!n be noticed durin& '!i &overn3ent in #er3!ny% 6he credit of 3odern priv!ti!tion &oes to M!r&!ret 6h!tcher

&overn3ent% #overn3ent of ?n&l!nd h!s st!rted priv!ti!tion in <K< with BP (British Petroleu3)% British Aerosp!ce (<=)% '!tion!l $rei&ht ,orp (<=>) !nd so

on6hen the !dv!nt!&e of Priv!ti!tion spre!d !cross the world !nd the priv!ti!tion !&&ressively persu!ded by south A3eric!n countries lie ,hile% Br!il%

Ar&entin! 6he !dv!nt!&e of priv!ti!tion even spre!d to co33unist countries lie 8""R !nd ,hin! n the l!st 01 ye!rs world h!s seen 3ore th!n %**%*** fir3s

under&one priv!ti!tion (John 'ellis% >**1) ?ven thou&h '!i &overn3ent h!s st!rted the priv!ti!tion% t w!s 3ore of Politic!l in n!ture r!ther econo3ic

oriented (#er3!Bel)% 6h!tcher &overn3ent priv!ti!tion w!s econo3ic oriented not politic!l one

ndi!n Disinvest3ent (priv!ti!tion) st!rted bec!use of the econo3ic!l co3pulsions inste!d of econo3ic vision policy ?cono3ic!l co3pulsions such !s hi&h

$isc!l deficit% B!l!nce of p!y3ent crisis% current !ccount deficits !nd ntern!tion!l institutions !re re!son behind the econo3ic refor3s !nd priv!ti!tion 6he

credit of initi!tin& priv!ti!tion in ndi! &oes to "hri P ; '!r!si3h!r!o &overn3ent% &overn3ent st!rted priv!ti!tion by sellin& 0 co3p!nies in its first !tte3pt

PRIVATI)ATION METHOD IN INDIA6his study noticed interestin& observ!tions onus!&e of disinvest3ent 3ethod in ndi!"urprisin&ly% ndi! follows ! rel!tively different str!te&y to i3ple3ent

priv!ti!tion 6he first notice!ble difference is in its n!3e% ndi! repl!ced intern!tion!lly nown Priv!ti!tion word by Disinvest3ent As per the diction!ry%the 3e!nin& of Disinvest3ent is withdr!w!l of nvest3ent

ntern!tion!lly priv!ti!tion i3ple3ented throu&h v!rious 3ethods% !3on& such 3ethods% 3ost popul!r !re (R!noJelic >**0)% (ArbenM!l!5 >**0)

Public Offers

> "tr!te&ic "!le

Page 8: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 8/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

>

0 ;oucher priv!ti!tion

+ M!n!&e3ent ?3ployee buyout (M?BO)

1 "!le throu&h 3utu!l funds !nd $in!nci!l nstitutions

ndi! 3!inly followed first two 3ethods to i3ple3ent priv!ti!tion% in the be&innin&% &overn3ent st!rted priv!ti!tion by issuin& sh!res to 3utu!l fund

co3p!nies% l!ter &overn3ent !dopted public offer 3odel Durin& 'DA re&i3e% &overn3ent !dopted str!te&ic s!le 3ethod to i3ple3ent priv!ti!tion

"tr!te&ic "!le is ! s!le which & ives speci!l i3port!nce to identifyin& !ppropri!te priv!te co3p!ny to purch!se !nd 3!n!&e Public "ector ?nterprises so th!t

future of Public "ector ?nterprise is secured !nd well 3!n!&ed

Public Offer "!le is ! s!le where in &overn3ent sell Public "ector ?nterprises throu&h initi!l public offer !nd so3eti3es sellin& sh!res in bul u!ntity to

fin!nci!l institutions

INDIAN DISINVESTMENT PROCESS#overn3ent Of ndi! h!s 3!int!ined Disinvest3ent Process rel!tively 3ore 6r!nsp!rent% !ny disinvest3ent propos!l first need to &et !pprov!l fro3 ,,D

(,!binet co33ittee on Disinvest3ent 6hen proceeded to "election of !dvisor by co3petitive biddin& !dvertise3ent% prep!rin& infor3!tion 3e3or!ndu3%

si&nin& of confidenti!lity !&ree3ent selected bidders% prep!rin& dr!ft sh!re purch!se !&ree3ent with the help of le&!l !dvisors% Prep!rin& fin!l dr!ft with the

consult!tion of nter Ministeri!l #roup% conductin& Due dili&ence% conductin& v!lu!tion% coordin!tion with respective dep!rt3ents% invitin& fin!l bindin&

fin!nci!l bids

After e@!3in!tion% !n!lysis !nd ev!lu!tion% the reco33end!tion of the M# !re pl!ced before the core &roup of secret!ries on disinvest3ent (,#D)% whose

reco33end!tions !re pl!ced before the ,,D for ! fin!l decision re&!rdin& selection of str!te&ic p!rtner% si&nin& of the sh!re purch!se !&ree3ent !nd

sh!reholders !&ree3ent !nd other rel!ted issues

6he disinvest3ent process h!s been &uided by reco33end!tion 3!de by co33ittee on disinvest3ent set up in <<0 n the ye!r <<I% &overn3ent set up

disinvest3ent co33ission to desi&n !nd e@ecutive the priv!ti!tion of P"8:s Disinvest3ent process 3!de 3ore tr!nsp!rent% the dep!rt3ent sends !ll its

records to ,A# for verific!tion% !s on d!te it is pool proof fro3 corruption however issue !re r!ised with respect v!lu!tion

NDA & UPA ALLIANANCE GOVERNMENTSNDA GOVERNMENT

'!tion!l De3ocr!tic Alli!nce ('DA) led by Bh!r!tiy!J!n!t! P!rty (BJP) w!s for3ed soon !fter <<= &ener!l elections (>th

9o"!bh!)to cl!i3 &overn3entfor3!tion !t centr!l level 6he defe!t of ndi!n '!tion!l con&ress !nd 6hird front p!rties (A &roup of "t!te level politic!l p!rties !nd co33unist p!rties) resulted

for3!tion of 'DA !lli!nce 6he 'DA &overn3ent l!sted for 0 3onths until 3id-<<< when the AADM7 withdrew its support to &overn3ent

6he f!ll of 'DA &overn3ent resulted to <<< &ener!l elections (0th

9o"!bh!) n the <<< &ener!l elections% the BJP led 'DA won 0*0 se!ts out of 1+0 se!ts in

the 9o"!bh!% there by securin& co3fort!ble !nd st!ble 3!5ority On 0th

 October BJP 9e!der "hriAt!lBih!ri ;!5p!yee too o!th !s Pri3e Minister of ndi! third

ti3e !nd led the &overn3ent until +th

9o"!bh! elections held durin& April-M!y >**+ 

UPA-1 GOVERNMENT

8nited Pro&ressive Alli!nce (8PA) led by ndi!n '!tion!l ,on&ress w!s for3ed soon !fter >**+ &ener!l elections (April-M!y >**+) to cl!i3 &overn3ent

for3!tion !t centr!l level 8PA for3!tion tri&&ered bec!use of elector!l defe!t of rulin& Bh!r!tiy!J!n!t! p!rty led 'DA &overn3ent 8PA won >>> se!ts !&!inst

'DA:s I< in the 1+0 3e3ber p!rli!3ent 9eft p!rties pl!yed ! vit!l role in for3!tion of 8PA !lli!nceE left front h!d 1< MP:s (includes ,PM% ,P% $orw!rd Bloc

!nd R"P) 6he other p!rties which supported 8PA &overn3ents were "!3!5w!di P!rty - 0< MP:s%B!hu5!n"!3!5 P!rty - < MP:s

6he 8PA- &overn3ent w!s dependent on cruci!l support of 9eft front which h!d 1< MP:s in the p!rli!3ent% 3!y be this w!s the re!son behind not t!in& !ny

disinvest3ent t!r&et durin& >**+ to >**< ,o33on Mini3u3 Pro&r!3 >**+ st!ted unf!vor!ble to priv!ti!tion 9eft front h!s withdr!wn its support due to

nucle!r !&ree3ent with 8"A n the subseuent election% 8PA developed !n !lli!nce with 6rin!3ool,on&ress in the left front p!rties do3in!nt west Ben&!l

UPA-2 GOVERNMENT

6he 8PA-> &ot re-elected in the >**< &ener!l elections with the incre3ent of 1I p!rli!3ent se!ts 6he other 3!5or hi&hli&hts of >**< &ener!l elections !re 'DA!lli!nce support further dwindled% BJP:s tot!l p!rli!3ent se!ts decre!sed to > fro3 0= 6he other i3port!nt develop3ent is decline of 9eft $ront fro3 1<

se!ts to >+ 6he >**< &ener!l elections &!ve ! co3fort!ble 3!5ority to 8PA !lli!nce 6he !bsence of 9eft front in the 8PA% encour!&ed &overn3ent to c!rry on

3uch needed econo3ic refor3s 8PA &overn3ent st!rted Disinvest3ent by t!in& ye!rly t!r&et in the !nnu!l bud&et

PRIVATI)ATION PERFORMANCE

2e!r 'u3ber of P"?:s

considered per

ye!r

Dis:t

6!r&et

Bud&et ?sti3!tes

Actu!ls

Disinvest

-3ent

Dis:t 6!r&et%

Percent!&e of

Bud&et

Dis:t

Percent!&e of fisc!l

deficit

Bud&et

?sti3!tes

(Actu!ls)

<< <> +K >1** 0*0= >> =* (0KK<>) 0*> (R?)

<<> <0 01 >1** <0 >* 1> (0IK>>) >+K>I (R?)

<<0N<+ I 01** Proceeds received in <+-<1 >+0 * (1=11) +0=K> (R?)

<<+ -<1 0 +*** +=+0 >+I K< (I*01) I>>K> (R?)

<<1-<I 1 K*** 0I 0< *I (I*>+0) K=>K1

<<I-<K 1*** 0=* >+= *I (IIK00) >***K

<<K-<= +=** <* > (=I0+1) >0>*I=

<<=-<< 1 1*** 10K K< +K (00+=) >K<0II

<<<-** + **** =I* 00 K (*+KK) ><=*=+

>***-* + **** =K 0 I (==I) 0>1I

>**-*> * >*** 1I1= 00 + (+*<11) 0I>+10

>**>-*0 I >*** 00+= >=< 00 (+1+II) ++I>

>**0-*+ < +1** 11+K 0 >>(>K+<) +K0I=

>**+-*1 > +*** >KI1 *= >(>I+=0) +<KI=>

>**1-*I 'o 6&t 1I< * *=<(K+K=0) 1*I>0

>**I-*K * 'o 6&t ---- * *(=01=) 1=00=K

>**K-*= 0 'o 6&t += * >I(1+<II) K>IK

>**=-*< * 'o 6&t ---- * *(+1K+<=) ==0<1I

>**<-* 1 'o 6&t >0110 * 1+(+0>K+>) *>++=K

>**- I +**** >>KI> 0I I*(0K0=<>) *=K+<

>*-> > +**** 0=<+ 0* >I(1I><*) 0*+0I1

>*>-0 = 0**** >0<1I >* +1(1>>>1) +0*=>1>*0-+ < +**** 11< >+ *(1+>+<<) II1><K

('ote4 for the ye!r >**<-*% Disinvest3ent t!r&et !ssu3ed !ver!&e percent!&e of + ye!rs of re3!inin& period% ie >K1 of bud&et !ctu!ls .ence disinvest3ent

t!r&et of >**<-* is !ssu3ed !s >K1 of Rs *>++=K crores ie Rs >1I> crores $or c!lcul!tion purpose)

(Dis:t Disinvest3ent% #ovt #overn3ent% ,r crores% yrs2e!rs%)

Page 9: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 9/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OA Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refe

C0<486?0= 0 NDA 076=<7= " 5786 1***-%% 0 2

 

6ype of

#ovt

'o of

co:s for 1 yrs

Dis:

6!r

 6!

(in c

'DA <<<-** to>**0-*+ 00 1=1

8PA >**<-* to >*0-+ 0* K1

 

DISINVESTMENT TARGET FI+ING?ither of the two different &overn3ents h!s not t!e

!ver!&e of 0*<= disinvest3ent t!r&et of the bud&e

(!ver!&e of + ye!rs) 'DA &overn3ent h!s t!en *0+=

the initi!l ye!rs !nd &r!du!lly decre!sed the t!r&et !s t

deficit

UPA 8= NDA D??=7<7= ?<4@7<7=8?0= >6?= 6

'ote4- Q !@is indic!tes percent!&e of !chieve3ent% y-

different% n c!se of 8PA% &overn3ent h!s preferred !c

to hi&her percent!&e of !chieve3ent !s their ter3 !pp

DISINVESTMENT METHOD USED BY UPA &Disinvest3ent 3ethod used

"tr!te&ic "!le Method

Public Offer% Bul sh!re s!le t

6ot!l

C0<48=?7 S0@ T960>9 S687? S8@7 M790:- M

'DA &overn3ent used str!te&ic s!le 3ethod to sell

3ethod

8PA &overn3ent h!s not used str!te&ic s!le 3ethod

3ethod 

DISINVESTMENT PERFORMANCE INTERMS

Both the !lli!nce &overn3ent !s shown l!r&e dissi3

&overn3ent h!s !chieved >> disinvest3ent !&!inst

f isc!l deficit since be&innin& of disinvest3ent 8PA &o

fisc!l deficit in the $2 >**<-* !nd >**- respectively

RECOMMENDATIONS  6his study identifies l!c in !ny specific 3ethod

cert!in Disinvest3ent 6!r&et fi@!tion 3ethodolo&

>  6his study identifies ! continuous &!p in disinve

reco33end!tion is settin& up !n ?@pert co

i3ple3ent!tion

LIMATATION  6his study h!s considered only 1 ye!rs of >

nd ter3

>  $2 >**<-* Disinvest3ent t!r&et is !ssu3ed !s >

*

1*

)**

)1*

)st ye

*O>*O+*OI*O=*O

)**O

 

F RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICeed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

%%3-%#! V76> UPA-2 ?7 5786 ?/7/ 2%%*-1% 0 2%13-1#!, ?>67

et

en

r)

Dis:t

6!r&et

!chieved

(in cr)

Percent!&e

Achieve3ent

A&!inst

6!r&et

Aver!&e

percent!&e of

t!r&et of bud&et

( of1 yrs)

Percent!&

for 1 ye!rs

* >=>=+ +=0+ 0*<= ++0< (1

> =<K1I 1* >K1 0KI (1 y

n fi@ed percent!&e of disinvest3ent t!r&et !&!inst bud&et or fis

t for 1 ye!rs 8PA &overn3ent h!s t!en !ver!&e >K1 !s ! d

3ore t!r&et th!n the 8PA &overn3entE however both the &ove

er3 !ppro!ches t is not cle!r we!ther disinvest3ent t!r&et t!e

>@?= 7=>67:

@is indic!tes ye!r in the &iven ter3 6he beh!viour of two &ove

hievin& hi&her disinvest3ent in the initi!l ye!rs% while 'DA h!s &r

  o!ches Perfor3!nce Beh!viour foundopposite in n!ture/

DA GOVERNMENT'DA Alli!nce #overn3ent 8PA Alli!nc

> S 6D, Properties *

fin!nci!l institution > 0*

00 0*

9% BA9,O% 9JM,% ,M,% .69% ;"'9% BP% PP9% .,% .9% P,9% J,9 !nd

> public sector enterprises !nd 6D, hotel properties loc!ted in

to sell !ny Public "ector ?nterprise%t h!s sold public sector

F FISCAL DEFICIT

il!rity in ter3s of disinvest3ent !&!inst fisc!l deficit% l!r&e v!r

$isc!l deficit in the l!st ye!r of its &overn3ent ter3 !nd it is ever

ern3ent disinvested hi&her in the initi!l ye!rs of its &overn3en

% l!ter its perfor3!nce &r!du!lly decre!sed !&!inst fisc!l deficit

olo&y followed to decide Disinvest3ent t!r&et Our reco33end

y in ter3s of percent!&e either !&!inst esti3!ted bud&et or esti3

t3ent !chieve3ent versus set t!r&et since >+ ye!rs irrespective

3ittee to desi&n better !nd !ccept!ble 3ethodolo&y !nd

of 8PA &overn3ent !nd e@cluded st

 ter3 of 8PA rulin&

1% by t!in& !ver!&e of b!l!nce + ye!rs 8PA-> &overn3ent:s t!r

  r >nd ye!r 0rd ye!r +th ye!r 1th ye!r

'DA

8PA

*O>*O+*OI*O=*O

)**O

 ISSN   2231-4245 

S & MANAGEMENT ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

0

?= I=?8= 6>477

e !chieve3ent of fisc!l deficit

yr deficit RsI0K*0cr)

r deficit Rs>0=II+=cr)

c!l deficit 'DA &overn3ent h!s t!en

isinvest3ent t!r&et !&!inst the bud&et

n3ents h!ve preferred 3ore t!r&ets in

n usin& the bud&et fi&ures or esti3!ted

rn3ents% disinvest3ent !chieve3ent is

du!lly 3oved fro3 lower !chieve3ent

#overn3ent

6D, hotel properties

different cities%!p!rt fro3 public offer

nterprises throu&h only Public offer

i!tion between e!ch ye!r found% 'DA

i&hest percent!&e !chieve3ent !&!inst

% it h!s disinvested 1+ !nd I !&!inst

tion is #overn3ent reuired to !dopt

!ted fisc!l deficit

of !ny ind of &overn3ent .ence our

process for successful disinvest3ent

&et

Page 10: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 10/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

+

0  6his !rticle sub3itted on M!rch >% >*+% !ssu3in& th!t no 3ore disinvest3ent is possible in $2 >*0-+ due to offici!l !nnounce3ent of #ener!l

?lections !nd 3odel code of conduct fro3 1th

 M!rch >*+

CONCLUSION"o3e of the str!i&ht conclusion wh!t we c!n dr!w fro3 the !bove disinvest3ent perfor3!nce of different !lli!nce is% 9eft $ront p!rticip!tion in the &overn3ent

will hold b!c disinvest3ent 9ooin& !t the perfor3!nce% 'DA !lli!nce is rel!tively 3ore !&&ressive th!n the 8PA !lli!nce &overn3ent 'DA &overn3ent h!s

used "tr!te&ic "!le 3ethod !lon& with public offer s!le however 8PA &overn3ent h!s preferred only public offer 3ethod n ter3s of t!in& the t!r&et 8PA

&overn3ent is l!&&in& by >0 with the 'DA &overn3ent 3port!nt point is the de&ree of disinvest3ent i3ple3ent!tion differs between two different

!lli!nces but not policy

REFERENCES  ArbenM!l!5% $!t3irMe3! (J!n >**0)% St$t!1i) 'i-$ti4$ti"n, Its $)/i!-!!nts $n+ )/$%%!n1!s5 % worin& p!per +% B!3ber& 8niversity

>  ,o3ptroller Auditor &ener!l of ndi! (>**+)% C&AG !'"t 677897:%

0  Dep!rt3ent Disinvest3ent (>**0) Disin-!st!nt M$n$%5 % #overn3ent of ndi!

+  Dep!rt3ent of Disinvest3ent (>*+) S$*5 G"-!n!nt "# In+i$ 

1  Dep!rt3ent of Public enterprises (>*->)  '!s-!* 67;;9;6%Dep!rt3ent Of Public ?nterprises% #overn3ent of ndi!

I  DrBerh!nuMen&istu% Dr2!con .!il M!ri!3% Pi-$ti4$ti"n in T/!"* $n+ P$)ti)!< T/! iss!s t" ! )"nsi+!!+  6he Journ!l of Applied business rese!rch

;ol 1% 'o +

K  ?lection ,o33ission of ndi!

=  #er3TBel (>**<)  A1$inst t/!M$inst!$< N$4i Pi-$ti4$ti"n in ;=>73s G!$n*5 % 6he ?cono3ic .istory Review% ;olu3e I0% ssue

<  .i3!nshu (>**=) #rowth% e3ploy3ent !nd poverty reduction4 post refor3s ndi!n e@perience% worin& p!per >0% Asi! Rese!rch centre% 9ondon school

of econo3ics

*  John 'ellis (M!rch >**I)% Pi-$ti4$ti"n9A s$* Ass!ss!nt % Corin& P!per =K% ,enter for #lob!l Develop3ent

  Joshi% ;i5!y !nd M D 9ittle <<I. In+i$3s E)"n"i) R!#"s ;==;9677;% O@ford 8niversity Press

>  M!5!Dr!ic (>**K)% Pi-$ti4$ti"n in E)"n"i) T/!"*  PA'O?,O'OM,8"% >**K% % str *0-= 8D, 00=>+I*>1==400*=

0  M!@i3 Boyco% Andrei "hleifer% Robert C ;ishny (Dec <<>)% V")/! Pi-$ti4$ti"n% #7% .!rw!rd 8niversity% !nd university ,hic!&o

+  Milinds!thye (JA'-M!rch >**1) Pi-$ti4$ti"n, '!#"$n)! $n+ !##i)i!n)*< A st+* "# In+i$n B$n2s% ;7A9PA% volu3e 0*% 'o %

1  Peter "chofield% Public ?nterprises P!rtnerships 6e!3% (M!r >**>)E I'%!!ntin1 Pi-$ti4$ti"n< t/! UK E?'!i!n)!% .M 6re!sury% 87

I  Pl!nnin& ,o33ission (Ith

 Dec >*0) D$t$ T$%!% #overn3ent of ndi!

K  R7Mishr!% P#eet! !nd B'!veen (>**>) @Pi-$ti4$ti"n< T/! E-"%ti"n "# In+i$n T/"1/t % An3ol Public!tions% 'ew Delhi

=  R!noJelic% Rich!rd Briston !nd Colf&!n& Aussene&& (>**0)% T/! C/"i)! "# Pi-$ti4$ti"n M!t/"+ $n+ t/! #in$n)i$% '!#"$n)! "# n!0%* 'i-$ti4!+ #is in

t$nsiti"n !)"n"i!s5, 0* (K) (=) % Journ!l of Business $in!nce Accountin&

<  "urendr! 7 7!ushi (<<K)% In+i$3s E-"%-in1 E)"n"i) "+!%, A '!s'!)ti-! "n E)"n"i) $n+ in$n)i$% R!#"s5 ;ol 1I% 'o % A3eric!n Journ!l of

?cono3ics !nd "ociolo&y

>*  6 6 R!3 Moh!n (>**+ , Pi-$ti4$ti"n in C/in$< s"#t%*, s"#t%* +"!s it  

>  ;ipin M!li ("ept >**0) Disin-!st!nt in In+i$< N!!+ C/$n1! in Min+s!t% ;7A9PA% volu3e >=% 'o-0

WEBSITES

>>  citeseer@istpsuedu/viewdoc/downlo!dUdoi*00pdf% Disinvest3ent Policy% Procedure !nd pro&ress

>0  dpenicin/public!tions/pesurveyH>*->% Public ?nterprises "urvey >*->

>+  http4//indi!bud&etnicin/% Bud&et records

>1  http4//p3indi!nicin/c3ppdf% ,o33on 3ini3u3 pro&r!3E >**+% 8nited Pro&ressive !lli!nce

>I  http4//wwwc!&&ovin% ,o3ptroller Auditor #roup of ndi! (,A#)%

>K  http4//wwwdivestnicin/DisHM!nu!l!sp% disinvest3ent 3!nu!ls >** !nd >**0

>=  http4//wwwdivestnicin/whit>*p!perpdf% Chite p!per on disinvest3ent of centr!l public sector enterprises #overn3ent Of ndi!% Ministry of

$in!nce% Dep!rt3ent of disinvest3ent%

><  wwwdivestnicin/ch!p<!sp % Disinvest3ent Process

Page 11: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 11/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories 

http4//i5rc3or&in/ 

1

RE(UEST FOR FEEDB"CK

D786 R7876 

At the very outset% ntern!tion!l Journ!l of Rese!rch in ,o33erce% ?cono3ics M!n!&e3ent (JR,M)

!cnowled&es !ppreci!tes your efforts in showin& interest in our present issue under your ind perus!l

would lie to reuest you tosupply your critic!l co33ents !nd su&&estions !bout the 3!teri!l published

in this issue !s well !s on the 5ourn!l !s ! whole% on our ?-3!il?=0?6<<8?@/0<  for further

i3prove3ents in the interest of rese!rch

f youh!ve !ny ueries ple!se feel free to cont!ct us on our ?-3!il ?=0?6<<8?@/0<

!3 sure th!t your feedb!c !nd deliber!tions would 3!e future issues better ! result of our 5oint

effort

9ooin& forw!rd !n !ppropri!te consider!tion

Cith sincere re&!rds

6h!nin& you profoundly

A87<?8@@5 50>6

"d/-C0-06?=806 

DISCLAIMER6he infor3!tion !nd opinions presented in the Journ!l reflect the views of the !uthors !nd not of the

Journ!l or its ?ditori!l Bo!rd or the Publishers/?ditors Public!tion does not constitute endorse3ent by the

 5ourn!l 'either the Journ!l nor its publishers/?ditors/?ditori!l Bo!rd nor !nyone else involved in cre!tin&%

producin& or deliverin& the 5ourn!l or the 3!teri!ls cont!ined therein% !ssu3es !ny li!bility or

responsibility for the !ccur!cy% co3pleteness% or usefulness of !ny infor3!tion provided in the 5ourn!l% norsh!ll they be li!ble for !ny direct% indirect% incident!l% speci!l% conseuenti!l or punitive d!3!&es !risin&

out of the use of infor3!tion/3!teri!l cont!ined in the 5ourn!l 6he 5ourn!l% nor its publishers/?ditors/

?ditori!l Bo!rd% nor !ny other p!rty involved in the prep!r!tion of 3!teri!l cont!ined in the 5ourn!l

represents or w!rr!nts th!t the infor3!tion cont!ined herein is in every respect !ccur!te or co3plete% !nd

they !re not responsible for !ny errors or o3issions or for the results obt!ined fro3 the use of such

3!teri!l Re!ders !re encour!&ed to confir3 the infor3!tion cont!ined herein with other sources 6he

responsibility of the contents !nd the opinions e@pressed in this 5ourn!l is e@clusively of the !uthor (s)

concerned

Page 12: Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

8/11/2019 Comparative Govt Performance of Privatization

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comparative-govt-performance-of-privatization 12/12

VOLUME NO. 4 (2014), ISSUE NO. 07  (JULY)  ISSN   2231-4245 

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT A Monthly Double-Blind Peer Reviewed (Refereed/Juried) Open Access ntern!tion!l e-Journ!l - ncluded in the ntern!tion!l "eri!l Directories