Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study...

67
Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue, SW Suite 550 Washington, DC 20024 www.hschange.org Technical Publication No. 48 September 2003

Transcript of Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study...

Page 1: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Community Tracking Study

2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook

(Release 1)

600 Maryland Avenue, SW Suite 550

Washington, DC 20024 www.hschange.org

Technical Publication No.

48

September 2003

Page 2: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File 2000/2001 Data

Introduction This codebook describes the Community Tracking Study Round Three Physician Survey Public Use File, CTSR3PP1.TXT. The file, which is distributed in ASCII format, contains 131 variables and 12,406 physician-level records. The unique record identifier and sort key is the variable PHYSIDX. In addition to this introduction, the codebook consists of three parts, an alphabetical listing of the variables, a positional listing of the variables, and the main portion of the codebook containing counts, percentages, and descriptive information on a variable-by-variable basis. Codebook Sections The variables included on the file are grouped and ordered based on the questions appearing in the various sections of the survey instrument, with two additional sections for non-questionnaire related variables. Imputation flags follow the corresponding imputed variable while constructed variables are inserted next to, or in some cases, in place of the applicable survey questionnaire variable.

Survey Administration Variables Section A: Introduction Section B: Utilization of Time Section C: Type and Size of Practice Section D: Medical Care Management Section F: Physician-Patient Interactions Section G: Practice Revenue Section H: Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Weights and Sampling Variables Variable Listings

The codebook contains lists of the variables on the file in alphabetical and positional order. Each list includes the variable name, start and end column position, and a brief description or label for the variable. This description is limited to 40 characters and is prefaced by the following indicators: "PH" indicates the Physician Survey, and "3" indicates the round of data collection. The questionnaire item number, "CV" (to denote a constructed variable), or "AMA/AOA" (to denote a variable from the external AMA or AOA files) follows these indicators. The same 40 character descriptions are also provided in the LABEL statement section of the SAS user file provided with the public use file. Main Codebook The main portion of the codebook follows the alphabetical and positional listings. Unweighted counts, cumulative counts, percentages, and cumulative percentages for each variable are displayed. The counts and percentages for each variable are arranged such that valid, non-missing data appears first, followed by missing data ("-8 Don't Know"), and concluding with inapplicable ("-1") responses which were not asked due to skip pattern logic. If a variable is a continuous or semi continuous variable (like a year or a percentage), then the values are detailed as a range of values (for example, for the variable PMC, 1-25% means that the actual data values are between 1 and 25). In addition, a number of informational fields about each variable are included to assist the user in working with the data. These include: Variable Name: Alphanumeric name for the variable, limited to 7 characters in length. Variable Type: Numeric or character variable.

Release 1, September 2003 Page 1 of 2

Length: Variable length and number of decimal places.

Page 3: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Release 1, September 2003 Page 2 of 2

Start/End: Start and end columns in the ASCII data file. Question: Questionnaire item number and text. For variables corresponding directly to a

questionnaire item, the question number and text of the related questionnaire item is provided in the Question field. For constructed, survey administration, and weight and sampling variables, the Question field has a value of "N/A" to denote a non-questionnaire-related item.

Description: Brief description of the variable, primarily used with constructed or non-

questionnaire variables. In addition, this field describes the set of individuals eligible to be asked a question, regardless of whether they responded. Persons not included in the universe for a particular variable were assigned a value of "-1 Inapplicable".

Additional information on variable construction and editing, as well as specific information on selected variables is included in Chapter 5 of the User Guide. To obtain national estimates using this file, users should refer to the information on estimation included in Chapter 3 of the User Guide. In addition, Chapter 4 of the User Guide also provides information on deriving appropriate variance estimates.

Page 4: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Alphabetical Listing of Variables

ACC_CAP 216 217 PH3:F10:Accept new pats with Cap cntrcts

ACC_INT 100 101 PH3:D2:Access to Internet in office

ACQUIRD 72 73 PH3:C10:Practice acquired in last 2 yrs

ADQTIME 152 153 PH3:CV:Adequacy of time, all physicians

AWRGUID 111 112 PH3:D4A1:Aware of formal written guidels

AWRPROF 117 118 PH3:D4B1:Aware of practice profiling

AWRSURV 123 124 PH3:D4C1:Aware of patient satis surveys

BDCERT 27 28 PH3:CV:Board Certification Status

BIRTHX 11 12 PH3:AMA/AOA year of birth

BONUS 250 251 PH3:H4:Eligible for bonuses now flag

C5OWNX 67 68 PH3:CV:C5 Outside ownership

CARSAT 29 30 PH3:A19:Overall Career satisfaction

CHGREF 150 151 PH3:D13:Change-# referrals by PCPs

CLNFREE 154 155 PH3:F1C:Freedom for clinical decisions

CMPCHG 146 147 PH3:D11:Change-complexity at ref, NPCP

CMPEXPC 137 138 PH3:D8:Appropriateness w/o ref, PCP

CMPLVL 148 149 PH3:D12:Appropriateness at ref, NPCP

CMPPROV 135 136 PH3:D7:Change-complexity w/o ref, PCP

COMMALL 164 165 PH3:CV:Level of communication, all phys

COMPETE 278 279 PH3:H10c:Competitive situation of prac

COMPRM 162 163 PH3:F1G:Communicatn w primary care phys

CTL_BUS 84 85 PH3:C12D:Importnce of Control of bus dec

CTL_DEC 80 81 PH3:C12B:Importance of Control clin dec

CTL_INC 82 83 PH3:C12C:Importance of Potential income

CTL_WRK 78 79 PH3:C12A:Importance of Control of hours

EBONUS 266 267 PH3:H9a:Eligible for bonuses in 1999

EFEFF 51 52 PH3:B11:Effct of md info by pnts on efcy

EFGUIDE 109 110 PH3:D4A:Effect of formal writtn guidelin

EFINCNT 274 275 PH3:H10b1:Effect of financial incentives

EFINFO 49 50 PH3:B10:Effct of md info by pnts on qual

EFPROFL 115 116 PH3:D4B:Effect of practic profile result

EFSURV 121 122 PH3:D4C:Effect of patient satsfactn surv

FININCPT 276 277 PH3:CV:Effect of fin incentvs on pt care

FORMLRY 102 106 PH3:D3:Pct pats w prescrip cov-formulary

GENDER 9 10 PH3:AMA/AOA:Sex,1-Male,2-Female

Page 1 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 5: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Alphabetical Listing of Variables

GRADYRX 13 14 PH3:AMA/AOA year of graduation

GRTYPEX 63 64 PH3:CV:Type of group physician

HIGHCAR 156 157 PH3:F1D:Possibility of high quality care

HRFREEX 37 38 PH3:B6:Hours previous month charity care

HRSMEDX 33 34 PH3:CV:Hrs prev wk medically-related act

HRSPATX 35 36 PH3:CV:Hrs prev wk direct patient care

HSPHP 190 191 PH3:F8A_CB:H/Adm df:HPnetw/Adm barriers

HSPINS 192 193 PH3:F8A_CC:H/Adm df:Pt has inadqte ins

HSPPROV 188 189 PH3:F8A_CA:H/Adm df:Cant get qual provs

IMGUSPR 7 8 PH3:CV:Foreign Medical School Graduate

INCENT 270 271 PH3:H10b:Overall financial incentives

INCOMEX 268 269 PH3:H10:Net income in 1999

IT_FORM 88 89 PH3:D1B:Uses IT to obtain info on formls

IT_TRT 86 87 PH3:D1A:IT used get info on trtmnt alts

ITCLIN 96 97 PH3:D1F:IT used to exchange clin data

ITCOMM 98 99 PH3:D1G:Uses IT to comm w/pat cln issues

ITNOTES 92 93 PH3:D1D:Uses IT to access patient notes

ITPRESC 94 95 PH3:D1E:Uses IT to write prescriptions

ITRMNDR 90 91 PH3:D1C:IT used to generate reminders

MHHP 196 197 PH3:F8A_GB:O/Mnt dif:HPnetw/Adm barriers

MHINS 198 199 PH3:F8A_GC:O/Mnt dif:Pt has inadqte ins

MHPROV 194 195 PH3:F8A_GA:O/Mnt dif:Cant get qual prov

MULTPR 15 16 PH3:A4:Multiple practices

NEGINCN 158 159 PH3:F1E:Decision w/o neg financl incentv

NMCCONX 235 236 PH3:CV:Num of managed care contracts

NPHYSX 69 71 PH3:C7:Number of physicians at practice

NUMPRX 19 20 PH3:A4A:Number of practices

NWMCAID 204 205 PH3:F9B:Accept new Medicaid patients

NWMCARE 200 201 PH3:F9A:Accept new Medicare patients

NWNPAY 212 213 PH3:F9G:Accept new unins pats-cant pay

NWPRIV 208 209 PH3:F9C:Accept new privately insured

OBANCL 170 171 PH3:F8B:High quality ancillary services

OBHOSP 172 173 PH3:F8C:Non-emergency hospital admission

OBIMAG 176 177 PH3:F8E:High quality diagnostic imaging

OBINPAT 174 175 PH3:F8D:Adequate number inpatient days

Page 2 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 6: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Alphabetical Listing of Variables

OBMENTL 178 179 PH3:F8F:High qual inpat mental hlth care

OBOUTPT 180 181 PH3:F8G:High qual outpat mentl hlth care

OBREFS 168 169 PH3:F8A:Referrals to quality specialists

OTHPAR 65 66 PH3:C4:Owner: Other phys in practice

OWNPR 53 54 PH3:C1:Ownershp status(Full/Part/No Own)

OWNPURX 76 77 PH3:C11:Resp ownrshp when practc purchsd

PATACT 44 48 PH3:B9:Pct of pats:tests sugg by patints

PATINFO 39 43 PH3:B7:Pct of pats talk about other info

PATREL 166 167 PH3:F1H:Continuing patient relationships

PCAPREV 230 232 PH3:CV:% practice rev prepaid, capitated

PCPFLAG 23 24 PH3:CV:Primary care physician flag

PCTGATE 141 143 PH3:D10:Pct patients for whom gatekeeper

PCTINCX 264 265 PH3:H9:Pct income from bonuses

PHYSIDX 1 6 PH3: Physician id number, masked

PMC 237 241 PH3:CV:% practice rev from managed care

PMCAID 225 227 PH3:G1B:Pct payments from Medicaid

PMCARE 220 222 PH3:G1A:Pct payments from Medicare

PRCTYPE 61 62 PH3:CV:Practice type (Categorical)

QU_FRMY 127 128 PH3:D5B:Qual of care: Presc drug formlrs

QUGUIDE 129 130 PH3:D5C:Eff of formal g/lins on eff/qual

QUPROF 131 132 PH3:D5D:Eff of prac prfing on effcy/qual

QUSURV 133 134 PH3:D5E:Eff of pat sat surv on eff/qual

RACEX 280 281 PH3:H12:Race

RADJ 260 261 PH3:CV:Profiles are risk adjusted

REFHP 184 185 PH3:F8A_AB:Ref diff:HPnetw/Adm barriers

REFINS 186 187 PH3:F8A_AC:Ref diff:Pt has inadqte ins

REFPROV 182 183 PH3:F8A_AA:Ref diff:Cant get qual provs

SALADJ 248 249 PH3:H3:Salary adjustments

SALPAID 244 245 PH3:H1:Salaried Physician flag

SALTIME 246 247 PH3:H2:Compensate per work time period

SPECUSE 139 140 PH3:D9:Chng-num of refrls to speclsts

SPECX 25 26 PH1:CV:Combined Spec/Subspec

SPROD 252 253 PH3:CV:Own Productivity affects comp

SPROF 258 259 PH3:CV:Profiling results affect comp

SQUAL 256 257 PH3:CV:Quality measures affect comp

Page 3 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 7: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Alphabetical Listing of Variables

SSAT 254 255 PH3:CV:Patient satisfactn affects comp

TOPEMPX 59 60 PH3:CV:Employer type (all employees)

TOPOWNX 57 58 PH3:CV:Practice type (all owners)

USESPCS 160 161 PH3:F1F:High communcatn levl w/ speclsts

WKSWRKX 31 32 PH3:B1:Weeks practicing medicine in 1999

WTPHY4 282 291 PH3:CV:National weight, combined sample

YRBGNX 21 22 PH3:A6:Year began practicing medicine

_ACC_CAP 218 219 PH3:Imputation flag for ACC_CAP

_ACQUIRD 74 75 PH3:Imputation flag for ACQUIRD

_AWRGUID 113 114 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRGUID

_AWRPROF 119 120 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRPROF

_AWRSURV 125 126 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRSURV

_FORMLRY 107 108 PH3:Imputation flag for FORMLRY

_INCENT 272 273 PH3:Imputation flag for INCENT

_MULTPR 17 18 PH3:Imputation flag for MULTPR

_NWMCAID 206 207 PH3:Imputation flag for NWMCAID

_NWMCARE 202 203 PH3:Imputation flag for NWMCARE

_NWNPAY 214 215 PH3:Imputation flag for NWNPAY

_NWPRIV 210 211 PH3:Imputation flag for NWPRIV

_OWNPR 55 56 PH3:Imputation flag for OWNPR

_PCAPREV 233 234 PH3:Imputation flag for PCAPREV

_PCTGATE 144 145 PH3:Imputation flag for PCTGATE

_PMC 242 243 PH3:Imputation flag for PMC

_PMCAID 228 229 PH3:Imputation flag for PMCAID

_PMCARE 223 224 PH3:Imputation flag for PMCARE

_RADJ 262 263 PH3:Imputation flag for RADJ

Page 4 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 8: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Positional Listing of Variables

PHYSIDX 1 6 PH3: Physician id number, masked

IMGUSPR 7 8 PH3:CV:Foreign Medical School Graduate

GENDER 9 10 PH3:AMA/AOA:Sex,1-Male,2-Female

BIRTHX 11 12 PH3:AMA/AOA year of birth

GRADYRX 13 14 PH3:AMA/AOA year of graduation

MULTPR 15 16 PH3:A4:Multiple practices

_MULTPR 17 18 PH3:Imputation flag for MULTPR

NUMPRX 19 20 PH3:A4A:Number of practices

YRBGNX 21 22 PH3:A6:Year began practicing medicine

PCPFLAG 23 24 PH3:CV:Primary care physician flag

SPECX 25 26 PH1:CV:Combined Spec/Subspec

BDCERT 27 28 PH3:CV:Board Certification Status

CARSAT 29 30 PH3:A19:Overall Career satisfaction

WKSWRKX 31 32 PH3:B1:Weeks practicing medicine in 1999

HRSMEDX 33 34 PH3:CV:Hrs prev wk medically-related act

HRSPATX 35 36 PH3:CV:Hrs prev wk direct patient care

HRFREEX 37 38 PH3:B6:Hours previous month charity care

PATINFO 39 43 PH3:B7:Pct of pats talk about other info

PATACT 44 48 PH3:B9:Pct of pats:tests sugg by patints

EFINFO 49 50 PH3:B10:Effct of md info by pnts on qual

EFEFF 51 52 PH3:B11:Effct of md info by pnts on efcy

OWNPR 53 54 PH3:C1:Ownershp status(Full/Part/No Own)

_OWNPR 55 56 PH3:Imputation flag for OWNPR

TOPOWNX 57 58 PH3:CV:Practice type (all owners)

TOPEMPX 59 60 PH3:CV:Employer type (all employees)

PRCTYPE 61 62 PH3:CV:Practice type (Categorical)

GRTYPEX 63 64 PH3:CV:Type of group physician

OTHPAR 65 66 PH3:C4:Owner: Other phys in practice

C5OWNX 67 68 PH3:CV:C5 Outside ownership

NPHYSX 69 71 PH3:C7:Number of physicians at practice

ACQUIRD 72 73 PH3:C10:Practice acquired in last 2 yrs

_ACQUIRD 74 75 PH3:Imputation flag for ACQUIRD

OWNPURX 76 77 PH3:C11:Resp ownrshp when practc purchsd

CTL_WRK 78 79 PH3:C12A:Importance of Control of hours

CTL_DEC 80 81 PH3:C12B:Importance of Control clin dec

Page 1 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 9: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Positional Listing of Variables

CTL_INC 82 83 PH3:C12C:Importance of Potential income

CTL_BUS 84 85 PH3:C12D:Importnce of Control of bus dec

IT_TRT 86 87 PH3:D1A:IT used get info on trtmnt alts

IT_FORM 88 89 PH3:D1B:Uses IT to obtain info on formls

ITRMNDR 90 91 PH3:D1C:IT used to generate reminders

ITNOTES 92 93 PH3:D1D:Uses IT to access patient notes

ITPRESC 94 95 PH3:D1E:Uses IT to write prescriptions

ITCLIN 96 97 PH3:D1F:IT used to exchange clin data

ITCOMM 98 99 PH3:D1G:Uses IT to comm w/pat cln issues

ACC_INT 100 101 PH3:D2:Access to Internet in office

FORMLRY 102 106 PH3:D3:Pct pats w prescrip cov-formulary

_FORMLRY 107 108 PH3:Imputation flag for FORMLRY

EFGUIDE 109 110 PH3:D4A:Effect of formal writtn guidelin

AWRGUID 111 112 PH3:D4A1:Aware of formal written guidels

_AWRGUID 113 114 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRGUID

EFPROFL 115 116 PH3:D4B:Effect of practic profile result

AWRPROF 117 118 PH3:D4B1:Aware of practice profiling

_AWRPROF 119 120 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRPROF

EFSURV 121 122 PH3:D4C:Effect of patient satsfactn surv

AWRSURV 123 124 PH3:D4C1:Aware of patient satis surveys

_AWRSURV 125 126 PH3:Imputation flag for AWRSURV

QU_FRMY 127 128 PH3:D5B:Qual of care: Presc drug formlrs

QUGUIDE 129 130 PH3:D5C:Eff of formal g/lins on eff/qual

QUPROF 131 132 PH3:D5D:Eff of prac prfing on effcy/qual

QUSURV 133 134 PH3:D5E:Eff of pat sat surv on eff/qual

CMPPROV 135 136 PH3:D7:Change-complexity w/o ref, PCP

CMPEXPC 137 138 PH3:D8:Appropriateness w/o ref, PCP

SPECUSE 139 140 PH3:D9:Chng-num of refrls to speclsts

PCTGATE 141 143 PH3:D10:Pct patients for whom gatekeeper

_PCTGATE 144 145 PH3:Imputation flag for PCTGATE

CMPCHG 146 147 PH3:D11:Change-complexity at ref, NPCP

CMPLVL 148 149 PH3:D12:Appropriateness at ref, NPCP

CHGREF 150 151 PH3:D13:Change-# referrals by PCPs

ADQTIME 152 153 PH3:CV:Adequacy of time, all physicians

CLNFREE 154 155 PH3:F1C:Freedom for clinical decisions

Page 2 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 10: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Positional Listing of Variables

HIGHCAR 156 157 PH3:F1D:Possibility of high quality care

NEGINCN 158 159 PH3:F1E:Decision w/o neg financl incentv

USESPCS 160 161 PH3:F1F:High communcatn levl w/ speclsts

COMPRM 162 163 PH3:F1G:Communicatn w primary care phys

COMMALL 164 165 PH3:CV:Level of communication, all phys

PATREL 166 167 PH3:F1H:Continuing patient relationships

OBREFS 168 169 PH3:F8A:Referrals to quality specialists

OBANCL 170 171 PH3:F8B:High quality ancillary services

OBHOSP 172 173 PH3:F8C:Non-emergency hospital admission

OBINPAT 174 175 PH3:F8D:Adequate number inpatient days

OBIMAG 176 177 PH3:F8E:High quality diagnostic imaging

OBMENTL 178 179 PH3:F8F:High qual inpat mental hlth care

OBOUTPT 180 181 PH3:F8G:High qual outpat mentl hlth care

REFPROV 182 183 PH3:F8A_AA:Ref diff:Cant get qual provs

REFHP 184 185 PH3:F8A_AB:Ref diff:HPnetw/Adm barriers

REFINS 186 187 PH3:F8A_AC:Ref diff:Pt has inadqte ins

HSPPROV 188 189 PH3:F8A_CA:H/Adm df:Cant get qual provs

HSPHP 190 191 PH3:F8A_CB:H/Adm df:HPnetw/Adm barriers

HSPINS 192 193 PH3:F8A_CC:H/Adm df:Pt has inadqte ins

MHPROV 194 195 PH3:F8A_GA:O/Mnt dif:Cant get qual prov

MHHP 196 197 PH3:F8A_GB:O/Mnt dif:HPnetw/Adm barriers

MHINS 198 199 PH3:F8A_GC:O/Mnt dif:Pt has inadqte ins

NWMCARE 200 201 PH3:F9A:Accept new Medicare patients

_NWMCARE 202 203 PH3:Imputation flag for NWMCARE

NWMCAID 204 205 PH3:F9B:Accept new Medicaid patients

_NWMCAID 206 207 PH3:Imputation flag for NWMCAID

NWPRIV 208 209 PH3:F9C:Accept new privately insured

_NWPRIV 210 211 PH3:Imputation flag for NWPRIV

NWNPAY 212 213 PH3:F9G:Accept new unins pats-cant pay

_NWNPAY 214 215 PH3:Imputation flag for NWNPAY

ACC_CAP 216 217 PH3:F10:Accept new pats with Cap cntrcts

_ACC_CAP 218 219 PH3:Imputation flag for ACC_CAP

PMCARE 220 222 PH3:G1A:Pct payments from Medicare

_PMCARE 223 224 PH3:Imputation flag for PMCARE

PMCAID 225 227 PH3:G1B:Pct payments from Medicaid

Page 3 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 11: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

Variable Start End Description

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Positional Listing of Variables

_PMCAID 228 229 PH3:Imputation flag for PMCAID

PCAPREV 230 232 PH3:CV:% practice rev prepaid, capitated

_PCAPREV 233 234 PH3:Imputation flag for PCAPREV

NMCCONX 235 236 PH3:CV:Num of managed care contracts

PMC 237 241 PH3:CV:% practice rev from managed care

_PMC 242 243 PH3:Imputation flag for PMC

SALPAID 244 245 PH3:H1:Salaried Physician flag

SALTIME 246 247 PH3:H2:Compensate per work time period

SALADJ 248 249 PH3:H3:Salary adjustments

BONUS 250 251 PH3:H4:Eligible for bonuses now flag

SPROD 252 253 PH3:CV:Own Productivity affects comp

SSAT 254 255 PH3:CV:Patient satisfactn affects comp

SQUAL 256 257 PH3:CV:Quality measures affect comp

SPROF 258 259 PH3:CV:Profiling results affect comp

RADJ 260 261 PH3:CV:Profiles are risk adjusted

_RADJ 262 263 PH3:Imputation flag for RADJ

PCTINCX 264 265 PH3:H9:Pct income from bonuses

EBONUS 266 267 PH3:H9a:Eligible for bonuses in 1999

INCOMEX 268 269 PH3:H10:Net income in 1999

INCENT 270 271 PH3:H10b:Overall financial incentives

_INCENT 272 273 PH3:Imputation flag for INCENT

EFINCNT 274 275 PH3:H10b1:Effect of financial incentives

FININCPT 276 277 PH3:CV:Effect of fin incentvs on pt care

COMPETE 278 279 PH3:H10c:Competitive situation of prac

RACEX 280 281 PH3:H12:Race

WTPHY4 282 291 PH3:CV:National weight, combined sample

Page 4 of 4Release 1, September 2003

Page 12: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Survey Administration Variables

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PHYSIDX Numeric 6.0 1 6

Unique identifier for each physician.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,406 100.0300001-312406 12,406 100.0

IMGUSPR Numeric 2.0 7 8

This flag variable has a value of 1 for foreign medical graduates (i.e., those graduating from medical schools outside the U.S. or Puerto Rico). This information was obtained from the sample frame files coming from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA).

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent9,799 79.00: U.S.,PR 9,799 79.0

2,607 21.01: OTHER 12,406 100.0

GENDER Numeric 2.0 9 10

Gender. This information was obtained from the sample frame files coming from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Osteopathic Association (AOA).Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent9,131 73.61: Male 9,131 73.6

3,275 26.42: Female 12,406 100.0

Page 1 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 13: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Survey Administration Variables

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

BIRTHX Numeric 2.0 11 12

Year of birth. For confidentiality reasons, years before 1936 were bottom coded (BIRTHX=1), and years after 1965 were top coded (BIRTHX=8) . For confidentiality reasons, this is a categorical variable which groups years together into approximate 5 year intervals.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent819 6.61: 1935 or earlier (bottom code) 819 6.6

695 5.62: 1936-1940 1,514 12.2

1,069 8.63: 1941-1945 2,583 20.8

1,844 14.94: 1946-1950 4,427 35.7

2,411 19.45: 1951-1955 6,838 55.1

2,312 18.66: 1956-1960 9,150 73.8

1,964 15.87: 1961-1965 11,114 89.6

1,292 10.48: 1966 or later (top code) 12,406 100.0

GRADYRX Numeric 2.0 13 14

Year physician graduated from medical school. For confidentiality reasons, years before 1961 were bottom coded (GRADYRX=1), and years after 1995 were top coded (GRADYRX=9). For confidentiality reasons, this is a categorical variable which groups years together into approximate 5 year intervals.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent644 5.21: 1960 or earlier (bottom code) 644 5.2

657 5.32: 1961-1965 1,301 10.5

853 6.93: 1966-1970 2,154 17.4

1,349 10.94: 1971-1975 3,503 28.2

1,989 16.05: 1976-1980 5,492 44.3

2,338 18.86: 1981-1985 7,830 63.1

2,230 18.07: 1986-1990 10,060 81.1

2,037 16.48: 1991-1995 12,097 97.5

309 2.59: 1996 or later (top code) 12,406 100.0

Page 2 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 14: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section A - Introduction

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

MULTPR Numeric 2.0 15 16

Do you currently provide patient care in one practice, or more than one practice? We consider multiple sites or offices associated with the same organization to be only one practice.

Question: A4

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent11,248 90.71: One 11,248 90.7

1,158 9.32: More than one 12,406 100.0

_MULTPR Numeric 2.0 17 18

Imputation flag for variable MULTPR.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,404 100.00: No Imputation 12,404 100.0

2 0.01: Imputation 12,406 100.0

NUMPRX Numeric 2.0 19 20

This question was only asked of respondents with a response of "more than one" to question A4 (MULTPR=2). The variable was top coded at 3 for confidentiality reasons.Description:In how many different practices do you provide patient care?Question: A4A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent903 7.32: Two practices 903 7.3

249 2.03: Three or more practices 1,152 9.3

1 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 1,153 9.3

4 0.0-8: Don't Know 1,157 9.3

1 0.0-7: Refused 1,158 9.3

11,248 90.7-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 3 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 15: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section A - Introduction

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

YRBGNX Numeric 2.0 21 22

Year physician started practicing medicine. Some values are logically imputed. If the graduation year was known, but the year of starting practice was not known, then YRBGN was set equal to graduation year +3 for primary care physicians and graduation year +5 for specialists. If the graduation year was not known, then YRBGN was set to birth year + 30 for primary care physicians and to birth year +32 for specialists. For confidentiality reasons, years before 1961 were bottom coded (YRBGNX=1), and years after 1995 were top coded (YRBGNX=9). For confidentiality reasons, this is a categorical variable which groups years together into approximate 5 year intervals.

Description:

In what year did you begin medical practice after completing your undergraduate and graduate medical training?

Question: A6

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent308 2.51: 1960 or earlier (bottom code) 308 2.5

341 2.72: 1961-1965 649 5.2

466 3.83: 1966-1970 1,115 9.0

943 7.64: 1971-1975 2,058 16.6

1,546 12.55: 1976-1980 3,604 29.1

1,950 15.76: 1981-1985 5,554 44.8

2,131 17.27: 1986-1990 7,685 61.9

2,263 18.28: 1991-1995 9,948 80.2

2,458 19.89: 1996 or later (top code) 12,406 100.0

PCPFLAG Numeric 2.0 23 24

A flag indicating that the physician spends most of his/her patient care time in a primary care specialty. The definition of primary care physician (PCP) is based on the response to questions A8, A9, A9a, A9b, and A10.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,733 38.20: Not PCP 4,733 38.2

7,673 61.81: PCP 12,406 100.0

Page 4 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 16: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section A - Introduction

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

SPECX Numeric 2.0 25 26

Physician's specialty based on responses to questions A8 and A10 and grouped into seven types of specialties. Ob/Gyn and Psychiatrists are separated out because these types of physicians were asked specific questions in the survey.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,542 20.51: Internal Medicine 2,542 20.5

3,273 26.42: Family/General Practice 5,815 46.9

1,802 14.53: Pediatrics 7,617 61.4

2,402 19.44: Medical Specialties 10,019 80.8

1,407 11.35: Surgical Specialties 11,426 92.1

534 4.36: Psychiatry 11,960 96.4

446 3.67: ObGyn 12,406 100.0

BDCERT Numeric 2.0 27 28

Board certification status of physician. This variable summarizes the certification/eligiblity status of the physician in any specialty or subspecialty. It was constructed from the responses to questions A11, A13, A15, and A17.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,838 87.41: Board certified 10,838 87.4

1,131 9.12: Board eligible only 11,969 96.5

395 3.23: Neither 12,364 99.7

42 0.3-9: Not Ascertained 12,406 100.0

Page 5 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 17: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section A - Introduction

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

CARSAT Numeric 2.0 29 30

Many of the remaining questions are about your practice and your relationships with patients. Before we begin those questions, let me ask you: Thinking very generally about your satisfaction with your overall career in medicine, would you say that you are CURRENTLY: Very satisfied, Somewhat satisfied, Somewhat dissatisfied, Very dissatisfied, Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Question: A19

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,964 40.05: Very satisfied 4,964 40.0

5,100 41.14: Somewhat satisfied 10,064 81.1

1,661 13.43: Somewhat dissatisfied 11,725 94.5

458 3.72: Very dissatisfied 12,183 98.2

199 1.61: Neither satisfd/dissatisfd 12,382 99.8

17 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,399 99.9

7 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 6 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 18: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section B - Utilization of Time

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

WKSWRKX Numeric 2.0 31 32

The variable was bottom coded at 40 weeks.Description:

Considering all of your practices, approximately how many weeks did you practice medicine during 1999? Exclude time missed due to vacation, illness and other absences. Exclude family leave, military service, and professional conferences. If your office is closed for several weeks of the year, those weeks should NOT be counted as weeks worked.

Question: B1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent736 5.940 (bottom code) 736 5.9

11,670 94.141-52 12,406 100.0

HRSMEDX Numeric 2.0 33 34

Number of hours physician spent in medically related activities during last complete week of work. Constructed from response to questions B2, B3c, and B4. If the reported number of hours in the previous week spent in direct patient care was greater than the reported number of hours spent in medically related activities, then HRSMEDX was imputed. This variable was top coded at 81 hours.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,688 13.61-39 1,688 13.6

2,688 21.740-49 4,376 35.3

3,250 26.250-59 7,626 61.5

4,345 35.060-80 11,971 96.5

435 3.581 (top code) 12,406 100.0

Page 7 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 19: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section B - Utilization of Time

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

HRSPATX Numeric 2.0 35 36

Number of hours physician spent in direct patient care activities during last complete week of work. Constructed from responses to questions B3, B3d, and B5. This variable was top coded at 71 hours.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1 0.00 1 0.0

1,361 11.01-29 1,362 11.0

2,383 19.230-39 3,745 30.2

3,694 29.840-49 7,439 60.0

2,621 21.150-59 10,060 81.1

1,741 14.060-70 11,801 95.1

605 4.971 (top code) 12,406 100.0

HRFREEX Numeric 2.0 37 38

This variable was top coded at 41 hours.Description:

Again thinking of all your practices, during the LAST MONTH, how many hours, if any, did you spend providing CHARITY care?

Question: B6

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,781 30.50 3,781 30.5

3,707 29.91-4 7,488 60.4

2,043 16.55-9 9,531 76.8

2,554 20.610-40 12,085 97.4

321 2.641 (top code) 12,406 100.0

Page 8 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 20: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section B - Utilization of Time

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PATINFO Numeric 5.1 39 43

The response "Less than 1%" was coded as 0.5.Description:

During the last month, what percentage of your patients talked about medical conditions, tests, treatments, or drugs they had read or heard about from various sources other than you, such as the Internet, their friends or relatives, TV, radio, books, or magazines?

Question: B7

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent386 3.1None 386 3.1

196 1.6.5,Less than 1% 582 4.7

11,713 94.41-100% 12,295 99.1

106 0.9-8: Don't Know 12,401 100.0

5 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

PATACT Numeric 5.1 44 48

The response "Less than 1%" was coded as 0.5.Description:

During the last month, for what percentage of your patients did you order tests, procedures, or prescriptions SUGGESTED BY PATIENTS that you would not otherwise have ordered?

Question: B9

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,868 31.2None 3,868 31.2

722 5.8.5,Less than 1% 4,590 37.0

7,769 62.61-100% 12,359 99.6

42 0.3-8: Don't Know 12,401 100.0

5 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 9 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 21: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section B - Utilization of Time

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

EFINFO Numeric 2.0 49 50

The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know".Description:

On balance, what do you think is the effect of medical information obtained by your patients from sources other than you on your ability to provide HIGH QUALITY CARE? Would you say it is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: B10

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,607 45.23: Positive 5,607 45.2

4,201 33.92: Neither 9,808 79.1

1,916 15.41: Negative 11,724 94.5

142 1.1-8: Don't Know 11,866 95.6

6 0.0-7: Refused 11,872 95.7

534 4.3-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

EFEFF Numeric 2.0 51 52

The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know".Description:

On balance, what do you think is the effect of medical information obtained by your patients from sources other than you on your EFFICIENCY? Would you say it is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: B11

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,280 26.43: Positive 3,280 26.4

5,153 41.52: Neither 8,433 68.0

3,796 30.61: Negative 12,229 98.6

164 1.3-8: Don't Know 12,393 99.9

13 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 10 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 22: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

OWNPR Numeric 2.0 53 54

Are you a full owner, a part owner, or not an owner of this practice?Question: C1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,747 30.21: Full owner 3,747 30.2

2,773 22.42: Part owner 6,520 52.6

5,886 47.43: Not an owner 12,406 100.0

_OWNPR Numeric 2.0 55 56

Imputation flag for OWNPR.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,388 99.90: No Imputation 12,388 99.9

18 0.11: Imputation 12,406 100.0

TOPOWNX Numeric 2.0 57 58

Type of practice for physicians who are full or part owners of practice (OWNPR = 1 or 2). Constructed from responses to questions C2 and C9. The category "1:Other" includes: integrated health, free-standing clinic, physician practice management, management services organization(mso), physician-hospital organization(pho), locum tenens, independent contractor, and owner physicians who don't fall into any of the other categories. For confidentiality reasons, solo and 2 physician practice types were combined into one category (6) and group model HMO and staff model HMO were combined into one category (9).

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent104 0.81: Other 104 0.8

3,728 30.06: Solo/2 phys practice 3,832 30.9

2,525 20.48: Group practice with 3+ physicians 6,357 51.2

161 1.39: Group/Staff model HMO 6,518 52.5

1 0.0-8: Don't Know 6,519 52.5

1 0.0-7: Refused 6,520 52.6

5,886 47.4-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 11 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 23: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

TOPEMPX Numeric 2.0 59 60

For physicians who are not full or part owners, indicates type of employer. Constructed from responses to questions C3, C3b, C9. For confidentiality reasons, solo and 2 physician practice types were combined into one category (6) and group model HMO and staff model HMO were combined into one category (9).

Description:Question: C3

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,394 11.21: Other 1,394 11.2

564 4.56: Solo/2 phys practice 1,958 15.8

1,068 8.68: Group practice with 3+ physicians 3,026 24.4

390 3.19: Group/Staff model HMO 3,416 27.5

970 7.812: Medical school/univ 4,386 35.4

1,494 12.013: Non-govt hospital 5,880 47.4

3 0.0-8: Don't Know 5,883 47.4

3 0.0-7: Refused 5,886 47.4

6,520 52.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

PRCTYPE Numeric 2.0 61 62

Physician's practice type is categorized into one of six classifications. Constructed from responses to questions C2, C3, C3a, C3b, C3c, C3d and C9.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,292 34.61: Solo/2 Physcn 4,292 34.6

3,593 29.02: Group >= 3 Physcn 7,885 63.6

551 4.43: HMO 8,436 68.0

970 7.84: Medical School 9,406 75.8

1,660 13.45: Hospital Based 11,066 89.2

1,340 10.86: Other 12,406 100.0

Page 12 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 24: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

GRTYPEX Numeric 2.0 63 64

Constructed variable which indicates the type of physicians working in the group practice or free standing clinic. Constructed from constructed variable PCPFLAG, and responses to questions C2a, C2b, C2c, C3aa, C3ab, C3ac, C3ca, C3cb, C3cc. Applies to physicians working in a group practice of 3 or more physicians.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,281 18.41: Single spclty 2,281 18.4

1,248 10.12: Multi-spclty 3,529 28.4

64 0.5-9: Not Ascertained 3,593 29.0

8,813 71.0-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

OTHPAR Numeric 2.0 65 66

Indicates whether one or more of the other physicians in the practice have an ownership interest. The respondents to this question exclude full owners of solo practices, physicians working in a practice owned by one physician, and physicians working in institutions such as medical schools, universities, hospitals, state or local governments, or other situations, including an Integrated delivery system (IDS), Physician practice management company (PPM), Management services organization (MSO), Physician hospital organization (PHO), or locum tenens.

Description:

Do one or more of the other physicians in the practice in which you work have an ownership interest?

Question: C4

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent895 7.20: No 895 7.2

3,998 32.21: Yes 4,893 39.4

21 0.2-8: Don't Know 4,914 39.6

4 0.0-7: Refused 4,918 39.6

7,488 60.4-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 13 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 25: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

C5OWNX Numeric 2.0 67 68

Indicates whether there are outside owners of practice (i.e., excluding respondent and physician's own group practice). Constructed from responses to C5A, C5B, C5C, C5D. The respondents to this question exclude full owners of solo practices, and physicians working in institutions such as medical schools, universities, hospitals, state or local governments, or other situations, including IDS, PPM, MSO, PHO, or locum tenens.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,359 35.10: None 4,359 35.1

898 7.21: Outside owner 5,257 42.4

70 0.6-9: Not Ascertained 5,327 42.9

7,079 57.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

NPHYSX Numeric 3.0 69 71

Not asked of physicians working in medical schools, universities, hospitals, state or local governments, or other situations such as IDS, PPM, MSO, PHO, or locum tenens. For confidentiality reasons, this variable was top coded at 200 physicians.

Description:

How many physicians, including yourself, are in the practice? Please include all locations of the practice. If asked, this includes both full- and part-time physicians

Question: C7

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,813 22.71 2,813 22.7

2,083 16.82-3 4,896 39.5

2,985 24.14-10 7,881 63.5

1,955 15.811-199 9,836 79.3

500 4.0200 (top code) 10,336 83.3

21 0.2-8: Don't Know 10,357 83.5

2,049 16.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

ACQUIRD Numeric 2.0 72 73

In the last two years, were you part of a practice that was purchased by another practice or organization? We are only interested in purchases over the last two years that occurred while you were part of the practice.

Question: C10

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent11,420 92.10: No 11,420 92.1

986 7.91: Yes 12,406 100.0

Page 14 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 26: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_ACQUIRD Numeric 2.0 74 75

Imputation flag for ACQUIRD.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,374 99.70: No Imputation 12,374 99.7

32 0.31: Imputation 12,406 100.0

OWNPURX Numeric 2.0 76 77

Applies to those physicians whose practice was purchased in the past two years (C10, ACQUIRD=1). For confidentiality reasons, full owner and part owner were combined into one category.

Description:

At the time of the purchase, were you a full owner, a part owner, or not an owner of the practice that was purchased?

Question: C11

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent324 2.61: Full/Part Owner 324 2.6

658 5.33: Not an owner 982 7.9

2 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 984 7.9

1 0.0-8: Don't Know 985 7.9

1 0.0-7: Refused 986 7.9

11,420 92.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

CTL_WRK Numeric 2.0 78 79

Next, I am going to list several aspects of a medical practice. Using any number from one to ten, where "1" is not important, and "10" is very important, tell me how important each one is to you. How important is control over your working hours?

Question: C12a

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,823 46.910: Very important 5,823 46.9

6,516 52.52-9 12,339 99.5

54 0.41: Not important 12,393 99.9

9 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,402 100.0

4 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 15 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 27: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section C - Type and Size of Practice

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

CTL_DEC Numeric 2.0 80 81

Next, I am going to list several aspects of a medical practice. Using any number from one to ten, where "1" is not important, and "10" is very important, tell me how important each one is to you. How important is control over your clinical decisions?

Question: C12b

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent9,202 74.210: Very important 9,202 74.2

3,166 25.52-9 12,368 99.7

28 0.21: Not important 12,396 99.9

9 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,405 100.0

1 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

CTL_INC Numeric 2.0 82 83

Next, I am going to list several aspects of a medical practice. Using any number from one to ten, where "1" is not important, and "10" is very important, tell me how important each one is to you. How important is your potential income?

Question: C12c

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,691 29.810: Very important 3,691 29.8

8,624 69.52-9 12,315 99.3

62 0.51: Not important 12,377 99.8

20 0.2-8: Don't Know 12,397 99.9

9 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

CTL_BUS Numeric 2.0 84 85

Next, I am going to list several aspects of a medical practice. Using any number from one to ten, where "1" is not important, and "10" is very important, tell me how important each one is to you. How important is control over your practice's business decisions?

Question: C12d

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,170 33.610: Very important 4,170 33.6

7,960 64.22-9 12,130 97.8

231 1.91: Not important 12,361 99.6

34 0.3-8: Don't Know 12,395 99.9

11 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 16 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 28: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

IT_TRT Numeric 2.0 86 87

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to obtain information about treatment alternatives or recommended guidelines?

Question: D1a

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,922 47.70: No 5,922 47.7

6,469 52.11: Yes 12,391 99.9

12 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,403 100.0

3 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

IT_FORM Numeric 2.0 88 89

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to obtain information on formularies?

Question: D1b

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent8,661 69.80: No 8,661 69.8

3,713 29.91: Yes 12,374 99.7

30 0.2-8: Don't Know 12,404 100.0

2 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

ITRMNDR Numeric 2.0 90 91

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to generate reminders for you about preventive services.?

Question: D1c

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent9,337 75.30: No 9,337 75.3

3,034 24.51: Yes 12,371 99.7

33 0.3-8: Don't Know 12,404 100.0

2 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 17 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 29: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

ITNOTES Numeric 2.0 92 93

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to access patient notes, medication lists, or problem lists?

Question: D1d

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent8,158 65.80: No 8,158 65.8

4,240 34.21: Yes 12,398 99.9

6 0.0-8: Don't Know 12,404 100.0

2 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

ITPRESC Numeric 2.0 94 95

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to write prescriptions?

Question: D1e

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,931 88.10: No 10,931 88.1

1,464 11.81: Yes 12,395 99.9

8 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,403 100.0

3 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

ITCLIN Numeric 2.0 96 97

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used for clinical data and image exchanges with other physicians?

Question: D1f

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent7,613 61.40: No 7,613 61.4

4,777 38.51: Yes 12,390 99.9

13 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,403 100.0

3 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 18 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 30: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

ITCOMM Numeric 2.0 98 99

In your (main) practice, are computers or other forms of information technology used to communicate about clinical issues with patients by e-mail?

Question: D1g

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent9,947 80.20: No 9,947 80.2

2,444 19.71: Yes 12,391 99.9

11 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,402 100.0

4 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

ACC_INT Numeric 2.0 100 101

Patient care includes face-to-face contact with patients, as well as patient record keeping and office work, travel time connected with seeing patients, and communication with other physicians, hospitals, pharmacies, and other places on a patient's behalf.

Description:Do you have access to the Internet at the place where you provide most of your patient care?Question: D2

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,049 24.60: No 3,049 24.6

9,323 75.11: Yes 12,372 99.7

33 0.3-8: Don't Know 12,405 100.0

1 0.0-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

FORMLRY Numeric 5.1 102 106

The response "Less than 1%" was coded as 0.5.Description:

Next, what percentage of your patients have prescription coverage that includes the use of a formulary?

Question: D3

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent229 1.8None 229 1.8

17 0.1.5,Less than 1% 246 2.0

12,160 98.01-100 12,406 100.0

Page 19 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 31: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_FORMLRY Numeric 2.0 107 108

Imputation flag for FORMLRYDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent11,286 91.00: No Imputation 11,286 91.0

1,120 9.01: Imputation 12,406 100.0

EFGUIDE Numeric 2.0 109 110

In this question, we are only interested in the use of formal written guidelines such as those generated by physician organizations, insurance companies or HMOs, or other such groups.

Description:

How large an effect does your use of FORMAL, WRITTEN practice guidelines such as those generated by physician organizations, insurance companies or HMOs, or government agencies have on your practice of medicine?

Question: D4a

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent576 4.65: Very large 576 4.6

2,215 17.94: Large 2,791 22.5

4,238 34.23: Moderate 7,029 56.7

2,898 23.42: Small 9,927 80.0

1,396 11.31: Very small 11,323 91.3

1,047 8.40: No effect 12,370 99.7

26 0.2-8: Don't Know 12,396 99.9

10 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

AWRGUID Numeric 2.0 111 112

Asked of physicians who responded "0:No effect" to question D4a.Description:

Is that because you are not aware of guidelines that pertain to conditions you typically treat, or because you are aware of them, but they have no effect on conditions you treat?

Question: D4a1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent147 1.21: Not aware 147 1.2

900 7.32: Aware, no effect 1,047 8.4

11,359 91.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 20 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 32: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_AWRGUID Numeric 2.0 113 114

Imputation flag for AWRGUIDDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent998 8.00: No Imputation 998 8.0

49 0.41: Imputation 1,047 8.4

11,359 91.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

EFPROFL Numeric 2.0 115 116

How large an effect do the results of practice profiles comparing your pattern of using medical resources to treat patients with that of other physicians have on your practice of medicine?

Question: D4b

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent202 1.65: Very large 202 1.6

1,037 8.44: Large 1,239 10.0

3,141 25.33: Moderate 4,380 35.3

3,344 27.02: Small 7,724 62.3

1,858 15.01: Very small 9,582 77.2

2,706 21.80: No effect 12,288 99.0

101 0.8-8: Don't Know 12,389 99.9

17 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

AWRPROF Numeric 2.0 117 118

A practice profile is a report that is usually computer generated, which compares you to other physicians on things like referrals to specialists, hospitalizations, or other measures of cost effectiveness. Asked of physicians who responded "0:No effect" to question D4b.

Description:

Is that because you are not aware of practice profiling, or you are aware of it, but it has no effect on your practice of medicine?

Question: D4b1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent801 6.51: Not aware 801 6.5

1,905 15.42: Aware, no effect 2,706 21.8

9,700 78.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 21 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 33: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_AWRPROF Numeric 2.0 119 120

Imputation flag for AWRPROFDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,605 21.00: No Imputation 2,605 21.0

101 0.81: Imputation 2,706 21.8

9,700 78.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

EFSURV Numeric 2.0 121 122

How large an effect does feedback from patient satisfaction surveys have on your practice of medicine?

Question: D4c

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent985 7.95: Very large 985 7.9

2,976 24.04: Large 3,961 31.9

3,623 29.23: Moderate 7,584 61.1

2,101 16.92: Small 9,685 78.1

968 7.81: Very small 10,653 85.9

1,670 13.50: No effect 12,323 99.3

74 0.6-8: Don't Know 12,397 99.9

9 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

AWRSURV Numeric 2.0 123 124

Asked of physicians who responded "0:No effect" to question D4c.Description:

Is that because patient satisfaction surveys are not used in your practice, or because they are used, but they have no effect on your practice of medicine?

Question: D4c1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,387 11.21: Not used 1,387 11.2

283 2.32: Used but no effect 1,670 13.5

10,736 86.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 22 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 34: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_AWRSURV Numeric 2.0 125 126

Imputation flag for AWRSURVDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,644 13.30: No Imputation 1,644 13.3

26 0.21: Imputation 1,670 13.5

10,736 86.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

QU_FRMY Numeric 2.0 127 128

Asked of physicians who responded 1-100 to question D3. This question was not asked of 1086 physicians whose values for D3 were imputed to have a value between 1-100. The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know". Physicians responding "not applicable" were combined in the category "-1: Inapplicable" with the physicians to whom the question did not apply.

Description:

On balance, would you say the effect of prescription drug formularies on your ability to provide efficient and high-quality care is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: D5b

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,511 12.23: Positive 1,511 12.2

3,924 31.62: Neither 5,435 43.8

5,583 45.01: Negative 11,018 88.8

36 0.3-8: Don't Know 11,054 89.1

2 0.0-7: Refused 11,056 89.1

1,350 10.9-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 23 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 35: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

QUGUIDE Numeric 2.0 129 130

Asked of physicians who responded Moderate(3), Large(4), or Very Large(5) to question D4a. The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know". Physicians responding "not applicable" were combined in the category "-1: Inapplicable" with the physicians to whom the question did not apply.

Description:

On balance, would you say the effect of practice guidelines on your ability to provide efficient and high-quality care is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: D5c

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,770 38.43: Positive 4,770 38.4

1,756 14.22: Neither 6,526 52.6

436 3.51: Negative 6,962 56.1

44 0.4-8: Don't Know 7,006 56.5

5 0.0-7: Refused 7,011 56.5

5,395 43.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

QUPROF Numeric 2.0 131 132

Asked of physicians who responded Moderate(3), Large(4), or Very Large(5) to question D4b. The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know". Physicians responding "not applicable" were combined in the category "-1: Inapplicable" with the physicians to whom the question did not apply.

Description:

On balance, would you say the effect of practice profiles on your ability to provide efficient and high-quality care is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: D5d

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,229 18.03: Positive 2,229 18.0

1,691 13.62: Neither 3,920 31.6

393 3.21: Negative 4,313 34.8

45 0.4-8: Don't Know 4,358 35.1

1 0.0-7: Refused 4,359 35.1

8,047 64.9-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 24 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 36: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

QUSURV Numeric 2.0 133 134

Asked of physicians who responded Moderate(3), Large(4), or Very Large(5) to question D4c. The response "Can't choose/Unsure" was combined with the response "Don't know". Physicians responding "not applicable" were combined in the category "-1: Inapplicable" with the physicians to whom the question did not apply.

Description:

On balance, would you say the effect of patient's satisfaction surveys on your ability to provide efficient and high-quality care is generally positive, generally negative, or neither?

Question: D5e

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,776 46.63: Positive 5,776 46.6

1,485 12.02: Neither 7,261 58.5

251 2.01: Negative 7,512 60.6

33 0.3-8: Don't Know 7,545 60.8

1 0.0-7: Refused 7,546 60.8

4,860 39.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

CMPPROV Numeric 2.0 135 136

Extent of change over past two years in complexity or severity of patients' conditions treated without referral to specialists. Respondents limited to those in one of the following specialties or subspecialties: Family Practice, Geriatric Medicine, General Practice, Geriatric Internal Medicine, Adolescent Medicine, Internal Medicine/Family Practice, or other specialist who spends most of his/her time in General Internal Medicine or General Pediatrics (PCP=1).

Description:

During the last 2 years, has the complexity or severity of patients' conditions for which you provide care without referral to specialists (read 5-1)?

Question: D7

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent854 6.95: Increased a lot 854 6.9

1,891 15.24: Increased a little 2,745 22.1

4,344 35.03: Stayed same 7,089 57.1

466 3.82: Decreased a little 7,555 60.9

89 0.71: Decreased a lot 7,644 61.6

25 0.2-8: Don't Know 7,669 61.8

4 0.0-7: Refused 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 25 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 37: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

CMPEXPC Numeric 2.0 137 138

Respondents limited to those in one of the following specialties or subspecialties: Family Practice, Geriatric Medicine, General Practice, Adolescent Medicine, or other specialist who spends most of his/her time in General Internal Medicine or General Pediatrics (PCP=1).

Description:

In general, would you say that the complexity or severity of patients' conditions for which you are currently expected to provide care without referral is (read 5-1)?

Question: D8

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent341 2.75: Much greater 341 2.7

1,609 13.04: Somewhat greater 1,950 15.7

5,352 43.13: About right 7,302 58.9

227 1.82: Somewhat less 7,529 60.7

37 0.31: Much less 7,566 61.0

84 0.7-8: Don't Know 7,650 61.7

23 0.2-7: Refused 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SPECUSE Numeric 2.0 139 140

Extent of change over past two years in complexity or severity of patients' conditions treated without referral to specialists. Respondents limited to those in one of the following specialties or subspecialties: Family Practice, Geriatric Medicine, General Practice, Geriatric Internal Medicine, Adolescent Medicine, Internal Medicine/Family Practice, or other specialist(PCP=1).

Description:During the last two years, has the number of patients that you refer to specialists (read 5-1)?Question: D9

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent332 2.75: Increased a lot 332 2.7

1,578 12.74: Increased a little 1,910 15.4

4,874 39.33: Stayed same 6,784 54.7

770 6.22: Decreased a little 7,554 60.9

82 0.71: Decreased a lot 7,636 61.6

34 0.3-8: Don't Know 7,670 61.8

3 0.0-7: Refused 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 26 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 38: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PCTGATE Numeric 3.0 141 143

Respondents limited to those in one of the following specialties or subspecialties: Family Practice, Geriatric Medicine, General Practice, Adolescent Medicine, or other specialist who spends most of his/her time in General Internal Medicine or General Pediatrics (PCP=1).

Description:

Some insurance plans or medical groups REQUIRE their enrollees to obtain permission from a primary care physician before seeing a specialist. For roughly what percent of your patients do you serve in this role?

Question: D10

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent534 4.30 534 4.3

66 0.51% or less 600 4.8

409 3.32-9% 1,009 8.1

726 5.910-19% 1,735 14.0

814 6.620-29% 2,549 20.5

2,215 17.930-59% 4,764 38.4

2,144 17.360-89% 6,908 55.7

765 6.290-100% 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

_PCTGATE Numeric 2.0 144 145

Imputation flag for PCTGATE.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent7,482 60.30: No Imputation 7,482 60.3

191 1.51: Imputation 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 27 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 39: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

CMPCHG Numeric 2.0 146 147

Asked of specialists only (PCP=0).Description:

During the last two years, has the complexity or severity of patients' conditions at the time of referral to you by primary care physicians (read 5-1)?

Question: D11

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,021 8.25: Increased a lot 1,021 8.2

1,341 10.84: Increased a little 2,362 19.0

2,121 17.13: Stayed same 4,483 36.1

134 1.12: Decreased a little 4,617 37.2

41 0.31: Decreased a lot 4,658 37.5

2 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 4,660 37.6

65 0.5-8: Don't Know 4,725 38.1

8 0.1-7: Refused 4,733 38.2

7,673 61.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

CMPLVL Numeric 2.0 148 149

Asked of specialists only (PCP=0).Description:

In general, would you say that the complexity or severity of patients' conditions at the time of referral to you by primary care physicians is (read 5-1)?

Question: D12

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent325 2.65: Much greater 325 2.6

1,191 9.64: Somewhat greater 1,516 12.2

2,726 22.03: About right 4,242 34.2

297 2.42: Somewhat less 4,539 36.6

60 0.51: Much less 4,599 37.1

2 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 4,601 37.1

116 0.9-8: Don't Know 4,717 38.0

16 0.1-7: Refused 4,733 38.2

7,673 61.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 28 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 40: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section D - Medical Care Management

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

CHGREF Numeric 2.0 150 151

Asked of specialists only (PCP=0).Description:

During the last two years, has the number of patients referred to you by primary care physicians (read 5-1)?

Question: D13

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent899 7.25: Increased a lot 899 7.2

1,387 11.24: Increased a little 2,286 18.4

1,701 13.73: Stayed same 3,987 32.1

477 3.82: Decreased a little 4,464 36.0

156 1.31: Decreased a lot 4,620 37.2

2 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 4,622 37.3

96 0.8-8: Don't Know 4,718 38.0

15 0.1-7: Refused 4,733 38.2

7,673 61.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 29 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 41: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

ADQTIME Numeric 2.0 152 153

Strength of agreement: I have adequate time to spend with my patients during typical office/patient visits. Constructed using responses to questions F1A and F1B. If F1A="7, no office", then the physician was asked F1B about adequate time during a patient visit.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,400 27.45: Agree strongly 3,400 27.4

4,217 34.04: Agree somewhat 7,617 61.4

2,853 23.03: Disagree somewhat 10,470 84.4

1,605 12.92: Disagree strongly 12,075 97.3

288 2.31: Neither agree or disagree 12,363 99.7

43 0.3-9: Not Ascertained 12,406 100.0

CLNFREE Numeric 2.0 154 155

I have the freedom to make clinical decisions that meet my patients' needs.Question: F1C

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent6,412 51.75: Agree strongly 6,412 51.7

4,293 34.64: Agree somewhat 10,705 86.3

1,162 9.43: Disagree somewhat 11,867 95.7

355 2.92: Disagree strongly 12,222 98.5

161 1.31: Neither agree or disagree 12,383 99.8

14 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,397 99.9

9 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 30 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 42: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

HIGHCAR Numeric 2.0 156 157

It is possible to provide high quality care to all of my patients.Question: F1D

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,211 42.05: Agree strongly 5,211 42.0

4,491 36.24: Agree somewhat 9,702 78.2

1,808 14.63: Disagree somwhat 11,510 92.8

637 5.12: Disagree strongly 12,147 97.9

242 2.01: Neither agree or disagree 12,389 99.9

10 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,399 99.9

7 0.1-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

NEGINCN Numeric 2.0 158 159

I can make clinical decisions in the best interests of my patients without the possibility of reducing my income.

Question: F1E

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent6,165 49.75: Agree strongly 6,165 49.7

3,494 28.24: Agree somewhat 9,659 77.9

1,443 11.63: Disagree somewhat 11,102 89.5

749 6.02: Disagree strongly 11,851 95.5

436 3.51: Neither agree or disagree 12,287 99.0

94 0.8-8: Don't Know 12,381 99.8

25 0.2-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 31 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 43: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

USESPCS Numeric 2.0 160 161

This question was asked only of PCPs (PCP=1).Description:

The level of communication I have with specialists about the patients I refer to them is sufficient to ensure the delivery of high quality care.

Question: F1F

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,017 24.35: Agree strongly 3,017 24.3

3,121 25.24: Agree somewhat 6,138 49.5

1,043 8.43: Disagree somwhat 7,181 57.9

270 2.22: Disagree strongly 7,451 60.1

198 1.61: Neither agree or disagree 7,649 61.7

18 0.1-8: Don't Know 7,667 61.8

6 0.0-7: Refused 7,673 61.8

4,733 38.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

COMPRM Numeric 2.0 162 163

This question was asked only of specialists (PCP=0).Description:

The level of communication I have with primary care physicians about the patients they refer to me is sufficient to ensure the delivery of high quality care.

Question: F1G

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,668 13.45: Agree strongly 1,668 13.4

1,905 15.44: Agree somewhat 3,573 28.8

708 5.73: Disagree somewhat 4,281 34.5

202 1.62: Disagree strongly 4,483 36.1

163 1.31: Neither agree or disagree 4,646 37.4

2 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 4,648 37.5

71 0.6-8: Don't Know 4,719 38.0

14 0.1-7: Refused 4,733 38.2

7,673 61.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 32 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 44: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

COMMALL Numeric 2.0 164 165

Strength of agreement that a primary care physician (PCP) (or specialist) has sufficient communication with specialist (or PCP) to ensure delivery of high quality care. Constructed from responses to questions F1F (for PCPs) and F1G (for specialists).

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,685 37.85: Agree strongly 4,685 37.8

5,026 40.54: Agree somewhat 9,711 78.3

1,751 14.13: Disagree somewhat 11,462 92.4

472 3.82: Disagree strongly 11,934 96.2

361 2.91: Neither agree or disagree 12,295 99.1

111 0.9-9: Not Ascertained 12,406 100.0

PATREL Numeric 2.0 166 167

Physicians responding "Does not have office" or "Does not have continuing relationship with patient" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

It is possible to maintain the kind of continuing relationships with patients over time that promote the delivery of high quality care.

Question: F1H

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,596 37.05: Agree strongly 4,596 37.0

4,296 34.64: Agree somewhat 8,892 71.7

1,797 14.53: Disagree somewhat 10,689 86.2

926 7.52: Disagree strongly 11,615 93.6

320 2.61: Neither agree or disagree 11,935 96.2

20 0.2-8: Don't Know 11,955 96.4

4 0.0-7: Refused 11,959 96.4

447 3.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 33 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 45: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

OBREFS Numeric 2.0 168 169

Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

How often are you able to obtain referrals to specialists/other specialists of high quality when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent3,364 27.16: Always 3,364 27.1

5,805 46.85: Almost always 9,169 73.9

2,190 17.74: Frequently 11,359 91.6

844 6.83: Sometimes 12,203 98.4

80 0.62: Rarely 12,283 99.0

5 0.01: Never 12,288 99.0

11 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,299 99.1

2 0.0-7: Refused 12,301 99.2

105 0.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

OBANCL Numeric 2.0 170 171

Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

How often are you able to obtain high quality ancillary services, such as physical therapy, home health care, nutritional counseling, and so forth when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8B

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,319 18.76: Always 2,319 18.7

5,115 41.25: Almost always 7,434 59.9

2,835 22.94: Frequently 10,269 82.8

1,462 11.83: Sometimes 11,731 94.6

234 1.92: Rarely 11,965 96.4

25 0.21: Never 11,990 96.6

11 0.1-8: Don't Know 12,001 96.7

4 0.0-7: Refused 12,005 96.8

401 3.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 34 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 46: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

OBHOSP Numeric 2.0 172 173

Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

How often are you able to obtain non-emergency hospital admissions when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8C

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,707 21.86: Always 2,707 21.8

3,565 28.75: Almost always 6,272 50.6

1,788 14.44: Frequently 8,060 65.0

1,431 11.53: Sometimes 9,491 76.5

663 5.32: Rarely 10,154 81.8

265 2.11: Never 10,419 84.0

1 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 10,420 84.0

28 0.2-8: Don't Know 10,448 84.2

5 0.0-7: Refused 10,453 84.3

1,953 15.7-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

OBINPAT Numeric 2.0 174 175

Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

How often are you able to obtain adequate number of inpatient days for your hospitalized patients when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8D

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,426 19.66: Always 2,426 19.6

3,974 32.05: Almost always 6,400 51.6

2,119 17.14: Frequently 8,519 68.7

1,456 11.73: Sometimes 9,975 80.4

375 3.02: Rarely 10,350 83.4

87 0.71: Never 10,437 84.1

33 0.3-8: Don't Know 10,470 84.4

7 0.1-7: Refused 10,477 84.5

1,929 15.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 35 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 47: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

OBIMAG Numeric 2.0 176 177

Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".Description:

How often are you able to obtain high quality Diagnostic Imaging Services when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8E

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,043 32.66: Always 4,043 32.6

5,682 45.85: Almost always 9,725 78.4

1,814 14.64: Frequently 11,539 93.0

614 4.93: Sometimes 12,153 98.0

79 0.62: Rarely 12,232 98.6

13 0.11: Never 12,245 98.7

4 0.0-8: Don't Know 12,249 98.7

3 0.0-7: Refused 12,252 98.8

154 1.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

OBMENTL Numeric 2.0 178 179

Asked only of PCPs and specialists in ob/gyn and psychiatry. Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".

Description:

How often are you able to obtain high quality INPATIENT MENTAL health care when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8F

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent730 5.96: Always 730 5.9

1,267 10.25: Almost always 1,997 16.1

1,266 10.24: Frequently 3,263 26.3

2,280 18.43: Sometimes 5,543 44.7

1,687 13.62: Rarely 7,230 58.3

389 3.11: Never 7,619 61.4

4 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 7,623 61.4

48 0.4-8: Don't Know 7,671 61.8

11 0.1-7: Refused 7,682 61.9

4,724 38.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 36 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 48: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

OBOUTPT Numeric 2.0 180 181

Asked only of PCPs and specialists in ob/gyn and psychiatry. Physicians responding "Does not apply" or "Facility/Service not available in area" are coded "-1:Inapplicable".

Description:

How often are you able to obtain high quality OUTPATIENT MENTAL health services when you think it is medically necessary?

Question: F8G

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent665 5.46: Always 665 5.4

1,184 9.55: Almost always 1,849 14.9

1,702 13.74: Frequently 3,551 28.6

2,752 22.23: Sometimes 6,303 50.8

1,686 13.62: Rarely 7,989 64.4

213 1.71: Never 8,202 66.1

4 0.0-9: Not Ascertained 8,206 66.1

30 0.2-8: Don't Know 8,236 66.4

8 0.1-7: Refused 8,244 66.5

4,162 33.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

REFPROV Numeric 2.0 182 183

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8A.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain referrals to other specialists of high quality: There aren't enough qualified service providers or facilities in my area.

Question: F8A_aa

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent110 0.910: Very important 110 0.9

594 4.82-9 704 5.7

208 1.71: Not important 912 7.4

11 0.1-8: Don't Know 923 7.4

1 0.0-7: Refused 924 7.4

11,482 92.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 37 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 49: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

REFHP Numeric 2.0 184 185

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8A.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain referrals to other specialists of high quality: Health plan networks and administrative barriers limit patient access.

Question: F8A_ab

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent335 2.710: Very important 335 2.7

563 4.52-9 898 7.2

17 0.11: Not important 915 7.4

6 0.0-8: Don't Know 921 7.4

3 0.0-7: Refused 924 7.4

11,482 92.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

REFINS Numeric 2.0 186 187

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8A.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain referrals to other specialists of high quality: Patients lack health insurance or have inadequate insurance coverage

Question: F8A_ac

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent283 2.310: Very important 283 2.3

581 4.72-9 864 7.0

46 0.41: Not important 910 7.3

12 0.1-8: Don't Know 922 7.4

2 0.0-7: Refused 924 7.4

11,482 92.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 38 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 50: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

HSPPROV Numeric 2.0 188 189

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8C.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain non-emergency hospital admissions: There aren't enough qualified service providers or facilities in my area

Question: F8A_ca

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent145 1.210: Very important 145 1.2

1,244 10.02-9 1,389 11.2

688 5.51: Not important 2,077 16.7

17 0.1-8: Don't Know 2,094 16.9

1 0.0-7: Refused 2,095 16.9

10,311 83.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

HSPHP Numeric 2.0 190 191

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8C.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain non-emergency hospital admissions: Health plan networks and administrative barriers limit patient access.

Question: F8a_cb

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent552 4.410: Very important 552 4.4

1,458 11.82-9 2,010 16.2

68 0.51: Not important 2,078 16.7

16 0.1-8: Don't Know 2,094 16.9

1 0.0-7: Refused 2,095 16.9

10,311 83.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 39 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 51: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

HSPINS Numeric 2.0 192 193

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8C.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain non-emergency hospital admissions: Patients lack health insurance or have inadequate insurance coverage

Question: F8A_cc

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent371 3.010: Very important 371 3.0

1,478 11.92-9 1,849 14.9

227 1.81: Not important 2,076 16.7

18 0.1-8: Don't Know 2,094 16.9

1 0.0-7: Refused 2,095 16.9

10,311 83.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

MHPROV Numeric 2.0 194 195

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8G.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain high quality OUTPATIENT MENTAL health services: There aren't enough qualified service providers or facilities in my area

Question: F8A_ga

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,116 9.010: Very important 1,116 9.0

2,859 23.02-9 3,975 32.0

440 3.51: Not important 4,415 35.6

20 0.2-8: Don't Know 4,435 35.7

3 0.0-7: Refused 4,438 35.8

7,968 64.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 40 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 52: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

MHHP Numeric 2.0 196 197

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8G.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain high quality OUTPATIENT MENTAL health services: Health plan networks and administrative barriers limit patient access.

Question: F8A_gb

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,509 12.210: Very important 1,509 12.2

2,797 22.52-9 4,306 34.7

104 0.81: Not important 4,410 35.5

25 0.2-8: Don't Know 4,435 35.7

3 0.0-7: Refused 4,438 35.8

7,968 64.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

MHINS Numeric 2.0 198 199

Asked of physicians who responded Rarely(2) or Sometimes(3) to question F8G.Description:

Why you might be unable to obtain high quality OUTPATIENT MENTAL health services: Patients lack health insurance or have inadequate insurance coverage

Question: F8A_gc

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,332 10.710: Very important 1,332 10.7

2,941 23.72-9 4,273 34.4

145 1.21: Not important 4,418 35.6

17 0.1-8: Don't Know 4,435 35.7

3 0.0-7: Refused 4,438 35.8

7,968 64.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

NWMCARE Numeric 2.0 200 201

Is the practice accepting all, most, some, or no new patients who are insured through Medicare, including Medicare managed care patients?

Question: F9A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent7,584 61.14: All 7,584 61.1

1,751 14.13: Most 9,335 75.2

1,461 11.82: Some 10,796 87.0

1,610 13.01: No new patients/None 12,406 100.0

Page 41 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 53: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_NWMCARE Numeric 2.0 202 203

Imputation flag for NWMCARE.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent11,909 96.00: No Imputation 11,909 96.0

497 4.01: Imputation 12,406 100.0

NWMCAID Numeric 2.0 204 205

Is the practice accepting all, most, some, or no new patients who are insured through Medicaid, including Medicaid managed care patients?

Question: F9B

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,966 48.14: All 5,966 48.1

1,292 10.43: Most 7,258 58.5

2,309 18.62: Some 9,567 77.1

2,839 22.91: No new patients/None 12,406 100.0

_NWMCAID Numeric 2.0 206 207

Imputation flag for NWMCAID.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,108 97.60: No Imputation 12,108 97.6

298 2.41: Imputation 12,406 100.0

NWPRIV Numeric 2.0 208 209

Is the practice accepting all, most, some, or no new patients who are insured through private or commercial insurance plans including managed care plans and HMOs with whom the practice has contracts? This includes both fee for service patients and patients enrolled in managed care plans with whom the practice has a contract. It excludes Medicaid or Medicare managed care.

Question: F9C

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent8,141 65.64: All 8,141 65.6

2,146 17.33: Most 10,287 82.9

1,444 11.62: Some 11,731 94.6

675 5.41: No new patients/None 12,406 100.0

Page 42 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 54: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_NWPRIV Numeric 2.0 210 211

Imputation flag for NWPRIV.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,198 98.30: No Imputation 12,198 98.3

208 1.71: Imputation 12,406 100.0

NWNPAY Numeric 2.0 212 213

Is the practice accepting all, most, some, or no new uninsured patients who are unable to pay your fees?

Question: F9G

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,115 41.24: All 5,115 41.2

1,531 12.33: Most 6,646 53.6

3,535 28.52: Some 10,181 82.1

2,225 17.91: No new patients/None 12,406 100.0

_NWNPAY Numeric 2.0 214 215

Imputation flag for NWNPAYDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,012 96.80: No Imputation 12,012 96.8

394 3.21: Imputation 12,406 100.0

ACC_CAP Numeric 2.0 216 217

The response "No capitated contracts in the area" is coded as "-1: Inapplicable".Description:

Is the practice accepting any new patients under Capitated contracts; under capitation, a fixed amount is paid per patient per month regardless of services provided?

Question: F10

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,320 42.90: No 5,320 42.9

6,106 49.21: Yes 11,426 92.1

980 7.9-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 43 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 55: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section F - Physician - Patient Interactions

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_ACC_CAP Numeric 2.0 218 219

Imputation flag for ACC_CAP.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,598 85.40: No Imputation 10,598 85.4

828 6.71: Imputation 11,426 92.1

980 7.9-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 44 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 56: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section G - Practice Revenue

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PMCARE Numeric 3.0 220 222

Percent of patient care practice revenue that comes from Medicare. Constructed from responses to questions G1-G1a.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,783 14.40% 1,783 14.4

4,218 34.01-25% 6,001 48.4

4,405 35.526-50% 10,406 83.9

1,591 12.851-75% 11,997 96.7

409 3.376-100% 12,406 100.0

_PMCARE Numeric 2.0 223 224

Imputation flag for PMCARE.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,597 85.40: No Imputation 10,597 85.4

1,809 14.61: Imputation 12,406 100.0

PMCAID Numeric 3.0 225 227

Percent of patient care practice revenue which comes from Medicaid. Constructed from responses to questions G1-G1a.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,874 15.10% 1,874 15.1

8,263 66.61-25% 10,137 81.7

1,648 13.326-50% 11,785 95.0

429 3.551-75% 12,214 98.5

192 1.576-100% 12,406 100.0

_PMCAID Numeric 2.0 228 229

Imputation flag for PMCAID.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,830 87.30: No Imputation 10,830 87.3

1,576 12.71: Imputation 12,406 100.0

Page 45 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 57: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section G - Practice Revenue

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PCAPREV Numeric 3.0 230 232

Percent of practice's patient care revenue paid on capitated or other prepaid basis. Constructed variable based on responses to questions G3, G7b, G8c, and G8g. Some edits were performed on this variable to insure that percent capitated revenue is not greater than percent managed care (PMC) after imputation.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent5,672 45.70% 5,672 45.7

3,670 29.61-25% 9,342 75.3

1,743 14.026-50% 11,085 89.4

726 5.951-75% 11,811 95.2

595 4.876-100% 12,406 100.0

_PCAPREV Numeric 2.0 233 234

Imputation flag for PCAPREV.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent10,818 87.20: No Imputation 10,818 87.2

1,588 12.81: Imputation 12,406 100.0

NMCCONX Numeric 2.0 235 236

Number of contracts that physician's practice has with managed care plans. Based on responses to questions G6-G6c. For confidentiality reasons, this variable was divided into 7 categories, instead of being a continuous variable.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,085 8.70: 0 1,085 8.7

624 5.01: 1 1,709 13.8

2,833 22.82: 2-5 4,542 36.6

3,607 29.13: 6-10 8,149 65.7

1,710 13.84: 11-15 9,859 79.5

1,505 12.15: 16-25 11,364 91.6

1,042 8.46: GT 25 12,406 100.0

Page 46 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 58: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section G - Practice Revenue

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

PMC Numeric 5.1 237 241

Percent of practice's patient care revenue from all managed care. Constructed variable based on responses to questions G7, G7a, G8, G8b, and G8f. Constraints: If PCAPREV > PMC, then PMC was set to equal PCAPREV. This edit was performed before and after imputation. The response "Less than 1%" was coded as "0.5".

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent719 5.80% 719 5.8

1 0.00.5,Less than 1% 720 5.8

2,807 22.61-25% 3,527 28.4

4,129 33.326-50% 7,656 61.7

2,673 21.551-75% 10,329 83.3

2,077 16.776-100% 12,406 100.0

_PMC Numeric 2.0 242 243

Imputation flag for PMC.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,247 98.70: No Imputation 12,247 98.7

159 1.31: Imputation 12,406 100.0

Page 47 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 59: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

SALPAID Numeric 2.0 244 245

Full owners of solo practices were not asked this question.Description:Are you a salaried physician?Question: H1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,785 22.40: No 2,785 22.4

6,597 53.21: Yes 9,382 75.6

16 0.1-8: Don't Know 9,398 75.8

7 0.1-7: Refused 9,405 75.8

3,001 24.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SALTIME Numeric 2.0 246 247

Full owners of solo practices and salaried physicians (SALPAID=1) were not asked this question.Description:

Are you paid in direct relation to the amount of time you work, such as by the shift or by the hour?

Question: H2

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,196 17.70: No 2,196 17.7

602 4.91: Yes 2,798 22.6

6 0.0-8: Don't Know 2,804 22.6

4 0.0-7: Refused 2,808 22.6

9,598 77.4-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SALADJ Numeric 2.0 248 249

Asked of salaried physicians (SALPAID=1).Description:

Is your base salary a fixed amount that will not change until your salary is renegotiated or is it adjusted up or down during the present contract period depending on your performance or that of the practice?

Question: H3

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent4,237 34.21: Fixed amount 4,237 34.2

2,314 18.72: Adjusted up or down 6,551 52.8

38 0.3-8: Don't Know 6,589 53.1

8 0.1-7: Refused 6,597 53.2

5,809 46.8-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 48 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 60: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

BONUS Numeric 2.0 250 251

Asked only of physicians who are hourly workers (SALTIME=1), or whose salary is not adjusted (SALADJ NE 2).Description:

Are you also currently eligible to earn income through any type of bonus or incentive plan? Bonus can include any type of payment above the fixed, guaranteed salary.

Question: H4

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,503 20.20: Not eligible for bonus now 2,503 20.2

2,357 19.01: Eligible for bonus now 4,860 39.2

22 0.2-8: Don't Know 4,882 39.4

3 0.0-7: Refused 4,885 39.4

7,521 60.6-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SPROD Numeric 2.0 252 253

A flag indicating that the physician's compensation is affected by own productivity. Constructed from responses to questions H5A and H7A. Full owners of solo practices were not asked this question.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,633 21.20: Productvty doesnt affect comp 2,633 21.2

6,664 53.71: Productvty affects comp 9,297 74.9

108 0.9-9: Not Ascertained 9,405 75.8

3,001 24.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SSAT Numeric 2.0 254 255

A flag indicating that the physician's compensation is affected by satisfaction surveys completed by physician's own patients. Constructed from responses to questions H5B and H7B. Full owners of solo practices were not asked this question.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent6,813 54.90: Patnt satsfctn doesnt affect comp 6,813 54.9

2,429 19.61: Patnt satsfctn affects comp 9,242 74.5

163 1.3-9: Not Ascertained 9,405 75.8

3,001 24.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 49 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 61: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

SQUAL Numeric 2.0 256 257

A flag indicating that the physician's compensation is affected by specific measures of quality of care. Constructed from responses to questions H5C and H7C. Full owners of solo practices were not asked this question.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent7,370 59.40: Qualty measure doesnt affect comp 7,370 59.4

1,851 14.91: Qualty measure affects comp 9,221 74.3

184 1.5-9: Not Ascertained 9,405 75.8

3,001 24.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

SPROF Numeric 2.0 258 259

A flag indicating that the physician's compensation is affected by practice profiling. Constructed from responses to questions H5D and H7D. Full owners of solo practices were not asked this question.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent7,973 64.30: Profile not affectd comp 7,973 64.3

1,233 9.91: Profile affectd comp 9,206 74.2

199 1.6-9: Not Ascertained 9,405 75.8

3,001 24.2-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

RADJ Numeric 2.0 260 261

If profiled, a flag indicating risk adjustment of profiles. Constructed from responses to questions H6 and H8. Full owners of solo practices and physicians whose practice does not use practice profiles were not asked this question.

Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent549 4.40: Profile not risk adjusted 549 4.4

684 5.51: Profile risk-adjusted 1,233 9.9

11,173 90.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 50 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 62: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

_RADJ Numeric 2.0 262 263

Imputation flag for RADJ.Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,137 9.20: No Imputation 1,137 9.2

96 0.81: Imputation 1,233 9.9

11,173 90.1-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

PCTINCX Numeric 2.0 264 265

Percent of 1999 income from bonuses, returned withholds, or other incentive payments based on physician's performance. Constructed from responses to questions H9 and H9a. An edit was performed on this variable so that it does not apply for physicians who are not eligible for bonuses (EBONUS=0). Values were top coded at 40% for confidentiality reasons.

Description:

Of your total income from your practice during calendar year 1999, approximately what percent would you estimate was earned in the form of bonuses, returned withholds, or other incentive payments based on your performance?

Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,164 9.40% 1,164 9.4

713 5.71% or less 1,877 15.1

4,055 32.72-39% 5,932 47.8

443 3.640% (top code) 6,375 51.4

8 0.1-9: Not Ascertained 6,383 51.5

6,023 48.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 51 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 63: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

EBONUS Numeric 2.0 266 267

Those who originally responded with a value of 0 in H9 (the unedited version) were asked this question. This response (EBONUS) was then used to edit PCTINCC or PCTINCX to be "Inapplicable" if EBONUS=0 (not eligible for a bonus in 1999).

Description:Were you eligible to earn any bonuses or other performance-based payments in 1999?Question: H9a

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent6,023 48.50: No 6,023 48.5

952 7.71: Yes 6,975 56.2

140 1.1-8: Don't Know 7,115 57.4

20 0.2-7: Refused 7,135 57.5

5,271 42.5-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

INCOMEX Numeric 2.0 268 269

Physician's 1999 net income from practice of medicine. Values are reported in $50,000 increments. Top coded at $300,000.Description:

During 1999, what was your own net income from the practice of medicine to the nearest $1,000, after expenses but before taxes? Please include contributions to retirement plans made for you by the practice and any bonuses as well as fees, salaries and re

Question: H10

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent584 4.71: $0-49999 584 4.7

2,010 16.22: $50000-99999 2,594 20.9

4,163 33.63: $100000-149999 6,757 54.5

2,497 20.14: $150000-199999 9,254 74.6

1,355 10.95: $200000-249999 10,609 85.5

730 5.96: $250000-299999 11,339 91.4

1,058 8.57: $300000 or more (top code) 12,397 99.9

9 0.1-9: Not Ascertained 12,406 100.0

Page 52 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 64: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

INCENT Numeric 2.0 270 271

How would you describe your overall personal financial incentives in your practice? On balance, do these incentives favor reducing services to individual patients, favor expanding services to individual patients, or favor neither?

Question: H10b

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent981 7.91: Reducing serv 981 7.9

2,807 22.62: Expanding serv 3,788 30.5

8,618 69.53: Favor neither 12,406 100.0

_INCENT Numeric 2.0 272 273

Imputation flag for INCENTDescription:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent11,980 96.60: No Imputation 11,980 96.6

426 3.41: Imputation 12,406 100.0

EFINCNT Numeric 2.0 274 275

Have these incentives reduced/ expanded services a little, a moderate amount, or a lot?Question: H10b1

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent1,804 14.51: A little 1,804 14.5

1,166 9.42: A moderate amount 2,970 23.9

358 2.93: A lot 3,328 26.8

318 2.64: None 3,646 29.4

28 0.2-8: Don't Know 3,674 29.6

5 0.0-7: Refused 3,679 29.7

8,727 70.3-1: Inapplicable 12,406 100.0

Page 53 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 65: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

FININCPT Numeric 2.0 276 277

A description of the effect of personal financial incentives on the overall practice of medicine. Constructed from responses to questions H10b and H10b1Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent110 0.91: Reduce a lot 110 0.9

263 2.12: Reduce a moderate amt 373 3.0

454 3.73: Reduce a little 827 6.7

117 0.94: Favor reduction,but no effect 944 7.6

8,618 69.55: Favor neither 9,562 77.1

201 1.66: Favor expansion,but no effect 9,763 78.7

1,350 10.97: Expand a little 11,113 89.6

903 7.38: Expand a moderate amt 12,016 96.9

248 2.09: Expand a lot 12,264 98.9

142 1.1-9: Not Ascertained 12,406 100.0

COMPETE Numeric 2.0 278 279

Now, thinking about your practice specifically, how would you describe the competitive situation your practice faces?

Question: H10c

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,605 21.03: Very competitive 2,605 21.0

5,502 44.32: Somewhat comp 8,107 65.3

4,183 33.71: Not at all comp 12,290 99.1

90 0.7-8: Don't Know 12,380 99.8

26 0.2-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 54 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 66: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Section H - Physician Compensation Methods & Income Level

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

RACEX Numeric 2.0 280 281

For confidentiality reasons, African-American/Black, Native American or Alaskan Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, and Other were combined into one category called Other.

Description:

What race do you consider yourself to be? I understand this question may be sensitive. We are trying to understand how physicians from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds perceive some of the changes that are affecting the delivery of medical care.

Question: H12

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent2,503 20.21: Other 2,503 20.2

9,774 78.82: White/Caucasian 12,277 99.0

26 0.2-8: Don't Know 12,303 99.2

103 0.8-7: Refused 12,406 100.0

Page 55 of 56Release 1, September 2003

Page 67: Community Tracking Study Physician Survey Round Three · 2018-08-28 · Community Tracking Study 2000-01 Physician Survey Public Use File: Codebook (Release 1) 600 Maryland Avenue,

CTS Physician Survey Public Use File2000/2001 Data

Weights and Sampling Variables

Variable Name Variable Type Length Start End

WTPHY4 Numeric 10.6 282 291

A weight for making national estimates from the survey (using all observations from the combined 60 site and supplemental samples).Description:Question: N/A

Cum CumPct Value Count Percent12,406 100.04.17-439.55 12,406 100.0

Page 56 of 56Release 1, September 2003