Community Planning Academy Atlanta Metro 2040 FUTURE SHOCK Arthur C. Nelson, Ph.D, FAICP Professor &...
-
Upload
melvyn-lambert -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Community Planning Academy Atlanta Metro 2040 FUTURE SHOCK Arthur C. Nelson, Ph.D, FAICP Professor &...
Community Planning Academy
Atlanta Metro 2040FUTURE SHOCK
Arthur C. Nelson, Ph.D, FAICP
Professor & Director, Urban Affairs & Planning
Virginia Tech – Alexandria Center
March 23, 2006
Getting Ahead of the CurveMetropolitan Atlanta 2000-2040
Category 2000 2040___
Population 4.2 million 9.4 million
Housing Units 1.6 million 3.7 million
Jobs 2.8 million 4.7 million
Residential Development Metropolitan Atlanta 2000-2040
Figure 2000 to 2040
Growth-Related Units Built 2 million
Replaced Units Built 1 million
Total Units Built 3 million
Nonresidential Development Metropolitan Atlanta 2000-2040
US 2000 to 2040
Growth-Related Square Feet 1 billion
Replaced Square Feet 2 billion
Total Square Feet 3 billion
What About ….?
Telecommuting? Office hotelling? Internet retailing? Emerging technologies?
And their effect on future space needs?
Retail Trends Share of grocery store, warehouse club, super store, & department store sales, catalog sales, Internet sales
0%
20%
40%
60%
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Source: US Census Bureau
Reality Check
Space Class 1992 2003 %DifRetail & Service 57 62 +9%Office, Medical, Ed. 88 87 -1%Total Glamour Space 145 149 +3%Warehouse & Storage 45 35 -23%All Other 75 63 -16%
Figures for U.S.Non-percentage figures per capita based on Census estimates.Source: Energy Information Administration, Commercial Buildings Energy
Consumption Surveys for 1992 and 2003.
Bottom LineNew Construction
Metropolitan Atlanta 2000-2040
Construction
Residential $750 Billion
Nonresidential $400 Billion
Infrastructure $150 Billion
Total $ 1.3 Trillion
Market Analysts Finding Changing Preferences
National Association of RealtorsNational Association of Home BuildersNationally Recognized Market Analysts
Urban Land InstituteLend Lease/PriceWaterhouseCoopers
Joint Center for Housing Policy at HarvardGolfing Buddies and Taxi Drivers
The New Urban Economics Old School
People locate where jobs areThe “employment-centric” model
New SchoolJobs locate where people areThe “homo-centric” model
The New Urban EconomicsReal estate development follows peopleWhere are people going?
Source: Arthur O’Sullivan, Urban Economics, Sixth Edition (2007).
What is the Market Telling Us?
Resale prices of condominiums rival resale prices of single-family homes for first time ever
Appreciation of condominiums is higher than single-family homes nationally and in every region
Resale Prices 2002-2005[SF = detached + townhouse, CC = condominium + cooperative]
Region 2002SF 2005SF 2002CC 2005CC
US $158 $207 $142 $218
NE $164 $244 $147 $252
MW $136 $166 $149 $189
S $147 $178 $115 $195
W $215 $314 $172 $261
Figures in thousands of dollars.
Source: National Association of Realtors 2006.
Appreciation 2002-2005
Region SF Percent CC Percent
US 31% 54%
NE 49% 71%
MW 22% 27%
S 21% 70%
W 46% 52%
Source: Adapted from National Association of Realtors 2006.
“Traditional” Householdson the Wane
Household Type 1960 2000 2040 HH with Children 48% 33% 27% Single-Person HH 13% 26% 30%
Figures for U.S.Source: Census for 1960 and 2000, 2040 adapted from Martha Farnsworth Riche, How Changes in the Nation’s Age and Household Structure Will Reshape Housing Demand in the 21st Century, HUD (2003).
People Turning 65 1950-2025
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Thousands
Source: Rosen Consulting
Share of Growth 2000-2040
HH Type 2000 2040 Change %Share
W/ children 35 41 6 13%
W/o children 71 111 40 87%
Single-person 26 44 17 38%
Figures for U.S.
Figures in millions of households.
Source: Adapted and extrapolated from Martha Farnsworth Riche, How Changes in the Nation's Age and Household Structure Will Reshape Housing Demand in the 21st Century, HUD (2003).
Neighborhood Feature Preferences
Tra
nsit
Ac
ces
s
Scho
ol
Wa
lk
Sto
res,
Ea
tin
g
Sid
ew
alk
s
Hous
ing
Mix
Eth
nic
Mix
Incom
e M
ix
Lif
e-C
yc
le M
ix
Neighborhood Feature
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Perc
ent
Source: National Association of Realtors & Smart Growth America, American Preference Survey 2004.
Retired Location Preference
In a city 14%
In a suburb close to a city 37%
Total “urban” 51%
In a suburb away from a city19%
In a rural community 30%
Suburbs away from cities are the losers
Source: National Association of Realtors & Smart Growth America, American Preference Survey 2004.
Housing Choices of ElderlyHousing Type All Elderly Elderly
MoversDetached 69% 35%Townhouse 5% 11%2+ Units in Bldg 19% 43%Manufactured 7% 11%All Attached 24% 54%Owner 80% 41%
Source: American Housing Survey 2003. New movers means moved in past year. Annual elderly movers are about 5% of all elderly households; 75%+ of all elderly will change housing type between ages 65 and 80.
Elderly Downsizing
Measure Before After
House size 1,687 sf 1,450 sf
% Change -14%
Lot size 0.35 ac 0.24 ac
% Change -31%
Source: American Housing Survey 2003.
Preference Survey SignalsAll Households
Housing Type Survey Range, Unit Type
Owner attached Townhouses
17% to 33%
Condos
9% to 14%
Small lots (<7k sf) Cluster, other
37% to 57%
Source: Adapted from Myers & Gearin, “Future Demand for Denser Residential Neighborhoods”, Housing Policy Debate (2001).
Future Housing Shares – US
Housing Type 2003 2040
Apartment 24% 30%
Owner Attached 11% 20%
Small Lot 15% 30%
Large Lot 51% 20%
Source: 2003 data from American Housing Survey 2003. 2040 figures derived from preference surveys.
US Demand in 2040
50% Attached (apartment, TH, condo, etc.)30% Detached small/cluster/zero-lot20% Conventional subdivision
80% = Traditional Urban Density
Even in Plano, TexasEven in Plano, Texas
Atlanta Future Housing Shares
Housing Type 2004 2040
Apartment 19% 25%
Owner Attached 4% 15%
Small Lot 15% 25%
Large Lot 62% 35%
Source: 2003 data from American Housing Survey 2003. 2040 figures derived from preference surveys.
Atlanta Demand in 2040
40% Attached (apartment, TH, condo, etc.)25% Detached small/cluster/zero-lot35% Conventional subdivision
65% = Traditional Urban Density @ transit-supportive density
2004 Supply & 2040 Demand
Housing Type 2004 2040 Change % Dif
Apartments 350 925 575 165%
Owner Attach 65 555 490 750%
Small Lot 135 925 790 585%
Large Lot 1,250 1,295 45 4%
Total 1,800 3,700 1,900 106%
Figures in thousands and may not add due to rounding.
Source: 2004 data from American Housing Survey – Atlanta.
What Futurists Tell Us
Cheap energy is over.
Rising global competition for construction materials.
Bio-medical advances will extend lifetimes. Another 20 years added?
Wasteful Residential EnergyGeorgia Energy Lost as % of Energy Used
5-Year Periods 1970 to 2000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Perc
en
t R
es
identi
al
Energ
y L
os
t
Source: Energy Information Administration 2006.
Invest Where the People Will Be 71% of elderly want transit options (AARP) 50% of public want expanded transit investment
but only 25% want new roads (NAR) Large-scale home builders want transit options ULI, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, others
Do not invest in suburban fringe Highest rates of return in redevelopment, infill
Understand changing preferences Affluent elderly who want urbane opportunities Young professions who delay child-rearing Some shifting preferences even in families with children
Planners Need To … Know implications of demographic changes. Anticipate rising prices in energy, construction. Understand market responsiveness to
New Atlanta Metropolis development. Invent new financing tools to earn high long-
term gains in the New Atlanta Metropolis investments despite short-term low returns.
Create win-win public-private partnerships.