Community of Practice on Management for Development Results (CoP-MfDR) 2008 Annual Meeting
description
Transcript of Community of Practice on Management for Development Results (CoP-MfDR) 2008 Annual Meeting
Community of Practice on Management for Development Results (CoP-MfDR)
2008 Annual Meeting
VIETNAM'S EXPERIENCES ON MfDR
11-14 November – Colombo, Srilanka
CONTENTS
II. ODA NATIONAL M&E SYSTEM
I. MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT RESUTS
PART I. MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT RESULTS
CONNECTIVITY FOR MfDR
Better Development
Key Elements for MfDR
Leadership and political will.
Accountable to development results.
Participation of development actors, including CoPs.
Capacity of the country.
Application of MfDR in Vietnam
Vietnam adopted the results-based management system in 2002 through its results-based monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of Comprehensive Poverty Reduction and Growth Strategy (CPRGS).With good example of CPRGS, in 2004 Vietnam decided to apply best practice principles in MfDR to formulate its SEDP 2006-2010. In spotlight of PD and HCS, the donor community in Vietnam is committed to align to SEDP at national, provincial and sectoral levels and make joint efforts with the Government in MfDR.Strengthening the national systems (planning, budgeting, monitoring and evaluation with support from statistics, etc.) to serve the demand of MfDR has received very special attention from the Government.
Planning and Budgeting
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD), Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and (MONRE) used logframe as management tool for their 5-year sectoral development plan. Thua Thien Hue province produced a Handbook on Strategic Planning and Results-based Management for guiding their agencies in planning and budgeting the provincial development.
SEDP Monitoring and Evaluation
MPI introduced the results-based M&E framework on Implementation of SEDP 2006 - 2010 and the Guidelines to the line ministries and provinces to conduct their periodical reviews based on this framework. Mid-term review of SEDP 2006-2010 has been conducted based on this M&E framework.The M&E results will support the Government in their decision making and in improving the way of formulating SEDP 2011-2015.
MfDR for ODA Resources
Developing ODA Strategic Framework 2006-2010 and its Implementation Plan to support SEDP 2006-2010.
Establishing the national ODA M&E system with a clear vision and road map set out in the ODA Monitoring and Evaluation Framework 2006-2010.
Planning to set up Vietnam Evaluation Society (VES) in 2009
How to bring MfDR agenda forward?
1. Continue to make change in mindset of the leaders and senior managers (MfDR culture with evidence-based decision -making).
2. Further develop capacity at the sub-national level (planning, budgeting, result-based management, M&E).
3. Broaden the national network of aid effectiveness to MfDR with engagement of CoPs (especially MfDR-related professional organizations such as Vietnam Statistic Association).
PART II. ODA NATIONAL M&E SYSTEM
M&E for MfDR
Better Development
NATIONAL ODA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ODA STATE MANAGEMENT AGENCIES (MPI, MOF, MOFA, MOJ, OOG)
LINE AGENCIES (LINE MINISTRIES, PROVINCIES, etc.)
PRIME MINISTER
PROJECT OWNER
PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT
3 Pillars in ODA M&E System Development
1. Institutional framework:a) Strategic M&E Framework for ODA b) Decree, Circulars, Decision
2. Capacity development:a) M&E Manual (methodologies, techniques and
tools).b) Training workshops.c) Development of M&E champion.
3. IT development: Integrated IT tools for national ODA monitoring
system
NATIONAL ODA MONITORING SYSTEM
•Aligned Monitoring framework•Definitions and procedures to support framework•Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT)•Methods and tools in Manual progress monitoring•National M&E Manual and Website
•Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT)•Portfolio Monitoring Tool (PMT)•Sectoral benchmarking indicators - progress•Portfolio and contract review tools•National M&E Manual and Website
•ODA-MIS•Aligned Monitoring Tool (AMT)•National benchmarking indicators – process•Sectoral benchmarking indicators - progress•Portfolio Monitoring Tool (PMT)•Portfolio and contract review tools•National M&E Manual and Website•National M&E Resource Centre
NationalAgencies
Quarterly Portfolio
PMT
PMU
LineAgency
Donor DonorLine
AgencyLine
Agency
PMU PMUPMU PMU PMU PMUPMU
Quarterly Portfolio
PMT
Feedback & Benchmarkin
g
Feedback & Benchmarkin
g
Quarterly Progress AMT
through Project Owner
Quarterly Progress AMT
through Project Owner
GSO
Prime Minister&
National Assembly
ALIGNED MONITORING TOOL (AMT) AT PROJECT OWNER/PMU LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
ALIGNED MONITORING TOOL (AMT) AT PROJECT OWNER/PMU LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
MEASURING EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
Overall Goal
Purpose& actual
outcomes
Outputs
Activities
Inputs
Stakeholder needs & desired outcomes
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Impact& Relevance
Sustainability
To measure effectiveness we need data on: Outputs and Outcomes
To measure efficiency we need data on:
Inputs and Outputs
Disbursement data is an input measure.
By itself it tells us very little.
It is what the inputs result in that is important!
MONITOR 3 TYPES OF CHANGE
Disbursement Variance between actual and planned rate
of disbursement
Process Variance between actual and planned time
taken to complete required processes for bidding, contract implementation, resettlement and environmental management
Performance Variance between actual and planned
implementation of activities and achievement of outputs
PORTFOLIO MONITORING TOOL (PMT) AT LINE AGENCY LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
PORTFOLIO MONITORING TOOL (PMT) AT LINE AGENCY LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
DATA AVAILABLE FROM PMT
Disbursement Rate Achievement Rate Bid Start Delay Bidding Efficiency Contract Performance Indicator Contract Completion Delay Resettlement Approval Delay Resettlement Planning Efficiency Resettlement Implementation
Efficiency Resettlement Handover Delay Environment Plan Approval Delay Environment Planning Efficiency Environment Implementation
Delay
RATING PROJECTS WITH AMT DATA
Disbursement Overall RatingContract PerformanceResettlement HandoverBidding EfficiencyBidding Delay
R
U
S
G
Dis
burs
emen
t
R
U
S
G
Bidd
ing
Effic
ienc
y
R
U
S
G
Bidd
ing
Del
ay
R
U
S
G
Bidd
ing
Del
ay
R
U
S
G
Bidd
ing
Effic
ienc
y
R
U
S
G
Res
ettle
men
tH
ando
ver
R
U
S
G
Res
ettle
men
tH
ando
ver
R
U
S
G
Res
ettle
men
tH
ando
ver
R
U
S
G
Con
tract
Perfo
rman
ce
R
U
S
G
Con
tract
Perfo
rman
ce
R
U
S
G
Con
tract
Perfo
rman
ce
R
U
S
G
Con
tract
Perfo
rman
ce
G
Good
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
U
S
At Risk
R
RATING PROJECTS USING PMT
RATING PROJECTS USING PMT
NATIONAL MONITORING TOOL (NMT) AT MPI/MOF LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
NATIONAL MONITORING TOOL (NMT) AT MPI/MOF LEVEL
Project Owner/PMU
Donor
MPI/MOF
Line Agency
AMT
AMTAMT
PMT
Feedback
NMT
Feedback
Feedback
NATIONAL MONITORING TOOL (NMT)
Similar to the PMT but receives the AMT from all projects
It includes charts and indicators that are specific to national-level monitoring
Includes reports that are required by the Prime Minister
NMT DEMONSTRATION
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION