Community Infrastructure Levy Statement of Consultation · PDF fileCommunity Infrastructure...
54
Community Infrastructure Levy Statement of Consultation • Summary of responses received to the Preliminary Draft Schedule consultation • Consultation Process Draft Schedule consultation February 2015 City Mayor
-
Upload
nguyenmien -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Community Infrastructure Levy Statement of Consultation · PDF fileCommunity Infrastructure...
Community Infrastructure Levy Statement of Consultation• Summary of responses received to the Preliminary Draft
Schedule consultation• Consultation Process
Draft Schedule consultationFebruary 2015
City Mayor
Contents
1.0 Background 5
2.0 Consultation and engagement with development 5
industry representatives
3.0 Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Consultation 5
4.0 Summary of Responses Received to Preliminary 8
Draft Schedule Consultation
Appendix 1: Consultation Workshops 5th July 2012 - 11th December 2012 16
Appendix 2: List of consultees at Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule 31
Appendix 3: Email and letter sent to Consultees 42
Appendix 4: CIL web page 45
Appendix 5: Press Statement 48
Appendix 6: Consultations Portal 52
Appendix 7: CIL Watch Extract 54
Cover photograph © Getmapping Plc
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 5
Community Infrastructure Levy
Summary of Consultation Process
1.0 Background
1.1 The Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is a locally set standard charge that can be applied to new development to fund infrastructure. In order to charge CIL, charging authorities must prepare a Charging Schedule. Leicester City Council as the charging has prepared a Draft Charging Schedule, which sets out proposed CIL charges for diff erent types of development within the District.
1.2 Leicester City council has been preparing its CIL Charging Schedule since 2012. This document summarises the consultation and engagement undertaken.
2.0 Consultation and engagement with development industry representatives
2.1 In order to ensure that a CIL charge would not put at risk the delivery of the Core Strategy, the Council commissioned a CIL Viability Assessment.
2.2 The Council Commissioned with the rest of Leicester & Rutland local authorities, URS to undertake the viability assessment. During the preparation of the viability assessment, 2 stakeholder workshop days were held, which were attended by over 50 interested bodies in July and December 2012. Information regarding who was invited, and who attended these workshops can be found within appendix 1. The CIL Viability Assessment was published alongside the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule in May 2014. This provided those in the development industry the opportunity to check and challenge, if necessary, the assumptions and fi ndings at a relatively early stage.
3.0 Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Consultation
3.1 Leicester City Council published a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule consultation document for a 6 week consultation between Wednesday 28th May 2014 and Thursday 10th July 2014.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION6
3.2 The consultation document sought to provide an introduction to CIL and an overview of how the Council had come to the proposed charges set out, including a summary of the Viability Assessment.
3.3 In addition to the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule the Council also published a number of documents that were used as evidence to inform the development of the Schedule. This included:
• Community Infrastructure Levy: Viability Study;
• CIL Infrastructure Projects List and Funding Gap;
• Draft Regulation 123 List and Instalments Policy.
3.4 The consultation was publicised by:
• A mail to all consultees on the Council’s Local Plan mailing list based on the adopted statement of community involvement, as well as specifi c bodies with an interest in CIL. This was done by email or post, depending on the preferred method of contact.
3.5 Appendices 2 - 7 set put the details of publicity. This included:
• Neighbouring Local Planning Authorities;
• Leicestershire County Council and other nearby County Councils;
• Village and Parish Councils;
• Key Infrastructure Providers;
• Developers and Planning Agents;
• Voluntary and charity sector organisations; and
• Interested members of the public.
• A page on the Council’s website;;
• A specifi c consultation page on the Council’s Citizen space pages;
• A press release; and
• A copy of the websites and press release can be found in Appendix 3.
3.6 The consultation documents were publicised at the following locations:
• The Council’s website;
• The Council’s customer service centres; and
• All libraries within Leicester via the public internet access.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 7
3.8 A total of 21 respondents made comments on the consultation documents. A summary of comments and the Council’s response is set out in section 4 below.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION8
Pre
lim
ina
ry D
raft
Sc
he
du
le C
on
sult
ati
on
28
th M
ay
– 1
0th
Ju
ly 2
01
4
Sta
tem
en
t o
f C
on
sult
ati
on
4.0
S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
ses
Re
ceiv
ed
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
1S
tev
e P
aw
son
, A
cce
nt
& W
ilk
inso
n
Arc
hit
ec
ts
Impe
tus
for C
IL a
rose
in a
per
iod
of ra
pid
expa
nsio
n. C
ounc
ils
have
to b
e ve
ry c
aref
ul o
n le
vel o
f CIL
impo
sed.
CIL
sho
uld
not
disc
oura
ge d
evel
oper
s, es
peci
ally
rela
ting
to im
pact
on
entr
y le
vel h
omes
.
Com
men
ts n
oted
. Th
e Le
ices
ter C
IL ra
te h
as b
een
care
fully
set
wel
l with
in th
e m
argi
ns o
f via
bilit
y an
d w
ill n
ot c
ompr
omis
e de
velo
pmen
t. A
n up
date
to th
e vi
abili
ty s
tudy
for t
he D
raft
Sch
edul
e Co
nsul
tatio
n ha
s co
nfi rm
ed th
e CI
L ra
tes
PD
CS
2A
nd
rew
Tw
igg
An
dre
w T
wig
g &
A
sso
cia
tes
Ltd
Com
men
ts re
late
to H
arbo
roug
h D
istr
ict C
ounc
il po
licie
s, an
d vi
abili
ty o
f dev
elop
men
t with
in H
arbo
roug
h.Th
e Co
unci
l not
es th
at th
e co
mm
ents
rela
te to
pol
icy
and
appr
oach
to v
iabi
lity
in H
arbo
roug
h D
istr
ict C
ounc
il.W
hils
t reg
ard
shou
ld b
e ta
ken
of C
IL ra
tes
in a
djoi
ning
LA
ar
eas,
the
Coun
cil c
anno
t com
men
t on
polic
y an
d pr
actic
e in
H
arbo
roug
h.Th
e Le
ices
ter C
IL ra
te h
as b
een
set i
n ac
cord
ance
with
the
viab
ility
evi
denc
e fo
r the
City
.
PD
CS
3E
. F
orr
est
Civ
il A
via
tio
n
Au
tho
rity
Sa
fety
& A
irsp
ace
R
eg
ula
tio
n G
rou
p
The
CAA
sho
uld
be c
onsu
lted
on a
ppro
pria
te m
atte
rsN
o co
mm
ents
on
CIL
Com
men
ts n
oted
PD
CS
4C
lair
e B
idd
le
DT
Z
On
be
ha
lf o
f R
oy
al
Ma
il
Roya
l Mai
l (RM
) is
curr
ently
the
sole
des
igna
ted
prov
ider
of t
he
Uni
vers
al P
osta
l Ser
vice
and
ope
rate
s in
a h
ighl
y co
mpe
titiv
e m
arke
t.RM
ow
ns th
e Le
ices
ter d
eliv
ery
offi c
e –
Cam
pbel
l Str
eet,
and
Leic
este
r Nor
th D
eliv
ery
offi c
e, L
ough
boro
ugh
Road
as
wel
l as
leas
ehol
d pr
oper
ties
at E
lland
Roa
d an
d N
elso
n St
reet
Car
Par
k.Co
re S
trat
egy
grow
th w
ill p
lace
sig
nifi c
ant b
urde
n on
RM
cap
acity
to
del
iver
ser
vice
sA
s a
stat
utor
y pr
ovid
er R
M m
ay re
quire
a n
ew s
ite th
roug
h S1
06
or in
fras
truc
ture
fund
ing
thro
ugh
CIL
and
the
pote
ntia
l nee
d fo
r fu
ndin
g fo
r ess
entia
l inf
rast
ruct
ure.
Ex
istin
g RM
site
s sh
ould
be
prot
ecte
d fr
om d
evel
opm
ent t
o en
sure
ope
ratio
ns c
ontin
ue.
Com
men
ts n
oted
.
Coun
cil n
eeds
to b
e w
ary
of u
sing
CIL
fund
s to
sup
port
co
mm
erci
al e
nter
pris
es e
spec
ially
with
rega
rd to
sta
te a
id ru
les
.In a
ccor
danc
e w
ith C
IL g
uida
nce
it is
ulti
mat
ely
the
Coun
cil’s
de
cisi
on to
prio
ritis
e ho
w C
IL fu
ndin
g w
ill b
e us
ed to
sup
port
es
sent
ial i
nfra
stru
ctur
e su
ch a
s ed
ucat
ion
prov
isio
n.
The
pote
ntia
l for
S10
6 ob
ligat
ions
will
be
scal
ed b
ack
as a
resu
lt of
the
CIL
Regu
latio
ns
Site
spe
cifi c
issu
es a
nd n
eeds
can
be
addr
esse
d th
roug
h th
e lia
ison
with
the
Coun
cil.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 9
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
5A
ng
ela
Ge
mm
ill
Ma
rin
e
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
Org
an
isa
tio
n
No
Com
men
ts to
mak
e on
the
CIL
cons
ulta
tion
Not
ed
PD
CS
6A
ma
nd
a A
nd
ers
on
NH
S E
ng
lan
d
(Le
ice
ste
rsh
ire
&
Lin
coln
)
The
form
er P
rimar
y Ca
re T
rust
s in
Lei
cest
ersh
ire &
Rut
land
cea
sed
to e
xist
from
Apr
il 20
13, w
ith re
spon
sibi
litie
s be
ing
take
n ov
er b
y Cl
inic
al C
omm
issi
onin
g G
roup
s.H
ousi
ng g
row
th in
City
will
impa
ct o
n pr
imar
y he
alth
car
e in
fras
truc
ture
pro
visi
on a
nd n
ote
that
hea
lthca
re is
not
incl
uded
in
the
PDCS
.Th
e im
plic
atio
ns o
f hou
sing
gro
wth
on
heal
th c
are
need
to b
e co
nsid
ered
, with
cle
ar re
ason
s fo
r the
abs
ence
of h
ealth
care
in
the
PDCS
The
City
Cou
ncil
is a
war
e of
the
rece
nt re
stru
ctur
ing
of h
ealth
ca
re p
rovi
sion
in th
e Ci
ty.
The
Core
Str
ateg
y ev
iden
ce re
cogn
ises
hea
lth c
are
need
s in
gr
owth
are
as.
The
CIL
infr
astr
uctu
re li
st in
clud
es p
roje
cts
that
are
can
dida
tes
to
be fu
nded
by
CIL.
The
Cou
ncil
reco
gnis
es th
e ne
w c
omm
issi
onin
g st
ruct
ure
for t
he N
HS
and
will
dis
cuss
hea
lth in
fras
truc
ture
in
unde
rtak
ing
wor
k on
the
new
Loc
al P
lan.
PD
CS
7M
ari
an
ne
La
ne
Th
urc
ast
on
&
Cro
pst
on
Pa
rish
C
ou
nc
il
How
CIL
app
lies
to C
harn
woo
d Bo
roug
h Co
unci
lTh
e Ci
ty C
ounc
il ha
s ex
plai
ned
that
the
Leic
este
r CIL
will
app
ly to
th
e Ci
ty -
with
in th
e ci
ty b
ound
ary
and
does
not
impa
ct o
n th
e Pa
rish
Coun
cil.
Char
nwoo
d BC
will
invo
lve
them
as
appr
opria
te.
PD
CS
8S
am
an
tha
Pin
no
ck
H
igh
wa
ys
Ag
en
cy
Supp
ort C
ounc
ils a
ppro
ach
in th
e dr
aft R
egul
atio
n 12
3 Li
st to
se
ekin
g pl
anni
ng o
blig
atio
ns in
acc
orda
nce
with
CIL
Reg
s an
d us
e of
con
ditio
ns w
here
app
ropr
iate
.Ac
know
ledg
e th
e po
tent
ial f
undi
ng g
ap fo
r CIL
infr
astr
uctu
re
proj
ects
and
wel
com
e Ci
ty’s
inte
ntio
n to
intr
oduc
e CI
L.N
o co
mm
ents
on
viab
ility
ass
umpt
ions
, met
hodo
logy
, CIL
rate
s ,c
harg
ing
zone
s or
inst
alm
ent p
olic
y .
Com
men
ts a
nd s
uppo
rt n
oted
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION10
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
9M
ark
Wh
ite
En
gli
sh H
eri
tag
e
Ove
rall
no o
bjec
tion
to th
e PD
CS. I
mpo
rtan
t to
ensu
re th
at C
IL
char
ge d
oes
not h
ave
adve
rse
eff e
ct o
n pr
otec
tion
of h
erita
ge
asse
ts.
In c
erta
in c
onte
xt it
may
be
appr
opria
te to
con
side
r exe
mpt
ions
or
dis
cret
iona
ry re
lief f
rom
CIL
whe
re a
her
itage
ass
et is
und
er
thre
at. U
rge
the
Coun
cil t
o re
serv
e th
e rig
ht to
off e
r CIL
relie
f in
cert
ain
case
s w
hich
aff e
ct a
sset
s.N
ote
that
the
Regu
latio
n 12
3 Li
st in
clud
es tr
ansp
ort c
orrid
or
wor
ks, C
ity C
entr
e tr
ansp
ort l
inka
ges
and
Ope
n Sp
ace.
Fun
ding
sh
ould
be
com
plem
enta
ry to
her
itage
and
his
toric
env
ironm
ent
in th
ese
area
sCo
unci
l doc
umen
ts s
houl
d co
nfi rm
that
her
itage
ass
ets
shou
ld
for t
he p
rese
nt, b
e el
igib
le fo
r S10
6 co
ntrib
utio
ns.
Com
men
ts n
oted
. Co
unci
l has
a s
tron
g su
ite o
f pol
icie
s to
pro
tect
her
itage
ass
ets
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e N
PPF.
The
CIL
has
not b
een
set t
o th
e lim
it of
dev
elop
men
t via
bilit
y. It
is
cons
ider
ed th
at th
e ra
te w
ill n
ot im
pact
on
herit
age
asse
ts.
As
note
d in
the
draf
t R12
3 Li
st p
lann
ing
oblig
atio
ns w
ill b
e so
ught
whe
re a
ppro
pria
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
CIL
Reg
ulat
ions
. Th
e re
vise
d sc
hedu
le w
ill s
et o
ut th
e ex
cept
iona
l circ
umst
ance
s pr
oced
ures
.Th
e Co
unci
l will
con
tinue
to s
eek
S106
con
trib
utio
ns in
ac
cord
ance
with
the
Regu
latio
ns
PD
CS
10
M
ich
ae
l L
am
be
rtL
eic
est
ers
hir
e
Po
lice
Mee
ting
requ
ired
with
Cou
ncil
to d
iscu
ss o
vera
ll Po
lice
infr
astr
uctu
re re
quire
men
ts.
Conc
erns
that
CIL
will
not
be
able
to d
eliv
er M
ansfi
eld
Hou
se to
se
rve
the
SRA
.Q
uest
ion
how
up
to d
ate
infr
astr
uctu
re p
lann
ing
in re
latio
n to
gr
owth
in th
e Ci
ty is
?Po
lice
infr
astr
uctu
re n
eeds
upd
atin
g an
d ag
reem
ent o
n w
hat C
IL
will
be
spen
t on
and
how
Pol
icin
g ne
eds
will
be
met
thro
ugh
CIL
Dia
logu
e ne
eded
on
cont
ribut
ion
CIL
will
mak
e in
City
and
up
date
d vi
abili
ty a
naly
sis
to ta
ke in
to a
ccou
nt h
ow C
IL w
ould
co
ntrib
ute
over
the
S106
regi
me
The
City
Cou
ncil
high
light
ed c
olle
ctiv
e lia
ison
with
the
Polic
e at
the
sub
regi
onal
leve
l , a
nd th
e na
ture
and
ext
ent o
f Pol
ice
requ
irem
ents
. The
two
mai
n ‘b
lock
s’ of
Pol
ice
need
s ar
e th
e ce
ntra
l reg
ener
atio
n ar
ea a
nd A
shto
n G
reen
.M
ansfi
eld
Hou
se to
cat
er fo
r gro
wth
in th
e ce
ntra
l are
a ha
s be
en
incl
uded
in th
e R1
23 L
ist b
ased
on
the
evid
ence
in th
e Co
re
Stra
tegy
. The
Cou
ncil
is a
lso
wor
king
with
the
Polic
e on
nee
ds o
n th
e fi r
st p
hase
of t
he A
shto
n G
reen
dev
elop
men
t whi
ch is
not
su
bjec
t to
the
CIL.
Giv
en th
e lim
ited
pote
ntia
l CIL
fund
ing,
the
Coun
cil w
ill s
eek
to
prio
ritis
e th
e in
fras
truc
ture
that
cou
ld b
e el
igib
le fo
r CIL
fund
ing.
Th
e CI
L In
fras
truc
ture
Lis
t in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e CI
L gu
idan
ce
is d
irect
ly d
eriv
ed fr
om th
e Co
re S
trat
egy
to s
how
a fu
ndin
g ga
p an
d pr
ojec
ts e
ligib
le fo
r CIL
fund
ing.
Som
e pr
ojec
ts s
uch
as
educ
atio
n ne
eds
in th
e re
gene
ratio
n ar
ea h
ave
been
revi
ewed
an
d up
date
d to
refl e
ct th
e sl
ow ra
te o
f dev
elop
men
t ( e
g th
e re
quire
men
t for
two
scho
ols
as b
een
redu
ced
to o
ne )
The
Coun
cil h
as u
pdat
ed it
s vi
abili
ty s
tudy
and
has
set
out
in it
s R1
23 L
ist h
ow S
106
‘s w
ill a
pply
.
PD
CS
11
Ro
se F
ree
ma
nT
he
Th
ea
tre
s T
rust
Cultu
ral i
nfra
stru
ctur
e sh
ould
be
liste
d as
par
t of t
he R
123
List
Char
ging
Sch
edul
e sh
ould
spe
cify
that
all
othe
r dev
elop
men
ts
will
hav
e a
nil r
ate
Com
men
ts n
oted
. Th
e R1
23 li
sts
the
infr
astr
uctu
re th
at m
ay b
e fu
nded
by
CIL.
Th
e Co
unci
l will
con
side
r whe
ther
the
Dra
ft S
ched
ule
can
be
amen
ded
to s
tate
that
all
othe
r use
s w
ill n
ot b
e ch
arge
d.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 11
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
12
R
osl
yn
De
em
ing
Na
tura
l E
ng
lan
d
View
CIL
as
play
ing
an im
port
ant r
ole
in th
e st
rate
gic
appr
oach
to
prov
idin
g fo
r bi d
iver
sity
and
gre
en in
fras
truc
ture
.W
elco
me
the
incl
usio
n of
str
ateg
ic g
reen
infr
astr
uctu
re p
roje
cts
in th
e Co
unci
l’s C
IL.
Com
men
ts n
oted
.
PD
CS
13
Ge
off
Pla
tts
En
vir
on
me
nt
Ag
en
cy
The
Dra
ft R
123
List
con
tain
s pe
rcen
tage
spl
it in
fund
ing
appe
ars
to b
e to
o he
avily
wei
ghte
d in
favo
ur o
f tra
nspo
rt .
The
good
wor
k in
par
tner
ship
that
has
bee
n un
dert
aken
bet
wee
n th
e Co
unci
l and
the
Envi
ronm
ent A
genc
y on
fl oo
d ris
k sh
ould
be
mor
e op
enly
sup
port
ed.
The
tran
spor
t inf
rast
ruct
ure
in th
e CI
L In
fras
truc
ture
list
refl e
ct
the
sche
mes
requ
ired
to s
uppo
rt g
row
th a
nd th
e po
tent
ial c
osts
of
thes
e sc
hem
es.
The
Coun
cil h
as w
orke
d cl
osel
y w
ith th
e En
viro
nmen
t Age
ncy
and
will
con
tinue
to d
o so
.
PD
CS
14
An
dre
w C
ha
tte
nH
ori
zo
ns
–
on
be
ha
lf o
f L
eic
est
ers
hir
e
Pa
rtn
ers
hip
NH
S
Tru
st,
Un
ive
rsit
y
Ho
spit
als
of
Le
ice
ste
r N
HS
Tru
stL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
CG
Hea
lth c
are
shou
ld b
e ap
prop
riate
ly re
cogn
ised
in C
IL
cons
ulta
tion
Hea
lthca
re a
ssum
ptio
ns b
ased
on
2010
Cor
e St
rate
gy a
re o
ut o
f da
te.
Hor
izon
s w
ould
wel
com
e op
port
unity
to p
rese
nt n
ew e
vide
nce
to in
form
CIL
pol
icy
in th
e fu
ture
Fi
nal C
IL s
ched
ule,
R12
3 Li
st a
nd L
ocal
Pla
n sh
ould
take
acc
ount
of
hea
lth in
fras
truc
ture
CIL
Infr
astr
uctu
re L
ist i
dent
ifi es
a fu
ndin
g ga
p an
d ca
ndid
ates
for
CIL
fund
ing
base
d on
the
Core
Str
ateg
y.Co
unci
l is
awar
e of
the
rece
nt c
hang
es in
hea
lth p
rovi
sion
and
co
mm
issi
onin
g. T
he L
ocal
Pla
n w
ill p
rovi
de th
e op
port
unity
to
enga
ge in
an
upda
te o
n he
alth
infr
astr
uctu
re.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION12
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
15
An
dre
w P
iatt
G
ate
ley
LL
P
On
be
ha
lf
of
Le
ice
ste
r U
niv
ers
ity
Prop
osal
to c
harg
e st
uden
t hal
ls o
f res
iden
ce h
as n
o em
piric
al o
r po
licy
basi
s an
d ar
e ak
in to
aff o
rdab
le h
ousi
ng£1
00 s
qm. C
IL ra
te is
arb
itrar
y. S
tude
nt a
ccom
mod
atio
n fu
lfi ls
an
edu
catio
n pu
rpos
e, n
ot c
omm
erci
al a
nd w
ill im
pact
on
Uni
vers
ity’s
abili
ty to
pro
vide
stu
dent
acc
omm
odat
ion.
Vi
abili
ty s
tudy
doe
s no
t jus
tify
char
ge. U
nive
rsity
ow
ned
land
s sh
ould
be
excl
uded
from
cha
rgin
g zo
nes.
Stud
ent r
ate
impo
ses
fi nan
cial
bur
den
on U
nive
rsity
Inst
alm
ents
pol
icy
is w
elco
med
: a lo
nger
tim
esca
le s
houl
d be
per
mitt
ed w
ith e
arlie
st p
aym
ent r
equi
red
12 m
onth
s fr
om
com
men
cem
ent,
with
pha
sing
aft
er.
Uni
vers
ity b
road
ly w
elco
mes
R12
3. F
ollo
win
g sh
ould
be
adde
d to
lis
t:a.
Enh
ance
acc
ess
from
the
railw
ay s
tatio
n Lo
ndon
Roa
d to
U
nive
rsity
Roa
d;b.
Impr
ove
pede
stria
n an
d cy
clin
g co
nnec
tions
bet
wee
n U
nive
rsity
Roa
d an
d th
e U
nive
rsity
’s m
ain
site
;c.
Rat
iona
lisat
ion
of th
e ju
nctio
n of
Wel
ford
Roa
d an
d U
nive
rsity
Ro
ad to
at l
east
ena
ble
publ
ic tr
ansp
ort t
o tu
rn ri
ght a
t thi
s ju
nctio
nd.
Impr
ove
pede
stria
n an
d cy
clin
g co
nnec
tions
bet
wee
n Fr
eem
en's
Com
mon
hou
ses
and
Nix
on C
ourt
, Put
ney
Road
, W
elfo
rd R
oad
and
Uni
vers
ity R
oad;
e. Im
prov
e pe
dest
rian,
cyc
ling
and
publ
ic tr
ansp
ort c
onne
ctio
ns
from
Oad
by s
tude
nt v
illag
e to
Vic
toria
Par
k an
d U
nive
rsity
Roa
d.
The
Coun
cil h
as s
et th
e ra
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
viab
ility
ev
iden
ce. T
he ra
te h
as b
een
chec
ked
in th
e vi
abili
ty u
pdat
e w
hich
has
con
fi rm
ed th
at it
will
not
thre
aten
the
deliv
ery
of th
e Pl
an .
Oth
er lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s w
ith s
tude
nt a
ccom
mod
atio
n ar
e ch
argi
ng th
e ap
prop
riate
rate
s fo
r the
ir re
spec
tive
area
.
The
Coun
cil w
elco
mes
the
com
men
ts o
n th
e in
stal
men
ts p
olic
y,
and
has
revi
sed
its in
stal
men
ts p
olic
y to
ext
end
paym
ent c
ycle
s.
The
Coun
cil n
otes
the
com
men
ts re
latin
g to
the
R123
Lis
t. Th
e lis
t co
ntai
ns s
usta
inab
le tr
ansp
ort l
inka
ges
betw
een
the
City
Cen
tre
and
adja
cent
are
as to
sup
port
resi
dent
ial /
em
ploy
men
t gro
wth
as
wel
l as
impr
oved
con
nect
ivity
to tr
ansp
ort h
ubs
PD
CS
16
Ne
il G
old
smit
hN
ath
an
iel
Lic
hfi
eld
&
Pa
rtn
ers
Com
men
ts o
n be
half
of L
ondo
n M
etric
– o
wne
rs o
f St.
Mar
gare
t’s
Reta
il Pa
rk, D
evon
shire
Roa
d.
Viab
ility
stu
dy o
ut o
f dat
e. A
gree
with
CIL
set
ting
stra
tegy
, and
to
set C
IL w
ell w
ithin
mar
gins
of v
iabi
lity.
Reta
il w
areh
ouse
levy
cha
rge
of £
150
is to
o hi
gh a
nd w
ill
disc
oura
ge in
vest
men
t and
will
adv
erse
ly a
ff ect
sch
eme
viab
ility
. Th
is ra
te s
houl
d be
re c
onsi
dere
d.
The
Coun
cil w
elco
mes
the
com
men
ts o
n th
e CI
L se
ttin
g st
rate
gy.
The
viab
ility
stu
dy h
as b
een
upda
ted
and
has
re -
test
ed th
e re
tail
rate
s .T
he e
vide
nce
confi
rms
that
the
reta
il ra
tes
are
viab
le a
nd
appr
opria
te.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 13
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
17
Mic
ha
el
Da
vis
S
av
ills
O
n b
eh
alf
of
Ba
rra
tt H
om
es.
Viab
ility
stu
dy o
ut o
f dat
eW
hils
t the
Cor
e St
rate
gy is
in p
lace
, unf
ortu
nate
that
pub
licat
ion
of C
IL d
oes
not r
un w
ith p
ublic
atio
n of
Loc
al P
lan
CIL
shou
ld b
e su
bjec
t to
revi
ew p
rior t
o ad
optio
n of
new
Loc
al
Plan
In s
ome
loca
tions
the
CIL
rate
with
pol
icy
cost
s w
ill re
nder
som
e sc
hem
es u
nvia
ble-
esp
ecia
lly s
ite ty
pe 6
and
aff o
rdab
le h
ousi
ng
targ
ets,
used
as
the
basi
s fo
r the
resi
dent
ial r
ate.
Aff o
rdab
le h
ousi
ng m
etho
dolo
gy n
eeds
revi
sing
Viab
ility
stu
dy m
etho
dolo
gy n
eeds
revi
sing
. £25
sq.m
rate
is n
ot
appr
opria
teA
R12
3 Li
st h
as n
ot b
een
subm
itted
as
part
of t
he c
onsu
ltatio
n.M
ore
deta
iled
anal
ysis
and
info
rmat
ion
on S
106
need
edCo
unci
l sho
uld
prov
ide
deta
ils o
f how
‘ pay
men
t in
kind
‘ wou
ld
oper
ate
for i
nfra
stru
ctur
e pr
ovis
ion
LCC
shou
ld h
ave
a cl
ear r
evie
w m
echa
nism
– w
ith s
ix m
onth
ly
mon
itorin
g
The
Coun
cil h
as u
pdat
ed th
e Vi
abili
ty s
tudy
to ta
ke in
to a
ccou
nt
chan
ges
in p
rices
and
cos
ts, a
nd c
hang
es in
the
CIL
Regu
latio
ns,
and
guid
ance
. The
upd
ate
has
also
ass
esse
d th
e vi
abili
ty te
st
and
assu
mpt
ions
aro
und
land
val
ue a
nd c
ompe
titiv
e re
turn
and
aff
ord
able
hou
sing
met
hodo
logy
.
The
Coun
cil h
as a
lread
y un
dert
aken
the
PDCS
con
sulta
tion
and
wou
ld li
ke to
ado
pt C
IL b
y Ju
ne 2
015
so
that
CIL
fund
s ca
n be
gin
to c
ontr
ibut
e to
war
ds th
e fu
ndin
g of
infr
astr
uctu
re .
A p
aral
lel
path
with
the
Loca
l Pla
n w
ill c
ause
con
side
rabl
e de
lay.
The
Coun
cil c
onsi
ders
that
its
evid
ence
bas
e –
base
d on
the
Core
St
rate
gy is
app
ropr
iate
and
rele
vant
, an
d re
mai
ns a
sou
nd b
asis
fo
r pro
ceed
ing
with
the
CIL.
A R
egul
atio
n 12
3 Li
st w
as is
sued
as
part
of t
he P
DCS
con
sulta
tion.
Th
is a
lso
incl
uded
a s
tate
men
t of t
he a
ppro
ach
to S
106
cont
ribut
ions
.
Addi
tiona
l S10
6 in
form
atio
n w
hich
pre
sent
s fi g
ures
for S
106
per
dwel
ling
have
bee
n pr
ovid
ed. T
he A
ff ord
able
Hou
sing
tabl
es h
ave
been
upd
ated
to s
how
the
sche
mes
sup
port
ed b
y H
CA fu
ndin
g.
The
Coun
cil w
ill c
onsi
der ‘
paym
ent i
n ki
nd ‘ i
n lin
e w
ith th
e CI
L Re
gula
tions
.
The
Coun
cil i
nten
ds to
revi
ew C
IL w
hen
hous
e pr
ices
cha
nge
by
ten
perc
ent.
The
Coun
cil w
ill u
nder
take
the
appr
opria
te a
nnua
l mon
itorin
g of
CI
L
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION14
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
18
Ric
ha
rd B
en
ne
ttC
ha
rnw
oo
d
Bo
rou
gh
Co
un
cil
Ther
e sh
ould
be
a ch
arge
of £
10 s
q.m
in th
e SR
ATh
ere
appe
ars
to b
e si
gnifi
cant
dev
elop
men
t via
bilit
y fo
r re
side
ntia
l dev
elop
men
t in
the
rest
of t
he C
ity. £
25sq
.m a
ppea
rs
to b
e lo
w. A
cha
rge
of £
45 -5
0 ca
n be
just
ifi ed
. The
low
rate
doe
s no
t off e
r roo
m fo
r neg
otia
tion
if de
velo
pers
obj
ect t
o th
e ra
te.
A lo
wer
CIL
cha
rge
coul
d ha
ve c
onsi
dera
ble
impa
ct fo
r Ch
arnw
ood
shou
ld it
hav
e a
high
er C
IL ra
te, e
spec
ially
for
deve
lopm
ent s
ites
clos
e to
the
boun
dary
The
inst
alm
ents
pol
icy
appe
ars
reas
onab
le.
R123
Lis
t doe
s no
t con
tain
soc
ial/c
omm
unity
infr
astr
uctu
re s
uch
as h
ealth
. Will
this
be
cove
red
by S
106
oblig
atio
ns?
CIL
rate
s ha
ve b
een
set o
n ro
bust
via
bilit
y ev
iden
ce, r
efl e
ctin
g si
te
typo
logi
es a
nd a
bilit
y of
site
s to
sus
tain
a C
IL c
harg
e. T
he C
ounc
il ha
s up
date
d th
e vi
abili
ty s
tudy
whi
ch h
as c
onfi r
med
the
rate
for
the
rege
nera
tion
area
.
The
resi
dent
ial r
ate
is a
ppro
pria
te a
nd e
vide
nced
for t
he ty
pe o
f de
velo
pmen
t pro
pose
d in
the
City
. The
Cou
ncil
has
not s
et th
is
rate
arb
itrar
ily a
nd d
oes
unde
rsta
nd th
e ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r a £
45 -5
0 pe
r sq.
m ra
te p
ropo
sed
by C
harn
woo
d Bo
roug
h Co
unci
l.
The
Coun
cil h
as n
ot d
isre
gard
ed s
ocia
l inf
rast
ruct
ure
and
has
care
fully
con
side
red
the
R123
Lis
t to
just
ify a
fund
ing
gap
for C
IL.
PD
CS
19
Cg
MS
Co
nsu
ltin
g
On
be
ha
lf o
f H
am
me
rso
ns
PL
C
Ham
mer
sons
sup
port
the
curr
ent a
ppro
ach
to C
IL w
ith re
gard
to
com
paris
on re
tail
deve
lopm
ent a
nd th
e £0
rate
Cons
ider
s th
at th
e pr
opos
ed C
IL ra
tes
are
appr
opria
te to
ens
ure
the
cont
inue
d vi
abili
ty o
f ret
ail d
evel
opm
ent i
n th
e ci
ty c
entr
e
The
Coun
cil w
elco
mes
and
sup
port
s th
e st
atem
ent b
y H
amm
erso
ns.
PD
CS
20
P
ea
coc
k a
nd
Sm
ith
O
n b
eh
alf
of
Mo
rris
on
s
Stro
ngly
obj
ect t
o pr
opos
ed re
tail
rate
. The
£15
0 sq
.m fo
r co
nven
ienc
e an
d re
tail
war
ehou
ses
will
hav
e a
sign
ifi ca
nt a
dver
se
impa
ct o
n vi
abili
ty o
f fut
ure
larg
e sc
ale
reta
il de
velo
pmen
t, es
peci
ally
whe
n ta
ken
into
acc
ount
with
oth
er in
fras
truc
ture
co
sts.
Dis
agre
e w
ith d
iff er
entia
l rat
es w
ithin
sam
e U
se C
lass
with
no
char
ge fo
r oth
er fo
rm o
f ret
ail d
evel
opm
ent.
Puts
con
veni
ence
an
d re
tail
war
ehou
ses
at s
igni
fi can
t dis
adva
ntag
e.
See
resp
onse
to P
DCS
16.
Diff
eren
tial r
ates
can
onl
y be
set
with
re
gard
to v
iabi
lity.
The
Coun
cil h
as u
pdat
ed th
e vi
abili
ty s
tudy
, w
hich
als
o ta
kes
acco
unt t
he v
iabi
lity
of s
mal
ler d
isco
unt s
tore
s. Th
e Co
unci
l con
side
rs th
e re
tail
rate
s ap
prop
riate
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e ev
iden
ce.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 15
Re
spo
nd
en
t S
um
ma
ry o
f R
esp
on
seL
eic
est
er
Cit
y C
ou
nc
il R
esp
on
se /
Ac
tio
n
PD
CS
21
Fra
n R
ow
ley
T
url
ey
O
n b
eh
alf
of
De
Mo
ntf
ort
U
niv
ers
ity
.
Prop
osed
stu
dent
acc
omm
odat
ion
rate
is h
igh
com
pare
d to
com
mer
cial
hot
el s
pace
and
oth
er fo
rms
of re
side
ntia
l ac
com
mod
atio
n an
d w
ill re
stric
t con
stru
ctio
n of
new
stu
dent
ac
com
mod
atio
nAv
erag
e ch
arge
for s
tude
nt fl
ats
arou
nd th
e co
untr
y is
£70
sq.m
Viab
ility
ass
umpt
ions
on
stud
ent h
ousi
ng s
houl
d be
ver
ifi ed
by
key
prov
ider
s su
ch a
s D
e M
ontf
ort U
nive
rsity
Stud
ent H
ousi
ng d
oes
not f
orm
par
t of t
he C
ore
Stra
tegy
hou
sing
la
nd re
quire
men
t, an
d is
not
link
ed to
requ
irem
ents
in th
e R1
23
List
, and
ther
efor
e lim
ited
just
ifi ca
tion
for D
MU
con
trib
utin
g to
in
fras
truc
ture
.D
MU
is a
cha
rity
and
shou
ld b
e ex
empt
from
the
char
ge .
Coun
cil
shou
ld c
onfi r
m th
at a
ccom
mod
atio
n pu
rpos
e bu
ilt b
y D
MU
for
stud
ents
of t
he U
nive
rsity
sho
uld
be e
xem
pt.
Clar
ifi ca
tion
on a
pply
ing
the
CIL
levy
to s
tude
nt fl
ats
with
in th
e SR
A a
nd o
utsi
de. S
tude
nt a
ccom
mod
atio
n w
ithin
SRA
sho
uld
not
be c
harg
ed a
s w
ith re
side
ntia
l use
.
See
also
resp
onse
to P
DCS
15.
The
Coun
cil c
onsi
ders
the
stud
ent a
ccom
mod
atio
n ra
te to
be
appr
opria
te in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
viab
ility
evi
denc
e.
Exam
ples
of o
ther
aut
horit
ies
char
ging
for s
tude
nt h
ousi
ng :
Ch
arg
ing
Au
tho
rity
Sta
ge
Ra
te (
£/s
q.m
.)
Po
rtsm
ou
thCh
argi
ng10
5
Ox
ford
Char
ging
100
Bri
sto
lCh
argi
ng10
0
Hu
nti
ng
do
nsh
ire
Char
ging
85
Ply
mo
uth
Char
ging
60
Ex
ete
rCh
argi
ng40
Stud
ent A
ccom
mod
atio
n do
es fo
rm p
art o
f the
Cor
e St
rate
gy
hous
ing
requ
irem
ent a
nd it
is th
eref
ore
appr
opria
te fo
r it t
o co
ntrib
ute
to in
fras
truc
ture
nee
ds.
The
Coun
cil n
otes
the
char
itabl
e st
atus
of U
nive
rsiti
es. T
he
Coun
cil c
onsi
ders
that
ther
e sh
ould
not
be
a ‘b
lank
et re
lief’
on
stud
ent h
ousi
ng. T
he m
ajor
ity o
f dev
elop
men
ts fo
r stu
dent
ho
usin
g ar
e fr
om p
rivat
e de
velo
pers
, an
d th
e Co
unci
l has
re
ceiv
ed o
nly
one
appl
icat
ion
for s
tude
nt h
ousi
ng fr
om
the
Uni
vers
ity o
f Lei
cest
er in
the
last
eig
ht y
ears
. Giv
en th
e re
quire
men
t to
keep
the
CIL
char
ging
sch
edul
e as
str
aigh
tfor
war
d as
pos
sibl
e, th
ere
is n
o cl
ear e
vide
nce
to th
at th
e nu
mbe
r of
sche
mes
like
ly to
com
e fo
rwar
d is
suffi
cie
nt to
just
ify a
sep
arat
e CI
L ch
arge
for d
evel
opm
ent b
y th
e U
nive
rsity
The
Viab
ility
ass
essm
ent h
as ta
ken
acco
unt o
f stu
dent
hou
sing
vi
abili
ty w
ithin
the
Stra
tegi
c Re
gene
ratio
n A
rea.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION16
5th July 2012 and 11th December 2012 Organisations and individuals invited to consultation events
Aldi (WYG) AMEC Andrew Granger Andrew Martin Associates Barrratt Developments Bloor Homes Capita Symonds Clifton Homes David Morley David Thompson Davidsons East Midlands Housing Association Gazeley HCA Indigo Planning (Sainsbury's) Jamie Lewis Residential (Student) John Cawrey Lambert Smith Hampton LHA-ASRA (RP) Longhurst Group Lovells Lucas Land and Planning Marrons Mather Jamie Miller Homes National Housing Federation NCHA Newark & Sherwood DC Norman Tomson Sorth Northants JPU Nuneaton & Bedworth BC Pegasus Planning Penwise Property (Own Grove Park) Mike Barton Persimmon homes RGP (Andy Ward) St Modwen Taylor Wimpey William Davis Wilson Bowden Ainscough Strategic Land Alan Finch Ancer Spa Andrew and Ashwell Andrew Twigg APB Asda Barwood Land Bellway Homes Blueprint
British Property Federation Cancer Research (land owner/promoter NWLDC) Commercial Estates Corby Country Landowners Association Crest Nicholson CSB Group East Northants EE Lane Erewash BC Fisher German Fosse Park North Framework HA Freeth Cartwright Geoff Prince Gleeson Homes Goodman Hazelton Homes Henry Boot House Builders Federation How Planning Iceni Projects Innes England Intali James Richardson James Sellicks Jelson Homes Joe Breslin Landmark planning Leics CC Lichfield DC Lidl Magna Park/Gazeley Matt; McCarthy and Stone Melton BC Estates Midland Heart (Housing Association) Morris Homes Morrisons Nick Jackson North Northants JPU North Warks DC NWLDC Estates Opal Group (Student) Oxalis Planning Peter Willmot Peterborough CC Phil Baildon Phillip Heath
Appendix 1: Consultation Workshops 5th July 2012 - 11th December 2012
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 17
Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study January 2013
Raynsway Redrow Richard Jones Robert Weighton Robin Taylo Ross Thain Rugby BC Rushcliffe BC Sainsbury’s Savills Signet Planning South Derbys BC South Kesteven DC
Spire Homes SSR Planning Stephan Lucas Tesco Tim Ellison) Tony Ansell, Rutland Planning Waitrose Waterloo West Northants JPU Westleigh WYG (Colin Sheilds)
5th July 2012 Organisations and individuals that accepted invitations to consultation event
Aldi (WYG) AMEC Andrew Granger Andrew Martin Associates Barrratt Developments Bloor Homes Capita Symonds Clifton Homes David Morley David Thompson Davidsons East Midlands Housing Association Gazeley HCA Indigo Planning (Sainsbury's) Jamie Lewis Residential John Cawrey Lambert Smith Hampton LHA-ASRA Longhurst Group
Lovells Lucas Land and Planning Marrons Mather Jamie Miller Homes National Housing Federation NCHA Newark & Sherwood DC Norman Tomson Sorth Northants JPU Nuneaton & Bedworth BC Pegasus Planning Penwise Property, Mike Barton Persimmon homes RGPSt Modwen Taylor Wimpey William Davis Wilson Bowden
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION18
Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study January 2013
11th December 2012 Organisations and individuals that accepted invitations to consultation event
Stuart Ashton Harworth Estates Philip Baildon Building Consultant x Dorothy Barratt North Warks DC x Neil Bloomfield Clifton Homes x Elle Cass Jones Lang LaSalle Carrick Casson-Crook Barratts x James Bompass Iceni Projects x John Coleman William Davis x Jonathon Collins Henry Boot x Lauren Culbert Persimmon Homes x Edward Dade Northants DC x Brian Mullin Marrons x
Kelly Ford Nuneaton & Bedworth DC
Tom Harrison Brown & Co x David Hearsum Uppingham School x John Henderson Longhurst Group x Catherine Hewitt NCHA x Wendy Hurst Lidl x Guy Longley Pegasus Planning x Stephen Lucas Lucas Land and Planning Chris May Marrons x Rebecca Mitchell Barwood Jim Patman EMHG x Melys Pritchett Savills x Luke Simmons Persimmon Homes x Gareth Staff DWH Andrew Tildesley Taylor Wimpey x Richard Wain Hawksmoor x Tim Walton Loughborough University x David Wilkinson Architecture.com x John Cawrey Cawrey Ltd x David Walgate Cawrey Ltd x
(Note – Attendees marked ‘x’)
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 19
Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study January 2013
2. Slides Consultation events 5th July 2012
Consultation events - presentation slides
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION20
07/11/20
12 1
5th
July
201
2
Leic
este
r, Le
ices
ters
hire
and
Rut
land
CIL
Via
bilit
y St
udy
Firs
t Con
sulta
tion
Even
tA
ssum
ptio
ns, A
ppra
isal
s an
d Fi
ndin
gs
Age
nda
CIL
-W
hat i
s C
IL
Viab
ility
Evi
denc
e–
The
use
of e
vide
nce
–M
ain
Ass
umpt
ions
•H
ouse
Pric
es•
Affo
rdab
le H
ousi
ng•
Non
-resi
dent
ial p
rices
•D
evel
opm
ent c
osts
–Th
e Vi
abili
ty T
est
•D
evel
oper
s pr
ofit
•N
PP
F
Infra
stru
ctur
e E
vide
nce
Em
ergi
ng F
indi
ngs
Oth
er M
atte
rs
Key
issu
es
•H
ow m
uch
–w
ill C
IL d
eter
dev
elop
men
t so
muc
h as
to p
reju
dice
the
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n or
will
the
abse
nce
of C
IL p
reju
dice
the
Dev
elop
men
t Pla
n ?
•W
hen
shou
ld it
be
paya
ble?
Wha
t is
CIL
?Lo
cal a
utho
ritie
s ca
n ch
oose
to c
harg
e on
new
dev
elop
men
ts to
su
ppor
t dev
elop
men
t by
fund
ing
infra
stru
ctur
e.
Mus
t be
fixed
aga
inst
a s
ched
ule
of th
e in
frast
ruct
ure
that
is
requ
ired
to s
uppo
rt ne
w d
evel
opm
ent.
The
loca
l aut
horit
y m
ust s
trike
the
bala
nce
betw
een
dete
rring
de
velo
pmen
t and
rais
ing
CIL
thro
ugh
havi
ng re
gard
to v
iabi
lity
and
deliv
erin
g th
e de
velo
pmen
t pla
n.
The
levy
mus
t be
appr
oved
by
an E
xam
iner
.
In th
e fu
ture
s10
6 co
ntrib
utio
ns w
ill no
t be
able
to b
e ‘p
oole
d’.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 21
07/11/20
12 2
Reg
ulat
ions
5
The
Com
mun
ity In
fras
truc
ture
Lev
y R
egul
atio
ns 2
010
Reg
ulat
ion
14 -
Setti
ng ra
tes
(1)
In s
ettin
g ra
tes
(incl
udin
g di
ffere
ntia
l rat
es) i
n a
char
ging
sch
edul
e, a
cha
rgin
g au
thor
ity
mus
t aim
to s
trike
wha
t app
ears
to th
e ch
argi
ng a
utho
rity
to b
e an
app
ropr
iate
bal
ance
be
twee
n—(a
) th
e de
sira
bilit
y of
fund
ing
from
CIL
(in
who
le o
r in
part)
the
actu
al a
nd e
xpec
ted
estim
ated
tota
l cos
t of i
nfra
stru
ctur
e re
quire
d to
sup
port
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f its
are
a,
taki
ng in
to a
ccou
nt o
ther
act
ual a
nd e
xpec
ted
sour
ces
of fu
ndin
g; a
nd.
(b)
the
pote
ntia
l effe
cts
(take
n as
a w
hole
) of t
he im
posi
tion
of C
IL o
n th
e ec
onom
ic
viab
ility
of d
evel
opm
ent a
cros
s its
are
a..
(2)
In s
ettin
g ra
tes
in a
cha
rgin
g sc
hedu
le, a
cha
rgin
g au
thor
ity m
ay a
lso
have
rega
rd to
act
ual
and
expe
cted
adm
inis
trativ
e ex
pens
es in
con
nect
ion
with
CIL
to th
e ex
tent
that
thos
e ex
pens
es c
an b
e fu
nded
from
CIL
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith re
gula
tion
61.
(3)
In h
avin
g re
gard
to th
e po
tent
ial e
ffect
s of
the
impo
sitio
n of
CIL
on
the
econ
omic
via
bilit
y of
de
velo
pmen
t (in
acc
orda
nce
with
par
agra
ph (1
)(b)),
a L
ondo
n bo
roug
h co
unci
l mus
t tak
e in
to a
ccou
nt th
e ra
tes
set b
y th
e M
ayor
.(4
)Fo
r the
pur
pose
s of
par
agra
ph (3
), th
e ra
tes
set b
y th
e M
ayor
are
the
rate
s in
the
mos
t re
cent
cha
rgin
g sc
hedu
le a
ppro
ved
by th
e M
ayor
bef
ore
the
Lond
on b
orou
gh c
ounc
il be
gins
con
sulta
tion
on it
s pr
elim
inar
y dr
aft c
harg
ing
sche
dule
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
regu
latio
n 15
.
Gui
danc
e (1
) -C
onsu
ltatio
n
6
Sec
tion
206
ofth
eP
lann
ing
Act
2008
(The
Act
)con
fers
the
pow
er
toch
arge
CIL
once
rtain
bodi
eskn
own
asch
argi
ngau
thor
ities
.
The
char
ging
auth
ority
’sre
spon
sibi
litie
s,if
they
deci
deto
levy
CIL
,will
beto
:……
…Th
isw
illin
volv
eco
nsul
tatio
nan
d…
……
Gui
danc
e (7
) -B
alan
ce
7
……
ake
yco
nsid
erat
ion
for
auth
oriti
esis
the
bala
nce
betw
een
secu
ring
addi
tiona
linv
estm
ent
for
infra
stru
ctur
eto
supp
ort
deve
lopm
ent
and
the
pote
ntia
leco
nom
icef
fect
ofim
posi
ngC
ILup
onde
velo
pmen
tacr
oss
thei
r
area
.Th
eC
ILre
gula
tions
plac
eth
isba
lanc
eof
cons
ider
atio
nsat
the
cent
reof
the
char
ge-s
ettin
gpr
oces
s.In
view
ofth
ew
ide
varia
tion
inlo
cal
char
ging
circ
umst
ance
s,it
isfo
rcha
rgin
gau
thor
ities
tode
cide
onth
e
appr
opria
teba
lanc
efo
rth
eir
area
and
‘how
muc
h’po
tent
ial
deve
lopm
ent
they
are
will
ing
topu
tat
risk
thro
ugh
the
impo
sitio
n
ofC
IL.T
heam
ount
will
vary
…..
Gui
danc
e (9
) –C
onsi
sten
t with
E
vide
nce
8
The
inde
pend
ente
xam
iner
shou
ldch
eck
that
:
……
.th
ech
argi
ngau
thor
ity’s
draf
tch
argi
ngsc
hedu
leis
supp
orte
dby
back
grou
nddo
cum
ents
cont
aini
ngap
prop
riate
avai
labl
eev
iden
ce
the
prop
osed
rate
orra
tes
are
info
rmed
byan
dco
nsis
tent
with
,th
eev
iden
ceon
econ
omic
viab
ility
acro
ssth
ech
argi
ng
auth
ority
'sar
ea;a
nd
evid
ence
has
been
prov
ided
that
show
sth
epr
opos
edra
te
wou
ldno
tput
atse
rious
risk
over
alld
evel
opm
ento
fthe
area
.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION22
07/11/20
12 3
Gui
danc
e (1
0) –
Aut
horit
y’s
Bal
ance
9
The
exam
iner
shou
ldno
tus
eth
eC
ILex
amin
atio
nto
ques
tion
ach
argi
ngau
thor
ity’s
choi
cein
term
sof
'the
appr
opria
teba
lanc
e',u
nles
sth
eev
iden
ceav
aila
ble
toth
eex
amin
atio
nsh
ows
that
the
prop
osed
rate
(or
rate
s)w
illpu
tth
eov
eral
ldev
elop
men
tof
the
area
atse
rious
risk.
The
exam
iner
shou
ldbe
read
yto
mod
ifyor
reje
ctth
edr
aft
char
ging
sche
dule
ifit
puts
atse
rious
risk
the
over
alld
evel
opm
ento
fthe
area
.In
cons
ider
ing
whe
ther
the
over
alld
evel
opm
ento
fthe
area
has
been
put
atse
rious
risk,
the
exam
iner
will
wan
tto
cons
ider
the
impl
icat
ions
for
the
prio
ritie
sth
atth
eau
thor
ityha
sid
entif
ied
inits
Dev
elop
men
tPla
n(fo
rex
ampl
epl
anne
dta
rget
sfo
rhou
sing
supp
lyan
daf
ford
able
hous
ing)
,or
inth
eca
seof
the
May
or’s
CIL
,the
impl
icat
ions
for
the
Lond
onP
lan.
Inco
nsid
erin
gw
heth
erth
eD
evel
opm
ent
Pla
nan
dits
targ
ets
have
been
puta
tser
ious
risk,
the
exam
iner
shou
ldon
lybe
conc
erne
dw
ithw
heth
erth
epr
opos
edC
ILra
tew
illm
ake
am
ater
ialo
rsi
gnifi
cant
diffe
renc
eto
the
leve
loft
hatr
isk.
Itm
aybe
that
the
Dev
elop
men
tPla
nan
dits
targ
ets
wou
ldbe
atse
rious
risk
inth
eab
senc
eof
CIL
.
Gui
danc
e (2
3) –
Hig
h Le
vel a
nd
Bro
ad B
rush
10
The
legi
slat
ion
(sec
tion
212
(4)(
b))
requ
ires
ach
argi
ngau
thor
ity
tous
e'a
ppro
pria
teav
aila
ble
evid
ence
'to
info
rmth
eir
draf
t
char
ging
sche
dule
.It
isre
cogn
ised
that
the
avai
labl
eda
tais
unlik
ely
tobe
fully
com
preh
ensi
veor
exha
ustiv
e.C
harg
ing
auth
oriti
esne
edto
dem
onst
rate
that
thei
rpr
opos
edC
ILra
teor
rate
sar
ein
form
edby
‘app
ropr
iate
avai
labl
e’ev
iden
cean
d
cons
iste
ntw
ithth
atev
iden
ceac
ross
thei
rare
aas
aw
hole
.
Gui
danc
e (2
7) –
Evi
denc
e w
ill
info
rm n
ot d
eter
min
e C
IL
11
The
legi
slat
ion
(sec
tion
212
(4)
(b))
only
requ
ires
ach
argi
ngau
thor
ityto
use
appr
opria
teav
aila
ble
evid
ence
to'in
form
the
draf
tch
argi
ng
sche
dule
'.A
char
ging
auth
ority
’spr
opos
edC
ILra
te(o
rra
tes)
shou
ld
appe
arre
ason
able
give
nth
eav
aila
ble
evid
ence
,bu
tth
ere
isno
requ
irem
ent
for
apr
opos
edra
teto
exac
tlym
irror
the
evid
ence
,fo
r
exam
ple,
ifth
eev
iden
cepo
inte
dto
setti
nga
char
gerig
htat
the
mar
gins
ofvi
abili
ty.T
here
isro
omfo
rsom
epr
agm
atis
m.
Viab
ility
Tes
ts
12
CIL
Reg
ulat
ion
14A
sses
s im
pact
of v
iabi
lity
on d
eliv
ery
NPP
FP
lan
deliv
erab
ility
(was
PP
S3
Par
agra
ph 2
9 A
fford
able
Hou
sing
Ta
rget
to b
e br
oadl
y de
liver
able
)SH
LAA
Del
iver
abilit
ySi
te S
peci
fics1
06 n
egot
iatio
ns e
tc
RIC
S G
uida
nce
and
LGA
/HB
F G
uida
nce
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 23
07/11/20
12 4
NP
PF
173
13
Ensu
ring
viab
ility
and
deliv
erab
ility
173.
Pur
suin
gsu
stai
nabl
ede
velo
pmen
tre
quire
sca
refu
lat
tent
ion
tovi
abili
tyan
dco
sts
inpl
an-m
akin
gan
dde
cisi
on-
taki
ng.P
lans
shou
ldbe
deliv
erab
le.T
here
fore
,the
site
san
dth
esc
ale
ofde
velo
pmen
tide
ntifi
edin
the
plan
shou
ldno
tbe
subj
ectt
osu
cha
scal
eof
oblig
atio
nsan
dpo
licy
burd
ens
that
thei
rab
ility
tobe
deve
lope
dvi
ably
isth
reat
ened
.To
ensu
revi
abili
ty,t
heco
sts
ofan
yre
quire
men
tslik
ely
tobe
appl
ied
tode
velo
pmen
t,su
chas
requ
irem
ents
for
affo
rdab
leho
usin
g,st
anda
rds,
infra
stru
ctur
eco
ntrib
utio
nsor
othe
rre
quire
men
tssh
ould
,w
hen
taki
ngac
coun
tof
the
norm
alco
stof
deve
lopm
enta
ndm
itiga
tion,
prov
ide
com
petit
ive
retu
rns
toa
will
ing
land
owne
ran
dw
illin
gde
velo
per
toen
able
the
deve
lopm
entt
obe
deliv
erab
le.
Sta
ndar
d Vi
abili
ty T
est
14
Gro
ss D
evel
opm
ent V
alue
(The
com
bine
d va
lue
of th
e co
mpl
ete
deve
lopm
ent)
LES
S
Cos
t of c
reat
ing
the
asse
t, in
clud
ing
PRO
FIT
(Con
stru
ctio
n +
fees
+ fi
nanc
e ch
arge
s)=
RES
IDU
AL
VALU
ER
esid
ual V
alue
v E
xist
ing
/ Alte
rnat
ive
Use
Val
ue
CIL
–A
dditi
onal
Pro
fit
15
Gro
ss D
evel
opm
ent V
alue
(The
com
bine
d va
lue
of th
e co
mpl
ete
deve
lopm
ent
Incl
udin
g X
% a
fford
able
hou
sing
)
LES
S
Cos
t of c
reat
ing
the
asse
t(la
nd*
+ co
nstru
ctio
n +
fees
+ fi
nanc
e ch
arge
s +
deve
lope
rs p
rofit
)=
Add
ition
al P
rofit
* W
here
‘lan
d’ is
the
Alte
rnat
ive
Use
Val
ue a
nd u
plift
Gro
ss D
evel
opm
ent V
alue
All
inco
me
from
a S
chem
e
Con
stru
ctio
nS
ite R
emed
iatio
nA
bnor
mal
sS
106
Etc
.
Fees
Des
ign
Eng
inee
rS
ales
Etc
.
Prof
itLa
ndow
ner
Dev
elop
ers
Bui
lder
s
Land
Exi
stin
g /
Alte
rnat
ive
Land
Val
ue+
uplif
t
CIL
,Af
ford
able
H
ousi
ng,
envi
rost
anda
rds,
desi
gn, e
tc
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION24
07/11/20
12 5
Mod
ellin
g
17
Res
iden
tial
16 S
ites
Com
mer
cial
Indu
stria
lO
ffice
Stu
dent
Ret
ail
Hot
el
Dev
elop
men
t as
a pr
opor
tion
of
over
all d
evel
opm
ent
18
Aver
age
Hou
se P
rices
1920
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 25
07/11/20
12 6
2122
Reside
ntialpric
esfrom
develope
rapp
raisalsa
ndthewider
eviden
ceba
seC
ounc
ilTy
pe£/
m2
Leic
este
rFl
ats
1,72
2Fl
ats
1,35
6N
W L
eics
Hou
ses
1,91
7H
ouse
s1,
929
Hou
ses
1,83
8N
arbo
roug
hG
en R
es2,
045
Blab
yG
en R
es1,
884
Whe
tsto
neG
en R
es1,
830
Littl
e Th
orpe
Gen
Res
2,04
5C
rosb
yG
en R
es1,
938
Blab
y R
ural
Gen
Res
2,15
3M
elto
nH
ouse
s1,
900
Cha
rnw
ood
Hou
ses
1,53
9H
ouse
s2,
803
Har
boro
ugh
Hou
ses
2,36
8H
ouse
s2,
476
Hou
ses
2,35
5O
adby
and
Wig
ston
Hou
ses
2,10
0H
ouse
s2,
019
Aver
age
Hou
se P
rices
2324
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION26
07/11/20
12 7
App
rais
al P
rices
25
AppraisalV
ariables
byCh
arging
Authority
(£/m
2)Site
1Site
2Site
3Site
4Site
5Site
6Site
7Site
8Site
9Site
10Site
11Site
12Site
13Site
14Site
15Site
16SU
E1
SUE2Greenfie
ld1Greenfie
ld2Greenfie
ld3Br
ownfie
ldrede
v. L
Urban
FlatsBr
ownfie
ldrede
v. M
Med
ium
Brow
nfie ld
Med
ium
greenfiel d
Urban
edge
Town
centre
flats
Exgarage site
Town
Village
Infill
Small
Village
Sche
me
Village
House
BlabyDC
2,00
02,10
01,80
01,65
01,80
02,10
02,10
01,70
01,95
02,00
02,25
02,50
0Ch
arnw
oodBC
2,20
02,30
02,20
02,20
02,30
02,30
01,50
02,25
02,30
02,30
01,80
02,10
02,20
02,40
02,60
0Ha
rborou
ghDC
2,20
02,30
02,20
02,20
02,30
01,80
02,25
02,30
02,30
01,80
02,10
02,20
02,40
02,60
0
Hinckley
andBo
sworth
BC1,90
01,80
02,00
02,20
01,80
01,70
01,65
01,80
02,10
02,10
01,70
01,95
02,00
02,25
02,50
0LeicesterC
C2,20
02,20
02,20
02,20
02,20
01,95
01,80
01,75
01,90
01,80
02,10
01,85
01,95
02,00
02,00
0MeltonBC
2,30
02,30
02,30
01,50
02,25
02,30
02,30
01,80
02,10
02,20
02,40
02,60
0
North
West
Leicestershire
DC1,90
01,80
02,00
02,20
01,85
01,80
01,65
01,75
02,10
02,10
01,70
01,80
02,00
02,10
02,50
0
Oadby
andWigston
DC1,90
01,80
02,00
02,20
01,85
01,80
01,65
01,75
02,10
02,10
01,70
01,80
02,00
02,10
02,50
0Ru
tland
DC2,30
02,20
02,25
02,30
02,30
02,25
02,30
02,30
01,80
02,10
02,20
02,40
02,60
0
Ren
ts, 3
Bed
room
s, £
/mon
th
26
Affo
rdab
le R
ent
27
Ren
t80
%of
med
ian
rent
LHA
Cap
Man
agem
ent
10%
Void
s4%
Rep
airs
6%
Yiel
d5.
25%
(19
YP
)
Affo
rdab
le A
ssum
ptio
ns
28
Soc
ial r
ent
2 be
d67
m2
£60,
000
(£89
5/m
2)3
bed
72m
2£6
7,00
0(£
930/
m2)
Inte
rmed
iate
70%
of m
arke
t val
ue
His
toric
Gra
nt –
Typi
cally
£35
,000
/soc
ial r
ent
Gra
nt, r
ecyc
led
gran
t, R
ight
-to-b
uy re
ceip
ts, S
ocia
l to
affo
rdab
le re
nt c
onve
rsio
ns
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 27
07/11/20
12 8
Affo
rdab
le -
Valu
es
29
Wor
th o
f Affo
rdab
le R
ent
Blaby
Charnwood
Harborough
Hinckley & Bosworth
Leicester
Melton
North West Leics
Oadby & Wigston
Rutland
Priv
ate
Ren
t67
562
575
057
565
060
055
060
062
5Af
ford
able
Ren
t(80
%)
540
500
550
460
520
480
440
480
500
Net
Ren
tPa
5,18
44,
800
5,28
04,
416
4,99
24,
608
4,22
44,
608
4,80
0W
orth
94,2
5587
,273
96,0
0080
,291
90,7
6483
,782
76,8
0083
,782
87,2
73£/
m2
992
919
1,01
184
595
588
280
888
291
9
30
Non
Reside
ntialCa
pitalised
typicalren
ts£/m
2
Rent£/m2
Yield
Capitalised
Rent
£/m2
Largeindu
stria
l41
6.50%
631
Smallind
ustrial
487.50%
640
Largeoffice
936.50
%1,43
1Sm
alloffice
100
7.00
%1,42
9Largeretail
122
5.00
%2,44
0Sm
allRetail
105
7.00
%1,50
0LeicesterS
hops
236
7.00
%3,37
1Other
Shop
s15
011
.00%
1,36
4Ho
tels(per
room
)3,75
06.50
%2,15
0Leisu
re75
8.00
%93
8
Alte
rnat
ive
Use
Val
ue
31
1.A
gric
ultu
ral
£25,
000
/ha
2.Pa
ddoc
k£5
0,00
0 /h
a3.
Res
iden
tial
£500
,000
/ha
4.In
dust
rial
Leic
este
r and
Oad
by&
Wig
ston
£400
,000
/ha
Rem
aind
er £
300,
000/
ha
Dev
elop
men
t Cos
ts
32
1.C
onst
ruct
ion
BC
IS2.
Infr
astr
uctu
re10
% -
20%
3.A
bnor
mal
s15
% B
row
nfie
ld4.
Fees
10%
5.C
ontin
genc
ies
2.5%
& 5
%6.
Add
ition
al s
106
£1,0
00/u
nit (
ALL
)7.
Inte
rest
7%8.
Prof
it20
%
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION28
07/11/20
12 9
Bui
ld R
ates
33
1.B
ase
8 or
9 /
quar
ter
2.La
rge
gree
nfie
ld9
/ qua
rter
3.S
UE
s(p
hase
s)20
/ qu
arte
r4.
Sm
all s
ites
1 / m
onth
34
Affordab
leHo
using
Cou
ncil
Stat
usTa
rget
(s)
Bla
byEm
ergi
ng C
S30
%Si
tes
over
15
in S
UE
25%
Site
s ov
er 1
5 ou
tsid
e SU
EC
harn
woo
dLo
cal P
lan
30%
Site
s ov
er 5
Una
lloca
ted
site
s -t
o be
ne
gotia
ted
Har
boro
ugh
Cor
e St
rate
gy40
%H
igh
Valu
e ar
eas
30%
Oth
er a
reas
Hin
ckle
y an
d B
osw
orth
Cor
e St
rate
gy40
%R
ural
are
as20
%O
ther
Are
asLe
ices
ter C
ityC
ore
Stra
tegy
15%
Reg
ener
atio
n ar
ea30
%So
uth
East
and
Ash
ton
G20
%El
sew
here
Mel
ton
Loca
l Pla
nTo
be
nego
tiate
d si
te b
y si
teN
W L
eice
ster
shire
Loca
l Pla
nTo
be
nego
tiate
dSP
D20
%G
reat
er C
oalv
ille A
rea
and
Ibst
ock
30%
All o
ther
set
tlem
ents
Oad
by a
nd W
igst
onC
ore
Stra
tegy
30%
Oad
by20
%W
igst
on10
%So
uth
Wig
ston
Rut
land
Cor
e S
trate
gy35
%(C
omm
uted
sum
on
<5 u
nits
35
Site
developm
enta
ssum
ptions
Num
ber
Site
Uni
tsA
rea
Den
sity
Aver
age
Uni
t S
ize
Den
sity
haU
nits
/ha
m2
m2
m2/
ha1
SU
E 1
314
8.50
3781
.925
,723
3,02
62
SU
E 2
250
8.00
3182
.920
,730
2,59
13
Gre
enfie
ld 1
150
3.75
4091
.113
,661
3,64
34
Gre
enfie
ld 2
110
2.50
4489
.19,
798
3,91
95
Stu
dent
Hou
sing
100
0.60
167
27.0
2,70
04,
500
6B
row
nfie
ld re
dev.
L70
1.40
5078
.15,
466
3,90
47
Urb
an F
lats
600.
6010
076
.44,
586
7,64
38
Bro
wnf
ield
rede
v. M
300.
4271
70.6
2,11
95,
045
9M
ediu
m B
row
nfie
ld24
0.40
6069
.31,
663
4,15
810
Med
ium
gre
enfie
ld24
0.57
4290
.52,
171
3,80
911
Urb
an e
dge
120.
3040
86.8
1,04
13,
470
12To
wn
cent
re fl
ats
100.
2050
80.4
804
4,02
013
Ex
gara
ge s
ite5
0.12
4284
.642
33,
525
14To
wn
Villa
ge In
fill
40.
1040
83.5
334
3,34
015
Sm
all V
illag
e S
chem
e3
0.10
3092
.027
62,
760
16Vi
llage
Hou
se1
0.10
1011
1.0
111
1,11
0TO
TAL
314
8.50
3781
.925
,723
3,02
6
36
AlternativeLand
Use
andUplift
Num
ber
Site
Alte
rnat
ive
Land
U
seU
plift
Add
ition
al£/
ha%
£/ha
£/ha
1S
UE
1A
gric
ultu
ral
25,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
278,
750
2S
UE
2A
gric
ultu
ral
25,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
278,
750
3G
reen
field
1A
gric
ultu
ral
25,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
278,
750
4G
reen
field
2A
gric
ultu
ral
25,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
278,
750
5S
tude
nt H
ousi
ngIn
dust
rial
300,
000
15.0
0%34
5,00
06
Bro
wnf
ield
rede
v. L
Indu
stria
l30
0,00
015
.00%
345,
000
7U
rban
Fla
tsIn
dust
rial
300,
000
15.0
0%34
5,00
08
Bro
wnf
ield
rede
v. M
Indu
stria
l30
0,00
015
.00%
345,
000
9M
ediu
m B
row
nfie
ldIn
dust
rial
300,
000
15.0
0%34
5,00
010
Med
ium
gre
enfie
ldA
gric
ultu
ral
25,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
278,
750
11U
rban
edg
eP
addo
ck30
0,00
015
.00%
250,
000
595,
000
12To
wn
cent
re fl
ats
Indu
stria
l30
0,00
015
.00%
345,
000
13E
x ga
rage
site
Indu
stria
l30
0,00
015
.00%
345,
000
14To
wn
Villa
ge In
fill
Res
iden
tial
500,
000
15.0
0%57
5,00
015
Sm
all V
illag
e S
chem
eP
addo
ck50
,000
15.0
0%25
0,00
030
7,50
016
Villa
ge H
ouse
Pad
dock
50,0
0015
.00%
250,
000
307,
500
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 29
07/11/20
12 10
37
Site
1Site
2Site
3Site
4Site
5Site
6Site
7Site
8Site
9Site
10Site
11Site
12Site
13Site
14Site
15Site
16
SUE1
SUE2Greenfiel
d1Greenfiel
d2Greenfiel
d3Brow
nfiel
drede
v.L
Urban
FlatsBr
ownfiel
drede
v. M
Med
ium
Brow
nfiel d
Med
ium
greenfiel d
Urban
edge
Town
centre
flatsEx
garage site
Town
Village
Infill
Small
Village
Sche
me
Village
House
Site
Area
(ha)
8.50
8.00
3.75
2.50
1.80
1.40
0.60
0.42
0.40
0.57
0.30
0.20
0.12
0.10
0.10
0.10
Units
314
250
133
8881
7060
3024
2412
105
43
1
Blab
y29
8211
614
280
349
128
181
115
118
4415
4Ch
arnw
ood
139
194
276
299
155
320
167
437
201
181
202
419
374
243
Harborou
gh63
115
223
246
182
7119
546
512
315
257
119
5812
7Hinckley
and
Bosw
orth
1859
204
172
9955
213
065
350
100
430
9011
226
716
8Leicester
231
224
352
376
8861
458
3767
160
293
105
9127
281
130
Melton
193
147
268
332
156
426
190
193
202
419
374
243
North
West
Leicestershire
8765
114
351
2352
137
221
262
3129
020
815
190
305
Oad
byan
dWigston
6614
821
036
312
193
123
1535
629
35
2027
215
516
8Ru
tland
298
256
285
9720
111
239
614
124
520
241
937
424
3
Cur
rent
Affo
rdab
le T
arge
tA
dditi
onal
Pro
fit (£
/m2)
38
Zero
Affo
rdab
le T
arge
tA
dditi
onal
Pro
fit (£
/m2)
Site
1Site
2Site
3Site
4Site
5Site
6Site
7Site
8Site
9Site
10Site
11Site
12Site
13Site
14Site
15Site
16
SUE1
SUE2Greenfiel
d1Greenfiel
d2Greenfiel
d3
Brow
nfie
ldrede
v. LUrban
FlatsBr
ownfie
ldrede
v. M
Med
ium
Brow
nfie ld
Med
ium
greenfiel d
Urban
edge
Town
centre
flatsEx
garage site
Town
Village
Infill
Small
Village
Sche
me
Village
House
Site
Area
(ha)
8.50
8.00
3.75
2.50
1.80
1.40
0.60
0.42
0.40
0.57
0.30
0.20
0.12
0.10
0.10
0.10
Units
314
250
133
8881
7060
3024
2412
105
43
1
Blab
y21
727
852
1381
452
293
591
272
267
168
Charnw
ood
347
411
444
468
390
116
9639
459
242
969
202
419
374
243
Harborou
gh34
741
144
446
839
011
939
459
242
969
202
419
374
127
Hinckley
and
Bosw
orth
152
7931
446
852
315
1381
452
293
591
272
267
168
Leicester
347
344
444
468
179
152
242
8315
224
529
310
591
272
8113
0Melton
412
390
116
9639
459
242
969
202
419
374
243
North
West
Leicestershire
152
7931
446
823
052
1349
452
293
520
272
155
168
Oad
byan
dWigston
152
7931
446
823
052
1349
452
293
520
272
155
168
Rutla
nd51
046
850
539
046
639
459
242
969
202
419
374
243
39
App
rais
al S
ites
– C
urre
nt L
and
Use
s
Num
ber
Site
Al
tern
ativ
e La
nd U
se
Num
ber
Site
Al
tern
ativ
e La
nd U
se1
SUE
1
Agr
icul
tura
l 9
Med
ium
Bro
wnf
ield
In
dust
rial
2SU
E 2
A
gric
ultu
ral
10M
ediu
m g
reen
field
A
gric
ultu
ral
3G
reen
field
1
Agr
icul
tura
l 11
Urb
an e
dge
Pad
dock
4
Gre
enfie
ld 2
A
gric
ultu
ral
12To
wn
cent
re fl
ats
Indu
stria
l 5
Stud
ent H
ousi
ng
Indu
stria
l 13
Ex g
arag
e si
te
Indu
stria
l 6
Brow
nfie
ld re
dev.
L
Indu
stria
l 14
Tow
n V
illage
Infil
l R
esid
entia
l 7
Urb
an F
lats
In
dust
rial
15Sm
all V
illage
Sch
eme
Pad
dock
8
Brow
nfie
ld re
dev.
M
Indu
stria
l 16
Villa
ge H
ouse
P
addo
ck
Sou
rce:
HD
H 2
012
40
AppraisalR
esultsshow
ingAd
ditio
nalProfit
andAp
proxim
ateRe
sidu
alVa
lue
Greenfield
Large
Indu
stial
Small
Indu
stria
lLargeOffice
SmallO
ffice
LargeRe
tailSm
allerR
etail
Leicester
Shop
sOther
Shop
sLeisu
re
Blaby,Ch
arnw
ood,Ha
rborou
gh,H
inckleyandBo
sworth,Melton,NW
Leicestershire
andRu
tland
Coun
cils
Additio
nalProfit
2,84
4,89
411
,297
Resid
ualLandWorth
(APP
ROX)
4,17
2,39
424
,407
LeicesterC
ity,andOadby
andWigston
Coun
cils
Additio
nalProfit
2,84
4,89
411
,297
Resid
ualLandWorth
(APP
ROX)
4,17
2,39
424
,407
AppraisalR
esultsshow
ingAd
ditio
nalProfit
andAp
proxim
ateRe
sidu
alVa
lue
Brow
nfield
Large
Indu
stial
Small
Indu
stria
lLargeOffice
SmallO
ffice
LargeRe
tailSm
allerR
etail
Leicester
Shop
sOther
Shop
sLeisu
re
Blaby,Ch
arnw
ood,Ha
rborou
gh,H
inckleyandBo
sworth,Melton,NW
Leicestershire
andRu
tland
Coun
cils
Additio
nalProfit
1,36
4,18
5Re
sidualLandWorth
(APP
ROX)
2,81
1,68
52,82
6LeicesterC
ity,andOadby
andWigston
Coun
cils
Additio
nalProfit
131,54
527
9,62
2Re
sidualLandWorth
(APP
ROX)
2,53
9,04
529
7,32
21,66
7
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION30
07/11/20
12 11
41
AppraisalR
esultsshow
ingpo
tentialm
axim
umCILpaym
ent£
.m2
Large
Indu
stial
Small
Indu
stria
lLarge
Office
Small
Office
Large
Retail
Smaller
Retail
Leicester
Shop
sOther
Shop
sLeisu
re
Greenfield
Blaby,Ch
arnw
ood,
Harborou
gh,H
inckley
andBo
sworth,Melton,
NW
Leicestershire
and
Rutla
ndCo
uncils
474
75LeicesterC
ity,and
Oadby
andWigston
Coun
cils
474
75Brow
nfield
Blaby,Ch
arnw
ood,
Harborou
gh,H
inckley
andBo
sworth,Melton,
NW
Leicestershire
and
Rutla
ndCo
uncils
227
LeicesterC
ity,and
Oadby
andWigston
Coun
cils
221,86
4
•H
otel
s£4
78/m
2•
Stud
ent A
ccom
mod
atio
n £1
92/m
2
Infra
stru
ctur
e R
equi
rem
ents
42
Cos
ts o
f Inf
rast
ruct
ure
requ
ired
to s
uppo
rt n
ew
deve
lopm
ent
LES
S
Com
mitt
ed F
undi
ng
=Fu
ndin
g G
ap
Infra
stru
ctur
e R
equi
rem
ents
43
Use
exi
stin
g in
frast
ruct
ure
evid
ence
bas
e N
atio
nally
Sig
nific
ant I
nfra
stru
ctur
e P
roje
cts
(NS
IP’s
)
Con
serv
ativ
e ap
proa
ch•S
ome
fund
ing
TBC
•Act
ual f
undi
ng g
ap c
ould
be
larg
er
All
have
a fu
ndin
g ga
p
Set
ting
CIL
44
•Vi
abilit
y E
vide
nce
•Fu
ndin
g G
ap•
Con
sulta
tions
•S
triki
ng th
e B
alan
ce
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 31
Appendix 2: List of consultees at Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
Who was consulted Email Letter
Blaby District Counci X
Harborough District Council X
Charnwood BC X X
North West Leicestershire DC X
Oadby & Wigston BC X
Melton BC X
Hinckley & Bosworth BC X
Leicestershire CC X
Wanlip Parish Meeting X
Birstall Parish Council X
Thurmaston Parish Council X
Barkby & Barkby Thorpe CP X
Scraptoft Parish Council X
Thurnby and Bushby Parish Council X
Glen Parva Parish Council X
Stoughton Parish Council X
Blaby Parish Council X
Enderby Parish Council X
Braunstone Town Council X
Leicester Forest East PC X
Kirby Muxloe Parish Council X
Glenfi elds CP X
Anstey CP X
Thurcaston & Cropston PC X
Civil Aviation Authority X
Homes and Communities Agency X
NHS National Commissioning Board X
Offi ce of Rail Regulation X
The Highways Agency X
The Environment Agency X
English Heritage X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION32
Who was consulted Email Letter
Natural England X
Marine Management Organisation X
Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group X
Leicestershire County Council Highways X
The Coal Authority X
Mobile Operators Association X
Three X
O2 X X
Orange X
T-Mobile X
Vodafone X
EE X
Severn Trent Water X
National Grid (Hinckley) X
Centrica X
LLEP X
LABA X
Leicester Civic Society X
20th Century Society X
Leicestershire Campaign for better transport X
Age UK X
LACBA X X
Leicester College X
Leicester University X
DeMontfort University X
Leicester Centre for intergrated Living X
Leicestershire Chamber of Commerce X X
Home Builders Federation X
Barratt Developments Plc X
Bellway Plc X
Bovis Homes Group Plc X
CALA Group Ltd X
County Life Homes Ltd X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 33
Who was consulted Email Letter
Crest Nicholson PLC X
Davidsons Developments Limited X
Galliford Try plc X
Gilbert & Hall Ltd X
H B Lewis & Sons Ltd X
Lovell Partnerships Ltd X
McCarthy & Stone Retirement Lifestyles Limited X
Morris Homes Ltd X
Persimmon Plc X
Redrow PLC X
St. Modwen Properties PLC X
Taylor Wimpey plc X
The Crown Estate X
The Miller Group Ltd X
Jelson Limited X
Westleigh Homes X
RSPB - Leicester X
CfDS X
Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust X
Leicester Council Of Faiths X
Leicester City Football Club X
Leicester Tigers Rugby Club X
Leicestershire County Cricket Club X
Leicester Riders X X
Birstall Golf Course X
The Leicestershire Golf Course X
The Ramblers Association X
The Conservation Volunteers X
Federation of Muslim Organisations (Leicestershire) X
BT Group Ltd X
Canal and Rivers Trust X
The Georgian Group X
Foxton Inclined Plane Trust X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION34
Who was consulted Email Letter
NFU X
Fields in Trust X
The Theatres Trust X
Leicester Theatre Trust X
Sikh Federation (UK) X
Mencap X
NJUG X
Sport England X
Institue of Directors (leicestershire Branch) X
Leicester United Caribbean Association X
National Housing Federation X
PDE Consulting X
GVA X
Bouldins X
GMS X
Gladman X
Fairhurst X
English Heritage (specifi c contact) X
Peacock and smith X
Natural England (specifi c contact) X
Environment Agency (specifi c contact) X
G L Hearn. X
Silkstone Environmental X
Walton X
Deloitte X
White Young Green X
Nathaniel Litchfi eld & Partners X
Woodlands Trust X
Barton Willmore X
Dtz X
Turley Associates X
Jwpc X
Cgms X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 35
Who was consulted Email Letter
planware.co.uk X
Bloorhomes X
Lidl X
Leicester and Leicestershire X
Liz Kendall MP X
Keith Vaz MP X
Jon Ashworth MP X
ratilal X
National Planning Unit X
Anne Hayto X
Nigel Porter X
Victorian Society X
Fox Group X
Leicester Access Forum X
Lamp Direct X
Andrew Granger X
Andy Brookes X
Vista X
Michael Lambert – Leicestershire Police X
Voluntary Action Leicestershire X
Peacock and Smith X
Fusion Online Ltd X
Mather Jamie X
ldpag X
Mosaic 1898 X
Savills X
llgbc X
East Midlands Skyscraper City Forum X
Leicester Spokes X
Insight Planning X
hsduk101 X
Depol X
Graham Sleath X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION36
Who was consulted Email Letter
Forum for the future X
kirkwells X
Bnpparibas X
Greenbelt group X
cpre.org.uk; X
hbj-gw.com; X
Jarroms X
NCP X
Severntrent X
Shonki Brothers X
West Bridge Living X
Sowden Group X
amamidlands X
Sgp.co.uk; X
raglan.org; X
Lance Wiggins - Landmark Planning X
Foundation Housing X
advanceuk.org; X
NRSPROPERTY.CO.UK; X
jenko1945 X
Leicester University X
Kpw Architects X
Renewable UK X
Goodmans X
Action Deafness X
Pete Wilkinson – Landmark planning X
Shakespeare Marrons X
Innes England X
Lambert Smith Hampton X
jamessellicks.com X
Mather Jamie X
Henry Boot X
Pegasus Planning X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 37
Who was consulted Email Letter
Freeth Cartwright X
Andrew Martin X
Andrew Ashwell X
David Morley X
Fisher German.co.uk X
Oxalis Planning X
iceniprojects.com X
capita.co.uk X
signetplanning.com X
howplanning.com X
ssrplanning.co.uk X
lucasland.co.uk X
rgparchitects.com X
ancerspa.co.uk X
twigg.biz X
intali.com X
rutlandplanning X
bartonwillmore.co.uk X
Andy Hiorns X
Debbie taylor X
boyerplanning.co.uk X
cerda-planning.co.uk X
Dlpconsultants.co.uk X
gr-1.co.uk X
stuart.dawson X
howkinsandharrison.co.uk X
eu.jll.com X
michaelwellock X
mslaw.co.uk X
montagu-evans.co.uk X
rpsgroup.com X
sedgwickassociates.co.uk X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION38
Who was consulted Email Letter
sra-architecture.co.uk X
John hall X
davidlock.com X
butteryandwatson.co.uk X
harrismccormack.co.uk X
Baily Planning X
planningprospects.co.uk X
aimsltd.co.uk X
D Green - turleyassociates.co.uk X
Harborough London X
ACERT X
Network Rail X
Arriva Bus X (form)
British Geological Survey X
CAMRA X
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology X
Church Commissioners for England (normally just DoL) X
Equality and Human Rights Commission X
Forestry Commission X
First Bus X (form)
Freight Transport Association X (form)
Leicester shire promotions X
Leicester Connexions (Part of LCC) X
Leicestershire and Rutland Sport Board (Share Sport Eng) X
Leicestershire Fire and Rescue X
Hammilton Residents Association X
Midland Mainline X
National Off ender Management Services X
Road Haulage Association. X
Home Offi ce X
Department for Communities and Local Government X
Department for Education; X
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Aff airs X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 39
Who was consulted Email Letter
Department for Transport X
Department for Business Innovation and Skills X
Department of Health X
Ministry of Defence X
Department of Work and Pensions X
Ministry of Justice; and X
Department for Culture, Media and Sport. X
Royal Mail [email protected] X
National Retail Federation X
Capita X
NCHA X
Midland Heart X
North Warwickshire BC X
Applegate Leicester X
Rugby BC X
Blueprint UK X
British Property Federation X X
Fisher German X
How Planning X
Opal Group X X
Lambert Smith Hampton X
East Midlands Housing Association X X
Unite Group X
Rushcliff e BC X
South Derbyshire X
Marrons X X
Lichfi eld DC X
Lovells X
MatherJamie X
Crest Nicholson PLC X
Famework HA X
ADSA X
Sainsbury's X X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION40
Who was consulted Email Letter
Morrisions X X
Tescos X X
Co-op X X
Aldi X X
Lidl X X
Waitrose X
Lucasland X
Longhurst Group X
jamesrdesign X
Cancer UK X
breslin Architects X
ainscoughstrategicland X
Gazeleys X
County land and Business Association X
Stepford Homes X
Andrew Twigg & Associates Ltd X
Peter Wilmot Achitects X
Stanforth Architects X
Waterloo Housing Group X
Peagus UK X
Anglian Water X
WDA Planning X
Loughborough University X
Harris McCormac X
Harrow Estates X
Barton Willmore X
ass-ltd.com X
thearchitect X
hssparchitects.co.uk X
gotadsl.co.uk X
i-lid.co.uk X
jed X
krassociates.co.uk X
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 41
Who was consulted Email Letter
mark.winklewski X
mja-architects.co.uk X
mccombiesmith.co.uk X
msplan.co.uk X
monolitharchitecture.co.uk X
nbwarchitects.co.uk X
n.tomson X
pca-architects.com X
Pd Architecture X
P J wilmot X
Philip Brownassociates X
kenyeates X
longhurst-group.org.uk X
taylorrobin X
strangeway.co.uk X
thomaswilsonarchitects.co.uk X
tomreeve.co.uk X
A Harding X
uppingham.co.uk X
Nick Marshall w b d X
Philip Heath 1 X
M Pritchett X
Multiagency Travellers Unit X
British Retail Consortium X X
Total Consultees = 351
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION42
Appendix 3: Email and letter sent to Consultees
Paul Statham
From: planning-policySent: 29 May 2014 11:44To: planning-policySubject: Leicester City Council - Community Infrastructure Levy – Consultation on
Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
The Council intends to introduce the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), and is in the process of preparing aCommunity Infrastructure Levy Charging Schedule.CIL is a new charge that local authorities can place on new development . The levy will be used to fundinfrastructure to support growth.Before a Charging Schedule can be adopted by the Council it must be subject to two rounds of consultation and anexamination in public. This is the first stage of the consultation process.The Council has prepared a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (PDCS) along with the supporting evidence basedocuments. The PDCS sets out the proposed charging rates for Leicester.The Council invites comments on the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and supporting documents.
The consultation period runs from Wednesday 28th May 2014 and ends on Thursday 10th July 2014 at 5.00pm.
The summary PDCS, a PDCS supplementary document ( which includes a draft instalments policy), CIL InfrastructureProjects List, Draft Regulation 123 List and supporting documents can be viewed on the Council’s website:
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your council services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/
Copies of the PDCS documents are available at all City Council customer service centres and can be accessed at allpublic libraries via the free internet access provided there.
You can comment by:
• Using the Council’s on line consultation system http://consultations.leicester.gov.uk/city development andneighbourhoods/community infrastructure levy viability assessment/
• By writing to: The Planning Policy Team, PDCS Consultation, Leicester City Council, A 11 New WalkCentre, Welford Place, Leicester LE1 6ZG
• By email: [email protected]
The PDCS contains a number of questions on which the Council would like your views . Please be aware that yourcomments will be published on the Council’s website together with your name.
Regards
Jeevan DhesiPlanning PolicyLeicester City CouncilTel: 0116 454 2983
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 43
Email:[email protected] ref:PP/CILDate:29 May 2014Please ask for : Jeevan DhesiTel: 0116 4542983
Planning Policy
A11, New Walk CentreWelford Place
Leicester LE1 6ZGwww.leicester.gov.uk/planning
Dear Sir /Madam
Community Infrastructure Levy – Consultation on Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
Wednesday 28th May 2014 to 5.00 pm Thursday 10th July 2014
The Council intends to introduce the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), and is in the process of preparing a Community Infrastructure Levy Charging Schedule.CIL is a new charge that local authorities can place on new development . The levy will be used to fund infrastructure to support growth.Before a Charging Schedule can be adopted by the Council it must be subject to two rounds of consultation and an examination in public. This is the first stage of the consultation process.The Council has prepared a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (PDCS) along with the supporting evidence base documents. The PDCS sets out the proposed charging rates for Leicester.The Council invites comments on the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule and supporting documents. The consultation period runs from Wednesday 28th May 2014 and ends on Thursday 10th July 2014 at 5.00pm.The summary PDCS, a PDCS supplementary document ( which includes a draft instalments policy), CIL Infrastructure Projects List, Draft Regulation 123 List and supporting documents can be viewed on the Council’s website: http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/
Copies of the PDCS documents are available at all City Council customer service centres and can be accessed at all public libraries via the free internet access provided there.
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION44
You can comment by:
Using the Council’s on line consultation system which can be accessed from the CIL webpage
By writing to: The Planning Policy Team, PDCS Consultation, Leicester City Council, A 11 New Walk Centre, Welford Place, Leicester LE1 6ZG
By email: [email protected]
The PDCS contains a number of questions on which the Council would like your views . Please be aware that your comments will be published on the Council’s website together with your name.For enquiries, please contact the telephone number given at the top of this letter
Yours faithfully
Jeevan DhesiPlanning Policy Leicester City Council
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 45
Community Infrastructure Levy - Leicester City Council
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/[24/09/2014 16:05:13]
Environment & Planning
Follow us…
Search
A-Z
Help
About Us
Contact Us
Home > Your Council & Services > Environment & Planning > Planning > Plans, policyand guidance > Community Infrastructure Levy
Community Infrastructure LevyLeicester City Council is proposing to introduce a Community Infrastructure Levy(CIL).
CIL is a new charge that local authorities can place on new development in theirarea. Its purpose is to help fund infrastructure that is needed to support newdevelopment.
Before the CIL charge is adopted by the Council it must be subject to two rounds ofconsultation. This is the first stage of the consultation process – The Preliminary DraftCharging Schedule stage.
The Council has prepared a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (PDCS) along withthe supporting evidence base documents for consultation. The PDCS sets out theproposed charging rates for Leicester.
The Council invites comments on the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule andsupporting documents.
Viewing the Documents.
The summary Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (PDCS) , a PDCSsupplementary document ( which includes a draft instalments policy) , CILInfrastructure Projects List , Draft Regulation 123 List, can be downloaded byfollowing the above links or from the bottom of this page.
The CIL Viability Assessment demonstrates the level of CIL that could besupported by development, and assists the Council in deciding the rate of the levythat could be reasonably charged without putting the viability of development inLeicester at serious risk.
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study - Leicester CityAnnex
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study - Appendices
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study – Results Annex
Plans, policy andguidance
2006 Local Plan
Area and Site PlanningGuidance
City-Wide PlanningGuidance
CommunityInfrastructure Levy
Design and Access forDisabled People
Local DevelopmentFramework
Major Schemes and Awards
New Local Plan
Planning Policy Team
Regional Plan
Supplementary PlanningDocuments (SPD)
Waste DevelopmentFramework
Waste Local Plan
Advice & Benefits
Business Community & Living
Council & Democracy
Education & Learning
Environment & Planning
Health & Social Care
Housing Jobs & Careers
Leisure &Culture
Transport& Streets
A-Z
|A |a |Reset Text |High Contrast |Low Graphics |Print Accessibility
search
Appendix 4: CIL web page
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION46
Community Infrastructure Levy - Leicester City Council
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/[24/09/2014 16:05:13]
Other supporting documents that are referenced in this consultation are: -
Leicester Core Strategy (adopted 2010),
Leicestershire & Leicester Growth infrastructure assessment
Leicester City Growth infrastructure assessment extract
Leicester City Council Affordable Housing Provision and DeveloperContributions
Printed copies of the Preliminary Draft Schedule documents are available at all CityCouncil customer service centres, and the documents can be accessed at all publiclibraries via the free internet access provided there.
The consultation period runs from Wednesday 28th May 2014 and ends onThursday 10th July 2014 at 5.00pm.
You can comment by
Using the Council’s on line consultation system which can be accessed from thecouncil's Citizen Space pages http://consultations.leicester.gov.uk/city-development-and-neighbourhoods/community-infrastructure-levy-viability-assessment/
By writing to: The Planning Policy Team, CIL PDCS Consultation, Leicester CityCouncil, A 11 New Walk Centre, Welford Place, Leicester LE1 6ZG
By email: [email protected]
Comments received at this stage will be taken into consideration in preparing a draftcharging schedule, which will be subject to further consultation.
Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (Summary) [pdf / 680KB]
Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule (Supplementary Paper) [pdf / 718KB]
Preliminary Draft Regulation 123 List [pdf / 69KB]
CIL Infrastructure Projects List and Funding Gap [pdf / 112KB]
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 47
Community Infrastructure Levy - Leicester City Council
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/[24/09/2014 16:05:13]
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study [pdf / 1.88MB]
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study - Appendices [pdf /10.32MB]
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study – Results Annex [pdf /7.08MB]
Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland CIL Viability Study - Leicester City Annex[pdf / 840KB]
© Copyright Leicester City Council, City Hall, 115 Charles Street, Leicester, LE1 1FZ.
Contact Us About Us Help/Access Keys Cookies Feedback Privacy/Disclaimer
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION48
Leicester City Council - News Archive For May 2014: New developer charges planned
http://news.leicester.gov.uk/newsArchiveDetail.aspx?Id=2779[24/09/2014 10:14:10]
Home > News
New developer charges planned28/05/2014
LEICESTER City Council is consulting on proposals to change the waycontributions are made to the cost of infrastructure projects linked to newdevelopments.
Currently, councils can require developers to make financial contributionstowards infrastructure improvements such as parks, roads, and schoolsunder Section 106 Agreements.
From next year, the government wants councils to introduce a new, locally-agreed system of securing infrastructure funds from development through aCommunity Infrastructure Levy (CIL).
This requires local authorities to charge developers a fixed tariff based onthe type and size of new building projects.
Before the new levy is introduced in Leicester, the city council needs toagree its proposed levy rates in consultation with residents and developers.This is based on a list of proposed infrastructure schemes that couldpotentially be needed as a result of development over the next ten to 12years. This will be used to guide the investment of funds received from newdevelopments.
The list is linked to the city council’s planning strategy and includesimprovements to transport, the provision of more school places, andimprovements to parks and green spaces.
Money raised through the Community Infrastructure Levy could raise up to£500k per year from 2016/2017.
City Mayor Peter Soulsby said: “All development will impact on a city’sinfrastructure in one way or another. It is absolutely vital that we continueto encourage growth and regeneration, but we cannot ignore the demandsthat new development makes on local amenities and services.
“Where investment needs to be made to meet those increased demands, itis fair that developers contribute.
“We are proposing a charging tariff that we think is appropriate, and whichwill still encourage developers to invest in the city.”
Council Press Office:
0116 454 4150
Email us at:
2014 2013 20122011
Latest News
What's On
BBC Leicester News
Leicester Mercury
Leicestershire Constabulary
Councillors
Meetings & Minutes
Leicester Facts
Planning Applications
Council News Contact Us
News Archive
RSS Feeds
Council Info
Advice & Benefits
Business Community & Living
Council & Democracy
Education & Learning
Environment & Planning
Health & Social Care
Housing Jobs & Careers
Leisure &Culture
Transport& Streets
A-Z
|A |a |Reset Text |High Contrast |Low Graphics |Print Accessibility
search
Appendix 5: Press Statement
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 49
Leicester City Council - News Archive For May 2014: New developer charges planned
http://news.leicester.gov.uk/newsArchiveDetail.aspx?Id=2779[24/09/2014 10:14:10]
© Copyright Leicester City Council, City Hall, 115 Charles Street, Leicester, LE1 1FZ.
Contact Us About Us Help/Access Keys Cookies Feedback Privacy/Disclaimer
The proposed Community Infrastructure Levy charges for residentialdevelopment in Leicester would be £25 per sqm per house, up to amaximum of £2,000. There would be no charge for new houses built inregeneration areas.
Proposed charges for non-residential development would be higher. Forexample large retail developments, including supermarkets andwarehouses, could be charged a proposed levy of £150 per sqm.
A consultation on the proposed Community Infrastructure Levy has beenlaunched today (May 28) and will run for six weeks.
People can complete the consultation questionnaire online atwww.leicester.gov.uk/haveyoursay
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION50
News Releaseno: 2779date: 28 May 2014release: For Immediate Release
New developer charges plannedLEICESTER City Council is consulting on proposals to change the way contributions are made to the cost of infrastructure projects linked to new developments.
Currently, councils can require developers to make fi nancial contributions towards in-frastructure improvements such as parks, roads, and schools under Section 106 Agree-ments.
From next year, the government wants councils to introduce a new, locally-agreed sys-tem of securing infrastructure funds from development through a Community Infrastruc-ture Levy (CIL).
This requires local authorities to charge developers a fi xed tariff based on the type and size of new building projects.
Before the new levy is introduced in Leicester, the city council needs to agree its pro-posed levy rates in consultation with residents and developers. This is based on a list of proposed infrastructure schemes that could potentially be needed as a result of devel-opment over the next ten to 12 years. This will be used to guide the investment of funds received from new developments.
The list is linked to the city council’s planning strategy and includes improvements to transport, the provision of more school places, and improvements to parks and green spaces.
Money raised through the Community Infrastructure Levy could raise up to £500k per year from 2016/2017.
City Mayor Peter Soulsby said: “All development will impact on a city’s infrastructure in one way or another. It is absolutely vital that we continue to encourage growth and regeneration, but we cannot ignore the demands that new development makes on local amenities and services.
“Where investment needs to be made to meet those increased demands, it is fair that developers contribute.
“We are proposing a charging tariff that we think is appropriate, and which will still en-courage developers to invest in the city.”
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 51
The proposed Community Infrastructure Levy charges for residential development in Leicester would be £25 per sqm per house, up to a maximum of £2,000. There would be no charge for new houses built in regeneration areas.
Proposed charges for non-residential development would be higher. For example large retail developments, including supermarkets and warehouses, could be charged a pro-posed levy of £150 per sqm.
A consultation on the proposed Community Infrastructure Levy has been launched today (May 28) and will run for six weeks.
People can complete the consultation questionnaire online at www.leicester.gov.uk/haveyoursay
Ends
For further information please contact Jon Evans, Press Offi cer, on 0116 252 7926.
For more news visit www.leicester.gov.uk/news or follow us at www.twitter.com/leicester_news
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION52
Citizen Space - Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
http://consultations.leicester.gov.uk/city-development-and-neighbourhoods/community-infrastructure-levy-viability-assessment[24/09/2014 10:15:51]
OverviewLeicester City Council is consulting on proposals to change the way contributionsare made to the cost of infrastructure projects linked to new developments. Thisnew charge is known as the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL).
Currently, some developments make financial contributions towards infrastructureimprovements including parks, roads, and schools as a planning requirement.
From next year, the government wants councils to introduce a new locally agreedsystem of securing infrastructure funds from development through the CommunityInfrastructure Levy.
This requires local authorities to charge developers a fixed tariff based on the typeand size of new building projects.
Before the new levy is introduced in Leicester, the city council is required to agreeits proposed levy rates in consultation with residents and developers.
The Council has prepared a Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule which includesthe proposed charging rates for types of uses and buildings , and a number ofdocuments which are required as evidence to support the setting of the new levy.These are all available on the Council’s CIL Webpage
Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
Contact0116 [email protected]
DatesConsultation is ClosedRan from 28 May 2014 to 14 Jul 2014
Other InformationAreas:All Areas
Audience:All Residents,Voluntary organisations,Community organisations,All Public and Private Organisations
Interests:Planning
Consultation Hub Find Consultations We Asked, You Said, We Did
Appendix 6: Consultations Portal
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION 53
Citizen Space - Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule
http://consultations.leicester.gov.uk/city-development-and-neighbourhoods/community-infrastructure-levy-viability-assessment[24/09/2014 10:15:51]
http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/ep/planning/plansandguidance/cil/
There are a number of questions which the Council would like your views on.These will assist the Council in deciding the rate of the levy that could bereasonably charged.
Please be aware that your comments will be published on the Council’s websitetogether with your name.
Share This Consultation
Citizen Space from Delib Accessibility Terms of Use Cookies Privacy Help / Feedback
CIL STATEMENT OF CONSULTATION54
Appendix 7: CIL Watch Extract
