Community Forest Planning: Lessons Learned · The Vision: What We Plan For zHealthy urban forest...
Transcript of Community Forest Planning: Lessons Learned · The Vision: What We Plan For zHealthy urban forest...
Dr. Greg McPhersonCenter for Urban Forest Research
Pacific Southwest Research StationU.S.D.A. Forest Service
Davis, CAhttp://cufr.ucdavis.edu
Community Forest Planning:Community Forest Planning:Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
2
The Vision: What We Plan ForThe Vision: What We Plan ForHealthy urban forest ecosystemsStable and cohesive forest canopyA safe, attractive environmentTrees creating sense of placeMaximize net benefitsCoordinated and efficient managementAmple fundingPublic recognition
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
3
The Reality: What We Settle ForThe Reality: What We Settle ForLittle public awareness of benefitsFragmented responsibilitiesInadequate budgetsContinued “downsizing” of street treesRemoval rates exceeding planting ratesEscalating costs and foregone benefits
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
4
Common Elements in Common Elements in Urban Forest Management Urban Forest Management
Plans Plans Mission/VisionEnvironment & HistoryVegetation ResourceDesign Goals Planting GoalsPlant PaletteManagement GoalsMaintenance Goals and Standards
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
5
Into the Black Hole: Life Into the Black Hole: Life History of Four California History of Four California
Urban Forest Plans Urban Forest Plans What Worked and Why?What Failed and Why?Lessons Learned for Making Strong, Implementable PlansPlans for:– Lafayette– Oakland– Santa Cruz– San Francisco
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
6
Trees for LafayetteTrees for Lafayette1975 by Russ BeattyResponse to Rapid GrowthEducational (non-regulatory)Broad Citywide Vision– History– Streetscape Guidelines– Prominent Tree Groves– Planting/Preservation/Maintenance– Tree Selection Guide
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
9
Implementation ResultsImplementation Results
Success: Streamside Restoration– Clear goal, plan review
process workedFailures: – Heritage tree program– Education program– EBMUD planting
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
10
Oakland GreenstreetsOakland Greenstreets1982 by Urban Trees Design Group$450,000 CDBG fundingRebellion Against 1948 PlanPlanting Contracted to Non-ProfitReference Document for Tree Selection/Care– Environmental data– Administrative procedures– Tree planting instructions– Trees for major streets– Trees for neighborhoods– Management and maintenance
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
14
Success– Restored sense of community– Tree planting: 62% major streets, 17% other
Failures– Strong design form– Management
Useful life span IPMComputer databaseContract growing
– Maintenance– Administrative Center
Implementation ResultsImplementation Results
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
15
Santa Cruz County Urban Santa Cruz County Urban Forestry Master PlanForestry Master Plan
Wolfe Mason Assoc. 1992Economic Development– Visual identity and beautification– Major street planting with redevelopment– Other streets planted by neighborhood volunteers
Sophisticated Plan– Purpose– Guiding principles– Overall design theme– Management program– Volunteer program
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
18
Implementation ResultsImplementation ResultsSuccess– Planting goals (8 of 12 projects)
700 trees mitigating redevelopment impacts– Management: work scheduling, training,
inspectionFailures– Design goals (many deviations)– Management
IPMComputer databaseOrdinance changesTrain building inspectors
– Volunteer programLimited outreachLack of structure and leadership
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
19
The Trees of San FranciscoThe Trees of San Francisco1991 by Dept of Public Works and City Tree Advisory BoardGoal: Maximize resources and guide development of the urban forestElements:– Background & History– Goals– Objectives and Policies– Tree Management Plan (Design)– Plan Implementation
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
22
Implementation ResultsImplementation ResultsSuccess– Tree planting: 75% (3,700/yr)– Coordination: planting and
maintenance– Management
Computer databaseWork scheduling, trainingRecyclingTree Corps
Failures– Design: site conditions not addressed– Management
Useful life spanIPMPG&E notify of intent to prune
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
23
What Worked?What Worked?Broad Goals MetTree Planting (50-70% of goal)Management– Scheduling work– Training– Heritage tree program
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
24
What Didn’t Work?What Didn’t Work?Design Goals Inter- and Intra-agency coordinationManagement– Diversity and Useful Life Span– IPM– Computerized tree database– Contract growing– Education programs
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
25
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
Clear and Consistent GoalsKeep it SimpleIdentify Strong SupportersObtain Initial FundingLink Design, Management, EnforcementFind an Imagined Enemy
Center for Urban Forest ResearchCenter for Urban Forest Research
26
Management PlansManagement Plans
Operational Capacity
PoliticalManagementMission
Communicate Communicate with officials with officials and leverage and leverage success to success to increase increase
legitimacy
Increase public Increase public activities,activities,
collaboration, collaboration, and and
improve access improve access to information
legitimacyto information
Build an evaluation Build an evaluation culture with plans, data culture with plans, data collection, assessment, collection, assessment, & reporting& reporting